Sperma Analisis Paper
Sperma Analisis Paper
1
Huntington - Medicina Reprodutiva. São Paulo, Brazil
2
Disciplina de Ginecologia Endocrinológica, Departamento de Ginecologia, Escola Paulista de Medicina da
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP-EPM), São Paulo, Brazil
3
Disciplina de Ginecologia, Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de
São Paulo (FMUSP). São Paulo, Brazil
according to WHO parameters (World Health Organization, remaining cycles, 744 were cancelled, because the embry-
2010). The following four groups were classified according os did not develop until the blastocyst stage (18.7%). The
to semen quality, as per WHO (World Health Organization, cycles with blastocyst formation underwent fresh transfer
2010) criteria: or blastocyst cryopreservation.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of women included in the study, and ovarian stimulation outcomes according to
study groups
Figure 1. Comparison of number of cleaved embryos on D3 (A) and number of blastocyst formed on D5 (B) in
the study groups.
Figure 2. Comparison of (A) cleavage rate (number of cleaved embryos on D3 / number of fertilized) and (B)
blastocyst formation rate (number of blastocysts formed on D5 / number of fertilized) in the study groups
of having at least one blastocyst, despite OR indicating ap- influence (Chen et al., 2009). Moreover, the first proposal of
proximately 35% less possibility, which was similar to the sperm morphology as a predictor of IVF outcomes was by
semen group with severe alteration (Table 2). Kruger et al. (1986) in the 80s, who reported a relationship
between men with an increased proportion of sperm with
DISCUSSION abnormal morphology and decreased likelihood of preg-
nancy. Many studies were subsequently carried out, and
Many studies show contradictory results, and there is
the Kruger morphology criteria has been considered the
no consensus as to which seminal parameter (i.e., con-
main parameter of IVF indication; Kruger's classification
centration, motility or morphology) is best for evaluating
is still used as strict criteria in the manual for semen ex-
sperm potential in IVF. Several authors suggest that severe
amination of the WHO (World Health Organization, 2010).
oligospermia is an important factor, it reduces fertilization
Morphology defects can hide a genetic abnormal condition
potential and embryo quality (Meng et al., 2016); however,
of the sperm cells (Magli et al., 2012). However, the effect
other authors have shown that severe oligospermia has no
Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression model to determine possibility of having at least one blastocyst formed, adjusted
for confounders
Coefficient Standard error of Coefficient p value OR
Women age (years) -0.084 0.012 <0.001 0.919
Number of MII oocytes recovered -0.122 0.024 <0.001 0.885
Number of embryos at cleavage stage (D3) 0.846 0.042 <0.001 2.330
Semen with mild alteration -0.405 0.108 <0.001 0.667
Semen with severe alteration -0.303 0.137 0.027 0.738
Epididymis sperm -0.302 0.230 0.188 0.739
of morphology on the likelihoods of embryo implantation Zheng et al. (2016) demonstrated that a reduced num-
and pregnancy is still contradictory in the literature (De ber of motile spermatozoa diminished fertility and embryo
Vos et al., 2003; Loutradi et al., 2006). Additionally, sever- quality on day 3; however, if there was a good embryo
al authors have recently demonstrated that men present- for transfer, the likelihoods of implantation and pregnancy
ing 0% of normal sperm are still able to obtain natural were similar. Then, it was suggested that the implantation
pregnancy (Kovac et al., 2017). There is a high correlation rate was the important parameter to evaluate the ability
of sperm motility with the capacity of sperm to reach the of an individual embryo to be implanted and it was not
oocyte in a natural conception; thus, sperm selection tech- associated with sperm quality (Zheng et al., 2016). We did
niques are currently used, pushing the sperm to a motility not evaluate the clinical outcomes, which is a limitation of
challenge (swim-up) or forcing them through a differential this study. However, our primary goal was to evaluate the
gradient, aiming to mimic the natural selection character- blastocyst formation rate, which is a parameter of embryo
istics seen in vivo (Sakkas et al., 2015). quality and implantation potential. There was a greater
However, men commonly present not just one alter- likelihood of implantation when the embryo was trans-
ation, but a combination of sperm defects, and it is neces- ferred in the blastocyst stage (Alves da Motta et al., 1998;
sary to consider the three factors together. In our study, Glujovsky et al., 2012; Harton et al., 2013; Kolibianakis et
we classified semen samples into four groups, considering al., 2002; Maheshwari et al., 2016).
all parameters; the presence of three normal parameters The blastocyst formation is also dependent on many
was considered the normal group, and three abnormal pa- other factors, and to analyze whether the association of
rameters or a concentration lower than 5 million sperm/ semen quality and the blastocyst formation was indepen-
ml was considered a severe alteration. Other levels of al- dent of oocyte/female factors, we built a multiple logistic
teration in one or two semen parameters were considered regression model adjusted for maternal age, number of
mild alterations. Epididymis sperm was considered in an MII oocytes recovered and number of cleaved embryos.
individual group. This approach allowed for a broad view of Considering that normal semen does not influence the
the semen quality and male reproductive potential. presence or absence of one formed blastocyst (dependent
We considered the hypothesis that in ICSI cycles where variable), patients classified as mild alteration or severe
one spermatozoa with better quality parameters is chosen alteration had a significantly lower likelihood of having a
and injected in the oocyte, the intrinsic quality is still af- blastocyst (50% and 35% less chance, respectively), inde-
fected by the general semen quality, and it is impossible to pendent of oocyte/female factors.
