50%(2)50% found this document useful (2 votes) 829 views550 pagesWaste Water
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
ENVIRONMENTAL
ENGINEERING-2ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING—2
WASTE WATER
ENGINEERING
(INCLUDING AIR POLLUTION)
By
Dr. B.C. PUNMIA
B.E. (Hons.), M.E. (Hons.), Ph.D.
Formerly, Professor and Head
Department of Civil Engineering &
Dean, Faculty of Engineering
M.B.M. Engineering College,
Jodhpur
*
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Consulting Engineer
Arihant Consultants, Mumbai
IN SI UNITS
LAXMI PUBLICATIONS (P) LTD
BANGALORE eCHENNAl eCOCHIN GUWAHATI eHYDERABAD
JALANDHAR eKOLKATA eLUCKNOW eMUMBAI RANCHI
NEW DELHIPublished by :
LAXMI PUBLICATIONS (P) LTD.
22, Golden House, Daryaganj,
New Delhi-110002.
011-23 26 23 68
Phones: { 011-23 26 23 70
Faxes. } 011-23 25 2572
“| 011-23 26 22 79
Branches :
© 129/1, Illrd Main Road, IX Cross, Chamrajpet, Bangalore (Phone : 080-26 61 15 61)
26, Damodaran Street, T. Nagar, Chennai (Phone : 044-24 34 47 26)
St. Benedict's Road, Cochin (Phone : 0484-239 70 04)
Pan Bazar, Rani Bari, Guwahati (Phones : 0361-254 36 69, 251 38 81)
© 4-2-453, Ist Floor, Ramkote, Hyderabad (Phone : 040-24 75 02 47)
© Adda Tanda Chowk, N.D. 365, Jalandhar City (Phone : 0181-222 12 72)
@ 106/A, Ist Floor, S.N. Banerjee Road, Kolkata (Phones : 033-22 27 37 73, 22 27 52 47)
18, Madan Mohan Malviya Marg, Lucknow (Phone : 0522-220 95 78)
© 128A, Block 3, First Floor, Noorani Building, LJ. Road, Mumbai
(Phone : 022-24 46 39 98)
¢ Radha Govind Street, Tharpagna, Ranchi (Phone : 0651-230 77 64)
EMAIL : colaxmi@[Link]
WEBSITE : [Link]
All Rights Reserved by the Authors. This book, or part thereof, may not be
reproduced in any form or translated in any other language, without the
written permission of the Authors.
First Edition : duly 1996
Second Edition : July 1998
Reprint : Sept. 1999
Reprint : Sept. 2000
Reprint : Aug. 2001
Reprint : Jan. 2003
Reprint : August 2003
Reprint : Feb. 2005
EWW-0618-150-WASTE WATER ENGG
© 1998 : B.C. PUNMIA, ASHOK K. JAIN
ISBN : 81-7008-091-6
Price : Rs. 150.00 Only
C—9893/05/02
DTP Composing by : Arihant Consultants, Jodhpur
Printed at : Sanjeev Offset Printers, Delhi-51CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Historical_Developments
Important Terms and Definitions =
Wastewater Treatment Systems m
Wastewater Management ee
CHAPTER 2. COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE OF SEWAGE
2.1, Systems of Waste and Sewage Disposal
2.2, Conservancy System
23. Water Carriage System
24.
25,
BEBBRE
Comparison and Choice of The Two Systems...
Classification of Water Carriage System ~
CHAPTER 3. WASTEWATER FLOW RATES
3.1. General
32 Dry Weather Flow
3.3. Factors i Weather Flow ~
3.4, Variations in Rate of Sewage -
3.6. Rational Method
3.7. Empirical Formulae
4.2. Hydraulic Formulae on
43. Nomograms/Tables For Hydraulic Computations ...
4.4. Minimum Velocity of Flow oy
45. Maximum Velocity of Flow ~
4.6. Hydraulic Elements of Circular Sewers ~
4.7, Egg Shaped Sewers ~
4.8. Other Sewer Sections ~
49. Storm Water Drains ~
CHAPTER 5. CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS
41 Introduction : of Sewers i
2 i
53,
5.4.
33.
5.6.
32.
:
BREBERe
YAR HE
BSsRess
RRBSSASES58.
5.9.
5.10.
5.11.
5.12.
5.13.
&
Safe Supporting Strength and
Bedding Conditions
Planning of Sewerage System
Layout and Construction of Sewer Lines
Testing of Sewer Lines
Geaning and Maintenance of Sewers
‘aeilal
EDRERESERE
SRERSBEREBE EG
Introduction
Inlets
Catch Basins or Catchpits -
Drop Manhole
CHAPTER 8 WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS
8.1.
FEEEEGRERREESS
Introduction : Constituents of Sewage
Characteristics of Wastewater
Cycles of Decomposition
Physical Characteristics .
Oxygen Demand
Biochemical Demand 1D)
Total Demand (TOD)
‘Theoretical Demand D)
Relative Stability
Population Equivalent
RSRAG
BRRERBSSEEBEB
x8
ai)
CHAPTER 9. NATURAL METHODS OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL
9.1. Introduction ~ 223
9.2. Disposal by Dilution wo 2h
9.3. Types of Receiving Waters For Dilution 225
9.4, Self Purification of Natural Streams ~~ 226
9.5." Oxygen Sag Analysis ~~ 22D
9.6. Dilution into Sea . ‘ 247
9.7. Disposal by Land Treatment 2B
9.8. Comparison of Disposal Methods wo 253
CHAPTER 10. UNIT OPERATIONS FOR WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
10.1. Unit Operations and Processes 256
10.2. Physical Unit Operations 257
10.3. Chemical Unit Processes 258
10.4. Biological Unit Processes 239
10.5. Methods of Treatment of Wastewater 260
10.6. Methods of Sludge Processing and Disposal 268
CHAPTER 11. PRELIMINARY TREATMENT
11.1. Introduction 276
11.2, Racks and Screens 2718
11.3. Comminutors and Barminutors 283
11.4. Grit Chambers 284
11.5. Design of Grit Chambers 285
11.6. Proportional Flow Weir 289
11.7. Parshall Flume With Parabolic. Section
of Grit Chamber 291
11.8. Disposal of Grit 294
11.9. Aerated Grit Chambers 295
11.10. Detritus Tanks 296
11.11. Skimming Tanks 296
11.12. Vacuum Floatation 298
CHAPTER 12. SEDIMENTATION AND CHEMICAL CLARIFICATION
12.1. Introduction 306
12.2. Types of Settlings 307
123. Settling of Discrete Particles 308
12.4. ‘Types of Settling Tanks 3M
12.5. Horizontal Flow Sedimentation Tank ~ 315
12.6. Design of Sedimentation Tanks = 318
12.7. Chemical Clarification - 32
128. _ Type 2 Settling : Flocculent Settling ~ 328(ai)
CHAPTER 13. BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT I: SEWAGE FILTRATION
13.1.
13.2.
133.
13.4.
13.5.
13.6.
13.7.
13.8.
13.9.
13.10.
13.11.
13.12.
13.13.
13.14,
13.15.
13.16.
Introduction
Biological Treatment Techniques
‘Types of Sewage Filters
Intermittent Sand Filters
Contact Beds
Trickling Filters
Construction of Conventional Trickling Filters
Loading, Efficiency and Performance of
Conventional Trickling Filters
Merits and Demerits of Conventional
Trickling Filters
High Rate Filtration
Recirculation and Trickling-Filter Flow Sheets
Process Design and Efficiency of
Trickling Filters
Proprictory Types of High Rate Filters
Secondary Clarifiers (Humus Tanks)
Trickling Filter Troubles and Remedies
Other Types of Filters
CHAPTER 14. BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT II :
14.1.
142.
14.3.
14.4.
14.5.
14.6.
14.7.
148.
14.9.
14.10.
14.11.
14:12.
14.13.
14.14,
14.15.
ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS
Introduction
Activated Sludge Process mechanism
Aeration Units
Diffused Air System
Mechanical Aeration Systems
Combined Mechanical and Diffused Air System ...
Aeration Tank Loading Criteria
Sludge Production and Process Control
Oxygen Requirements and Control
Activated-Sludge-Treatment. Systems
Secondary Settling
Operational Difficulties
Advantages and Disadvantages
High-Purity-Oxygen Activated Sludge
CHAPTER 15. BIOLOGICAL TREA' 2
15.1.
15.2.
MISCELLANEOUS METHODS
Oxidation Ditch
Stabilization Ponds (Oxidation Ponds)
331
332
333
333
335
337
340
345
387
387
391
391
396
401
414
415
423
431
441
442
447
45715.3.
15.4.
15.5.
15.6.
15.7.
CHAPTER 16. TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF SLUDGE
16.1.
16.2.
163.
16.4.
16.5.
16.6.
16.7.
168.
16.9.
(aii)
‘Acrobie Ponds (Algae Ponds)
Anaerobic Ponds
Facultative Ponds (Oxidation Ponds)
Aerated Lagoons
Rotating Biological Contactors
Introduction
Sludge Treatment Processes
Amount and Characteristics of Sludge
Sludge Thickening or Concentration
Anaerobic Digestion
Aerobic Digestion
Sludge Conditioning
Sludge Dewatering
Final Disposal of Sludge
CHAPTER 17. SEPTIC AND IMHOFF TANKS
17.1.
17.2.
173.
174,
175.
17.6.
17.7.
178.
179.
Septic Tanks
Design and Construction Features
Effluent Disposal in Septic Tanks
Advantages and Disadvantages of Septic Tanks
Leaching Cesspools
Imhoff Tanks
Imhoff Tank Design Considerations
Advantages and Disadvantages of Imhoff Tanks ...
The Clarigester
CHAPTER 18. ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT
18.1.
18.2.
18.3.
18.4.
18.5.
18.6.
18.7.
18.8.
18.9.
18.10.
18.11.
18.12,
Introduction
Suspended Solids Removal
Diatomaccous-carth Filters
Ultrafiltration
Granular Media Filtration
Adsorption by Activated Carbon
Phsophorus Removal
Nitrogen Removal
Biological Nitrification-denitrification
Ammonia Stripping:
Physico Chemical Wastewater Treatment
Disinfection of Sewage : Chemical Oxidation
CHAPTER 19. INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
19.1.
Introduction
459
461
463
472
473
416
477
478
487
41
503
S058
506
508
513
Sit
S17
§21
$23
S24
525
526
Sa
$33
S34
535
536
S38
S41
544
545
550
551
552av)
19.2. Characteristics of Industrial Wastewater
19.3. Methods of Treatment
19.4. Dairy Industry
19.5. Cane Sugar Industry Wastewater
19.6. Distillery and Brewery Wastewater si
19.7. Petrochemical Industries Waste 562
19.8. Textiles Industries Waste a 564
19.9. Paper and Pulp Mills Waste = 566
CHAPTER 20. HOUSE DRAINAGE
20.1. General Principles = 569
20.2. Principles of House Drainage = 569
20.3. Pipes and Traps = 570
20.4. Classification of Traps ~ S71
20.5. Floor Trap or Nahni Trap < S72
20.6. Gully Trap ~ $572
20.7. Intercepting Traps . ~ 573
20.8. Grease Traps we «S74
20.9. Sanitary Fittings we STA
20.10. Systems of Plumbing ee 580
20.11. House Drainage Plans 582
CHAPTER 21. RURAL SANITATION
21.1. Introduction = 584
21.2. Rural Sanitation = 584
21.3. Collection and Disposal of Dry Refuse = 585
21.4. Collection and Disposal of Sullage - 586
21.5. Disposal of Excretal Waste 586
21.6. Night Soil Disposal without
‘Water Carriage : Previes “ 586
CHAPTER 22. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
22.1. ‘Introduction 591
Quantity and Composition of Refuse . 592
22.3. Collection and Removal of Refuse 592
224. Transport of Refuse = = 593
225. Disposal of Refiise . $93
22.6. _ Composting ~ 597
CHAPTER 23. AIR POLLUTION
23.1. Introduction : Definitions ~ 601
23.2. The Biosphere and Environment = 602,
23.3. Causes of Air Pollution = 603
23.4. Composition of Atmospheric Air a 604:@v)
23.6. Characteristics of Important Air Pollutants
23.7. Effects of Air Pollution
23.8. Meteorological Aspects of
Air Pollution Dispersion
23.9. Plume Rise and Effective Height of Stack
23.10. Dispersion Equations.
23.11. Design of Stack Height
23.12. Air Pollution Control Methods and Equipment
23.13. Equipment for Control of Particulate Pollutants ...
23.14. Control of Gaseous Pollutants
APPENDIX
INDEXIntroduction
1.1. SANITARY ENGINEERING
Sanitary Engineering is the branch of Public Health En-
gineering which deals with the preservation and maintenance of
health of the individual and the community, by preventing com-
municable deseases. It consists of scientific and methodical collection,
conveyance, treatment and disposal of the waste matter, so that public
health can be protected from the offensive and injurious substances.
Sanitation is the prevention of the sporadic outbreak of diseases,
and can be achieved by either controlling or eliminating such en-
vironmental factors that contribute in some form or the other to
the transmission of diseases,
If the waste matter, created and given out by the human and
animal life, and also by industries etc. is allowed to accumulate,
it will get decomposed and will contaminate or pollute air, water
and food. Hence sanitary disposal of the waste, either in the solid
form or in the liquid form, is most essential. The sanitary sewage
includes excreta (i.c. waste matter eliminated from the body), domestic
sewage (ic. uscd water from home or community which includes
toilet, bath, laundry, lavatory and kitchen-sink wastes) and industrial
wastes. The improper disposal of human excreta and sewage is the
major factor threatening the health and comfort of individuals where
satisfactory sewerage systems are not available.
1.2, HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS
The need for proper drainage of wastewater seems to have
been felt even during the ancient times. Among the first historical
traces of sanitary engineering construction, dating back to about 3750
@2 ‘WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
B.C., is the sewer arch at Nippur in India. A sewer running under
an important street in Tell Asmar, near Bagdad, was probably con-
structed during the twenty sixth century B.C. Excavations in the environs
of Bagdad reveal sewers constructed of bricks, with laterals connected
to water flushed latrines, date from 2500 B.C. Curt Merckel, an
antiquarian of Engineering, was able to find an old Babylonian seal
cylinder. Layard’s explorations revealed arched severs in Nineveh and
Babylon dating from seventh century B.C. Schick and Warren have
unearthed considerable informations about the sewers of Jerusalem.
The works of this class in Grecian cities are fairly well known, and
the great underground drains of Rome have repeatedly been described.
The Cloaca Maxima, an ancient arched channel which drained the
Roman Forum is still is use in Rome. It is believed that these
early channels were installed as ground and surface drains and not
for the water carriage of human faecal matter. Following Roman
practice, early sewers elsewhere were constructed originally for the
removal of storm water. All human excreta were excluded from the
sewers of London until 1815, from those of Boston until 1833 and
from those of Paris until 1880.
There was no marked progress of sewerage from first century
AD. to the beginning of nineteenth century. However, wastewater
farming was practiced in Germany in 1550 and in England in 1700.
In England, chemical precipitation of wastewater was tried in 1762.
The subject of wastewater treatment and disposal received only o¢-
casional local attention in England until the construction of sewerage
systems after the cholera epidemics of the mid-1800 s. The early
sanitary conditions in London, Paris and United States were the
worst possible. John Phillips was the first engineer to make a com-
prehensive study of metropolitan sewerage needs in an official capacity
in 1847. In the years 1848, 1849, 1852, 1853 and 1854, there was
an out break in cholera epidemic in England, resulting in a total
mortality of 25000 lives. The developments in the sewerage works
was ‘the result of the awakening of the people by a succession of
cholera epidemics. The actual works started in 1859 under the su-
pervision of J.W. Bazalgette. The sewerage system of Paris, like that
of London, was inaugurated as a result of cholera epidemic. In United
States, J. W. Adams first applied the engineering knowledge to
design the sewer system for Brooklyn. E.S. Chesbrough designed
the sewer system for Chicago in 1858. In 1880, Waring system of
separate sewers was installed in Memphis. Early Studies in sewage
treatment were made in the United States through the establishment
of the Lawrence Experimental Station in 1887 by the Massachusetts
State Board of Health. The influence of the research done there
has been profound and far reaching. The intensive methods of treatmentINTRODUCTION 3
developed at Lawrence are still in use today. In the early stages,
both England and United States suffered from the improper design
of separate systems of sewerage in which the house sewerage and
rain water were led separately. It is not definitely known as to who
designed the first system ofsewers for removing house sewage separately,
but the principle was strongly advocated by Chadwick, the father
of sanitation in England. Excreta was legally admitted to sewers
of London, Boston and Paris in 1815, 1833 and 1880 respectively.
It was in 1847 that connections of houses and cesspools to the sewers
were made compulsory by the law in London.
The discharge of wastewater to environments (i.c. land and
streams) caused adverse condition, and this led to the development
of intensive methods of sewage treatment. Sedimentation and chemical
precipitation (1762) were one of the first processes used for wastewater
treatment. In 1865, early experiments on microbiology of sludge
digestion were conducted in England. In 1868, early experiments
on intermittent filtration of wastewater were conducted, while in
1870 early experinents on intermittent sand filtration were made
in England. In 1876, first septic tank was developed in the United
States. In 1882, first experiments on aeration took place in England.
