Scribd
Upload
40 views1 page

Comments On MTR - Aravinda K

The evaluator provided feedback on Aravinda K's capstone project titled "Groom Business Development in the competitive Market- Newly Formed Government-Ap". The introduction needed more structure and definition of the problem. The description of the problem section needed to clearly define the problem and goals. A literature review was needed but was missing. The description of the project implementation needed more work. The action plan for project implementation was also insufficient. Overall, the presentation needed improvement in areas like spelling, structure, and articulating future actions.

Uploaded by

Aravind Kayampady
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
40 views1 page

Comments On MTR - Aravinda K

The evaluator provided feedback on Aravinda K's capstone project titled "Groom Business Development in the competitive Market- Newly Formed Government-Ap". The introduction needed more structure and definition of the problem. The description of the problem section needed to clearly define the problem and goals. A literature review was needed but was missing. The description of the project implementation needed more work. The action plan for project implementation was also insufficient. Overall, the presentation needed improvement in areas like spelling, structure, and articulating future actions.

Uploaded by

Aravind Kayampady
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Capstone Project MTR Evaluation Sheet

PARTICIPANT:- Aravinda K

TITLE:-Groom Business Development in the competitive Market- Newly Formed Government-Ap

DATE:- 3rd Oct'18

EVALUATOR:- Dr. Chakradhar Iyyunni / Prof. David Bradolet

Content Categories Comments


Introduction (10 points)
• Is the objectives for this project adequately described?
• Does the introduction provide a complete overview of the problem to be addressed? Needs more structure and
• Does the introduction provide information on why this project is beneficial to this Change title:- new geography
defination of the problem
organization?

The Description of the Problem (10 points)


• Is the problem clearly defined?
• Are goals clearly described and why they were chosen to guide the project?
i) Need to define problem clearly
• Was a complete overview of the business context of the capstone provided?
ii) Good info & org contest ---
• Were organizational challenges addressed?
• How were goals and objectives chosen to measure the impact of the project?
• Is the project design adequate for achieving the stated objectives?

Review of the Literature/ Research (10 points)


• Was relevant literature review reviewed?
• Did the outcome of the literature review provide a reasonable directions lto capstone Needs literature review ---
project?
Description of the Project (10 points)
• Does the report provide a complete overview of the implementation of the project-
describing strengths as well as weaknesses of the project? Needs Work ---
• Are the results presented completely with appropriate measures of success and failure
in implementation?
Action Plan for implementation of Capstone Projects(10 Points)
• Are the action plan reasonable, given the overview of the project?
• Is the project's suggested lessons learned implementable? Needs Work ---
• What recommendations are made for next steps as a result of this project?

Presentation (50 points)


• Was the participant presented clearly and succinctly?
i) Attention to spelling,
• Did the participant clarify the rationale for the capstone project? Structure needed types, too many
ii) Capstone Planning poor
• Did the participant make clear articulation for future action and potential application?

You might also like