Minimizing Excessive PDF
Minimizing Excessive PDF
s
Minimizing Excessive
Sound in Ventilation
System Design
Application Guide
125-1929 Rev. 4, June, 2009
NOTICE
Document information is subject to change without notice by Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. Companies, names, and various
data used in examples are fictitious unless otherwise noted. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose, without the express written permission of Siemens Building
Technologies, Inc.
All software described in this document is furnished under a license agreement and may be used or copied only in accordance with
license terms.
For further information, contact your nearest Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. representative.
TO THE READER
Your feedback is important to us. If you have comments about this manual, please submit them to:
[email protected]
CREDITS
APOGEE is a trademark of Siemens Building Technologies, Inc.
Other product or company names mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.
Printed in U.S.A.
Chapter 1–Introduction 1
Glossary 111
Index 115
It also provides information on how to access help and where to direct comments about this
guide.
• Chapter 2, Physics of Sound, discusses the properties of sound and how sound is
measured. It includes sound wave propagation and parameters; measurement
parameters; NC and RC curves; and how to determine an RC rating.
• Chapter 5, HVAC System Sound Analysis, provides examples of how to analyze the
components of a specific HVAC system.
• The Appendix contains blank copies of certain graphs and forms that appear in this
document. They are intended to be copied and used for sound measurement and
analysis.
• The Glossary describes the terms and acronyms used in this manual.
• The Index helps you locate information presented in this application guide.
• Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association Inc. (SMACNA):
− Methods for Calculating Fan Sound Ratings from Laboratory Test Data AMCA
301-90
− Procedure for Estimating Occupied Space Sound Levels in the Application of Air
Terminals and Air Outlets (ARI 885-90)
Symbols
The following table lists the symbols used in this guide to draw your attention to important
information.
Getting Help
For more information about minimizing sound in ventilation systems, contact your local
Siemens representative.
• Background sound
• Laboratory applicability
Sound and vibration are a science in themselves and an all-inclusive study is beyond the
scope of this guide. Additionally, it is believed that the reader need not delve too deep into
the theory to achieve a practical working knowledge of the subject.
For these reasons, this guide will limit its approach to only the essential elements of
acoustics theory and will attempt to emphasize practicality rather than theory whenever
possible. For those readers who want more background on the subject or need additional
information, the Suggested Reference Materials section in the About this Application Guide
lists a number of books, and other sources of more detailed and specialized technical
information on the subject of HVAC sound and vibration.
The information in this guide should assist in handling typical ventilation system design
applications for offices, laboratories, classrooms, and the like. However, the reader is
cautioned that more specific and detailed knowledge is warranted if the system design is
intended for applications where sound is a much more critical issue. This includes acoustical
laboratories, recording studios, and any location where maintaining a very low or specific
sound level is crucial. If any of these types of applications are a part of an HVAC design
project, it is recommended that the designer consult an appropriate acoustical or sound
specialist for guidance.
Background Sound
It is important to understand that the typical goal of a properly designed ventilation system is
not to obtain the least possible amount of sound, but to achieve a specific sound level and
profile. In most applications, a specific background sound level and sound profile are
desirable since it helps cover or mask other objectionable sounds. In the workplace, a good
ventilation system provides just enough background sound to prevent other sounds
(telephone conversations, keypad clicking, copy machines, etc.) from being excessively
annoying. This desirable background sound level and profile is sometimes termed white
noise and is usually very noticeable when not present. (Recall how much louder common
office sounds seem to be if the ventilation system is shut down and the white noise is not
present.) However, there is a sound level threshold that is dependent upon the room and its
activity, and when exceeded, results in excessive and objectionable sound.
Laboratory Applicability
Of the many HVAC applications where ambient sound level is an important design
component, laboratory applications are a particular challenge to the HVAC designer, due to
the necessity for providing high room ventilation rates to ensure the health and safety of the
occupants.
• NC Curves
• RC Curves
• Determining an RC rating
As sound waves travel to the ear, they may travel not only through air but also use different
mediums as well. Recall that a basic physics classroom experiment on sound consists of
putting a sound generating device (sometimes an alarm clock) under a large glass container
(typically a bell jar). The vibrations of the sound generating device cause sound waves in the
air within the bell jar that travel outward until they reach the glass wall of the bell jar. There,
they cause the wall of the bell jar to vibrate that in turn causes sound waves to be generated
in the air outside of the bell jar. These sound waves then continue and eventually reach the
ears of those in the classroom. As long as the bell jar contains room air at normal
atmospheric pressure and density, the above scenario takes place and the sound is easily
heard.
However, after a vacuum pump removes most of the air from inside the bell jar, the sound
made by the sound generating device is dramatically reduced since the density of the air
within the bell jar has been substantially reduced and thus has a much more limited impact
on the wall of the bell jar. This experiment shows that sound waves are highly dependent
upon having an adequate medium for their transmission.
This experiment also shows another important element of sound wave transmission; that
sound waves traveling through air are not dependent upon movement of the air itself.
Although the air in the bell jar could not leave the jar, the sound traveled outward from the jar
without involving any physical movement of the air out from the inside of the bell jar.
Likewise, sound movement in a ventilation system is not dependent upon the movement or
direction of the airflow. Not only will sound generated in the supply side of a ventilation
system travel in the direction that the air happens to be moving to the areas served, but also
sound generated in an exhaust system will travel opposite the direction of airflow and also be
heard in the areas served by the exhaust system.
Figure 1 shows a diagram of the major parameters that apply to the analysis of sound. At the
left side of the diagram is the sound source shown as a solid dot. Anytime sound is produced,
there must be a sound source. When we speak, our vocal chords create sound and are the
sound source. As a sound source creates sound in the air, it radiates energy outward in the
form of compressed air waves or sound waves.
Unless there is a barrier, the sound waves continue to travel outward in all directions in a
spherical manner, until they either are absorbed by an object or their energy level is
dissipated by the surrounding air.
With regard to understanding the science of sound and its effects, it is necessary to have an
understanding of two fundamental terms: sound power and sound pressure. These terms are
not interchangeable and it is important to have a clear understanding of each term.
The intensity of the sound at the source is expressed in terms of sound power and
establishes the energy level of the sound. Sound power is the parameter that indicates the
total energy or power output of the sound. It is universally expressed in terms of watts. The
sound power spectrum that we are familiar with ranges from a high point of 10,000 (104)
watts of sound power for a jetliner takeoff or gun fire, to a low of 0.000000009 (10-9) watts for
a soft whisper.
Ultimately, sound waves, which in our context, are really compressed air waves, will
ultimately impinge on a receiver and at that point their effect is expressed in terms of the
sound pressure.
For our purposes, the most common receiver will normally be the eardrum of a person who
hears the sound. Another common example of a sound receiver is a microphone that is part
of a sound amplification system. Sound power itself, however, does not really establish
whether a sound will be interpreted as loud or soft by the receiver. That is entirely dependent
upon the amount of energy loss or attenuation of the sound waves that occurs prior to
impinging upon the receiver as sound pressure.
Attenuation, which is simply a decrease in the sound power before it gets to the listener,
occurs primarily due to two factors: distance and physical barriers. When sound is generated
in an open or unconfined space, as in Figure 1, the primary attenuation factor is the distance
between the sound source and the receiver.
When a sound source generates sound, the sound power energy is radiated outward in all
directions, as shown in Figure 1, and the sound power energy is dissipated over a rapidly
increasing area. This can be likened to an ever expanding sphere surrounding the source of
the sound. An analogy of the effect of sound power radiation would be like having a fixed
quantity of paint and the task of achieving a uniform thickness paint coating on the surface of
the sphere. In this analogy the paint quantity represents the available sound power level,
while the resulting thickness of the paint coating on the surface of the sphere represents the
sound pressure level.
As the radius of a sphere increases, the surface area also increases and the thickness of the
surface coating must be decreased. If a sphere having a radius of 1 foot (surface area 12.56
square feet) is expanded until the radius is doubled (becomes 2 feet), the surface area would
have increased to 50.24 square feet or four times the original surface area. This of course
means that the paint coating on the surface could then only be 1/4 of the previous thickness.
Likewise, each time the distance between a sound source and the receiver is doubled, the
effect at the receiver that is the sound pressure level is reduced by a factor of 4.
The sound pressure level is the most widely used parameter in the field of acoustical
engineering since it is the closest thing to what we experience in terms of loudness or
softness of a sound. In the previous analogy, the thickness of the paint coating on the
spherical surface represented the effect that a certain quantity of paint could have on the
surface of the sphere. Therefore ,sound pressure expresses the effect that the sound power
energy has when impinging upon a unit area of the receiver.
A more convenient scale is to represent sound power level so the decibel (dB) unit is used.
With decibels, sound power low level begins at 0 decibels, which is just enough power for the
human ear to begin hearing something that is right next to the ear. At the upper end of the
scale is the sound power level of a jetliner taking off, which could be 160 dB. (An explanation
of decibels and how specific physical measurements are expressed in terms of decibels
follows.)
Be sure not to confuse sound power level with sound pressure level (even though both are
expressed in terms of decibels). Remember:
• Sound power level expresses the power or energy of the sound source.
• Sound pressure level expresses the loudness or effect of the sound at the receiver.
When we hear a soft whisper, we are experiencing a sound power level of approximately
0.000000001 (10-9) watts. When we converse in a normal voice, we are experiencing a
sound power at about 0.00001 (10-5) watts. If we had the unfortunate experience to be just
below a jetliner taking off, we could later tell everyone that we experienced a sound power
level of around 10,000 (104) watts. (However, it may take us a few days before we could
again hear their reply.)
As previously discussed, wattage based direct sound measurements are non-linear and vary
over a very large range, thus it becomes clumsy to stay with watts as the basic unit of
measurement.
We could improve the situation by using a direct comparison or ratio between the two
different sound power levels. For example, when comparing a normal voice to a whisper, we
could divide 10-5 by 10-9 that would yield 10,000. In other words, a normal voice has about
10,000 times more sound power than a whisper. This same approach would also tell us that
the sound power from a jetliner takeoff is 1,000,000,000 times more sound power than a
normal voice.
Unfortunately, these numbers are still awkward to work with because of the large number of
zeros. We can remove these zeros by using logarithms. Recall that a logarithm to the base
10 (or log for short), means that the power of 10 would be raised to become the number that
we’re concerned with. In other words, if we’re working with the number 10,000, the log is
simply 4, since 104 = 10,000. If we’re working with 1,000,000,000 the log would be 9 since
109 = 1,000,000,000.
Decibels
Using a comparison or ratio approach for large numbers tends to make it easier to relate to
the data. In addition, converting large numbers to logarithms further reduces the amount of
digits (and possible errors) when handling numbers comprised of many digits. This is where
the use of decibels offers a practical approach to quantifying sound parameters since a
decibel is based upon both a ratio and numbers converted into logarithms.
The first thing to note with regard to a decibel is that it expresses a ratio or makes a
comparison between two values; it is not a specific unit of measurement such as a watt,
pound, or even a foot of length. (Since decibels are based upon a ratio, they can be applied
to many other different scientific parameters besides sound.) Therefore, with regard to
applying decibels (dB), a reference point must be established as one component of the ratio.
