0% found this document useful (0 votes)
237 views6 pages

Diversity of Butterflies - Lepidoptera Insecta - From New Nagzira Wildlife Sanctuary Zone III in NNTR, Maharashtra, India

Diversity of Butterflies _Lepidoptera Insecta_ From New Nagzira Wildlife Sanctuary Zone III in NNTR, Maharashtra, India
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
237 views6 pages

Diversity of Butterflies - Lepidoptera Insecta - From New Nagzira Wildlife Sanctuary Zone III in NNTR, Maharashtra, India

Diversity of Butterflies _Lepidoptera Insecta_ From New Nagzira Wildlife Sanctuary Zone III in NNTR, Maharashtra, India
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

`

ESSENC
CE - Interna
ational Jourrnal for Envvironmentaal Rehabilitaation and Conservation
n
Volume VI: No. 1 2015 [103
[ – 108] [ISS
SN 0975 - 62722]
[ww
ww.essence-jouurnal.com]

Diversiity of butteerflies (Leepidopteraa: Insecta)) from New


w Nagziraa Wildlife
Sanctuaary: Zonee III in NN NTR, Mahaarashtra, India

Bhandarrkar, S.V.1 and


a Paliwall, G.T. 2

Received: March 11, 2015


2 ⏐ Accep
pted: April 255, 2015 ⏐ Onlline: June 30,, 2015

Abstractt Intrroduction
Buttterflies are beautifuul and atttractive,
A study on diversity y of the Buutterfly speccies
valuuable pollinnators, they gather necctar and
was carrried out at a New Naagzira wildllife
perfforms imporrtant role inn food chaiin. They
Sanctuaryy: Zone IIII in NNTR R (Navegaoon-
are also goodd indicators of enviroonmental
Nagzira Tiger Reeserve) District Gondia
quaality as they are sensitivve to changees in the
Maharashhtra India in n the month of Novembber,
envvironment (S Sharma and Joshi, 20099). From
2014. A total of 25 5 species belonging
b too 5
families of order Lep the time immem morial, buttterflies havee always
pidoptera weere reported.. In
the preseent study butterfly fasccinated humaankind. Amoong insects, they are
b speecies diverssity
certtainly the most
m populaar and bestt known
were reported in the familyy Hesperiiddae,
grouup and that is
i probably whyw they aree among
Papilioniidae, Pieridae,
P Lycaeniddae,
Nymphallidae in wh hich family Nymphaliddae the most studiedd insect. Theere was a tim me when
buttterflies were collected by hobbyiists like
were doominant wiith 14 species under 6
posttage stampps. Much informatioon was
subfamilies. From the t conservation point of
gennerated durring that period onn their
view, thee study area is undisturbbed and richh in
taxoonomy, miigration, variation,
v m
mimicry,
flora andd fauna. Thiss documentattion on speccies
specciation andd evolutionaary biologyy, today
diversity of Butterflyy will be helpful for bettter
seveeral speciess of butterrflies are used u by
conservaation and management
m t planning of
connservation biiologists as indicator sppecies to
biodiverssity.
idenntify habitatss that are criitical and neeed to be
Keyword ds: Butterfly
y | species diversity
d | New
N
prottected. Buttterflies are also monittored to
Nagzira | conservatio
on
indiicate climatte change and enviroonmental
For corresspondence: deggradation. Thus,
T like other anim mals and
1
2
Dept. of Zoology,
Z M. B. Patel
P College, Deeori. Gondia birdds. Butterfliies are now w studied as living
Dept. of Zoology,
Z S. S. Jaiiswal College, Arjuni/Mor.
A Gonndia
Email: [email protected] ecollogical com mponents (Kehimkar,
( 2011).
103
wal /Vol. VI [11] 2015/103 – 108 
Bhanndarkar & Paliw

Some of o the im mportant coontribution in bioddiversity butt due to habbitat destructtion, use
butterfliees studies are de Niceville(188
N 86), of pesticides,
p p
pesticides annd occasionaal fire in
Marshalll & de Niiceville (18882), Swinhhoe foreest and trading, manyy species come c in
(1893,), Bingham (1905), Evans E (19332), enddangered caategory. The presentt study
Heppner (1998), Ku unte (2000), Mathew and a document the diversity
d of butterflies
b foor better
Rahamatthulla (1993)), Lewis (19973), Sharmaa et mannagement planning and conservation
c n of area
al. (20066), Kehimkarr (2008), Shaarma and Jooshi in New
N Nagziraa wildlife sannctuary in NNTR.
N
(2009), Tiple
T and Kh
hurad (2009)), Tiple (20111),
Kasambee (2012) etc. India has a rich butterrfly

