M 452 Content
M 452 Content
Case A Insert
Gear-1 rotation speed, N1 = 800 rpm
Gear-1 number of teeth, T1 = 20 -
Gear-2 number of teeth, T2 = 40 -
Calculate
Speed ratio: Gear-1 / Gear-2, R12 = T1 / T2
= 0.5 -
Gear-2 rotation speed, N2 = N1 * R12
= 400 rpm
Cases B & C Insert
Gear-1 rotation speed, N1 = 400 rpm
Gear-1 number of teeth, T1 = 40 -
Gear-2 number of teeth, T2 = 20 -
Gear-3 number of teeth, T3 = 60 -
Gear-4 number of teeth, T4 = 30 -
Calculate
Speed ratio: Gear-1 / Gear-2, R12 = T1 / T2
=2 -
Gear-2 rotation speed, N2 = N1 / R1
= 200 rpm
Speed ratio: Gear-3 / Gear-4, R34 = T3 / T4
= 2.000 -
Speed ratio: Gear-1 / Gear-4, R14 = R12*R34
= (T1/T2)*(T3/T4)
=4 -
Gear-4 rotation speed, N4 = N1 / R14
= 1600 rpm
SHAFT FORCES
Design of Power Transmission Shafting
The objective is to calculate the shaft size having the strength and rigidity required to
transmit an applied torque. The strength in torsion, of shafts made of ductile materials are
usually calculated on the basis of the maximum shear theory.
ASME Code states that for shaft made of a specified ASTM steel:
Ss(allowable) = 30% of Sy but not over 18% of Sult for shafts without keyways. These
values are to be reduced by 25% if the shafts have keyways.
Shaft design includes the determination of shaft diameter having the strength and rigidity to
transmit motor or engine power under various operating conditions. Shafts are usually round
and may be solid or hollow.
The ASME Code equation for shafts subjected to: torsion, bending, axial load, shock, and
fatigue is:
Shaft diameter cubed,
D^3 = (16/π*Ss(1-K^4))*[ ( (KbMb + (α*Fα*D*(1+K^2)/8 ]^2 + (Kt*T)^2 ]^0.5
Input shaft data for your problem below and Excel will calculate the answers, Excel's
"Goal Seek" may be used to optimize theShaft
Solid design of shafts, see the Math Tools tab
below. Input
Torsion, T = 360 in-lbf
Round solid shaft diameter, D = 2.000 in
Calculation
Section polar moment of inertia, J = π*D^4 / 32
= 1.571 in^4
Torsion stress, Ft = T*(D/2) / J
= 229 lb/in^2
Input
Motor power, HP = 2.0 hp
Shaft speed, N = 1,180 rpm
Pinion number of teeth, t = 20 -
Gear number of teeth, T = 60 -
Bevel pinion diametral pitch, DP = 8 Whole Number
Gear and pinion pressure angle, PA = 20.0 deg
Gearbox allowable overhung load, Wa = 500 lb
Overhung load location, x = 4.000 in
Gearbox efficiency, e = 90.0% -
Driver shaft diameter, d1 = 1.500 in
Driven shaft diameter, d2 = 2.500 in
Torque shock & fatigue factor, Kt = 3 -
Shaft outside diameter, D = 1.500 in
Shaft inside diameter, d = 1.000 in
Shaft length, L = 5.000 in
Shaft allowable tension stress, St = 26,000 psi
Shaft allowable shear stress, Ss = 10,000 psi
Calculation
Driver gear pitch circle diameter, D1 = t / DP
2.500 in
Driven gear pitch circle diameter, D2 = T / DP
7.500 in
Driver Shaft Torque, Q1 = e*12*Kt*5252*HP / N
= 288 in-lb
Driven Shaft Torque, Q2 = Q1*D2 / D1
= 865 in-lb
Bevel gear tangential force, Ft = Q1 / (PCDp/2)
= 231 lb
Bevel gear separating force, Fr = Ft *TAN(PA/57.3)
4.027
Driver applied overhung load, W = S = Q1*D1 / 2
= 361 lb
Driver Shaft maximum Moment, M = W*x
= 1442 in-lb
Shaft section modulus, I = π*(D^4 - d1^4) / 64
= 0.1994 in^4
Moment tension stress at A, sm = M*(D/2) / I
= 5,424 psi
Shaft polar modulus, J = π*(D^4 - d1^4) / 32
= 0.3868
Torsion shear stress at A, st = Q1*(D/2) / J
= 559 psi
Resultant moment & torsion stress at A, sr = (sm^2 + st^2)^(1/2)
= 5,452 psi
Resultant moment & torsion stress at B, = Resultant moment & torsion stress at A
Safety Factors
Driver tension safety factor, SFt = St / sr
= 4.8
Driver shear safety factor, SFs = Ss / ss
= 17.9
Driver overhung load safety factor, SFo = Wa/W
= 1.39
Gear Forces
Bevel Pinion or Gear Data Input
Whole Numbers
Motor power, HP = 7.5 hp
Shaft speed, N = 1,750 rpm
Torque shock & fatigue factor, Kt = 2.0
Bevel pinion number of teeth, t = 20
Bevel gear number of teeth, T = 40
