Understanding The Evolution of Urban Ren PDF
Understanding The Evolution of Urban Ren PDF
This paper aims to look at the factors and dimensions This paper reviewed secondary data from books,
that effected what Manila City is today. The data journals, local guidelines, news articles, and
collected will be utilized as vital inputs for a more website posts. Interviews and site observation was
holistic and relevantdesign proposal. also performed to validate and further support the
research collected. Site inspections were also
Keywords: urban renewal; urban regeneration; urban utilized to map out the existing conditions of the
design; Metropolitan Theater; Arroceros District area and to better understand the site’s present
economic condition, development potential, and
social dynamics.
I. Introduction
Lastly, this paper may provide supplementary
The Metropolitan Theater (MET)restoration under information for other pursuits of research with the
the National Commission for Culture and the Arts same focus.
(NCCA) is currently progressing. The success of
the project must be looked upon at a much bigger
scaleother than its immediate site as numerous II. Case Study of Metropolitan
present challenges have to be considered along Theater and the Ermita –
with it. In addition, Manila’s MCLUPZO (Manila Intramuros District
Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning
Ordinance) of 2006 or the Manila City ordinance Extensive considerations surrounding the
8119 has considered numerous urban renewal Metropolitan Theater will provide necessary
projects and this must be studied and evaluated contributions beneficial to the design process of
particularly for the area of the MET. Alignment the project. With this, the chosen extent of the
with this ordinance will prove to be beneficial not study is part of the Ermita-Intramuros District
only for the MET but also for the greater context of circumscribed by the Pasig River, the walls of
the area. Based on past accounts, complex layers of Intramuros along Muralla St., and the Manila City
external factors have been impeding significant Hall along Natividad Lopez St.
solutions of long term phases. The restoration
project will hopefully commence better awareness
and appreciation of the concept of urban A. Brief Overview of Manila City
regeneration as a solution to cities’ difficulties like
better urban environments, more economic Manila, the capital city of the Philippines, is part of
opportunities, and improved quality of life. This, the 17 Local Government Units (LGU) of Metro
on a grander dream, may consequently help Manila or the National Capital Region (NCR). It is
regain the status of Manila in its prime era. bounded by the Manila Bay and neighboring cities
such as Quezon City, San Juan, Mandaluyong,
1 of 16
Makati, and Pasay. With an area of 42.88
squarekilometers (sq km), Manila holds
apopulation of 1,780,148 (NSO, 2015 census).
Through the years the succeeding administrations Upon taking office, then-Mayor Atienza decided
of Manila showed different priorities. The Mehan construction of an administrator’s building for the
Garden, for example, closed in the 1960s as the city educators within the park. It resulted into
interest of the public on parks waned. Tranvia much contention and controversy but the project
railways were dismantled after the World War II pushed through, presently eaten up a chunk of the
and the increasing population resulted to forest park. Lim regained his seat of power in the
congestion that became unbearable at the time. LGU and reopened the Arroceros Forest Park to
The government decided to address the issue by the public. With a background in Architecture and
providing flyovers above the Liwasang Bonifacio Urban Design, he had a number of urban renewal
(Plaza Lawton) to facilitate movement. Vehicular projects under “Buhayin ng Maynila” renovating
flyovers and underground pedestrian public facilities such as the Baywalk, Plaza
passageways were constructed, also, in time for Miranda, and Plaza Lawton. However, despite
the city’s 400th year celebration. It is also these efforts, were in question in view of their
interesting to note that according to Roces in his effectiveness. Adding up to afact that he enabled
newspaper article in 2010, a Department of the construction of the Park N’ Ride and the
Education building was built within the Arroceros University of Manila within the Mehan Garden. It
Park. Roces was Secretary of Education during will also be useful to take note that Atienza and
Macapagal’s seat of governance. The Education Lim have alternately exchanged seats of power
Department’s Office was the quonset hut equating to opposing and changing priority
abandoned by the American liberators of Manila. projects of Manila.
It had only 150 existing old trees. Later, Manila
Seedling Bank planted 3,500 saplings and Presently, a new set of administration under
maintained them for one year. The support of the Mayor Estrada has led to new projects like the
Ramos administration resulted to a signed renovation of the Mehan Garden which like the
memorandum of agreement with the Winner previous administrations falls short of its
Foundation. Manila City agreed to lease the site effectiveness to solve its pressing problems.
for development as a nature park by the private
environmental group. Today, the 2.1 hectares of C. Urban Renewals that shaped Manila
Arroceros Forest Park has 61 different species of
There are consideredtwo (2) major urban renewals
trees, 8,000 ornamental plants, and 10 species of
that occurred in city of Manila – the latter years of
birds.
the American colonization and the Marcos
administration around 1970 to 1980.(Munarriz,
The Marcos administration in the 1970s revisited
Perez, Caguimbal, 2015)
the Burnham Plan as the government envisioned
Manila to be a progressive and modern city.
