Analysis and Examples: Gravity
Analysis and Examples: Gravity
Reading:
Today: p39-64
Next Lecture: p65-75
6.00
0 0.5 0 0 OK 5.00
1 0.5 0 0 OK 4.00
2 0.5 7 9 OK 3.00
3 0.5 6 10 OK 2.00
4 0.5 5.5 9.5 OK
1.00
5 0.5 5 9 OK
0.00
6 0.5 4.7 8 OK
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
7 0.5 4.5 7 OK
distance (km )
8 0.5 4.4 6 OK
9 0.5 4.3 5.5 OK
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
10 0.5 0 0 OK
0
11 0.5 0 0 OK
12 0.5 0 0 OK 2
13 0.5 0 0 OK
14 0.5 0 0 OK 4
depth (km)
15 0.5 0 0 OK
16 0.5 0 0 OK 6
17 1 1 2 OK
18 0.5 0 0 OK 8
19 0.5 0 0 OK
20 0.5 0 0 OK 10
12
1
Ambiguity - I
Ambiguity - II
4πGR 3 ∆ρ 1
∆g z =
3z 2 [ (
1+ x z2
2
)]
32
2
Gravity Anomalies: 2D forward calculation
for rectangular parallelepipeds with greater vertical extent than horizontal
Gravity anom aly
Spreadsheet:
see Dobrin and Grav2Dcolumn
Savit eq 12-34
2.50
Define density structure Pro file 1
2.00 Pro file 2
Profile 1 Profile2
dgz (mGal)
1.50
Adjust bold numbers… Adjust bold numbers…
coulum density density
1.00
center contrast top bottom error contrast bottom error
(km) (g/cm3) (km) (km) check (g/cm3) top (km) (km) check
0.50
0 0.3 0 0 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
0.00
1 0.3 4 4.4 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
2 0.3 4 4.4 OK 0.9 0 0 OK distance (km )
3 0.3 4 4.3 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
4 0.3 4 4.3 OK 0.9 0 0 OK 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
5 0.3 4 4.4 OK 0.9 0 0 OK 0
6 0.3 4 4.4 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
2
7 0.3 4 4.5 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
8 0.3 4 4.6 OK 0.9 0 0 OK 4
depth (km)
9 0.3 4 4.7 OK 0.9 0 0 OK 6
10 0.3 4 4.8 OK 0.9 8 12 OK
8
11 0.3 4 4.7 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
12 0.3 4 4.6 OK 0.9 0 0 OK 10
13 0.3 4 4.5 OK 0.9 0 0 OK 12 Profile 1
14 0.3 4 4.4 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
14
15 0.3 4 4.4 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
16 0.3 4 4.3 OK 0.9 0 0 OK 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
0
17 0.3 4 4.3 OK 0.9 0 0 OK
18 0.3 4 4.4 OK 0.9 0 0 OK 2
10
12 Profile 2
14
Enhance the
anomalies of interest
3
Regional trend removal
Small geological features near the surface
cause small wavelength anomalies.
Large scale structures at greater depth cause
longer wavelength anomalies.
