4–15 Solutions to Exercises
Homework Exercises for Chapter 4
Solutions
EXERCISE 4.1
Transforming the weak-BE integral by parts as before:
L
κ
(M ) δw d x = M κ δw d x − M κ δθ w − V κ δw , (E4.5)
0 B B
and adding to the other weak relations we get
L L
w κ κ
(M δκ + M δw − M δκ) d x − q δw d x − M̂ δθ w − V̂ δw , (E4.6)
0 0 B B
L L L
The integral (M w δκ + M κ δw ) d x is the variation of 8 M w κ d x whereas the integral −M κ δκ d x
0 L 0 0
is the variation of − 2 1
0
M κ κ d x. Therefore the required functional is
L L
w
[w, κ] = (M − 1
2
Mκ) κ dx − w
q w d x − M̂ θ − V̂ w . (E4.7)
0 0 B B
to which the one given in the Exercise statement can be contracted. If the PBC is made weak the following
additional boundary term appears:
(ŵ − w) V κ + (θ̂ − θ w ) M κ . (E4.8)
A A
EXERCISE 4.2
Integrating U by parts:
L L L
2
U= 1
2
E I (w ) d x = 1
2
Mw d x = 1
2
M w dx + 1
2
Mw − 2 M w
1
(E4.9)
0 0 0 B B
At equilibrium M = q, M̂ = M| B and V̂ = −M | B , which substituted in the above gives
L
U= 1
2
qw d x + 12 M̂w + 12 V̂ w = 12 W. (E4.10)
0 B B
EXERCISE 4.3
To be done. (not assigned so far)
L L L L
8 Proof: δ 0 M w κ d x = δ 0 (M w δκ + δ M w κ )d x = 0
(M w δκ + M κ δκ w )d x = 0
(M w δκ + M κ δw )d x. The
tricky part is M w κ = E I w κ = E I κw = M κ κ w .
4–15
Chapter 4: THE BERNOULLI-EULER BEAM 4–16
EXERCISE 4.4
Transforming the weak-BE integral by parts:
L
(M κ ) δw d x = M κ δw d x − M κ δθ w − V κ δw , (E4.11)
0 B B
and adding to the other weak relations we get
L L L
w κ κ
(M − M ) δκ d x + M δw d x − q δw d x − M̂ δθ w − V̂ δw , (E4.12)
0 0 0 B B
The first integral is the variation of
L
(M κ κ − 12 M κ κ) d x, (E4.13)
0
whereas the second is the variation of
L L L L
κ
M w dx = E Iκ w dx = E I w κ dx = M w κ d x. (E4.14)
0 0 0 0
Therefore the required functional is
L L L
κ w κ w
[w, κ] = 1
2
M κ dx + (M − M ) κ d x − q w d x − M̂ θ − V̂ w , (E4.15)
0 0 0 B B
as in the Exercise statement. This may be further contracted to
L L
w
[w, κ] = (M − 1
2
Mκ) κ dx − q w d x − M̂ θ w − V̂ w . (E4.16)
0 0 B B
If the PBC is made weak the following additional boundary term appears:
(ŵ − w) V κ + (θ̂ − θ w ) M κ . (E4.17)
A A
The derivation is very similar to that of Exercise 4.1 and gives
L
1 κ w
L
[w, κ, M] = 2
M κ + M(κ − κ) d x − qw d x − M̂θ w − V̂ w . (E4.18)
0 0 B B
Note: there is an infinite number of three-field functionals and associated weak forms. The one shown above
leads to the historically important Hu-Washizu functional. If you start from a different diagram you may arrive
at another three-field functional.
4–16