0% found this document useful (0 votes)
195 views112 pages

Hoek-Brown Critera and GSI

The document describes several quantitative classification systems for rock masses: 1. The Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system assigns a rating based on characteristics like strength, discontinuities, groundwater conditions. This rating can then be used to estimate tunnel stability and support requirements. 2. The Q-System rates rock masses based on factors like RQD, jointing properties, water conditions, and stress reduction. This provides a quantitative measure of rock mass quality. 3. Point load testing provides a quick evaluation of rock strength in the field or lab without extensive sample preparation. Results are indexed to estimate uniaxial compressive strength.

Uploaded by

Mohit Verma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
195 views112 pages

Hoek-Brown Critera and GSI

The document describes several quantitative classification systems for rock masses: 1. The Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system assigns a rating based on characteristics like strength, discontinuities, groundwater conditions. This rating can then be used to estimate tunnel stability and support requirements. 2. The Q-System rates rock masses based on factors like RQD, jointing properties, water conditions, and stress reduction. This provides a quantitative measure of rock mass quality. 3. Point load testing provides a quick evaluation of rock strength in the field or lab without extensive sample preparation. Results are indexed to estimate uniaxial compressive strength.

Uploaded by

Mohit Verma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 112

Quantitative Classification of Rock

Mass
Description of Joints:
Orientation, Persistence, Roughness, Wall
Strength Aperture
Strength, Aperture, Filling
Filling, Seepage
Seepage,
Number of sets, Block size, spacing.
ISRM commissions
i i reportt
Classification of Rock Material
Based on Uniaxial Compressive Strength
Point Load Index
Quick evaluation for uniaxial strength
(field or lab setup)
ASTM D 5731 procedures
Little sample preparation (cores,
pieces)
Measure force (P) to crunch intact rock
specimen
Point Load Index: Is = P/de2 where de
= equivalent core diameter
Fig.8-1
Point Load Index

GCTS Device Roctest Equipment


Uniaxial Compressive Ranges for some
Strength Common Rock
Material
Term Kg/cm2 Schist, Silt stone
y Weak- VW
Very < 70 VW-W, Sand
Stone, Lime stone
Weak- W 70-200
VW-M,Granite,
Medium Strong-MS
Strong MS 200
200-700
700 Basalt,
Basalt Gneiss,
Gneiss
Strong- S 700-1400 Quartzite, Marble
Very Strong-
Strong VS > 1400 MS-VS
MS VS

|
Classification for Rock Material
Strength
Rock Quality Designation (RQD)
or Modified
M difi d C
Core R
Recovery

x i
Q =
RQD
L

xi = lengths
g pieces of core 10 cm
of individual p
L is the total length of the drill run
Indirect Methods of determination
off RQF
Seismic Method -
RQD= (Vf / Vl )2 * 100
R ti off velocity
Ratio l it iin th
the fifield
ld tto th
thatt iin th
the llab
b
Volumetric Count -
RQD = 115- 3.3* Jv
where Jv is a measure of number of joints
within a unit volume of rock mass
RQD

RQD
A. Very poor 0 25
B. Poor 25 50
C. Fair 50 75
D. Good 75 90
E Excellent
E. 90 - 100
ROCK STRUCTURE RATING
(RSR)
Wickham et. al. ((1972)) suggested
gg this based on
observation of small tunnels supported by steel ribs.
RSR = A + B + C
Parameter A A, Geology: General appraisal of geological
structure on the basis of:
a. Rock type origin (igneous, metamorphic,
sedimentary).
di t )
b. Rock hardness (hard, medium, soft, decomposed).
c. Geologic structure (massive, slightly faulted/folded,
moderately faulted/folded,
intensely faulted/folded).
Parameter B, Geometry: Effect of discontinuity pattern
with
ith respectt tto th
the di
direction
ti off th
the ttunnell d
drive
i on th
the
basis of:
a. Joint spacing.
b. Joint orientation (strike and dip).
c. Direction of tunnel drive
Parameter C: Effect of groundwater inflow and joint
condition on the basis of:
a. Overall rock mass quality on the basis of A and B
combined.
b. Joint condition (good, fair, poor).
c. Amount of water inflow (in gallons per minute per 1000
feet of tunnel)..
RMR or Geomechanics
Cl
Classification
ifi i
Guideline properties of Rock Mass
Classes
Cl
Example: 10 m span
Evaluation of Tunnels
RMR = 80
Stand up time > 4 years
b
basedd on RMR RMR = 50
Stand up time 2 days
RMR modified for slopes or tunnels

Additional factors applied to RMRbasic


Accounts for excavation method
BUT moreover,
Accounts for joint orientation wrt the excavation
Unfavourable conditions,, deduct p
points from
RMRbasic
refer section F of Table
Slopes - unfavourable
Slopes - favourable
Tunnels - unfavourable
Tunnels - favourable
Widely spaced joints?
RMR & Tunnels

Stand up time for various tunnel spans


based on RMR
Unreinforced tunnels
no advice re support e.g. shotcrete or
rockbolts/anchors