Bevel pinion diametral pitch, PD = 6 Whole Number
Gear and pinion pressure angle, PA = 20.0 deg
Calculation
Bevel pinion pitch circle diameter, PCDp = t / DP
= 3.333 in
Bevel gear pitch circle diameter, PCDg = T / DP
= 6.667 in
Driver Shaft Torque, Q1 = Kt *5252*HP / N
= 45.0 ft-lb
= 540 in-lb
Driven Shaft Torque, Q2 = T1 *PCDg / PCDp
= 1080
Pinion pitch cone angle, B = 57.3 *ATAN(t / T)
= 26.57 deg
Bevel gear tangential force, Ft = Q1 / (PCDp/2)
= 324 lb
Bevel gear separating force, Fr = Ft *TAN(PA/57.3)
= 118.0 lb
Fp = Fr *SIN(B/57.3)
= 52.8 lb
Fg = Fr *COS(B/57.3)
= 105.5 lb
END OF WORKSHEET
DISCLAIMER: The materials contained in the online course are not intended as a
representation or warranty on the part of PDH Center or any other
person/organization named herein. The materials are for general information only.
They are not a substitute for competent professional advice. Application of this
information to a specific project should be reviewed by a registered architect and/or
professional engineer/surveyor. Anyone making use of the information set forth
herein does so at their own risk and assumes any and all resulting liability arising
therefrom.
1. easier to read.
2. better recall from archives.
3. greater accuracy.
4. faster with repeat use.
5. graphs are created automatically.
6. numerous useful formulas.
7. "Goal Seek" enables optimization.
8. solve equations with, "Solver".
9. solve sets of linear and non-linear equations.
10. calculations and graphs may be pasted into
documents and slide show presentations.
Manual Transmission Video
[Link]
GEARBOX EFICIENCY
Most gearmotor manufacturers (Dodge, SEW-Eurodrive,
Nord, Falk, etc) will list "generalized" efficiencies for a particular
type of gearing configuration.
For example, helical gears = 0.96, worm gears = .85.
Most manufacturers will specify an intended gearbox
operating point.
Gearbox efficiencies in a spur gearbox at a 16-mm (5/8-in)
diameter vary from about 87% at a gear ratio of 6.3:1 to about 40% at
a ratio of 10,683:1.
A basic rule that designers use for spur gears is a 10% loss
per engagement.
One gear wheel in contact with another is defined as an
engagement and the loss in that engagement is approximately 10%.
A general rule is the lighter the load and the higher the ratio, the less
likely it is that the gearbox will actually reach the manufacturers'
specified efficiency. Light loading and
high ratios tend to produce poor gearbox efficiencies.
But with heavy loading and
high ratios, the gearbox will approach its theoretical efficiency.
Overall system efficiencies depend on the efficiency of the motor and
gearbox together. If
the efficiency of the motor and gearbox is each 50%, the two
efficiencies are multiplied together to yield the system efficiency (0.5
x 0.5 or 0.25, or a system efficiency of 25%).
likely it is that the gearbox will actually reach the manufacturers'
specified efficiency. Light loading and
high ratios tend to produce poor gearbox efficiencies.
But with heavy loading and
high ratios, the gearbox will approach its theoretical efficiency.
Overall system efficiencies depend on the efficiency of the motor and
gearbox together. If
the efficiency of the motor and gearbox is each 50%, the two
efficiencies are multiplied together to yield the system efficiency (0.5
x 0.5 or 0.25, or a system efficiency of 25%).
At low ratios, motors are more heavily loaded than the gearboxes. A
low reduction ratio lets the motor "see" more of the load than at a
high ratio.
For example, the maximum efficiency of a 22:1 gearbox is about 76%
and the maximum efficiency of the motor is about 80%. However, the
two don't occur at the same time. When the motor reaches its peak
efficiency, gearbox efficiency is closer to 63% instead of 74%.
Therefore, when the motor is
at peak efficiency the gearbox is not — in low ratios.
This is a critical issue.