United States was the first to use bar racks in 1884: In United
States first chemical precipitation treatment plant was installed in
1887. In 1889, filtration in contact beds was tried at the Lawrence
Experiment station, Massachusetts. In 1891, the method of sludge
digestion in lagoons was developed-in Germany. In 1895, methane
gas was collected from the septic tanks and used for plant lighting
in England. The first rotary sprinklers for rotary filters were developed
in 1898. The first grit chambers were developed in the United States
in 1904.
The offensive character of the sludge produced by sedimentation
led to the use of septic tanks in which the solids were rendered
more or less inoffensive, but difficulties of various kinds led to the
general adaptation of Travis two-story septic (hydrolytic) tank in
England in 1904, and the Imhoff tank which was patented in Germany
in 1904. The chlorination of wasterwater for disinfection was
demonstrated by Phelps in the United States, in 1906. The first
municipal installation of a trickling filler was made in United States
1908, and at the same time laws of disinfection were formulated
by Chick in United States. In United States, the first Imhoff tanks
were constructed in 1911. Simultaneously, in 1911, separate sludge
digestion was adopted in United states, to distinguish it from the
two-storey tank process. In 1912-13, aeration of wasterwater in tanks
containing slate was carried out at Lawrence Experiment station.
In 1914, experiments were conducted by Ardern and Lockett that4 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
led to the development of the activated sludge process, wherein a
high degree of purification is achieved. The process was first applied
in a municipal plant for treating sewage at San Marces, Tex., in
1916. In 1925, contact aerators were developed by Buswell in United
States.
The changing characteristics of wasterwater, due to discharge
df many contaminants, are responsible for the many changes that
are taking place today in the wastewater treatment. More than half
a million types of organic compounds have been synthesized since
the turn of the century and many of these compounds find their
way in the wastewater from many cities. Most of these can be
treated effectively, but the number of those compounds which are
not amenable to treatment is also increasing. The number of industries
that discharge wastes to domestic sewers has increased significantly
in the past 3 to 4 decades. In the future, it is anticipated that
rather than combining industrial and domestic waste, separate treat-
ment facilities will be provided for the industrial wastes before they
Can be discharged to the domestic sewers.
1.3. IMPORTANT TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
1. Refuse : Refuse is a general term used to indicate what
is rejected or left out as worthless. It may be in liquid, semi-solid
or solid form, and many be divided into six categories : (i) garbage
(ii) rubbish (ii) sullage (iv) sewage (v) subsoil water and (vi)
storm water.
2. Garbage : Garbage indicates dry refuse. It includes waste
paper, decayed fruits and vegetables, grass and leaves, and sweepings
from streets, markets and other public places. Thus, garbage contains
large amounts of organic and putritying matter.
3. Rubbish : Rubbish indicates sundry solid wastes from
offiees, residences and other buildings. It also includes waste building
materials, brocken furniture, paper, rags etc. Generally, rubbish is
dry and is of combustible nature.
4, Sullage : Sullage is a term used to indicate the wastewater
from bath rooms, kitchens, washing places and wash basins etc. It
does not create bad smell since organic matter in it is either absent
or is of negligible amount.
5. Sewage : Sewage indicates the liquid waste from the com-
munity. It includes sullage, discharge from laterines, urinals, stables
industrial waste and also the ground surface and storm water that
may be admitted into the sewer. It is extremely putrescible ; its decom-
position produces large quantities of malodorous gases, and it may
contain numcrous pathogenic or disease producing bacteria.INTRODUCTION s
6. Sub-Soil water : [t is the ground water that finds it
entry into sewers through leaks.
7. Storm water: It indicates the rain water of the locality.
8. Sanitary sewage : Sanitary sewage or domestic sewage
indicates sewage mainly derived from the residential building and
industrial establishments. It is extremely foul in nature. Sanitary
sewage may be classified as (i) domestic sewage and (i) industrial
sewage.
9. Domestic sewage : It is the sewage obtained from the
lavatory basins, urinals and water closets of residential buildings
office buildings, theatres and other institutions. Since it contains
human excreta and urine, it is extremely foul in nature.
10. Industrial sewage : it is wastewater Obtained from the
industrial and commercial establishments. It may contain objectionable
organiccompounds that may not be amenable to conventional treatment
processes.
11. Night soil: It is a term used to indicate the human
and animal excreta.
12. Sewer: It is an under-ground conduit or drain through
which sewage is carried to a point of discharge or disposal. Separate
sewers are those which carry the house hold and industrial wastes
only. Storm water drains are those which carry rain water from the
roofs and street surfaces. Combined sewers are those which carry
both sewage and storm water. House sewer (or drain) is a pipe carrying
away the sewage from a building to a street sewer. Main sewer or
trunk sewer is a sewer thal receives sewage from many tributary
branches and sewers, serving as an outlet for a large territory. Branch
sewer or submain sewer is a sewer which receives sewage from @
relatively small area, usually a few laterals, and discharge into a
main sewer. Lateral sewer is a sewer which Collects sewage directly
from the houses. It indicates the first stage Of sewage collection.
Depressed sewer is a section of sewer constructed lower than adjacent
sections to pass beneath an obstacle or Obstruction. It runs full under
the force of gravity and at greater than atmospheric pressure, the
sewage entering and leaving at atmospheric pressure. /ntercepting
sewer is a sewer laid transversely to general sewer system to intercept
the dry-weather flow of sewage and such additional surface and
storm water an may be desirable. An intercepting sewer is usually
a large sewer, flowing parallel to a natural drainage channel, into
which a number of main or out fall sewers discharge. Out fall sewer
is a sewer that receives the sewage from the collecting system and
conducts it to a point of final discharge or to a disposal plant.
v6 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
Relief sewer or overflow sewer is a sewer built to carry the flow
in excess of the capacity of an existing sewer.
13. Sewerage : The term sewerage, as a noun, means the
structures, device, equipment and appurtenances intended for the
collection, transportation and pumping of sewage and liquid wastes,
but excluding works for the treatment of sewage. The term sewerage
also includes the entire science of collecting and carrying sewage
by water carriage system through sewers.
14, Wastewater : The term wastewater is now increasingly
used is place of sewage. Wastewater includes both organic and mineral
matter carried through liquid media. While the organic portion of
the wastewater is putrescible, undergoing biological decomposition,
the mineral matter may combine with water to form dissolved solids,
may form unsightly sludge deposits and may contribute to the hardness
of the water in the effluent.
1.4, WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS
The wastewater treatment or sewage treatment is a broad term
that applies to any process, operation or combination of processes
and operations, that can reduce the objectionable properties of water-
carried waste and render it less dangerous and repulsive to man.
Thus, the waterwater should be treated before its ultimate disposal
in order to :
(a) reduce the spread of communicable diseases caused by
the pathogenic organisms in the sewage and
(6) prevent the pollution of surface and ground water.
Wastewater treatment is a combination of physical, chemical
and biological processes.
Methods of treatment in which the application of physical
forces predominate are known as unit operations, while the methods
of treatment in which chemical or biological activity are involved
are known as unit processes. There are three types of unit operations
and processes.
1. Physical unit operations
2. Chemical unit processes
and 3. Biological unit processes.
Physical unit operations are those in which application of physical
forces predominate. They consist of screening, mixing, flocculation,
sedimentation, flotation etc. Chemical unit processes are those in
which removal of contaminants are brought about by chemical activity.
Common examples of chemical unit processes are : chemical precipita-
tion, gas transfer, adsorption, ion exchange, electrodialysis etc. Biologi-
cal unit processes are these in which the removal of contaminants
are brought about by biological activity. Common examples of suchINTRODUCTION 7
Processes are : activated sludge process, tricking filtration, sludge
digestion etc,
Conventional treatment is the term used to describe the standard
method of sewage treatment in temperate climates. It comprises
of the following stages of treatment :
1. Preliminary processes/treatment
2. Primary treatment
and 3. Secondary (or biological) treatment.
The preliminary processes consist of removing floating materials
as well as heavy settleable inorganic solids; these also include pumping
and flow measurement. The primary treatment is aimed at the sedimen-
tation of organic suspended solids. In secondary treatment, biological
Processes are used to remove most of the organic matter.
Sometimes, the wastewater is also subjected to tertiary treatment
(also known as advanced treatment) with the aim of removing the
pollutants not removed in primary and secondary treatment. These
pollutants may include soluble inorganic compounds (such as phos-
phorus and nitrogen) remaining organic material, pathogens, colloidal
solids, soluble minerals and other toxic substances.
In addition to the various stages of treatment of wastewater
mentioned above, the processing and disposal of sludge obtained
from the above treatment methods is of equal importance. Disposal
of ‘the accumulated waste sludge is a major economic factor since
the cost of its processing is about one third of that involved in
the treatment plants. The basic features and characteristics of these
unit operation/processes and treatment methods have been described
in Chapter 10.
15. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT
There are three constituents and interrelated aspects of waste-
water management :
1. Collection
2. Treatment
3. Disposal/Re-use.
Collection of domestic and industrial wastewater is best achicved
by a fully developed sewerage or water carriage system. The planning
and design of wastewater collection facilities involves the determination
of wastewater flow rates; the hydraulic design of sewers, large conduits,
and junction and diversion structures ; the selection of sewer ap-
purtenances and pumping stations. Most sewers are laid under roads
to avoid interference with private property when connections and
repairs have to be made. Sewers are commonly laid in straight lines,
man holes being provided at all changes of direction, gradient and8 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
“diameter. With the modern developments in other fields, many
recent changes have been made in wastewater collection — notable
amongst them being the photogrammetric and computer techniques
to the design of sewers, the improvement of construction materials,
and the application of computers in the control of storm sewers.
The topics on the wasterwater collection have been discussed in
chapters 2 through 7.
Treatment of wastewater is essential in order to reduce the
spread of communicable diseases caused by the pathogenic organisms
in the sewage and to prevent the pollution of surface and ground
water. The treatment of wastewater is carried out by a combination
of physical unit operations and chemical and biological unit processes,
before the end products can be safely disposed off. The form of
treatment normally adopted consists of providing an environment
in which natural processes of decay can be intensified and controlled
so as to take place in the least objectionable manner. The various
methods of wastewater treatment have been discussed in chapter
9 through 20.
After the treatment, the problems of disposal arises. The most
important recent trend in the field of disposal is the establishment
of increasingly stringent requirements to protect the environment.
Currently used effluent disposal methods are (i) dilution in streams
and rivers (i) land application and (fii) re-use in aquaculture and
«sop irrigation. The most striking example of agricultural re-use of
domestic wastes is in China in which over 90% of national night
soil production is, after treatment, applied to the land and it represents
about one third of the nutrients actually used by the crops. The
sludge and concentrated pollutants are disposed of in lagoons, sludge
drying beds or sanitary land fills, for small treatment plants, and
by vacuum filtration followed by heat drying and incineration in
large treatment plants.
Performance criteria for wastewater management system
Anideal wastewater managementsystem, consisting of collection,
treatment and disposal/reuse, should satisfy the following criteria.
1. Health criteria The system should be so designed that
pathogenic organisms do not spread either by direct contact with
the night soil or sewage or indirectly via. soil, water or food. The
treatment method chosen should be such that high degree of pathogen
destruction is achieved and other harmful chemical pollutants are
removed or neutralized to the largest extent possible.
2. Reuse criteria. The treatment processes used should be
such that the treatment effluent is safe to be reused for aquaculture,
. agriculture, industrial cooling and ground water recharge.INTRODUCTION 9
3. Ecological criteria. If the treated effluent is not re-used,
but is disposed of in the receiving waster, its characteristics should
be such that the aquatic environment is protected and the self purifica-
tion capacity of the recipient water is not exceeded. For this, a
high degree of removal of organic matter (BOD) is required in order
to prevent pollution of the receiving watercourse by oxygen depletion.
4. Nuisance criteria. The treatment system should be so
designed that either it does not release objectional odour or the
degree of odour released must be below the nuisance thresh hold.
No part of the system should be aesthetically offensive.
5. Cultural criteria. The methods chosen for collection, treat-
ment, disposal and reuse should be such that they match with local
habits, social customs and religious practices of the people of the
area.
6. Operational criteria. The system should be such that it
may operate with minimum difficulties, and greater degree of spill
is not required. It should be such that operation is possible with
locally available staff, with minimum possible training.
7. Cost criteria. The system should have minimum possible
capital and running costs, which can be easily paid by the community.
The return of the reuse of the end products is an important factor.
If the end products are not reused, their disposal should be achieved
with minimum possible cost.Collection and Conveyance
of Sewage
2.1. SYSTEMS OF WASTE AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL
Wastes or refuse are of two types : solid waste and liquid
waste. Night soil consists of human or animal excreta and ureas,
originating at privies, water-closets, urinals and stables. Garbage in-
dicates dry refuse from a town, and includes swecpings from houses,
streets, markets and such other public places, waste paper, leaves,
grass, parings from vegetables, decaying fruit ctc. constitute garbage.
Sullage indicates waste waster from bath rooms, kitchens, washing
places and wash basins etc. Sewage indicates the liquid waste from
the community. It includes sullage, discharge from latrines, urinals,
stables, and the industrial waste. It is extremely putrescible; its
decomposition produces large quantitics of malodorous gases, and
it may contain numerous pathogenic or disease producing bacteria.
The refuse, consisting of all above item, formed in any sanitary system
should be rapidly and safely ‘carried to its disposal site so as to
maintain a clean environment. Excreta and sewage is satisfactorily
disposed of if the following conditions are satisfied.
1, The waste does not pollute the ground surface, nor is it
exposed to atmosphere when in adequately treated.
2. It should also not be accessible. to children or household
pets.
3. It does not pollute or contaminat¢ drinking water supply.
4. It does not give rise to odour nuisance.
(10)COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE OF SEWAGE ll
5. It does not give unsightly appearance.
6. It does not give rise to mosquito nuisance. It should also
not be accessible to insects and rodents.
7. It does not pollute or contaminate the waters of bathing
beach or streams used for domestic water supply.
Depending upon the type of waste, two systems may be employed
for its collection, conveyance and disposal :
(@) Conservancy system
(6) Water carriage system.
2.2. CONSERVANCY SYSTEM
This is an old system in which various types of wastes, such
as night soil, garbage etc. are collected separatety in vessels or deposited
in pools or pits and then removed periodically atleast once in 24
hours. On account of this method of handling independently the
different types of refuse from a place, the term conservancy system
has been derived. The system is also known as the dry system. The
following are the methods of collection of various types of wastes
in the system.
1. Night soil. Night soils or human excreta in latrines, privies
or cesspools etc. is collected separately in pans or pails and carried
on heads of sweepers to a central place from where it is transported
in bullock carts or motor vans to a place away from the town for
its final disposal. Normally, it is buried into ground, in trenches,
to give excellent manure in one or two years.
2. Garbage. Garbage is collected separately, in dust bins and
conveyed on hand carts or motor van once or twice is a day. It
may consist of waste matter of both non-combustible as well as
combustible type. The two are therefore sorted out. Garbage disposal
methods include the open dump, hog feeding, incineration, dumping
into sanitary fill, fermentatian or biological digestion. Incineration,
if properly controlled, is satisfactory for burning combustible refuse.
3. Sullage and storm water. Sullage and storm water are
collected and conveyed separately in closed or open gutters. The
liquid and semi-liquid mass of filth which frequently overflow the
receptacles in privies is swept away by the sweepers to drain from
the privies, which carry it to drains carrying sullage and storm water,
along the public lanes or streets.
There was a time when the conservancy system was favoured
and the water carriage system was opposed by European chemists,
physicians and agriculturists because of a fear of contamination of
the soil by leakage from the sewers and the possible pollution of
bodies of water receiving the sewage, and possible nuisance where12 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
sewage was distributed on land. However, in India, the conservancy
system is still on vogue in all the villages and small towns. Only
a few cities have the water carriage system.
Disadvantages of conservancy system
The conservancy system has the following disadvantages :
1. Hygiene and sanitary aspect : The consevancy system is
highly unhygienic and cause insanitary conditions since the excreta
starts decomposing within few hours of its production. Even if it
is assumed that cleaning will take place twice in a day, the excreta
remaining in the previes will emit bad smell and will give rise to
fly nuisance.
2. Transportation aspect : Transportation of night soil takes
place in open carts through streets and other crowded localities.
This is highly undesirable.
3. Labour aspect : The working of the system depends entirely
on the mercy of labour (sweepers). If they go on strike even for
one day for any reason whatsoever, the previes can not be used
because of foul smell. The whole locality will smell very badly.
4. Building design aspect : The lavatories or previes are to
be located outside the house and slightly away from the main building.
The compact design is therefore not possible.
5. Conditions of drains : Insanitation may be there due to
carriage of sullage through open drains laid in the streets.
6. Human aspect : In the present day world, when man has
progressed much, it is highly humiliating to ask human beings to
transport night soil in pails on their heads.
7. Risk of epidemic : Due to improper or careless disposal
of night soil, there are more chances of. outbreak of epidemic.
8. Pollution problems : The liquid wastes from lavatories
etc., during their washing, may soak in the ground, thus contaminating
the soil. If the ground water is at a shallow depth, it may also
be polluted due to percolation of waste water.
9. Cost consideration : Though the system is quite cheap in
the beginning, its maintenance and establishment costs (i.¢. recurring
expenditure) are very high.
10. Disposal land requirement : The system requires considerable
land for the disposal of sewage.
2.3. WATER CARRIAGE SYSTEM
In this system, the collection, conveyance and disposal of various
type of wastes are carried out with the help of water. Thus, water
is used as medium to convey the waste from its point of production
to the point of its treatment or final disposal. Sufficient quantityCOLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE OF SEWAGE 13
of water is required to be mixed with the wastes so that dilution
ratio is so great that the mixture may flow just like water.