tell the best spermatozoa based on the genetic information We did not find a significant association of epididymis
alone. Therefore, the potential of embryo development is sperm with blastocyst formation, which may be due to a
also affected (Zheng et al., 2016). Based on the group smaller number of cycles included in this group compared
classifications, we evaluated the effects of semen quality to the other groups. However, the effects of epididymal
on blastocyst development in a large cohort of patients/ sperm on IVF outcomes is still controversial in the litera-
oocytes. ture (Aboulghar et al., 1997; Meniru et al., 1998; Nicop-
Our findings showed that the lower the semen quality, oullos et al., 2004).
the lower the blastocyst formation rate. However, despite Notably, the logistic regression model also showed that
the statistically significant decrease in blastocyst forma- the number of cleaved embryos is a significant predictor
tion, the clinical relevance is small as the difference be- of having a blastocyst at the end of the cycle. Our results
tween the higher (normal semen group=44.2%) and low- suggest that poor semen quality decreases the chance
er (epididymis group=35.5%) blastocyst formation rates of having a blastocyst, despite of univariate analysis had
is less than 10%. Also, the difference between the mean shown a numerically similar blastocyst formation rates. Ac-
number of blastocysts formed is only 0.4 (normal semen cordingly, the worse the semen quality, the more cleaved
group=2.8 and epididymis group=2.4). embryos are required for blastocyst formation. Future
Studies published more than 2 decades ago report that studies should be performed to establish the better meth-
both diminished sperm morphology quality and concen- od for embryo transfer, considering both semen quality and
tration lower the likelihood of good morphology embryo number of cleaved embryos.
formation. However, those semen parameters were evalu- In summary, we suggest that the general sperm quali-
ated separately, and the embryos were classified based on ty, considering the three main parameters of concentration,
cleavage stage (Parinaud et al., 1993). We also noticed the motility and morphology, can predict the blastocyst forma-
cleavage rate, and the differences follow the same pattern tion rate. Hence, it is essential to consider the general semen
that blastocysts have; as there is a statistical difference quality and number of cleaved embryos in counselling couples
but it is not clinically relevant. undergoing IVF with extended culture to blastocyst transfer.
Kovac JR, Smith RP, Cajipe M, Lamb DJ, Lipshultz LI. Men
Alves da Motta EL, Alegretti JR, Baracat EC, Olive D, Seraf-
with a complete absence of normal sperm morphology ex-
ini PC. High implantation and pregnancy rates with transfer
hibit high rates of success without assisted reproduction.
of human blastocysts developed in preimplantation stage
Asian J Androl. 2017;19:39-42. PMID: 27751992 DOI:
one and blastocyst media. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:659-63.
10.4103/1008-682X.189211
PMID: 9797094 DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00263-5
De Vos A, Van De Velde H, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devro- Magli MC, Crippa A, Muzii L, Boudjema E, Capoti A, Scara-
ey P, Van Steirteghem A. Influence of individual sperm velli G, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L. Head birefringence proper-
morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and ties are associated with acrosome reaction, sperm motility
pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injec- and morphology. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24:352-9.
tion. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:42-8. PMID: 12524062 DOI: PMID: 22285248 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.013
10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04571-5
Maheshwari A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Should we be
Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, School- promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage? Reprod
craft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and preg- Biomed Online. 2016;32:142-6. PMID: 26673100 DOI:
nancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.016
Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155-8. PMID: 10856474 DOI:
10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00518-5
Meng XQ, Gong Y, Huang J, Zeng YM, Quan S, Zhong Y.
[Impact of sperm midpiece morphology on embryo de-
Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleav- velopment following intracytoplasmic morphologically se-
age stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in lected sperm injection]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao.
assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database 2016;36:255-9. Chinese. PMID:26922026
Syst Rev. 2012;(7):CD002118. PMID: 22786480 DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub4
Meniru GI, Gorgy A, Batha S, Clarke RJ, Podsiadly BT, Sakkas D, Ramalingam M, Garrido N, Barratt CL. Sperm
Craft IL. Studies of percutaneous epididymal sperm aspi- selection in natural conception: what can we learn from
ration (PESA) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Mother Nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes?
Reprod Update. 1998;4:57-71. PMID: 9622413 DOI: Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:711-26. PMID: 26386468
10.1093/humupd/4.1.57 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv042
Nicopoullos JD, Gilling-Smith C, Almeida PA, Nor- World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the
man-Taylor J, Grace I, Ramsay JW. Use of surgical examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Ge-
sperm retrieval in azoospermic men: a meta-analysis. neva: World Health Organization; 2010.
Fertil Steril. 2004;82:691-701. PMID: 15374716 DOI:
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.116 Yan J, Wu K, Tang R, Ding L, Chen ZJ. Effect of mater-
nal age on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization and em-
Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Preg- bryo transfer (IVF-ET). Sci China Life Sci. 2012;55:694-8.
nancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single sper- PMID: 22932885 DOI: 10.1007/s11427-012-4357-0
matozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340:17-8. PMID:
1351601 DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92425-F Zheng J, Lu Y, Qu X, Wang P, Zhao L, Gao M, Shi H, Jin
X. Decreased Sperm Motility Retarded ICSI Fertilization
Parinaud J, Mieusset R, Vieitez G, Labal B, Richoil- Rate in Severe Oligozoospermia but Good-Quality Embryo
ley G. Influence of sperm parameters on embryo quali- Transfer Had Achieved the Prospective Clinical Outcomes.
ty. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:888-92. PMID: 8224276 DOI: PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163524. PMID: 27661081 DOI:
10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56292-X 10.1371/journal.pone.0163524