U.8. G?
aS RIOT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT of TENN.
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 1
NASHVILLE DIVISION DEC 2 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
No. 3 , I ~-00 3'7, / D17PUTYGL ~4t
V. )
18 U.S.C. § 1347
18 U.S.C. § 1956
18 U.S.C. § 1957
21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)
SAMSON ORUSA ) 21 U.S.C. § 856(a)(1)
INDICTMENT
COUNT ONE
THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:
At all times material to this Indictment:
A. Orusa's Medical Practice
1. SAMSON ORUSA was a medical doctor licensed by the Tennessee Board of
Medicine, with license number 0000028275, Drug Enforcement Administration registration
number B04959889, and Tennessee Board of Health Pain Clinic certificate number 246.
SAMSON ORUSA operated a medical practice located in Clarksville, Tennessee.
2. SAMSON ORUSA accepted cash paying patients and insurance patients, including
private insurance and public insurance, such as Medicare and Medicaid.
3. SAMSON ORUSA provided medical treatment to a variety of patients, including
those who sought treatment for chronic pain. SAMSON ORUSA prescribed oxycodone to most
of his patients. Oxycodone is a narcotic analgesic that is similar to morphine. It is a Schedule II
controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Abuse of Schedule II controlled
substances can lead to severe psychological or physical dependence. Oxycodone is an opioid used
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 3
to treat severe pain, and even if taken as prescribed, can cause psychological and physical
dependence, and if abused can cause death. Oxycodone pills have a "street value" of roughly one
dollar per milligram.
B. Medicare Health Insurance Program
4. The United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services ("CMS"), was an agency of the United States that administered the
Medicare and Medicaid programs. Medicare was a federally funded health insurance program that
provided insurance coverage for persons aged 65 or over and to persons under the age of 65 who
are entitled to benefits due to disability. Medicare was a "health care benefit program" as defined
by Title 18, United States Code, Section 24(b).
5. Typically, a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in a Medicare Part D plan would fill
their prescription at a pharmacy utilizing their Medicare Part D plan coverage to pay for the
prescription. The pharmacy would then submit the prescription claim for reimbursement to the
Medicare Part D beneficiary's plan for payment under the beneficiary's Health Insurance Claim
Number and/or Medicare Plan identification number.
6. Medicare prohibited payment for items and services that were not "reasonable and
necessary" for the diagnosis and treatment of an illness or injury. Medicare claim forms, for
example, required the provider who made a claim for services to certify that the services were
"medically indicated and necessary for the health of the patient."
7. Federal regulations also required that health care practitioners provide services that
are of a quality that meets professionally recognized standards of health care; and were supported
by evidence of medical necessity and quality in such form and fashion and at such time as may
I 12/12/18 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 4
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed
reasonably be required by a reviewing peer review organization in the exercise of its duties and
responsibilities.
C. The Claims Process
8. Medical providers and health care benefit programs utilized well-known and
standard insurance processing codes to identify the service provider, the medical diagnoses, and
the medical treatments or procedures rendered to a patient.
9. Each licensed medical provider, such as a physician, physician's assistant, or nurse
practitioner had a unique code called a National Provider Identifier ("NPI"). With the NPI number,
a health care provider could enroll with CMS to become eligible to bill Medicare for services
rendered to covered beneficiaries.
10. SAMSON ORUSA was authorized as a health care provider qualified by Medicare
and other health insurance programs to submit bills for medical services he provided to the
programs' beneficiaries. SAMSON ORUSA signed an enrollment form agreeing, among other
things, that he would be responsible for all Medicare claims submitted by himself, or by his
employees or agents. SAMSON ORUSA further agreed, among other things, that he would
"submit claims that were accurate, complete, and truthful" and that the filing of such claims
constituted "an assurance by the provider that services were performed as billed."
11. Medical providers commonly recorded diagnosis and procedure codes on a form
referred to as a "superbill" during the course of the examination of a patient or the performance of
a medical procedure.
12. Medical providers often recorded the data from the superbill onto a standard claim
form known as the CMS 1500 form, which the medical provider would send to the patient's health
care benefit program, or the data from which the medical provider would submit electronically to
3 12/12/18 Page 3 of 19 PageID #: 5
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed
the patient's health care benefit program for payment. Whether submitted in paper form or
electronically, the health care benefit program relied on such information in evaluating the claims
for payment. SAMSON ORUSA personally prepared the superbills relating to his insurance
patients.