In this system, specially designed latrines, called water closets
(W.C.) are used which are flushed with 5 to 10 litres of water after
its use by every person. The human excreta is thus flushed away
and led to suitable designed and maintained sewers. The wastes from
kitchens, baths, wash basins etc. are also led to the sewers. The
sewers are the underground closed pipes which are laid on suitable
longitudinal gradient so that flow takes under gravity and proper
flow velocity is maintained to keep the sewer clean. The sewers
lead the sewarage so collected, to a suitable site where it is treated
suitably and then is disposed off by irrigation or by dilution. It
should be noted than the garbage is collected separately and conveyed
in the same manner as is done in the case of conservancy system.
If garbage is permitted in the sewers, they may be clogged.
The system requires large initial cost of installation and it
requires large quantity of water also to create efficient flow conditions.
If the financial conditions of people are poor, it may be difficult
to adopt this system. However, this is the most efficient and hygienic
system of sewage disposal, and may be adopted in stages if sufficient
funds are not available in the beginning.
Advantages of water carriage system The water carriage system
is the most modern system of drainage, and has the following advantages:
1. Hygienes and sanitary aspect : The system is very hygienic
since the night soil and other waste water is conveyed through closed
conduits which are not directly exposed to the atmosphere. There
is no bad smell because of continuous flow.
2. Epidemic aspect : There are no chances of outbreak o1
edpidemic because flies and other insects do not have direct access
to the sewage.
3. Pollution aspect : The liquid wastes etc, are directly conveyed
through the sewers, and therefore there are no changes of the waste
water being soaked in the ground thus contaminating the soil. The
waste water does not percolate down to join the ground water. There
are no chances of pollution of water of wells in individual houses
if any.
4. Compactness in design : Since the latrines are flushed after
every use, excreta does not remain and there are no foul smells.
The latrines can therefore be attached to the living and bed rooms.
This permits a compact design. The lavatories can be accommodated
in any part of the house.
5. Labour aspect: The labour required for the operation and
maintenance is extremely small. In fact, the functioning of the system14 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
is practically automatic, except for the operation of certain pumps
etc. Therefore, there is no labour problem. In the individual houses,
the latrines/lavatories can be coveniently cleaned by occupants them-
selves.
6. Treatment aspect : The system permits the use of modern
methods of treatment of the sewerage collected through the sewers.
The treated waste water and sewage can be safely disposed off without
any risk.
7. Land disposal requirements : Because of treatment facilities,
the land required for the disposal of the treated wastewater is very
much smaller than-that required for the conservancy system.
8. Cost consideration : Though the initial cost of installation
of the system are very high, the running costs are very small
since manual labour is very much reduced.
2.4. COMPARISON AND CHOICE OF THE TWO SYSTEMS
The water carrigage system is the most modern and hygienic
system of sweage disposal, and should be invariabley adopted wherever
sufficient funds are available. Table 2.1 gives comparison between
the two systems.
2.5. CLASSIFICATION OF WATER CARRIAGE SYSTEM
The water carriage system can be divided into the following
(1) Separate system
(2) Combined system
(3) Partially separate system
The above three types are commonly referred to as the three
systems of sewerage.
1. Separate system
The separate system provides two separate systems of sewers—
the one intended for the conveyance of foul sewage only, such as
faecal matter, domestic wastewaters, the washings, and drainings of
places such as slaughter houses, laundries, stables, and the waste
waters derieved from the manufacturing processes ; and the other
for the rain water, including the surface washing from certain streets,
overflow from public baths and foundations etc. The sewage from
the first system of sewers can be led to the treatment works, while
the flow from the second system of sewers can be discharged directly
to natural streams etc. without any treatment. .
Advantages
The separate system has the following advantages :
1. The cost of installation is iow. The storm water can beCOLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE OF SEWAGE 15
TABLE 2.1 COMPARISON BETWEEN CONSERVANCY AND
WATER CARRIAGE SYSTEM
| ___Comaorvay Sates |
‘The system is unhygienic since every] The system is hygienic. Sewers are laid
thing is visible. below the ground and hence excreta!
ete. is not visible.
Due to putrefication, there is a lot of] No chances of putrefication, and
foul smell.
Large labour force is required
Water consumption is small Requires high water consumption
Initial cost is small, though the running| High initial cost. Running costs small
costs are high
No technical persons required Technical persons required for oper-
ation and maintenance
Acute pollution problems Pollution problems are rare.
Risk of spread of epidemic Nosuch risk
Large land required for the disposal of] Small land required for the disposal of
untreated sewage. treated sludge
Final disposal into streams etc not free} Final disposal easier because of treat-
from risks ment works.
Good quality manure available from} The sludge has small manure value.
the end products
The system is more suitable for rural] The system is better suited for urban
conditions conditions.
disposed off through the open channels along the road sides. Old
sewers may also be suitably converted to carry rain water. Thus,
the actual sewers carrying foul sewage will be of smaller size.
2. The load on the treatment units will be lowered, since
only the foul sewage carried by the separate sewers need be treated.
3. If there is necessity of lifting the sewage mechanically, the
system will prove to be economical both from the point of view
of capital costs, as well as from the point of view of running costs.
4, The sewages in the separate system will be of more unifrom
character, and so will lend itself more easily to putrification.
5. There is no necessity of providing automatic flushing tanks,
for use in dry weather, because the flow in a sewer of smaller section
is much more efficient.
6. Sewers of smaller section can be easily ventilated than those
of larger section.16 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
7. The night flow will be comparatively small this may facilirate
operations at the outfall works.
8. Rain water can be discharged into streams or rivers without
any treatment.
Disadvantages
1. Since the sewers are of small size, it is difficult to clean
them.
2. They are likely to get chocked.
3. Two sets of sewers may. ultimately prove to be costly.
4. There is a likelyhood of connections being wrongly made
through a confusion of the systems.
5. Storm water sewers or drains comes in use only during
the rainy season. During other part of the year, these may serve
as dumping place for garbage, and may get chocked.
6. Because of lesser air contact in small size sewers, foul smell
may be there due to the sewage gas formed.
2. Combined system
The combined system provides only one sewer to carry both
the foul sewage as well as the rain water. The sewage and rain
water are carried to the sewage treatment plant, before its final
disposal. The combined system is advocated on the ground that the
street surface washings are as impure as the sewage itself, and should
therefore be suitably treated before being allowed to enter the natural
stream.
Advantages
1. The system requires only one set of sewers. Hence the
maintenance costs are reduced.
2. The sewers are of larger size, and therefore the chances
of their choking are rare. Also, it is easy to clean them.
3. The strength of the sewage is reduced by dilution.
4. There is more air in the larger sewers than in smaller
ones of the separate system. Hence the sewer gas that may be formed
gets diluted. Thus the chances of foul smell are reduced.
Disadvantages
1. The cost of ‘construction are very high because of large
dimensions of the sewers to be constructed at sufficient depth to
receive the sewage from the basement.
2. Beasue of large size of sewers, their handling and transpor-
tation is difficult.
3. Due to the inclusion of the storm water, the load on the
treatment plant increases.COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE OF SEWAGE 17
4. The system is uneconomical in the circumstances when pump-
ing is required for lifting of sewage.
5. During heavy rains, the sewers may overflow, and may thus
create unhygienic conditions and cause pollution problems.
6. Storm water is unnecessarily polluted.
7. The large sewers get easily silted if not properly designed.
They may become foul in dry weather, when rain water, is not available.
8. Large sewers are more difficult to be ventilated than the
smaller ones.
3. Partially combined system
In this system, only one set of underground sewers is laid.
These sewers admit the foul sewage as well as the early washings
by rains. As soon as the quantity of storm water exceeds a certain
limit, the storm water overflows, and is thus collected and conveyed
in open drains to the natural streams. The foul sewage, however,
continues to flow in the sewers.
Advantages
1. The sewers are of reasonable size. Their cleaning is there-
fore not very difficult.
2. It combines the advantage of both the separate as well
as the combined systems.
3. The storm water permitted in the sewers eliminates its
chances of chocking. The sewers are completely cleaned
during rainy season.
4. The problem of disposing off storm water from homes
is simplified.
Disadvantages
1. During the dry weather, when there is no rain water,
the velocity of flow will be low. Thus self cleansing velocity
may not be achieved.
2. The storm water increases the load on treatment units.
3. The storm water also increases the cost of pumping.
Factors governing choice of separate system The scparate system
is adopted under the following conditions:
1. Financial aspect : If sufficient funds are not available in
the beginning, sewers may be constructed to carry only domestic
sewage, and the rain water may be conveyed thro’ the open drains.
These drains can be converted into regular sewers later when sufficient
funds are available.
2. Flat topography : If the country is flat, the sewers will have
to be laid at a depth in order to achieve reasonable gradient. In18 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
such circumstances, separate sewers are more economical. A combined
sewer of a bigger size, laid at a great depth will be costlier.
3. Rainfall patiern : If the rainfall is there for a shorter duration,
and does not take place throughout the year, it is more economical
to adopt separate system.
4. Outlet conditions : If a river or natural stream is available
nearby, separate system is best suited. The storm water can be directly
conveyed to the stream, while the foul sewage can be led to the
treatment plant.
5. Pumping aspects : Separate system is best suited under the
conditions when the sewage has to be lifted up by pumping. The
Separate sewers for; the storm water will reduce the load on the
pumps.
6. Steep topography : If the ground has steep slopes, it is
easier to convert storm water through open drains, to the natural
stream.
7. Subsoil conditions : If the subsoil is hard, it is difficult
and costlier to lay combined sewer of larger size.
8. Development pattern : If the sewers are laid before the area
is developed, it is preferable to adopt separate system.
Factors governing choice of combined system
A combined system is adopted under the following conditions:
1._ Space considerations : Combjued system is preferred when-
space available for laying the sewers is restricted.
2. Integrated development : If the sewers are laid along with
the overall development of the area, a combined system is preferred.
3. Even rainfall pattern : Combined system is preferred if the
rainfall is evenly distributed through the year, and also when the
rainfall during -the monsoon season is not that - intensive,
4. Conversion of existing storm water drains : The combined
system is preferred if an existing storm water drain is being converted
into a combined sewer. This is possible only if the quantity of sewage
is small.
5. Pumping requirements : If the ground slopes are such that
it is necessary to lift both the sewage as well as the storm water,
it is preferzble to use the combined system.
Choice of the system The factors governing the choice of
any system are so vast and varied that no generalisation can be
done regarding the final choice. The conditions vary from place to
place. If the availability of funds is the main factor, then one may
conclude that separate system may be adopted if sufficient funds
are not available in the beginning. In that case, sewers may be designedCOLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE OF SEWAGE 19
to carry the foul sewage and rain water may flow through the open
drains along the roads and streets. This suggestion may be more
appropriate for small cities. For large metropolitan cities, however,
a combined system is highly desirable. It is possible to design combined
sewers such that reasonable velocities are maintained in them through
the year. Alternatively, a partially separate system may be adopted
for these big metropolitan cities.
1.
PROBLEMS
Describe (i) conservancy system, and (ii) water carriage system. What
are the relative advantages and disadvantages of the two systems ?
‘What are the conditions that are to be satisfied for the satisfactory
disposal of sewerage.
Describe in brief the methods of collection of various types of wastes.
in the conservancy system.
Describe in brief various types of water carriage system, stating ad-
vantages and disadvantages of each.
Discuss the relative merits of the separate and combined system of
sewage, and give the conditions favourable for the adoption of each
one of them.Wastewater Flow Rates
3.1. GENERAL
In order to determine the section of the sewer, it is essential
to know the total quantity of wastewater or sewage that would flow
through the sewer. The total wastewater flow can be divided two
components :
(a) Dry weather flow (D.W.F.)
and (b) Storm water flow
The dry weather flow is the-flow through the sewers that would
normally be available during non-rainfall periods. It consists mainly
of (i) Domestic sewage and (ii) Industrial wastewater.
The storm water flow is the additional flow that would occur
during the rainy season. It consists of runoff available from roofs,
strects, yards, open spaces etc. during rainfall.
3.2. DRY WEATHER FLOW
It is that quantity of wastewater that flows through a sewer
in dry weather when no storm water is in the sewer. The dry weather
flow is also sometimes called as ‘sanitary sewage’, and is obtained
from the following sources :
(i) Domestic wastewater : A certain quantity of water is being
supplied daily by the Water Works Department, for domestic use.
This water gets consumed in various ways, and therefore all of it
‘does not reach the sewer. The wastewater reaching the sewers will
be that part of water which is used for flushing water closets (W.C.),
urinals, washing clothes, bathing, washing utensils etc.
(ii) Industrial wastewater : This is the wastewater generated
by the industry after consuming water for its manufacturing processes.
(20)WASTEWATER FLOW RATES 2i
(iii) Waste water from public facilities : This is the wastewater
from schools, cinemas, hotels, railway stations street washings.
(iv) Ground water infiltration : This is quantity of ground
water that infiltrates into the sewers. It depends upon the nature
of soil, material of sewers, nature and condition of sewer joints,
depth of sewer and position of water table.
3.3. FACTORS AFFECTING DRY WEATHER FLOW
The dry weather flow or the quantity of sanitary sewage depends
upon the following faetors :
(a) Rate of water supply.
(6) Population growth.
(c) Type of area served
(d) Infiltration of ground water
(@) Rate of water supply The quantity of wastewater produced
from a community would naturally depend upon the rate of water
supply per capita’ per day. The quantity of wastewater cntering the
sewers would be less than the total quantity of water supplicd. This
is because of the fact that water is lost in domestic consumption
(ie. cooking etc.), evaporation, lawn sprinkling, fire fighting, industrial
consumption etc. However, private source of water supply (i.e. water
from domestic wells etc.) and infiltration of sub-soil watcr in the
sewers increase the wastewater flow rate. This extra water that enters
the sewers can be assumed to approximately equal to the water
lost in consumption etc. On this reasoning, one can assume the
wastewater flow rates equal to the rates of water supply by the municipal
authorities. If however, one is sure that no extra water enters the
sewers, the wastewater quantity may be assumed to be 80% of the
quantity of water supply. The sewers should be designed for a minimum
of 150 litres per capita per day.
(6) Population growth The sewerage system is designed for
the quantity of wastewater not only of the present population but
also of the population a few year hence. The population forecast
may be done by the following methods :
Arithmetical increase method
Geometrical increase method
Incremental increase method
Decreased rate of growth method
Graphical extension method.
Graphical comparison, method.
Zoning method or master plan method.
Ratio and correlation method.
Growth composition analysis method.
PRON ANAYN22 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
These methods have been discussed at length in Vol. I (Water
Supply Engineering) of the book. Out of the various methods mentioned
above, the most suitable approach is to base the estimation either
on anticipated ultimate density of population or on floor space index
(FSI).
In case the desired information on population is not available
in the Master Plan of the town, the densities given in Table 3.1
may be adopted as suggested by the Manual on Sewage and Sewage
Treatment prepared by the Public Health and Environmental En-
gineering Organisation.
TABLE 3.1 POPULATION DENSITIES
==
ae 20,000 - 50,000 250-300
4. [ so0-350 |
5.
50,000 to_100,000
Above 100,000
In cities where floor space index (FSI) or floor area ratio (FAR)
limits are fixed by the municipal authorities, population density may
be easily worked out as illustrated below. Let us assume that a
particular development plan rules provide for the following reservations
for different land uses :
Roads . 2%
Gardens 15%
Schools 6%
Markets : 3%
Hospitals and dispensaries : 2%
4%
~. Area available for residential development= 100 — 46 = 54%
Let us consider an area of 1 hectare (= 10‘ m’)
Actual total floor area residential development
= (0.54x 10‘) x FSI.
Let us assume FSI of 0S.
<. Area available for residences = 0.54 x 10‘ x 0.5= 2700 m?
Assuming a floor area requirement of 9m? per person,
2700 300'
Density of population/hectare 7
Design period: The branches and main sewers are designed
for the population which may occur at the end of one generationWASTEWATER FLOW RATES 23
of 30 years. This period of 30 years is called the design period.
However, the pumping plants etc. are designed for a design period
af 5 to 10 years only, since additional pumps can be installed whenever
needed. The treatment units are designed for 10 to 30 year period.
The rate of use of water and the consequent rate of sewage
production increases with increase in population. This is due to the
fact that the increase in the population of the town is mainly due
to improved facilities. Data in U.S.A. reveal that the percentage
increase in per capita water use is equal to 5% of the percentage
increase in population. Though no such figures are available for
Indian conditions, Table 3.2 shows how water consumption and sewage
production increases with the increase in population.
TABLE 3.2. EFFECT OF GROWTH OF POPULATI
“ee
[Link] lit Jeapitalday
130-160 10~120
Pato ste | 1600
Pst ts | tao z00 | soso
More than_10_lacs 200250
(©) Type of area served. The quantity of wastewater produced
depends upon whether the area to be served is residential, commercial,
or industrial. The wastewater from the residential area directly depends
upon the rate of water supply. If there is no infiltration of water
in the sewers, and if there are no private sources of supply, the
wastewater produced from the residential area may be assumed to
be equal to 70 to 80% of the water supplied through the public
supply system. The amount of waste water produced from the industrial
locality depends upon the types of industries and their corresponding
industrial processes, The same is the case with the commercial un-
dertakings. The sewage flow rates can be determined after careful
study of the various process involved.
