Jurnal Lain
Jurnal Lain
yste : Ope
lS
a
nA
Biologic
ccess
Biological Systems: Open Access Rashed, Biol syst Open Access 2015, 4:2
DOI: 10.4172/2329-6577.1000147
ISSN: 2329-6577
Abstract
Purpose: To describe and evaluate normal adult dog dentition and temporomandibular joint anatomically and
histologically in comparison to humans.
Method: Five adult dogs (6-12 months old) were used in this study. The following anatomical structures were
histologically evaluated in a qualitative fashion: Teeth and related bony structures mandible, mandibular condyle,
disc, Zygomatic arch, temporal bone, glenoid fossa, retrodiscal tissue and synovia. The macroscopical and
microscopic study of the human TMJ was based on the current literature.
Results: Dogs have three Incisors, one canine, four premolars, and 2 molars in the upper and 3 molars in the
lower jaw. The TMJ is surrounded by a thin fibrous tissue capsule, and a synovial lining. The mandibular angle has a
prominent shape. The glenoid fossa is flat, with extended mediolaterally with retroarticular process. Histologically,
the TMJ is composed of different tissues that comprise the mandibular head, mandibular fossa and fibrocartilaginous
disc. A layer of fibrous tissue covers the articulating cortical condyle and temporal bone followed by a layer of
hyaline cartilage.
Conclusion: Morphologically and numerically dog's teeth are different from humans. Morphologically and
histologically, the articular structure of dogs is, on the whole, similar to that of humans. In these animals there is no
articular eminence, but they have a retroarticular process.
Page 2 of 8
Page 3 of 8
apically to a blunt apex. There is almost no visible root trunk. Bony components of TMJ of adult dog and their relations to
Maxillary fourth premolar: It is the largest tooth in the maxillary arch, each other
it is slightly wider mesially than distally, it has 2 cusps, the mesial one is
wide and pointed, but the distal one is smaller and more flat, both The joint is located anteroir and slightly superior to the eustachian
separated by a short deep groove that ends with a large pit on the tube and Tymbanic bulla, bellow the posterior end of zygomatic arch
buccal surface of the crown. The facial surface is convex while the (Figure 2A) the glynnoid fossa in which the condylar head articulates
palatal is flat. It has three roots; 2 mesial and one distal, the is oval in shape and directed mediolateraly (Figure 2B and 3A), it has a
mesiolingual one is the thinnest and the shortest while the distal is the small rounded elvation on the posterior end called the retroarticular
broadest and the longest. Mandibular premolars: They are very similar process ,and a flat smooth anterior and lateral ends(Figure 2A, 2B and
to the maxillary ones except the fourth mandibular premolar, which is 3A). The zygomatic arch is composed of two bones the zygomatic bone
similar to the third mandibular premolar and not to the maxillary and the zygomatic process of the temporal bone. It covers the dorsal
fourth premolar (Figure 1). part of the coronoid process (Figure 2A). The Mandible is composed of
two halves joind together by symphesis mentalis (Figure 3B) it has a
Molars: Maxillary first molar: The crown appears triangular from long body which carries the teeth, a long rounded coronoid process
the occlusal view with the apex of the triangle pointing lingually, it that forms a shallow mandibular notch with the condyle which ends
contains three large cusps; two buccal and one lingual with a deep slightly above the occlusal surface of molars. There is a deep V-shaped
circular central fossa, the lingual cusp is subdivides into three smaller depression on the ramus in which the masseter muscle is attatched
elevations; one mesial and two distal. The mesial surface of the crown called the massetertic fossa,the mandibular angle is proturuded
is convex while the distal surface is concave. It has three roots two backward and forms a wide acute angle with the condyle(Figure
buccal and one lingual, the buccal roots are small, short, and have 2C).The condylar head is smooth, narrow antroposteriorly and wide
irregular rounded apices. The lingual root is the shortest and widest of mediolateraly. It is perpendicular to the occlusal plane of teeth and
them all and has a wide flat square apex (Figure 1). Maxillary second slightly angulated in relation to the coronoid process (Figure 3B).
molar: It is the shortest tooth in the oral cavity. From the occlusal
surface, it is very similar to the first molar but smaller in size. The
distobuccal root is fused to the lingual root (Figure 1). Mandibular first
molar: It is the largest tooth in the mandibular arch and it is very wide
mesiodistally. From the facial view it has three cusps; with the middle
being the largest, and the distal being the shortest, from the occlusal
view there are five cusps, three on the mesial side and two on the distal
separated from each other by a deep fossa. It has two roots similar in
size, broad cervically and with almost no root trunk (Figure 1).
