Mastering Work Shop For MRS
Mastering Work Shop For MRS
Inform our Workshop Attendees on a ‘Best Practice for SAP Multi Resource
Scheduling (SAP MRS)’ in a Plant Maintenance Environment.
The ‘Best Practice’ Maintenance Scheduling Process
Basic Data
SAP MRS in Practice
Relevant Customizing Activities
AVAILABLE CAPACITY
REQUIRED CAPACITY
2w 8w 2y
LTS: Do we employ the right people with the right skills on long term (train, recruit,
discharge) ?
The proposition of SAP MRS is to cover Short Term Scheduling as well as Mid
Term Scheduling!
NO
Construction
Activities Concrete Assignment
to Technician(s)
Regular
MTS
Adjustments to
Capacitive Assignment to
Mid Term
Technician(s)
schedule
Scheduling = Balancing between required and available capacity , however is not easy......
Required Available
Capacity Capacity
SAP Customizing
Manual Creation
and Update of (No(n)) SAP HRM
(Interface not possible)
HRM Master Data
Available
Capacity
Organizational Unit
Capacity (HCM)
24 WORK SCHEDULE
SAP MRS Kevin Rudd (KR)
Z_MRS1
16 Mid Term Schedule
John Howard (JH) Mo-Fr: 08:00-16:00
Lunchbreak: Variabel (30 m)
8 Paul Keating (PK)
Z_MRS2
Bob Hawke (BH) Mo-Th: 08:30-16:30
M T W T F S S Fr: 08:00-12:00
John Fraser (JF) Lunchbreak: Variabel (30 m)
WORK CENTER excl. Friday
CAPACITY Day/Week Schedule Edward Whitlam (EW)
MECH-T (SAP ERP HRM)
(SAP ERP EAM (PM))
Factory Calender
Adresses Qualifications
(0006) (0024)
Works
Bank Details
Councils
(0009)
(0054)
Insurance
MRS relevant Infotypes
(0037)
Examples of other Infotypes
Organizational Unit
Job
Position
Person
Customizing
- Forward and backward integration of Work Orders
Time Specifications
Operation
Settings:
- Control Key
- Plant
- Order Type
- User Status (Header Level) Forward Integration SAP
Data:
- Work Center
- Dates/Times MRS
- Priority
- Qualification Profile
- Relationships
- Other Operation Data (Adaptable)
Which Work
should really be
done?
Work Preparation
When and by
which
Technicians
Easy (mobile) User
should this Work Interface for
be done? Technicians
8.Reports:
- Utilization Report
- Back Log
© 2010 SAP AG / 20101124_Mastering SAP PM-MRS (PvD) / Page 50
Scheduling Work Orders
1. Mid Term Scheduling
We are looking forward to the worklaod for the Mechanic Technicians in the Clarification Plant in
week 49.2010 (06.12.2010 – 10.12.2010).
In the Demand View of SAP MRS the Scheduler analyses the situation.
In consultation with Production it is decided that one of the overlaod causing Work Orders, the
Work Order/Operation ‘Clean Filter’ can be rescheduled to a later day in week 49.
After rescheduling this Order the situation appears to be improved however there is still not a
100% Balance.
The Work Scheduler should also ‘play around’ with other Work Orders/Operations to create a
100% In Balance Work Schedule (not shown in demo!).
Over Evaluation Period Available Capacity for the Work Center is shown
On 07.12.2010 there is an Overload , among others caused by Operation 10 of Work Order 816820. Rescheduling the Work Order Operation with
easy Drag&Drop to 09.12.2010 could solve a part of the problem.
Order detail data can directly be accessed from the Planning Board.
Although the situation is better than before the Work Scheduler has to analyze also other Work Orders and judge their reschedulability
to create an ‘In Balance’ Schedule.
For tomorrow, November 12th, 2010 Paul Keating will be assigned to the Emergency Service.
Now, an Emergency Situation is coming up: an Hydrocyanic Acid in the Sewage Gas Processing
is suspiced.