S. Noo. Commoon Name Scientific nam


me
Familyy Hesperiida ae
Subfammily: Hespeeriinae
1 Indian Palm
P Bob S
Suastus grem
mius F.
Familyy Papilionid
dae
Subfammily: Papilioninae
2 Commo on Mormon Papillio Polyytes L.
P
3 Lime Butterfly P
Papilio demooleus L.
4 Commo on Rose A
Atrophaneura a aristolochiae F.
5 Malabaar Rose A
Atrophaneura a pandiyanaa M.
Familyy Pieridae
Subfammily: Coliaddinae
6 Commo on Grass Yelllow Eurema hecaabe L.
E
7 Commo on Emigrant C
Catopsilia poomona F.
8 Mottledd Emigrant C
Catopsilia pyyranthe L.
Familyy Lycaenida ae
Subfammily: Riodinninae
9 Plum Juudy A
Abisara echeerius St.
Subfammily: Polyommmatinae
10 Indian Cupid
C Everes lacturrnus Go.
E
11 Commo on Pierrot C
Castalius rossimon F.
Familyy Nymphalidae
Subfammily: Danaiinae
12 Plain Tiiger Dnaus chrysiippus L.
D
13 Commo on Crow E
Euploea coree Cr.
Subfammily: Chara axinae
14 Commo on Nawab P
Polyura athaamas Dr.
Subfammily: Satyriinae
15 Commo on Evening Brown
B Melanitis ledda L.
M
16 Dark Evvening Browwn M
Melanitis pheedima Cr.
104 
wal /Vol. VI [11] 2015/103 – 108 
Bhanndarkar & Paliw

Subfam
mily: Helicooniinae
17 Tawny Coster A
Acraea violae F.
Subfam
mily: Limen nitinae
18 Staff seergeant Athyma selennophora K.
A
19 Commo on Sailer N
Neptis hylas L.
L
20 Commo on Baron E
Euthalia aconthea Cr.
21 Baronett E
Euthalia naiss Fo.
Subfam
mily: Nymp phalinae
22 Grey Paansy JJunonia atlitees L.
23 Danaid Eggfly H
Hypolimnas m
misippus L.
23 Chocolaate Pansy J
Junonia iphitta Cr.
25 Lemon Pansy J
Junonia lemoonias L.

Materialls and Meth hod Thee Book of Indian


I Butteerflies by Kehimkar
K
The obseervation wass based on thhe field survey. andd Butterflies in Maharashhtra by Kasam
mbe.
Butterflyy species weere capturedd with the help Study area
of net, identified
i and
a releasedd immediateely. Thee Study weree carried out near Umarzzari Gate
Many of o the speccies were photographhed. (N- 210 11’ 29..5” E- 790 56’ 6.9”), commmonly
Identificaation of thee butterflies was primarrily knoown as New Nagzira annd it was addded into
made dirrectly in thee field. Idenntification and
a Naggzira wildliffe sanctuaryy and Now it is an
classificaation of the butterflies were followwed inteegral part of Navegaon-Nagziraa Tiger
Resserve (NNTR R).

105 
wal /Vol. VI [11] 2015/103 – 108 
Bhanndarkar & Paliw

Discussioon bioddiversity (Shharma and Joshi, 20099). From


In the present
p repo
ort a total of 25 speccies the conservation point of view,
v the stuudy area
belonging to 5 famiilies of ordeer Lepidoptera is undisturbed
u a rich in flora
and fl and fauuna. This
were repported. In th he present study
s butterrfly documentation on species diversity
d of Butterfly
B
species diversity
d weere reported in the fam mily willl be helpfuul for betterr conservation and
Hesperiiddae, Paapilionidae, Pieriddae, mannagement planning
p off biodiverssity. 53
Lycaeniddae, Nymph halidae in which fam mily speccies of buutterflies weere recordeed from
Nymphallidae were dominant
d w
with 14 speccies Pohhara Malkheed Reservee Forest, Amravati
A
under 6 subfamiliees. The association in Disttrict by Kassambe & Wadatkar
W (20004); 68
butterfliees and plantss is highly specific;
s unlike speccies of buutterflies off 50 generra were
bees, buttterflies feed
d entirely onn nectar, which recoorded from Tadoba Anddhari Tiger Reserve
they obtaain through their long proboscis
p froom (Sharma & Raadhakrishnann 2006); 43 species
flower. Thus
T pollinaation, a cruccial link in the
t m the Tigerr Reserve in
from i Tadoba National
N
survival of ecosystem m, is one suuch factor thhat Parkk, Maharasshtra (Rai et al. 20006); 45
needs too be well understoodd to devellop buttterflies froom Penchh Tiger Reserve
appropriaate strategiees for conseervation of the t (Maaharashtra) by Singh (2004); 65 species