Mandibular second molar: It is broad mesiodistally than
buccolingually, with three cusps; two long mesial cusps and one short
distal cusp, separated by a shallow circular fossa. It has two roots, the
mesial is thin, and distal slightly thinker and both are curved distally
(Figure 1). Mandibular third molar: It is very small tooth having a
rounded crown with two very shallow circular fossae and no distinct
cusps; it has only one short conical root (Figure 1).
Page 4 of 8
Page 5 of 8
Articular disc
The disc appeared as a dense, fibrous structure. Anteriorly the disc
splits into two bands, the upper band attaches to the temporal bone,
and the lower one attached to the condylar head, in between these two
bands, muscles fibers of lateral pterygoid muscle are inserted into the
disc. Posteriorly, the disc is divided into inferior and superior lamellae.
The inferior lamella is thin, extended from fibrous disc and covers the
posterior surface of head of condyle. Laterally, the disc expands into a Figure 7: LMs of dog TMJ complex. Coronal section showing the
massive retrodiscal pad of fibrous tissue with adipose cells and blood Condyle (Cd), the Temporal bone (T), Articular disc (Ad), and
vessels (Figure 7A and 9F).It has a thin central avascular part and Articular capsule (Ac), Synovial membrane (Sm) [Gomori's
thicker vascular peripheral parts especially the posterior part (Figure trichrome original magnification X 40].
9A-9C).
Articular capsule
The TMJ capsule appeared loose collagenous membrane that
attaches to the borders of the articular surfaces. This attachment
enlarges posteriorly at the temporal and condylar divisions of the
retrodiscal tissue. The anterior part of the capsule could also be
followed in association with the attachment of lateral pterygoid
muscle. Synovial membrane folds could be traced at the lateral and
medial extremities of the disc overlying a strand rich in fat cells
exhibited rich fat cells of adipose tissue (Figure 9C-9E).A Small to
Page 6 of 8
stabbing and killing prey. These teeth are also used as a display to
threaten other dogs. The broader pointed teeth behind the canines are
the premolars and molars, which are used for holding, cutting,
shearing meat and for crushing bones. The largest of these teeth are
known as carnassials, which work together to slice up meat like a pair
of scissors [31,32]. The teeth of man are the result of a process of
reduction and adaptation. As compared to most animal dentitions, the
human teeth are deficient in number and in structure. This relative
deficiency of the human teeth is associated with an advanced
development of the brain: man has learned to use tools and weapons
and to cook his food, and thus his teeth are no longer of vital
importance to him. Some of the characteristics distinguishing the
human from other mammalian dentitions are the fact that in man all
teeth are in contact with each other and that all teeth erupt to the same
level while in most animals some teeth are longer than others [31]. The
dental arches are horseshoe in shape, with no diastema between teeth
Figure 8: (A-D) A.LMs of Higher magnification of articular surface
in both dentitions. While the dental arches in dogs are V-shaped and
of Temporal bone showing the Fibrous articular coverage (Faz),
there is a small diastema between the third incisor and canine in upper
note the thick bony trabeculae (Bt) and wide marrow spaces (Bm)
arch and between canine and first premolar in lower arch.
[Gomori's trichrome original magnification X100]. B. Higher
magnification of the LM inset in figure A showing: the Fibrous
articular coverage (Faz), Cell-rich proliferative zone (Crz),
Fibrocartilaginous zone [Gomori's trichrome X400]. C. articular
surface of condyle (Cd) and part of articular disc (Ad) note the
thinner bone trabeculae than that of the temporal bone [Gomori's
trichrome X100]. D. Higher magnification of the previous LM inset
articular surface of the Condyle (Cd), showing the Fibrous articular
coverage (Faz) with numerous blood vessels, Cell-rich proliferative
zone (Crz), and Fibrocartilaginous zone (Fcz) [Gomori's trichrome
X 400].