With regard to sound power and sound pressure values, a bel is simply the logarithm of the
ratio of two different sound power or sound pressure levels. A decibel is 10 bels. (The reason
for using decibels instead of just staying with bels is that we do ourselves a favor by getting
rid of any decimals in the final values.) This may sound complicated and possibly somewhat
confusing, but you’ll understand it better after going through the process of establishing
decibels (dB) for the previous examples of a whisper, a normal voice, and the jetliner takeoff.
Then (hopefully) you’ll see the advantage of using dB instead of the large decimal numbers
that are required to express values in wattage.
Since we’re really only concerned with the sound that humans hear, we’ll use the threshold of
hearing as the common point of the comparison ratio. The sound power at the threshold of
-12
hearing is generally accepted as 0.000000000001 watts (10 watts), so this will always be
the reference point or one of the two parts to each sound power ratio.
The following formula will yield the decibels for any absolute value of sound power that we
compare to the threshold of hearing:
Lw = 10 x Log (W ÷ Wref)
Where:
Using this formula, let’s determine the sound power level of a whisper, which produces a very
tiny amount of sound power around 0.000000001 watts (10-9 watts). Using the above formula
this becomes:
= 10 x Log (103)
= 10 x 3
= 30 dB
Using the formula again, let’s determine the sound power level of a normal conversational
voice that is around 0.00001 watts (10-5 watts).
= 10 x Log10 (107)
= 10 x 7
= 70 dB
And, using this same formula for the jetliner takeoff sound power level of 1,000.0 watts (104
watts) becomes:
= 10 x Log10 (1016)
= 10 x 16
= 160 dB
It’s much easier having the numbers determined above (30, 70, and 160 dB) instead of
having to refer to the actual wattage values when comparing sound power levels. Note that
when we say that a whisper is 30 dB, a regular voice is 70 dB and a jetliner takeoff is 160, we
are really comparing these individual levels with respect to the threshold of hearing that is 0
dB.
Again, there are no units associated with decibels since they are a comparison between two
values, (or more scientifically, a ratio between different magnitudes). Also, decibels are used
for different parameters besides sound power level. Decibels are also used to express sound
pressure level, which is discussed below, and as we are keenly aware, is a different sound
parameter than the sound power level.
Therefore, a receiver is only exposed to a portion of the total sound power. In other words,
the effect of the sound power becomes less and less (is attenuated more and more) on the
receiver. Therefore, the sound power level and sound pressure level are different parameters
and cannot be used interchangeably. However, decibels also are used to express the ratios
of the relative sound intensity or loudness at the receiver.
The basic unit of acoustic pressure is the Pascal (Pa). (One PSI is equivalent to 6,895
Pascals.) Even though a Pascal is a very small unit of pressure measurement, the specific
values of Pascals that are encountered with sound pressure are so small and vary over such
a wide range that the “decibel” approach is applied to express sound pressure levels in a
more practical manner.
The basic formula to determine a specific sound pressure level in decibels is:
Lp = 10 x Log (P ÷ Pref)2
Where:
A person speaking in a normal voice, about three feet away from a listener, will produce a
sound pressure of around 0.02 Pa. Using this formula, let’s determine the sound pressure
level in dB that the listener would experience.
= 10 x Log (103)2
= 10 x Log (106)
= 60 dB
Therefore, the sound pressure level of normal conversation for the listener is approximately
60 dB.
To give a “feel” for the common range of values for both sound power and sound pressure,
Table 1 gives some typical values for the common levels in our environment.
Remember, even though the decibel values in Table 1 are almost the same for the sound
power level and the sound pressure level, they represent different physical parameters. In
HVAC design, we are mostly concerned with the sound pressure level experienced by an
occupant in an area served by an HVAC system.
Even though you will find that the sound power level of a sound source such as an HVAC
system supply fan may be considerably high (such as, 90 or more dB), the objective is to
design and configure the HVAC system so the sound pressure level will be attenuated down
to an acceptable level, perhaps 35 dB, when heard by an occupant of the area served by the
HVAC system.
Table 2 lists a few rules that generally predict how a person perceives loudness of sound as
changes occur in the sound pressure level.
dB Change Effect
0 to 2 None
3 Just noticeable
8 to 10 Increase Twice as loud
8 to 10 Decrease Half as loud
Figure 2 illustrates another important rule regarding sound pressure levels and distance.
Whenever the distance between a sound source and a receiver is doubled, the sound
pressure level at the receiver is reduced by 6 dB from its previous value. This is a very
important relationship. For instance, if a sound source produces a sound pressure level of 40
dB at a receiver 15 feet away, the sound pressure level would be reduced to 34 dB if the
distance away were doubled to 30 feet. (Note that this is a non-linear relationship and the
results cannot be interpolated. Therefore, in this example, it would be incorrect to assume
that the dB level drops at 2 dB for every 5 foot increase in distance.
If the distance were again doubled from 30 feet to 60 feet, the sound pressure level at 60 feet
would be 28 dB. This relationship continues each time the previous distance is doubled.
If the sound pressure level was 60 dB at a 12 foot distance between the sound source and
the receiver, what would the sound pressure level be at a distance of 100 feet? Using the
distance doubling rule, the sound pressure levels at various distances would be:
• 60 dB at 12 ft
• 54 dB at 24 ft
• 48 dB at 48 ft
• 42 dB at 96 ft
• 36 dB at 192 ft
Since 100 feet is slightly more than 96 feet, the dB level would be perhaps just a bit less than
42 dB.
Octave Bands
Sound can vary in pitch or frequency from a very low base sound to a very high pitch sound
such as a squeak. In terms of actual frequency, human hearing ranges from about 20 cycles
per second (Hz) at the low end to around 20,000 Hz at the high end. The actual frequency
span of hearing varies from person to person and tends to decline somewhat as we age with
the upper frequency end of our hearing being the portion mostly affected by age.
Previously, we discussed the terms sound power level and sound pressure level and arrived
at how their intensity was expressed in decibels. If you recall how the screen of an
oscilloscope looks when it’s monitoring the audio output of a speaker, you can visualize that
sounds are usually composed of a multitude of tones at different frequencies. To scientifically
describe a particular sound accurately, a curve should be plotted showing the sound power
level or sound pressure level in decibels with reference to the frequency.
Since the normal audible spectrum covers the frequency range of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, it
would be totally impractical to deal with each individual frequency. For this reason, it has
become customary in sound analysis to divide the overall audible spectrum into 8 frequency
bands called octave bands. (These are often referred to as 1/1 Octave Bands.) In each band
the highest frequency is twice the lowest frequency, and the mid frequency of each band is
used for identifying the octave band and as the specific frequency for expressing the sound
power level or sound pressure level in decibels.
Figure 3 illustrates how sound curves can be shown on a graph that plots the sound pressure
level at each of the standard octave band mid frequencies. The resulting curves establish
what’s referred to as a sound criterion curve for the particular sound.
Figure 3. Sound Pressure Level vs. Octave Band - Sound Criterion Curves.
With reference to Figure 3, the dB scale ascends from 0 to 90 along the vertical axis and the
center frequencies of 10 bands are along the horizontal axis. Note that the frequency scale is
not linear but increases rapidly in moving from left to right.
Note that a solid line curve in the lower left portion of the graph is labeled as the approximate
threshold of a hearing curve. This represents the dB sound pressure level that must be
present in a person’s eardrum in order for the person to hear a particular sound frequency.
Recall that in Table 1, the threshold for hearing is listed as 0 dB sound pressure level. With
reference to Figure 3, this really applies to sound frequencies above 4,000 Hz that are in the
area of the high pitched beep of a computer speaker. At the lower frequencies, the sound
pressure level must be considerable higher to be audible.
The sound pressure level of a particular sound such as a fan running, a transformer hum, or
car horn can be measured with a sound level meter at a specific distance from the sound.
The sound pressure in dB at each frequency band can be plotted on the graph and the
resulting curve will show the profile of the sound similar to the dotted line and dashed line
curves shown in Figure 3.
The dotted line curve is a predominantly lower frequency curve since it has a high dB level in
the lower frequency bands and a lower dB level in the higher frequency bands. This sound is
characterized as rumbly or somewhat like a drumming sound. The dashed line curve is just
the opposite and is characterized as a hissy type sound or somewhat like an air leak. In order
for a sound to be acceptable for sound masking (white noise) or as an acceptable
background, it must be fairly well balanced across the audible sound spectrum. Since neither
of these two sound curves are well balanced, they would not be acceptable for sound
masking and instead would probably be very annoying.
Difference between the highest and Add this dB to the highest dB of the
lowest dB of multiple sounds at a specific sounds to obtain the resultant dB at the
octave band center frequency octave band’s center frequency
0 3.0
1 2.6
2 2.1
3 1.8
4 1.5
5 1.2
6 1.0
7 0.8
8 0.6
9 0.5
10 0.4
12 0.3
14 0.2
16 0.1
For example, in Figure 3 at the 500 Hz frequency, one sound pressure level is at 24 dB and
another at 50 dB. The difference between them is 26 dB. With reference to Table 3, this is
well beyond the 16 dB difference. As a result, 0 dB is added to the higher one (50 dB) that
results in no change to the total sound pressure level.
Figure 4 shows the resulting sound pressure level when combining the two curves of Figure 3
using Table 3. Note that where the individual curves of Figure 1 are more than 16 dB apart,
the resultant always equals the higher dB value of the individual curves.
Incidentally, the resulting sound produced by the combined sound curve of Figure 4 would be
a combination of a rumble and hiss and would still be objectionable as an ambient sound.
Avoid using A-Weighted sound criterion when designing HVAC systems or conducting a
detailed analysis of the sound pressure level in a room with the intent of improving the room
ambient sound profile. Using A-Weighted values should be limited only to general noise level
comparison measurements or when involved in ensuring against exceeding permissible
occupational sound levels.
NC Curves
In an effort to come up with ambient sound pressure level curves that provide a good balance
between the sound frequency spectrum and the acceptable loudness for various room
applications, standard Noise Criterion (NC) curves have been developed. Figure 5 shows the
family of NC curves.
Until now, this document has avoided using the term noise since there is no scientific way to
define it. It is merely a term that each individual subjectively applies to a sound profile that for
them ranges from unwelcome or bothersome to very annoying. With regard to the Noise
Criterion curves, they establish balanced sound (noise) levels that are generally acceptable
for specific room applications. In other words, the sound produced by an HVAC system
serving a specific application would be acceptable by the vast majority of occupants if the
sound pressure level that it produces does not exceed the dB level of the appropriate NC
curve at any point, and it also has the same general shape as the referenced NC curve.
When analyzing a given room sound profile, it is also acceptable to visually interpolate
between the NC curves. For instance, if the highest penetration of a listed curve (NC 45 in
this case) is 52 dB at 500 Hz, then the measured sound can be stated as having an NC 48
rating.
The NC curves were developed in 1957 and are still widely used today. However, note that
they do not include any dB values for frequencies below 63 Hz. In general, the most
objectionable HVAC noise is the low frequency rumble that is produced by HVAC fans. The
bulk of this sound occurs below the 63 Hz octave band.
(See the Appendix for a copy of this graph that is suitable for reproduction.)
Figure 5. Noise Criterion Curves.
RC Curves
The Room Criterion (RC) rating is a more recent development for analyzing and rating the
sound present in a room. The RC rating should be used, whenever possible, in specific
design applications since it is superior to the NC curves for the following reasons:
1. The RC curves extend down to 16 HZ that covers the low frequency sound spectrum
more completely than the NC curves.