@)_ Infiltration of sub-soil water. Ground water or subsoil
water may infiltrate into the sewers through the leaky joints. Exfiltration
is the reverse process which indicats the flow of wastewater from
the sewer into the ground. While due to the infiltration the quantity
of flow through sewer increases, exfiltration results in decrease in
the flow and consequent increase in the pollution of ground water.
Both infiltration as well as exfiltration are undesirable and take place
due to imperfect joints. However, infiltration is much more import-
ant from the point of sewer design. Also, infiltration unnecessarily
increases the load on the treatment works.24 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
Infiltration of water into the sewer depends upon the following
factors :
(i) Depth of sewer below ground water level .
(ii) Size of sewer
(ii) Length of sewer through infiltration prone zone
(iv) Nature and type of soil through which sewer is: laid
(v) Type of joints, workmanship etc.
(vi) Sewer material.
Infitration of water into the sewer line may be expressed by
the following methods.
(i) Area basis : In this, the rate of infiltration is expressed
as litres per hectare of area per day, ie. 5000 litres per hectare
per day. Thus, if-the area sered by the sewer line is equal to 10
hectares, the total infiltration volume per day will be 5000 x 10 = 50000
litres. The infiltration may range from 0.2 to 28 m’/hectare/day.
In absence of any other data, the infiltration flow rates shown in
Fig. 3.1 may be adopted.
ie
Eo
a
n
AVERAGE INFILTRATION
so =O 500 1000 5000
SERVICE AREA (ha)
FIG. 3.1. AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE. CURVE
(ii) Length basis : In this, the rate of infiltration is expressed
as litres per unit length per day, ie. 10,000 litres per km length
of sewer per day. If the length of sewer through the ground water
zone is 5 km, the total infiltration volume will be 10000 x 5
= 50000 litres/day, at the above rate. However the rate of infiltration
may vary between wide limits to 10,000 to 50,000 litres per km/day.
(iii) Diameter-length basis : This is the most rational method
in which infiltration rate is expressed in litres per cm diameter of
3WASTEWATER FLOW RATES 23
sewer per km length per day. The rate of infiltration will increase
with the increase in the diameter of the sewer.
3.4, VARIATIONS IN RATE OF SEWAGE
The rate of sewage flow is not constant. It varies with every
hour of the day, every day of the season and with every season
of the year. The designer is concerned with both maximum and
minimum rate of flow. The sewers should be so designed that it
can take the maximum load. At the same time, they should be laid
on such longitudinal gradient that there are no deposits in the sewers
at the minimum flow. Both the maximum and minimum flows are
expressed as percentage of the average rate of flow. The variations
in the flow may be due to several factors, such as habits of the
people, working hours of the office, climatic conditions, timings of
water supply, type of industries etc.
In the residential areas, the sewage flow rises by about 6 AM
and reaches the maximum between 8 and 10 AM. Then it falls gradually
till minimum flow is reached between 1 to 4 P.M. The rate of flow
then rises again. The relation between the maximum and the average
rate of flow of sewage for residential areas can be expressed by
the following empirical relations :
( Babbit’s formula :
Qnner = a (BL) ,
(i) Harmon’s formula”
Qmax = (t+ ra 73 8) (3.2)
where Qma = maximum rate of flow
Qa = average rate of flow
P = population in thousands
The first formula is restricted to maximum value of P=1000
and a min. value of P=1. There is no such limitation in the second
formula. For preliminary computations, the ratio of average to min-
imum flow may be taken to be the same as the ratio of maximum
to average rate of flow. For commercial and industrial undertakings
the variables are so many that no definite formulations can be made
for the relation between maximum, average and minimum flows.
The hourly, daily and seasonal variations of the sewage flow
(D.W.F.) of a town affects the working of not only the sewers,
but also of the pumping station and treatment plants. The hourly
rate of wastewater flow is affected by the hourly variations in water
consumptions. In general, the wastewater-discharge curve closely paral-
lels the water consumption curve, but with a time lag of few hours.6 ‘WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
Fig. 3.2 shows the hourly variation of domestic sewage. Fig.
3.3. shows the relation between hourly variation of water consumption
and sewage flow.
Temperature and climatic conditions are the principal factors
affecting the seasonal rate of sewage flow. For Indian conditions,
average rate of sewage flow may be assumed to occur in Oct./Nov.
and March/ April. Minimum rate of flow may be obtained during
HRP
| | | T/T TN ||
Leanmeenghroe | | [NV | |
PAT RE
o 24 6 8 © 2 2 4 6 8 0 12
PM MN
—> HOURS OF THE DAY
FIG. 3.2. HOURLY VARIATIONS OF SEWAGE FLOW
° 2 4 6 6 © 2 2 4 6 eo 12
AM N PM
—> HOURS OF THE DAY
FIG. 3.3. SEWAGE now VARIATIONS WITH RESPECT TO
WATER SUPPLYWASTEWATER FLOW RATES 27
the Dec,Jan. while max. rate may be obtained during June/July. Fig.
3.4 shows daily variations in sewage flow during minimum-flow—day,
average-flow-day and maximum-flow-day.
FIG. 3.4. VARIATION IN DAILY FLOW
If the annual average rate of flow is taken as 100, then the
Maximum seasonal flow may be about 120, the maximum monthly
flow may be about 140, the maximum day flow may be about 150
to 180, and maximum hourly flow may be 200 to 300.
Peaking factors
The effect of daily variations in sewage flow is maximum on
domestic and lateral sewers because they receive the flow directly
from the source. This effect diminishes gradually as the flow reaches
the branches and the mains. Various sewers in a sewer-network are
designed not for the average annual flow rate, but for a flow rate
which is higher than the average flow rate by a peaking factor ie.
ratio of peak flow to average flow). Such peaking factors are given
in Table 3.3.
If flow records are insufficient to establish peaking factors,
the curves given in Fig. 3.5 may be used. These curves have been
developed from analysis of records of numerous communities through-
out United States.2B WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
TABLE 3.3. PEAKING FACTORS OF SEWER DESIGN
Factor to multiply average rate of annular flow
gs5
E
z
Z2
z
a
a
a4
2 5 10 20 50100 200
POPULATION (THOUSANDS)
(e)
5
g 5
“4
s 3
z
=
2
a
a1 1
g 5 oo: 2 9 9
: C ° ° = o
6 ° °
AVERAGE WASTEWATER FLOW (m%s)
(b)
FIG. 3.5. PEAKING FACTORS FOR DOMESTIC SEWAGE.
10 50100 560 1000
SERVICE AREA, ha
FIG. 3.6. PEAK INFILTRATION FLOWWASTEWATER FLOW RATES 2
For determining peak infiltration flows, curves shown in Fig.
3.6 may be used. Curve A is for old sewers while curve B is for
new sewers. In addition to newly designed sewers, new sewers include
vitrified-clay pipe with premolded gasket joints, asbestos cement pipe
with coupling and rubber gasket joints, and reinforced concrete pipes
with ring or compression rubber gasket joints. Peaking factors of
infiltration are derived from flow measurements ; common values
range from 1.5 to 2.0.
The peak factor (i.e. the ratio of maximum to average flows)
also depends upon the contributing populations, as indicated in Fig.
3.5. (a). The Manual recommends the following values :
Contributory population Peak factor
1. Up to 20,000 35
2. 20,000 to 50,000 2.5
3. 50,000 to 750,000 2.25
4. above 750,000 2.0
Minimum flows. The flow in the sewers is minimum during
night hours when people are at sleep. The use of flushes and bath
rooms during these hours in minimum. The effect of this minimum
flow is maximum on lateral sewers since these sewers get the house
drainage directly. The effect of minimum flow on mains and trunk
sewers is not much since the fluctuations get damped. In laterals,
the minimum flow may be between 20 to 30% of the average flow,
while in the mains and trunk sewers, the minimum flow may vary
between 40 to 60% of the average flow. The overall variation between
the maximum and minimum flow is maximum in lateral sewers,
RATIO OF AVERAGED SUSTAINED
PEAK AND LOW FLOWS TO AVERAGE FLOW
5 (2) 1S 0 25
NUMBER OF CONSECUTIVE DAYS DURING PERIOD
OF RECORD THAT FLOW RATES WERE SUSTAINED
FIG. 3.7. SUSTAINED FLOWSw» WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
and minimum in mains and trunk sewers. The ratio of maximum
to minimum flow may vary between 6 to 8 for laterals, while it
may vary between 2 to 4 for the mains ard trunk sewers.
Sustained flows. Apart from information about expected peak
flows, information about extended sustained flows is equally important.
Sustained flows are flows that persist for various time durations (say,
2 hours or larger). Sustained flows that are higher than the average
flow, or those, lower than the average flow are of importance in
sewer design. Fig. 3.7 shows typical sustained averaged peak flows
and sustained average low flows derived from available records for
a long durations of 1 to 8 hours :
3.5. STORM WATER FLOW
When rainfall takes place, a part of it infiltrates or percolates
into the ground surface while the remaining flows over the land
depending upon permeability of the ground, its surface slope and
many other factors. The amount of water flowing over the ground
surface, pavements, house roofs etc. is commonly known as ‘runoff’
or the storm water. This storm water is ultimately drained through
the sewers, otherwise the streets, roads etc. would be flooded. The
amount of peak storm water flow may be several times more than
D.W.F. In the case of combined system, the sewers are normally
not designed for the peak storm water flow, otherwise the size of
the sewers would be alarmingly large. During ordinary or normal
rain, the sewers run full of storm water. However, during heavy
rains, the peak storm water is allowed tu accumulate for sometime,
while the sewers continue to run full of storm water. After the
rains are over, the accumulated storm water is discharged gradually
through the sewers. The storm water flow is also known as wet
weather flow and is abbreviated as W.W.F.
The runoff or the storm water flow depends upon the following
factors : (i) Catchment area (ii) Ground slope (iii) Permeability of
ground (iv) Extent of impervious area such as buildings, paved yards,
non-absorbent road surface etc. (v) Extent of vegetation growth (vi)
Rain fall intensity (vii) Rainfall duration (viii) Condition of ground
prior to the rainfall (ix) Concentration or compactness of catchment
area. (r) Climatic conditions such as wind, humidity, temperature etc.
For the purposes of estimating storm water flow for sewer
design, the following two methods are commonly followed
(a) Rational method (6) Empirical formulae.
3.6. RATIONAL METHOD
The rational formula is most commonly used for design of
storm drains. In takes into account the following three factors:WASTEWATER FLOW RATES 31
(é) Catchment area A (ii) Impermeability factor (/) of the
catchment area. (iii) Intensity of rainfall (R)
The rational formula, can be expressed as follows in its gener-
alised form :
Q=K.A.I.R; (33)
where Q-=run off or storm water flow
K =constant which permits the expression of the
factors A, J and R in convenient units.
Let Q =runoff in cubic metres per second (cumec)
A =catchment area in hectares
A; = impervious area = A XI
R; = Intensity of rainfall in mm per hour.
In order to find corresponding value of factor K, we have
2 = (0A) (0 (sa05 5005)
or Q =a an (3.4)
1
In other words, K = 300
The rational formula (Eq. 3.4) is also sometimes expressed
in the following form :
Q=54 CRA (3.4 a)
where C .is called the coefficient “of runoff.
If, however Q is expressed litres per second, A in hectare,
and R; in cm per hour, we have
Q = (10-4) ( sy Sse} * 1000
or Q= OAR, = 28AIR; (3.5)
(1) Catchment area. The three factors operative in Eqs.
3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 are : catchment area, impermeability factor (I) and
the intenisity of rainfall (Ri). The catchement area served by a given
storm water sewer can be found directly form the map of the town
Showing the positions of streets, houses, play grounds, sewers etc.
However, since the factor J depends upon the type of the surface,
the catchment areas of different types of surfaces, as indicated in
Table 3.4, should be found separately.
(2) Impermeability factor. The storm water flow depends
upon the imperviousness of the surface over which rainfall takes
place. If the ground is relatively impervious, more runoff takes place.
The percentage of rain water that is available in the form of runoff
is known as impermeability factor or runoff coefficient. Table 3.432 ‘WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
gives Kuichling’s impermeability factors, while Table 3.5 gives Fruhling’s
impermeability factors for various types of surfaces. For design purposes
the factor J must be estimated not as it is at present but what
it will be after development at the end of 30 years design period.
TABLE 3.4. KUICHLING’S IMPERMEABILITY FACTORS
Type of surface Fede!
Water tight roof surface 0.7 to 0.95
Asphaltic pavement in good order 0.85
Stone, brick and wood block pavements with tightly cemented] 0.75
joints
Same as above, with open or uncemented joints 0.50
Inferior block pavements with open joints 0.40
Macadamized road ways 0.25 to 0.60
Gravel road ways and walks 030
Unpaved surfaces, rail road yards, and vacant lots 030
Parks, gardens, lawns, and meadows, depending on surface| 0.05 to 0.25
slope and characteristics of subsoil
Wooded area or forest land, depending upon surface slope and] 0.01 0.20
charcteristics of subsoil
0.70 to 0.90
Areas closely built up 075
Areas with 50% attached houses and 50% detached houses | 0.65
‘Suburban area with detached houses 045 to 0.55
Extremely suburban areas with 20 to 60% parking and widely] 0.35
detached houses
Average Impermeability Factor. As stated earlier, a given catch-
ment area may consist of various types of surfaces for which different
impermeability factors are applicable. The average impermeability
factor for the whole area can be computed as follows :
Let Aj,A2.....An = areas of the different surface of the
catchment area.
Jy, h...... Jn = Cotresponding impermeability factors for
the different surfaces. Then,
Impermeable area = Afi + A212 + ..0Mdatn =ZA.TWASTEWATER FLOW RATES 33
Al, + Azle wn Antn — ZAI
Hence Tov AtA +t. =A
(3) Intensity of rainfall. The value of factor R; ie. intensity
of rainfall in mm/hour (or cm/hour) can be worked out from the .
rainfall records of the area. However R also depends upon frequency
and the duration of the storm.
( Storm frequency : The frequency of storm for which the
sewers are to be designed depends upon the importance of the drainage
area. Commercial and highly priced areas should be subject to less
frequent flooding than the residential area while the other unimportant
areas can be subject to more frequent flooding. Manual suggests
the following values of frequency :
(a) Residential Areas:
(i) Peripheral areas : Twice a year
(i) Central and comparatively area priced high : One a year
(b) Commercial and high priced areas : One in .two years.
(ii) Duration of storm ; The duration of storm is taken equal
to the time of concentration. It is the time required for the run-
off to be contributed to the point of concentration from the entire
area.
(3.6)
Fig. 3.8 shows typical rainfall intensity curves for various fre-
quencies of storm. The value of the rainfall intensity (Rj) can be
determined for any given time of concentration (i), using these curves.
Where rainfall records are not available, the following empirical formula
may be used for computing R; in mm/hour. In all the formulae,
R; is inversely proportional to #, i.c. shorter the duration of rainfall,
greater will be the intensity during that period.
5 YEAR CURVE
MAX. CURVE
RAINFALL INTENSITY, mm/nour
DURATION IN MINUTES
FIG. 3.8. RAINFALL INTENSITY CURVES.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.WASTEWATER FLOW RATES 35
to the flow. Finally, when the whole area is contributing, maximum
rate of runoff will be obtained, which will be equal to rate of precipitation
over the whole of the impevious area. The time required from the
beginning of rainfall to the one corresponding to the achievement
of maximum rate of runoff is called the time of concentration. This
maximum rate of runoff will continue till the rainfall stops. After
that, the runoff will gradually decrease.
The time of concentration consists of two components : (a)
time of entry, % and (6) time of flow, %
The time of entry or the inlet time is the time taken by the
rainfall to run from the most distant point of the watershed to
the inlet of the sewer. The areas tributary to most of the sewers
are usually small. Hence it is customary to assume suitable value
of time of entry (f.) based on experience under similar conditions.
The time of entry decreases with increase in slope and imperviousness
‘of the ground, while it increases with distance and storage conditions
of the ground. A normal practice is to assume it between 3 to
20 minutes, the lower value being adopted for the steepest slope
while higher value is adopted for grassy plots.
The time of flow is the time required for the flow of water
in the sewer to the point under consideration. It is computed by
assuming the velocity of flow in the drain and measuring the length
of drain or sewer from inlet point to the point under consideration,
ie. t= distance/velocity. The time so computed is usually less than
the actual time for the flood crest to reach the point of concentration
from the sewer inlet because of the time required to fill the sewer.
The time required to fill the sewer is known as the time of storage.
This time may be appreciable, but is usually neglected.
Thus the total time of concentration (t- = te + ff) can be com-
puted. It is to be noted that larger the catchment, the longer will
be the time of concentration. It is generally considered that the maximum
runoff occurs when the duration of storm is equal to the time of con-
centration. This is so because if the duration of storm is shorter
than the time of concentration, the whole of the catchment will
not be contributing water, though the intensity of rainfall will be
more than that obtainable for a storm of longer duration. The result
will be that lesser runoff will be obtained. If, on the other hand,
the duration of storm is longer than the time of concentration, the
rainfall intensity will be less, resulting in lesser runoff.
Based on the above discussions, Lloyed Davis arrived at the
following conclusions :
@ The tstal volume of storm water is proportional to the
maximum rate of flow. (ii) The total discharge of the storm wateraa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.”