13. When each claim was submitted for payment, SAMSON ORUSA certified to the
health care benefit program that (1) the services shown on the form were medically indicated and
necessary for the health of the patient, and (2) were personally furnished by SAMSON ORUSA.
14. To identify services provided to Medicare beneficiaries, SAMSON ORUSA was
required to use five-digit identifying codes published annually by the American Medical
Association in a manual called the Physician's Current Procedural Terminology, which, along with
the identifying codes, or "CPT codes," contained a description of procedures and services.
15. Medicare Part B allowed coverage and payment for evaluation and management
services (hereinafter "office visits") provided to established patients in a physician's office. Each
CPT code reflected a certain level of complexity and reimbursement rate. The more complex the
office visit, the higher the rate of reimbursement for the provider.
16. Office visits were billed under, among others, CPT codes 99211, 99212, 99213,
99214, and 99215:
a. Level One: 99211 was an office or other outpatient visit that, among other things,
typically involves five minutes of the physician's time to perform or supervise the
performance of Level One services.
b. Level Two: 99212 was an office or other outpatient visit that, among other things,
typically involves ten minutes of the physician's time face-to-face with the patient
and/or family.
H 12/12/18 Page 4 of 19 PageID #: 6
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed
c. Level Three: 99213 was an office or other outpatient visit that, among other things,
typically involves fifteen minutes of the physician's time face-to-face with the
patient and/or family.
d. Level Four: 99214 was an office or other outpatient visit that, among other things,
typically involves twenty-five minutes of the physician's time face-to-face with the
patient and/or family. The CPT manual provides that a doctor should only bill for
CPT code 99214 if in connection with the visit of an established patient, the doctor
performed at least two of the following three components: a detailed history, a
detailed examination, or medical decision-making of moderate complexity.
e. Level Five: 99215 was an office or other outpatient visit that, among other things,
typically involves forty minutes of the physician's time face-to-face with the patient
and/or family. This code was appropriate for the most complex office visits and
may have been used to bill for services provided to an established patient when a
physician spent increased face-to-face time with a patient and performed at least
two of the following three components: a detailed history, a detailed examination,
or medical decision-making of high complexity.
17. Medicare regulations also required health care providers and physicians to maintain
complete and accurate patient medical records reflecting the medical assessment and diagnoses of
their patients, as well as records documenting actual treatment of the patients to whom services
were provided and for whom claims for payment were submitted. Medicare requireed complete
and accurate patient medical records so that Medicare can verify that the services were provided
as described on the claim form. These records were required to be sufficient to permit Medicare,
through its contractors, to review the appropriateness of Medicare payments made to the health
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed
5 12/12/18 Page 5 of 19 PageID #: 7
care provider.
18. The health care benefit programs relied on the physician's certification, the
diagnosis codes and the procedure codes, and only provided payment on claims if the services
were medically reasonable and necessary and either personally furnished by the physician or under
his immediate personal supervision.
19. Medicare would pay only for services that were actually performed.
D. Manner and Means
20. Beginning not later than January 1, 2014, and continuing thereafter until September
6, 2018, in the Middle District of Tennessee, SAMSON ORUSA did knowingly open, use, and
maintain his medical practice at 261 Stonecrossing Drive, Clarksville, Tennessee, for the purpose
of distributing Schedule II controlled substances, not for legitimate medical purposes in the usual
course of professional medical practice and beyond the bounds of medical practice.
21. SAMSON ORUSA opened, used, and maintained his medical practice for the
purpose of distributing oxycodone not for legitimate medical purposes in the usual course of
professional medical practice and beyond the bounds of medical practice, including in the
following ways:
a. On or about February 4, 2015, Patient M.H. first visited SAMSON ORUSA.