2. Establishing the applicable RC curve that applies to an actual sound profile is dependent
on the overall shape or profile of the actual sound curve, rather than merely the highest
penetration of the sound into the NC family of curves.
3. Since a given sound curve is likely to have a unique curvature or profile, each RC sound
curve is further annotated as to its actual characteristics:
• If an identifiable predominant tone exists in the sound (such as, clicking, whining,
whistle, etc.), a T is also added to the above suffix.
Figure 6 shows the standard family of Room Criterion curves. Table 4 lists specific
applications and the maximum acceptable sound criterion that apply when referencing these
curves. Note that the Criterion level is always the dB level of the particular RC curve as it
passes through 1,000 Hz.
Utilizing the NC curves for design purposes typically results in background sound
characteristics having a noticeable rumble or hiss. Although the dB level may be acceptable
for speaking, the overall sound profile is less likely to be as acceptable as a design that is
based upon the RC Criterion.
(See the Appendix for a copy of this graph that is suitable for reproduction.)
Figure 6. Room Criterion Curves.
Determining an RC Rating
To determine what RC rating should be applied to an existing room, follow the steps listed
below.
• If the actual curve does not depart from the reference curve throughout all octave
bands by more than 5 dB, the actual curve is considered to be neutral. The suffix N is
added to the value obtained in Step 1.
• If the actual curve is above the reference curve by more than 5 dB at any octave
frequency less than 500 Hz, the actual sound is considered to be rumbly. The suffix
R is added to the value obtained in Step 1.
• If the actual curve is above the reference curve by more than 3 dB at any octave
frequency greater than 500 Hz, the actual sound is considered to be hissy. The suffix
H is added to the value obtained in Step 1.
• If the actual sound has an identifiable predominant tone such as a clicking, whining,
whistle etc., the actual sound is considered to have a tonal character. The T suffix is
also added to the N, R, and H suffixes.
Example of RC Analysis
If an existing room has an actual measured sound profile as listed in the following chart, what
RC Criterion would apply?
The average dB at 500, 1,000, and 2,000 Hz is calculated as: (43 + 35 +30) / 3 = 36.
With respect to Figure 7, the RC reference curve is plotted as the dashed line and the actual
sound curve is plotted as a solid line. Note that the actual curve does not exceed the
reference curve by more than 5 dB below 500 Hz, nor more than 3 dB above 500 Hz. Thus,
the sound RC criterion for this particular room sound would be classified as neutral and is
summarized as: 36 (N).
Although this particular sound has a slight rumble as indicated by the rise above the
reference curve in the lower frequencies, it would still be very acceptable as an overall sound
level for applications requiring an RC 35 level.
In addition to the sound generated by the mechanical components of rotating equipment, the
air movement produced by a fan generates aerodynamic sounds due to interaction with the
distribution system components including dampers, duct fittings, junctions, terminal units, air
diffusers and inlet grilles.
Rotational equipment sound is primarily attenuated by isolating the equipment from occupied
areas of a building, incorporating physical barriers to sound waves and utilizing vibration
isolation to prevent vibrations from being transmitted through the building structure.
(Information on attenuating equipment operational sound is given in a later section.
HVAC aerodynamic sound is somewhat harder to attenuate since the ductwork provides a
direct conduit for its transmission to the conditioned spaces. In addition, some aerodynamic
sound is generated locally by HVAC system supply and exhaust components associated with
the room served by the system. On the supply side, this includes VAV box dampers, reheat
or cooling coils, air diffusers, and associated duct fittings. On the exhaust side, this primarily
involves the room exhaust terminals, laboratory fume hoods and other specialized room
exhaust units. Other sources of locally generated sound associated with HVAC systems
includes water flow through reheat coil valves, fan powered terminal units, and sometimes
even sound caused by bleeding or exhausting compressed air from the HVAC control
system.
Fans are tested for the sound power level produced by the manufacturers according to
standard tests covered by ASHRAE Standard 68-1986, and also by AMCA Standard 330-
1986. Virtually all fan manufacturers also send their fans to the AMCA laboratory for
certification of their test data. For greater accuracy of data, these tests cover the sound levels
produced in 1/3 octave bands. (Each of the eight octave bands is further divided into three
bands thus making 24 bands in all for the test. Three sound power level values are thus
obtained for each of the eight octave band. This data is then converted into the sound power
level for each of the eight octave bands and becomes the published data.)
Although fan manufacturers provide sound power level data for each of their different sizes
and types of fans, the data cannot cover each possible combination of operating conditions
(airflow, static pressure, etc.) in which a given fan may be applied. Therefore, fan sound
power level data is typically given at one set of standard operating conditions that also is a
common denominator for all fans. This consists of an airflow of 1 cfm and a static pressure of
1.00 in. WC. With this data, the fan sound power level at other operating conditions can be
determined through a calculation process that includes additional fan sound components.
Although a fan is not designed with the intention of deliberately creating sound, a sound
component, in addition to aerodynamic sound, is nonetheless generated as the result of fan
blade vibration during rotation. This component of fan sound is referred to as the blade
frequency increment (BFI). In some situations this component of the fan sound can be the
major source of annoyance. Therefore, it is a very important part of calculating the sound
power level of a fan in a given application.
Fan Efficiency
Another factor that affects the actual sound power level of a fan is its operating efficiency.
The closer a fan operates to its peak efficiency conditions, the lower the aerodynamic sound
that will be produced.
However, since designers typically don’t want to design a system around one specific fan
manufacturer, they can use the sound power level data for typical fans that ASHRAE has
published. Table 5 reproduces this data for your convenience.
Table 5. Typical Sound Power Levels of Various Fans at 1 cfm and 1.00 in. WC.
In Table 5, the sound power levels listed are quite low with respect to those listed in Table 1
for sources of sound. However, the values in Table 5 are only a starting point. They only
cover fan operation at 1 cfm and 1.00 inches water static pressure (wsp). Since no fan would
ever be applied under this set of conditions, we must calculate the expected sound power
level at our actual design conditions.
However, just looking at this table tells us something about which fans tend to produce less
sound than others. For instance, centrifugal fans are quieter than axial fans, and the top
group of centrifugal fans has the lowest sound power level. Radial type centrifugal fans
produce the most sound and really are really intended for industrial applications and not
HVAC.
Note that the BFI column refers to the blade frequency increment component of the sound
power level. The lower the number, the lower this sound component will be. Also, the fewer
the number of blades the fan has, the lower the frequency of the sound.
Where:
When the frequency is determined, refer to Table 6 to determine the octave band to which
this frequency applies. The BFI dB value from the manufacturer (or from Table 5) is then
added to the dB obtained in Step 1 for this particular octave band.
Table 6. Octave Band Frequency Division.
(Octave band is listed above the applicable frequency range)
When the actual operational efficiency is an unknown (as is typically the situation in the
design stage), determine where the fan will be operating on its fan curve. Figure 8 shows a
typical centrifugal and axial fan curve and the required dB correction for various operational
regions.
For details, see Example Fan Sound Power Level Calculation in this section.
Figure 8. Fan Sound Power Level Correction for Off-Peak Efficiency Operation.
Determine the actual sound power level to be expected under those conditions assuming the
actual manufacturer’s data is the same as Table 5.
= 10 (4.2) + 20 (0.6)
= 42 + 12.0
= 54
Table 8 summarizes Step 1, 2, and 3 sound calculations beginning with the initial dB values
obtained from Table 5, and resulting in the final actual operating conditions dB values.
Hz = 1300 x (0.167)
Hz= 217
Referring back to Table 6, since 217 Hz is within the 250 Hz octave band, the BFI value of 3
dB (obtained from the rightmost column of Table 5) is added to the 250 Hz octave band
column in our summary chart on the next page.
The resulting sound pressure level in rooms served by the HVAC system will be attenuated
to some extent by the ductwork itself and other duct components and may result in an
acceptable sound pressure level in the rooms served. However, any good designer must
determine what attenuation will likely occur in the system and if additional attenuation must
be added.
Note that although a fan is normally the major sound producer, you should also analyze the
entire system of ductwork, terminal devices and the room diffusers to determine what their
contribution to the HVAC system aerodynamic sound they may make, as well as what
attenuation they may provide.
Analyzing a duct system’s components for the purpose of determining the attenuation factors
of each separate element is covered later in this document.
The following formula provides the actual sound power level increase or decrease at each
octave band for a damper at specific operating conditions:
Where:
DLw = the net damper sound power level increase (or decrease if it is negative).
U = the damper velocity factor dependent upon the damper pressure drop.
S = the duct cross sectional area in square feet at the damper location.
107 dB = a constant for any damper and relates to a damper’s ability to attenuate sound.
U (Velocity Factor)
Determining the U (velocity factor) requires a separate series of calculations. The following
procedure will yield the U value. However, in lieu of following this lengthy procedure, Figure 9
can also be used to obtain approximate U values for common airflows and damper pressure
drops.
C = 15.9 x 106 DP S2 ÷ Q2
Where:
DP = the pressure drop across the damper from the manufacturer’s data.
Q = the CFM.
In lieu of S2/Q2, the term 1/V2 may be substituted, where V is the air velocity in feet/minute.
If C ≠ 1, BF = (C½ -1) ÷ (C - 1)
If C = 1, BF = 0.5
To calculate damper blockage factor BF for a single-blade damper, use the following formula:
If C < 4, BF = C0.5 - 1) ÷ (C - 1)
U = (Q ÷ S) ÷ BF
In lieu of Q/S, the term V may be substituted, where V is the air velocity in feet/minute.
The graph in Figure 9 provides Velocity Factor values for dampers within common airflow
ranges and pressure drops. Using the graph eliminates the need to go through the foregoing
three equations to calculate U.
K Factor
The K factor is determined by first calculating the Strouhal number, and then referring to the
Strouhal Graph in Figure 10, or using the following separate K equations. Since the Strouhal
number is dependent upon the octave band frequency, a separate Strouhal number (St) and
K factor must be determined for each of the eight octave bands.
Once the Strouhal numbers are calculated for each octave band, refer to Figure 10 to
determine the K factors or use the appropriate equation below to calculate the K factor
directly from the Strouhal number.
Determine the values for the terms in the Damper Sound Power Level (DLw) formula:
Where:
F = the octave band center frequency in Hz: (63, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, etc.).
U = the damper Velocity Factor: (Duct Air Velocity = 20,000 cfm/8 sq. ft.
= 2,500 ft/min)
From Figure 10, U = 4,650.
K requires solving for the Strouhal number at each octave band center frequency and then
using the graph in Figure 10 to determine K.
St = 60FD÷ U
Note that after the first St number is calculated, the remaining seven values can be quickly
determined by just doubling the previous St value.
Table 8 summarizes the terms and results of using the DLw formula to determine the net
sound power level of this damper at each octave band.
Note in Table 8 that since the DLw values are all positive, the damper has the potential for
adding to the net sound power level produced by the HVAC system. However, if this damper
was located within a short distance from the fan example of a few pages earlier, the net
change in the total sound power level would not perceptibly change since the fan’s sound
power level was significantly higher than this damper by approximately 25 to 35 dB
throughout all of the octave bands. See Table 3 for adding sound power or sound pressure
levels.
On the other hand, if this damper were near a room served by the HVAC system, and the fan
sound had already been substantially attenuated (lessened), the sound power level
generated by this damper could have a significant impact on the sound pressure level in the
room.
Keep in mind that control devices such as dampers should be located as far as possible
upstream to minimize their effect on the overall HVAC system sound power level.
