0% found this document useful (0 votes)
587 views3 pages

Why Are Filipinos Considered Shallow?

The document discusses why Filipinos are shallow. It notes that while the Philippines has talented people, as a whole it remains shallow. This is due to factors like the educational system's diminished emphasis on humanities and classics, arrogance and lack of humility among some public commentators, and shallow media focused on gossip instead of knowledge. Unless addressed, this shallowness will continue to hinder prosperity, justice, and good governance in the Philippines.

Uploaded by

Bam Disimulacion
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
587 views3 pages

Why Are Filipinos Considered Shallow?

The document discusses why Filipinos are shallow. It notes that while the Philippines has talented people, as a whole it remains shallow. This is due to factors like the educational system's diminished emphasis on humanities and classics, arrogance and lack of humility among some public commentators, and shallow media focused on gossip instead of knowledge. Unless addressed, this shallowness will continue to hinder prosperity, justice, and good governance in the Philippines.

Uploaded by

Bam Disimulacion
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Why we are shallow

F. Sionil Jose
September 12, 2011
Source: https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/arts-and-culture/2011/09/12/725822/why-we-
are-shallow

I was visited by an old Asian friend who lived here 10 years ago. I was floored by his
observation that though we have lots of talented people, as a whole, we continue to be
shallow.

Recently, I was seated beside former Senator Letty Shahani, PhD in Comparative
Literature from the Sorbonne, watching a medley of Asian dances. The stately and
classical Japanese number with stylized movements which perhaps took years to
master elicited what seemed to me grudging applause. Then, the Filipino tinikling which
any one can learn in 10 minutes; after all that energetic jumping, an almost standing
ovation. Letty turned to me and asked, “Why are we so shallow?”

Yes, indeed, and for how long?

This is a question which I have asked myself, which I hope all of us should ask
ourselves every so often. Once we have answered it, then we will move on to a more
elevated sensibility. And with this sensibility, we will then be able to deny the highest
positions in government to those nincompoops who have nothing going for them except
popularity, what an irresponsible and equally shallow media had created. As my foreign
friend said, there is nothing to read in our major papers.

Again, why are we shallow?

There are so many reasons. One lies in our educational system which has diminished
not just scholarship but excellence. There is less emphasis now on the humanities, in
the study of the classics which enables us to have a broader grasp of our past and the
philosophies of this past. I envy those Hindus and Buddhists who have in their religion
philosophy and ancestor worship which build in the believer a continuity with the past,
and that most important ingredient in the building of a nation — memory.

Sure, our Christian faith, too, has a philosophical tradition, particularly if we connect it to
the ancient Greeks and Romans. Remember, the first Bible was in Greek. But Greek,
Latin and the classics in these languages are no longer taught in our schools the way
these are still studied in many universities in Europe.

We are shallow because we are mayabang, ego driven, and do not have the humility to
understand that we are only human, much too human to mistake knowledge for wisdom.
We can see this yabang in some of our public commentators, particularly on TV — the
know-it-alls who think that because they have so much knowledge — available now on
the Web at the click of a button — they can answer every question posed to them. What
they do not realize is that knowledge is not wisdom. Until they recognize that important

1
if sometimes awful difference, they will continue to bluster their way to the top at our
expense because we, the people, will then have to suffer their arrogance and
ignorance.

We are shallow because with this arrogance, we accept positions far beyond our
competence. Because there is no critical tradition in this country — a tradition which will
easily separate the chaff from the grain, we cannot recognize fakery from the real
goods. That outstanding scholar, Wilfredo Villacorta, is a rare bird indeed; when offered
a high position in government, he refused it because he knew he was not qualified for
the job. Any other mayabang academic would have grabbed it although he knows he
can’t handle it. And so it happens always — the nitwits who hold such high positions
stubbornly hold on to their posts, bamboozling their subordinates who may be brighter
than them for that is the only way those who are inferior feel they can have respect.

On the other hand, the intelligent person will be aware of his shortcomings. He does not
hesitate to ask the opinion of those who know more than him on particular subjects. If
he is a government hierarch, he will surround himself with advisers who he knows can
supply him with guidance and background possessing as they do more knowledge,
experience and wisdom than him. Such an official is bound to commit fewer mistakes
because he knows himself.

We are shallow because we lack this most important knowledge — who we are and the
limits to what we can do.

We also lack the perception, and the courage, for instance, to deny these religious
quacks and the thousands who listen and believe in them. Sure, religion is the opium of
the masses as Marx said. So then, how can we prevent the masa from taking this
poison without recognizing their right to make fools of themselves? Again, shallowness
because the good people are silent. Ubi boni tacent, malum prosperat. Where good
men are silent, evil prospers.

This shallowness is the impediment to prosperity, to justice, and men of goodwill should
emphasize this, take risks even in doing so. As the late Salvador P. Lopez said, “It is
better to be silenced than to be silent.”

We are shallow because our media are so horribly shallow. Every morning, I peruse the
papers and there is so little to read in them. It is the same with radio — all that noise,
that artifice.

I turn on the TV on prime time and what do I get? Five juvenile commentators gushing
over the amors of movie stars, who is shacking up with whom. One of the blabbering
panelists I distinctly remember was caught cheating some years back at some movie
award. How could she still be on TV after that moral destruct? And the telenovelas, how
utterly asinine, bizarre, foolish, insipid moronic and mephitic they are! And there are so
many talented writers in our vernaculars and in English as the Palanca Awards show
every year — why aren’t they harnessed for TV? Those TV moguls have a stock answer
— the ratings of these shows are very high. Popularity not quality is their final arbiter.
They give our people garbage and they are now giving it back to all of us in kind! So I

2
must not be blamed if, most of the time, I turn on BBC. Aljazeera, rather than the local
TV channels. It is such a pleasure to read The New York Times, the San Jose Mercury
News, the Washington Post, to listen to “Fresh Air” on US public radio and public TV
where my ever-continuing thirst for knowledge (and good entertainment) is quenched.

We are shallow because we don’t read. I go to the hospital on occasion — the long
corridor is filled with people staring into the cosmos. It is only I who have brought a book
or a magazine. In Japanese cities, in Korea — in the buses and trains, young and old
are reading, or if they are not holding books and magazines, they are glued to their
iPhones where so much information is now available.

In these countries and in Western cities, the bookshops are still full, but not so much
anymore because the new communications technologies are now available to
their masa. How I wish my tiny bookshop or any Filipino bookshop for that matter would
be filled with people. I’ll make an exception here: BookSale branches are always full
because their books are very cheap. But I would still ask: what kind of books do
Filipinos buy?

We are shallow because we have become enslaved by gross materialism, the glitter of
gold and its equivalents, for which reason we think that only the material goods of this
earth can satisfy us and we must therefore grab as much as can while we are able.
Enjoy all these baubles that we have accumulated; sure, it is pleasurable to possess
such artifacts that make living trouble free. And that old anodyne: “Man does not live by
bread alone,” who are the thinking and stubborn few who believe in it?

I hope that those who read this piece still do.

You might also like