0% found this document useful (0 votes)
390 views6 pages

Balkan Mathematical Olympiad 20 - Several Authors PDF

The document summarizes problems and solutions from the 31st Balkan Mathematical Olympiad held in 2014 in Pleven, Bulgaria. It includes 4 problems addressing topics such as determining when certain inequalities hold for positive real numbers, proving that there are infinitely many "special numbers" as defined, proving two lines from a geometry problem are perpendicular, and calculating the number of regular hexagons that can be formed from dividing a larger hexagon into triangles.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
390 views6 pages

Balkan Mathematical Olympiad 20 - Several Authors PDF

The document summarizes problems and solutions from the 31st Balkan Mathematical Olympiad held in 2014 in Pleven, Bulgaria. It includes 4 problems addressing topics such as determining when certain inequalities hold for positive real numbers, proving that there are infinitely many "special numbers" as defined, proving two lines from a geometry problem are perpendicular, and calculating the number of regular hexagons that can be formed from dividing a larger hexagon into triangles.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Balkan Mathematical

Olympiad 2014
Problems and Solutions
31st Balkan
Mathematical Olympiad
May 2-7 2014
Pleven
Bulgaria

Problems and Solutions


Problem 1. Let x, y and z be positive real numbers such that xy + yz + zx = 3xyz.
Prove that
x2 y + y 2 z + z 2 x ≥ 2(x + y + z) − 3

and determine when equality holds.

1 1 1
Solution. The given condition can be rearranged to + + = 3. Using this, we obtain:
x y z
1 1 1
x2 y + y 2 z + z 2 x − 2(x + y + z) + 3 = x2 y − 2x + + y 2 z − 2y + + z 2 x − 2x + =
y z x
 2  2  2
1 1 1
= y x− +z y− +x z− ≥0
y z z

Equality holds if and only if we have xy = yz = zx = 1, or, in other words, x = y = z = 1.

1 1 1
Alternative solution. It follows from + + = 3 and Cauchy-Schwarz inequality
x y z
that
 
2 2 2 1 1 1
3(x y + y z + z x) = + + (x2 y + y 2 z + z 2 x)
x y z
2 2 2 !
√ √
  
1 1 1 √
= √ + √ + √ ((x y)2 ) + (y z)2 + (z x)2 )
y z x

≥ (x + y + z)2 .

(x + y + z)2
Therefore, x2 y + y 2z + z 2 x ≥ and if x + y + z = t it suffices to show that
3
t2
≥ 2t − 3. The latter is equivalent to (t − 3)2 ≥ 0. Equality holds when
3
√ √ √ √ √ √
x y y = y z z = z x x,

i.e. xy = yz = zx and t = x + y + z = 3. Hence, x = y = z = 1.

Comment. The inequality is true with the condition xy + yz + zx ≤ 3xyz.


Problem 2. A special number is a positive integer n for which there exist positive integers
a, b, c and d with
a3 + 2b3
n= .
c3 + 2d3
Prove that:

(a) there are infinitely many special numbers;

(b) 2014 is not a special number.

Solution. (a) Every perfect cube k 3 of a positive integer is special because we can write

a3 + 2b3 (ka)3 + 2(kb)3


k3 = k3 =
a3 + 2b3 a3 + 2b3

for some positive integers a, b.


(b) Observe that 2014 = 2.19.53. If 2014 is special, then we have,

x3 + 2y 3 = 2014(u3 + 2v 3 ) (1)

for some positive integers x, y, u, v. We may assume that x3 + 2y 3 is minimal with


this property. Now, we will use the fact that if 19 divides x3 + 2y 3, then it divides
both x and y. Indeed, if 19 does not divide x, then it does not divide y too. The
relation x3 ≡ −2y 3 (mod 19) implies (x3 )6 ≡ (−2y 3 )6 (mod 19). The latter congruence
is equivalent to x18 ≡ 26 y 18 (mod 19). Now, according to the Fermat’s Little Theorem,
we obtain 1 ≡ 26 (mod 19), that is 19 divides 63, not possible.
It follows x = 19x1 , y = 19y1 , for some positive integers x1 and y1 . Replacing in (1) we
get
192 (x31 + 2y13) = 2.53(u3 + 2v 3 ) (2)

i.e. 19|u3 + 2v 3 . It follows u = 19u1 and v = 19v1 , and replacing in (2) we get

x31 + 2y13 = 2014(u31 + 2v13 ).


Clearly, x31 + 2y13 < x3 + 2y 3 , contradicting the minimality of x3 + 2y 3.

Problem 3. Let ABCD be a trapezium inscribed in a circle Γ with diameter AB. Let
E be the intersection point of the diagonals AC and BD. The circle with center B and
radius BE meets Γ at the points K and L, where K is on the same side of AB as C. The
line perpendicular to BD at E intersects CD at M.
Prove that KM is perpendicular to DL.

Solution. Since AB k CD, we have that ABCD is isosceles trapezium. Let O be the
center of k and EM meets AB at point Q. Then, from the right angled triangle BEQ, we
have BE 2 = BO.BQ. Since BE = BK, we get BK 2 = BO.BQ (1). Suppose that KL
meets AB at P . Then, from the right angled triangle BAK, we have BK 2 = BP.BA (2)

K
D
b b
b

b
C
M
E b

b b b b b

A Q O P B

BP BO 1
From (1) and (2) we get= = , and therefore P is the midpoint of BQ (3).
BQ BA 2
However, DM k AQ and MQ k AD (both are perpendicular to DB). Hence, AQMD
is parallelogram and thus MQ = AD = BC. We conclude that QBCM is isosceles
trapezium. It follows from (3) that KL is the perpendicular bisector of BQ and CM,
that is, M is symmetric to C with respect to KL. Finally, we get that M is the orthocenter
of the triangle DLK by using the well-known result that the reflection of the orthocenter
of a triangle to every side belongs to the circumcircle of the triangle and vise versa.

Problem 4. Let n be a positive integer. A regular hexagon with side length n is divided
into equilateral triangles with side length 1 by lines parallel to its sides.
Find the number of regular hexagons all of whose vertices are among the vertices of the
equilateral triangles.

Solution. By a lattice hexagon we will mean a regular hexagon whose sides run along edges
of the lattice. Given any regular hexagon H, we construct a lattice hexagon whose edges
pass through the vertices of H, as shown in the figure, which we will call the enveloping
lattice hexagon of H. Given a lattice hexagon G of side length m, the number of regular
hexagons whose enveloping lattice hexagon is G is exactly m.

b b b b b

Yet also there are precisely 3(n−m)(n−m+1)+1 lat- b b

b b b b b

tice hexagons of side length m in our lattice: they are


b b b

those with centres lying at most n − m steps from the b b b

b b b

centre of the lattice. In particular, the total number


b b

of regular hexagons equals b b b

b b b b b

n
X n
X n
X n
X
2 2
N= (3(n − m)(n − m + 1) + 1)m = (3n + 3n) m − 3(2m + 1) m +3 m3 .
m=1 m=1 m=1 m=1

n n n  2
X n(n + 1) X 2 n(n + 1)(2n + 1) X
3 n(n + 1)
Since m = , m = and m = it is
m=1
2 m=1
6 m=1
2
 2
n(n + 1)
easily checked that N = .
2

You might also like