The following formula will provide the actual sound power level increase or decrease at each
octave band for an elbow between two sections of the same size of duct:
Where:
ELw = the net elbow sound power level increase (or decrease if it is negative).
D = the height of the elbow in feet for elbows without turning vanes.
D = the cord length of a vane in feet for elbows with turning vanes.
EC = a constant that depends upon the type of elbow and relates to the elbow’s ability to
attenuate sound.
For an elbow with turning vanes, EC = 10 Log n -107, where n is the number of turning
vanes.
K Factor
The K factor is determined by first calculating the Strouhal number. Since the Strouhal
number is dependent upon the octave band frequency, a separate Strouhal number (St) and
K factor must be determined for each of the eight octave bands.
Once the Strouhal numbers are calculated for each octave band, see Figure 12 to obtain the
K factors. The K factors may also be calculated using the following formulae:
Determine the values for the terms in the Elbow Sound Power Level (DLw) formula:
Where:
F = the octave band center frequency in Hz: (63, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, etc.).
For an elbow with turning vanes, EC = 10 Log n – 107 = 10( 1.18) - 107 = 11.8- 107 = -95.2.
K requires solving for the Strouhal number at each octave band center frequency and then
using the graph in Figure 12 to determine K.
Note that after the first St number is calculated, the remaining seven values can be quickly
determined by just doubling the previous St value.
Table 9 summarizes the terms and results of using the ELw formula to determine the net
sound power level of this elbow at each octave band.
In Table 9, the ELw values are all positive, so this elbow adds to the sound power level
produced by the HVAC system. If this elbow was located within a short distance from the
Example Fan Sound Power Level Calculation, the net change in the total sound power level
would not perceptibly change since the fan’s sound power level was significantly higher by a
range of 16 to 51 dB throughout the octave bands. On the other hand, if this elbow were near
a room served by the HVAC system, the sound power level could have a very significant
impact on the sound pressure level in the room since this elbow generates significant sound
power in the lower frequency octaves.
The following formula will provide the actual sound power level increase or decrease at each
octave band for a duct junction or takeoff:
Where:
Elw = the net sound power level increase (or decrease if it is negative).
K Factor
The K factor is determined by first calculating the Strouhal number. Since the Strouhal
number is dependent upon the octave band frequency, a separate Strouhal number (St) and
K factor must be determined for each of the eight octave bands.
When the Strouhal numbers are calculated for each octave band, use Figure 12 to obtain the
K factors. Before using Figure 12, the velocity ratio M, between main duct airflow velocity
(UM) and branch duct airflow velocity (UB) is calculated as:
M = UM ÷ U B
The K factors may also be calculated using the following very lengthy formula:
K = -21.6 + 12.4 M0.67 - 16.5 M-0.3 (Log St) 5.0 M-0.25 (Log St)2
JC Factor
JC is a constant that depends upon the configuration of the junction and relates to the
junction’s ability to attenuate sound.
JC = -107 + Δr + ΔT
Where:
= r ÷ DBR
Note that for duct junctions and takeoffs without a radius, Δr is 0.0. However for duct
junctions and takeoffs with a radius, Δr is greater than zero, and reduces the sound power
level generated at the junction.
For junctions and takeoffs with a radius, the Δr values must be corrected for each octave
band. This requires taking the Strouhal number (already calculated for the K factors) for each
octave band and also the value of r ÷ DBR, then using Figure 13 to arrive at the final corrected
Δr values for each octave band.
The turbulence factor of ΔT applies if there are other duct elements within five duct diameters
upstream of the main junction or takeoff. After calculating M, Table 10 gives values for ΔT.
Table 10. Upstream Turbulence Factor Values for Junctions and Takeoffs
Figure 13. Final Corrected Δr Factors for Duct Junctions and Takeoffs with a Radius.
Determine the values for the terms in the Junction Sound Power Level DLw) formula:
Where:
F = the octave band center frequency in Hz: (63, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, etc.).
Determining the K Factor requires first calculating M and then solving for the Strouhal
number at each octave band center frequency. Then the graph in Figure 12 is used to
determine K.
M = UM ÷ U B
UM = 14,500 cfm ÷ 6 sq ft
= 2,420 fpm
UB = 1,600 fpm
Therefore:
M = 2,420 ÷ 1,600
M = 1.5
St = 60 F D ÷ UB
St = 60 x 63 Hz x 1 ft ÷ 1,600 = 2.4, K = -11
St =60 x 125 Hz x 1 ft ÷ 1,600 = 4.7, K = -18
St =60 x 250 Hz x 1 ft ÷ 1,600 = 9.4, K = -24
St = 60 x 500 Hz x 1 ft ÷ 1,600 = 18.8, K = -30
St = 60 x 1,000 Hz x 1 ft ÷1,600 = 37.5, K = -40
St = 60 x 2,000 Hz x 1 ft ÷1,600 = 75.0, K = -49
St = 60 x 4,000 Hz x 1 ft ÷ 1,600 = 150.0, K = -57
St = 60 x 8,000 Hz x 1 ft ÷ 1,600 = 300.0, K = -68
JC is a constant that depends upon the configuration of the junction and relates to the
junction’s ability to attenuate sound.
JC = -107 + Δr + ΔT
=0÷0
=0
Since there is upstream turbulence (a smoke damper) within five main duct diameters, Table
10 is used with the 1.5 value for M to obtain a ΔT value of approximately 1 dB.
Table 11 summarizes the terms and results of the JLw formula to determine the net sound
power level of this junction at each octave band.
Table 11. Sound Calculation Summary for Actual Fan Operating Conditions.
In Table 11, the JLw values are all positive, so this takeoff adds to the sound power level
produced by the HVAC system. Since a takeoff is normally near an occupied area, its sound
power level will likely have an impact on the HVAC sound in the area.
Note that the higher the Strouhal number, the lower the net sound power level will be. The
Strouhal number increases as the duct size increases and also as the airflow velocity is less,
so the general approach to maintaining an acceptable sound level is always to avoid high air
velocities.
Sound power levels at rated airflow’s are normally available for these devices from the
manufacturers. Manufacturers typically provide tables for these devices that give the NC
rating at specific airflow’s (cfm) through the device. Recall from the earlier discussion in this
document on noise criteria (NC) curves, that a NC rating means that the sound power level
does not exceed the dB values of the respective NC curve at any of the octave band center
frequencies. Thus to determine the octave band dB values associated with a specific NC
rating, one may refer to a plot of the respective NC curve and note the corresponding dB
values at each of the octave band center frequencies. To save having to do this, Table 12
lists the dB values associated with each of the common NC curves for the octave band
center frequencies.
However, note that the dB values associated with the NC curve (and listed in the table) are
the maximum levels to be expected. Actual device sound levels in many of the octave bands
may be less thereby resulting in a lower room sound level.
There will be little opportunity for sound attenuation after the diffuser. Many air diffusers are
available with an integral throttling damper as part of the diffuser. Since the throttling damper
has the potential for generating airflow sound, this must also be taken into account with
reference to the air diffuser’s sound rating. Therefore, whenever a diffuser has a throttling
damper in its collar, the following increases to the dB values in Table 9 apply:
Since a device such as a VAV terminal, is normally located above a room’s ceiling and also
uses additional ductwork to connect to the air diffusers, there is some potential for sound
attenuation of a terminal’s sound pressure level by its diffuser ductwork. However, since air
diffusers are typically the last element on the HVAC system, they should be selected based
upon an NC rating that does not exceed the room’s NC rating, since there will be little
opportunity for sound attenuation after the diffuser.
Likewise, any turbulence inducing device such as a balancing damper should be located as
far as practical (that is, 10 duct diameters) upstream of the diffuser to avoid possible
increased diffuser sound.
Room terminal units, especially fan powered boxes, also radiate sound that can be heard by
a room occupant if the acoustical attenuation of the ceiling material and the room is not
sufficient to absorb the radiated sound power. Manufacturer’s data for terminal units should
provide sound ratings for radiated sound and discharge sound. The section on sound
attenuation will cover how to account for the effects of both radiated and discharge sound.
Similarly, if we were doing some hammering nearby or talking loudly next to a duct, the
sound being produced could radiate to the inside of the duct system and travel along with the
sound already there. Sound that is radiated into a duct system is referred to as break-in
sound. Breakout sound can have an adverse impact on the overall HVAC system sound in a
space particularly if there is no drop ceiling between the space and the duct, or if the
acoustical absorption capability of the ceiling is limited.
While breakout sound can adversely impact the sound level in a space where there is an
inadequate acoustical barrier, breakout sound also reduces the overall sound power level in
the duct since the breakout sound carries off a portion of the total sound power level energy.
Thus, the breakout sound phenomenon has an attenuating effect on the sound that would
otherwise be present in the duct system. However, due to the complexity of attempting to
quantify this effect, it is typically omitted from HVAC sound analysis calculations.
In applications where there are very long duct runs, the breakout sound phenomenon can
have a significant positive effect. For details on breakout and break-in sound transmission
loss and related calculations, consult the ASHRAE HVAC Applications Manual, Chapter 42.
Laboratory Elements
The primary source of a chemical laboratory’s HVAC ambient sound is on the exhaust side of
the ventilation system. The principles that apply to HVAC supply side produced sound
(airflow’s through duct fittings, dampers, etc.) also apply to the exhaust side and are
calculated in the same manner. Since fume hoods are the terminal point of the exhaust
system, the NC factors that apply to a particular fume hood operating at specific airflow’s
must be obtained from the manufacturer and can then be used as part of the overall exhaust
system analysis.
Later in this document, you will learn how to perform a sound analysis of varying HVAC
system configurations including a laboratory fume hood exhaust system.
• Plenums
• Duct Attenuation
• Duct Silencers
• End Reflection
• Space Effect
So, even though the net sound power level at a given point in a duct system, such as
immediately upstream or downstream of an exhaust or supply fan may be quite high, the
sound power level will undergo a natural attenuation (reduction) with reference to more
distant areas of the duct system.
With respect to attaining an acceptable sound level in a given space or room, the key issue is
whether there will be sufficient natural attenuation to reduce the sound power to the proper
level, or whether the HVAC system needs to incorporate additional sound attenuation
elements to provide the required attenuation.
This chapter covers the attenuating effect of common HVAC system elements (also referred
to as transmission loss or insertion loss). With this information and the information provided
in Chapter 3, a given HVAC system or a portion of an HVAC system can be analyzed to
obtain the resultant sound power level at any given point. The next section provides
examples of how to perform this type of analysis.
As previously discussed, sound travel is independent of the direction of airflow. Therefore, all
calculations involving sound generation or attenuation apply to the exhaust portion of an
HVAC system as well as to the supply side.
Plenums
Plenums that are constructed of concrete will have virtually negligible attenuation effect on
sound generated by HVAC components. Plenums of unlined sheet metal will provide only a
little more attenuation effect than concrete. On the other hand, plenums that are fully lined
with at least two inches of sound adsorbing material can provide very significant sound
attenuation. The specific analysis of a given plenum is very complex from an acoustical
standpoint. Reference books provide mathematical procedures to calculate the attenuation of
certain plenum configurations, however these are very time consuming and are still only an
approximation. In addition, since there are almost endless arrangements possible with
plenum designs, it is extremely difficult to come up with precise results regardless of which
calculation procedure is used.
