THESIS
THESIS
Introduction
In the world we all know that all most of the people have an affinity for
sweets. It is common to give in to our cravings to satisfy our own sweet tooth.
There are arrays of sugar filled products that can do the job, from pastries to
candies to chocolates.
Even fruit can defined sweet there are some fruits that sweet such as
liqueur, but may include coffee, cheeses, nuts, or other savory items. ... Some
cultures sweeten foods that are more commonly savory to create desserts.
of carabao (water buffalo) milk formed into small cylinders like shape, it is
Most notably used as an ingredient in haluhalo. It’s the fairly small jellybean-
shaped nut or seed of the sugar palm tree, which of course grows in
the Philippines.
Background of the Study
tablets” or “milk pills” which basically describes this Filipino sweet delicacy.
Pastillas de leche are sweet milk candies made out of carabao (water buffalo)
sugar during the cooking process. This sweet confectionary can be found in
in San Miguel Bulacan where sweets like this is an industry and a main source
of income. This is made from evaporated milk with some added ingridients to
make it like a dough. The dough will be formed into small shape and be coated
with sugar.
feather palm native to tropical Asia, from eastern India east to Malaysia,
Indonesia, and the Philippines in the east.Common names include sugar palm,
grows annual pseudostems about a meter tall bearing narrow leaf blades. The
inflorescences bear pale yellow with purple flowers and arise directly from the
also belong turmeric, cardamom, and galangal. Ginger originated in the tropical
rainforests from the Indian subcontinent to Southern Asia where ginger plants
feather palm native to tropical Asia, from eastern India east to Malaysia,
Indonesia, and the Philippines in the east.Common names include sugar palm,
flowering plant whose rhizome, ginger root or ginger, is widely used as a spice
pseudostems about a meter tall bearing narrow leaf blades. The inflorescences
bear pale yellow with purple flowers and arise directly from the rhizome on
from the Indian subcontinent to Southern Asia where ginger plants show
Conceptual Framework
The Independent Variable shows the procedure in making the product,
Frame 1 Frame 2
Figure 1. Research Paradigm
following questions:
as:
2.1 Taste?
2.2 Aroma?
2.3 Texture?
2.4 Appearance?
3.1 Students;
3.2 Faculty;
Research Hypothesis
by the respondents.
Hypothesis
and appearance.
Kaong Pastillas using fruits and later finds the indication of acceptability in
National High School, Sta. Cruz Lagunaduring academic year 2018-2019. (The
Significance of study
following
Future Researcher this study will help them to gather some information so
Student this study will help the student to have an idea through self-discovery
and encourage them to find out something new from the resources that were
Parents this study will help parents to have an extra income for their family
and also it helps them to produce new flavor or variety of dessert for their
family.
Teacher for them to be able to try some new type of candy and to know the
Definition of Terms
of the study.
flavors.
Chapter 2
Related Literature
Appearance
determined by its color, shape and its design and presentation. Candy items
were generally decorated well for enhancing their desirability for consumption.
beverage influences crave ability and acceptance, before the product ever
Taste
Food-Easy Comforts (2012) state that the taste must be the first
frontier, our tongue, our throats, reacting to the flavor that our taste bud
encounter.
popsicles than a good, zesty orange gummy. Taste buds so named because
the arrangement of their cells was similar to the shape of the flower located
there were really only basic flavors salty, sour, sweet, and bitter. There were
so many nuances gradation, combination, fusion that very from dish to dish,
De Torres Jr., et.al (2012) stated that texture refers to the physical
quality if surface.
vegetables lose water during storage they will or lose their turgor pressure,
Aroma
Bacer and Cortwz (2008) conducted the study “Kalamansi Nuts into
aroma flavor.
Anoneuvo, C. (2012), her study about “Saba Yema”, she found out that
Appearance
appearance ten (10) or fifty percent (50%) out of twenty (20) respondents
found out that 40% of her respondents said that was “Highly Acceptable” and
accepted with the average weighted means of 3.42 which was interpreted as
Taste
Yema” show that their end-product is highly accepted by the respondents with
Pastillas” and stated on the findings that the finished product was “Highly
the findings that the taste was “accepted”by the respondents with the average
that seventy five percent (75%) of the respondents rated the test as highly
Texture
Molina (2008), in his study about “Sweet Potato Craker” the texture
eighty percent (80%) of them rated ”excellent ” three (3) or fifteen percent (15)
rated “very good” and one (1) or five percent (5%) rated as “good”
Dilaw (Zinggeber officen alce) Candy” the findings were proven “Highly
can be made into yema, it stated that the product was evaluated by the
Candy”, finds that the 60% of the respondents rated it “Excellent” which
stated on the findingsthat the aroma of the finished product was rated by the
respondents as acceptable.
(Lacuma Nervosa) Pastillas” and stated on the findings that the aroma of the
finished product was “highly acceptable” with the average weighted mean of
4.63.
Research Methodology
This chapter present the research design, subject of the study, population and
data.
