Moorish Deed of Secondary Conveyance of Incorporeal Heriditaments
Moorish Deed of Secondary Conveyance of Incorporeal Heriditaments
Asservation L.S._________________________________
Signed only in correct public capacity As beneficiary to the Original
1786/1836 Treaty Trust Jurisdiction
P age |1
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem DECLARATIONS
APPELATION, STATUS, AND FACTS 1. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,
princeps: Menes Ankh-El(ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) of the family El
meaning Of God does herby state, assert and aver all of the following:
2. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is a living,
breathing free Man upon inherit soil, an Ipso Jure Moor and Autochthon
National of the Amexem [America} Republic, de jure beneficiary to the
Original Jurisdiction. 3. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L.
Brown) is not and cannot be a U.S. Citizen, subject, vessel or "person"
as defined in Title 26 United. States Code, Section 7701 or elsewhere, or
any other ens legis artificial person, individual, entity, fiction of
law, procedural phantom or juristic personality, notwithstanding the
reproduction of any such fictions in any media, computer, record or
instrument, written or electronic. 4. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel.
Wendell L. Brown) is foreign to the United States and retains official
treatyprotected authority within His chosen jurisdiction. As beneficiary
to the Original Jurisdiction, He is not subject to nor does He volunteer
to submit to or contract with any ens legis artificial or corporate
jurisdiction to which a United States person may be subject. 5. Princeps:
Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) reserves all Rights, Remedies
and Defenses granted to Him by The Creator and memorialized by Menes
Ankh-El correct public capacity as beneficiary to the Original
Jurisdiction. 6. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown)
waives no Rights, Remedies and Defenses nor yields imprescriptibly Rights
including, without limitation, the Right to movement and travel without
restriction, permission or license in any conveyance of His choosing on
'any public roadway in America, and the right to bear arms for the
protection of His family, friends and neighbors without restriction,
unless such waiver is specifically done so in writing. 7. Princeps: Menes
Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) does not volunteer, consent, or
contract to being identified as, of, or connected by any nexus to, any
institutional, bifurcated, public cestui que trust or other fictional
construction of law or ens legis entity of a political state or
subdivision thereof, in any capacity including, without limitation, as
trustee, co-trustee, surety, co-surety, officer co-officer, fiduciary or
co-fiduciary. 8. Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) the
nature and character of his exact and proper designation as: Menes Ankh-
El Shall be written, formatted, printed, engraved and inscribed now and
in perpetuity in all media exactly and precisely as just above-written
with a first and second given name separated from, and joined to, a
family name by a mark of punctuation or the words "of the family"; with
the first letter of each given and family name being capitalized and all
other letters being written in lower case fully in accord with the Rules
of English Grammar.
P age |2
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
9. Trade Mark notice. The name Menes Ankh-El by common law is Trade
Marked and all trade names and derivatives thereof, whether or not
registered, are Trade Marked by and property of Menes ankh-El(ex. rel.
Wendell L. Brown) to whom all rights are reserved. The use thereof
without the express written permission of Menes Ankh-El(ex. rel. Wendell
L. Brown) creates a voluntary an informed consensual contract obligating
the unauthorized user to the payment of a Trade Mark infringement fee as
follows: 10. A Trade Mark infringement fee in the sum certain of ten
thousand dollars ($10,000) lawful specie, gold, or silver, American mint,
or certified bullion, Lawful coin money at current spot market price
pursuant to the Constitution for the united States of America, 1787 anno
Domini, amended anno Domini 1791, Article I, Section 10, Clause I, shall
apply to each unauthorized use of the designation Menes Ankh-El and to
each attempt or event of conversion, alteration, distortion and/or
misnomer whether by improper spelling, abbreviation, capitalization,
initializing, reversal of parts, or conversion to a fiction of law or
other juristic personality or artificial being. 11. The legal doctrine of
idem sonans is inapposite to Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown)
whether oral or written; all such improper usages and misnomers
comprising infringement on the above-noticed copyright. 12. Menes Ankh-El
(ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) does hereby accept the Original Jurisdiction,
to wit: A. B. C. D. Constitution for the united States of America, an no
Domini 1787, Articles of Amendment anno Domini 1791; National Bill of
Rights, anno Domini 1776; The Northwest Ordinance, anno Domini 1787; 1786
Treaty of Peace and Friendship at Morocco with the seal of the Emperor of
Morocco June 23, 1786 (25 Shaban, A. H. 1200) E. United States Republic
Constitution: Article III (3), Section two (2), Amendment V (5) (Liberty
clause) and Amendment IX (9) (Reservation of the Rights of the People).
13. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) does hereby further state,
assert and aver the following facts: A. It is well established under
public policy that citations, legislations, prescriptions and other
presentments issued by government bodies politic on the alleged authority
of State codes comprise a cloak to disguise collateral undertaking in
U.S. Funds. All such offers want for authority under original organic
State Constitutions pursuant to which they are forbidden and can never be
duly enacted. B. The U.S. a.k.a. the United States is defined as a
federal corporation at Title 28 USC 3002(15). C. The United States is
bankrupt pursuant to Perry v. United States, 294 US 330-381 (1935); 79 L.
Ed 912. D. United States is an obligor/grantor to the Federal Reserve
Bank pursuant to the Federal Reserve Bank Act of December 23,1913,38 Stat
265, Ch 6. E. The said Federal Reserve Bank Act comprises a contractual
granting by Congress to the Federal Reserve Bank of a paramount and
enduring (ex-warranto 1913-1933) lien on the assets of the United States
and all parties who would use bank notes issued by the Federal Reserve
Bank pursuant to 38 Stat 265, Ch 6 p266267.
P age |3
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
F. The Congress of the United States, by authority of the Gold Bullion
Coin Act of 1985, Pub. L 99-185, December 17, 1985, 99 Stat 1177 has
decreed its intention that all Americans can no longer be forced into an
obligor/grantor status in relation to said Federal Reserve Bank Notes. G.
The Constitution for the united States of America, 1787, Article I,
Section 4, Clause 2 (1856) states that Congress shall assemble at least
once in every year, which shall be the first Monday of December,
Notwithstanding, Amendment XX, Section 2 (1933) states: "The Congress
shall assemble at least once in every year, and that such meeting shall
begin at noon on the third day of January, unless they by law appoint a
different day." 14. The Constitution cannot be in conflict with itself.
The de jure legislature of the united States of America identified as
"Congress" in the aforementioned Article I, Section 4, Clause 2 (1856)
adjourned "sine die" in 1861. Evidence of its reconvening in the absence
of a congressional quorum has not been exhibited by the United States.
The national legislative body discernible in Amendment XX, Section 2
first appeared in 1863 by executive resolution as a department of the
Executive Branch of government pursuant to "Emergency War Powers." This
de facto "Congress" was conceived and continues to sit at the pleasure of
the president of the corporate ens legis UNITED STATES. 15. The de jure
private Moors who, by their inherent character in rerum natura, are
foreign to and wholly without the corporate ens legis United States are
not subject to the actions, acts and whims of the ens legis Congress of
the corporate UNITED STATES. Accordingly, living Men in rerum natura are
not subject to the Federal Reserve Bank Act of December 23, 1913 which
wants for force and effect of law in the Original Jurisdiction.
16. Disclosure of the facts and frauds stated herein has been denied to
Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) in his rightful capacity as
beneficiary of the Original Jurisdiction by an extraordinary and
persistent policy of covin, conspiracy, and collusion constructed and
condoned by the UNITED STATES Congress, Amendment XX, the Federal Reserve
Bank/System, and contractors, agents, assigns, successors, heirs,
representatives, obligors and grantors thereof. 17. It is well settled in
law that "no right, ratification or other means, can arise out of fraud."
18. By this PUBLIC NOTICE, DECLARATIONS AND LAWFUL PROTEST, the following
addendum is attached by reference herein in its entirety to any and all
Federal Reserve Notes, public policy instruments, and documents
regardless of kind arising from or relating to the Federal Reserve
Bank/System which are held, received or used by Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel.
Wendell L. Brown) now and in perpetuity: "The use of this
instrument/conveyance by Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is of
necessity only and Under Lawful Protest, nunc pro tunc to December 23,
1913, in the absence of a reasonable alternative." 19. The labor of Menes
Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) is measured and valued quantum merit
exclusively, in gold and silver coin. As the value of such labor is
tangible, it cannot be measured by any instrument which serves as
evidence of debt, notwithstanding that the operational currency of the
corporate UNITED STATES consists exclusively of instruments noted thereon
to be evidence of liability.
