Math 210A Homework 4: Edward Burkard
Math 210A Homework 4: Edward Burkard
Edward Burkard
n 1
Exercise 1. Express the functions ez , cos z, sin z, (1 + z) , log(1 + z), and as a power series in z. Find
1 + z2
their radii of convergence.
Solution.
(a)
∞
X zn
ez =
n=0
n!
The radius of convergence is:
an
1
(n + 1)!
n! = lim n + 1 = ∞
R = lim = lim 1 = lim
n→∞ an+1 n→∞ n→∞ n! n→∞
(n+1)!
(b)
∞
X z 2n
cos z =
n=0
(2n)!
2n
z
Fix a value of z ∈ C, then letting an = (2n)! :
2n
an z (2n + 2)! (2n + 1)(2n + 2)
lim = lim = lim =∞
n→∞ an+1 n→∞ (2n)! z 2n+2 n→∞ z2
thus the radius of convergence is infinite since this holds for all z.
(c)
∞
X z 2n+1
sin z =
n=0
(2n + 1)!
2n+1
z
Fix a value of z ∈ C, then letting an = (2n+1)! :
2n+1
an
= lim z (2n + 3)!
(2n + 2)(2n + 3)
lim = lim =∞
n→∞ an+1 n→∞ (2n + 1)! z 2n+3 n→∞ z2
thus the radius of convergence is infinite since this holds for all z.
(d)
n
n
X n
(1 + z) = z k (by the binomial theorem)
k
k=0
The radius of convergence here must be infinite since this is a finite sum of powers of z.
(e)
∞
X (−1)(n−1)
log(1 + z) = z n (the Maclauren series)
n
k=0
The radius of convergence is:
an 1
n + 1
n
R = lim = lim = lim =1
n→∞ an+1 n→∞ 1 n→∞ n
n+1
(f)
∞ ∞
1 1 X
2 n
X
(−1)n z 2n (geometric series)
= = −z =
1 + z2 1 − (−z 2 )
k=0 k=0
an z n we have that the coefficients are:
P
Embedding this into a standard power series
{an }∞
n=0 = {1, 0, −1, 0, 1, 0, −1, 0, 1, 0, −1, ...}.
Thus by using Hadamard’s formula we have:
1 p
= lim sup n |an | = 1,
R
1
2
Exercise 2. Give the power series of log z about z = i and find its radius of convergence.
Solution. Using the method of Taylor series we find that:
∞
πi X −in
log z = + (z − i)n .
2 n=1
n
The radius of convergence is:
an −in
= lim n+1 = lim n + 1 = 1.
n
R = lim
n→∞ an+1 n→∞ −i n→∞ n
n+1
Exercise 3. Show that the successive derivatives of an analytic function at a point z can never satisfy f (n) (z) >
n!nn .
Solution. Let γ(t) = reit + z and suppose that f (n) (z) > n!nn . Then using the Cauchy integral formula we have:
Z
n! f (w) > n!nn .
n+1
dw
2πi
γ (w − z)
This simplifies to Z
n! f (w) > n!nn
n+1
dw
2π γ (w − z)
and further to: Z
1 f (w) > nn .
n+1
dw
2π γ (w − z)
But now we have:
Z
kf (γ(t))k∞
Z Z
1 f (w) ≤ 1 kf (γ(t))k∞ =M M M M
nn <
dw |dw| = |dw| = 2πr = n .
2π γ (w − z)n+1 2π γ rn+1 2πrn+1 γ 2πrn+1 r
√
n
!n
M M
Thus the statement has reduced to nn < n = . Since M and r are positive constants, for sufficiently
r r
√
n
M
large n this inequality will not hold (since there will eventually be an n such that n > ). Thus we have a
(n) r
n
contradiction. Therefore it is impossible for f (z) > n!n to hold.
(a)
ez ez 2πie0
Z Z
dz = dz = = 2πi
|z|=1 z |z|=1 (z − 0)0+1 0!
