10/26/2017 Print Article : Right To Equality- A Fundamental Right
Right To Equality- A Fundamental Right
Source : http://www.legalserviceindia.com
Author : uma
Published on : July 29, 2014
Right To Equality- A uma's Profile and details
Fundamental Right Asst. Prof.
Uma Pal.
Abstract:
The purpose of this research is to identify the general principle of right
to equality the word Right to equality need no explanation because
it tell its meaning itself. and it is one the our fundamental right. But NIMT,Greater Noida
there are some hidden points which are needed to explain & this
research project highlights those points & exception, which are admissible by our Indian constitution.
it also helps to know why discrimination accepted under constitution law of India?
Right to equality given under article 14 of Indian law. it is one of the fundamental right. It ensure the
guarantees to every person the right to equality before law & equal protection of the laws .it is not
only right of Indian citizens but also right of non-citizens .article 14 says The state shall of India.
article 14 define no one is above the law. All are equal in eye of law.
1.1 Equality before law
The state shall not deny to any person equality before the law.
1.2 Meaning of right to equality
This means that every person, who lives within territory of India, has the equal right before the law.
the meaning of this all are equal in same line. No discrimination based on religion ,race, caste,
sex,and place of birth. its mean that all will be treated as equality among equal .and there will be no
discrimination based on lower or higher class.
Article-14 Of Constitution Of India
The state not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within
The territory of India. protection prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, Caste,
sex, or place of birth. Prof. Dicey, explaining the concept of legal equality as it operated in England,
said: with us every official, from the prime minister down to a constable or a collector of taxes, is
under the same responsibility for every act done without any legal justification as any other citizen.
The phase equality to the law find a place in all written constitutions that guarantees fundamental
rights. All citizens irrespective of birth, religion, sex, or race are equal before law ; that is to say,
there Shall not be any arbitrary discrimination between one citizen or class of citizens and another.
All citizens shall, as human persons he held equal before law. All inhabitants of the republic are
assured equality before the laws.
Pantanjali Sastri, c.j., has expressed that the second expression is corollary of the first and it is
difficult to imaging a situation in which the violation of laws will not be the violation of equality
before laws thus, in substance the two expression mean one and same thing.
According to Dr. Jennings said that: Equality before the law means that equality among equals the
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/print.php?art_id=1688 1/6
10/26/2017 Print Article : Right To Equality- A Fundamental Right
law should be equal for all. And should be equally administered, that like should treated alike. The
right to sue and be sued, to prosecute and prosecuted for the same kind of action should be same for
all citizens of full age and understanding without distinctions of race, religion, wealth, social status or
political influence.
Equal Protection Of Law
Equal protection of law has been given in article 14 of our Indian constitution which has been
taken from section 1 of the 14th amendment act of the constitution of the united state.
Meaning of equal protection of law: here, it means that each person within the territory of India will
get equal Protection of laws.
In Stephens college v. university of Delhiunder The court held that the expression Equal protection
of the laws is now being read as a positive Obligation on the state to ensure equal protection of laws
by bringing in necessary social and economic changes so that everyone may enjoy equal protection
of the laws and nobody is denied such protection. If the state leaves the existing inequalities
untouched laws d by its laws, it fails in its duty of providing equal protection of its laws to all
persons. State will provide equal protection to all the people of India who are citizen of India and as
well as non citizen of India.
Exceptions To Rule Of Law
In the case of Indra Sawhney the right to equality is also recognized as one of basic features of
Indian constitution. Article 14 applies to all person and is not limited to citizens. A corporation,
which is a juristic person, is also entailed to the benefit of this article. This concept implied equality
for equals and aims at striking down hostile discrimination or oppression of inequality. In the case of
Ramesh Prasad v. State of Bihar, AIR 1978 SC 327 It is to be noted that aim of both the concept,
Equality before law and Equal protection of the law is the equal Justice.
Underlying priniciple:-
The Principle of equality is not the uniformity of treatment to all in all respects. it only means that all
persons similarly circumstanced shall be treated alike both in the privileges conferred and liabilities
imposed by the laws. Equal law should be applied to all in the same situation, and there should be no
discrimination between one person and another.
Rule Of Law
The rule of law embodied in Article 14 is the Basic feature of the Indian constitution. Hence it
cannot be destroyed even by an amendment of the constitution under article 368 of the constitution.
Meaning of rule of Law
The Rule of law has been given by prof. Dicey the expression the guarantee of equality before the
law. It means that no man is above the law, all are equal in eye of law. The concept of rule of law
come from magnacarta.its means that law is equal for all in same line. Because state have no religion
all are equal in same line. And uniformity will be applied for all. Every organ of the state under the
constitution of India is regulated and controlled by the rule of law.Absence of arbitrary power has
been held to be the first essential of rule of law. The rule of law requires that the discretion conferred
upon executive authorities must be contained within clearly define limits. The rule of law permeates
the entire fabrics of the constitution of India and it forms one of its basic features.