P age |4
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
20. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) hereby expressly states his
intention to pay, extinguish and satisfy all of His obligations and make
all parties whole. Accordingly, Menes Ankh-El specifically disavows the
use of "discharge" as a fraudulent transaction which implies payment but
serves to covertly transfer the debts of Menes Ankh-El to other parties
contrary to Menes Ankh-Els held beliefs. 21. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel.
Wendell L. Brown) is not now and has never been a United States Citizen
under the Fourteenth Amendment of the ens legis Constitution for the
corporate UNITED STATES, notwithstanding any failures to properly pass
the said amendment into law. 22. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L.
Brown) has the absolute unalienable Divine right to keep and bear arms of
any kind for protection of Self, family, and neighbors, by His own will
and this DECLARATION. 23. Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has
the absolute unalienable Divine right to move and travel upon all public
roadways in America, of whatever kind and nature, in whatever mode,
carriage or conveyance of transportation He may choose, without license
or permission or any other infringement of that right, by His own will
and this DECLARATION. 24. In addition to all of the above, Menes Ankh-El
(ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) retains all of the Rights as enumerated and
protected by the constitutions, bills of rights, and ordinance pursuant
to the Original Jurisdiction.
LAWFUL PROTEST
25. As it is a crime to conceal a crime and a fraud to conceal a fraud,
Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) makes Lawful Protest against,
abjures, denounces, refuses, takes exception and does not assent to: 26.
The formation of any institutional, bifurcated, public, cestui que trust
in violation of the copyright of Menes AnkhEl (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown)
previously declared herein. 27. Any allegation or presumption that Menes
Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has consented expressly or tacitly to
being a Citizen pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment of the ens legis
Constitution of the UNITED STATES. 28. Any pledge, mortgage, lien or
encumbrance by the Council of State Governors, March 6, 1933 which would
identify Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) as a security, surety,
co-surety or collateral for any part or portion of the public debt which
has been hypothecated by the use of counterfeited Federal Reserve
securities. 29. The forced involuntary use of U.S. funds such as Federal
Reserve Bank/System notes, commercial liability instruments and
electronic liability transactions as part of a scheme to compel the
principals to impart artificial commodity value to the liability
evidenced thereon, on the authority of MacLeod v. Hoover, (June 22. 1925)
No. 26395, S. Ct. Louisiana; 105 S. Rep. 305, that court citing U.S. Bank
v. Bank of Georgia. 23 U.S. 333, 10 W heat, 333, 6 L. Ed. 34.
P age |5
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
30. Any presumption that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has
volunteered to be a debtor in possession of Federal Reserve Notes with
expectation of a quid pro quo; a guarantor/surety/co-surety on the lien
created by the Federal Reserve Bank Act of December 23, 1913; a party to
any confidence game, scheme, forced cestui que use whereby paper wanting
inherent value is placed into circulation by the Federal Reserve Banks in
lieu of Constitutionally required gold or silver; a party to the failure
of public officials and Federal Reserve principles to provide full
disclosure of the liabilities and perils of using private scrip,
instruments of debt, corporate U.S. obligations, and Federal Reserve
Notes as inauthentic replacements for lawful money. 31. Any presumption
that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has at any time expressed
or implied a promise to guarantee the debt hypothecated by the said
Federal Reserve Act, the private debt of the corporate UNITED STATES, or
any obligations of the Federal Reserve Banks, agents, contractors,
assigns, successors, heirs and grantors thereof, now and in perpetuity.
32. Any presumption that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) has at
any time volunteered expressly or tacitly to join as a co-conspirator in
any fraud, conspiracy, covin, collusion, confederation or joint business
Venture operated by the de facto STATE OF INDIANA and the corporate ens
legis UNITED STATES as a surety, co-surety, guarantor or other obligor.
33. Any attempt to induce Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) to
act as a tort feasor to the Constitution for the united States of
America, anno Domini 1787, where at Article I, Section 10, it states "No
state shall ...emit bills of credit; make anything but Gold and Silver
Coin a tender in payment of debts," all such offers being refused for
fraud. 34. Pursuant to the Original Grant of Depositum for Bailment via
the 1789 Constitution of Indiana, Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L.
