,..
Filed
RAJ V. ABHYANKER, California SBN 233284 February 5, 2019
Email: [email protected] Clerk of the Court
2
LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C. Superior Court of CA
3 1580 W. EI Camino Real, Suite 10 County of Santa Clar
Mountain View, CA 94040 17CV305497
4 Telephone: (650) 965-8731 By: svera
Facsimile: (650) 989-2131
5
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
6
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
10
11 LEGALFORCE RAPC Case No.: 17-CV-30S497-JLS
WORLDWIDE, P.C. (formerly RAJ
12 ABHYANKERP.C.), 1PROPOSED~JUDGMENT
13
Plaintiff, Dept.: 1-3- 8
14 Judge: Hon. Judge James L. Stoelk@f
v.
15 Sunil R. Kulkarni
GENEVALAI,
16
Defendant.
17
18
19 WHEREAS on January 11, 2019, Defendant Geneva Lai accepted Plaintiffs Offer to
20 Compromise Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedures § 998 ("Offer") to have judgment
21 entered against her and paid Plaintiff, LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. (formerly Raj
22 Abhyanker, P.C.), in accordance with the Offer. Said Offer is attached hereto
23 as Exhibit A. Defendant and Plaintiff having signed said Offer,
24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
25 1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.
26 ("RAPe"), and against Defendant Geneva Lai ("Ms. Lai") as to RAPC's first cause of action for
27 fraud against Ms. Lai;
28
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
- --- ..I
I
2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor ofRAPC, and against Ms. Lai as to RAPC ' s
2 second cause of action for constructive fraud against Ms. Lai;
3 3. Judgment is hereby entered in favor ofRAPC, and against Ms. Lai as to RAPC 's
4 third cause of action for deceit by concealment against Ms. Lai;
5 4. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of RAPC, and against Ms. Lai as to RAPC' s
6 fourth cause of action for breach of confidence against Ms. Lai;
7 5. Judgment is hereby entered in favor ofRAPC, and against Ms. Lai as to RAPC ' s
8 fifth cause of action for breach of duty of loyalty against Ms. Lai;
9 6. Judgment is hereby entered in favor ofRAPC, and against Ms. Lai as to RAPC ' s
10 sixth cause of action for conspiracy against Ms. Lai;
11 7. Judgment is hereby entered in favor ofRAPC, and against Ms. Lai as to RAPC's
12 seventh cause of action for breach of contract against Ms. Lai.
13
14 February 4, 2019
Dated: - - -, -ze+9-
15 Hon. Judge James L. Stoelker
Judge of the Superior Court
16
Sunil R. Kulkarni
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[pROPOSED] JUDGMENT
