Structural Analysis EXAMPLE
Structural Analysis EXAMPLE
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
The addition of a green roof to the SLCC imposes additional gravity loads on the structure. The conclusion to
include an extensive green roof imposes a minimum superimposed dead load of 25 pounds per square foot
(DC Greenworks). This section evaluates the current roof deck and support system’s capacity to carry this
additional gravity load.
38
8.2. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
Design roof loads are determined using the structural cover sheet of the SLCC Construction Documents and
Table C3-1 from ASCE 7-05. The corrected snow load for the roof level is derived from the contract
documents. The additional extensive green roof dead load is given by DC Greenworks. These loads are
combined to determine the total dead load for each roof design. Dead and live loads were added together to
determine total gravity loads. See Table 8.1 for each of these loads.
TOTAL PSF
Original Roof Design 35.5
Green Roof Design 60.5
Several members are checked for their capacity to carry the new green roof loads with hand calculations.
These calculations find the maximum shear force, maximum moment, maximum allowable deflection,
moment of inertia, and plastic section modulus. The results are then compared to the W-shape beam
properties in AISC Steel Manual Table 3-6. Open-web steel joists are evaluated based on their capacity to
carry maximum and total and live shear loads according to Steel Joist Institute Standard Load Tables.
Girders are checked by their maximum shear force, maximum moment force, and plastic section modulus.
See the sample calculations below for an example of this process.
A RAM Steel Model of the roof structure and top tier of columns include input based on the loads in Table 8.1
and physical dimensions of the actual building. The program computes loads for all joists, girders and
columns and produces an output report suggesting sizes for these members.
39
8.2.1. STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS
8.2.2. ASSUMPTIONS:
• Member connections are sized based on designed capacity of members and future loads.
• If all members are sufficiently sized for the roof structure and its supporting columns, the
supporting columns and caissons are also able to support the additional green roof load.
40
8.2.3. FREE BODY DIAGRAMS
The figures below depict the typical load patterns for the structural elements analyzed in this thesis
with hand calculations. Figure 8.2 shows the plans for the two typical bays, Figure 8.3 is a free body
diagram of the loading pattern of a typical girder, and Figure 8.4 presents the loading pattern for a
typical joist.
41
8.3. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Δtotal = ( 5 w l 4 ) ⁄ ( 384 E Ix )
= ( 5 (0.3575)(30) 4(12) 3) ⁄ ( 384 (29000) Ix )
= 224.67 in5 ⁄ Ix
42
Check: Δlive = 135.12in5 / 156in4
= 0.86 in ≤ 1.0 in OK
Vmax = ∑ Ri ⁄ 2
= (4.01+6.02)(3) ⁄ 2
Vmax = 15.04 kips + 0.5*Self Weight
Zx ≥ Mmax ⁄ Fy
≥ (100.28)(12) ⁄ 50
Zx ≥ 24.07 in3
43
8.4. EXISTING STRUCTURE EVALUATION
The results of the hand calculations in Table 8.2 and Table 8.3 indicate that the selected typical members
have the capacity to carry the additional gravity load of the green roof.
1
Joist/Beam Selections for Typical Bays
Member Actual
Bay Roof Type Comments
Selection 2 Member
Original 20K4 24K6 3 rows bridging
Typical Bay No. 1
Green 20K4 24K6 Original Design OK
Original W12x19 W21x44
Typical Bay No. 2
Green W12x22 W21x44 Original Design OK
1
N.B. Span = 30 ft, 24" deep structural plenum.
2
Assume L/240 Max. Deflection
Table 8.2: Joist and beam selections for original, green roofs.
Member Actual
Bay Roof Type Comments
Selection Member
Original W12x16 W18x40
Typical Bay No. 1
Green W12x19 W18x40 Original Design OK
Original W12x16 W24x84
Typical Bay No. 2
Green W12x19 W24x84 Original Design OK
1
N.B. Span = 20 ft, 24" deep structural plenum.
44
A model of the roof structure and supporting columns for one floor height below the roof was
produced in RAM Steel (Figure 8.5, Figure 8.6). Both the original and green roof loading cases were
analyzed and all beams, joists, girders, and columns are found to be sufficient to carry both load
cases. A full check of each member can be found in Appendix B and shows that every roof structure
member is sufficient for the supplemental green roof load.
8.5. CONCLUSION
The results of this structural analysis show that the originally designed structure should be capable of
carrying the additional 25psf load of an extensive green roof. The structure is significantly oversized for the
expected load cases. This is likely the product of using standard member sizes (e.g. W24 beams and K6
joists), safety factors, and allowances for future loads. Therefore, no changes to the structure are necessary
for the proposed green roof.
45