Brown) makes Lawful Protest against, abjures, denounces, refuses, takes.
exception and does not assent to the calculated use of legal fictions to
undermine and convert the political Will of the People on the free soil
of the organic country known as Indiana into a legislative democracy that
transforms the free People into subjects of the municipal law of
foreigners within the geographical exterior boundary of Indiana and
contrary to the Northwest Ordinance and the original Grant of the People,
September 17, 1787, anno Domini, as amended 1791, anno Domini.
DEMANDS
35. DEMAND IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY MADE TO IMMEDIATELY: 36. RETURN THE
DEPOITUM FOR BAILMENT to Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) in His
capacity as descendent by blood of the original Bailor/Grantor/Settlor
and His endowment to warrant same by the Universe, pursuant to the terms,
conditions, stipulations, exceptions and reservations contained within
the Original Grant. 37. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, RECOGNITION AND RETURN BY THE
BAILEE OF THE SAID DEPOSITUM OF BAILMENT to Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel.
Wendell L. Brown) as repository trustee for the Original public Trust.
38. EXHIBIT THE AUTHORITY whereby Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L.
Brown) can be compelled, forced or enticed to falsely act as a tort
feasor to Article 1, Section 10, Clause I of the Original Grant against
his will by
P age |6
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
using the aforementioned fictional bank notes within a scheme of
discharge disguised as payment. Failure to so exhibit within thirty (30)
days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises stipulation that no such authority
exists. 39. EXHIBIT THE AUTHORITY whereby Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell
L. Brown) can be compelled forced or enticed to falsely present himself
as a United States Citizen/person in violation of the Thirteenth
Amendment prohibition against slavery and involuntary servitude. Failure
to do so exhibit within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises
stipulation that no such authority exists. 40. ADMIT OR DENY that all
actions of the UNITED STATES, the STATE OF INDIANA and all political
subdivisions thereof whether judicial, administrative, municipal, county
or otherwise are by their nature actions indebitatus assumpsit. Failure
to respond within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises admission
of an ongoing Fraud against the beneficiaries of the Original
Jurisdiction.
"Suits as well as transfers may be the protective coverings of fraud,"
Steelman v. All Continent Corp., 301 US 278, 81 L. Ed 1085: Shapiro v.
Wilgus, 287 U.S. 348, 355, 53 S. Ct. 142, 144,85 AL.R. 128. "The fact
that the means employed to effect the Fraudulent conveyance was the
judgment of a court and not a voluntary transfer does not remove the
taint of illegality." First National Bank v. Flershem. 290 US 504, 78 L.
Ed, 465. ...it is obvious that the fraud did not occur in open court nor
in that sense enter into the decrees under attack, hence the fraud of
which we complain was not susceptible to insulation. In the language of
Shapiro v. Wilgus, 287 US 348, 77 L. Ed 355. It was part and parcel to a
scheme whereby the form of a judicial remedy was to supply a protective
cover for a fraudulent design." Also, Steelman, supra Flersham, supra,
Braun, supra., "'That in the absence of an adversary trial or decision
the distinction between extrinsic and intrinsic fraud becomes immaterial
and made clear by the following from Throckmorton opinion,"98 US 61. 65.
Braun, supra.
41. EXHIBIT VERIFIED EVIDENCE proving the time, place and nature of full
disclosure of the benefits, risks and perils by which Menes Ankh-El (ex.
rel. Wendell L. Brown) could knowingly volunteer to submit to the Federal
Reserve Bank Act of 1913. Failure to so exhibit within thirty (30) days
of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises stipulation that no such disclosure was made.
