0%(1)0% found this document useful (1 vote) 371 views6 pagesLife Cycle Perspective
Life cycle perspective - Environment Management System
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
arzarzot8 180 +4001: 2015 Implementation Challenges - Addrassing Life Cycle Perspective | Tiny Consultants
ISO 14001: 2015 IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES - ADDRESSING LIFE CYCLE
PERSPECTIVE
February 14, 2017 WF (http:/rwittercom/home?status-ISO 14001: 2015
Implementation Challenges - Addressing Life Cycle
Perspective | Trinity Consultants)
F nttps:/ www facebook. com/sharer/sharer,php?u-ISO
14001: 2015 Implementation Challenges - Addressing Life
Cycle Perspective | Trinity Consultants)
iin (https:// wwwiinkedin.com/shareArticle?
minietrue&url-https:// wwwtrinityconsultants.com/news/ehs-
management/iso-14001--2015-implementation-challenges—
-addressing-life-cycle-perspective&title-ISO 14001: 2015
Implementation Challenges - Addressing Life Cycle
Perspective&summary-&source-)
Rich Pandullo, Director, EHS Performance & Risk Management - Trinity Consultants, Raleigh, NC
The new ISO 14002:2015 standard incorporates several new themes as well as introduces a new
organizational structure for environmental management system (EMS) design and implementation.
Perhaps the most significant theme is the need to incorporate a life cycle perspective when evaluating
environmental aspects and developing operational controls.
Organizations seeking to align with the new standard must determine precisely what that term “life cycle
perspective" means for them. On one hand, the standard makes it clear that a formal life cycle
assessment (LCA) is not required: on the other hand, however, language in the standard and associated
guidance states the each life cycle stage must be considered when addressing EMS requirements. There
is an implication that an organization must conduct a technical analysis that in some ways resembles a
formal LCA in seeking to conform to the new standard.
What is a "Life Cycle Perspective"?
What does the standard actually say about life cycle perspective? Taking a close look at the relevant
language in several areas of the standard and associated guidance reveals why the new provisions may
be challenging. These areas are listed and discussed below.
Aspects Clause - ISO 14001:2036, Section 6.1.2
Life Cycle Definition - 1SO 14001:2015, Section 33.3
Operational Planning and Control Clause - |SO 14001:2015, Section 8.1
Annex to the ISO Standard: Environmental Aspects - ISO 140012015, Section A612
hitps/lwwwztinityconsullants.cominawslahs-managementiso-14001--2075-implementalion-challenges--addressingife-cyle-perspective 18arzarzot8 180 +4001: 2015 Implementation Challenges - Addrassing Life Cycle Perspective | Tiny Consultants
> 150 24004:2015 Implementation Guidelines
Aspects Clause
The Aspect Clause contains a concise stipulation regarding life cycle perspective with no elaboration on
the term itself, The clause reads: ‘within the defined scope of the EMS, the organization shall determine
the environmental aspects of its activities, products, and services that it can control and those it can
influence, and their associated impacts, considering a life cycle perspective" (emphasis added). The
reader should take note of the language indicating the need to examine aspects that can be controlled or
influenced, Thus, the standard implies that an organization should assess its ability to control or exert
influence over environmental aspects that may be outside its immediate operational or facility boundary.
Life Cycle Definition
In the definitions section of the
standard, the language points to a
potentially broad evaluation that
includes both upstream and
downstream activity. The language
reads: ‘consecutive and interlinked
stages of a product (or service) or
generation from raw material
acquistion or generation from
natural resources to final disposal’ jl
(emphasis added). This definition
aligns with the establishment of
boundaries typically associated with
a formal LCA
LIFECYCLE
ASSESSMENT
Operational Planning and
Control Clause
Further elaboration on the meaning
of life cycle perspective is provided in
the Operational Planning and Control clause. There are several stipulations noted, ranging from
establishing controls in product development to determining EMS requirements in procurement practices,
‘communicating EMS requirements to contractors, and sharing information regarding environmental
impacts related to downstream activity.
