Gawqs
Gawqs
( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters.
(i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality
necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected.
(ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support
propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the
water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division
finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and
public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process,
that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important
economic or social development in the area in which the waters are
located. In allowing such degradation or lower water quality, the division
shall assure water qua lity adequate to protect existing uses fully. Further,
the division shall assure that there shall be achieved the highest statutory
and regulatory requirements for all new and existing point sources and all
cost-effective and reasonable best management practices for nonpoint
source control.
(c) I n applying these policies and requirements, the Division will recognize and
protect the interest of the Federal Government in interstate and intrastate
(including coastal and estuarine) waters. Toward this end the Division will consult
and cooperate with the Environmental Protection Agency on all matters affecting
the Federal interest.
(d) In those cases where potential water quality impairment associated with a
thermal discharge is involved, the division's actions shall be consistent with
Section 316 of the Federal Clean Water Act.
(e) Variance. Variances are a temporary mod ification to the designated use and
associated criteria. Variances may be written for a specific geographic area,
pollutant, or source. The State may issue variances that can provide rel ief to a
permittee while they upgrade their facility to meet the standard. Variances are
based on a use attainability demonstration, which requires a scientific assessment
of factors affecting the attainment of a standard. Variances target achievement of
the highest attainable water quality standard, must be reviewed every three
years, and do not allow for a reduction in treatment efforts. Before a variance to a
water quality standard is applied to a permitted discharger or to a waterbody, it
must be demonstrated that one of the following factors has been satisfied :
(i) Naturally occurring pollutant concentrations prevent the attainment of the
use; or
(v) Physical conditions related to the natural features of the water body such
as the lack of a proper substrate, cover, flow, depth, pools, riffles, and the
like, unrelated to water quality, preclude attainment of aquatic life
protection uses; or
(vi) Controls more stringent than those required by sections 301(b) and 306 of
the Clean Water Act wou ld result in substantial and widespread economic
and social impact.
(f) Removal of a Designated Use. The State may remove a designated use which is
not an existing use, as defined in 40 CFR 131.3, or establish sub-categories of a
use if the State can demonstrate that attaining the designated use is not feasible.
This is done through a use attainability analysis. The use attainability analysis is a
scientific assessment of factors affecting the attainment of a use and may include
physical, chemical, biological and/or economic factors . A detailed analysis is
required demonstrating that certain conditions are met indicating that the
designated use cannot be met and should be removed . The use attainability
analysis should be conducted in accordance with the US EPA Technical Support
Manual: Waterbody Surveys and Assessments for Conducting Use Attainability
Analyses and /or any State guidance documents. The factors that can be used are
as follows:
( i) Naturally occurring pollutant concentrations prevent the attainment of the
use; or
(ii) Nat ural, ephemeral, intermittent or low flow conditions or water levels
prevent the attainment of the use, unless these conditions may be
compensated for by the discharge of sufficient volume of effluent
discharges without violating Georgia's water conservation requirements to
enable uses to be met; or
(v) Physical conditions related to the natural features of the water body such
as the lack of a proper substrate, cover, flow, depth, pools, riffles, and the
like, unrelated to water quality, preclude attainment of aquatic life
protection uses; or
(vi) Controls more stringent than those required by sections 301(b) and 306 of
the Clean Water Act would result in substantial and widespread economic
and social impact.
(3) De finitions. All terms used in this paragraph shall be interpreted in accordance with
definitions as set forth in the Act and as otherwise herein defined:
(a) "Acute criteria" corresponds to EPA's definition for Criteria Maximum
Concentration which is defined in 40 CFR 131.36 as the highest concentration of a
pollutant to which aquatic life can be exposed for a short period of time ( 1-hour
average) without deleterious effects.
(d) "Coastal waters" are those littoral recreational waters on the ocean side of the
Georgia coast.
(e) " Existing instream water uses" include water uses actually attained in the
waterbody on or after November 28, 1975.
(g) "Critical cond itions" are the collection of cond itions for a particular waterbody used
to develop Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), determine NPDES permit limits,
or assess the protection of water quality standards . The Division considers
appropriate critical conditions to represent the event that would occur once in ten
years on the average or less often, unless otherwise stated.
(h) "Natural conditions" are the collection of conditions for a particular waterbody
used to develop numeric criteria for water quality standards which are based on
natural conditions. This is commonly the case for temperature and natural
dissolved oxygen standards. For this purpose the Division defin es "natural
conditions" as those that would remain after removal of all point sources and
water intakes, would remain after removal of man made or induced nonpoint
sources of pollution, but may include irretrievable effects of man's activities,
unless otherwise stated. Natural conditions shall be developed by an examination
of historic data, comparisons to reference watersheds, application of mathematical
models, or any other procedure deemed appropriate by the Director.