WASTEWATER FLOW RATES.
snomrg («)
snowsodunt 0b (111)
snowradut 9409 (1)
snowwiodmy (3)
2uin pators u Suypoaruaouoo
(opm x & = YuIT)
Burrs %
(a)
snoiaroday (1)
au paws
uy Supomaouod 101205
T
(43NUOH YALAV) 9 SINAIOMAIOO JAONNU AOVAAAY GALHOIGA
‘of TIGvL
(sarmuruty
< 1 uonwmqaa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.WASTEWATER FLOW RATES 43
A = catchment area in hectares = 20 hectares.
o= 20x 0589 50. 1.08 m*/sec = 1080 litres/sec.
Example 3.4. The drainage area of one sector of a town is
20 hectares. The classification of the surface of this area is as follows.
Hard pavement
Roof surface
Unpaved street
Gardens and lawns
Wooded area
If the time of concentration for the area is 30 minutes, find
the maximum runoff. Use the following formula ‘for intensity of rainfall:
t+ 60
Solution
C1 A, = 0.85 x 0.25A = 0.21254
C2Az = 0.80 x 0.25.4 = 0.20004
C33 = 0.30 x 0.15.4 = 0.04504
C4 Ag = 0.15 x 0,25.A = 0.0375.A
Cs As = 0.10 x 0.10A = 0.01004
sum 0.5050A
=CA _ 0.50504 _
Cav = 0.505
Now R= 90 where R; is in mm/hour
t+ 60
= —_ <0 mm/nr.
30 + 60
Hence from Eq. 3.4 (a)
1
=~ CRA.
360 4
= sig % 0.505 x 10 x 20 = 0.2806 cumecs
Example 3.5. An impervious area of 20 hectares is to be served
by a sewer line. This area is subject to three storms P;, P2 and P; with
equal frequency of occurrence. The duration of the three storms is
20 minutes, 30 minutes and 35 minutes respectively. Taking the timeaa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.4)
Hydraulic Design of Sewers
4.1, INTRODUCTION
The sewage, to be transported through ’sewers, is mostly liquid
(ie. water), containing hardly 0.1 to 0.2 percent of solid matter in
the form of organic matter, sediments and minerals. Hence the general
approach for the design of sewers is similar to the design of water
mains. However, there are two differences in the designs of the
sewers and of the water mains :
(i) Presence of solid matter : Water flowing through the water
mains is practically free from solid matter, while the sewage flowing
thro’ sewers contain particles of solid matter (both organic as well
as inorganic). These solid particles settle at the bottom, and have
to be dragged during the sewage transport. In order that the sewers
are not clogged, they are to be laid at such a gradient that self
cleansing velocity is achieved, at all value of discharges. Also the
inner surface of the sewers must be resistant to the abrasive action
of these solid particles.
(ii) Pressure : Water in the water mains flow under pressure.
Hence the water mains can be carried, within certain limits, up and
down the hill or gradient. The hydraulic gradient line lies very much
above the pipe surface. On the other hand in most cases, sewers
may be considered as oped channels, wherein the sewage runs under
gravity. The sewers seldom run full, and the H.G. line falls within
the sewer. Hence the sewers must be laid at continous downward
gradient. Sewers run under pressure only when they are designed
as force mains and as inverted siphons.
(47)aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS S51
on point A corresponding to Q=4m'/min on the quantity scale
and on point B corresponding to S = 0.002 on the slope scale. The
Straight line AB cuts the diameter scale at 350 mm and the velocity
scale at 0.68 m/s. Thus, for the given data of Q= 4m’/min and
s = 0.002, the diameter of the pipe will be 350 mm and the resulting
velocity of flow will be 0.68 m/s when flowing full.
Lo-0s
o4
‘0 se-fors
a oo 33-4840
30-1760
7
27 4685
6 10-0 = os
20 Sa qeo z
2 i
ee aso &
age G 5 20-08
= waco 2
60 3 Z
3p 50 oS O7
15-4300 4,
& a
= & $= ——
es 124303 — s
4s =
1o42ss z= 30
20 e200 a
=
'
os
40
oe iso
ing 4 2
Os. Lo “a
oso? softs
eo
oO or
os 60
o3stos
20
on tO
o2
os
aoe,
oz
FIG. 4.1. NOMOGRAM FOR MANNINGS FORMULA (N = 0.013)
(CIRCULAR PIPE RUNNING FULL)aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 55
help of the nomograph. For any other value of C, take the value
from the chart and multiply it by C/100.
3. Santo-Crimp’s Tables. These table are based on Crimps
and Bruge’s formula (Eq. 4.5 and 4.6) and are commonly used in
India. A sample page of Santo-Crimp’s tables is shown in Table
4.4. These table are available for all shapes of sewers.
TABLE 4.4. SANTO-CRIMP’S TABLES (CIRCULAR SEWER RUNNING FULL)
Grade 1 in 225 Grade 1 in 100
V (mlsec) Q (Litres/sec) V(mlsec) Ollit./sec.)
0.4787 3.76 0.560 4.40
0.628 11.12 0.942 16.67
0.760 23.90 - 1.140 35.83
0.8826 43.34 1.324 65.01
0.996 7052 1.494 105.80
1.156 127.70 1.735 191.70
1,306 208.00 1.960 312.30
1447 313.30 2.170 470.10
1,582 448.1 2373 672.0
1711 611.2 2.566 918.5
1837 812.5 2.754 1219.0
2.073 1320.0 3.200 2038.0
4.4, MINIMUM VELOCITY OF FLOW
The sewage flowing through a sewer contains organic as well
as inorganic solid matter which remains suspended as the sewage
flow. In order to keep the solid matter in suspended form, a certain
minimum velocity of flow is required, otherwise the solid particles
will settle in the sewer, resulting in its clogging. Such a minimum
velocity is known as self-cleansing velocity.
A self cleansing velocity may be defined as that velocity at
which the solid particles will remain in suspension, without settling
at the bottom of the sewer. Also it is that velocity at which even
the scour of the deposited particles of a given size will taken place.
It is not possible to maintain thin self-cleansing velocity throughout
the day because of fluctuations in sewage flow. During minimum
flow of sewage, the velocity of flow is less than the self cleansing
velocity. Hence self cleansing velocity should be maintained atleast
once in a day.
Shield’s expression for self-cleaning velocity. The self-cleansing
property of sewage depends upon the scouring action of the flowing
sewage. According to Shield, the velocity required to transport water-aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 59
TABLE 4.7 NON-SCOURING VELOCITIES.
Material of sewer Non scouring velocity (cm/sec)
Earth channels 6010 120
Ordinary brick-lined sewers 150-250
Cement Concrete sewers 250—300
Stone ware sewers. 300—450
Cast Iron sewer pipes 350—450
Vitrified tile and_glazed_bricks 450—500
Effect of variations of discharge on velocity in sewers. As
stated earlier, the discharge in a sewer does not remain constant
at all times. It varies from time to time. Due ‘to the variation in
discharge, the hydraulic mean depth (R) also varies. Since the velocity
of flow is a function of R™, the velocity of flow also varies as
the sewage discharge varies. This is more prominent in the case
of a combined sewer or in a partially combined sewer.
As the flow decreases in the sewer, the velocity of flow also
decreases. When the sewer becomes less than half full, (assumed
at one third the average flow), it is essential to check that the velocity
of flow is atleast equal to 40 cm/sec. At the same time, the designer
should ensure that a velocity of about 90 cm/sec is developed outleast
at the time of maximum flow. While designing the sewers, the
following points should be observed in connection with the self-
cleansing velocity and non-scouring velocity.
1. Before the sewer design is done, the discharge is known.
Hence the velocity of flow and gradient of the sewers are to be
appropriately determined and correlated, to achieve the desired results.
2. For sewers in flat country, the design of sewers should
be done in such a way that self-cleansing velocity is obtained at
maximum discharge. However, the section of sewer should be such
that even at minimum discharge, the velocity is at least equal to
40 cm/sec. °
3. For sewers in roughs country, the design of sewers should
be done in such a way that self-cleansing velocity is obtained at
minimum discharge while non-scouring velocity is obtained at maximum
discharge. If due to steep slopes, the velocity is exceeded during
maximum discharge, drop man holes should be provided to bring
down the velocity within the non-scouring value.
4. In the case of combined sewer, it may be difficult to achieve
self-clearing velocity during minimum flow (D.W.F.). In that case,
special form of sewers (such as the one shown in Fig. 4.10) should
be adopted.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 63
ror S
| .
os ‘
‘
08
= 7
onl = /
" y
8 Az66 |e >|
% 06 ye Lop PLAS 4
Qa ‘iS ie
9 x (6 &
—& os+-—+—
= MK oO
= o4 S <;
ht s ?
8 o3| £ SIC
4 WL
oz rx
ee
oO! Sit
Zl
ol
© Ol O2 O3 04 O5 O6 O7 O08 O9 10 HH 12 13
RATIOS OF HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS.
Q/A,t7R, W/V, q/Q, AND N/n
FIG. 4.8. VARIATION OF RATIOS OF HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS
Partial depth self cleansing flow. Sewers flowing between 0.5
and 0.8 full need not be placed on steeper grades to be as self-cleansing
as sewers running full. This is so because the velocity (v) and the
discharge (q) are functions of the tractive force intensity (t) which
depends upon friction coefficient as well as the velocity. Using
subscript s denoting self cleansing equaling that obtained in full
section, the needed ratios vs/v, q;/Q and s,/S can be computed
with the help of Eq. 4.8 (a) on the assumption that equality of
tractive force intensity implies equality of cleanings, or
t=
or Yu. .S =YwRS (where s = 53)
Hence = (2 Js (4.18)
or & =8 (4.18 a)
Therefore, ue a (zy (&)" = x (Z)" 4.19
snd $- (E&I) 1420
The variation of % and 4 with d/D ratio are shown in Fig.
4.9, both for N/n = 1.0 as well as for V/n variable. The curve for
variation of s;/S with d/D is also shown. From curve for ss/S in
Fig. 4.9, it is confirmed that minimum grades (corresponding to thataa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 67
= V BG.- ea
V £a@- ve
Here f = 0.06 ; f = 0.02 ; G, = 2.66 and d, = 1 mm = 0.001 m.
8 x 0.06
0.02
= 0.625 m/sec.
Here D=60cm=06 m.
When sewer runs half full, d/D =0.5
Hence d=0.55D=0.3m and 6 = 180°
Vs= (2.66 — 1) x 9.81 X.0.001
=12 pr_ 2D
anagD ae
180 __2D
pan Daeg = "DX 36 = >
ey ee
re) 3? XD i 4 0.125 m
Now vatargve
where v =V, = 0.625 m/sec.
Taking n =N=0.012, we have
2/3 V2
0.625 = at (0.125)! s'
From which s-ar
Hence the required gradient =1 in 1111.
Example 4.6. A main combined sewer is to be designed to serve
an area of 12 sq. km with a population density of 250 persons/hectare.
The average rate of sewage flow is 250 litresicapitalday. The maximum
flow is 100% in excess of average together with the rainfall equivalent
of 15 mm in 24 hours, all of which are runoff. Determine the capacity
of the sewer. Taking the maximum velocity of flow as 3 m/sec., determine
the size of the circular sewer.
Solution. Total population= (12 x 10°) ha x 250 persons/ha
= 300000 persons
Average flow = 300000 x 250 = 75 x 10° litres/day
=p. 10 x —|_ = 0,868 cumecs.
24x @) x 60 ~ 1000
Max. sewage flow =2x average flow =2 x 0.868
= 1.736 cumens
1
12x ox( song laa 60x 60
= 2.083 cumecs
Storm water flow = cumecsaa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS . n
For a sewer running partially full (Fig. 4.7)
6 d tees
cos 5 = 1-25 =1-2x07= 0.4
= 113.58°; 6 = 227.16° ; sin 6 = — 0.7332
From Eq. 4.12 @ |
NID
"i _ sin) _ 2 pf 227.16 , 0.7332
a=5D i a 1 | S60 * 3
= aay Dp wai)
227.16 ‘A
pane =1D=[a- = 1.9823D (ii)
872 D* i
~Pogaa = 0-2962D iii)
Now, anyers”
aol. 72 D? (0.2962 Dy? ( 1)"
0.5556 = a 0.5872 D? (0.2962 Dy (xa)
or D™ = 0.6190
From which D = 0.835 m
Check for self cleansing velocity at max. discharge
Fat ten 0 = 0.2962 x 0.835 = 0.2474 m
5 se ¥ dgv2_ | 2/3 ve
vetprs aay (0.2474) (sta)
356 m/sec.
This is much more than the self cleansing velocity of 60 cm/sec
(Table 4.6).
Check for self clearing velocity at min. discharge. Let us assume
minimum flow equal to x times the average flow.
+ Qmin. = (1/3) X 0.1852
Also, max. flow Q = 3 x 0.1852
fn = hm
° 0.11
From Fig 4.8, for $ = 0.11, we get 4 = 0.22, assuming n = N.
Alternatively, we may get these values from Table 4.8 by interpolation.
dq,
0.22
D
Corresponding to this depth ratio, “a = 0,647
Vmin, = 0.647 X 1.356 = 0.88:m/sec.
This is more than the required valuc of 40 cases.
Note : For analytical solution for this part of the problem, see! example 4.12.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 15
Example 4.15, A 60 cm diameter sewer is required to flow at
0.4 depth on a grade ensuring a degree of self cleansing equivalent
to that obtained at full depth at a velocity of 85 cmisec. Find the
required grade, associated velocities and rates of discharge at full/depth
and 0.4 depth. Take a uniform value of N = 0.015 at all depth of
flow.
Solution
(a) For the sewer running full. Va LRM si?
Here, V = 0.85 m/sec ; N = 0.015
D_06
=f=—=015
R 474 0.15m
1 U3 gd
.85 = ——_ (0.
0.85 = Gays (0.15)? S
‘ 1
Fi h = 0.00204 =
rom whic! Ss 04 02
Also, Q= 708 X 0,85 = 0.2403 cumecs.
(6) For partial depth flow
< = 0.4 (given)
8 d
9 21-2£=1-2x04=02
cos 5 D 1 x0.
8.46° ; 8 = 156.93° ; sin @ = 0.3919
7
6 _ sind
(sar Sa (4.12. a)
_ (156.93 _ 0.3919) _
= (7a ay ) = 03735
and [1 -3sine) wn(4.14)
[ 360 x 0.3919
~ "Bar (156.93)
‘Alternatively, the value of a/A and r/R can be found from Table
'8, for d/D = 0.4, if Table 4.8 is available)
Hence at 0.4 depth and a grade of 0.00204,
pe z) = (0.8568)"? = 09021
o v = 0.9021 x 0.85 = 0.767 m/sec
La(4 iv =
Also, 67 (a) x (77) = 03735 x 0.9021 = 03369
| = 0.8568
q = 0.3369 x 0.2403 = 0.081 cumecs.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 79
r
5s = 1.462 x 0.0027 = 0.00395= ——
Vv“
Me N(ryyee 176 — 0.938
Also, Vu alR) 1(0.684)'”* = 0.9387
vs = 0.9387 x 0.8 = 0.751 m/sec
and OH) (5) (rose xcs
qs = 0.252 x 0.9387 x 0.1005 = 0.0238 cumes
Alternatively, gs =@.¥. = 5A Vs
= 0.252 x Fo4y x 0.751 = 0.0238
4.7. EGG SHAPED SEWERS
Circular sewers are suitable only where variation in discharge
is not large. They are, therefore, suitable with separate sewerage
system. In the combined system, the discharge is subject to great
variation. The sewer is heavily taxed in the rainy season while the
D.W.F. during the summer may not be even 5 to 10 percent of
the combined discharge. Hence the circular sewer, if provided for
a combined system, will run with very low depths. For combined
system, therefore, egg shaped sewers, (also called ovoid sewers) are
more suitable. Their principal advantage is the slightly higher velocity
for low flows over the circular sewer of equal capacity. However,
egg shaped sewers have the following disadvantages :
(1.) An egg-shaped sewer is some what unstable because the
small end of the egg is down and it has to support the weight
of the upper broader section. (2.) It is more difficult to construct.
(3.) It is expensive, as more material is required and as the cost
of construction is also high. (4.) In the absence of adequate gradient,
it is not self-cleansing.
Egg-shaped sewers were formerly used more than at present.
Because of the disadvantages mentioned above, these are becoming
obsolete these days.
There are several forms of egg-shaped or ovoid sewers, but
the following two forms are very common (Fig. 4.10)
(é) Standard or metropolitan section.
(ii) New shaped section.
The geometrical characteristics of these two sections are given
in Table 4.9, in terms of radius b of the broader portion of theaa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 83
to,
es ‘STANDARD f
D SEWE! i:
oe Py ed
. f
z 07 we
& o6 é
5 o'5)
Z
4
bole
Eo3| ms ;
5 oat -
2 on =
0 Or 02 03 04 G6 07 08 OF TO MH t2
RATIO OF HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS
FIG. 4.11 VARIATION OF RATIOS OF HYDRAULIC ELEMENTS
OF STANDARD OVOID SEWERS
convert it into dimensions of an egg-shaped section having an equal
area.
Let D = diameter of hydraulically cquivalent circular section.
Do=top horizontal diameter of egg shaped section.
Using suffix 1 for the old (or standard or metropolitan section)
and 2 for the new section, we have.
D = 1.209 Do =(4.28 a)
and D=1.191De w(4.28 b)
For rouch calculations
D =1.20D) (4.28)
Thus, knowing D, the horizontal diameter Do can be very easily
worked out. -Table 4.10 gives the comparison of proportionate
velocities at small depths in circular and standard ovoid sections.