SAMSON ORUSA diagnosed Patient M.H. with "Chronic Pain Syndrome,"
without attempting to diagnose a specific pain etiology. At the time of Patient
M.H.'s final encounter, SAMSON ORUSA prescribed Patient M.H. oxycodone
(an opioid), oxymorphone (an opioid), Soma (carisoprodol, a muscle relaxer), and
alprazolam (benzodiazepine, an anti-anxiety drug). This drug regimen is commonly
referred to as "The Holy Trinity," and is considered to be a potentially deadly drug
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed
0 12/12/18 Page 6 of 19 PageID #: 8
cocktail. On or about February 24, 2018, Patient M.H, died of alprazolam,
oxymorphone, meprobamate intoxication.
b. On or about May 20, 2016, SAMSON ORUSA prescribed oxycodone to Patient
L.A. This was Patient L.A.'s initial visit with SAMSON ORUSA. She reported to
him that she had not been taking prescription medications "because she had been
without a doctor." However, her initial toxicology screen was positive for
oxycodone, benzodiazepines, and marijuana.
c. On or about September 6, 2016, Patient M.P. first visited SAMSON ORUSA. At
this initial encounter, SAMSON ORUSA noted "I need dismissal, records, X-ray,
MRI from Dr. M" (herein redacted), but then went on to prescribe oxycodone on
that date. Thereafter, SAMSON ORUSA prescribed oxycodone and other
Schedule II controlled substances without obtaining Patient M.P.'s prior medical
history, and without performing a credible physical examination or diagnostic
workup. On or about April 17, 2018, Patient M.P. suffered a heroin overdose in the
waiting room of SAMSON ORUSA's medical office.
d. On or about September 16, 2016, SAMSON ORUSA prescribed oxycodone to
Patient M.W., whom SAMSON ORUSA knew had tested positive on or about
August 23, 2016, for heroin metabolite and negative for prescribed alprazolam. On
or about May 2, 2017, SAMSON ORUSA again prescribed oxycodone to Patient
M.W., who then tested negative on or about May 8, 2017, for all prescribed
medications, including oxycodone.
e. On or about May 12, 2017, SAMSON ORUSA prescribed oxycodone to Patient
D.C., whom SAMSON ORUSA knew had tested positive for cocaine and
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed
7 12/12/18 Page 7 of 19 PageID #: 9
marijuana on or about October 2, 2016, and tested negative for prescribed
oxycodone on April 17, 2017.
f. On or about June 23, 2017, Patient M.S. first visited SAMSON ORUSA after
having been discharged from a pain management practice for testing positive for
cocaine, and for having submitted a falsified drug screen. SAMSON ORUSA
identified Patient M.S. as "high risk," but nevertheless prescribed Schedule II
controlled substances without comment in Patient M. S.'s chart. On or about
September 13, 2017, Patient M.S. provided an "all negative" urine drug screen, but
continued to receive Schedule II controlled substances prescribed by SAMSON
ORUSA.
g. On or about October 18, 2017, SAMSON ORUSA prescribed oxyco done to Patient
C.R. without having seen Patient C.R. on that date, and then documented in Patient
C.R.'s chart that he had in fact conducted a physical examination on that date.
22. Between July 1, 2018, and August 21, 2018, SAMSON ORUSA wrote
approximately 2,494 prescriptions for Schedule II controlled substances.
23. As far back as 2013, and continuing in 2014, and in 2016, the Tennessee
Department of Health's auditing of SAMSON ORUSA's pain management certificates identified
regulatory defects in his practice which went uncorrected, including failure to document treatment
options, failure to conduct controlled substance monitoring after starting a course of opioid
treatment, and failure to establish patient drug screen compliance. On September 14, 2018, the
state permanently revoked SAMSON ORUSA's pain management certificate. On that same day,
SAMSON ORUSA wrote approximately 164 individual prescriptions for approximately 12,754
Schedule II controlled substance pills.
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 FiledE'~ 12/12/18 Page 8 of 19 PageID #: 10
24. As far back as 2014, and continuing through September 2018, several pharmacies
in Montgomery County, Tennessee stopped honoring SAMSON ORUSA's prescriptions for
Schedule II controlled substances.
All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 856(a)(1).
COUNTS TWO THROUGH TWENTY-THREE
THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES:
1. The allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 24 of COUNT ONE are
incorporated and re-alleged as if fully set forth herein.