(j) " Reasonable and necessary uses'' means drinking water supplies, conservat ion,
protection, and propagation of fish, shellfish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic
life, agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other legitimate uses.
(k) "Secondary contact recreation" is incidental contact with the water, wading, and
occasiona l swimming.
(I) "Shellfish" refers to clams, oysters, sca llops, mussels, and other bivalve mollusks.
(n) "Water" or "waters of the State" means any and all rivers, streams, creeks,
branches, lakes, reservoirs, ponds, drainage systems, springs, wells, wetlands,
and all other bodies of surface or subsurface water, natural or artificial, lying
within or forming a part of the boundaries of the State which are not entirely
confined and retained completely upon the property of a sing le individual,
partnership, or corporation .
(o) "Areas where salt, fresh and brackish waters mix" are those areas on the coast of
Georgia having a salinity of 0.5 parts per thousand and greater. This includes all
of the creeks, rivers, and sounds of the coastal area of Georgia and portions of the
Savannah, Ogeechee, Altamaha, Satilla and St. Marys Rivers where those rivers
flow into coastal sounds. Mixing areas are generally maintained by seawater
transported through the sounds by tide and wind which is mixed with fresh water
supplied by land runoff, subsurface water and river flow . Mixing areas have
moving boundaries based upon but not limited to river stage, rainfall, moon phase
and water use. (For the purposes of this rule salinity shall be analyzed by in situ
measurement using a properly calibrated multi -parametric probe connected by
hard line to a deck display or by measuring electrica l conductivity according to
one of the methods specified in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 136
and applying the guidance for conversion to salinity in the same volume.
Collection of salinity samples must consider riverflow, precipitation, tidal
influences and other variables of the estuarine environment and must conform to
the National Coastal Assessment-Quality Assurance Project Plan 2001-2004
(EPA/620/R-01/002). Measurements at each sampling location must be made in a
distribution in the water column according to the Quality Assurance Project Plan,
with the minimum observations at each station including surface, mid-depth and
near-bottom readings. In situ salinity analysis must comply with the
QualityAssurance Project Plan and the manufacturer's guidance for the specific
instrument used).
( 4) Water U se Classifica tions. Water use classifications for which the criteria of this
Paragraph are applicable are as follows:
(a) Drinking Water Supplies
( b) Recreation
(c) Fish ing, Propagation of Fish, Shellfish, Game and Other Aquatic Life
(d) Wi ld River
(5) General Criteria for All Waters. The fol lowing criteria are deemed to be necessary and
applicable to all waters of the State:
(a) All waters shall be free from materials associated with municipal or domestic
sewage, industrial waste or any other waste which will settle to form sludge
deposits that become putrescent, unsightly or otherwise objectionable.
(b) All waters shal l be free from oil, scum and floating debris associated with
municipal or domestic sewage, industrial waste or other discharges in amounts
sufficient to be unsightly or to interfere with legitimate water uses.
(c) All waters shall be free from material related to municipal, industrial or other
discharges which produce turbidity, color, odor or other objectionable conditions
which interfere with legitimate water uses.
(d) Turbidity . The following standard is in addition to the narrative turbidity standard
in Paragraph 391 - 3- 6- .03(S)(c) above: All waters shall be free from turbidity
which results in a substantial visual contrast in a water body due to a man-made
activity. The upstream appearance of a body of water shall be as observed at a
point immediately upstream of a turbidity-causing man-made activ ity. That
upstream appearance shall be compared to a point which is located sufficiently
downstream from the activity so as to provide an appropriate mixing zone. For
land disturbing activities, proper design, installation, and maintenance of best
management practices and compliance with issued permits shall constitute
compliance with Paragraph 391- 3- 6-.03(S)(d).
(e) All waters shall be free from toxic, corrosive, acidic and caustic substances
discharged from municipalities, Industries or other sources, such as nonpoint
sources, in amounts, concentrations or combinations which are harmful to
humans, animals or aquatic life.