42. ADMIT OR DENY that Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) did in
fact knowingly and voluntarily ratify the cestui que trust created by the
UNITED STATES through the Federal Reserve Bank Act of 1913 which resulted
in the use of grammatical derivations of Menes Ankh-Els nomen in a
scheme of intentional misnomer for profit and gain. Failure to respond
within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises denial that the cestui
que trust created by the UNITED STATES through the Federal Reserve Bank
Act of 1913 was ever duly ratified by Menes Ankh-El and any assumption of
such ratification is false. 43. EXHIBIT VERIFIED EVIDENCE proving the
knowledgeable and voluntary ratification and acceptance by Menes Ankh-El
(ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) of the aforesaid cestui que trust. Failure to
so exhibit within thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises stipulation
that the said cestui que trust was never ratified by Menes Ankh-El and
any assumption of such ratification is false. 44. EXHIBIT VERIFIED
EVIDENCE proving the granting of a copyright license by Menes Ankh-El
(ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) expressly conveying to the licensee the
authority to use the grammatical derivations of the proper name belonging
to Menes Ankh-El in a scheme of intentional misnomer for profit and gain
through an unauthorized cestui que trust. Failure to respond within
thirty (30) days of PUBLIC NOTICE comprises stipulation that all such
misnomers and uses of the aforesaid cestui que trust comprise intentional
copyright infringement.
P age |7
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
45. I, Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown), do hereby deny having
received disclosure of the existence, benefits, risks and perils of a
cestui que trust named derivatively at any time, or having been asked to
ratify the said trust. Consequently, I do hereby deny, denounce, adjure
and disavow having ever ratified any such trust.
CAVEAT----LAW
46. All public officials, Officers of government bodies politic, in all
branches/departments, Executive, Legislative, or Judicial, being of Oath
of Office, bonded to fidelity, are under ministerial duty, Supervisors v.
United States ex reI. 71 U.S. 435,4 Wall 435, U.S. v. Thomas, 15 Wall
337, U.S. v Lee, 106, US 196, 1 S. Ct 240, fiduciary/trustees, U.S. v
Carter, 217 US 286, 30 S. Ct 515, "The implication of a trust is the
implication of every duty proper to a trust ... Whoever is a fiduciary or
in conscience chargeable as a fiduciary is expected to live up to them."
Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co. 289 US 227, 237: 77 L. 'Ed 1140, 1146,
cited Braun v. Hamen, 103 P 2d 685 (1939), wherein it further states
"Being fiduciaries, the ordinary rules of evidence are reversed", must
obey the law, Butz v. Economou, (US) 98 S Ct. 2895, Davis v Passman
(1979, US) 442 US 226, 99 S. Ct. 2264. 47. "The law will protect an
individual who, in the prosecution of a right does everything which the
law requires him to do but fails to obtain his right by the misconduct or
neglect of a public officer," Lyle v. Arkansas, 9 Howe 314, 13 L. Ed 153,
Duluth & Iron Range Co. v Roy, 173 US 587, 19 S. Ct549, 43 L. Ed 820. "It
is a maxim of the law, admitting few if any exceptions, that every duty
laid upon a public officer for the benefit of a private person, is
enforceable by judicial process". Butterworth v U.S. ex reI. Hoe, 112 US
50, 55. Ct. 25, 28 L. Ed 656. 48. "A ministerial officer is liable for an
injury done, where his acts are clearly against the law." Tracy v.
Swartwout, JO Pet. 80, 9 L. Ed 354. "The judicially fashioned doctrine of
official immunity of judicial, legislative or executive orders does not
reach so far as to immunize criminal conduct prescribed by an Act of
Congress." O'Sheav. Littleton, 414 US 488, 94 S. Ct. 669, "in equity.
there are certain rules prohibiting parties bearing such relations enter
into contracts with each other, courts of equity presume them to be
fraudulent, and convert fraudulent party into a trustee." Perry on Trusts
(7th Ed) Sec. 194, in Braun v Hansen (1939) 103 F 2d 685, Under the
doctrines of res gestue, res ipsa loquitur, respondeat superior, as now
having prior knowledge, authority, power, opportunity to prevent or aid
in preventing injury, damage having been or about to be committed. Title
42 U.S.C. Section 1986, as applies to public officials, Officers, by the
existence of an agreement between two or more persons, acting in a
private conspiracy, through said conspiracy, to impede or hinder,
obstruct or defeat the due course of justice in a State or Territory.