2. Beginning not later than January 1, 2014, and continuing thereafter until September
6, 2018, including on or about the dates identified in the chart below, in the Middle District of
Tennessee, SAMSON ORUSA did knowingly and intentionally distribute oxycodone, a Schedule
II controlled substance, as identified in the chart below, not for legitimate medical purposes in the
usual course of professional medical practice and beyond the bounds of medical practice:
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed
0 12/12/18 Page 9 of 19 PageID #: 11
Count Patient Date RX Controlled Prescriber Pharmacy
Written Substance DEA # RX #
2 B.S. 4/12/2017 oxycodone BO4959889 2217777
3 C.R. 11/20/2017 oxycodone BO4959889 218686
4 M.H. 2/16/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 258611
5 R.P. 2/23/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 217494
6 K.C. 3/12/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 1011502
7 M.P. 3/16/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 55524
8 M. S. 4/10/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 7963485
9 J.T. 4/27/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 44872
10 M.B. 8/10/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 32208
11 M.C. 8/13/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 271531
12 G.D. 8/15/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 7974009
13 D.B. 8/20/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 236101
14 L.A. 8/21/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 272105
15 M.M. 8/21/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 7974466
16 J.M. 8/24/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 273689
17 J.W. 8/24/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 6053309
18 C.F. 8/24/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 62467
19 D.C. 8/27/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 272513
20 S.B. 8/28/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 272692
21 M.W. 8/29/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 272731
22 B.C. 8/29/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 7975325
23 W.A. 9/5/2018 oxycodone BO4959889 6053557
All in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1).
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed
1012/12/18 Page 10 of 19 PageID #: 12
COUNTS TWENTY-FOUR THROUGH THIRTY-SIX
THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES:
1. The allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 24 of COUNT ONE are
incorporated and re-alleged as if fully set forth herein.
A. Oiusa's Scheme
2. Beginning not later than January 1, 2014, and continuing thereafter until
September 6, 2018, in the Middle District of Tennessee and elsewhere, SAMSON ORUSA
devised and participated in a scheme and artifice to defraud health insurance benefit programs,
including Medicare.
3. It was a purpose of the scheme and artifice to defraud for SAMSON ORUSA to
unlawfully enrich himself and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury by, among other
things: (a) submitting reimbursement claims to Medicare that were "up-coded," that is, submitting
claims that indicated the provision of a higher level of service than actually performed; (b)
submitting false and fraudulent claims to Medicare for services that were medically unnecessary
and that were, therefore, not eligible for reimbursement; (c) causing claims to be submitted to
Medicare for prescriptions that were issued in violation of law or otherwise outside the bounds of
accepted medical practice; and (d) diverting proceeds of the fraud.
4. It was part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that SAMSON ORUSA would
accept 50, 60, or even more patients for office visits in a single day.
5. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that SAMSON ORUSA
would submit, and cause others known and unknown to the Grand Jury to submit, to Medicare
false and fraudulent reimbursement claims for physician services and office visits that were
medically unnecessary and not provided in the manner required by established billing and medical
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 11 of 19 PageID #: 13
11
guidelines, on behalf of numerous Medicare beneficiaries, including Patient J.M., Patient M.M.,
Patient D.B., Patient K.C., Patient R.P., Patient J.M.M., Patient J.T., Patient B.S., and Patient
G.D.
6. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that SAMSON ORUSA,
would require insurance patients, including Medicare beneficiaries, to visit his office
approximately four to six tunes in a single month in order to increase and inflate reimbursement
claims. Cash paying patients, however, were only required to visit SAMSON ORUSA's office
twice per month.
7. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that SAMSON ORUSA,
and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, would require insurance patients, including
Medicare beneficiaries, to accept injections, in order to increase and inflate reimbursement claims.
SAMSON ORUSA would and did threaten to withhold pain management prescriptions from
insurance patients who refused the injections. Cash paying patients, however, generally were not
required to accept injections in order to receive pain management prescriptions.
8. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that SAMSON ORUSA,
and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, would submit reimbursement claims indicating
that SAMSON ORUSA provided office visits and services to Medicare beneficiaries in a single
day in excess of a 24 hours, including office visits and services billed for the following dates:
October 17, 2017; October 18, 2017; November 13, 2017; December 4, 2017; January 5, 2018;
January 8, 2018; January 10, 2018; February 5, 2018; and March 30, 2018.
9. It was further part of the scheme and artifice to defraud that SAMSON ORUSA
would enter into patient files, and cause others known and unknown to the Grand Jury to enter into
patient files, inconsistent, false, and rote information in order to create documentation supporting
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 12 of 19 PageID #: 14
12
the reimbursement claims submitted to Medicare and other insurance benefit programs.