For practical considerations, it is best to assume that an unlined sheet metal plenum will have
a minimal effect on fan sound attenuation and therefore one can normally disregard its effect
on the fan sound generation. (Note that unlined sheet metal plenums are typically used in
centralized laboratory exhaust systems. However in laboratory exhaust systems, the
relatively long duct runs and large number of junctions usually provides adequate attenuation
of exhaust fan sound for the majority of areas served by such systems.)
On the other hand, supply fans discharging into fully lined plenums with 2-inch thick (or more)
sound absorbing material will typically reduce the low frequency (63 Hz to 125 Hz) sound
power by at least 5 dB, and will also reduce the upper frequencies (2,000 Hz to 8,000 Hz) by
at least 15 dB or more.
Figure 14 gives the sound absorption coefficient of different plenum materials. The higher the
plenum sound absorption coefficient, the greater will be the sound attenuation. Note how the
attenuation effect of the thicker fiberglass type liners is maximized at the lower frequencies.
Figure 14. Relative Sound Absorbing Capabilities of Various Plenum Lining Material.
The following is a simplified formula that can be used to determine the approximate
attenuation a plenum will provide:
Where:
From the 2-inch Thick Fiberglass row in Table 13 we get the sound absorption coefficients for
each octave band as indicated in Table 14.
Table 14. Plenum Sound Absorption Coefficients for 2-inch Thick Fiberglass.
The approximate dB attenuation for each octave band is determined by taking the sound
absorption coefficient for each octave band and using the preceding formula. The calculation
is shown for the 63 Hz band and the results for the other bands are listed in Table 15.
Where:
Therefore:
= 14.4
Note that when the sound absorption coefficients are the same (as they are for 500 Hz and
higher in this example), the attenuation level is the same.
Duct Attenuation
The most efficient approach to sound attenuation is to attain the necessary level of
attenuation by means of the duct runs. While this may not always be practical, or even
attainable, it is the optimum solution from a first cost and operating cost standpoint.
The attenuation or insertion loss of sheet metal ducts is highly dependent upon the size and
shape of the duct. Smaller ducts attenuate more dB per foot than larger ducts, and for a
given effective area, ducts that are more rectangular attenuate more dB than those that are
closer to being square or round. Also, ducts that have an internal lining attenuate sound
much more than unlined ducts.
Where:
Next, use the appropriate formula below to determine the dB attenuation per foot of duct
length or refer to Table 16.
= 168 ÷ 12
= 14 feet
= 1728 ÷ 144
= 12 sq ft
P/A = 14 ÷ 12 = 1.17
With reference to Table 16, the following dB attenuation factors per foot can be interpolated:
Multiplying the values obtained by 80 feet yields the following attenuation in each octave
band:
To determine the attenuation of externally insulated rectangular ducts, multiply the final
attenuation figures obtained by the procedure for unlined (non-insulated) ducts, by 2.0.
In the previous example, the sound attenuation of the 80 foot run of 48-inch by 30-inch duct
would thus be approximately twice the values listed if the exterior of the duct were thermally
insulated.
Figure 15. FW Values vs. dB Attenuation For Rectangular and Round Duct Elbows.
Equations have been developed over the last several years to calculate the specific dB
attenuation levels for various lining thickness; however, these are complex and would
consume extensive time. Table 17 and Table 18 provide values for rectangular ducts with 1-
inch and 2-inch internal acoustical linings based upon the Perimeter to Area (P/A) ratio of the
duct. The P/A ratio is calculated by dividing the duct perimeter (P) in feet by the area (A) in
square feet. Also, due to other factors involved in duct sound transmission, no more than 40
dB should be used when determining the attenuation values of a specific length of lined duct.
Table 17. One-Inch Thick Fiberglass Lined Rectangular Duct Attenuation Per Foot of Length.
Table 18. Two-Inch Thick Fiberglass Lined Rectangular Duct Attenuation Per Foot of Length.
Table 20. One-Inch Thick Fiberglass Lined Round Duct Attenuation Per Foot of Length.
Duct Elbows
Duct elbows are quite effective at attenuating sound in the mid frequency levels. The most
effective attenuation is in rectangular elbows, which are lined elbows and do not have turning
vanes. The minimum attenuation occurs in unlined round elbows. More data has been
derived for rectangular elbows. Round elbows that are lined present a very complex scenario
and, for that reason, are not discussed here.
Table 21. Two-Inch Thick Fiberglass Lined Round Duct Attenuation Per Foot of Length.
When the FW values are determined, refer to the appropriate curve in Figure 15 to determine
the dB attenuation at each octave band.
FW = Frequency x 0.036
Table 22 lists the calculated FW factors and the corresponding attenuation dB values using
the “RECTANGULAR, SQUARE, UNLINED, WITH VANES” curve.
Since round ducts are more efficient in conveying air than the same area of rectangular duct,
they are also more efficient at conveying sound, and will provide less attenuation whether
they are lined or unlined.
In Figure 15, the curves that apply to lined elbows, are based upon at least a 1-inch thick
lining, and the lining extending at least one to two duct diameters ahead of and after the
elbow.
Once the term enclosed within the parenthesis is calculated, Figure 17 provides dB values.
For example, assume that a 36-inch x 18-inch rectangular duct main has an 8-inch round 90
degree takeoff that is followed by a 32-inch x 18-inch continuation of the duct main. What
attenuation would this junction provide for the 8-inch and the reduced sized main?
= 10 Log [0.0803]
= 10 Log [0.9197]
Duct Silencers
Conventional duct silencers consist of prefabricated arrangements of sound absorbing
material intended for insertion within a duct run to attenuate sound. They offer only limited
attenuation in the low frequency (125 Hz and below) octave bands, and moderate attenuation
at the high frequency bands. Their maximum attenuation is in the mid frequency (that is,
1,000 Hz) octave bands. Apart from the extra cost of silencers, they also require a certain
amount of physical space and create additional pressure drop.
If a duct silencer is added to a duct run, the silencer will provide a certain attenuation or
insertion loss of the sound power level generated upstream. However, like any duct fitting, a
silencer also generates some sound power of its own. Therefore, aside from applying the
attenuation provided by a silencer to the sound power level, also determine if the sound
power generated by the silencer will have an appreciable impact on the net sound power
level.
Consult the manufacturer’s data sheets for the attenuation and sound power level generation
data for a given silencer. Also be sure to follow the manufacturer’s instructions regarding the
proper installation and location for a silencer. For proper functionality, there should be a
certain minimum distance, equivalent to a number of duct diameters, between the discharge
of a fan and the silencer, and between the silencer and other duct elements (elbows, etc.).
End Reflection
When ducts terminate into a ceiling air diffuser that discharges air into a room, a significant
amount of low frequency sound energy is reflected back into the ductwork. This phenomenon
is referred to as end reflection. The effect of duct end reflection is estimated by the following
formula:
Table 24 lists end reflection attenuation values for round and square ducts based upon this
formula.
Table 24. End Reflection Attenuation for Typical Room Discharge Size Ducts.
ARI Standard 885-90 (Procedure for Estimating Occupied Space Sound Levels in the
Application of Air Terminals and Outlets) states that an Environmental Adjustment Factor
should be subtracted from the sound power rating of terminals and outlets if the sound power
test data has been measured under free field (open space) conditions rather than
reverberant (room like) conditions.
When utilizing a manufacturer’s sound rating data, verify whether the data has been obtained
under a reverberant or free field test setup. If the data has been obtained under a free field
test condition, then subtract the Environmental Adjustment Factor from the free field sound
rating data:
Environmental adjustment factors for noise rating data obtained under Free Field test
conditions.
Space Effect
The last factor affecting attenuation of the sound power level to an acceptable room sound
pressure level is the ability of the room to absorb and attenuate the sound power.
A room’s ability to attenuate the sound to an acceptable level is dependent upon its size,
shape, ceiling height, acoustical properties, and other factors. The following equation
(referred to as the Schultz equation) provides the means to calculate the attenuation and the
resulting sound pressure level at a given location from a sound source.
Where:
V = Room Volume.
For example, assume that a laboratory room is 24 feet long by 12 feet wide by 10 feet high.
What attenuation would this room to provide at 10 feet from a supply air diffuser?
Substituting each octave band frequency in the (f) term will yield the following room dB
attenuation values at each octave band:
The attenuation values determined for the room are then subtracted from the sound power
level value at the sound source to get the sound pressure level at the point of concern.
When multiple sound sources are present (as is the case with several supply air diffusers or
fume hoods), separate calculations are done to arrive at the sound pressure level due to
each separate sound source. Then the sound pressure levels can be combined according to
Table 3 to determine the net resulting sound pressure level at the point of concern.
Radiated sound is essentially the breakout component of the sound generated by the device
and has the potential of entering the room primarily on a direct path. Most often this
component of sound energy must penetrate a dropped ceiling or other architectural features
before entering a room.
For air terminal units located above a dropped ceiling, the radiated sound component is quite
often (and ideally) attenuated by the dropped ceiling and the plenum effect of the space
above the ceiling. Table 25 gives the attenuation effect of the combination of a typical
dropped ceiling and the “plenum” space above it. Use these values to determine the net
sound power level reduction in the radiated sound power level of devices located a few feet
above a dropped ceiling.
Table 25. Attenuation of a Dropped Ceiling and Plenum on Radiated Sound Ceiling.
5/8-inch 10 dB 15 dB 22 dB 26 dB 30 dB 28 dB 30 dB 30 dB
Thick
Gypsum
Board
After the radiated sound attenuation has been deducted from the radiated sound power level
of a unit, the resulting sound power level value should be compared with the discharge sound
power level that will typically occur at the supply air diffuser(s) present in the room. Table 3 in
Chapter 2 indicates the resulting sound power level of two sound power levels.
Note that in some instances, a sound producing device may be within the occupied room
itself, or there may not be a dropped ceiling. In such cases, there is no attenuation as
indicated in Table 25, and the radiated sound power level must be directly compared with the
discharge sound power level in the room. In this type of situation, it is possible that the
combined sound power level is mainly due to the radiated sound pressure level.
Figure 16 shows a portion of an HVAC system including Room 101, which is served by the
system. Although there are computer programs that can provide an analysis of a given
system configuration, it is advantageous to understand the process and be able to determine
the effect of a single element on a given system. The following example illustrates the
analysis of this system with respect to the sound level that can be expected to result in Room
101 due to the HVAC system.
With reference to the fan sound power level calculation procedure from Chapter 3, the fan’s
sound power level rating of 1 cfm and 1.00 in. WC, as shown in Table 5. These values are
part of the fan’s total sound power and are listed in the first horizontal row of Table 26.
= 10 (4.2) + 20 (0.477)
= 42 + 9.5
= 51.5
Hz = 1,225 x 0.167
Hz = 204
Referring back to Table 6, the 204 Hz is within the 250 Hz octave band. Therefore, the BFI
value of 3 dB (from Table 5) is added as a contributing component of sound power level of
the 250 Hz octave band.
The final values from Table 26 represent the expected supply fan generated noise level
(GNL). At the end of this analysis, these values are entered into the HVAC system - sound
analysis form, that is shown in Figure 17. This form provides a means to systematically
tabulate the individual element sound levels for an HVAC system or a portion of a system to
determine the resultant sound power level. A blank copy of this form (along with other forms)
is provided in the Appendix. You can use these forms when making sound level analysis of
actual systems.