Daniel Burnham’s plan in 1905 aimed to provide
Notable buildings like the Cultural Center of the
(1) Development of waterfront and location of
Philippines (CCP), Philippine International
parks and parkways so as to give proper means of
Convention Center (PICC), Folk Arts Theater,
recreation to every quarter of the city (2) Street
Manila Film Center, and the Coconut Palace were
system securing direct and easy communication
3 of 16
from every part of the city to every part (3) The Manila City Ordinance No. 8119 (or
Location of building sites for various activities (4) MCLUPZO)
Development of waterways for transportation and The MCLUPZOwas enacted in 2006 in response to
(5) Summer resorts. the continuous growth of the city. The general idea
(https://burnhampi.wordpress.com/2010/06/06/ was to create an integrated atmosphere where
the-plan-manila/) residential, commercial, service, and cultural uses
come together to form a new community. (Kone,
Many of Burnham’s suggestions for urban 1994) It sought to promote and enhance the
amenities (streets, parks, railroads, and public standard of living in the city aligned with local
buildings) were similar to those found in his plans codes - the National Building Code, Fire Code and
for the cities of Cleveland, San Francisco, and Accessibility Code. This Ordinance also protected
Washington, D.C. but he still incorporated criteria Rizal Park, a major public open space that serves
that are suitable for Manila of which that the as a social condenser and breathing space for the
structures must not be dictated by a specific busy and chaotic city. Similarly, other pocket
architectural style (Neoclassical) but must focus on parks within the city were protected by the
the formal arrangement of the structures, Ordinance. These were the Mehan Garden,
accommodate the “manana ambiance” ingrained Arroceros Forest Park, and the linear parks along
from Spanish-Philippine traditions, and special Roxas Boulevard. However, compliance to and
considerations due to the tropical setting of implementation of the local codes in these open
Manila. The Burnham Plan was applied selectively spaces were not evident before and even after the
through the years for a number of factors. One, ordinance was enacted.(Munarriz, Perez,
was the Quezon administration’s reallocation of Caguimbal, 2015)
the budget to irrigation infrastructure for the
Quezon province.
4 of 16
Structures
Non-strategic and makeshift parking areas were The past Local Government Units, based on their
created by the users of nearby structures varying short and long term plans, located structures
in institutional, office, and commercial typologies. within the public spaces that poses questions to
Landmarks like the Liwasang Bonifacio their suitability and appropriateness. Taken for
monument were demoted of their status as cars example the Mehan Garden wherein the present
and PUVs proliferate the area. During peak hours, condition barely reminds the people of its original
uncontrolled PUV terminals add up to the features. Urbanity seemed to compel us that public
confusion and chaos of the area. Commuters spaces are placed below schools, parking facilities,
extend their spaces almost one-third (1/3) of the and commercial establishments. How are you
major road. going to talk about heritage preservation and
quality public spaces when there are glaring issues
on poverty surrounding the area?
5 of 16
Some interesting inputs were also gathered from The approximately 40 Ha proposed development
an interview with Ar. Luna, a heritage aims to improve the urban environment, advance
conservation graduate and professor at UP the quality of life of the area, create more
Diliman, Architecure. He shared that the noise functional and effective spaces, providemore
coming from the LRT-1 can be heard from the distributed economic opportunities, and more
Metropolitan Theater. This current scenario can be options for the local users.
solved through specialized architectural fields
such as acoustics. Other options are also possible The conceptualization process started byvalidating
and can be looked upon with careful the walkability of the area by determining ranges
consideration. In addition, the MET stage can be from the Liwang Bonifacio (Plaza Lawton) which
seen from the existing flyovers along Taft Ave. is the central part of the development and the
This, can also be approached either by solving mass transit station LRT-1.The strength of the
from within or by creating architectural solutions development seeks to deviate from the previous
outside the structure. design solutions is theresponsiveness of the place
to the users. Connect all the public spaces and the
III. The New Arroceros District: notable structures with a cohesive vehicular and
A More Responsive Public Space pedestrian circulation.
Fig. 5 A more detailed design matrix showing the criteria that shaped the design proposal
6 of 16
. 7 of 16
8 of 16
Fig. 6 Space Connectivity Pattern/Diagram
9 of 16
Fig. 7 Road Network Plan
10 of 16
Fig. 9 Transport System Plan
11 of 16
Fig. 10 Aerial Perspective of the new development
12 of 16
Fig. 13 Mehan Garden Complex
Fig. 15 Promenade
13 of 16
IV. Proposed Project Timeline
14 of 16
V. Conclusion and progress. The government must also realize that
Recommendations decent public spaces are not exclusive for a
specific type of economic bracket. This must ideal
must work hand in hand with the community’s
It is evident that the political dimension of a city
sense of ownership to protect and maintain their
plays an important role in shaping cities. Apart
cities.