Article 361 of Indian constitution Law
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/print.php?art_id=1688 2/6
10/26/2017 Print Article : Right To Equality- A Fundamental Right
The President, or the governor or rajpramukh of a state, shall not be answerable to any court for the
exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any act done or purporting to
be done by him In the exercise and performance of those power and duties. Provided that the conduct
of the president may be brought under review
361. Protection of President and Governors and Rajpramukhs.
1) The President, or the Governor or Rajpramukh of a State, shall not be answerable to any court for
the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of his office or for any act done or purporting
to be done by him in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties:
Provided that the conduct of the President may be brought under review by any court, tribunal or
body appointed or designated by either House of Parliament for the investigation of a charge under
article 61: Provided further that nothing in this clause shall be construed as restricting the right of any
person to bring appropriate proceedings against the Government of India or the Government of a
State.
(2) No criminal proceedings whatsoever shall be instituted or continued against the President, or the
Governor of a State, in any court during his term of office.
(3) No process for the arrest or imprisonment of the President, or the Governor of a State, shall issue
from any court during his term of office.
(4) No civil proceedings in which relief is claimed against the President, or the Governor of a State,
shall be instituted during his term of office in any court in respect of any act done or purporting to be
done by him in his personal capacity, whether before or after he entered upon his office as President,
or as Governor of such State, until the expiration of two months next after notice in writing has been
delivered to the President or the Governor, as the case may be, or left at his office stating the nature
of the proceedings, the cause of action therefor, the name, description and place of residence of the
party by whom such proceedings are to be instituted and the relief which he claims.
In Srinivas Theatre v. state of T.N., Reddy, J., has noted that equality before law is a dynamic
concept having many facets. one of them there is that there shall be no privileged person of class and
name shall be above state law. A fact there of is the obligation upon the state to bring about, through
the machinery of law, a more equal society envisaged by the preamble and part ivth ( directive
principles of state policy ) of the Indian constitution.
Permination & Prohibition Of Article 14
Article 14 permits classification but prohibits class legislation the equal protection of law guaranteed
by article 14 does not mean that all laws must be general in character. It does not mean that the same
laws should apply to all persons. It does not mean that every law must have universal application for,
all person are not, by nature, attainment or circumstances in the same position. The varying need of
different classes of persons often require separate treatment. From the very nature of society there
should be different places and the legislature controls the policy and enacts laws in the best interest
of the safety and security of the state. In fact, identical amount to unequal circumstances would
amount to inequality. Thus, a reasonable classification is permitted for the develop society. article is
forbids is class-legislation but it does not forbids reasonable classification. The classification,
however, must not be Arbitrary, artificial or evasive but must be based on some real and substantial
Distinction bearing a just and reasonable relation to the object sought be achieved by the
legislation.Article 14 implied where equals are treated differently without any reasonable basis. But
where equals and unequal are treated differently, article 14 does not apply class legislation is that
which makes an improper discrimination by conferring particular privileges upon a class of persons
arbitrarily selected from a large number of persons, all of whom stand in the same relation to the
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/print.php?art_id=1688 3/6
10/26/2017 Print Article : Right To Equality- A Fundamental Right
privilege granted that between whom and the persons, not so favored no reasonable distinction or
substantial difference can be found justifying the inclusion of one and the exclusion of the other from
such privilege.
Special provision for women and Children and SC,ST & backward classes :
Article 14 of Indian constitution law says that all are equal in the eye of law. No one can prevent the
state from making any special provisions for women and children. For a examples, special seating
arrangement for women in buses, trains, metros trains is not unconstitutional. It was held by court
that reservation of some seats for women in college.
According to section 497 of Indian penal code, audultery is consider as offence when it committed by
men , not consider offence if committed by women thus women cannot be Prosecuted for abetters. It
is clear that it makes special provision for women and which is valid Under constitution law article
15(3). Section 437 of cr.p.c., 1973 restricts the release of an accused person a capital offence on Bail
except women, children under age of 16 years or ill or infirm persons. in Choki v. State of Rajasthan,
the court has held that it valid on the grounds make special Provision for women and therefore, it is
protected under article. Article 15(4) has been inserted by the constitution ( first amendment ) Act,
1951. This amendment has been changed in the supreme court case state of Madras v. champakam
dorairajan. In this case, the reservation of seats for the admission to state medical and engineering
colleges was made on the ground of caste and religion. The court said that it unconstitutional on the
ground that it was based on communal matter. Article 15(4) was interested in the Indian constitution
law after the amendment. the aim to empower the government to make special provisions for the
betterment of educationally and socially backward classes of citizen of India and for the Scheduled
tribes and scheduled castes. State has made many special provision for the weaker sections such as
ST,SC and educationally and socially backward classes of citizens of India., Meaning of Scheduled
caste means such castes, race, or tribes or parts of or groups within Such castes, races or tribes as
are deemed under article 341 to be scheduled castes for the purposes of this constitution.article
341(1) provide additional protection to the members of the scheduled castes having regard to the
social, economical, educational, backwardness from which they suffer because of their caste.