From the table, it will be seen that as the depth goes below 0.25
times the full depth, the proportionate velocity in egg shaped sewers
become higher than that in hydraulically equivalent circular section.
TABLE 4.10. COMPRESSION OF +/V IN CIRCULAR AND OVOID SEWERSaa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.aa
You have either reached a page that is unavailable for viewing or reached your viewing limit for this
book.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 87
and neatly finished. (5.) It should be structurally safe and stable.
(6.) It should be constructed with non-corrosive material and should
have sufficient resistance to erosion.
Shapes of surface drains. The following shapes are commonly
used for surface drains : (i) Rectangular section (Fig. 4.14 a), (ii)
Trapezoidal section (Fig. 4.14 5), (iii) Semi-circular section (Fig.
4.14 c), (iv) U-section (Fig. 4.14d) and (v) V-section (Fig. 4.14-e)
le) V-SHAPED
FIG. 4.14. COMMON SHAPES OF DRAINS.
Punjab State Classification of drains
TABLE 4.11. HYDRAULIC DATA OF PUNJAB TYPE
COMMON DRAIN SECTIONS.
HMD.
ForV=
(m) 0.75 misec
0.00381 1 in 150
0.06401 1 in 300
0.08230 1 In 400
0.09754 1 in 550
0.11582 1 in 650
0.13106 1_in 30088 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
Depending upon their crpss-section and discharge carrying
capacities, Punjab state has classified surface drains into 12 types.
Out of these, Type I to type/ VI are commonly used, and hence
these are shown in Fig. 4.15, The hydraulic data of these drain
sections, computed by Crimp 4nd Bruges formula, are given in Table
4. 11. The discharges are computed on the basis of self cleansing
velocity from 0.6 to 0.9 mec.
CONETTE.
€.[Link] OR LIME
CONCRETE
(0) TYPE |
oases ar}
bB2ae—ar-sem —ajeon
(ft) TYPE vi le) TYPE Vv
FIG. 4.15. PUNJAB STATE TYPE DRAINS.
Fixation of depth of large open drains. Large open drains
are either rectangular or trapezoidal section. The depth of these
drains is selected on the basis of certain empirical formulae/curves,
based on experimental results.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS
1. For drains having discharge upto 15 cumecs
y=05VB
where B =width of the drain
2. For drains having discharge between 15 to 300 cumecs.
(b)
The suggested values are given in Table 4.12
TABLE 4.12
3. C.W.C.’s Recommendations
(4.29)
The central water commission has given graphical relationship
between Bjy ratio and the discharge, as shown in Fig, 4.16.
DISCHARGE (cUMECS)
FIG. 4.16. CWC RECOMMENDATIONS.
Permissible velocities in the drains
TABLE 413. PERMISSIBLE VELOCITIES IN DRAINS
1. Rock and gravel
2. Murram, hard soil etc. 1.0 to 1.1
3. Sandy loam, black cotton soil 0.6 to 0.90
4. veal light loose sand to average sandy 03 to 0.6
5. Ordinary soils 06 to 09
Lined drains
1. Stone pitched
2. Burnt clay tile lined
3. Cement concrete lined90 ‘WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
The minimum velocity in a drain should be such that the
sediments in the flow do not settle. In other words, it should have
self-cleansing velocity. At the same time the maximum velocity should
be such that it does not erode the bed and sides of the drain. Such
a velocity is known as non-scouring velocity. Table 4.13 gives values
of permissible velocities in lined as well as unlined drains.
Example 4.21. Design an unlined trapezoidal section for the
outfall reach of a storm water drain collecting storm water from a
catchment of 50 hectares. The following information is available :
() Inlet time : 12 minutes
(ii) Time of Jom in the upper
reaches of the drain : 18 minutes
(iii) Rainfall during time of
concentration : 40 mm
(iv) Imperviousness factor 2 O55
(v) Design water surface slope : 1 in 2000
(vi)Maximum permissible velocity : 0.85 misec.
(vii) Mannings coefficient N : 0.025
Use Lloyed Davis formula.
Solution. Eq. 3.16 gives the Lloyed-Davis formula :
r
en?
where r =total rainfall, in mm, during time of concen-
tration = 40 mm.
t- = time of concentration, in minutes
= 12+ 18=30 minutes
P = impervious area in hectares
= 0.55 x 50 = 27.5 hectares
Q-5 39 * 275 = 6.111 cumecs.
Let us keep a water cepa of 1.2 m. Hence from Eq. 4.29
y=05VB
or 1.2=05VB
From which B=5.76 m. Hence keep y=1.2 m and B=5.8 m.
The drain will be in cutting all along. Provide side slopes
of 1:1 and a F.B. of 0.3 m. The section of the drain is shown in
Fig. 4.17. Longitudinal slope of the drain is 1 in 2000.
Now A=(B+y)y= (58+ 1.2)12=84m*
P=B+ 2v2y = 58 +2V¥12 (1.2) =9.194 m
AL <<
R=3= oa 0.9136 mHYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS, a
FIG. 4.17.
Now Q= WA RVs
=aa5 x 8.4 (0.9136)? V 1/2000 = 7.07 cumecs
Actual discharge= 6.111 cumecs only.
Hence keep a revised section of y= 1.2 m and B=5 m
A = (5 + 1.2) 1.2 = 7.44 m*
P=5+2V2 (1.2) =8394 m
R= TANBS94 = 0.886 m
= app5 X74 (0.886)? V 1/2000 = 6.139 cumecs.
Hence OK.
Now -2. $. ue 0.82 mec.
This is less tian permissible value of 0.85 m/sec. Hence the
designed section is satisfactory.
PROBLEMS
1. (a) What do you understand by the terms ‘self-cleansing velocity’ and
‘limiting velocity’ in sewers ?
(6) Derive an expression for the self cleansing velocity in the form:
vey Bo,- Ded,
2. A circular sewer, 50 cm in diameter is laid at a gradient of 1 in
200. Using N = 0.0125 in Manning’s formula calculate velocity, disharge
and Chezy’s coefficent when the sewer is running full.
Ans. [1.414 mfec, 0.2777 m’/sec; 56.56]
3. Circular sewer of 0.5 m diameter is laid at a gradient of 1 in 300.
Calculate the velocity of flow and discharge in the sewer when the
sewer is running half fall. Use Manning’s formula taking N=0.0125.
Ans. [1.155 m/sec; 0.1134 m°/sec}
4 (a) A 40 cm sewer having invert slope of 1 in 200 was flowing full.
What would the velocity of flow and discharge, if N = 0.013 ? Is
the velocity self-cleansing ?WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
(6) What would be the velocity and the discharge when the above
sewer is flowing at 0.4 of the full depth ?
[@) 1.1719 misec; 0.1473 m*/sec (b) 1.057 m/sec; 0.0497 m°/sec]
Design a sewer to serve a population of 36000 ; the daily per capita
water supply allowance being 135 litres of which 80 per cent finds
it way into the sewer. The slope available for the sewer to be laid
is 1 in 625 and the sewer should be designed to carry four times
the dry weather flow ‘when running full. What would be the velocity
of flow in the sewer when running full ? Assume N = 0.012 in Manning’s
formula. (UPSC Engg. Services, 1970)
Ans. [D = 0.31m;V = 2.39 m/sec]
Find the minimum velocity and hydraulic gradient required to transport
sand through a sewer of 1 m dia. with sand particles of 0.8 mm
dia and specific gravity 2.65. Assume value of 6 = 0.04 and f = 0.02.
Assume sewer to run full. What will be the gradient if the sewer
runs half full ? Take N = 0.012.
Ans. [0.455; 1/5283; 1/5283]
Design a outfall circular sewer of the separate system for a town
with a population of 1,00,000 persons with a water supply at 180
litres per head per day. The ‘sewer can be laid at a slope of 10 in
10,000 with n = 0.012. A self-cleansing velocity of 0.75 m/sec is to
be developed. The dry weather flow may be taken as 4 of the maximum
discharge. Given the following table :
(U.P.S.C. Engg. Services, 1975 ) Ans. [D =0.915 m ]
A circular sanitary sewer is designed to carry the maximum flow of
sewage while flowing 70% full at a velocity of 0.95 m/sec. The ratio
of maximum/average and average/minimum flows are 2.5 and 2 respec-
tively. Find out : (i) Proportionate depth of flow, and (ii) Velocities
of flow generated at the time of (a) average and (6) minimum flow.
Neglect the variation in the values of N.
Ans. [ (a) d/D = 0.44; v = 0.898 misec.
(6) diD = 030; v = 0.739 m/sec.)
Write notes on :
(a) Self-cleansing velocity (b) Non-scouring ‘velocity (c) Hydraulically
equivalent section (d) Circular and egg shaped sewer sections.HYDRAULIC DESIGN OF SEWERS 3
10.
11.
13.
14,
15.
16.
17.
Find the relation between the side a square section of one sewer
and the diameter of a circular section of another sewer when both
are hydraulically equivalent.
(AMIE : 1974)
Ans. [D = 1.094 B]
Determine the size of a circular sewer for a discharge of 1.2 cumecs
running half full. Assume a grade of 1 in 2000 and N = 0.013.
‘Ans, [D = 1.754 m]
A circular sewer of 1 m dia. carries a certain discharge while running
full. What will be the depth of flow and the corresponding velocity
ratio if the discharge in the sewer is reduced to 5 rd the value ?
Assume that N remains constant with depth.
Ans. [0.3978; 0.8997]
A rectangular sewer with width 1.5 times it depth is hydraulically
equivalent to a circular one. Find the relation between the width of
the rectangular sewer and the diameter of the circular sewer.
(AMLE. 1975)
Ans. [ D = 1.0438]
Design an out fall sewer in the separate system for a town with a
population of 90,000 persons with water supply of 200 litres per head
per day. The sewer is to be of brickwork rendered smooth with cement
mortar (N = 0.012) . The permissible slope is 1 in 1000. A self-cleansing
velocity of 0.75 metres per second is to be developed. The D.W.F.
may be taken as 4 rd of the maximum discharge.
What is the equivalent egg-shaped section of this cireular section?
Calculate the velocity in the new section when flowing full and at
[Link].
Ans. [D = 0825 m;b = 675m; 1.1m/sec.]
Develop a relation between the diameter of circular section of a drain
and a side of a rectangular section having width as twice its depth.
The rectangular drain is open from the top.
Ans. [H = 06D]
A 50 cm dia. sewer is required to flow at half-depth on a grade
ensuring a degree of self cleansing equivalent to that obtained at full
depth of a velocity of 0.9 m/sec. Find the required grade, associated
velocities and discharges at full depth and half depth. Take a uniform
value of N = 0.015.
“Ans. [(a) 1343; 0.9 m/sec; 0.1767 cumecs
(6) 1/343; 0.9 misec; 0.8835 cumecs.]
A_ 50 cm dia. sewer is to discharge 0.1 cumecs at a velocity as self-
cleansing as a sewer running full at 0.9 m/sec. Find the depth and
velocity of flow and the required slope. Take uniform value of
N =0013.
Ans. [0.274 m; 0.908 m/sec; 1/482.8]Construction of Sewers
5.1. INTRODUCTION: TYPES OF SEWERS
A sewer is an under ground conduit or drain through which
sewage is conveyed to the point of discharge or disposal.
Main sewer or trunk sewer is a sewer that receives sewage
from many tributary branches and sewers, serving as an outlet for
a large territory.
Branch sewer or submain sewer is a sewer which receives sewage
from a relatively small area, usually a few laterals, and dishcarge
into a main sewer.
Lateral sewer is a sewer which collects sewage directly from
the houses. It indicates the first stage of sewage collection.
Separate sewers ate those which carry the house hold and
industrial wastes only.
Storm water drains are those which carry rain water from roofs
and street surfaces.
Combined sewers are those which carry both sewage and storm
water.
House sewer (a drain) is a pipe carrying away the sewage
from a building to a street sewer.
Depressed sewer is a section of sewer contructed lower than
adjacent sections, to pass beneath an obstacle or obstruction. It runs
full under the force of gravity.
Intercepting sewer is a sewer laid transversely to a general sewer
system to intercept the dry weather flow (D.W.F.) of sewage and
such additional surface and storm water as may be desirable. An
intercepting sewer is usually’a large sewer, flowing parallel to a
(94)CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 95
natural drainage channel, into which a number of main or outfall
sewers discharge.
Outfall sewer is a sewer that receives the sewage from the
collecting systems and conducts it to a point of final discharge or
to a disposal plant.
Relief sewer or overflow sewer is a sewer built to carry the
flow in excess of the capacity of existing sewer.
5.2. MATERIALS FOR SEWERS
Sewers may be made of one of the following materials :
(1) Asbestos cement (2) Plain or reinforced cement concrete
(3) Vitrified clay or stoneware (4) Brick (5) Cast iron (6) Steel
(7) Plastic
While selecting a particular material of a sewer, the following
factors must be carefully considered :
1. Hydraulic efficiency: The material selected should be such
that value of Manning’s coefficient N is as low as possible so that
a hyraulically efficient surface is available.
2. Resistance to abrasion: The flowing sewage may contain
a lot of solids such as grit and sand particles. At a high velocity
at the sewage invert, erosion of sewer material may take place due
to abrasion. For a longer life, the sewer material must possess high
degree of resistance to abrasion.
3. Resistance to corrosion : The composition of sewage may
be such that the sewer material may get corroded. For longer life,
the sewer material should possess enough resistence to corrosion.
4. Strength : The sewers are generally laid underground and
hence they are subjected to a number of external forces, including
the weight of overburden and the vehicular/live loads. The material
should of strong enough to resist all such external forces.
5. Durability : The sewer material should be durable so that
expenditure due to its frequent replacement is minimum.
6. Cost: The cost of the material should be less so that overall
economy is achieved in its construction.
7. Weight: The material should be light in weight so that it
can be easily handled and transportation costs are also less.
8. Imperviousness#The sewer material should be imperivous
and should not allow seepage of the sewage from the sewer.
1. Asbestos cement sewers. These sewer pipes are made from
a mixture of asbestos fibre, cement and silica, The asbestos fibre
serves as a reinforcing material. The mixture of these constituents
are converted into a dense homogencous material under pressure.
These pipes are available in various sizes ranging from 75 mm to96
WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
500 mm in diameter and 3 to 4 metres in length. These pipes possess
the following advantages.
(i) These pipes possess considerable strength against internal
pressure. (ii) They are light in weight, due to which these can be
easily handled. (iii) They can be. easily cut and easily joined. (iv)
These pipes offer good resistance to salts, and other corrosive materials
normally present in the sewers. (v) The inside surface is relatively
smooth. Hence they are hydraulically more efficient.
However these pipes possess the
following disadvantages : (i) They are
brittle. They are weak against impact
forces. Hence careless handling may
result in their breaking. (ii) They have
less structural strength against heavy
external forces. (iii) These are suscep-
tible to sulphide corrosion. Duc to these
disadvantages they are used only as
verticals.
2. Plain or reinforced cement
concrete. Cement concrete pipes can
either be plain (for small diameters)
or reinforced. Plain cement concrete
pipes are used from 80 mm to 450
mm, with their thickness varying from
25 to 35 mm. For bigger diameters,
these are refinforced, consisting of lon-
gitudinal and transverse reinforcement
in the form of rings or elliptical cage,
as shown in Fig. 5.1.
The reinforcement pattern
shown in Fig.5.1(a) is suitable upto
diameter of 800 mm, and when pipe
is subjected to internal pressure only,
while the ‘one Shown in ‘Fig. 5.1(6)
is suitable for\greater diameter pipes
specially when they are subjected to
internal as well as external pressures.
The pattern shown in Fig.5.1(c) uses
elliptical cage (in place of rings) and
is suitable for large diameter pipes
which are subjected to external pres-
sure only, as is the normal case for
sewers.
(b)
te)
FIG. 5.1.CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 7
In order to achieve adequate strength and imperviousness, rich
quality cement concrete should be used. The usual mix is 1: 15:3.
The grading and mixing of the aggregate should be proper, with
the max. size of aggregates limited to 6 mm. The water-cement ratio
usually varies between 0.5 to 0.7 depending upon the thickness of
the pipe and equipment used for placing and compacting the concrete.
The placing of cement concrete should take place immediately after
its preparation. The concrete should be placed in such a way that
it completely surrounds the circumferential reinforcement.
The R.C.C. pipes can be manufactured by the following three
different processes :
(1) The concrete is poured by ordinary method around the
reinforcement cage, and tamped. This is known as stationary method.
(2) The mould or form containing fabricated reinforcement and
concrete of proper grade is made to rotate rapidly about the pipe
axis. The centrifugal force so created throws the concrete outwards
and spreads it in uniform layer over the internal surface of the
mould, embeding the reinforcement. Such a pipe is some times
known as the centrifugal type pipe. (3) The pipes may be made by
lining thin cylindrical steel shells, both internally and externally, with
rich cement concrete. Such pipes are known as cylinder types pipes.
Hume steel pipes, a patented form of RCC pipes, also falls under
this category. They are available in size varying from 100 mm to
2400 mm in dia. and 900 mm to 2400 mm in length.
Cement concrete pipes possess the following advantages
(1) Cement concrete pipes are equally strong, both under
internal pressure (to be used as pressure sewer) as well as external
pressures. Thus, these pipes can withstand both tensile as well as
compressive stresses. (2) These can be made of any desired strength
by proper design of mix, thickness and reinforcement. (3) These
can be easily manufactured even at the site. They can also be cast
in-situ with the help of special forms. (4) They are economical for
medium and large sized installations. They are, therfore, widely used
for main sewers and branch sewers.