(i) Instream concentrations of the following chemical constituents which are
considered to be other toxic pollutants of concern in the State of Georgia
shall not exceed the criteria indicated below under 7-day, 10-year
minimum flow (7Q10) or higher stream flow conditions except within
established mixing zones:
1. 2,4 -Dichlorophenoxyacetlc acid (2,4- 0) 70 µg/L
2. Methoxychlor 0.03 µg/L *
3. 2,4,5 -Trichlorophenoxy propionic acid (TP Silvex) 50 µg/L
5. Copper
7.0 µg/L 5.0 µg/L
(a) Freshwater 1,2 ',3 1,2•,3
1 2 12
(b) Coastal and Marine Estuarine Waters 4.8 µg/L • 3.1 µg/L •
6. Lead
13 1.2 µg/L
(a) Freshwater 30 µg/L • 1,2• ,3
1 1
(b) Coastal and Marine Estuarine Waters 210 µg/L 8.1 µg/L
7. Mercury
0.012 µg/L
(a) Freshwater 1.4 µg/L 2
0.025 µg/L
(b) Coastal and Marine Estuarine Waters 1.8 µg/L 2
8. Nickel
1 3
(a) Freshwater 260 µg/L • 29 µg/L 1 •3
(b) Coastal and Marine Estuarine Waters 74 µg/L 1 8.2 µg/L 1
9. Selenium
(a) Freshwater 5.0 µg/L
1
(b) Coastal and Marine Estuarine Waters 290 µg/L 71 µg/L I
4
10. Silver -- 4
11. Zinc
(a) Freshwater 65 µg/L 1 •3 _65 µg/L 1•3
{b) Coastal and Marine Estuarine Waters 90 µg/L 1 81 µg/L I
Lindane [Hexachlorocyclohexane (g-BHC-
12 . Gamma)]
1
The in- stream criterion is expressed in terms of the dissolved fraction in
the water column. Conversion factors used to calcu late dissolved criteria are
found in the EPA document - Nationa l Recommended Water Quality Criteria
- EPA 2006 .
2
The in-stream criterion is lower than the EPD laboratory detection limits (A
" * " indicates that the criterion may be higher than or lower than EPD
laboratory detection limits depending upon the hardness of the water).
3 The freshwater aquatic life criteria for these metals are expressed as a
function of total hardness (mg/L) in a water body. Values in the table above
assume a hardness of 50 mg/L CaC03. For other hardness values, the
following equations from the EPA document - National Recommended Water
Quality Criteria - EPA 2006 shou ld be used.
Cadm iu m
hardness)(0.041838)) µg/L
Chromium III
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
1
"CAS RN" or the Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) Registry Number is a
unique numerical identifier assigned to each chemical and some chemical
mixtures.
2
The instream freshwater criterion for pentachlorophenol is a function of pH,
determined by the formula (e ( 1.oos( pH)- s . i 34 >) , At a pH equal to 7.8 standard
units the criterion is 15 µg/L.
*The in-stream criterion is lower than the EPD laboratory detection limits.
(v) Site specific criteria for the following chemical constituents will be
developed on an as needed basis through toxic pollutant monitoring efforts
at new or existing discharges that are suspected to be a source of the
pollutant at levels sufficient to interfere with designated uses:
1. Asbestos
(f) Applicable State and Federal requirements and regulations for the discharge of
radioactive substances shall be met at all times.
(g) The dissolved oxygen criteria as specified in individua l water use classifications
shall be applicable at a depth of one meter below the water surface; in those
instances where depth is less than two meters, the dissolved oxygen criterion
shall be applied at a mid-depth. On a case specific basis, alternative depths may
be specified.
(6) Specific Criteria for Classified Water Usage. I n addition to the general criteria, the
following criteria are deemed necessary and shall be required for the specific water usage
as shown:
(a) Drinking Water Supplies: Those waters approved as a source for public drinking
water systems permitted or to be permitted by the Environmental Protection
Division. Waters classified for drinking water supplies will also support the fishing
use and any other use r equiring water of a lower quality.
(i) Bacteria: For the months of May through October, when water contact
recreation activities are expected to occur, fecal coliform not to exceed a
geometric mean of 200 per 100 ml based on at least four samples
collected from a given sampling site over a 30-day period at intervals not
less than 24 hours. Should water quality and sanitary studies show fecal
coliform levels from non-human sources exceed 200/100 ml (geometric
mean) occasionally, then the allowable geometric mean fecal coliform shall
not exceed 300 per 100 ml in lakes and reservoirs and 500 per 100 ml in
free flowing freshwater streams. For the months of November through
April, fecal coliform not to exceed a geometric mean of 1,000 per 100 ml
based on at least four samples collected from a given sampling site over a
30-day period at intervals not less than 24 hours and not to exceed a
maximum of 4,000 per 100 ml for any sample. The State does not
encourage swimming in these surface waters since a number of factors
which are beyond the control of any State regulatory agency contribute to
elevated levels of bacteria.