Discussion
The use of experimental animals in research has contributed
massively in medical advance for human health, it aided in testing of
antibiotics, dialysis development, organ transplantation, vaccinations,
chemotherapy, bypass surgery and joint replacement, which allowed us
to live longer, healthier, and enjoying happier lives [23]. In the Figure 9: (A-F) LMs high power views of parts of TMJ structure. A.
description of teeth, hard and soft anatomical components of TMJ as Articular disc at the peripheral lateral part showing the sparse
well as the histological of that joint in the experimental animals distribution of cells and some few Blood vessels (Bvs) [Gomori's
studied, we relied on and were guided by scientific information trichrome X 400]. B. Central part of articular disc [H&E X400]. C.
provided in universal documented literature [21,24-28]. Regarding the Synovial folds (Arrow) covering the extremities of the Articular disc
animal used in this study we could display, compare, and contrast the (Ad). [H&E original magnification X400]. D. Synovial
results we observed in the following points: membrane(Sm), covering the Articular disc (Ad) [Gomori's
trichrome X 400]. E. The attachment of Articular disc (Ad) to the
Dentition capsule (Ac), Synovial membrane (Sm) [Gomori's trichrome X400].
Dog and human dentitions are diphyodont that has two sets of teeth F. The medial part of the joint showing the loose connective tissue
(deciduous and permanent) [29]. They have ―brachydont or low- with large Blood vessels (Bv), and muscular fibers [Gomori's
crowned teeth. This form and structure of tooth consists of a crown trichrome X original magnification X100].
that shows above the gum line, a smaller neck at the gum line, and a
deep root tied to the jawbone [30].
Alveolar bone, zygomatic arch and temporal bone
Teeth
In dog and man the zygomatic arch is made of two bones which are
Our findings of the anatomy and morphology of dog’s teeth the zygomatic processes of both frontal and temporal bones [33,34].
correlated well with all of the description mentioned in the dental
literature. The teeth of a dog are adapted for cutting meat and breaking Mandible
bones. At the front of the skull are the small incisors that are used for
nipping small pieces of meat from close to bones. The long strong In our study, we noticed that mandibular suture of dog is firm.
pointed teeth behind the incisors are the canines, which are used for However for humans this suture is completely fused reflecting an
Page 7 of 8
important point of variation among animals on one side and between eminence [40]. Humans capsule is a thin, slack cuff that does not limit
animals and man on the other side. The human mandible consists of a mandibular movements and is too weak to provide much support for
horseshoe-shaped body and a pair of rami. The body is divided into an the joint. It is attached to the mandibular fossa and to the neck of
upper alveolar part and the lower base. The ramus is smooth with no condyle [25].
masseteric fossa and ends above in two processes-the coronoid
anteriorly and the articular condyle posteriorly. Between them is a Histological study
notch-the sigmoid notch. The shape of the mandibular angle of dogs is
more prominent than man. [35,36] Generally, in histological sections, the TMJ is composed of different
tissues that include the condylar head, mandibular fossa,
fibrocartilaginous disc, and fibrous capsule. [18,24,25] Based on the
Temporomandibular joint
results of our study it is possible to say that, with regard to the
The temporomandibular joint is critical for normal mouth function, histological features, there is a great similarity between dog’s, and
and plays a role in chewing, swallowing, speaking, oral health, and human’s TMJ.
nutrition. The TMJ is unique to mammals, but among different
mammalian groups, its morphology and function vary enormously. Bony components
Practicality dictates that animal models will not be the closest mimics
of the human condition. Currently, the most used species are rats, Four main layers cover the articular surface of temporal bone as well
rabbits, pigs, and ruminant ungulates. Each has distinctive TMJ as of the condyle. The first layer is a fibrous layer, in puppies, there was
adaptations [37]. Our observation confirmed this statement since we no obvious difference to that of human. The second layer is the cell-
found that the anatomical structure of dog’s TMJ are different mainly rich proliferative zone that showed no significant differences in all
in the shape and direction of both of the glenoid fossa and condyle and specimens. The third layer is consists of randomly arranged cartilage
both are different from those of human. TMJ of dogs is a plain hinge cells embedded in fibrous tissue forming the fibrocartilaginous zone.