Duct Section A
Airflow in the velocity range typically used in HVAC systems does not generate appreciable
sound within straight duct runs; therefore, no generated noise level (GNL) calculation
procedure was given in an earlier section. Rather, ducts may be assumed to only attenuate
the sound generated by other duct elements.
Following the procedure given on HVAC Sound Attenuation for Sheet Metal Ducts, first
calculate the P/A (Perimeter to Area ratio) for the HVAC system’s Duct Section A.
= (3 ft +4 ft +3 ft + 4 ft)
= 14 feet
= (3 ft x 4 ft)
= 12 square feet
With reference to Table 16, we can assume the following attenuation per foot of duct length:
Multiplying these values by 14 feet yields the following attenuation in each octave band:
These values are also entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form shown in Figure
17.
Duct Elbow B
While airflow through an elbow generates sound, it also attenuates sound already generated
(in this case the fan sound). Following the procedure given for Elbow Airflow Noise in the
HVAC Sound Sources section, the basic formula is:
Where:
ELw = the net elbow sound power level increase (or decrease if it is negative).
EC = a constant.
The K factor is determined by first calculating the Strouhal for each of the eight octave bands.
Figure 12 gives K factor values for the Strouhal numbers.
St = 60FD ÷ U
Table 27 sums up the factors comprising the ELw values for each octave band.
* Although this value adds up to -14 dB, a zero is entered as the net result since it is considered that a GNL
cannot be less than zero.
These values are now entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as
Elbow B “GNL” entries.
Next, you must estimate the attenuation that the elbow will provide. To estimate the
attenuation provided by either a rectangular or round elbow, you must first calculate the
Frequency Width (FW) factor for the elbow at each octave band.
Where:
Width = the nominal duct width in inches. (48 in. is used since the elbow is in the vertical
plane.)
After the FW values are determined, refer to Figure 15 for the dB attenuation at each octave
band. (The rectangular, square, unlined with vanes curve applies.) The following chart lists
the calculated FW factors and the corresponding attenuation values from the
“RECTANGULAR, SQUARE, UNLINED, WITH VANES” curve.
These values are now entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as
Elbow B “ATTENUATION” entries.
Duct Section C
Since this is the same size duct as Section A, the same attenuation per foot of duct length
applies:
dB dB dB dB dB dB dB dB
Multiplying these values by the 6 feet yields the following attenuation in each octave band:
These values are entered into the Figure 17 form as Duct Section C, ATTENUATION.
Junction D
Following the procedure given for Junction and Takeoff Airflow Noise in Chapter 3, HVAC
Sound Sources, the basic formula is:
Where:
Elw = the net sound power level increase (or decrease if it is negative).
S = the branch duct cross sectional area in square feet (16 in. x 36 in. ÷ 144) = 4.
M = UM ÷ UB.
Since all ducts leaving the junction have the same airflow velocity, UM and UB = 1,250 FPM.
Therefore, M = 1.0.
Next, the Strouhal number is determined for each octave band center frequency. Then the
graph in Figure 13 will provide the K values.
*Estimated Values
JC is a constant that depends upon the configuration of the junction and relates to the
junction’s ability to attenuate sound.
JC = -107 + Δr + ΔT
Where:
= 16 in. ÷ 16 in.
= 1.0.
ΔT = a turbulence factor that applies since there is another duct element (elbow B) within
five duct diameters upstream. However since M = 0.0, Table 10 indicates that ΔT will be
0.0.
The following chart summarizes the terms and results of the JLw formula to determine the
GNL of this junction at each octave band.
These values are now entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as
Junction D GNL entries.
Next, we need to come up with the attenuation that Junction D will provide. When a takeoff
occurs on a main duct, the available sound energy must divide between the resulting duct
runs after the takeoff. As a result, neither duct at the point where it leaves a junction can have
all of the sound power level energy that was available at that point. The following formula
estimates the resulting dB attenuation occurring at a junction:
The 1.8 dB attenuation is entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) for
Junction D.
Duct Section E
Duct Perimeter = (32 in. + 36 in. + 32 in. + 36 in.) ÷ 12 = 11.33
=8
P/A = 11.33 ÷ 8
= 1.42
With reference to Table 16, the following attenuation applies per foot of duct length:
Multiplying these values by the 16 feet yields the following attenuation in each octave band:
These values are entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form shown in Figure 17.
Junction F
Since the takeoff at Junction F has the same physical dimensions and airflow velocity as the
takeoff at Junction D, calculating the GNL is identical to that previously done for Junction D,
and the same GNL values apply. Therefore, the same values are entered into the HVAC
system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as Junction F GNL entries.
Note that there is a difference in determining the attenuation values for Junction F since the
ratio between the branch duct and the main duct are different at junction F than they were for
Junction D.
= 10 Log [4 sq ft ÷ 8 sq ft]
3.0 dB attenuation is entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) for
Junction F.
Duct Section G
Duct Perimeter = (16 in. + 36 in. + 16 in. + 36 in.) ÷ 12
= 8.67
=4
P/A = 8.67/4
= 2.17
With reference to Table 16, the following attenuation applies per foot of duct length:
Multiplying these values by the 14 feet yields the following attenuation in each octave band:
Duct Takeoff/Junction H
Following the procedure given for Junction and Takeoff Airflow Noise in Chapter 3, HVAC
Sound Sources, the basic formula is:
Where:
Elw = the net sound power level increase (or decrease if it is negative).
M = 1,250 ÷ 1,528
= 0.8
Next, the Strouhal number is determined for each octave band center frequency. Then the
graph in Figure 13 provides the K values.
*Estimated Value
JC is a constant that depends upon the configuration of the junction and relates to the
junction’s ability to attenuate sound.
JC = -107 + Δr + ΔT
ΔT is a turbulence factor that doesn’t apply since there is no element within five duct
diameters upstream of Junction H.
Therefore:
= -107
The following chart summarizes the terms and results of the JLw formula to determine the
GNL of Junction H at each octave band.
Next, the Strouhal number is determined for each octave band center frequency. Then the
graph in Figure 13 will provide the K values.
*Estimated Value
JC is a constant that depends upon the configuration of the junction and relates to the
junction’s ability to attenuate sound.
JC = - 107 + Δr + ΔT
ΔT is a turbulence factor that doesn’t apply since there is no element within five duct
diameters upstream of Junction H.
Therefore:
= -107
The following chart summarizes the terms and results of the JLw formula to determine the
GNL of Junction H at each octave band.
These values are entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as
Junction H GNL entries.
Whenever a takeoff occurs on a main duct, the sound energy is also divided between the
resulting duct runs after the takeoff, so that neither duct at the point where it leaves a junction
or takeoff has all of the sound power level energy. The following formula approximates the
resulting dB attenuation occurring at a junction:
The 6.9 dB attenuation is entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) for
Junction H.
Duct Section I
Duct Diameter = 12 inches
With reference to Table 16, the following attenuation applies per foot of duct length:
Multiplying these values by the 8 feet yields the following attenuation in each octave band:
Duct Elbow J
Following the procedure for determining Elbow Airflow Noise, the basic formula is:
Where:
ELw = the net elbow sound power level increase (or decrease if it is negative).
S = the duct cross sectional area in square feet = 0.79 sq ft as calculated previously.
For elbows without turning vanes, D is the height of the elbow in feet (12 in. = 1 ft).
The K factor is determined by first calculating the Strouhal for each of the eight octave bands.
Figure 12 gives K factor values for the Strouhal numbers.
St = 60 F D ÷ U
*Estimated Value
The chart below sums up the factors comprising the ELw values for each octave band.
These values are now entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as
Elbow J GNL entries.
Frequency is the octave band Hz. Width is the duct width (12 in.)
When the FW values are determined, Figure 16 gives the dB attenuation at each octave
band from the ROUND ELBOWS curve.
These values are entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as Elbow
J ATTENUATION entries.
Reheat Terminal
The reheat terminal GNL values are obtained from the manufacturer and are restated in the
chart below. (Note also that in this example, the short duct section after elbow J and before
the Reheat Terminal is considered to have a negligible effect on the discharge sound and is
therefore not evaluated.)
The COMBINATION sound pressure level values that result due to the reheat terminal GNL
discharge sound and the preceding sound pressure level are derived with reference to Table
3, which covers adding sound pressure levels.
Duct Sections L
Two flexible 12-inch diameter ducts with 1-inch thick lining. Since the outlet from the reheat
terminal is divided between two 12-inch ducts, the sound power in at the beginning of each is
divided between the two duct runs by the following junction attenuation formula:
The 3.0 dB attenuation is entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as
Duct Division L.
With reference to Table 17, the following attenuation applies per foot of 12-inch diameter, 1-
inch lined duct:
Multiplying these values by the 10 feet yields the following attenuation in each octave band:
These values are now entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as
Duct Section L ATTENUATION.
Perforated Diffuser
The perforated diffuser GNL NC rating is listed as NC 35 by the manufacturer and are
expanded in the chart below based on the values from Table 12 and are then entered into
Figure 17.
End Reflection
When ducts terminate into a ceiling air diffuser, a significant amount of low frequency sound
energy is reflected back as end reflection.
From Table 24, the end reflection attenuation values for 12-inch diameter round duct is
shown in the following chart.
These values are now entered into the HVAC system - sound analysis form (Figure 17) as
End Reflection ATTENUATION.
Space Effect
The last factor regarding attenuation of the sound power level is the ability of the room to
absorb and attenuate the sound power.
The following equation (referred to as the Schultz equation) provides the means to calculate
the resultant room sound pressure level (Rlp) at a given octave band level five feet above the
floor, from the sound power level present at the diffuser(s).
RLp = 27.6 Log (H) + 5 Log (A) + 3 Log (f) -1.3 Log (N) - 30
Where:
= (12 ft x 24 ft ÷ 2) ÷ 100.
= (144) ÷ 100
= 1.44
RLp = 27.6 Log (10) + 5 Log (1.4) + 3 Log (Hz) -1.3 Log (2) – 30
Substituting each octave band frequency in the Hz term will yield the following room dB
attenuation values at each octave band:
The attenuation values determined for the room are then subtracted from the sound power
level values that are present at the diffusers to yield the sound pressure level five feet above
the floor in the vicinity of the respective diffuser.
The last row of entries on the second part of Figure 17 show the dB sound pressure level
values calculated for Room 101. These are reproduced in the chart below and plotted on the
RC curve of Figure 18.
As Figure 18 illustrates, the sound pressure level in the room, due to the supply system, is
acceptable for a laboratory (NC 45), and except for the relatively moderate amount of lower
frequency sound in the 125 to 500 Hz range, would even be acceptable in an office.
With reference to the sound analysis data in Figure 17, we can see that the sound power
level in the 125 to 500 Hz range continues to go down until it reaches the 74 to 69 dB level
just prior to the reheat terminal. At this point, the combined sound power with that of the
reheat terminal results in a slight increase to about 76 to 70 dB.
Note that if the sound power level in this Hz range were brought down to no more than 60 dB
by using 1-inch lined ductwork throughout the system, the resultant sound power level at that
point would remain at the reheat terminal GNL level of 70 to 62 dB. This reduction of 6 to 8
dB would result in the room curve lying more closely to the NC 30 and NC 35 curves and also
significantly reduce the lower frequency rumble.
• The major source of sound in a system is typically the supply fan. In this example, it
has a peak sound power level of 100.5 dB at 250 Hz.
• Duct fittings such as rectangular elbows, and takeoffs (such as, B & H), provide a
major attenuating effect on sound power.