Assuming the gearbox has a constant efficiency leads to incorrect
calculations. In this case, a 10% efficiency difference could mean a lot
in the overall system efficiency. At
higher gearbox ratios, motor and gearbox efficiencies follow similar
curves because at that point the gearbox sees more of the load than
does the motor. This
leads to peak efficiencies in both gearbox and motor.
Variable motor speeds present another set of variables in the overall
equation. However, at
about 150:1 to 200:1, the gearbox and motor efficiencies peak at the
same time. To use the least
amount of power, it's critical to match the motor, gearbox, and load
closely to get the best system efficiencies.
[Link]
1_gearboxefficiencies_md.pdf
GEAR SPREADSHEET ANALYSIS-CONTENT
Copy write, © Gear Spreadsheet Analysis by John R Andrew, 25 Oct 2012
[Link]
GEAR FORCES
When using Excel's Goal Seek, unprotect the spread sheet by selecting:
Drop down menu: Tools > Protection > Unprotect Sheet > OK
When Excel's Goal Seek is not needed, restore protection with:
Drop down menu: Tools > Protection > Protect Sheet > OK
Mpa
Input Data
Shaft material yield stress, Sy = 36000 psi 248 Mpa
Shaft material ultimate stress, Su = 62000 psi 427 Mpa
EXAMPLE ONLY
SPUR GEAR FORCES Input Data
Motor power, P = 10 hp
Shaft speed, N = 1750 rpm
Moment factor, Cm = 1.5
Torque factor, Ct = 2.0
Spur gear pitch circle diameter, D = 10.000 in
Gear pressure angle, A = 20 deg
Calculations
Motor torque, T = Kb*Kt*12*5252*HP / N
= 1080 in-lbs
Gear pitch circle radius, R = D / 2
= 5.000 in
Tangential force, Ft = T / R in-lbs
Ft = 216 lbs
Radial force, Fr = Ft * Tan A in-lbs
Fr = 79 lbs
[Link]
2. Static stress concentration factors are applied to the above static stresses.
Static stress concentration factor (Kt) for the round shaft above in bending:
Input Data
Larger diameter, D = 4.000 in
Smaller diameter, d = 3.331 in
Notch radius, r = 0.250 in
Calculation
D/d = 1.20
Input Data From Table
Enter value from table above, A = 0.97098
Enter value from table above, b = -0.21796
Calculation
Kt = A *(r / d)^b
Answer: Kt = 1.71
Kt is the stress concentration factor (Kt) in static bending.
Input Data
Calculated nominal direct stress, σ = 24000 psi
Static notch concentration factor, Kt = 1.98
Calculation
Calculated max direct stress, σ = Kt*σ
σ = 47520 psi
When using Excel's Goal Seek, unprotect the spread sheet by selecting:
Drop down menu: Tools > Protection > Unprotect Sheet > OK
When Excel's Goal Seek is not needed, restore protection with:
Drop down menu: Tools > Protection > Protect Sheet > OK
GEAR SPREADSHEET ANALYSIS-CONTENT
Copy write, © Gear Spreadsheet Analysis by John R Andrew, 25 Oct 2012
[Link]
SPUR GEARS
The 14.5⁰ pressure angle (PA) results in less backlash due to center
The stress calculated above does not include stress concentration or dynamic loading.
EXAMPLE ONLY
Stub Spur Gear Dimensions
Input
Pressure angle, Pa = 14.5 or 20 20 deg.
Diametral pitch (Whole Number), DP = N/D 4.0 -
Number of gear teeth (Whole Number), N = - 40 -
Gear hub diameter, h = - in
Gear hub width, w = - in
Bore diameter, b = - in
Calculation
Pitch circle diameter, D = N / DP 10.000 in
Addendum, A = 1 / DP 0.250 in
Dedendum, B = 1.157 / DP 0.289 in
Whole depth= Addendum+Dedendum, WD = 2.157 / DP 0.539 in
Clearance, C = .157 / DP 0.039 in
Outside diameter, OD = D + (2*A) 10.500 in
Root circle diameter, RD = D - (2*B) 9.422 in
Base circle diameter, BC = D*Cos(Pa/57.3) 9.397 in
Circular pitch of gear teeth, CP = π*D / N 0.785 in
Circular thickness of gear teeth, T = CP / 2 0.393 in
Chordal gear tooth thickness, TC = D*Sin(90/57.3)/N 0.250 in
Chordal addendum, AC = A + (T^2 / (4*D)) 0.254
Working depth, WD = 2*A 0.500 in
Fillet radius at tooth base, Rb = 0.35 / DP 0.088 in
On 14-1/2°PA
gears undercutting occurs
where a number of teeth is less
than 32 and for 20°PA less than
18.