with the purposeful intent to deny the equal protection of the law, under
color of State law or authority, or other, Griffin v. Breckenridge (197
I) 403 US 88, 91 S Ct. 1790, depriving of having or exercising a Right,
Federal Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice Act (Title 42 USCS Section
1985(2), deprivation of due process, even by federal officials, Williams
v. Wright (1976). 49. From Perry on Trusts, (7th ed), Sec. 851 " ... in
order that the release, confirmation, waiver, or acquiescence may have
any effect .... The cestui que trustmust also know the Law, and what his
rights are, and how they would be dealt with by the court." The Supreme
Court of Arizona in Garrett v Reid Cashion Land, 34 Ariz 245, 270 P. 3044
at page 1052 quotes thus from Adair v Brimmer, 74 NY 539 "Confirmation
and ratification imply to legal minds, knowledge of a defect in the act
to be confirmed, and the right to reject or ratify it. The cestui que
trust must therefore not only have been acquainted with the facts, but
appraised by the law, of how these facts would be dealt with by a court
of equity. All that is implied in the act of ratification, when set up in
equity by a trustee against his cestui que trust, must be proved, and
will not be assumed. The maxim 'ignorantis legis excusat neminem' cannot
be invoked in such a case. The cestui que trust must be shown to have
been apprised of his
P age |8
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
legal rights." (Emphasis added.) Also from Ungrich v Ungrich 115 NYS 413,
417, "The rule (is) that to fasten ratification upon a cestui que trust
he must not only have been acquainted with all the facts, but apprised
also in the law, and how such facts would be dealt with by a court of
equity." Likewise, Thaw v Thaw, 27 Fed 2d 729, US v Carter, 217 US 286,
54 L Ed 769, Wendt v Fisher (Cardozo, J.) 234 NY 439, 154 N.E. 303, Leach
v Leach, 65 Wis. 284, 26 NW 754. 50. The delay in discovery of the Frauds
stated herein pursuant to Amendment XX provides no defense to the remedy,
laches or otherwise. Michaud v Girod, 4 How 503, @ 561, II LEd 1076,
Pomeroy's Equity, Sec. 847, Wiget v Rockwood 69 F @d326,etseq., and from
Texas & Pacific Ry, v Pottorff, 291 US 245, 78 L Ed 777, in Braun, supra,
"the doctrine is thus affirmed. It is the settled doctrine of this court
that no rights arise on an ultra vires contract, even though the contract
has been performed; and this conclusion cannot be circumvented by
erecting and estoppel which would prevent challenging the legality of a
power exercised." And from US v Grossmayer, 9 Wall 72, 19 L Ed 6 27, "A
transaction originally unlawful cannot be made any better by being
ratified." And, further, following Braun, supra, "It is held axiomatic
that no right, by ratification or other means, can arise out of a fraud,"
13 C.J. 492, Sec. 440, 6 R.C. L. p 698, the following is quoted in
Thompson on Corporations, 3'" Ed Sec. 2828, from Central Transportation
Co. v Pullman Palace Car Co., 139 US 24, as established doctrine of the
Supreme Court, "No performance of either side can give the lawful
contract any validity, or be the foundation of any right of action upon
it." As said long ago by the great Justice Story in Prevost v Gratz, 6
Wheat 481,497; 5 L Ed 311, 315. "It is currently true that length of time
is no bar to a trust clearly established; and in a case where fraud is
imputed and proved, length of time ought not, upon principles of eternal
justice, to be admitted to repel relief, On the contrary, it would seem
that the length of time during which the fraud has been successfully
concealed and practiced, is rather an aggravation of the offense, and
calls more loudly upon a court of equity to grant ample and decisive
relief," (Emphasis added.) 51. It is a maxim of law that peonage and
involuntary servitude are forbidden, and immunity is denied to any party,
real or imagined, person or public official who would or conspire to
traffic in slaves or participate in aiding or abetting, Clyatt v US, 197
US 207 (1905), Plessy v Ferguson, 163 US 537, 542, "Whoever [Title 18
U.S.C. See 1581] holds or returns any person to a condition of peonage,
or arrests any person with the intent of placing him in or returning him
to a condition of peonage, shall be fined not more than $5,000.00 or
imprisoned not more than five years." 52. All public officials in receipt
of this notice are required by their Oath of Office to answer,
Notification of legal responsibility is "the first essential of due
process of law" Connally v General Construction Co, 269 U.S. 385, 391.
"Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral
duty to speak or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally
misleading." U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d. 297. It is the ministerial
fiduciary/trustee duty of each and every government official, officer,
agent, contractor and assign of tile UNITED STATES, THE STATE OF INDIANA,
the Federal Reserve Bank/System, the International Monetary Fund, the
International Finance Corporation, the International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, the
World Bank, the Commission of the European Communities, the Organization
for Economic Co-operation and Development, the United Nations and any and
all other obligors/grantors who view this notice ("Respondents") to
timely and fully answer, Federal Crop Insurance v Merrill (1947) 332 US
380., 92 L Ed 10,68 S Ct I, 175 ALR 1075. 53. The period for Respondents
to respond to this notice is thirty (30) days. Any party or public
official wishing to answer, respond, refute, rebut, deny, object or
protest any statement, term, declaration, denial or provision in
P age |9
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
this presentment must do so by Lawful Protest within thirty (30) days of
the date of issuance or forever lose all rights, titles, interests, and
the opportunity to plead. All such responses must be verified and have
exhibitions and factual evidence in support of annexed thereto. 54.
Respondents may agree with all statements, terms, declarations, denials,
and provisions herein by remaining silent. Failure to timely respond to
all such terms and provisions with which Respondents disagree comprises
Respondents' stipulation and confession jointly and severally to
acceptance of all statements, terms, declarations, denials and provisions
herein as facts, the whole truth, correct and fully binding on all
parties. 55. This document serves as Notice of Fault in the event
Respondents fail to timely respond. 56. Notice of Default shall be issued
no sooner than three (3) days after Notice of Fault. Default is final
three (3) days after Notice of Fault is issued. Default comprises
Respondents consent jointly and severally to be named as defendants(s) in
various actions, administrative and judicial. 57. Upon Default, all
matters are settled res judicata and stare decisis. 58. Default comprises
an estoppel of all actions, administrative and judicial, by Respondents
against the Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown), 3J,
Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence Section 805, p. 192, Restatement 2d of
Torts Section 894 (I) (1979), and now reasonably relied on, Wilbur
National Bank v US 294 US 120, 124-125 (1935), due to misconduct by
Government agents Heckler v Community Health Services, 467 US 51, at 59,
60, Federal Crop ins., supra. "It [the doctrine of Estoppel by Silence)
arises where a person is under duty to another to speak or failure to
speak is inconsistent with honest dealings." In Re McArdles Estate, 140
Misc. 257, et seq., and Silence, to work estoppel, must amount to bad
faith, Wise v USDC Ky., 38 F Supp 13'0, 134, where duty and opportunity
to speak, Codd v Westchester Fire Ins. Co. 14 Wash. 2d 600,128 P 2d
600,128 P 2d 968,151 ALR 316, creating ignorance of facts, Cushing v US
Mas s. 18 F Supp 83, inducing person claiming estoppel to alter his
position, Braunch v. Freking, 219 Iowa 556, 258 NW 892, knowledge of
facts and of rights by person estopped, Harvey v Richard, 200 La. 97, 7
So. 2d 674, willful! or culpable silence, Lenconi v Fidelity Trust &
Savings Bank of Fresno, 96 Cal. App. 490, 273 P. 103 et seq., Silence"
implies knowledge, and an opportunity to act upon it, Pence v Langdon, 99
US 78@ 581, et seq.
P a g e | 10
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
In the matter of 'Rights of Parties' and, 'Rights of Property', this
instrument obtains justice for the Natural Divine Being Manifest in Human
Flesh, Ipso Jure Moorish National, the princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel.
Wendell L. Brown), and intends to remedy these wrongs by addressing
Personum Jurisdiction, which is jurisdiction over the person. Operating
and navigating in a colorable status is dishonorable and injurious to the
Natural Divine Being Manifest In Human Flesh. This agreement between THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the king: Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L.
Brown) is forever cured as princeps: Menes Ankh-El is not a minor; not a
ward of the state; and is competent from this day forth to take his seat
amongst the affairs of Men and handle the affairs of his Nation the
Moors of Northwest Amexem Northwest Africa North America North
Gate. This transfer invokes his unalienable /inalienable secured rights
and authority as a lord bailiff , Moor and AI Maurikanos Estados National
and beneficiary: 1. Our Authority Copy Book 5-21, FILE #5-39, Record
Group 147 (National Archives), Social Security Administration Form
7003. 2. United States Supreme Court: Supreme Law Acts of State 3.