Research Design
methods. The finished product obtained from the method adopted was subject
for acceptability test and analysis on its sensory qualities such as appearance,
University.
explained the product and how to evaluate it. Each respondents received a
piece of Ginger Kaong Pastillas to taste it together with the questionnaire for
Ingredients Measurement
Sugar ¼ kilo
Table 1 show the ingredients and measurements in preparing Ginger
condensed milk, and powdered milk. It was inferred from the said table that
there was no significant different between unit cost and total cost showing
Toolsand Equipment
Table 2 shows the tools and equipment and its function. Casserole
used in cooking the Ginger Kaong Pastillas; mixing bowl used as a container
for washing the Ginger and Kaong and also for mixing ingredients; weighing
scale used for measure the largest amount of all ingredients; and the wooden
Production Procedure
Ginger kaong can be made into Pastillas by using the following method
and procedure.
4. Put the powder milk and condensed and the powder ginger mix well until it
becomes.
results.
On the first trial, less boiled the kaong so the researcher do more time
to boiled kaong.
On the second trial, it did not have the exact taste of ginger so the
pastillas. The time allocation in preparing the product is also reflected in the
table.
Boiling
Slicing
Mixing
Mashing
Packaging
Table 4 show the activities done in order to make pastillas and the time
Cost of Production
Cost of analysis was made to find out if the experimental product met
Total 88
Research Instrument
Rating Scale:
5- Strongly Agree
4- Agree
3- Moderately Agree
2- Fairly Agree
1-Not Agree
Statistical Treatment
Formula:
F= Frequency
S= Scale
N= Sample size.
√Σ(𝑥−𝑥)2
sd=
𝑛−1
Where:
∑= Summation
N= Number of respondents
X= Mean
Chapter 4
from the Grade 10 students in Pedro Guevara Memorial National High School
Table 5.
3.41-4.20 Satisfied
2.26-3.40 Neutral
1.81-2.25 Unsatisfied
Question 2: It can
attract pastillas lovers. 0.88
4.03
question no.1 the standard deviation is0.71,and the mean is3.66, which means
they are satisfied. In question number 2 the standard deviation is0.88and the
mean is 4.03, which means they are satisfied. In question number 3 the
standard deviation is0.97 and the mean is 3.76, which means they are satisfied.
In question number 4 the standard deviation is 0.86 and the mean is 3.93, which
Question 1: Ginger
kaongpastillas is
acceptable in terms of 0.64 4.16
aroma.
Question 3: The
product is pleasant in
its appetizing scent. 0.67 4.4
Question 4: The
product is fascinating 0.77 4.13
because of its delicious
and attractive smell.
number 1 the standard deviation is0.64, and the mean is4.16, which means
they are satisfied. In question number 2, the standard deviation is0.79, and the
mean is4.16, which means they are satisfied. In question number 3, the
standard deviation is 0.67, and the mean is 4.4, which means they are satisfied.
In question number 4, the standard deviation is 0.77, and the mean is 4.13,
Question 1: Ginger
kaongpastillas is
acceptable in terms of 0.77 4.23
texture.
Question 2: The
product has a good
texture. 0.80 4.1
number 1 the standard deviation is0.77, and the mean is 4.23, which means
they are very satisfied. In question number 2, the standard deviation is 0.80,
and the mean is 4.1, which means they are satisfied. In question number 3 the
standard deviation is 1.05 and the mean is4which means they are satisfied in
its desired texture. In question number 4 the standard deviation is0.9and the
Question 1: Ginger
kaongpastillas has an
after taste effect. 0.73 4.2
Question 2: Ginger
kaongpastillas has a
unique taste. 0.81 4.1
number 1 the standard deviation is 0.73, and the mean 4.2, which means they
are satisfied. In question number 2, the standard deviation is0.81, and the
mean is 4.1, which means they are satisfied. In question number 3 the standard
deviation is 0.78, and the mean is3.9, which means they are satisfied in its
desire taste. In question number 4 the standard deviation is 0.92, and the mean
Chapter 5
Summary
its sensory qualities such as taste, texture, aroma, and appearance? (3) Is
rated by respodents?
The experimental method of research was used to determine the
sensory qualities.
Findings
Conclusion
Recommendation
1. Parents can have substitute for commercial candies.
students.