(ii) Dissolved oxygen: A daily average of 6.0 mg/land no less than 5.0 mg/l
at all times for waters designated as trout streams by the Wildlife
Resources Division. A daily average of 5.0 mg/Land no less than 4.0 mg/L
at all times for water supporting warm water species of fish.
(b) Recreation: General recreational activities such as water skiing, boating, and
swimming, or for any other use requiring water of a lower quality, such as
recreational fishing. These criteria are not to be interpreted as encouraging water
contact sports in proximity to sewage or industrial waste discharges regardless of
treatment requ irements:
(i) Bacteria:
1. Coastal waters : Culturable enterococci not to exceed a geometric
mean of 35 CFU (colony forming units) per 100 ml. The geometric
mean duration shall not be greater than 30 days. There shall be no
greater than a ten percent excursion frequency of an enterococci
statistical threshold value (STV) of 130 CFU per 100 ml the same
30-day interval.
(ii) Dissolved Oxygen : A daily average of 6.0 mg/land no less than 5.0 mg/l
at all times for waters designated as trout streams by the Wildlife
Resources Division. A dai ly average of 5.0 mg/land no less than 4.0 mg/l
at all times for waters supporting warm water species of fish.
(c) Fishing: Propagation of Fish, Shellfish, Game and Other Aquatic Life; secondary
contact recreation in and on the water; or for any other use requiring water of a
lower quality.
( i) Dissolved Oxygen: A daily average of 6 .0 mg/l and no less than 5 .0 mg/l
at all times for water designated as trout streams by the Wildlife Resources
Division. A daily average of 5.0 mg/land no less than 4.0 mg/lat all times
for waters supporting warm water species of fish.
(ii) pH: Within the range of 6.0 - 8.5 .
(iii) Bacteria:
1. For the months of May through October, when water contact
recreation activities are expected to occur, fecal coliform not to
exceed a geometric mean of 200 per 100 ml based on at least four
samples collected from a given sampling site over a 30-day period
at intervals not less than 24 hours. Should water quality and
sanitary studies show fecal coliform levels from non-human sources
exceed 200/100 m l (geometric mean) occasionally, then the
allowable geometric mean fecal coliform shall not exceed 300 per
100 ml in lakes and reservoirs and 500 per 100 ml in free flowing
freshwater streams. For the months of November through April,
fecal coliform not to exceed a geometric mean of 1,000 per 100 ml
based on at least four samples collected from a given sampling site
over a 30-day period at intervals not less than 24 hours and not to
exceed a maximum of 4,000 per 100 ml for any sample. The State
does not encourage swimming in t hese surface waters since a
number of factors which are beyond the control of any State
regulatory agency contribute to elevated levels of bacteria .
(d) Wild River : For all waters designated in 391-3-6-.03(13) as "Wild River," there
shall be no alteration of natural water quality from any source.
(e ) Scenic River : For all waters designated in 391- 3- 6-. 03(13) as "Scen ic River,"
there shall be no alteration of natural water quality from any source .
(f) Coastal Fishing: This classification will be applicable to specific sites when so
designated by the Environmental Protection Division. For waters designated as
"Coastal Fishing", site specific criteria for dissolved oxygen will be assigned. All
other criteria and uses for the fishing use classification will apply for coastal
fishing.
(i) Dissolved Oxygen :A daily average of 5.0 mg/Land no less than 4 .0 mg/Lat
all times. If it is determined that the "natural condition" in the waterbody is
less than the values stated above, then the criteria will revert to the
"natural condition" and the water qua lity standard will allow for a 0.1 mg/L
deficit from the "natural" dissolved oxygen value. Up to a 10% deficit wil l be
allowed if it is demonstrated that resident aquatic species shall not be
adversely affected .
( 7) Natural Wate r Quality. It is recognized that certain natural waters of the State may
have a qua lity that will not be within the general or specific requirements contained
herein. These circumstances do not constitute violations of water quality standards . This
is especia lly the case for the criteria for dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH and bacteria .
NPDES permits and best management practices will be the primary mechanisms for
ensuring that discharges will not create a harmful situation.
(8 ) Treatment Requireme nts. Notwithstanding the above criteria, the requirements of the
State relating to secondary or equivalent treatment of all waste shall prevail. The
adoption of these criteria shall in no way preempt the treatment requirements.
