CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the researcher methodology that will be used in the study.
It contains the following sections. (a) Method of Research (b) Population and Sampling
(c) Respondents (d) Research Instrument (e) Data Gathering Procedure.
Research Method
Quantitative methods emphasize objective measurements and the statistical,
mathematical or numerical analysis of data collected through polls, questionnaires or by
manipulating pre-existing statistical data using computational techniques. Quantitative
research focuses on gathering numerical data and generalizing it across groups of people
or to explain a particular phenomenon.
Population and Sampling
This researcher conducted this study in Sto. Niño De Praga Academy of La Paz
Homes II, Inc. It includes the following grade levels: Grade 7, Grade 8, Grade 9, Grade
10, Grade 11 and Grade 12 as the respondents of this study.
Table of Respondents
The respondents of this study came from the Junior High School Students and
Senior High School Students who were currently enrolled in Sto. Niño De Praga Academy
of La Paz Homes II Inc (SNDPA-LPH). Namely;
Table 1. Breakdown of the possible respondents of the researcher’s study.
Grade Level Projected number Actual Number of Percentage
of respondents Respondents
Grade 7 47 47 23.73%
Grade 8 41 39 19.69%
Grade 9 34 30 15.15%
Grade 10 22 20 10.10%
Grade 11 39 38 19.19%
Grade 12 14 14 7.07%
Total Population 198 188 94. 93%
The Table 1 shows the breakdown of the respondents that take part in this
research study. One Hundred Eighty Eight (188) out of One Hundred Ninety Eight (198)
responded this study.
Research Instrument
The data and the information needed in this study were gathered through the use
of a Self – Made Survey Questionnaire that was made by the researcher. The
Questionnaire focused on the Perception on Contributory Factors of Depression to the
Students in Sto. Niño De Praga Academy of La Paz Homes II Inc. The Questionnaire
were divided in two forms: the first form was intended for the demographic profile of the
respondents ( Form A ); the second form was for the survey questionnaires ( Form B ). In
Form A, the respondents were asked to answer questions about their personal
information such as Name; Age; Gender; Year/Level and in Form B, the respondents
were asked to answer questions related to the focus of the study, the information that was
gathered use to obtain the expected results.
Validation of the Instrument
The instrument to be used was subjected for validation by the experts along the
line of their study as recommended by the school. The said instrument was validated by
Dr. Wilma U. Galicia, the school administrator of Sto. Niño De Praga Academy of La Paz
Homes II, Inc. in Trece Martires City Cavite, and Ms. Juvylyn Dela Cruz. The sample
represented the following categories; Friends, Family, Relationship, Social Media. All
corrections, suggestions, and revisions were incorporated. These were used as bases of
the researcher for improving the instrument for the final version of the questionnaire.
Data Gathering Procedure
To obtain the necessary data and information needed for the study, several steps
were taken. First, a written communication was sent to the office of the principal of the
institution asking permission to distribute the Self-made survey Questionnaires that was
prepared by the researcher to the respondents, which was in this study the junior High
School and High School Students of Sto. Niño De Praga Academy of La Paz Homes II
Inc. Second, the researcher distributed the questionnaires after gaining the approval of
the School Principal. And lastly, the researcher immediately retrieved all the
questionnaires the moment after the respondents finished answering the questions that
was listed.
Statistical Treatment of the Data
Statistical Treatment of Data was essential to the researcher in order to determine
the validity and reliability of his research instruments. Also, these may be used as the
bases for making inferences, interpretations, conclusions or generalizations. The
following statistical tools and procedures were used to analyze and interpret the data
gathered. These tools were used to answer the problems of the study.
Frequency Count.
This statistical tool was used to determine the quantity of responses made by the
respondents to the different questions. This tool was used to answer Problems number
1, and No. 2.
Percentage
This was applied to establish a comparative value of an item to the whole activity
particularly in relation to the profile of the respondents. This tool was used to answer
Problem No. 1, and 2.
Weighted Mean
This was used as the basis of whatever gets the lowest perception on contributory
factor of depression. This tool was used to answer Problem No. 2 and No. 3.
Average Weighted Mean
A statistical tool obtained through adding the weighted mean of every respondent
for each category. This tool was used to answer Problem No. 2 and No. 3.
Ranking
This statistical tool was used to determine the statement who fall in the highest
position. This was used to answer Problem No. 2 and No 3.
Scale
To know Perception on Contributory Factors of Depression to the Students of Sto.
Niño De Praga Academy of La Paz Homes II Inc., the following scales was used by the
researcher. This was used to answer Problem No. 2.
5 – Always
4 – Frequently
3 – Sometimes
2 – Rarely
1 – Never
Likerts Scale
To know the Perception on Contributory Factors of Depression to the Students in
Sto. Niño De Praga Academy of La Paz Homes II Inc., the following scales were used
by the researcher.
4.50 – 5.00 – Highly Affective
3.50 – 4.49 – Affective
2.50 – 3.49 – Moderately Affective
1.50 – 2.49 – Below Inaffective
This statistical tool was used to answer Problem No. 2 and No 3