0% found this document useful (0 votes)
503 views37 pages

CDHydro - CDTECH PDF

Uploaded by

VuToanThang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
503 views37 pages

CDHydro - CDTECH PDF

Uploaded by

VuToanThang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

Ultra Low Sulfur Gasoline

via Commercially Proven


Catalytic Distillation
Gasoline Desulfurization Requirements
- Pool sulfur specification
- Europe
European Union
50 ppm max - 2005
10 ppm max
- available 2005
- standard 2008
- US, Canada
30 ppm avg - 2002 to 2008
- Future
15 -10 -5 ppm? - 2005+
- México
300 / 500 ppm max (150 avg) - 2004
80 ppm max (30 avg) - 2006 / 2008
Modern Refinery Requirements

• Maximize refinery margin


• Minimize refinery downtime/shutdown costs
• Minimum FCC turnaround cycle – 5 years
• Avoid any FCC downstream shutdowns
- Choose FCC gasoline HDS technology wisely
FCC Gasoline Feed Composition

12000 40
10000
30
Sulfur, ppm

Olefins, %
8000
6000 20
4000
10
2000
0 0
50 100 150 200 250
Temperature, C

Sulfur Olefins
Optimized FCC Gasoline HDS

Mild HDS
LCN

Medium
MCN
HDS
FCC C5+
GASOLINE

MCN/HCN

HCN
Severe
HDS
Conventional FCC LCN Treating

FRESH CAUSTIC • Fractionate LCN from FCC


LCN
Mercaptan Gasoline
Removal
• Caustic wash for mercaptan
Selective
TREATED
LCN removal
Hydrogenation - ~90% effective

FCC C5+
Hydrogen • Selective hydrogenation of
GASOLINE
Compression
HYDROGEN dienes for alky/ethers
SPENT CAUSTIC
• Compression of makeup
MCN/HCN
hydrogen
Hydrogenation/Distillation

CDHydro® Process
• Replace trays with CW
Vent
structured distillation Gas

packing containing
catalyst
• Add Hydrogen Feed Hydrogen Treated
Distillate

• Vent excess Hydrogen Hydrocarbon


Steam
Feed

Bottoms
Catalytic Distillation

Catalyst Section
Drawing

Reflux LCN

Catalyst
Wire
Mesh

LCN
RSH
Sulfides
Dienes
Hydrogen

RSH + Diene ⇒ Sulfide⇓


Improved LCN Treating

• Replace upper section with FRESH CAUSTIC


CDHydro (5-7 barg) CDHydro
Mercaptan
Removal
• Eliminate fresh caustic and
TREATED
caustic wash LCN
Selective
- < 1 ppm RSH HYDROGEN Hydrogenation

• Eliminate separate
FCC C5+
hydrogenation unit GASOLINE
Hydrogen
Compression
HYDROGEN
• Eliminate hydrogen SPENT CAUSTIC

compression MCN/HCN

• Boost octane via


hydroisomerization
Conventional Optimized FCC Gasoline HDS

Mild HDS
LCN

Medium
MCN
HDS
FCC C5+
GASOLINE

MCN/HCN

HCN
Severe
HDS
Optimized FCC Gasoline HDS

LCN

CDHydro® Medium
Hydrogen
MCN
HDS
FCC C5+
GASOLINE

MCN/HCN

HCN
Severe
HDS
MCN/HCN Desulfurization

CDHDS®
Conditions milder than conventional fixed
CW Off Gas
bed (17 barg vs 28+)
> 99.5% HDS
Heavy sulfur to bottom
Light olefins to top FCC C7+
Gasoline
Min octane loss
Low H2 consumption
Low sulfur bottoms product good for
gasoline or diesel Hydrogen

No yield loss due to cracking


No makeup compressor Desulfurized
No mid-cycle shutdown for catalyst regen FCC C7+ Gasoline

No feed storage required


CD Optimized FCC Gasoline HDS

LCN

CDHydro®
Hydrogen
MCN
FCC C5+
GASOLINE
MCN/HCN
CDHDS®
Hydrogen
HCN
CDTECH FCC Gasoline Desulfurization Operating Experience

Shell Martinez, California Depentanizer LCN CDHydro September-95


Pennzoil Shrevesport, Louisiana Depentanizer LCN CDHydro April-97
Shell Port Arthur, Texas Dehexanizer HCN CDHDS May-00
Irving Oil St. John, New Brunswick, Can. Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro November-00
Irving Oil St. John, New Brunswick, Can. Splitter HCN CDHDS November-00
Veba Oel Gelsenkirchen, Germany Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro October-00
ChevronTexaco Pembroke, UK Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro January-00
ChevronTexaco Pembroke, UK Splitter HCN CDHDS January-00
PetroChina Nanchong, China Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro January-00
Motiva Port Arthur, Texas Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro February-03
Motiva Port Arthur, Texas Splitter HCN CDHDS February-03
Hellenic Aspropyrgos, Greece Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro September-03
Motiva Convent, Louisiana Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro October-03
Motiva Convent, Louisiana Splitter HCN CDHDS October-03
Valero Texas City, Texas Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro November-03
Valero Texas City, Texas Splitter HCN CDHDS November-03
Equilon Puget Sound, WA Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro November-03
Equilon Puget Sound, WA Splitter HCN CDHDS November-03
Motiva Norco, Louisiana Dehexanizer LCN CDHydro January-04
Motiva Norco, Louisiana Splitter HCN CDHDS January-04