• Unlined sheet metal duct, especially the larger sizes (such as, A, C, & E), offers very
limited sound attenuation.
• Although duct fittings generate sound, their GNL effect typically does not adversely
impact the sound power level at moderate airflow rates (up to 2,000 fpm).
• Unless a fan is relatively close to a room, the major source of sound in rooms with
higher air change rates (such as laboratories with fume hoods open) will be caused
by the terminal unit and/or the air diffusers.
• Lined ducts offer considerable sound attenuation. (Compare the unlined duct section
L to lined duct section L.)
Because it is necessary for higher ventilation airflow rates in rooms such as chemical
laboratories, it is not typically feasible to maintain a ventilation ambient sound level on a par
with an office environment (RC or NC Criteria of 30 to 35). Depending upon the purpose of
the laboratory, somewhat higher sound levels are normally acceptable. A two person
laboratory intended for occupancy by individuals who normally concentrate on their separate
research projects may be acceptable with a 45 to 50 Noise Criteria sound level. On the other
hand, academic laboratories where the instructor must almost continuously communicate and
be heard by the students should preferably not exceed 40 dB.
As discussed earlier, HVAC generated sound that has sufficiently high energy, will not only
become part of the sound within the duct system (discharge sound), but will also be audible
outside of the device that is generating the sound. This externally audible sound is radiated
sound and is also referred to as breakout sound. Breakout sound can have an adverse
impact on the overall HVAC system sound in a space particularly if there is no drop ceiling
between the room space and the HVAC components, or if the acoustical absorption
capability of the ceiling is limited.
Figure 19 shows a portion of a chemical laboratory room with potential HVAC sound sources
identified. Note that because of the probable high airflow rates, the radiated sound potential
of the SUPPLY VAV TERMINAL and the EXHAUST TERMINALS should be part of the
room’s sound analysis.
To make a proper system analysis, NC factors that apply to a particular fume hood operating
at specific exhaust airflow’s would need to be provided by the manufacturer. However, since
fume hood manufacturers do not normally test their product for sound, a precise means of
analyzing the resulting sound at varying sash openings does not (as of this time) exist.
It is recommended that particular attention be given to the sound level ratings of VAV fume
hood exhaust terminals, especially the radiated component, since, in many cases, these
components are located in the laboratory room directly atop the fume hood.
When a fume hood sash is open, exhaust terminal discharge sound will emanate from the
fume hood opening and be the major source of ventilation sound heard by the fume hood
user. In this case, the discharge sound level rating provided by the exhaust terminal
manufacturer (at various airflows) should be reviewed for acceptability.
For a central laboratory exhaust system, the exhaust fan sound power level will typically be
substantially attenuated due to the length of the connecting ductwork and the numerous
junctions and takeoffs on the central exhaust system. Therefore, except for laboratory units
located close to the exhaust fans themselves, the sound power level of the exhaust fans can
be largely disregarded since they will likely be attenuated to a value less than that of the
fume hood exhaust terminals.
Since fume hood exhaust ducts cannot utilize an internal sound absorbing lining (such as,
fiberglass), there is typically only a minimal amount of attenuation possible for exhaust
terminals that are located within laboratory rooms or very close to the fume hoods. The only
alternative (which is not always possible) is to locate fume hood exhaust terminals above the
ceiling, and at a significant distance downstream from the fume hood.
With reference to Figure 20, determine if the radiated sound pressure level and also the
discharge sound pressure level this arrangement is likely to produce for someone who
happens to be standing in the laboratory room midway between the two fume hoods. Assume
each fume hood sash is about 50% open. Also, consider how this design arrangement will
impact a desired room Noise Criteria of NC-40.
The following tables show the manufacturer’s exhaust terminal sound ratings at 50% of
maximum airflow (450 cfm).
Exhaust Terminal Reverberant Radiated Sound Power Level at 50% Maximum Airflow
Exhaust Terminal Reverberant Discharge Sound Power Level at 50% Maximum Airflow
NOTE: Exhaust terminal manufacturer’s sound ratings typically cover only the 125 to 4,000 Hz octave bands.
Radiated Sound
First, we’ll determine the effect of the radiated sound pressure level of the two exhaust
terminals. With reference to the text covering Radiated Sound Attenuation, Table 25 gives
expected attenuation of typical dropped ceiling material on radiated sound that originates
above the ceiling.
Table 28. Attenuation of a Dropped Ceiling and Plenum on Radiated Sound (repeated).
5/8-inch 10 dB 15 dB 22 dB 26 dB 30 dB 28 dB 30 dB 30 dB
Thick
Gypsum
Board
Subtracting the Table 28 values for 5/8 inch-thick fiberglass tiles from the manufacturer’s
rating data for the 125 Hz through 4,000 Hz bands, leaves the following radiated sound level
at the ceiling just below each terminal:
To determine the attenuation and subsequently the sound power level a person would
experience standing mid way between the two terminals (about a 7 foot distance from the
person’s ears to each point in the ceiling just below the terminals), the Space Effect (Schultz)
equation is used:
Where:
Substituting each octave band frequency in the equation’s (f) term will yield the following
room dB attenuation values at each octave band:
Subtracting these values from the radiated sound level at the ceiling yields the following room
sound pressure level at 5 feet above the floor from each terminal:
Since each of the two exhaust terminals generates a sound pressure level of equal value that
converge at the same point, add 3 dB to the individual sound pressure level value (per Table
3), to determine the resulting sound pressure level at that point. The result is listed in the
following table:
The values determined for the radiated sound pressure level are quite low and will not
adversely affect the laboratory noise criteria level of 40 dB. Remember that these values are
for the radiated sound pressure level component; there is also the discharge sound power
component that must be addressed.
Discharge Sound
Since the terminals are 8 inches in diameter and will be horizontal, we can assume that there
will be one 90 degree radius type of elbow and some modest length of unlined round duct
between each of the exhaust terminals and the fume hood.
With respect to an 8 inch diameter 90 degree radius type of elbow, there will be some small
amount of sound power generated as 450 cfm of air (1,290 fpm) passes through it, and there
will also be some attenuation. Using the procedures in Chapter 3 and Chapter 4, we would
find that the sound power level generated by the elbow is too low to impact the exhaust
terminal sound power. However, the elbow would still attenuate a few decibels at the upper
frequencies and would result in the following discharge sound power level:
Since a round unlined duct provides very little attenuation, we can assume that the above
discharge sound power level will exist at the fume hood connection.
The primary attenuation of the fume hood exhaust air terminal will occur at the junction with
the fume hood due to end reflection, and also the baffle arrangement inside the fume hood.
As previously stated, there is very little information on the properties of fume hoods with
respect to sound power generation or attenuation, so we will base our final values on
attenuation by means of end reflection alone.
Table 24 lists end reflection attenuation values. Subtracting the appropriate end reflection
values for an 8-inch round duct from the preceding chart results in the following final
discharge sound power level values:
We can expect this sound power level to exist at the open sash of each fume hood. With
respect to the Noise Criterion curves (Figure 5), these dB values would not exceed those of
the NC-40 curve. With respect to the person standing some distance away, the resulting
sound pressure level would further decrease in accordance with the Space Effect equation.
Note that this analysis assumed that the fume hoods were 50% open. The sound power level
would increase as fume hood sashes are opened further. But the 50% open value is a
reasonable level to use for general ambient noise analysis, so the conclusion would be that
the room noise level would be very acceptable for a chemical laboratory.
• What sound pressure level would a person then experience when standing at the
front of a fume hood with the sash 50% open?
• Would the new sound pressure level experienced by a person at the fume hood be
noticeably different from the previous example?
The difference in this arrangement is that the radiated sound power level will not be
attenuated by the drop ceiling, and the discharge sound power level will not be attenuated by
a duct elbow.
As a result, the person standing at the fume hood, which would probably be within only 3 feet
or so from the exhaust terminal, would be exposed to the following full radiated sound level:
In addition, the sound pressure level at the fume hood sash would only be attenuated by the
fume hood’s End Reflection and not by the exhaust duct elbow, so it would be:
Since these two sources of sound are physically very close together, we use the procedure of
Table 3 to come up with the combined results that become a bit higher at the lower frequency
as listed in the following chart:
This is the sound pressure level that a user at the fume hood would experience while the
fume hood sash is at about 50% open.
Recall that a 3 dB increase in sound pressure level will be noticeable. Since all of the decibel
values listed above are about 2 to 3 dB higher than in the previous example (where
everything was located above the ceiling), the resulting sound pressure level would be
noticeable to the user.
• Fans
• Duct configurations
• Terminal equipment
Following these guidelines will help attain an HVAC system design with the lowest practical
ambient sound level. But remember, the objective is not a “nearly silent” system, but one that
will provide a desirable background sound level that is conducive to the type of occupancy or
activity to be performed in the conditioned space.
See Table 29 for suggestions regarding reducing annoying sound in existing ventilation
systems.
• In general, HVAC systems utilizing efficient air delivery designs will generate and
transmit less sound than system configurations with higher pressure drops, higher
airflow velocities, and lower operating efficiencies.
• Rooms without a dropped ceiling and exposed ductwork are especially prone to
radiated sound from terminal units, and other duct elements. Consider lowering
airflow velocity by using larger sized duct and acoustical covering over terminal units
and sharp elbows to reduce sound breakout.
• Require ductwork to be well sealed. Much sound is due to air leaking out of supply
ducts and also leakage into exhaust ducts. In addition, reducing air leakage will
reduce the amount of the overall required airflow in the system, which increases
system efficiency and lessens the sound.
• Room size and furnishings have a large effect on the final ambient sound level.
Larger rooms absorb and dissipate sound better than smaller rooms. It is difficult to
achieve a low sound in smaller rooms since there is less sound energy absorption by
the furnishings and less overall Space Effect (ambient sound reduction due to the
volumetric effect).
• Low frequency noise is the hardest to attenuate and typically the most annoying.
Effective low frequency sound attenuation normally requires duct linings of at least
two inches thick.
Fans
• Backward inclined centrifugal fans are recommended for the lowest noise generation.
• Axial fans also have a higher BFI (blade frequency increment) component that
typically contributes the most to annoying fan sound.
• Always select the most efficient fan for the purpose and strive for operation near the
top of the fan curve.
• Variable speed drives are also a contributing source of noise in equipment rooms
and consequently to overall fan system sound. Of the types of variable speed drives
available, the current source is typically the quietest, while a voltage source is
typically the noisiest.
• Avoid VAV fan operation at the point where variable inlet vanes must be nearly
closed. Inlet vanes tend to generate much low frequency sound as the vanes near
the closed position.
• Use a fan configuration that minimizes the system effect as much as possible.
Airflow into and out of the fan should avoid swirling and turbulence.
• Plenums can help attenuate considerable fan sound. This is a particularly effective
means of lowering the sound of return or exhaust systems. For supply systems,
plenums with one or two inches of sound absorbing material are especially effective
at attenuating fan sound.
• When designing an HVAC system, never try to specify the resulting sound pressure
level of a HVAC system component. Instead, specify the required sound pressure
level (room NC or RC) to be attained in the space(s) served and where in the room
the measurement should be taken.
• When considering a specific fan for a particular application, always obtain the
manufacturer’s certified sound rating at the standard rating condition of 1 cfm and
1.00 in. WC.
