Scribd
Upload
1K views2 pages

Teaching Artist Evaluation Guide

This document is a teaching artist evaluation form used by schools that received grants from the Mississippi Arts Commission. It collects information about the teaching artist such as their communication, preparation, artistic quality, and time management. Schools rate the artist in these areas on a scale from 1 to 4. The form also asks if the artist's work was beneficial, and if the school would recommend the artist to another school.

Uploaded by

Marija Jovanovic
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views2 pages

Teaching Artist Evaluation Guide

This document is a teaching artist evaluation form used by schools that received grants from the Mississippi Arts Commission. It collects information about the teaching artist such as their communication, preparation, artistic quality, and time management. Schools rate the artist in these areas on a scale from 1 to 4. The form also asks if the artist's work was beneficial, and if the school would recommend the artist to another school.

Uploaded by

Marija Jovanovic
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Teaching Artist Evaluation Form _____________

Please fill out a copy of this form for each teaching artist that worked in your school during your Arts in
the Classroom or Whole Schools project over the past school year.

1. School: _____________________________________ 2. Grant number. _________________

3. Project Director: __________________________________________________

4. Teaching Artist Name: _________________________________________________

5. Is the artist a member of MAC’s Roster? Yes No

6. Has your school hired this artist in previous years? Yes No

7. Please rate the artist in the following areas (check one box per item):

Poor Superior
a. Communication Prior to Session 1 2 3 4

The artist displayed professionalism during contact prior to the work in the school, including
promptly answering phone calls or emails, sending adequate prep materials, and providing a clearly
written contractual agreement.
Comments:

b. Preparation 1 2 3 4
The artist was punctual, came prepared with all necessary items and was ready to begin work at
the start of their allotted timeslot.
Comments:

c. Artistic Quality & Knowledge 1 2 3 4


The artist displayed high artistic quality and mastery of the material they presented.
Comments:

d. Communication with Students 1 2 3 4


The artist was able to communicate effectively with students.
Comments:

(over)

Mississippi Arts Commission - Teaching Artist Evaluation Form, p. 1 of 2


e. Communication with Teachers 1 2 3 4
The artist communicated effectively with teachers and administrators.
Comments:

f. Connecting to Curriculum 1 2 3 4
The artist connected their project to specific elements of curriculum.
Comments:

g. Teaching Strategies 1 2 3 4
The artist used a variety of teaching strategies to communicate their subject material
Comments:

h. Time Management & Control of Classroom 1 2 3 4


The artist effectively managed their time in the classroom or for a workshop. They utilized
appropriate strategies for dealing with poor behavior by students.
Comments:

8. Was the artist’s work in your school beneficial for your students or faculty? Yes No
If no, please explain

9. Would you recommend this artist to another school? Yes No

Mississippi Arts Commission - Teaching Artist Evaluation Form, p. 2 of 2

You might also like