3. Further the researcher may make other food products out of kaong
Appendices
Apperance
Respondents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 mean
1 3 3 2 3 2.75
2 3 3 3 2 2.75
3 2 3 3 2 2.5
4 4 5 3 3 3.75
5 4 5 4 4 4.25
6 5 5 5 5 5
7 5 5 5 4 4.75
8 4 5 4 4 4.25
9 4 5 5 4 4.5
10 4 4 5 3 4
11 4 5 3 3 3.75
12 4 3 3 4 3.5
13 4 4 3 3 3.5
14 4 3 5 5 4.25
15 3 3 3 4 3.25
16 3 4 3 5 3.75
17 3 4 4 4 3.75
18 3 2 4 4 3.25
19 4 4 4 4 4
20 5 4 4 5 4.5
21 4 5 3 4 4
22 3 4 5 5 4.25
23 3 5 5 5 4.5
24 4 4 5 5 4.5
25 3 3 3 3 3
26 4 5 3 4 4
27 3 4 5 5 4.25
28 4 5 3 4 4
29 4 3 4 4 3.75
30 3 4 2 4 3.25
3.66667 4.03333 3.76667 3.93333 3.85 mean
SD 0.71116 0.88992 0.97143 0.86834 0.61798 sd
Apperance mean sd remarks
Q1 3.66 0.71 accepted
Q2 4.03 0.88 accepted
Q3 3.76 0.97 accepted
Q4 3.93 0.86 accepted
Taste
Respondents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 mean
1 4 4 4 4 4
2 4 3 3 3 3.25
3 3 2 3 3 2.75
4 5 4 4 5 4.5
5 5 5 5 5 5
6 5 5 5 5 5
7 5 5 4 5 4.75
8 5 5 4 4 4.5
9 5 5 5 5 5
10 5 5 4 4 4.5
11 4 5 3 4 4
12 4 4 4 4 4
13 5 5 4 4 4.5
14 5 5 5 5 5
15 5 5 3 4 4.25
16 4 3 3 5 3.75
17 5 4 4 5 4.5
18 4 3 5 4 4
19 4 4 4 4 4
20 4 4 4 5 4.25
21 5 4 3 2 3.5
22 5 4 5 3 4.25
23 4 4 5 3 4
24 4 4 3 3 3.5
25 3 3 4 4 3.5
26 3 4 4 2 3.25
27 3 3 3 3 3
28 4 5 3 3 3.75
29 3 4 3 4 3.5
30 4 4 5 3 4
4.26667 4.13333 3.93333 3.9 4.05833 mean
SD 0.73968 0.81931 0.78492 0.92289 0.60772 sd
Taste mean sd remarks Texture
Q1 4.26 0.73 highly accepted Q1
Q2 4.13 0.81 accepted Q2
Q3 3.93 0.78 accepted Q3
Q4 3.9 0.92 accepted Q4
Aroma
Respondents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 mean
1 4 5 5 4 4.5
2 5 5 5 5 5
3 5 5 5 4 4.75
4 3 5 3 5 4
5 4 4 5 5 4.5
6 4 4 4 4 4
7 3 5 4 3 3.75
8 4 5 5 4 4.5
9 4 5 5 4 4.5
10 4 4 5 4 4.25
11 4 5 5 3 4.25
12 4 4 5 5 4.5
13 4 3 4 5 4
14 5 4 5 4 4.5
15 4 4 5 5 4.5
16 5 5 4 5 4.75
17 5 5 4 4 4.5
18 5 4 4 4 4.25
19 5 4 5 5 4.75
20 5 5 5 5 5
21 4 5 5 5 4.75
22 4 3 4 3 3.5
23 3 3 3 3 3
24 4 4 4 3 3.75
25 4 3 3 4 3.5
26 4 3 4 3 3.5
27 4 4 4 4 4
28 5 4 4 5 4.5
29 4 3 5 4 4
30 3 3 4 3 3.25
4.16667 4.16667 4.4 4.13333 4.21667 mean
SD 0.64772 0.79148 0.67466 0.77608 0.51584 sd
Aroma mean sd remarks
Q1 4.16 0.64 accepted
Q2 4.16 0.79 accepted
Q3 4.4 0.67 accepted
Q4 4.13 0.77 accepted
Texture
Respondents Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 mean
1 5 5 5 5 5
2 5 5 5 4 4.75
3 4 3 3 4 3.5
4 4 3 3 3 3.25
5 3 4 2 3 3
6 5 5 4 5 4.75
7 4 5 5 5 4.75
8 5 4 5 5 4.75
9 5 5 5 5 5
10 5 5 5 3 4.5
11 5 5 5 5 5
12 5 4 5 4 4.5
13 5 4 4 3 4
14 5 5 5 4 4.75
15 5 4 5 4 4.5
16 4 4 3 5 4
17 3 2 1 2 2
18 4 3 3 4 3.5
19 5 4 4 5 4.5
20 3 4 4 3 3.5
21 4 4 4 3 3.75
22 4 4 5 5 4.5
23 4 4 4 3 3.75
24 5 5 4 4 4.5
25 3 3 3 3 3
26 4 5 3 4 4
27 3 4 4 3 3.5
28 4 3 4 5 4
29 4 4 5 5 4.5
30 3 4 3 3 3.25
4.23333 4.1 4 3.96667 4.075 mean
SD 0.77385 0.80301 1.05045 0.92786 0.73447 sd
Texture mean sd remarks
Q1 4.23 0.77 highly accepted
Q2 4.1 0.8 accepted
Q3 4 1.05 accepted
Q4 3.96 0.92 accepted
Bibliography
:10,1111/j.1745-4514
Corp.
Cruz, Laguna
Substance Revision
Cruz Laguna
2012
(2009)
Cruz L aguna
University of Memphus.
Cruz Laguna
Van Loey (2015) “Optimizing Thermal Process for canned White Beans in
doi:10>1111/j:1365