Specifically, the language reads: ‘consistent with a life cycle perspective, the organization shall:
> Establish controls. as appropriate, to ensure that its environmental requirement(s) is (are) addressed in
the design and development process for the product or service. considering each life cycle stage:
> Determine its environmental requirement(s) for the procurement of products and services, as
appropriate;
> Communicate its relevant environmental requirements) to external providers, including contractors:
and
hitps/lwwwztinityconsullants.cominawslahs-managementiso-14001--2075-implementalion-challenges--addressingife-cyle-perspective 2163128/2018, 150 14001: 2015 implementation Challenges - Addressing Life Cycle Perspective | Teniy Consultants
> Consider the need to provide information about potential significant environmental impacts
associated with the transportation or delivery, use, end-of-life treatment and final disposal of its
products and services*
Annex to the Standard: Environmental Aspects — Section A.6.1.2
The Annex to the Standard clearly states that a detailed LCA is not required in order to conform to ISO
14001:2015. But, the emphasis remains on examining upstream and downstream activity for a product or
service, which is described as including stages such as raw material acquisition, design, production,
transportation and delivery, use, end-of-life treatment, and final disposal. The Annex clarifies that
assessing the ability to control or influence any of the life cycle stages is what is needed primarily. The
standard remains flexible on how the stages are assessed and how the impacts associated with these
upstream and downstream activities should be incorporated into the EMS,
ISO 14004:2016 Implementation Guidelines
The ISO 14004:2016 Implementation Guidelines provide additional clarification on how a life cycle
perspective should blend into an existing environmental aspects evaluation, The Guidelines emphasize
that the organization should focus on what it can control or influence over the spectrum of stages ina
product or service. The Guidelines mention several important factors to consider:
Stage in the life cycle of the product or service
Degree of control or influence over any life cycle stages
Life of the product
Influence on the supply chain
Length of the supply chain
‘Technological complexity of the product
Putting Life Cycle Perspective into Action in an EMS
There are two important steps in adopting a life cycle perspective in evaluating environmental aspects
and developing operational controls: 1) considering all life cycle stages that can be controlled or
influenced, and 2) determining which aspects from any stage need to be addressed,
There are various supply and value chain models that would be suitable for framing an analysis of life
cycle perspective. One environmentally focused framework for addressing the required life cycle
perspective is to draw from categories specified in the Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and
Reporting Protocol developed by the World Resources Institute and World Business Council for
Sustainable Development (see figure below). The Corporate Value Chain Protocol comprises eight
upstream and seven downstream categories. While the protocol pertains to Scope 3 greenhouse gas
‘emissions, the categories listed actually represent all stages of a product or service life cycle. As such.
they can used to evaluate other environmental impacts beyond carbon emissions.
While the Corporate Value Chain Protocol can be a guide to consider all life cycle stages, the key is for an
organization to determine which aspects within a category are sufficiently relevant to be addressed in the
EMS. Ultimately, the aspects within any relevant category should be subject to the same process used to
evaluate an organization's other aspects, using whatever risk ranking methodology the organization
already has in place, To determine the relevance of any of the categories, an organization can utilize the
following parameters in its analysis:
hitps/lwwwztinityconsullants.cominawslahs-managementiso-14001--2075-implementalion-challenges--addressingife-cyle-perspective 3163128/2018, 150 14001: 2015 implementation Challenges - Addressing Life Cycle Perspective | Teniy Consultants
> Level of environmental impact for aspects within the category
> Ability to control or influence the identified aspects
> Level of stakeholder interest in the environmental impacts
Greenhouse Gas Emission Categories for Different Life Cycle Stages
err
Ce eke oe
1 Purchased goods and services
2 Capital goods
3 Fuel-anc-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or Scope 2)
4 Upstream transportation and distribution
5 Waste generated in operations
6 Business travel
7 Employee commuting
8 Upstream leased assets
9 Downstream transportation and distribution
10 Processing of sold products
11 Use of sold products
12 End-of life treatment of sold products
13 Downstream leased products
14 Franchises
15 Investments
Source: Corporate Value Chain (Seope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard, Table [5.3]
This evaluation can be done qualitatively or via a quantitative scoring methodology. As with many
requirements under ISO 14001, the standard provides considerable flexibility in the aspects evaluation
process, Irrespective of whether a quantitative or qualitative approach is used, the organization should
consider a structured approach.
