Scribd
Upload
65 views

CIVN4002 Test Memo

1) The document analyzes vibration in a machine system. It finds that the running frequency is very close to the natural frequency, causing resonance and serious vibration. 2) It evaluates ways to reduce vibration, such as increasing the beam stiffness with a fixed-fixed support or adding a dynamic vibration absorber. 3) Additional analysis is provided of a two degree of freedom system, finding the natural frequencies and mode shapes. The theoretical and computed natural frequencies are close, with a small percent error.

Uploaded by

Lesego Matojane
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
65 views

CIVN4002 Test Memo

1) The document analyzes vibration in a machine system. It finds that the running frequency is very close to the natural frequency, causing resonance and serious vibration. 2) It evaluates ways to reduce vibration, such as increasing the beam stiffness with a fixed-fixed support or adding a dynamic vibration absorber. 3) Additional analysis is provided of a two degree of freedom system, finding the natural frequencies and mode shapes. The theoretical and computed natural frequencies are close, with a small percent error.

Uploaded by

Lesego Matojane
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

CIVN4002 Test memo-2012

Q1: 1)

Dynamic coefficient:

1 1 1
    95.92
1 r 2
 57 .1
1  ( )2 1  ( )2
 57.4

P0
[ y (t )]max  yst  
k
𝐺+𝛽𝑃0 3 (35+95.92×10)×1000×43
𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑙 =
48𝐸𝐼 48×2.1×105 ×106 ×7480×104 ×10−12

=84.39×10−3 m=84.39mm

It is clear that the running frequency of the machine is very close to


the natural frequency of the system. The serious vibration is resulted
from resonance.

2)

Solve this one degree static indeterminacy


Find out the deflection at the mid-span (where the machine is):

1 1 𝐿 5𝐿 2 5𝐿 1 6𝐿 6𝐿 2 6𝐿 1 5𝐿 5𝐿 2
δ= ( × × × × + × × × × + × × × ×
𝐸𝐼 2 2 32 3 32 2 22 32 3 32 2 32 22 3
5𝐿 7𝐿3
)=
32 768𝐸𝐼

Therefore, the natural frequency of the new system is:


7GL3
 st 
k 1 g g 768EI
   
m m W  st

768EIg 768  2.1  10 5 N / mm 2  7480  10 4 mm 4  9.8  1000mm / s


   86.83S 1
7GL3
7  35  1000 N  (4  1000mm) 3

1 1 1
 new     1.762
1 r 2
 57. 1
1  ( )2 1  ( )2
 86.83

𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝐺+𝛽𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑃0 3 (35+1.762×10)×1000×43


𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑙 = =4.47×
48𝐸𝐼 48×2.1×105 ×106 ×7480×104 ×10−12
10−3 𝑚=4.5mm

It can be seen that the improvement is significant.

3)
a) Further increase the stiffness of the beam, for example, fixed-fixed
supports,….

b) Dynamic vibration absorber

Q2:

 2m 0   7k  2k 
M   K
 0 m   2k 2k 

Characteristic Equation:
 2 2m 0   7k  2k  
det    0 m   2k 2k   0
    

2 4 m 2  11km 2  10k 2  0

11  41 k 11  41 k
12  , 22 
4 m 4 m

k k
1  1.1492 2  4.3508
m m
Mode shape corresponding to the first natural frequency

 x1   1 
   A1 sin 1t
 x2  2.35

2.35
Mode shape corresponding to the second natural frequency
 x1   1 
   A2 sin 2t
 x2   0.85

-0.85

1
Q3:

2𝑚 0 0
M=[ 0 2𝑚 0]
0 0 𝑚

12𝐸𝐼
𝑘=
ℎ3
K1=3k; k2=3k, k3=2k
6𝑘 −3𝑘 0
K[−3𝑘 5𝑘 −2𝑘]
0 −2𝑘 2𝑘
1
Assume X1={1.5}
2

4.25𝑘 𝑘
=10.5𝑚 = 0.405 𝑚

𝑘
(𝜔12 =0.3927𝑚, theoretical,error:+3.1%)

You might also like