United States Republic Constitution: Article III (3), Section two (2),
Amendment V (5) (Liberty clause) and Amendment IX (9) (Reservation of the
Rights of the People). 4. Universal Declaration of Human Rights United
Nations Human Rights [Article Fifteen (15)J . . 5. Rights of Indigenous
Peoples UN: General Assembly Part 1, Article 4. 6. Treaty of
Marrakesh[Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1786/1836 7. The Declaration
of the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and People United
Nations General Assembly #1514 8. The American Declaration of the Rights
and Duties of Man (Adopted by the Ninth International Conference of
American States Bogota, Columbia, 1948 at Article 5, Article 17, Article
26.) 9. Declaration on the Principles of International Law 10. United
States Classified Code: Title 22. Foreign Relations And Intercourse, Page
954, Chapter 2: Consular Courts, General Jurisdiction; Sections 141-143.
11. Divine Instructions CHAPTER XLVII of The Holy Koran of The Moorish
Science Holy Temple of Science verses 6-11. 12. United States Republic
Constitution: Thirteenth Amendment withal twenty sections, specifically
complete implementations of Sections Sixteen and Seventeen of said
Amendment(38th Congress, 1st Session), Published Saturday April 9, 1864
The Congressional Globe, New Series No. 94, by John C. Rives, Washington,
D.C. 13. Resolution Number Seventy-Five (75): Dated Apdll7, 1933 A.D.
(Moorish-American Society of Philadelphia and The Use of Their Names) 14.
The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (Adopted' by
the Ninth International Conference of American States Bogota, Columbia,
1948 at Article 5, Article 17, Article 26.) 15. Executive Order Number:
13107,63, Federal Register, 68,991 (1998) -Implementation of Human Rights
Treaties 16. Declaration on the Principles of International Law 17. The
Divine Constitution By-Laws of Moorish America; Acts IV, V and VI 18.
Constitution of The State of Illinois, Adopted in Convention at
Springfield, September 3,1970.,Ratified by the People, December 15,1970.
In force July I, 1971. Article VII, Section 6.Powers of Home Rule Units
DISCLAIMER
THE QUOTATION OF THE PRIVATELY COPYRIGHTED STATUTORY LEGISLATIVELY
CREATED CASE LAW AND STATE AND FEDERAL STATUTES PURSUANT TO PL 88-244,
DECEMBER 30, 1963, IS DONE WITHOUT INTENT TO CREATE A "USE", VIOLATE ANY
PRIVATE COPYRIGHT, OR GIVE LEGAL ADVICE TO ANYONE, AND STANDS SO UNLESS
LAWFULLY PROTESTED BY ANY CONCERNED PARTY(IES). 59. Notice to principal
is notice to all agents. Notice to an agent is notice to all principals.
By this Public Notice, Declarations, and Lawful Protests the world is now
informed. 60. This action is bonded by a third party surety holding
twenty-one dollars in silver coinage, .999 fine, minted by the American
Treasury, United States of America. pre-1933 issue. The said bond is
annexed hereto and incorporated verbatim herein in its entirety by
reference as if fully reproduced herein. 61. The use of a notary public
herein is of necessity and under LAWFUL PROTEST without the creating or
implying the existence of any contract or contracts between Princeps:
Menes Ankh-El (ex. rel. Wendell L. Brown) and any other parties, legal
entities, the UNITED STATES, the STATE OF INDIANA or agents thereof,
public or private. BE IT SO EXECUTED, and by this execution, be made to
appear, in-deed, enacted, decreed, This the __________ day of the
______________________month, anno Domini, two thousand and twelve.
L.S.___________________________________
Signed in correct public capacity as Beneficiary
JURAT
P a g e | 12
Moorish Americans Northwest Amexem
Menes Ankh-El, in propria persona, sui heredes c/o P.O. BOX 88045 Marion
County, Indiana [46208] COUNTY OF MARION STATE OF INDIANA ) )ss: )
Before me, a notary public in and for the said City and territory,
personally appeared the above named; the Princeps: Menes Ankh-El (ex.
rel. Wendell L. Brown) who acknowledged that he did sign the foregoing
instrument, Moorish Deed Of Secondary Conveyance or Incorporeal
Hereditaments, and that the same is his free and voluntary act and deed.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal this
_____day of ______________, 2012. My commission
expires______________________
#_______________
P a g e | 13