4
Regional trend removed
Removing noise
Noise sources
• instrument inaccuracies
• drift corrections
• site surveying
(correction errors)
Î Low-pass filter
5
Removing noise
Noise removed
6
Wavelength filtering
We have just applied two filters to our data:
1. Regional trend removal: high-pass filter
2. Noise filter: low-pass filter
Î
Band-pass
filter
Wavelength filtering
Spatial domain
Subtracting averages
1. at each data point draw a circle
2. average the gravity observations
around circumference
3. subtract mean from value at center
point
Î Recovers anomalies with a
wavelength close to the diameter
of the circle
7
Wavelength filtering
Wave number domain
1. Fourier transform the data: f(x,y) Î F(kx,ky)
2. set high and low wavelengths to zero: F’(kx,ky)
3. Fourier transform back: F’(kx,ky) Î f’(x,y)
F’
Continuation filters
This project the potential field to either higher or lower elevations
• Upward continuation – enhances deeper sources
• Downward continuation – enhances shallow sources
Derivative filters
• Enhance shallow anomalies
• Used to find edges of anomalies
For shallow bodies with vertical edges
the max horizontal gradient will occur
over the edge
8
Methodology of interpretation
General approach
1. Compile data along profiles or as a map
This includes applying all corrections for surface variations
2. Apply isolation and enhancement techniques i.e. filters
Identify residuals of interest, source shape outlines
3. Apply approximate interpretation techniques
Use simple shape formula to estimate size and depth of sources
4. Use forward techniques to determine source parameters
Application of forward approaches ensures the postulated
structure makes geological sense
5. Apply inverse techniques to determine source parameters
Translate results into meaningful geologic model
Methodology of interpretation
Forward modeling
1. Make a skilled guess of the structure (the model)
2. Calculate the anomaly this would produce
3. Compare to the observations (the data)
4. Adjust the model and recalculate etc…
Each iteration could be done by hand, automated, or a combination (best)
9
Gravity Anomalies: 2D forward calculation
for rectangular parallelepipeds with greater vertical extent than horizontal
Gravity anom aly
Spreadsheet:
see Dobrin and Grav2Dcolumn
Savit eq 12-34
0.00
Define density structure 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Profile 1
-0.50 Profile 2
Profile 1 Profile2
dgz (mGal)
Adjust bold numbers… Adjust bold numbers… -1.00
coulum density density
center contrast top bottom error contrast bottom error -1.50
(km) (g/cm3) (km) (km) check (g/cm3) top (km) (km) check
-2.00
0 -0.3 0 0 OK 0 0 0 OK
1 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK
-2.50
2 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK distance (km )
3 -0.3 4 4.3 OK 0 0 0 OK
4 -0.3 4 4.3 OK 0 0 0 OK 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
5 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK 0
6 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK
2
7 -0.3 4 4.5 OK 0 0 0 OK
8 -0.3 4 4.6 OK 0 0 0 OK 4
depth (km)
9 -0.3 4 4.7 OK 0 0 0 OK 6
10 -0.3 4 4.8 OK -0.9 8 12 OK
8
11 -0.3 4 4.7 OK 0 0 0 OK
12 -0.3 4 4.6 OK 0 0 0 OK 10
13 -0.3 4 4.5 OK 0 0 0 OK 12 Profile 1
14 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK
14
15 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK
16 -0.3 4 4.3 OK 0 0 0 OK
17 -0.3 4 4.3 OK 0 0 0 OK
18 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK
19 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK
20 -0.3 0 0 OK 0 0 0 OK
Profile 1 Profile2
dgz (mGal)
9 -0.3 4 4.7 OK 0 0 0 OK 6
10 -0.3 4 4.8 OK -0.9 8 12 OK
8
11 -0.3 4 4.7 OK 0 0 0 OK
12 -0.3 4 4.6 OK 0 0 0 OK 10
13 -0.3 4 4.5 OK 0 0 0 OK 12 Profile 1
14 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK
14
15 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK
16 -0.3 4 4.3 OK 0 0 0 OK 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
0
17 -0.3 4 4.3 OK 0 0 0 OK
18 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK 2
19 -0.3 4 4.4 OK 0 0 0 OK 4
20 -0.3 0 0 OK 0 0 0 OK
depth (km)
10
12 Profile 2
14
10
Methodology of interpretation
Inverse modeling
Forward modeling:
• Make a skilled guess of the structure (the model)
• Calculate the anomaly this would produce
• Compare to the observations (the data)
• Adjust the model and recalculate etc…
Examples
Salt dome
Anomaly:
• Near circular
• ∆gmax ~ 16 mGal
• x1/2 ~ 3700 m
11
Examples
Salt dome – seismic line
From gravity, assuming spherical salt body:
• Depth to center ~ 4800 m
• Radius ~ 3800 m
• Top of salt at ~ 1000 m
Examples
Salt dome – density contrasts
12
Examples
Fault location
Gravity is very sensitive to vertical geologic contacts
The vertical
gradient is
particularly
sensitive to
“edges”
Examples
Fault location
Identifying fault locations is the
first step in hazard mitigation.
13
Examples
Mapping basin depth
Examples
Mapping basin depth
Thicker sediments:
More susceptible to
subsidence with the
removal of water
14