The Emergency started at 11:00
Kevin Rudd is informed on this situation; Kevin is supposed to solve the problem.
Afterwards Kevin has to confirm spend hours and materials on a Work Order.
The Scheduler creates a Work Order, e.g. at 12:00.
Estimation is that Kevin needs 3 hours to fix the problem.
The Order is – of course – assigned to Kevin starting at 11:00.
Because no other Emergencies are known at the moment and Kevin is supposed to work on low
priority (postponable) Jobs, the Scheduler will refer to the still to assign postponable demands
(= Priority 9 Jobs) and assign such a Job to Kevin to be executed next to the Emergency.
The Time Specification Button is pressed and with Drag & Drop the Time for that Time
Specification is marked in the Planning Board.
The scheduler takes a closer look to the Work Schedule for tomorrow, Friday
November 12th, 2010.
Looking in the list of assignable Demands the scheduler finds a Job that could be done by Bob.
The Production Manager wants to know if the Work Order is assigned already and displays the
Work Order.
John Fraser is assigned to do a Job that is scheduled for this afternoon, November 11th, 2010
and has to be continued tomorrow.
However, John’s wife organized her Birthday Party yesterday evening, and John was a little bit
too happy to celebrate that Birthday: Today he feels bad.
John decides to report sick to his manager and is send home.
The scheduler has to analyze the Work Schedule to find the Consequences of this unexpected
unavailibility of John.
First of all the Scheduler makes visible in the Work Schedule that John is not available due to
his Illness.
He is convinced that John will resume work tomorrow, November 12th, 2010.
The Job that was assigned to John to start this afternoon has to be rescheduled.
The Scheduler will reassign John’s Job for this afternoon to John Howard.
The Mechanic Technician’s Manager, checking the Work Schedule, has a dissenting view and
decides that John Fraser will do the entire Job on his own starting tomorrow morning.
The scheduler adjusts the Work Schedule accordingly.
The scheduler takes a closer look to the Work Schedule for Monday, November 15th, 2010.
Looking in the list of assignable Demands the scheduler finds a Job that has to be executed
by 2 Technicians.
The Scheduler’s Assistent is looking to the Demands that still have to be assigned.
From his technical experience he knows that such a Job requires an assignment to a Specialist,
however, because he doesn’t know which Technician has the skills to do the Job, he uses the
‘Suitable Resources’ functionality to give him the answer to this question.
The Technician with the best fit will be assigned to the Job.
In the Clarification Plant the Philosophy is agreed that the Work Schedule for a Technician for a
week consists of a combination of:
- Concrete Assignments:
The Scheduler decides at what Day/Time a Technician should start a Job.
- Capacitive Assignments:
The Scheduler decides that a Job has to be done within a week, the Technician however is
free to decide at what Day/Time he will start the Job.
The Scheduler takes a closer look to the Work Schedule of Paul Keating for next week, starting
November 15th, 2010 and decides to make a Capacitive Assignment for Paul.
Expanding Paul’s scheduling line in the Work Schedule it is displayed which Concrete and
Capacitive Assignments are made for Paul.
Managers want to have an overview on overall Work Schedules without navigating around in a
Work Schedule.
SAP MRS is delivered with a standard Utilization Report that can be accessed in the Work
Schedule to have a quick overview for 1 Technician.
This report however can also be executed for an Organizational Unit (all Technicians).
Backlog Reporting is used to have an Overview of Demands still to be assigned and should
have been executed already.
Backlog Reporting is used to trigger the reconsideration if the Job really has to be done.
MRS comes out-of-the box with a certain preconfiguration and can be very flexibly adjusted to
the requirements of each individual customer
Authorizations
Authorization object on level of resource planning node (work center)
Change/Display
Employee qualifications
Usage of MRS qualifcations or HR qualifcations
Specific functionalities
Usage of capacitive assignments
Automatic assignment creation
Qualification matching: Configuration of additional criteria