FOR OFFICERS IN BPS 19 & 20 CONFIDENTIAL
GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Ministry /Division/ KA & GB Affairs Service/Group Ex-Cadre
Department/Office Education
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD 1st January 2018 TO 31st December 2018
PART I
(TO BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON)
1. Name (in block letters) MAJEED KHAN
2. Personnel number 50073891
3. Date of birth 4 March 1963
4. Date of entry in service 11 November 1986
5. Post held during the period (with BPS) Director Education (Planning) BS-20
6. Academic qualifications M.A, M.Ed.
7. Knowledge of languages (Please indicate proficiency in speaking (S), reading (R) and writing (W)
Urdu Speak (Good) Read (Good) Write (Good)
English Speak (Good) Read (Good) Write (Good)
Wakhi (Native)
1
8. Training received during the evaluation period (Training courses attended earlier,
if any, may please be listed separately on the back page of the report).
Name of course attended Duration with dates Name of institution and country
9. Period served
(i) In present post 0 year 8 months (ii) Under the reporting officer 4 years and 5 months
PART II
(TO BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON)
1. Job description
To supervise:
1. Preparation of annual departmental priority list of development schemes;
2. Preparation of annual budget proposals of the department and internal audit
thereof;
3. Preparation of PC-1s of the departmental projects;
4. Submission of demand for releases and expenditure/reconciliation etc;
5. Execution of projects carried out through Technical Cell of the department;
6. Collect annual educational data and publish/disseminate reports;
AND Undertake any assignment given by the Secretary Education Gilgit-Baltistan.
2
2. Brief account of achievements during the period supported by statistical data where
possible. Targets given and actual performance against such targets should be
highlighted. Reasons for shortfall, if any, may also be stated.
The assignments were carried out timely and ensured best possible documents for
consideration in line with the departmental policies, procedures and guidelines;
Maintain close liaison with Planning & Development Department to safeguard
departmental interests;
Ensured preparation and submission of PC 1s of the ADP projects and attended
meetings of forums of approval;
Ensured on time budget preparation, its utilization and reconciliation of accounts;
Education data was collected, published and disseminated to the stakeholders;
Field visits were paid to give feedback to TC of the department; AND
Completed inquiries and other assignments entrusted by the department from time to
time.
PART III -
(EVALUATION BY THE REPORTING OFFICER)
1. Please comment on the officer's performance on the job as given in Part II (2) with
special reference to his knowledge of work, ability to plan, organize and supervise,
analytical skills, competence to take decisions and quality and quantity of output. How
far was the officer able to achieve the targets? Comment on the officer's contribution,
with the help of statistical data, if any, in the overall performance of the organization. Do
you agree with what has been stated in Part II (2)?
3
A B C D
1 Quality of work Generally produces work
Always produce work of exceptionally of poor quality.
high Quality
2 Output of work Always behind schedule;
Always up-to-date; accumulates no very slow disposal.
arrears
2. Integrity (Morality, uprightness and honesty)
A B C D
1. Integrity
a. General Unscrupulous
Irreproachable
b. Intellectual
Honest & straightforward Devious; Sycophant
3. Pen picture including the officer's strengths and weaknesses with focus on
emotional stability, ability to work under pressure, communication skills and
interpersonal effectiveness. (Weakness will not be considered as adverse entry unless
intended to be treated as adverse).
4. Area and level of professional expertise with suggessions for future posting.
4
5
5. Training and development needs.
6. Overall grading
7. Fitness for promotion Comment on the officer's potential for holding a higher
position and additional responsibilities.
Name of the reporting officer Signature
(Capital letters)
Designation Date
6
PART IV
(REMARKS OF THE COUNTERSIGNING OFFICER)
1. How often have you seen the work of the officer reported upon?
Very frequently Frequently Rarely Never
2. How well do you know the officer? If you disagree with the assessment of
the reporting officer, please give reasons.
3. Overall grading
4. Recommendation for promotion (Comment on the officer's potential for holding a
higher position and additional responsibilities).
7
5. Evaluation of the quality of assessment made by the reporting officer.
Exaggerated Fair Biased
Name of the countersigning officer Signature
(Capital letters)
Designation Date
PART V
REMARKS OF THE SECOND COUNTERSIGNING OFFICER (IF ANY)
Name Signature
Designation Date
