Partial Least Squares Based Structural
Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)
Dr. Hossein Olya
Oxford Brookes University
[Link]
holya@[Link]
CONTENTS
Introduction to SEM
CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM
Various methodological issues
Formative vs. reflective constructs
Evaluation of measurement & structural models
Advanced and innovative analytical approaches
Statistical Methods
Statistical Methods
• With first-generation statistical methods, the general assumption is that the data are
error free.
- Exploratory factor analysis
- Multiple regression
- Path analysis
With second-generation statistical methods, the measurement model
stage attempts to identify the error component of the data.
- SEM
- CB - SEM
- PLS - SEM
• Measurement error
• Types of measurement error
• Random error can affect the reliability of construct
• Systematic error can affect the validity of construct.
• Source of error
• Poorly worded questions in survey
• Incorrect application of statistical methods
• Misunderstanding of scaling approach
Structural equation modeling (SEM)
• Complex models with many associations, incorporate both unobserved (latent)
and observed variables.
• Factor analysis & multiple regressions
• Two SEM approaches
1. Covariance-based SEM (CB-SEM)
2. Variance-Based - VB-SEM/ PLS-SEM.
CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM
• CB-SEM ‘‘reproducing
the covariance matrix,
without focusing on
explained variance’’
• PLS-SEM minimizing
the error terms [and
maximizing] the R2
values of the
endogenous constructs’’
(Hair et al., 2014, p. 14).
Justification for usage of PLS-SEM
prediction and explanation of target constructs.
Smaller sample sizes
Complex models
No data Normality
Support reflective and formative measurement models as well as single item construct.
Weaker theoretical support/ Integration of multiple theories.
Works with ordinal and binary scaled questions.
SEM Software / Applications
CB-SEM PLS-SEM
AMOS SmartPLS
LISREL PLS-Graph
MPLUS PLS-GUI
EQS SPADPLS
SAS LVPLS
R WarpPLS
SEPATH PLS-PM
CALIS semPLS
LISCOMP Visual PLS
Lavaan PLSPath
COSAN XLSTAT
PLS-SEM
A PLS path model consists of two elements:
The structural model displays the relationships (paths) between the constructs.
The measurement models display the relationships between the constructs and
the indicator variables (rectangles).
Reflective vs. Formative
The decision of whether to measure a construct reflectively or formatively is not clear-cut
(Hair et al., 2014).
Reflective: Consequences/trait
Formative: Causes/ Combination
MEASUREMENT MODEL
The goal of reflective measurement model assessment is to
ensure the reliability and validity of the construct measures and
therefore provide support for the suitability of their inclusion in
the path model.
• Reliability is the extent to which an assessment tool produces stable
and consistent results.
• Validity refers to the extent to which the construct measures what it
is supposed to measure.
REFLECTIVE MEASUREMENT MODEL EVALUATION
Internal Consistency Reliability
Composite Reliability (CR> 0.70 - in exploratory research 0.60 to 0.70
is acceptable).
Cronbach’s alpha (α> 0.7 or 0.6)
Indicator reliability (> 0.708)
Squared Loading - the proportion of indicator variance that is
explained by the latent variable
Convergent validity
Average Variance Extracted (AVE>0.5)
Discriminant validity
Fornell-Larcker criterion
Cross Loadings
HTMT Criteria (<1).
Discriminant validity
• Cross-Loadings: An
indicator's outer loadings
on a construct should be
higher than all its cross
loadings with other
constructs.
Discriminate Validity
• Fornell-Larcker criterion: The square root of the AVE of each construct
should be higher than its highest correlation with any other construct.
HTMT<1
FORMATIVE MEASUREMENT MODEL
Formative Measurement Model
Assess Collinearity Among
Indicators (VIF < 3)
Assess the Significance and
relevance of outer weights (T-
Value > 1.645).
The estimated values of outer
weights in formative
measurement models are
frequently smaller than the of
reflective indicators
PLS-SEM Structural Model Evaluation
PLS-SEM relies on a nonparametric bootstrap procedure to test coefficients for
their significance. In bootstrapping, a large number of subsamples (i.e.,
bootstrap samples) are drawn from the original sample with replacement
(random from the sampling population).
ex
R²
en
2. Proposed research model
1. Measurement Model exogenous latent variables (ex)
endogenous latent variable (en)
Mediation analysis
Moderation Analysis
Usage of SEM in Scopus-Indexed Research
Partial Least Squares (PLS) focuses on the prediction of a specific set of hypothesized relationships that
maximizes the explained variance in the dependent variables (Hair, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2011).
Of the articles, 379 utilized CB-SEM and 45 PLS-SEM.
Methodological Issues Ignored in SEM Application
Sample Size
Model Complexity
Prediction-Based Modelling
Data Normality
Formative and Single Item Constructs
Weak Theoretical Support.
Nunkoo, R., Ramkissoon, H., & Gursoy, D. (2013). Olya, H. G., & Altinay, L. (2016). Asymmetric modeling of
Use of structural equation modeling in tourism intention to purchase tourism weather insurance and
research: past, present, and future. Journal of loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2791-2800.
Travel Research, 52(6), 759-771.
2. SEM, fsQCA, NCA
quality
SEM: sufficient antecedent
Sat.
price
fsQCA: sufficient configuration
Casual recipe1: qul*~pri sat
Casual recipe 2: qul*pri sat
NCA: Necessary antecedent or
configuration
qul sat
Pedraja Iglesias & Jesus Yagüe Guillén (2004)
Feedback is welcome
• Hossein GT Olya,
• PhD. of Tourism Management,
• Oxford Brookes Business School
• Oxford Brookes University
• Headington Campus
• Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK.
• Webpage: [Link]
• Email: holya@[Link]
• Methodology Editor, Service Industries Journal (SSCI)