B. The Offenses
10. Beginning not later than January 1, 2014, and continuing thereafter until
September 6, 2018, in the Middle District of Tennessee and elsewhere, SAMSON ORUSA, did
knowingly and willfully execute and attempt to execute, a scheme and artifice to defraud health
care benefit programs, including Medicare, and to obtain by means of materially false and
fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, money and property owned by and under the
custody and control of health care benefit programs, including Medicare, in connection with the
delivery of and payment for health care benefits, items, and services, to wit: SAMSON ORUSA
submitted and caused to be submitted to Medicare reimbursement claims for which he falsely
represented that he provided certain office visits and medical services in the manner consistent
with billing and medical guidelines, as follows:
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 13 of 19 PageID #: 15
13
Count Date of Service Claim Submission Patient CPT Code Amount
Date
24 4/10/2017 4/11/2017 B.S. 99215 $150.00
25 4/11/2017 4/12/2017 B. S.- 99214 $100.00
26 4/12/2017 4/13/2017 B. S. 99214 $100.00
27 10/17/2017 10/19/2018 M.M. 99214 $100.00
28 10/17/2017 10/23/2017 R.P. 99214 $100.00
29 10/18/2017 10/23/2017 J.T. 99214 $100.00
30 10/18/2017 10/09/2018 J.M. 99214 $100.00
31 10/18/2017 10/09/2018 M.M. 99214 $100.00
32 10/18/2017 10/23/2017 R.P. 99214 $100.00
33 11/03/2017 11/06/2017 R.P. 99214 $100.00
34 11/03/2017 10/11/2018 J.M. 99215 $150.00
35 11/13/2017 1/08/2018 M.M. 99215 $150.00
36 11/13/2017 11/15/2017 D.B. 99214 $100.00
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1347.
COUNTS THIRTY-SEVEN THROUGH FORTY-THREE
THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES:
1. The allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 24 of COUNT ONE and
Paragraphs 2 through 10 of COUNTS TWENTY-FOUR THROUGH THIRTY-SIX are
incorporated and re-alleged as if fully set forth herein.
2. On or about the dates set forth below with respect to each count, in the Middle
District of Tennessee and elsewhere, SAMSON ORUSA, did knowingly conduct and attempt to
conduct a financial transaction affecting interstate commerce as described below, which involved
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 14 of 19 PageID #: 16
14
the proceeds of a specified unlawful activity, namely, maintaining a drug-involved premises, in
violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 856; unlawful distribution of a controlled
substance prescribed outside the bounds of professional medical practice, in violation of Title 21,
United States Code, Section 841; and health care fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States
Code, Section 1347, and knowing that the transaction was designed in whole and in part to
conceal and disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, and control of the proceeds of said
specified unlawful activity, while knowing that the property involved in the financial transaction,
represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity:
Count Approximate Description Source Amount
Transaction Date
37 September 6, 2016 Wire transfer from SAMSON Clinic $9,000
ORUSA's account *6106 to proceeds
foreign account *3160
38 September 9, 2016 Wire transfer from SAMSON Clinic $9,000
ORUSA's account *6106 to proceeds
foreign account *3160
39 September 13, 2016 Wire transfer from SAMSON Clinic $9,000
ORUSA's account *6106 to proceeds
foreign account *3160
40 February 2, 2017 Wire transfer from SAMSON Clinic $8,900
ORUSA's account *7606 to proceeds
foreign account *3160
41 February 2, 2017 Wire transfer from SAMSON Clinic $8,900
ORUSA's account *7317 to proceeds
foreign account *3160
42 February 9, 2017 Wire transfer from SAMSON Clinic $8,500
ORUSA's account *7317 to proceeds
foreign account *3160
43 February 9, 2017 Wire transfer from SAMSON Clinic $8,500
ORUSA's account *7606 to proceeds
foreign account *3160
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1)(B)(i).
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 15 of 19 PageID #: 17
15
COUNTS FORTY-FOUR THROUGH FORTY-FIVE
THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES:
1. The allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 24 of COUNT ONE and
Paragraphs 2 through 10 of COUNTS TWENTY-FOUR THROUGH THIRTY-SIX are
incorporated and re-alleged as if fully set forth herein.