joint that permits only opening and closing movement without lateral The final layer is the calcified cartilage zone, which also showed no
excursion, there is little or no actual mastication of food. The condyle remarkable differences.
and the mandibular fossa are elongated laterally and provide a strong
hinge joint [31]. The TMJ of man is a modified synovial joint divided Soft tissue components
by an articular disk it allows hinge and sliding movements [25].
There is an interposed fibrocartilaginous disc of biconcave
morphology between the bony components. The structure and shape
Mandibular condyle of the disc in dogs is similar to that of the human one [41]. No
Dog's condyle is cylindrical and has an inferior inclination medially. difference in the structure of capsule and synovial membrane from the
The long axes of the two condyles are directed at right angle to the human’s joint.
midsagittal plane. The articular surface of the condyle could be divided
into two parts, one horizontal on the superio-anterior part and one on References
the medial side of the posterior part [38]. Man's condyle is ovoid with
the anteroposterior dimension being about half the mediolateral 1. Cohen BJ, Loew FM (1984) Laboratory Animal Medicine: Historical
perspective. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
dimension. The long axis of the condyle is not at right angle to the
ramus but diverged posterolaterally [25]. 2. Greek R, Greek JS (2004) Are animals necessary in 2002? Reply to Dr
Michael Festing's book review of Sacred Cows and Golden Geese: the
Human Cost of Experiments on Animals. Altern Lab Anim 32 Suppl 1B:
Temporal bone and the glenoid fossa 741-746.
The mandibular fossa of dog is located mediolaterally, at the base of 3. Abdel-Halim RE (2006) Contributions of Muhadhdhab Al-Deen Al-
Baghdadi to the progress of medicine and urology. A study and
the zygomatic arc and well-defined retroarticular process is found
translations from his book Al-Mukhtar. Saudi Med J 27: 1631-1641.
caudal to it [34]. While in humans, the mandibular fossa is located on
the inferior aspect of the temporal bone [24]. It is composed of an 4. Mock M, Fouet A (2001) Anthrax. Annu Rev Microbiol 55: 647-671.
anterior part and a posterior part. Anterior part is in the form of 5. Windholz G (1987) Pavlov as a psychologist. A reappraisal. Pavlov J Biol
Sci 22: 103-112.
eminence while posterior part is in the form of a depression or cavity
in inferior part of temporal bone C) Disc: During dissection of TMJ, 6. Gorden P (1997) Non-insulin dependent diabetes--the past, present and
future. Ann Acad Med Singapore 26: 326-330.
the articular disc of dog appeared thin, oval. The human TMJ the disk
has a bow-tie-shaped biconcave morphology. The anterior and 7. Walgate R (1981) Armadillos fight leprosy. Nature 291: 527.
posterior ridges of the disk are longer in the mediolateral than in the 8. Scollard DM, Adams LB, Gillis TP, Krahenbuhl JL, Truman RW, et al.
(2006) The continuing challenges of leprosy. Clin Microbiol Rev 19:
anteroposterior dimension. The smaller anterior band attaches to the
338-381.
articular eminence, condylar head, and joint capsule. The posterior
9. Trevor P. The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of
band blends with the bilaminar zone and the capsule. The bilaminar Laboratory Animals, 7th ed. Blackwell Science, Inc: 1999.
zone is residing in the retrodiscal space of the mandibular fossa and
10. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG (2007) Animal
attaching to the condyle and temporal bone [39]. models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater
13: 1-10.
Capsule 11. Bate M (1997) The Dog as an Experimental Animal. ANZCCART News
10: 1-8.