21 Units with greater than 45 years total operation


Why does CDTECH have less octane
loss for a given olefin reduction?
CDHDS Selectivity Comparison
MCN/HCN Feed

1
Conversion, Fraction

0.8

0.6
0.4

0.2

0
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Temperature, F

Sulfur reduction Olefin reduction

Olefin saturation is higher for heavy olefins


Conventional Fixed Bed Reactor
Selectivity Comparison

100.00%
Conversion, Fraction

80.00%

60.00%
40.00%

20.00%

0.00%
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Temperature, F

Sulfur reduction Olefin reduction

Olefin saturation is higher for light olefins


Heavy Olefins Have Less Octane loss

RON Linear Olefin - RON Linear Saturate

120

100
80
RON

60

40

20
0
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Carbon Number
Why is CDTECH’s octane loss lower?
Answer:

• Conventional fixed bed hydrotreaters


- Saturate primarily light olefins
- Light olefin saturation causes high octane loss
• CDHDS
- Higher saturation of heavy olefins
- Less octane to lose in heavy olefins
- Lower octane loss at a given olefin reduction
Why Does CDTECH Claim Longer
Catalyst Life?
• Conventional fixed bed hydrotreaters
- Olefins form oligomers
- Oligomers form coke that fouls catalyst
- Catalyst activity reduced
- Regenerate or replace catalyst
• CDHydro/CDHDS
- Olefins form oligomers
- Oligomers removed by distillation
- Catalyst stays clean
- Replace catalyst at end of FCC cycle (5 years)
- No mid FCC cycle shutdown required
Commercial Catalyst Activity for FCC Gasoline HDS

Conventional
Fixed Bed
Technology
SOR

0 EOR 365 730

Days on Oil
Fixed Bed HDS
Catalyst Activity Tracker for the Motiva, Port Arthur CDHDS Units
CD TECH - Confidential

1.8
1.6 ate !!
Observed Rate Const.

1.4 Upd
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
3/15/00 10/1/00 4/19/01 11/5/01 5/24/02 12/10/02 6/28/03 1/14/04 8/1/04
Date
K pod CDHDS1 K pod CDHDS2
An approach used by others
Wet
treatment
LCN

FCC

HCN Diene Fixed-bed


Wet
Treater treatment
An approach used by others
Wet
treatment
LCN

FCC

HCN Diene Fixed-bed


Wet
Treater treatment

CDTECH has lower capital cost


Long CDTECH Catalyst Cycle
Reduces Capex
• Conventional Fixed Bed HDS
- Feed diene removal required
- Mid FCC cycle catalyst regeneration/replacement
- Shutdown FCC or store HDS feed
• CDHydro/CDHDS
- No feed diene removal required
- No shutdown during FCC cycle
- No FCC shutdown
- No additional storage tanks
- No additional capex required
FCC Gasoline HDS Commercial Status
• CDHydro
- 12 commercial units in operation
- 5 years guaranteed catalyst life
• CDHDS
- 7 commercial units in operation
- Motiva, Port Arthur (expanded)
- Irving Oil, Saint John, NB
- ChevronTexaco, Pembroke, UK
- Motiva, Convent
- SOPUS, Puget Sound
- Valero
- 5 years guaranteed catalyst life
Motiva Port Arthur CDHDS
Phase 1
12,000 BPD HCN
90% HDS
Phase 2
- Tier II - 30 ppm S
- ~50,000 BPD FRCN
- New CDHydro
- Additional CDHDS
- Future 10 ppm S
capability
- Demo 1400 ppm
to <8ppm
Irving Oil Limited CDHydro/CDHDS

• Saint John, New Brunswick


Canada
• 58,000 BPD RFCC gasoline
• November 2000 start up
- < 1 month to acceptance
- 150 ppm pool
- 2 years ahead of regulations
• 2002
- 30 ppm pool
- 3 years ahead of regulations
Texaco

• Pembroke, UK
• 50,000 BPD full range
FCC gasoline
• 1st CDHydro/CDHDS
in Europe
• 1Q02 start up
- UK ULSG supported
by tax incentive
Equilon/Motiva/Deer Park Refining

• 7 refineries
• 275,000 bpd FCC gasoline capacity
• CDHydro and/or CDHDS
• Start-up 2002 - 2004
Valero Refining

• 5(+2) refineries
• World Fuels Today statement by Valero V.P.
- For grassroots units, CDTECH has:
- Lowest capital cost
- Lowest octane loss
- Lowest hydrogen consumption
PetroChina Announcement – 05/03/2003

• 2002 World Oil Industry Top Ten Technology


Breakthroughs
- 9 upstream technologies
- 1 downstream technology
- CDTECH’s CDHydro/CDHDS
FCC gasoline desulfurization
Conclusions
• CDHydro
- Lowest sulfur and diolefins in LCN
- Eliminates separate mercaptan and diolefin removal units
- Boosts octane
• CDHDS
- Lowest olefin loss via HDS
- No diene pretreatment required
- No regeneration/feed storage required
• CDHydro/CDHDS
- Commercially proven
- Most cost effective HDS in FR FCC CN
- Long catalyst life via catalytic distillation
- Only HDS technology to provide 5 year life
- Low capital cost
Q&A

You might also like