Disadvantages
The biggest disadvantage of concrete sewers are that they get
easily corroded and pitted because of the corrosive action of the
contents of the sewage. Such a corrosion is known as crown corrosion
caused due to the phenomenon explained below.
Crown corrosion
‘The basic cause of crown corrosion is the formation of H; S gas
due to aerobic and anaerobic conditions prevalent in the lower layers98 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
FIG. 5.2. CROWN CORROSION
of wastewater (sewage) which contain nitrogen, calcium, phosphorous,
chlorides, sulphates etc. Because of bacterial action, the sulphates
are reduced to sulphides and to hydrogen sulphide as under :
Bacteria
SOg~ + organic mater
S"-+2Ht He
The hydrogen sulphide gas so produced is malodourous and
inflammable, having odour like rotten eggs, due to which blackening
of sewage takes place. Thiobacillus thioxidans bacteria convert the
H2S gas into H2SO« as under :
Bacteria
HS + 202 H2SO4
The H2SOg so formed is collected into the droplet form at
the crown of the sewer, and acts with concrete to form CaSO,,
resulting in crown corrosion. This not only reduces the life span
of sewers but also reduces their carrying capacity with time. Apart
from crown-corrosion, concrete pipes are also susceptical to erosion
due to high velocity of sewage containing too much silt and grit.
In order to protect concrete pipes against such erosion and
crown corrosion, their interiors are lined with vitrified clay lining
shown in Fig. 15.3. The blocks of vitrified clay, provided with projec-
tions, are fixed in cement concrete. The joints between the adjacent
blocks are filled either with rich cement mortar or with bituminous
compounds.
Methods of reducing crown corrosion
(1) Lining the concrete pipes by vitrified clay blocks. (2)
Ventilating the sewers. (3) Making the sewers run full. (4) Pretreating
the sewage so as to reduce sulphate contents. (5) Prohibiting the
entry of wastes containing sulphides. (6) Aerating and chlorinating
sewage. (7) Neutralising sulphides by addition of chemicals.
S”~ + H2:0 + CO2CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 9
YTS. FILLED WITH RICH MORTAR
OR BITUMINOUS MATERIAL,
2 : PROJECTIONS
CEMENT CONCRETE
PIPE
FIG. 5.3. VITRIFIED CLAY LINING.
3. Vitrified clay or stoneware sewers. These pipes are manufac-
tured from clays and shales of special qualities and grades, using
hot process. The ingradients are taken in desired proportions, ground
to desired fineness and mixed together with water. Pipes are then
formed in pipe press, at a specified pressure (about 0.85 N/mm?)
in desired diameters and lengths. The pipes so formed are first dried
in warm air and then burnt into a kiln through a well regulated
temperature gradually raised from 150°C in the beginning to about
700°C at the end. The vitrification is achieved at a higher temperature
of about 1200°C, during which the surface of pipe is glazed by adding
small quantity of sodium chloride salt to the kiln. However, in order
to make the joints water tight, the exterior surface of spigot and
the interior surface of socket are not glazed.
Advantages of vitrified pipes : (1) They are highly resistant to
sulphide corrosion. (2) They possess enough resistance to crosion
due to grit and silt. (3) Because of smooth interior, they are hydraulically
efficient. (4) They are highly imperious. (5) Though weak in tension,
they possess high compressive strength. Hence they are quite suit-
able for withstanding external loads such as back fill pressure, super-
imposed load etc. They are suitable for use even upto a depth of
4.5 to 5 m. (6) They are cheap and easily available.
Disadvantages : (1) They are weak in tension. Hence these
cannot be used for locations where sewage flows under pressure.
(2) They are brittle in nature, and are therefore likely to be damaged
during transportation. (3) They are quite bulky and heavy. Hence
their handling, laying and transportation is difficult.
Because of the above difficulties, they are used only for house
drainage and for laterals. They are manufactured only in short lengths
ranging from 0.3 m to 0.9 m, and in small diameters, ranging from
0.1 m to 03 m.
4. Brick Sewers. Bricks are being used for constructing sewers
since olden days. The earliest forms of sewers were made from bricks,
though these have now been replaced with the advent of cement
concrete. They are still preferred for constructing at site large sized100 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
combined sewers. For construction of such sewers, purpose-made
bricks are used instead of routine building bricks. Brick sewers should
be plastered from outside, so as to make it impervious against ground
water. They are also lined inside with stoneware or ceramic blocks.
Such a lining makes the sewer smooth and hydraulically more efficient,
and also provide resitance against sulphide corrosion.
5. Cast iron sewers. Cast iron pipes possess high strength.
They are structurally stronger to withstand tensile, compressive as
well as bending stresses. They are available in diameter ranging from
150 mm to 750 mm and lengths upto 3 to 3.5 m. They can be
easily acted upon by the acids present in the sewage, unless properly
protected by coating it with paint or cement concrete. However,
they are relatively costlier, and are therefore adopted only under
the following circumstances:
(i) Heavy external loads : They are suitable at places where
heavy external loads on sewers exist, such as sewer linés below railway
lines, roads, foundation walls, high overburden of soil etc.
(ii) High intemal pressure ; They are preferred when sewage
flows under pressure. Such situations arise for conveying sewage
through pumping statious and treatment works.
(iii) Crosssing low level areas : They are used at locations
when sewers are to be carried over trestles or pipes, while crossing
low lying areas.
(iv) Under expensive road surface : They are preferred for sewers"
laid under cement concrete roads where it is not possible to disturb
‘the road surface for the purpose of frequent repairs of the sewers.
(v). Protection against contamination : They are used where
these is danger of contamination of ground water due to leakage
of sewage through walls of sewers. Cast iron pipes are 100% leak
proof. They are also preferred when sewers are to be laid under
or over water supply lines.
(vi) Temperature variations : Cast iron sewers are highly suitable
where there is large variation in temperature during a day or during
the year.
(vii) Virbrations : C.1. sewers are suitable for running through
the ground which is susceptible due to heavy movements and vibrations.
C.l. sewers are considered to be quite rigid.
(viii) Wet ground conditions : Because of their imperviousness,
they are quite suitable for wet ground conditions, without fear of
- intiltration.
6. Steel Sewers. Sewers made of steel pipes are used at those
locations where high external and or internal pressures are encountered.
They are perfectly impervious. They are light in weight. BecauseCONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 101
of their flexibility, they can absorb vibrations and shock loads. They _
are used for mains, outfall and trunk sewers having large diameters.
They are made corrosion resistant either by heavy galvanisation or
by bituminous coatings. Sometimes, special corrosion resistant steef
plates may be used for manufacturing steel pipes. The greatest advantage
is that these sewers can be easily welded. However, the cost of such
sewers is quite high in comparison to C.]. sewers.
7. Plastic sewers. The use of plastics for sewer line is of
recent origin, and is still in experimental stage. Use of uPVC pipes
for sewer lines started in countries like Netherlands, Scandinavia,
France etc, and is not spreading in other countries with the advent
of improved technology in the manufacture of such pipes. In India,
their use has recently started in the form of domestic sewers. Such
pipes have high hydraulic efficiency, thus permitting flatter slopes,
because of very low coefficient of friction. They are corrosion resistant.
They are available in longer lengths, can be jointed easily and permit
cold negotiation of bends.
5.3, JOINTS IN SEWERS
Sewer joints can be of the following types :
(1) Bell and spigot joint. (2) Collar joints. (3) Simplex joints.
(4) Flexible or bituminous joints. (5) Mechanical joints. (6) Open
joints.
1, Bell and spigot joint. Such joints are quite common in
plain or reinforced concrete pipes. Each pipe has a spigot end and
a bell or socket end. Cement mortar of proportion 1: 1 or 1 :
2 is inserted between the space of the bell end and spigot end,
as shown in Fig 5.4. Gasket or jute packing may be placed in the
inner side, to maintain the alignment of the sewer. The mortar caulked
joint is finished at about 45° on the outer face.
2. Collarjoints. For such a joint, the plain ends of the consecutive
lengths of pipes are kept near each other and a collar of slightly
BELL OR
SOCKET END
Zo
Rwanencveravewes «| Lowwmaresss)
N
CEMENT
MORTAR
SPIGOT
ESStyrsssssensg 7777777777)
R y
LL)
FIG. 5.4. BELL AND SPIGOT JOINT102 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
AS,
ESSSSSSUSSSST SY
P7777 TTT ZA
FIG. 5.5. COLLAR JOINT
bigger diameter is placed around. The annular space between the
collar and the ends of the pipes is then filled with cement mortar
of 1:1 proportion. Such joints are used for concrete pipes of larger
diameters.
3. Simplex joint. Simplex joint, also known as ring tie coupling,
is similar to collar joints, and are used for asbestos cement pipes.
The joint, shown in Fig. 5.6, consists of a pipe sleeve or coupling
of asbestos cement and two rubber rings which are compressed between
the exteror of the pipes and the interior of the sleeve. Such a joint
is quite flexible.
beerereer errr ererere ere rTT
WSs
FIG. 5.6. SIMPLEX JOINT FOR AC. PIPES.
4. Flexible or bituminous joint. The collar joint shown in
Fig. 5.5, using cement mortar is relatively rigid. Such joints crack
easily due to even slight movement of pipes duc to settlement etc.
These joints are made flexible by using bitumen or bituminous com-
pounds instead of cement mortar.
5. Mechanical joints. Such joints use mechanical devices like
flanged rings, bolts, screwed ends etc to keep the two ends together.
They are used for metallic sewers made of cast iron, steel etc.
6. Open joints. If there is no objection to infiltration, open
joints are adopted. The bell and spigot ends are simply placed together,CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 103
without inserting filling material in the annular space. Gasket may
however be inserted, to maintain alignment. The joint is merely covered
with tar paper, to prevent entry of subsoil into the sewer.
5.4. SHAPES OF SEWERS
Sewers of circular cross-section are more commonly used because
of the following advantages :
(a) STANDARD OVOID (b>) NE
~ SECTION Setron
@
(¢) HORSE SHOE (6) PARABOLIC
SECTION SECTION
Ge) SEMI-ELUPTICAL (t) SEMI-CIRCULAR
‘SECTION ‘SECTION
(9) U-SHAPED
‘SECTION
FIG. 5.7. SHAPES OF NON-CIRCULAR SECTIONS.104 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
(1) Circular sewers are easily manufactured. (2) A circular
sewer gives the maximum area for a given perimeter and thus gives
the greatest H.M.D. when running full or half full. It is therefore
the most efficient section at these flow conditions. (3) It is the
most economical section since is utilises minimum quantities of the
material. (4) Circular section has uniform curvature all round and
hence it offers less opportunities for deposits.
Following are the non-circular shapes of sewers (Fig. 5.7)
(1) Standard egg shaped or ovoid section (Fig. 5.7 a). (2) New
ovoid section. (Fig. 5.7 6). (3) Horse shoe section. (Fig. 5.7 c). (4)
Parabolic section. (Fig. 5..7 d). (5) Semi-elliptic section. (Fig. 5.7 e).
(6) Semi-circular section. (Fig. 5.7 f). (7) U-Shaped section. (Fig 5.7 g).
(8) Basket handle section (Fig 5.7 4). (9) Rectangular section. (Fig.
5.7 i)
All of the above shapes, except for the ovoid sections and
Tectangular section, have practically become obsolete because of the
difficulty in their construction and because of non-availability of factory
made sections of these shapes. However, ovoid shaped sewers are
still in use as combined sewers. In the
combined system, the discharge is subject
to great variation. The sewer is heavily
taxed in the rainy season while the D.W.F.
during the summer may not be even 5
to 10% of the combined sewer. Hence
the circular sewer, if provided for the
combined sewer system, will run with very
low depths. In such circumstances, ovoid
sewers are more suitable. Its main ad- FIG. 5.8. RECTANGULAR
vantage is that it gives slightly higher SECTION
velocity during low flow than a circular sewer of the same capacity.
Rectanular section (Fig. 5.8) are mainly used as independant covered
storm water surface drains rather than as sewers.
5.5. FORCES ON SEWERS
The following forces/stresses may act on sewers :
1. Internal pressure of sewage. 2. Temperatuie stresses
3. Forces due to external loads (a) Backfill loads (b) Super-
imposed loads. 4. Flexural stresses.
1. Internal pressure due to sewage : Most of the sewers are
designed to flow under gravity. However, due to overflow of sewers
‘and chancy surcharge, the sewers may be subjected to internal pressure.
Also, in outfall sewers, which have to flow under pressure, internal
pressure is developed. The internal pressure (p) duc to sewage flow
Causes hoop stress (tensile) the magnitude of which is given byCONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 105
a2
pes, - (5.1)
where Pt = tensile hoop stress ; p = internal pressure
D=diameter of sewer ; f= thickness of shell.
Hence pressure sewers must be designed to withstand the
above stress.
2. Temperature stresses. The sewers are subjected to temperature
stresses if they are laid above the ground and exposed to atmosphere.
The change in the temperature gives rise to temperature stresses,
specially when the sewers are not free to expand. The magnitude
of tempeature stress is given by :
f=E,.at «(5.2)
where f = temperature stress induced.
@ = coefficient of thermal expansion for the pipe material
t=change in the temperature |
E, = modulus of elasticity of the pipe matterial.
In order to counteract or reduce temperature stresses, special
types of expansion joints are provided at an interval of 20 to 30
m. However, most of the sewers are buried underground and hence
they are not subjected to temperature stresses.
5.6. LOADS ON SEWERS DUE TO BACK FILL
Sewers, commonly called conduits for the perposes of load
analysis, are subjected to loads due to backfill, when they are buried
under ground. Methods of determining the vertical load on buried
conduits due to gravity earth forces in commonly encountered con-
ditions, as developed by A. Marston, are generally accepted as the
most suitable and reliable for computations. Theoretically stated,
the load on buried conduit is equal to the weight of prism of soil
directly over the conduct, plus or minus the frictional shear forces
transferred to the prism by the adjacent prism of soil.
The general form of Marston formula is :
W.=[Link] (5.3)
where W. = vertical load per unit length acting on the
conduit due to backfill
y = unit weight of backfill
B =width of the ditch or trench,
C = load coefficient.
Underground conduits (sewers) may fall under the following
three categories depending upon the types of installations or con-
struction conditions :
1, Trench ditch condition 2. Embankment condition,
and 3. Tunnel condition.‘WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
106
SNOLLIGNOD LNANAIVId JO SISV€ AHL NO SLINGNOO dO NOLLVOIAISSV1D “6's “OLA
@) (a) (0)
WMaxovE
a
NOILIQNOS HONSEL
NOILIGNOD LN3W39V 1dCONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 107
The conduits under trench or ditch conditions are also known
as ditch conduits. Trench condition exists when the conduit is installed
in a relatively narrow trench (of width Bz) cut out of undisturbed
soil and then covered with soil backfill upto to the original ground
surface. If the trench or ditch has sloping sides, the value of Ba
will be taken equal to width of horizontal plane tangential to the
top of the conduit.
Embankment condition prevails under two circumstances : (i)
when the conduit is covered with fill above the original ground surface,
or (ii) when the trench in undisturbed ground is so wide that the
trench friction does not affect the load on the conduit. Depending
upon the position of the top of the conduit in relation to the original
ground surface, the embankment conditions is further subdivided
as follows :
(@) Positive projecting condition (Fig.5.9d)
(6) Zero projecting condition (Fig.5.9e)
(c) Negative projecting condition. (Fig.5.9f/)
@) Imperfect trench condition. (Fig.5.9g)
It has been found experimentally that when the width (B.)
of the trench is not more than external width (B.) of the conduit,
trench condition holds good, while if By exceds three times B., em-
bankment condition holds good. For transition width By = 2B. to
Ba =3B., computations of load by adopting both the conditions
give the same results.
Tunnel condition exists when the sewer is laid more than 9
to 12 m deep either by. jacking
or by tunnelling, and not, by con-
ventional method of excavating the
trench and then back filling it. The
tunnel is excavated, the soil all
round is supported by suitable
means, the conduit is laid in posi-
tion, and the space between the
tunnel and the conduit is finally
filled up with compacted soil or
concrete grout, as shown in Fig.
5.10.
Loads on conduit in trench
condition. Such a condition exists
in most of the cases. The sewers
are laid in trenches/ditches ex-
cavated in natural soil and then
covered by refilling the trench to FIG. 5.10. CONDUIT IN TUNNEL.108 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
its orginal ground level, as shown in Figs. 5.9 (a), (6), (c).
The load on rigid conduit laid in trench condition is given
by Marston’s formula :
We = Ca.y Bi G4)
where Bz = width of the trench at the top of the conduit
Ca = load coefficient which is a function of the ratio of
height (H) of the fill to width (Bu) of the trench,
and the friction coefficient (4') between the backfill
and the sides ofthe trench, and its value is given by
1 — en 2Kw HBa .
Ca = [ IK | wn(5.4.4)
where K is the ratio of lateral unit pressure and vertical unit pressure.
The value of the coefficient Cz can be obtained from curves
of Fig, 5.11, for various values of H/Ba plotted for several kinds
of filling materials having different values of Ku’ (Spanglar, 1963).