from the personal preferences of the changing
seats of power in the Local Government Unit, a
After the presentation of the design proposal in
better understanding of their job descriptions will
class, valid and supportive insights were shared.
amount to positive changes in a city. Advocates
As with any creative outputs, continuous reviews
and planners claim that the LGU itself do not
and revisions from different points of view are
understand their roles and the processes
essential. The group will have to consider if more
stipulated in the Local Government Code. Some
options in terms of pedestrian access and urban
reasons include – They find them too technical to
details are needed to achieve a more responsive
understand, absence of support from key persons
public space. Questions rendered in class along
needed in design workshops, and clear
with the group’s answer will be specified in the
understanding and acceptance of the demarcation
appendix.
of legislative and executive functions of the LGU.
The locals must also be aware that they have the VI. References
ability to decide on what options they want in
terms of better urban environment and more Bentley I., Smith G., (1985) Responsive Environments
opportunities. Communities in other countries are A Manual for Designers
included in the decision making in the design of
their cities. Their urban design awareness is http://manila.gov.ph/government/
impressive and they value the importance of
quality public spaces as an inherent part of a city’s http://cityofmanila.com.ph/
15 of 16
http://lifestyle.inquirer.net/45693/intramuros-to-
https://www.psa.gov.ph/content/highlights- turn-into-nighttime-manila-destination
philippine-population-2015-census-population
Lico, G., Tomacruz M. (2014-2015) Infrastures of
https://www.facebook.com/metropolitantheater Colonial Modernity: Public Works in Manila from the
manila1931/timeline?ref=page_internal late 19th to the early 20th Centuries, Espasyo Journal
of Philippine Architecture and Allied Arts
https://burnhampi.wordpress.com/2010/06/06/t
he-plan-manila/ Munarriz, M.; Perez, P.; Caguimbal R. (2014-2015)
Urban Renewal of the City of Manila and its impact to
https://en.yelp.com.ph/biz/park-n-ride-manila Environment and Physical Design: Where Can We Go
from Here?Espasyo Journal of Philippine
Horite, M. and Koizume, M. Innovations in Architecture and Allied Arts
Collaborative Urban Regeneration
Interview
Alcazaren, P. (2015) “Saving Arroceros” Luna, M. (March 2016)
http://www.philstar.com/modern-
living/2015/05/16/1455088/saving-arroceros VII. Appendix
Flores, R. L. (2012) “Arroceros: A Showcase of Question 1: How are you going to access the MET
Heritage Conservation and Neglect” from the basement?
https://liquiddruid.wordpress.com/2012/06/17/
arroceros-a-showcase-of-heritage-ignorance-and- Answer: Ingress and egress points for motorized
neglect/ vehicles are provided along Taft Ave. and Antonio
Villegas Street. From the basement, an access point
Alcazaren, P. (2002) “Relaunching Lawton” is located leading to the Mehan Plaza and the
http://www.philstar.com/modern- MET. The area will be designed with objectives
living/2002/02/16/150831/relaunching-lawton such as identifiable and welcoming entrance,
safety and security.
Rubio, P. “Manila Metropolitan Theater” and
Manila Central Post Office Building” Question 2: We don’t have a question, we like
http://arquitecturamanila.blogspot.com/p/buildi your concept. We would like to suggest
ngs.html pedestrianization along the 3 existing bridges.
Valmero, A. (2011) “Arroceros Park caretaker calls Answer: Well noted. Pedestrianization is
on the youth to save Manila’s ‘last lung’” considered in the said areas, allotting lanes for foot
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/arroceros-park- and bike traffic will entail either extending the
caretaker-calls-youth-save-manilas-last- bridge with or minimizing existing road for
095410644.html dedicated foot and bike lanes.
Roces, A. (2005) “Arroceros Forest Park should be Question 3: What are your parameters for your
preserved” concept on different ground and sublevels of
http://www.philstar.com/opinion/2005/04/21/2 pedestrian and vehicular traffic?
74716/arroceros-forest-park-should-be-preserved
Answer: One of our considerations is to achieve
Alcazaren, P. (2012) “Bridging Urbanism” cohesive pedestrian and vehicular circulation. The
http://www.philstar.com/modern- sublevel highways are intended to facilitate
living/2012/03/24/789891/bridging-urbanism movement of through the site. This will also
address the problem of sightlines for the key
(2011) “Manila Sight-Seeing: When an Intramuros structures. The green bridges and underground
Walking Tour Turns into a Pedicab Tour” passageways will allow pedestrians more options
http://www.thepinaysolobackpacker.com/manil to explore the park. Robustness, variety, and
a-when-an-intramuros-walking-tour-turns-into-a- richness will be used to articulate the urban
pedicab-tour/ details. Safety and security will also be considered.
16 of 16