106 
wal /Vol. VI [11] 2015/103 – 108 
Bhanndarkar & Paliw

Pench Tiiger Reservee, Maharashhtra (Sharmaa & Bombayy Natural History Society,
Radhakriishnan 2004)); 45 speciess from Melghhat Mumbaii, India. 454ppp.
Tiger Reserve
R (Sh
harma & Radhakrishn
R nan Hepppner, J.B. (1998): Classificattion of
2005); 53 5 species belonging to 36 genera Lepidopptera Part 1. Introoduction.
representting seven families from Lonnar Holarctiic Lepid. (Gaainsville), 5:: 1-148.
Wildlife Sanctuary, Buldhana
B District (Sharmma Kassambe, R. & J. S. Wadatkar (2004):
2008); 51 5 butterfly y species were
w recordded Butterfliies of Poharra Malkhed Reserve
belonging to seven n families from Melghhat Forest, Amraavati District
Tiger Reeserve, Mahaarashtra (Chhandrakar et al. (Maharaashtra). Bugss ‘R’ All 7(2)): 5-6.
2007) annd many morre report from the forestt of Kunnte, K. (20000): Butterf rflies of Penninsular
Maharashhtra revealls wide biiodiversity of India. Indian
I Acaddemy of Sciences,
S
butterfliees. The sheerr numbers off insects meaans Universities Press (India) Limited.L
that theirr impact upo on the envirronment hennce 254pp.
our lives are highly significant. Insects are the
t Lewwis, H.L. (1973): Butterrflies of thee World.
major coomponent off macroscoppic biodiverssity Follett Publishing
P C
Company, C
Chicago.
and for this reason n alone we should try to 312pp.
understannd them bettter. Matthew, G. annd Rahamathhulla, V.K. (1993):
Acknowlledgement Studies on the butterflies of thhe Silent
The authhors are thaankful to thhe members of Valley National Park, Keralaa, India,
Aranyayaatri Wildlife
fe Foundatioon (AWF) for Entomonn. 18(3&4): 185-192.
valuable support duriing study. Shaarma, R.M. & C. Raddhakrishnan (2005):
Referencces Insecta: Lepidoptera (Rhopaloccera and
Bingham
m, C.L. (190 05): The fauuna of Brittish Grypoceera). Fauna of Pench National
N
Inndia includ
ding Ceylonn and Burm ma, Park. Zoological
Z Survey off India.
B
Butterfly-Vol--I. Taylor and Franncis Conservvation Area Series
S 20: 2551-274.
L
Ltd., London. 511pp. Shaarma, R.M. & C. Raddhakrishnan (2006):
Chandrakkar, M., S. Palekar & S. Chandrakkar Insecta: Lepidoptera (Rhopaloccera and
(22007): Buttterfly faunaa of Melghhat Grypoceera). Fauna of Tadoba Andhari
R
Region, Maaharashtra. Zoos’ Prrint Tiger Reserve.
R Zoological Suurvey of
Jo
Journal 22(7)): 2762-27644. India. Conservation
C n Area Serries 25:
1886): The butterflies of
de Nicevville, L. (1 255-2777.
Inndia, Burmma and Ceylon.
C Vol--II. Shaarma, R.M. (2008): Innsecta: Leppidoptera
N
Nymphalidae e, Lemoniiddae, (Rhopallocera and Grypocera).
G F
Fauna of
Libythaeinae,, Nemeoobinae. T
The Lonar Wildlife
W Sannctuary, Zooological
C
Calcutta Centtral press Coo. Ltd. 332ppp. Survey of India. Conservatioon Area
Evans, W.H.
W (19322): The ideentification of Series 37: 181-190.
Inndian Butterrflies. (2nd Edition). The
T

107 
wal /Vol. VI [11] 2015/103 – 108 
Bhanndarkar & Paliw

Singh, J. (2004): Stattus of tiger conservation


c n in Seasonaal Distributiion in and around
thhe Pench National
N Paark and Tigger Nagpur City, Cenntral India. World
R
Reserve, Maaharashtra. Proceedings
P of Journal of Zoology. 4(3): 153-162.
thhe Symposiu um on Threee Decades of Tiplle, A.D. (22011): Butteerflies of Vidarbha
V
P
Project Tigerr in Melghat 119 -133. region, Maharashttra State, central
Swinhoe, C. (1893): A list of thhe Lepidoptera India. Joournal of Thhreatened Taaxa 3(1):
of the Khasiia hills. Traans. Ent. Soc.S 1469-14477.
London. 3: 26 67-330.
Tiple, A..D. & A.M. Khurad (2009a): Butterrfly
Species Diiversity, HabitatsH a
and

108 

You might also like