Duct Configurations
• Size the duct system so airflow velocity does not need to exceed 1,200 fpm to meet
relatively low room sound pressure level requirements (such as, NC 35). Velocities
up to 1800 can be used for areas where NC 45 is acceptable.
• Avoid sharp duct bends, transition pieces with steep angles, sharp edge takeoffs and
junctions, and in general any element that causes air turbulence and higher pressure
drops. Use gradual angular transitions (15 degree maximum), radius type elbows
and takeoffs with turning vanes, and in general whatever type of configuration will
provide a more streamlined airflow in the entire HVAC system.
• Round sheet metal ducts are the most efficient at conveying airflow, but offer less
sound attenuation per given length than equivalent sized rectangular ducts.
• Ducts with internal linings of 1- or 2-inch thickness offer significant sound attenuation,
especially for higher frequency sound.
• Avoid direct duct runs between noisy rooms (duplicating machines, operating
equipment, etc.) and areas requiring low sound levels, to prevent room noise from
being transmitted by the ductwork (duct borne crosstalk).
• Wrapping the exterior of ducts with insulation will reduce the radiated sound, but will
not reduce the discharge sound level. It may sometimes even increase the discharge
sound since it prevents duct borne sound energy from radiating out from the
ductwork (in much the same way as insulation retards thermal losses).
Terminal Equipment
• Moderate airflow velocities are the key to minimizing the sound generated by air
terminal units. Consider going to a larger size air terminal to reduce the airflow
velocity and provide a more acceptable level of radiated and discharge sound in the
space served.
• Terminals serving individual office areas should be located in corridors rather than
above the office served to lessen the effect of the terminal produced discharge and
radiated sound.
• Whenever possible, terminals serving larger general offices should be located above
areas that will be less sensitive to HVAC sound, such as over copy machines,
printers, supplies storage, etc.
• Terminals should be mounted as high above the room’s ceiling as practical. At least
three feet above a dropped ceiling should be maintained whenever possible.
• Lined metal duct between a supply terminal and the air diffusers will best attenuate
the air terminal unit sound and allow the least sound breakout. Purposely locating
terminals to use longer runs to diffusers will enable more attenuation of terminal
sound.
• Minimize the use of flex duct as it is likely to generate sound at bends and wherever
sagging or compression occurs.
• Air diffuser sound is also directly dependent upon the type of diffuser and the airflow
velocity. For instance, a perforated diffuser has a higher sound level than a louver
type. Use an ample number of diffusers in a space to maintain a lower airflow velocity
and thus a lower sound level. Also, if a supply diffuser is used in a return/exhaust
application, airflow should be reduced to maintain the desired sound level.
• Use dampers to enable system balancing as far upstream as possible from the
spaces served by the system. Throttling dampers at diffusers should only be used for
small volume adjustments not requiring more than 0.10 in. WC pressure drop.
Table 29. Existing Ventilation System - Noise Troubleshooting and Potential Remedy.
Linings
Internal duct lining and plenum lining is perhaps the most effective means of attenuating
sound. Note that the lining must be on the inside of the duct and must be at least one-inch
thick to be effective. Crosstalk, which occurs when room sound travels to another room by
means of a common duct connection, can mostly be eliminated if the interconnecting duct is
lined.
Note that it is important that duct lining not be allowed to become wet. Otherwise, it must
invariably be removed and replaced since once it becomes moist, it is virtually impossible to
sanitize it against the bacteria growth that inevitably occurs.
Although fiberglass has been the most prevalent lining composition, alternate materials such
as fibrous metal is also available. Fibrous metal lining differs from fiberglass in that it is not
applied as a soft thick material, but rather it is compressed into a thin sheet. Further, fibrous
metal can be tuned to closely match the frequency needing attenuation by altering its
permeability, texture, thickness and the space between the duct wall and the material.
They offer only limited attenuation in the low frequency (125 Hz and below) octave bands,
and moderate attenuation at the high frequency bands. Their maximum attenuation is in the
mid frequency (1,000 Hz) octave bands. Apart from the cost of silencers, they require a
certain amount of physical space and will create an additional duct system pressure drop.
Be sure to follow the manufacturer’s instructions regarding the proper installation and location
for a duct attenuator or silencer. Typically, there should be a certain number of duct
diameters (1.5 in. to 2 in.) between the discharge of a fan and the silencer as well as
between the silencer and other duct elements (elbows, etc.) for proper functionality.
A sound trap is typically larger in external dimensions than the duct it is intended to be used
with, since it must incorporate internal sound absorbing material and baffles. Therefore, it can
require an angular duct transition piece at the inlet and outlet of the silencer. The transition
element should not utilize angles greater than 15 degrees when connecting to fan outlet
ducts.
Duct silencers come in many configurations and lengths and their pressure drops vary.
Typically, the smaller the silencer, the greater will be the resulting pressure drop.
Enclosures
When it is not practical to reduce the sound level of certain equipment (pumps, compressors,
etc.), the next best approach is to consider building a sound isolating enclosure around the
sound source or adding an acoustical type of barrier between the sound source and the area
affected. Normally, conventional drywall construction on studs with insulating material
between the two inner surfaces of the drywall, will handle the majority of equipment noise
problems. In some of the more severe instances, it may be necessary to use two layers of
drywall on each side of the studs.
Aside from the obvious access considerations when enclosing equipment in this manner, the
enclosure will have maximum effectiveness if ample space exists between the inner wall of
the enclosure and the equipment. This obviously results in a larger enclosure, but enables
the enclosure to be more effective at absorbing the sound energy.
This results in a cancellation type of effect that can dramatically decrease or almost eliminate
the offensive sound that location. Figure 21 shows an active sound attenuation application.
With reference to Figure 21, note that the sound source can be anything, although
attenuating fan sound, particularly because of the low frequency components, is a most
common HVAC application.
The principle of the attenuation system is rather straightforward. The source input
microphone is located in the area where the offensive sound is present. The control unit
creates a near mirror image output signal of the sound sensed by the input microphone, but
180 degrees out of phase with the sound waves of the offensive sound. The control unit
amplifies the output signal to nearly match the strength of the offensive sound, and the output
speaker produces a sound that cancels much of the audible source sound. An error input
microphone picks up the remaining audible sound and enables the control unit to further
modify the output signal as may be required, to more nearly cancel the offensive sound at the
location where it is desired to have the maximum attenuation.
The advantage of this type of approach is that no significant change in the existing HVAC
ductwork is normally needed, and the resulting sound is almost free of the most annoying
components such as the low frequency tones.
Active sound attenuation systems are best at attenuating the difficult low frequency sounds
from 250 Hz and lower, but are limited at higher frequencies. Thus, if the sound is generally
loud over the entire octave range, full range (broadband) attenuation may need to include
some passive attenuators to reduce the higher frequency sounds (500 Hz and up).
Using active sound attenuation is advantageous to fan sound on large existing HVAC
systems where it may not be possible or practical to change fans or make major changes to
the existing ductwork. However, if air terminal unit sound is the major problem, it may be
more cost effective to replace the terminals or add passive attenuation at those specific
locations.
A sound level meter should offer separate dB readings (octave band filters) for each of the
eight8 octave bands (63, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 Hz). It is even more
desirable if the meter can also provide a 31 Hz octave band reading.
Record the dB level at all octave bands when taking data. (Use the Sound Measurement
form provided in the Appendix of this document to record sound level data.).
Use masking tape of other suitable means to mark or record the exact location of the meter
and tripod if they must be removed from the room, so that measurements taken at another
time will be consistent with the original measurement conditions.
• NC Curve
• RC Curve
NC Curve
RC Curve
This approach is typically used to measure ambient sound levels in conjunction with
compliance with allowable noise exposure limit regulations. However, using the A-Weighted
approach is not recommended for analyzing lower sound levels for the purpose of achieving
a proper balanced room ambient sound level.
anechoic termination
A device used in acoustical laboratories at the end of a test duct in conjunction with
determining certified sound power ratings for HVAC equipment. The anechoic termination
prevents excessive end reflection of the sound waves back into the test duct where they
would interfere with the waves generated by the piece of equipment being tested. Also see
End Reflection.
acoustics
The science of sound, its measurement and its control.
acoustical louver
A specific type of louver used in air transfer openings between rooms to reduce sound
transmission through the louver.
airborne sound
Sound waves that travel through the atmosphere as opposed to sound that travel through
elements of a building structure (such as, pipes, beams, walls, floors, etc.).
attenuate, attenuation
To decrease the sound power level resulting in a lower sound pressure level at the point of
concern. Also see insertion loss.
background sound
Sound from sources other than the one being measured or analyzed. In a room being
analyzed for HVAC sound, background sound may typically include cooling fans on electronic
equipment, copy machines, conversation, and even outside sources such as traffic, etc.)
broadband sound
Sound that is composed of frequencies covering much of the entire audible range as
opposed to tonal sounds that are composed of a narrow frequency range.
decibel (dB)
When used in conjunction with acoustics, it’s an expression of the relative strength or
intensity of the sound power level or sound pressure level. The unit is based upon the
logarithmic scale so that a 50 dB sound power level actually represents an energy level that
is 100 times greater than that of a 30 dB sound power level.
dosimeter
An instrument for registering the occurrence and cumulative duration of sound that exceeds a
predetermined level at a specific location. A Dosimeter is most typically used when analyzing
an area with regard to ensuring compliance with allowable noise exposure limit regulations.
end reflection
The return of sound power energy back into a duct system when the duct ends abruptly or
undergoes an abrupt change in area. When end reflection occurs, the sound pressure level is
reduced in the area that the duct serves. Thus, when a duct terminates at a room diffuser,
end reflection will cause a reduction of the sound power that would otherwise enter the room.
frequency
When applied to sound, it’s the number of complete pressure wave fluctuations per second.
The measurement unit is cycles per second called Hertz (Hz). Human hearing allows us the
hear sound within the range of about 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz.
insertion loss
The reduction in sound power level due to the physical ability of something to absorb or
dissipate sound power. Also see attenuation.
octave band
A limited range of sound frequencies for the purpose of acoustical measurement and
analysis. To reduce the amount of individual frequencies that need to be measured when
analyzing a sound source, the 20,HZ to 20,000,Hz frequency range of human hearing is
divided up into what’s referred to as standard octave bands. These bands are used by
virtually everyone in the industry for consistency in specifying sound power levels and
measuring sound pressure levels. The standard bands are identified by their mid frequency:
16, 31.5, 63, 125, 250, 500, 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 Hz. The bands have been selected so
that each band covers the frequency range where its lowest frequency is one half of its
uppermost frequency. Thus, the 125 Hz band covers from 84 to 167 Hz, while the 250 Hz
octave band covers from 167 to 334 Hz.
sone
A linear unit of loudness as experienced by the human ear at a frequency of 1,000 Hz.
sound masking
Sometimes also called white noise. It is the intentional addition of a background sound that
tends to provide just enough broadband intensity to cover background sounds. In office
environments, a well designed HVAC system provides sufficient sound masking due to its
sound. The background sound used for sound masking should ideally not be noticeable
when present, and must not be at an objectionable level (too loud) or have identifiable tones.
room effect
The reduction in the effect of the sound power level emitted to a room. Room effect has the
potential for lowering sound pressure level measured at a given point as the total size of the
room increases, and with the room’s ability to absorb sound due to furnishings, wall
coverings, sound treatment, etc.
125-1929
Copyright © 2009 Siemens Building Technologies, Inc.
Country of Origin: US
www.sbt.siemens.com