For curve ©, K ‘#' = 0.1924 (minimum for granular materials without
VALUES OF
VALUES OF COEFFICIENT Cq
FIG. 5.11. CURVES FOR Ca FOR DITCH CONDUITCONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 109
cohesion); for curve (b), Ku’ = 0.165 (maximum for sand and gravel);
for curve (c), Ku’ = 0.150 (maximum for saturated top soil), for curve
(d), Kyu’ = 0.130 (ordinary maximum for clay), and for curve (e),
Ky' = 0.110 (max. for saturated clay). In cases of excavations with
sloping sides (possible in undeveloped areas), the provision of sub-
trench (Fig. 5.9 b, c) minimises the load on the pipe by reducing
the value of Bz where Bz, will be equal to the width of horizontal
plane tangential to the top of the conduit.
The load on flexible conduit laid in trench condition is given
by the following expression
W. = Cay Be. Ba w(5.5)
where B, = outside width (diameter) of the condult.
The value of unit weight y for common backfill materials
may be taken from Table 5.1.
TABLE 5.1. WEIGHT OF COMMON BACKFILL MATERIALS.
Type of backfill Unit weight y (kg/m?)
Dry sand 1600
Ordinary (damp) sand 1840
Wet sand 1920
Damp clay 1920
Saturated clay
Saturated top soil
Sand and damp soil
Loads on conduits in embankment condition
(a) Positive projecting conduits
Positive projecting conduits are of four types :
1, Complete trench or ditch condition. 2. Complete projection
condition. 3. Incomplete trench or ditch condition. 4. Incomplete
projection condition.
In order to understand the basic difference between all the
four types, consider Fig. 5.12.
s When a positive projecting conduit is installed, the plane along
which relative movements occur, and on which shearing forces are
generated are considered,to be imaginary vertical planes extending
upwards from the sides of the conduits as shown in Fig. 5.12. The
magnitude and direction of relative movement between the interior
and exterior prisms are dependent upon the settlement ratio r,q defined
by the following equation :
ng = Sm + Sp) ~ (Sp + de) (5.6)
Sm110 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
FIG. 5.12. POSITIVE PROJECTING CONDUIT.
where ‘Sm = Compression strain of side prisms of soil of height
p-B
P = projection ratio= ratio of the distance from the
natural ground surface tothe top of the conduit
to its width B..
S, =settlment of natural ground surface adjacent to
the conduit.
Sf =settlement of the conduit into its foundation.
d. = shortening of vertical height of the conduit.
‘The critical plane is a horizontal plane, tangential to the top
of the conduit. If the critical plane settles more than the top of
the conduits, ie. if (Sm + Sz) is more than (S;+ d-), the settlement
ratio is positive. Hence the exterior prisms move downward relative
to the interior prism, the shearing forces are directed downwards
and hence the load on the conduit is increased. This is known as
projection condition. If, however, the critical plane settles less than
the top of the conduit, ie. of (Sm + 5,)< (Sf + dc), the settlement
ratio is negative. The interior prism moves downwards relative toCONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 1
the exterior prisms, shearing forces are directed upwards and hence
the load is less than the weight of soil directly above the structure.
This is called the trench condition or ditch condition because the
shearing forces act in the same direction as in the case of ditch
condition.
Both the projection conditions and the trench conditions of a
positive projecting conduit may be complete or incomplete, depending
upon the position of plane of equal settlement. Above the plane
of equal settlement, the interior and exterior prisms settle equally,
and hence no shearing forces are generated above this plane. If
the embankment is sufficiently high, the plane of equal settlement
may be within the embankment. This condition is then called in-
complete projection condition or incomplete trench or ditch condition,
as the case may be. If, however, the embankment is not of sufficient
height, the plane of equal settlement does not fall within the em-
bankment (ie. H. > H); such a condition is called complete projection
condition or complete trench or ditch condition.
TABLE 5.2. VALUES OF rst RECOMMENDED FOR USE IN DESIGN
(AFTER SPANGLAR)
Rock or hard +10
unyielding soil
Ordinary soil. | 0.5 to 08
Yielding soil 0 to +5
Uncertain
(use complete
projection
value of Ce)
-03
The product-r.q x p gives the relative height of plane of equal
settlement and hence the magnitude of the shear component of the112 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
load. When rs x p = 0, the plane of equal settlement coincides with
the critical plane and there are no shearing forces and the load
is equal to the weight of the central prism. It is not practicable
to predetermine the value of r;¢. However, recommended design values
Of req are given in Table 5.2. Marston gave the following expression
for the load in positive projecting conduits (both rigid and flexible):
We = Ce.y Be (5.7)
where W.= load on conduit in kg per metre length.
y = unit weight of soil (kg/m’)
B. = outside width of conduit (m)
C. = load coefficient which is a function of the product of
projection ratio and the settlement ratio and the height of fill above
the top of the conduit to the out side width of the conduit
(H/B.). It is also influenced by the product of the coefficient of
internal friction (”) of the backfill materal and the Rankine’s ratio
of lateral pressure to vertical pressure (K). Suggested values of Ku
for positive and negative settlement ratios are 0.19 and 0.13 respectively.
=x
Be
wo
VALUES OF
w
VALUES OF COEFFICIENT Cc
FIG. 5.13. CURVES FOR DETERMINATION OF C- FOR POSITIVE
PROJECTING CONDUITS (SPANGLAR, 1963)CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 113
The values of C. can be obtained from the curves of Fig.5.13.
Alternatively, C. can be computed from the following equation.
et Ke H/Bey- 1
CC. =—————__ w(5.7 a)
+2Ku
using + sign for complete projection and -sign for complete
trench condition.
For incomplete trench condition or in complete projection _
condition.
© Ky (H/Be) ~ 1 H i
+2Kpz * Be Be
using + sign for incomplete projection conduit and minus sign
incomplete trench conduit.
(6) Negative projecting conduits. As shown in Fig. 5.9 (f),
a conduit is said to be laid in a negative projecting condition when
the trench in which it is laid is
narrow with respect to the size > ee
of the pipe and shallow with
Tespect to the depth of cover. The
trench is refilled with loose H
be, — NATURAL
4 G.L.
C )ernneete (5.7 @)
material and the embankment is
constructed, as shown in Fig. 5.14.
Thus, the exterior prisms of the
embankment materials are not so
high as the prism within the width
of the trench above the conduit.
Due to this, the interior prism
always settles more, and the shear-
ing stresses on it act in the upward
direction, thereby reducing the
load on the conduit to a value
lesser than the weight of the interior prism.
The critical plane passes through the top of the trench. The
settlement ratio rsa for the negative projecting conduit is given by
= So Get oe) (5.8)
Nd
where Sa = deformation of fill in trench within height p’ By
p' = projection ratio of negative projecting conduit.
=ratio of height of the ditch above the top of the
conduit to the width of the ditch.
The settlement ratio for a negative projecting conduit is always
negative since the settlement of the critical plane is more than the
settlement of the natural ground. Hence r4.p' is also negative.
FIG. 5.14. NEGATIVE PROJECTING
CONDUIT
Tod114 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
TOP OF EMBANKMENT
PLANE OF EQUAL SETTLEMENT
4 777 SHE ARING FORCES
INDUCED BY
SETTLEMENT
NATURAL GROUND
FIG. 5.15 ELEMENTS OF SETTLEMENT RATIO IN A NEGATIVE
PROJECTING CONDUIT
The load on negative projecting conduit is given by
W. =Cn.y Ba (5.9)
where C, = load coefficient for negative projecting conduit
which is a function of H/Bz ratio, p’ and rsd.
Coefficient C, can be found from curves. One such set of
curves, for p’ = 1, is given in Fig. 5.16.
(c) Imperfect ditch conduit. Imperfect ditch conduit, somewhat
similar to a negative projecting conduit, is a special technique of
construction by which the load on the conduit is very much reduced
so that the conduit can support a greater height of embankment.
Fig. 5.17 shows two stages of construction of such a conduit.
In the first stage of construction, the conduit is installed as
a positive projection conduit, and a fill is constructed over it upto
a height of p’ B, (1 to 1 5 Bc). The fill is well compacted. In the second
Stage a trench of width B. is dug above the conduit, down to the
top of the conduit. The trench is refilled with material placed in
the loosest possible manner upto the top and the rest of the embankment
is constructed as usual. Marston recommended the use of hay, straw,
cornstalks etc. to be filled in the trench, in order to’ increase the
compressibility of this prism of soil and thus decrease the load on
the conduit. This method of construction was used in Atlanta, Georgia,
where the initial embtankment of 35 ft. above a sewer constructed
in 1937 was proposed to be raised to about 96 feet in 1955. TheCONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS us
H
OF BE
at.
8g
VALUES OF
° ' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
VALUES OF COEFFICIENT Cn
FIG. 5.16. CURVES FOR DETERMINATION OF Cy,
sewer was protected from the increased load, by excavating a trench
to a depth of 15 ft. below the natural ground, directly over the
. Pipe. The trench was refilled with loose soil in which three 1ft layers
of tree leaves and pine straw were incorporated at approximately
¢ FINAL LEVEL op
FIG. 5.17. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPERFECT DITCH CONDUIT116 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
5 ft. intervals. Then as the embankment was constructed, shallow
trenches were excavated over the sewer in each 15 ft. lift of the
compact fill. The depth of trench was about one half of the lift
in which it was excavated. Then the trench was refilled with loose,
uncompacted soil.
Marston gave the following formula for load on such conduits
We = Cn. y Be (5.10)
The values of C,, in this case may also be obtained from curves
for Fig. 5.16 for negative projecting conduits, taking B. = By on
the assumption that the trench in fill is not wider than the pipe.
Loads on conduits in tunnel condition (Fig. 5.10 ). Marston’s
formula used for the tunnel condition is given ‘by
W, = C, By (yBr — 2c) (5.11)
where W,= load the pipe or tunnel support (kg/m)
y = unit weight of soil above the tunnel (kg/m’)
B; = maximum width of tunnel excavation (m)
C,=load coefficient which is a function of the ratio
(H/B,) of the distance from the ground surface to the top of the
tunnel to the maximum width of the tunnel excavation and of the
coefficient of internal friction of the material of the tunnel.
When the coefficient of cohesion (c) is zero, Eq. 5.11 reduces
to Eq. 5.4 applicable for trench condition. The recommended values
of coefficient of cohesion (c) for various type of solid are given
in Table 5.3.
TABLE 5.3. RECOMMENDED VALUES OF COEFFICIENT OF
COHESION (¢)
kg/m’
Soft clay
Medium clay
Hard clay
Loose dry sand
Silty sand
Dense sand
Saturated _top_soil
‘The value of load coefficient C; for various values of H/B; and
different soil conditions may be obtained from curves of Fig. 5.18.
5.7, SUPERIMPOSED LOADS ON CONDUITS
Two types of super-imposed loads may act on conduits :
() Concentrated load (p) (i) Uniformly distributed load of
intensity p over [Link] of width N and length M.CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 117
VALUES OF H/By
VALUES OF COEFFICIENT Cr
G, FOR Ky AND Ky’ = 0.1924 MIN, FOR GRANULAR MATERIALS
: G FOR Ky AND ky’ = 0.165 MAX. FOR SAND AND GRAVEL
Gr FOR Kx AND ku’ = 0.150 MAX. FOR SATURATED TOP SQIL
: G FOR Kv AND kw’ =0.130 MAX. FOR ORDINARY SOIL
Cr FOR Ky AND Ky’ = 0.110 MAX. FOR SATURATED CLAY
FIG. 5.18. VALUES OF COEFFICIENT C;.
(@) Concentrated load (P). The load on conduit is given by
Wee = C,, Pe wa(5.12)
Le
where W,-= load on the conduit (kg/m)
P=concentrated load acting on the surface (kg)
J. = impact factor, the value of which. may be taken as 1.0
for air field runways, 1.5 for highway traffic and air filled
taxiways and 1.75 for railway traffic.
C, =load coefficient, which is a function of B-/2H and L./2H.
The values of C, may be taken from Table 5.4.
eaocgee118 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
H=depth of top conduit below the surface (m)
B.= out side width of conduit (m)
L-= effective length of conduit to which the load is transmitted.
It is taken equal to the actual length of a precast segment
section of pipe if less than 1 m, and equal to 1 m is
the precast length is more than 1 m.
(6) Uniformly distributed load. Let the surface load be uniformly
distributed with an intensity p (kg/m’) acting over a rectangular area
of length M (measured parallel to the conduit) and width N (measured
transverse to M), vertically centred over the conduit. The load on
the conduit is given by
Wr = Csp «Bele ww (5.13)
where W.a = load on conduit (kg/m)
p =intensity of U.D.L. (kg/m’)
I. = impact factor.
B. = outside width of conduit
C, = load coefficient, which is a function of N/2H
and M/2H, the values of which may be obtai-
ned from Table 5.4.
H = height of surface over the top of the conduit.
Conduits under highways. For class AA loading of IRC, in the
critical case of wheel load of 6.25 tonnes, the intensity of distributed
load with wheel area of 300mm x 150 mm is given by
P= pas = 13899 /m"
Conduits under railway track. The load on conduits under railway
track is given by
W=4C,UB w(5.14)
whcre U = uniformly distributed load, (t/m*) from the surface
directly over the conduit and its value is given by
Pile, Wi
U 4AB ote 2A w(5.15)
where P =axle load in tonnes (22.5t for broad gauge)
J. = impact factor (= 1.75 for railroad)
2A = lengthof the sleeper (= 2.7m for broad gauge)
2 B = distance between the two axles (= 1.84 m for broad gauge)
W, = weight of track structure (= 0.3 t/m for broad gauge)
C, = Load coefficient which depends on the height of top
of sleeper from the top of conduit
B, = width of conduit (m)
For broad gauge track, Eq. 5.14 reduces to
W = 32.14C,.B (5.16)19
CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS
9560 | 0660
9680
9160
0
Pare | oo |
80
0080
1980
[ee |
| vaso | 9vso |
svso | l1s0
66r0 | L9v0
Tero | tivo
ego | oreo
wzo | vLz0
zovo | osto
foro | L600
42 LNAIOIAIAOD VOT 40 SAN IVA
ws WiavL120 WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
5.8. SAFE SUPPORTING STRENGTH AND BEDDING
CONDITIONS
The magnitude of the supporting strength of a conduit depends
upon the following : (i) Distribution of vertical load (i) Bedding
reaction (ii) Lateral pressure acting on the side of the conduit (iv)
~ Inherent strength of conduit.
The inherent strength of a rigid conduit is usually expressed
in terms of three edge bearing test conducted in the laboratory, using
a suitable load factor. Load factor is defined as the ratio of the
strength of pipe under any stated conditions of loading and bedding, to
its strength measured by the three edge bearing test. It should be
carefully noted that load factor does not contain a factor of safety.
The field supporting strength of a rigid conduit is the maximum
load per unit length which the conduit will support while retaining
complete serviceability. It is evidently equal to the three-edge bearing
strength (measured in the laboratory) multiplied by the load factor.
The safe supporting strength (i.e. maximum allowable field load)
is evidently equal to the field supporting strength divided by a
suitable factor of safety :
é * = Field suppo! rting strength
.. Safe supporting strength Factor of safely
_ Load factor x three edge bearing strength
~ Factor of safety
Hence, Required three-edge -bearing strength
— Max. allowable field load x Factor of safety
~ Load factor
A. factor of safely of atleast 1.5 should be applied. The load
factor depends upon the type of bedding specified for various conditions
of conduit installations, along with their recommended bedding con-
ditions described’ below.
(a) Conduits in trench conditions. Fig. 5.19 shows four classes,
A, B, C and D of bedding most often used for pipes in trenches.
In class A bedding, either a concrete cradle is used or a concrete
arch is used, both being made of plain cement concrete; however
the concrete cradle, and concrete arch can be reinforced. Class B
“bedding has either a shaped bottom. or compacted granular bedding,
with a carefully compacted backfill. Class C consists of either an
ordinary bedding having a shaped bottom (which is not recommended)
or compacted granular bedding, but with a lightly compacted backfill.
Lastly, Class D bedding consists of a flat bottom trench with no
care being taken to secure compaction of backfill at the sides and im-
mediately over the pipe and hence is not recommended. Class B or
C bedding with compacted granular bedding is generally recommended.CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS 121
a. E ©-250,¥0em win
oe. . ae EA
Sree Gh tancruu Shanice (/ Kip ramon
Z 0-25 Be MIN. 2am be CONCRETE.
o2a.t Y 0,t0cm Min. |S Se
> :
CONCRETE CRADLE CONCRETE ARCH
(i) CLass a
a
soem 4
caneruLy’
Compacteo
BACKAILL
0-258, mint
=
an COMPACTED GRANULAR BEDDING
SHAPED BOTTOM WITH TEMPED BACKFILL
(i) class B
GRANULAR BEDDING
SHAPED BOTTOM (NOT RECOMMENDED) '-
(ii) CLASS ¢
Fe BACKFIL
FLAT BOTTOM IMPERMISSIBLE BEDDING (NOT RECOMMENDED)
(iv cLass D
FIG. 5.19. CLASSES OF BEDDING FOR CONDUITS IN TRENCH
Table 5.5:gives the load factors for the above classes of bedding.
(6) Conduits in embankment conditions. The soil pressure against
the sides of a pipe placed in an embankment may be significant
in resisting the vertical load on the. structure. Fig. 5.20 shows class
A, Class B, class C and class D type beddings which are generally
adopted for projecting conduits laid under the embankment conditions
of installation. In class A type bedding, the conduit is laid on a
mat of concrete. In class B type bedding, the conduit is laid on
an accurately shaped earth to fit the bottom of the pipe and the