1
EFFECTIVITY OF STRATEGIC INTERVENTION MATERIAL FOCUSED ON
SATURATED AND UNSATURATED SOLUTIONS
TO GRADE 7 SCIENCE STUDENTS
An Action Research
KARL JOSE N. IBARRIENTOS
October 2018
2
Introduction
As a school of thought, pragmatism is primarily anchored in the belief that
learning is best achieved by doing or experience. In the present, Philippine educational
system is greatly influenced by this philosophy as manifested by the integration of
practical activities in the learner’s material to facilitate them in their acquisition of
knowledge pertaining to specific learning competency, particularly in science and
mathematics. Despite the efforts to lead every learning in attaining mastery of learning,
it was found out in the recently concluded first quarterly examination for school year
2018-2019, that Grade 7 science students of Sto. Tomas National High School have
shown low academic performance in one particular learning competency as evidenced
by the recorded frequency of errors (FOE).
Out of 1398 Grade 7 students who took the exam at the same day and at the
same time frame, 879 or 62.92 percent of the students got Item No. 12 wrong. This
item was stipulated in the questionnaire in this manner,
“12. When making a jell-o, you accidentally use twice as much jell-o powder as
the recipe calls for. You stir and stir, but you cannot get all of the jell-o to
dissolve. This is because the solution is?
1. Supersaturated 2. Saturated 3. Unsaturated 4. Concentrated”
The above question was included in the Division Unified Test in Secondary
Science Grade 7 to evaluate the understanding of students in the learning competency
pertaining to the investigation of the properties of saturated and unsaturated solution.
Thus, this is also considered as the least-learned competency for the first quarter of
school year 2018-2019.
3
Moreover, in 2017, it was also reported that the same learning competency was
deemed the least-learned among Grade 7 students in another secondary school within
the municipality of Sto. Tomas.
With this data, it is inevitable that further instructional efforts are required to
address a growing concern on the challenge faced by Grade 7 Science students
towards a particular learning competency, hence, Strategic Intervention Material (SIM)
aimed at assisting low-performing students in enhancing their mastery to the focus
learning competency are developed and introduced.
Corresponding the administration of a Strategic Intervention Material, is the
need to conduct a research to test the effectivity of a learning material. More
specifically, this action research will test the effectivity of the administered Strategic
Intervention Material focused on saturated solution and unsaturated solution to Grade
7 Science students.
Research Questions
This action research would like to answer the following questions:
1. What intervention material should be used in the experiment?
2. Is there a significant difference in the Pre-test scores and Post-test scores
of Grade 7 students who utilized the strategic intervention material?
Research Design
This action research initiated by the researcher to test the effectivity of a crafted
strategic intervention material as an intervention to address the instructional needs of
Grade 7 students towards a least-learned competency, will utilize the Pre-Test Post-
4
Test type of experimental research. This type of research is a quasi-experiment where
participants re studied before and after the experimental manipulation.
Sampling
The participants of this action research were purposefully chosen with the
objective of administering the intervention to students from the section with highest
percentage of frequency of error for Item No. 12. There are 49 students in the section
recorded with highest percentage of error in the abovementioned item. These 49
students were the participants of the research conducted..
Research Instrument
The instrument used is the researcher-made questionnaire based on the least-
learnt competency. The set of questions stipulated in the Pre-test and Post-test are
uniform.
Data Gathering Procedure
The researcher observed the following steps in the conduct of this action
research project:
1. Analysis of Frequency of Error. The researcher utilized data in analyzing
the competency which needs enhancement. The top mean error was
selected as basis for the design of intervention material. The data was
acquired from the frequency of errors recorded per section from the Division
Unified Test in Secondary Science Grade 7
2. Intervention Making. The researcher designed a material to be used in
enhancing the least-learned competency.
5
3. Selection of Participants. Since this is a classroom-based research, the
researcher purposefully chose the section with the highest percentage of
errors for the Item representing the least-learned competency.
4. Administration of Pretest. Pretest was administered to all 49 participants
in order to generate baseline data for analysis.
5. Experimentation. The crafted strategic intervention material which includes
interactive activities was administered to the participants.
6. Administration of Posttest. After the time frame, the students underwent
posttest to see if there were progress in their achievement.
7. Analysis. Data were then tabulated and analyzed using statistical concepts.
Data Analysis
Statistical treatment and tools will be considered, and the use of SPSS 20
software will be of great help in the analysis of the test responses from the participants.
In the light of quantitative data analysis, the following statistical tool will be used:
Paired (Dependent) t-test. This will be used to test the effectiveness of the
strategic intervention material administered to the participants. Paired t-test is used to
test if the means of two paired measurements, such as pretest/posttest scores, are
significantly different.
6
Results and Discussions
This portion presents the results of this research and the answers of the
research questions previously presented.
The Intervention Material
The intervention material used in assisting Grade 7 Science students to
enhance their mastery of the least-learned learning competency includes a guide card
and set of activities crafted based on the properties of saturated and unsaturated
solutions. Please see attached material.
7
The Significant Difference in the Pretest and Posttest Scores
The mean of the pretest and posttest results of the 49 participants are
presented in the table below.
TABLE 1
Mean Score of the Pretest and Posttest Results of Participants
Mean Score Standard Deviation
Pretest 2.7755 1.71106
Posttest 7.4082 1.55347
The mean score of 49 participants to the pretest is only 2.7755 over 10 item
test. Whereas, after the administration of the intervention material, the pretest mean
score was more than doubled in the posttest mean score of 7.4082 over 10 items test.
In addition, Paired t-test was used to test if there is a significant difference
between the score attained by the participants in pretest and posttest, the results are
presented in the table below.
TABLE 2
Paired Differences and t-value
PAIRED DIFFERENCES
Sig (2
Mean Std. Std. Error 95% Confidence t df tailed)
Deviation Mean Interval of the
Difference
Lower Upper
Pair 1 -4.63265 1.76416 0.25202 -5.13938 -4.12593 -18.382 48 0.000
Pretest-Posttest
The pretest score and the posttest score presented in Table 1 has standard
deviation of 1.76426 as shown in Table 2. Using paired sample test of the scores, it
yielded a significant value (p-value) of 0.000, which is less than 0.05, therefore, it can
be concluded that there is a significant difference of means before and after
administering the strategic intervention material. That is, the strategic intervention
material is also effective based on the result of the students’ test.
8
Recommendation
Strategic Intervention Materials (SIM) should be readily available to all schools
and accessible for all teachers and students. As a strategy in facilitating learners in
their acquisition of knowledge towards all learning competencies, SIM must be
integrated in the curriculum to enhance its inclusivity in responding to the diversity of
learners, hence the ultimate goal of Philippine education, “Education for All”.
Future researchers may pursue the same conceptual framework used in this
study, but emphasis will also be given to other factors that may have had effects on a
learner’s mastery of learning, such as age, nutritional status, and reading ability.
To all teachers, it should always be remembered that every learner deserves
quality and excellent education regardless of their background and diversity.
Prepared by:
KARL JOSE N. IBARRIENTOS
Action Researcher
Reviewed by:
REY A. MANGARIN
STNHS Research Coordinator
Noted by:
AILEN G. INOC LOLITA V. NOVELA
Science Coordinator Head Teacher I
Recommending Approval:
DR. ASER M. SAMSONA EVELYN GRACE H. LABASAN
Principal IV Education Program Supervisor-Science