In Dog's the TMJ was surrounded by a capsule. The capsule
stretches from the edge of the mandibular fossa to the neck of the 12. Cochran PE (2004) Laboratory manual for comparative veterinary
anatomy and physiology'. Delmar learning.
mandible, proximal to the pterygoid fovea, and envelops the articular
Page 8 of 8
13. Slatter HD. Textbook of small animals. Volume 2. saunders, Elsevier: 27. Avery JK, Chiego DJ (2006) Essentials of oral histology and embryology:
2003. a clinical approach. Mosby Elsevier.
14. Romich J. An illustrated guide to veterinary medical terminology. 3rd 28. Williams PL (1998) Gray's Anatomy. Churchill Livingstone.
edition. Delmar,Gengage learning: 2009. 29. Tummers M, Yamashiro T, Thesleff I (2007) Modulation of epithelial cell
15. Porto GG, Vasconcelos BC, Andrade ES, Silva-Junior VA (2010) fate of the root in vitro. J Dent Res 86: 1063-1067.
Comparison between human and rat TMJ: anatomic and histopathologic 30. Burnette C (2010) Anatomy of Dog teeth.
features. Acta Cir Bras 25: 290-293.
31. Rudolf K (1937) Dental Histology and comparative dental anatomy. Lee
16. Siéssere S, Vitti M, Semprini M, Regalo SC, Iyomasa MM, et al. (2008) and Fibiger.
Macroscopic and microscopic aspects of the temporomandibular joint
related to its clinical implication. Micron 39: 852-858. 32. Thinktank (2013) Birmingham science museum. Dog skull. Last updated.
17. Smith KK (2001) The evolution of mammalian development. Bull Mus 33. Julian BW, Rickne CS (2002) Dental anatomy its relevance to dentistry.
Comp Zool 156: 119-135. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
18. Reilly JS Euthanasia of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. 34. Aaron H, Rolf B (2007) Anatomy of dog. Schlutersche Verlagsgesllschaft:
ANZCCART. 2nd ed: 2001. mbH & Co.KG.
19. Yamazaki T (2010) Animal Bone Specimens Preparation Method, 35. Thrall DE, Robertson ID (2011) Atlas of normal and radiographic
Environmental Archaeology Section Nara National Research Institute for anatomy and anatomic variants in the dog and cat. Saunders Elsevier.
Cultural Properties. 36. Margaret EB (1917) Handbook of Anatomy for Students of Massage.
20. Koolstra JH (2002) Dynamics of the human masticatory system. Crit Rev Bailliere, Tindall and Cox.
Oral Biol Med 13: 366-376. 37. Kawamura Y, Kato I, Miyoshi K (1968) Functional anatomy of the lateral
21. Ten Cate AR (2012) Oral histology: development, structure and function. pterygoid muscle in the cat. J Dent Res 47: 1142-1148.
8th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book. 38. Ström D, Holm S, Clemensson E, Haraldson T, Carlsson GE (1988) Gross
22. Bancroft JD (2008) Theory and practice of histological techniques. 6th ed. anatomy of the craniomandibular joint and masticatory muscles of the
Elsevier. dog. Arch Oral Biol 33: 597-604.
23. Pro-Test. Examples of benefits. 2006. 39. Satoh K, Satoh K, Imaizumi Y, Yokoi M, Kondoh T, et al. (2011) Magnetic
resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint in the rat compared
24. Satish Chandra (2007) Textbook of Dental and oral histology with with low-powered light microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 56: 1382-1389.
embryology. Jaypee brothers.
40. Siéssere S, Vitti M, Semprini M, Regalo SC, Iyomasa MM, et al. (2008)
25. Berkovitz B, Holland G, Moxham B (2009) Color Atlas and Textbook of Macroscopic and microscopic aspects of the temporomandibular joint
Oral Anatomy Histology and Embryology 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year related to its clinical implication. Micron 39: 852-858.
Book.
41. Schmolke C (1994) The relationship between the temporomandibular
26. Avery Jk, Steele PF, Avery N. Oral Development and histology. Stuttgart; joint capsule, articular disc and jaw muscles. J Anat 184 : 335-345.
New York: Thieme: 2002.