New Concept Of Equality For The Protection Of People Of
India
In the case of the Air India v. Nargesh Meerza Regulation 46 of Indian Airlines regulations
provides an air Hostess will be retire from the service upon attaining the age of 35 years or on
marriage within 4 years of Service or on first pregnancy, whoever found earlier but regulation 47 of
the regulation act the managing director had the discretion extend the age of retirement one year at a
time beyond the age of retirement up to the age of 45 years at his option if an air hostess was found
medically fit .it was held by the court that an air hostess on the ground of pregency was unreasonable
and arbitrary, it was the violation of article 14 under constitution law of India. The regulation did not
restrict marriage after four years and if an air hostess after having fulfilled the condition became
pregnant, there was no ground why first pregnancy should stand in the way of her running service. of
the court said that the termination of service on pregnancy was manifestly unreasonable and arbitrary
on the basis of this it was violation of article 14 of Indian constitution.
In John Vallamattom v. union of India, section 118 of the Indian succession Act, 1925 court
invalidated which prohibited the right of a Christian to make valid will for a religious or charitable
purpose only if he made it at least 12 months before his death. The court occurred the prescription of
time and the application of the provision only to Christian artificial having no nexus with the object
of law. In P. Rajendan v. state of Madras, court said that there was district wise distribution of seats in
state medical colleges on the ground of proportion of population of a district to the total population of
the state. classification will be valid under article 14, there must be a relation between the
classification and the object sought to be achieved. Any one scheme of admission rules should be
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/print.php?art_id=1688 4/6
10/26/2017 Print Article : Right To Equality- A Fundamental Right
devised so as to select the best available talent for admission to medical college in the state. in reality
discriminatory as a high qualified candidate from one district may be rejected while a less qualified
candidate from another district may be admitted.
In D.S Nakara v. union of India, in this case supreme court said that Rule 34 of the central services(
pension) rules, 1972 as unconstitutional on the ground that the classification made by it between
pensioners retiring before a certain date and retiring after that date was not depend upon the any
rational principal it was arbitrary and the infringement of article of article 14 of Indian constitution
law.
Conclusion
Keeping in view of above mentioned statements said by the different courts, it is clear that Article 14
gives the ensurity of equal rights without discrimination. It says equal everyone is Equal in eye of
law. Whether he belongs to different race, religion, social status or wealth.
As Dr. Jennings rightly said: equality before the law means that among equals the law should be
equal and should be equally administered, that like should be treated alike. The right to sue and be
sued to prosecute and prosecuted for the same kind of action should be same for all citizens of full
age and understanding without distinctions of race, religion, wealth, social status or political
influence. Right to equality is a one of the most important part of our Indian constitution, which
gives strengthen to all those people who belongs to Indian nationality. It is necessity of the upcoming
generation to secure their right & change our developing India in to developed India.
********************
About the author: Mrs. Uma Pal - Asst. Professor, NIMT Vidhi Evam Kanun Sansthan, Greater
Noida, India
# Article 14 of constitution of india,1949
# Dicey- law of the constitution, co edn-p.193.
# U.S.A- section 1of 14th amendment says.no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction
the equal protection of laws.
# Burma-section 13
# Eire- section 40(1)
# Chile-Article 10
# Jennings-Law of the constitution, P.49 (3rd ed.).
# (1992) 1ssc,558: AIR 1992, sc 1632
# Indra sawhney v. union of India, ( 200)1 scc 168: AIR 2000 sc 498.
# Charanjit lal chowdhury v. union of India, AIR 1951 sc 41.
# Sheo shanker v. M.P state of government, AIR nag. 58.
# State of west Bengal v. Anwar ali sarkar, AIR 1952 sc 75.
# Indira Nehru Gandhi v. raj Narain, AIR 1975 sc 2299.
# A.K Kraipak v. union of India, (1971)1 scc 457
# S.G Jaisinghani v. union of India, AIR 1967 sc 1427
# Openion of justice Bhagwati in bachan singh v. state of Punjab, AIR 1982 sc 1325.
# Article 361 of Indian constitution law.
# ( 1992 ) 1 SCC 645: AIR 1992 SC 999.
# Chiranjit lal v. union of India, AIR 1951 SC 41.
# Abdul Rehman v. Pinto, AIR 1951 Hyd 11.
# R.K . Garg v. union of India, AIR 1981 SC 2138.
# Monoponies co.v. city of los angles, 33 cal app. 675
# Dattatarya v. state, AIR 1953 Bom. 311
# Yusuf Abdul Aziz v. state of Bombay AIR 1954 SC 321.
# AIR 1957 Raj. 10
# AIR 1951 SC 226.
# Article 366 ( 24) .
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/print.php?art_id=1688 5/6
10/26/2017 Print Article : Right To Equality- A Fundamental Right
# Bhaiyalal v. Harikrishen singh, AIR 1965 SC 1557,1560: (1965) 2SCR 877.
# AIR 1981 SC 1829.
# ( 2003 ) 6 SCC 611
# Peeria karuppan v. state of T.N., ( 1971 ) 1SCC 38: AIR 1971 SC 2085.
# AIR 1983 SC 130
http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/print.php?art_id=1688 6/6