(b)
Z Z
sin z sin z 2πi sin(0)
dz = dz = =0
|z|=1 z |z|=1 (z − 0)0+1 0!
(c)
Z Z Z !
dz i dz dz i 2πi 2πi
= − = − =0
|z|=2 z2 + 1 2 |z|=2 z+i |z|=2 z−i 2 0! 0!
(d)
Z Z Z !
dz 1 dz dz 1 2πi 2πi
= − = − =0
|z|=2 z2 − 1 2 |z|=2 z−1 |z|=2 z+1 2 0! 0!
(e)
Z Z
sin z sin z 2πi(− sin 0)
dz = dz = =0
|z|=1 z3 |z|=1 (z − 0) 2+1 2!
(f)
ez
Z
dz (n ∈ Z)
|z|=1 zn
(n = 0)
Z
ez dz = 0
|z|=1
since ez is analytic.
(n > 0)
ez ez 2πie0
Z Z
2πi
dz = dz = =
|z|=1 zn |z|=1 (z − 0)(n−1)+1 (n − 1)! (n − 1)!
(n < 0) Let m = −n.
ez
Z Z
dz = z m ez dz = 0
|z|=1 zn |z|=1
since z m ez is analytic.
(g)
ez ez
Z Z
dz = dz (n ∈ Z)
|z|=2 (1 − z)n |z|=2 (−1)n (z − 1)n
(n = 0)
ez
Z Z
dz = ez dz = 0.
|z|=2 (−1)n (z − 1)n |z|=2
(n > 0)
ez ez 1
Z Z
n 2πie 2πie
dz = (−1)n dz = (−1) = (−1)n .
|z|=2 (−1)n (z − 1)n |z|=2 (z − 1)(n−1)+1 (n − 1)! (n − 1)!
(n < 0) Let m = −n. Then:
ez
Z Z
dz = ez (1 − z)m dz = 0
|z|=2 (−1) (z − 1)n
n
|z|=2
(i) Z
dz 1
dz where γ! (t) = 2eit , 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π, n ≥ 0, how about γ2 (t) = eit ?
1 n
γ z− 2 4
Using the Cauchy integral formula:
Z Z
dz dz 2πi 2πi
dz =
1 n (n−1)+1 = (n − 1)! (1) = (n − 1)!
γ1 z − 2 γ1 z − 1
2
where f (z) = 1.
1 1
As for the second integral, γ2 is a circle of radius centered at 0, so it completely misses the point .
4 2
Thus:
Z
dz
dz = 0.
1 n
γ2 z − 2
z2 + 1
Z
Exercise 5. Evaluate the integral dz, γ(t) = reit , 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π, for all possible values of r, 0 < r < 2
γ z(z 2 + 4)
and 2 < r < ∞.
Solution. We have:
z2 + 1
11 3 1 1
2
= + + .
z(z + 4) 4z 8 z + 2i z − 2i
Now let’s look at the two cases:
(0 < r < 2) In this case, the only pole of the integrand that lie inside the curve is 0, so:
z2 + 1
Z Z
11 3 1 1
2
dz = + + dz
γ z(z + 4) γ 4z 8 z + 2i z − 2i
Z Z Z
11 3 1 1
= dz + dz + dz
γ 4z 8 γ z + 2i γ z − 2i
1 2πi 3 πi
= + (0 + 0) = .
4 0! 8 2
(r > 2) In this case, all three poles of the integrand are inside the curve, so:
z2 + 1
Z Z
11 3 1 1
2
dz = + + dz
γ z(z + 4) γ 4z 8 z + 2i z − 2i
Z Z Z
11 3 1 1
= dz + dz + dz
γ 4z 8 γ z + 2i γ z − 2i
1 2πi 3 2πi 2πi
= + +
4 0! 8 0! 0!
πi 3πi
= + = 2πi.
2 2