Shotcrete = sprayed
p y concrete,, lightly
g y reinforced
NGI Q-System Rating for Rock Masses RQD J r J w
Q =

(Barton, Lien, & Lunde, 1974)
Nor wegian Classif ication f or Rock Masses
J n J a SRF
Q - Value Quality of Rock Mass
< 0.01 Exceptionally Poor 4. Discontinuity Condition & Infilling = Ja
0.01 to 0.1 Extremely Poor 4.1 Unfilled Cases
0.1 to 1 Very Poor Healed 0.75
1 to 4 Poor Stained, no alteration 1
4 to 10 Fair Silty or Sandy Coating 3
10 tto 40 G d
Good Cl
Clay coating
ti 4
40 to 100 Very Good 4.2 Filled Discontinuities
100 to 400 Extremely Good Sand or crushed rock inf ill 4
< 400 Exceptionally Good Stif f clay inf illing < 5 mm 6
Sof t clay inf ill < 5 mm thick 8
PARAMETERS FOR THE Q-Rating of Rock Masses Swelling clay < 5 mm 12
Stif f clay inf ill > 5 mm thick 10
1. RQD = Rock Quality Designation = sum of cored pieces Sof t clay inf ill > 5 mm thick 15
> 100 mm long, divided by total core run length Swelling clay > 5 mm 20

2. Number of Sets of Discontinuities (joint sets) = Jn 5. Water Conditions


Massive 0.5 Dry 1
One set 2 Medium W ater Inf low 0 66
0.66
Two sets 4 Large inf low in unf illed j oints 0.5
Three sets 9 Large inf low with f illed j oints
Four or more sets 15 that wash out 0.33
Crushed rock 20 High transient f low 0.2 to 0.1
High continuous f low 0.1 to 0.05
3. Roughness
g of Discontinuities* = Jr
Noncontinuous j oints 4 6. Stress Reduction Factor** = SRF
Rough, wavy 3 Loose rock with clay inf ill 10
Smooth, wavy 2 Loose rock with open j oints 5
Rough, planar 1.5 Shallow rock with clay inf ill 2.5
Smooth, planar 1 Rock with unf illed j oints 1
Slick and planar 0.5
Filled discontinuities 1 **Note: Additional SRF values given
*Note: add +1 if mean joint spacing > 3 m for rocks prone to bursting, squeezing
and swelling by Barton et al. (1974)
Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q
( N
(or Norwegian
i Q system),
t ) B Barton
t ett al.,
l 1974

RQD Jr Jw
Q=
Jn
J Ja
J SRF
RQD = Rock Quality Designation 100 - 10
Jn = Joint set number 1 20
Jr = Joint roughness factor 4 -1
Ja = Joint alteration and clay fillings 1 20
Jw = Joint water inflow or pressure 1 0.1
01
SRF = stress reduction factor 1 20

Typically: 0.01 < Q <100


Q system

RQD Jr Jw
Q=
Jn
J Ja
J SRF

(RQD/Jn) = crude measure of block size


(Jr/Ja) = roughness/friction of surfaces
(Jw/SRF)
( /S ) = ratio off two stress parameters (active
( stress))
Geological Strength Index,
GSI
Developed by Hoek, Kaiser, & Bawden
(1995) H
(1995), Hoek
k&BBrown (1997)
(1997).
GSI from Q-system: GS RQD J r
og
GSI = 9 log + 44
J J
n a
GSI from Geomechanics system where
RMR > 25: 4
GSI = 10 + (Ri )
i =1

Chart approach based on structure &


surface
f quality
lit
Slope Mass Rating (SMR)
SMR = RMRbasicb i ( F1.FF2.F
F3 ) + F4
F1, F2 and F3 are adjustment factors
related to joint orientation with respect to
slope orientation. F4 is the correction
factor for method of excavation.
excavation
Suggested Supports for Various
SMR classes
l
SMR Classes SMR Values Suggested Supports
Ia 91-100 None
Ib 81-90 None, scaling is required
II a 71-80 Spot Bolting
II b 61-70 Spot or systematic bolting

III a 51-60 Spot or systematic bolting, spot shotcrete

III b 41-50 Systematic bolting and shotcrete, toe wall


IV a 31-40 Anchors, systematic shotcrete, toe wall
IV b 21 30
21-30 Systematic
S t ti reinforced
i f d shotcrete,
h t t toe t wall,
ll
re-exacavation
V 11-20 Gravity or anchored wall, re-excavation
Rock Strength: mi parameter
Strength of Rock Masses
mi

Strength of Rock Masses
c'/qu

mi
Equivalent Modulus of Rock Masses
(Table 10
10-7)
7)
Allowable Bearing Stresses on Rock
Masses Foundations on Fr actur ed Rock For mation
30
MPa)

Note: Use maximum qa < q u


wher e q u = compr essive str ength
earing Strress qa (M

25 of intact r ock specimens

20
( RQD / 16 )
q ALLOWABLE ( MPa ) 1 +
15 1 ( RQD / 130 )
NOTE: 1 MPa = 10 tsf
owable Be

10

5 Peck, et al. ((1974))


Allo

Approximation
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Rock Quality Designation, RQD

You might also like