Example points for consideration for selected life cycle categories are presented in the table above. Note
‘that many organizations have already begun evaluating these categories to some extent as they seek to
develop a carbon footprint or water footprint for sustainability disclosure purposes,
nips: tenktyconsullants.commnewslehs-managementiso-1400'--2016-implementation-challenges-~addressing-fe-cycle-perspective
416arzarzot8 180 +4001: 2015 Implementation Challenges - Addrassing Life Cycle Perspective | Tiny Consultants
Considerations for Determining Relevance of Aspects at Different Life Cycle Stages
on nd
> Charactertze the magnitucle of environmental impact for goods or services — e.g,
do emissions or discharges from raw materials create a relatively lange environmental
impact?
> Determine the level of control or influence that can be exerted to address the
impacts from purchased geods/services — eg, are akemate raw materials or different
suppliers an option?
> Assess whether the impacts from any of these raw materials are deemed critical by
key stakeholders -e, have customers, suppliers, investors, or other interested
Parties expressed concern about this category?
> Characterize the magnitude of environmental impact from various modes of raw
material transport - eg. do emissions or discharges from ship, nilear,ortrucks create
a relatively large environmental impact?
> Determine the level of control or influence that can be exerted to address the
impacts from raw material transportation— e.g, can lowerimpact modes of
‘transportation be preferentially selected?
> Assess whether the impacts from raw material transportation are deemed critical by
key stakeholders ~e-,, have customers, suppliers, investors, or other interested
parties expressed concer about this category?
> Characterize the magnitude of environmental impact from production or use of
fuels/energy - eg, do emissions from fuel ol, natural gas, electricity consumption
create a relatively lange environmental impact?
> Determine the level of control or influence that can be exerted to address the
impacts from fuel/energy production and use — eg.,can energy efficiency, lower
impact fuels or renewable technologies be implemented?
> Assess whether the impacts from fuel/energy production and use are deemed critical
by key stakeholders e.g, have customers, suppliers, investors, or other interested
parties expressed concern about thie category?
Concluding Thoughts
In reviewing the relevant language in the standard to extract the true meaning of life cycle perspective,
several key points become evident. First. there is a need to evaluate environmental impacts beyond the
‘organizational (in most cases, facility) boundary. Second, the new standard requires that the organization
closely examine value chain (e.g., supplier) relationships and how the chain members’ aspects affect the
‘organization's own environmental performance. Third, the organization should consider its ability to
control or influence aspects that are part of a life cycle view.
For further information, contact Mr. Rich Pandullo, Director of EHS Performance & Risk Management, by
email (mailto:rpandulloatrinityconsultants.com) or by phone at (919) 462-9693
‘more chs management news (/news/ehs-management)
CONNECT WITH US.
516arzarzot8 180 +4001: 2015 Implementation Challenges - Addrassing Life Cycle Perspective | Tiny Consultants
V thttp//twittercom/trnityconsutts)
F trip” mwwfacebookcom/7ref-homett!/pages/Trinity-Consultants/160506250635095)
Ye
in (http:/wwwlinkedin.com/company/trinity-consultants) gi (http://www:youtube.com/trinityconsultants)
Subscribe (/subscribe) for the latest news on EHS regulatory developments and EHS performance information.
janegexample.com Subscribe
NAVIGATION
Home Industries (industries)
Services (/services) News (/news)
Training V/training) Media (/media)
Locations (/locations) ‘About Us (/about)
OUR BUSINESSES
Trinity Consultants thttp://\wwwutrinityconsultants.com/) _ BREEZE® Software (http://wwwibreeze-
Trispyrian Resources thttp://wwnwstrispyrian.com/) software.com/) @
Sietra Research (http: //wwwsierraresearch.com/) ‘SafeBridge Consultants (http://unww-safebridge.com/)
13 Vtechnology/t3/about-t3)
Minnow Environmental (http://wwwminnow.ca/)
MSI (http://wwwametsolution.com/) @
Trinity Consultants, Inc. 12700 Park Central Drive, Suite 2100 - Dallas, TX 75251 - 1-800-229-6655 - (972) 661-8100
© 2018 Trinity Consultants, Inc, All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy (/about/privacy-policy) | Having a
problem with the website? (/report-problem)
hitps/lwwwztinityconsullants.cominawslahs-managementiso-14001--2075-implementalion-challenges--addressingife-cyle-perspective ae