Since this
condition becomes more
severe as tooth numbers
decrease, it is recommended
that the minimum number of
teeth be 16 for 14-1/2°PA and
13 for 20°PA.
18.
Since this
condition becomes more
severe as tooth numbers
decrease, it is recommended
that the minimum number of
teeth be 16 for 14-1/2°PA and
13 for 20°PA.
a. 4,860 lbf/in^2
b. 5,860 lbf/in^2
c. 6,860 lbf/in^2
GEAR SPREADSHEET ANALYSIS-CONTENT
Copy write, © Gear Spreadsheet Analysis by John R Andrew, 25 Oct 2012
Gleason Zerol Spiral Gears
[Link]
WORM GEARS
Input
Worm/gear design stress from above, Sd = 3,927 lbf/in^2
Tooth width, b = 1.5 in
Circular pitch, Pnc = 1.0473 in
Lewis form factor, Y = 0.094 -
Calculation
Allowable gear tooth load, F = Sd*b*Pnc*Y -
F = 580 lbf
Input Data
Motor power connected to worm gear, HP = 5 hp
Worm rotational speed, Nw = 1750 rpm Friction coefficients (f) -
Worm number of threads or starts, n = 2 [Link]
Worm pitch, p = Gear pitch, P = 0.375 degrees
Worm pitch diameter, dw = 3.500 in m/s
Number of gear teeth (Whole Number), N = 32 - 0
Gear diametral pitch (Whole Number), Pd = 6 0.001
Calculation 0.01
Lead of worm, L = p *n 0.05
= 0.750 0.1
Worm lead angle, LA = 57.3*ATAN(L / (dw *3.1416)) 0.2
= 3.902 deg 0.5
Note: for pressure angle = 20 deg A should be less than 25o 1
Worm rotational velocity at pitch radius, Vw = Nw*p*π 1.5
= 2062 in/min 2
Sliding velocity (m/s), VS = Vw / COS(LA/57.3) 5
= 2066 in/min 8
= 34.44 in/sec 10
= 2.87 ft/sec 15
= 0.875 m/s 20
Friction coefficient (f) for worm gears (Bronze -steel) 30
Coefficient of friction, f = 0,04 VS^-0,25
= 0.0414
Calculation
Worm torque, Tw = 5252*HP / Nw
= 15.01 ft-lb
Worm gear torque friction force, Fwt = 12*Tw / (dw/2)
= 103 lb
Worm and gear ratio, R = N / n
= 16 -
Gear rotational speed, Ng = Nw / R
= 109.4 rpm
Gear torque, Tg = 5252*HP / Ng
= 240.1 ft-lb
Gear pitch circle diameter, DG = N / Pd
= 5.333 in
Worm gear thrust friction force, Fgt = 12*Tg / (DG/2)
= 1080 lb
n < 3, OK
n < 3, Not OK
1.250, 1.750, and 2.000
Friction coefficients (f) - For Case Hardened Steel Worm / Phos Bronze Wheel
[Link]
ft/s f
0 0.145
0.0032808 0.12
0.032808 0.11
0.16404 0.09
0.32808 0.08
0.65616 0.07
1.6404 0.055
3.2808 0.044
4.9212 0.038
6.5616 0.033
16.404 0.023
26.2464 0.02
32.808 0.018
49.212 0.017
65.616 0.016
98.424 0.016
GEAR SPREADSHEET ANALYSIS-CONTENT
Copy write, © Gear Spreadsheet Analysis by John R Andrew, 25 Oct 2012
[Link]
BEVEL GEARS
[Link]
GOAL SEEK
Input
ADJ = 5.20
OPP = 3.00
Calculations
HYP = (ADJ^2 + OPP^2)^(1/2)
= 6.00
Also Excel's Solver can solve multple simultaneous equations; linear, non-linear, or a
mixture of the two.
Excel iteratively adjusts one input value of x to cause one calculated formula cell value of y
to equal a target value of y.
C D
5 Problem
6 Guess X = 1.4
7
8 Y = 2*X^5 - 3*X^2 - 5
9 = -0.1235
Solver Example
1. The input value of X is 1.4 and this value of X causes Y to equal -0.1235 in the
spreadsheet table above.
2. Excel's Solver will adjust the input value of X, in this case1.4 in blue cell D6, by iteration
(repeatedly) until the calculated value of Y in the yellow cell D9 approaches the target value of
zero, ( 0 ).
C D
5 Solution
6 olved X = 1.4041
7
8 Y = 2*X^5 - 3*X^2 - 5
9 = 0.0004
Input
ADJ = 5.20
OPP = 3.00
Calculations
HYP = (ADJ^2 + OPP^2)^(1/2)
= 6.00