2. On or about the dates set forth below with respect to each count, in the Middle
District of Tennessee and elsewhere, SAMSON ORUSA, did knowingly engage and attempt to
engage in the following monetary transactions in criminally derived property of a value greater
than $10,000, affecting interstate commerce and by, through, and to a financial institution,
namely, the transfer and withdrawal of funds by the means set forth below, such property having
been derived from a specified unlawful activity, namely, maintaining a drug-involve premises, in
violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 856; unlawful distribution of a controlled
substance outside the bounds of professional medical practice, in violation of Title 21, United
States Code, Section 841; and health care fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1347:
Count Approximate Description Source Amount
Transaction Date
44 December 15, 2016 Check from BB&T account Clinic $12,451
*2471 toward down payment proceeds
for purchase of 2017 Mercedes-
Benz S 550 4Matic luxury car
45 February 24, 2017 Check from BB&T account Clinic $100,000
*2471 for purchase of proceeds
securities
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957.
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 16 of 19 PageID #: 18
FORFEITURE ALLEGATION
THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES:
1. The allegations contained-in this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by
reference as if fully set forth in support of this forfeiture allegation.
2. Upon conviction of Counts One through Twenty-Three (Maintaining a Drug-
Involved Premises, and Unlawful Distribution of a Controlled Substance Outside the Bounds of
Professional Medical Practice), SAMSON ORUSA shall forfeit to the United States of America,
pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(a):
(A) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the
defendant obtained, directl y or indirectly, as the result of the
offense; and
(B) any of the defendant's property used, or intended to be used, in any
manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of the
offense, including but not limited to the property listed below.
3. Upon conviction of Counts Twenty-Four through Thirty-Six (Health Care Fraud),
SAMSON ORUSA shall forfeit to the United States of America, pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 982(a)(7), property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or
indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense including but not limited
to the property listed below.
4. Upon conviction of Counts Thirty-Seven through Forty-Five (Money Laundering),
SAMSON ORUSA shall forfeit to the United States of America, pursuant to Title 18, United
States Code, Section 982(a)(1): any property, real or personal, involved in such offense, or any
property traceable to such property including but not limited to the property listed below.
5. The property to be forfeited includes the following:
(A) The contents of the following bank, financial, life and annuity accounts:
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 17 of 19 PageID #: 19
17
1) Branch Banking and Trust account number ending in *4834 in the
name of SAMSON ORUSA, M.D. M.D. P.C.;
2) Branch Banking and Trust account number ending in *2471 in the
name of Samson Orusa;
3) Fifth Third Bank account number ending in *7317 in the name of
Samson Orusa;
4) Wells Fargo Bank account number ending in *8727 in the name of
SAMSON ORUSA, M.D.;
5) Citizens Bank account number ending in *965, account holder
Samson Orusa;
6) CUSO Financial Services account number ending in *546 in the
name of Dr. S. Orusa 401K FBO Samson Orusa; and
7) Great West Life & Annuities account number ending in *3355 in the
name of Samson Orusa.
(B) a money judgment as to Counts One through Twenty-Three (Maintaining a
Drug-Involved Premises, and Drug Distribution of a Controlled Substance
Outside the Bounds of Professional Medical Practice) in an amount to be
determined, representing the value of any properly constituting, or derived
from, any proceeds the defendant obtained, directly or indirectly, as the
result of the drug distribution offense; and the value of any of the
defendant's property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to
commit, or to facilitate the commission of the drug trafficking offense.
(C) a money judgment as to Counts Twenty-Four through Thirty-Six (Health
Care Fraud) in an amount to be determined, representing the value of the
property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or
indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the Health
Care Fraud offense
(D) a money judgment as to Counts Thirty-Seven through Forty-Five (Money
Laundering) in an amount to be determined representing the value of any
property, real or personal, involved in such money laundering offense, or
any property traceable to such property.
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 18 of 19 PageID #: 20
SUBSTITUTE PROPERTY
6. If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of
SAMSON ORUSA.:
a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
d. has been substantially diminished in value; or
e. has been commingled with other property that cannot be divided without
difficulty,
the United States shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property, and it is the intent of the
United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any
other property of SAMSON ORUSA up to the value of said property listed above as subject to
forfeiture.
A TRUE BILL
FOREPERSON
DONALD Q. COCHRAN
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
f
STEPHAN N. TOUSSAINT
ASSIST T ITED-TOTES ATT RNEY
MILLER BUSHONG
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTOR~
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3 Filed 12/12/18 Page 19 of 19 PageID #: 21
19
Case 3:18-cr-00342 Document 3-1 Filed 12/12/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 22