Scribd
Upload
117 views

Petition 311 PDF

A petitioner filed a petition in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate in Saidapet, Chennai under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner's counsel was unable to appear in court on an unspecified date. The petitioner claims this absence was neither willful nor wanton. It is in the interest of justice and obtaining rebuttal evidence to cross-examine Prosecution Witness [PW] [number redacted] further. The petitioner requests the court permit recalling and cross-examining PW [number redacted].

Uploaded by

Husnain Ahmad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
117 views

Petition 311 PDF

A petitioner filed a petition in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate in Saidapet, Chennai under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. The petitioner's counsel was unable to appear in court on an unspecified date. The petitioner claims this absence was neither willful nor wanton. It is in the interest of justice and obtaining rebuttal evidence to cross-examine Prosecution Witness [PW] [number redacted] further. The petitioner requests the court permit recalling and cross-examining PW [number redacted].

Uploaded by

Husnain Ahmad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

IN THE COURT OF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

SAIDAPET, CHENNAI

M. P. No. of 20

In

C. C. No. of 20

… PETITIONERS/ACCUSED.

VS

.. RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT.

PETITION FILED UNDER SEC. 311 Cr.P.C.

The petitioner above named states as follows:

1. The petitioner states that his counsel on record was unable to appear before this
Hon’ble Court on

2. The petitioner states that it is neither willful nor wanton but due to the reason
stated above.

3. The petitioner states that the balance of convenience lies in his favour, further to
get rebuttal evidence from the PW – it is just and necessary to cross-examine the
PW – . Hence the petitioner shall be permitted to cross-examine the PW – .

In these circumstances it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to
permit the petitioner to reopen and recall the PW – and cross examine in the interest
of justice and thus render justice.

Dated at , this the day of , 20

Counsel for

You might also like