(9) Streamflows . Specific criteria or standards set for the various parameters apply to all
flows on regulated streams. On unregulated streams, they shall apply to all streamflows
equal to or exceeding the 7-day, 10-year minimum flow (7Q10) and/or the 1-day, 10-
year minimum flow (1Q10) . All references to 7- day, 10-year minimum flow (7Q10) and
1-day, 10-year minimum flow {lQlO) also apply to all flows on regulated streams. All
references to annual average stream flow also apply to long -term average stream flow
conditions. Numeric criteria exceedences that occur under streamflows lower than 7Q10
or lQlO, whichever applies, do not constitute violations of water quality standards as
long as all current permit conditions are met.
( 10) Mix ing Zone. Effluents released to streams or impounded waters shall be fully and
homogeneously dispersed and mixed insofar as practical with the main flow or water
body by appropriate methods at the discharge point. Use of a reasonable and limited
mixing zone may be permitted on receipt of satisfactory evidence that such a zone is
necessary and that it wi ll not create an objectionable or damaging pollution condition.
Protection from acute toxicity shall be provided within any EPD designated mixing zone
to ensure a zone of safe passage for aquatic organisms . The procedure is as described in
paragraph 391 - 3-6- .06(4)(d)(S)(vi), except that the numerical pass/fai l criteria applies
to the end -of -pipe without the benefit of dilution provided by the receiving stream .
(11) Tox ic Pollutant Monitoring . The Division will monitor waters of the State for the
presence or impact of Section 307 (a)( I) Federal Clean Water Act toxic pollutants, and
other priority pollutants. The monitoring shall consist of the collection and assessment of
chemical and/or biological data as appropriate from the water column, from stream bed
sediments, and/or from fish tissue . Specific stream segments and chemical constituents
for monitoring shal l be determined by the Director on the basis of the potentia l for water
quality impacts from toxic pollutants from point or nonpoint waste sources . Singularly or
in combination, these constituents may cause an adverse effect on fish propagation at
levels lower than the criteria. Instream concentrations wil l be as described in 391-3-6 -
.03(5)(e) . Additional toxic substances and priority pollutants will be monitored on a case
specific basis using Section 304(a) Federal Clean Water Act guidelines or other
scientifically appropriate documents.
( 12) Bacte ria Criteria . The criteria for bacteria provide the regulatory framework to support
the USEPA requirement that States protect all waters for recreational use. The bacterial
indicators for primary contact recreational waters are E. coli and enterococci. The
bacterial indicator for secondary contact recreational waters is fecal coliform.
(a) Fecal coliform, E. coli and enterococci bacteria live in the intestinal tract of warm
blooded animals including man . These organisms are excreted in extremely high
numbers. Pathogenic bacteria also originate in the fecal material of diseased
persons. Therefore, waters with high levels of bacteria represent potential
problem areas for swimming. Scientific studies indicate there is a positive
correlation between E. coli and enterococci counts and gastrointestional illness.
However, there is no positive scientific evidence correlating elevated fecal
coliform counts with transmission of enteric diseases. In addition, these bacteria
can originate from any warm blooded animal or from the soil.
(b) Monitoring programs have documented bacterial levels in excess of the criteria in
many streams and rivers in urban areas, agricu ltural areas, and even in areas
not extensively impacted by man such as national forest areas. This is not a
unique situation to Georgia as similar levels of bacteria have been documented
in streams across the nation.
( 13) Acceptance of Data . Sampling methods for water quality samples collected and
reported by any person(s), (including volunteer groups), to the Division for its use in
listing or delisting impaired waters pursuant to the State's responsibilities under
Sections 303(d) and 305(b) of the Federal Act shall conform to the guidance in the
Water ProtectionBranch Quality Assurance Manual (June, 1999), or most current
version, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Division,
Watershed Protection Branch, Atlanta, GA 30354. Analytical standards for these samples
must comply with the requirements of Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 136.
Sample analyses shall be performed by an analyst certified in compliance with the
Georgia State Board of Examiners for Certificationof Water and Wastewater Treatment
Plant Operators and Laboratory Analysts Act, as amended, or by a laboratory facility
accredited in compliance with the Georgia Rules for Commercial Environmental
LaboratoryAccreditation (O.C.G .A. 12-2- 9) . A site- specific sampling and quality
assurance plan is required if the data is to be considered and Division concurrence must
be obtained prior to monitoring. Laboratories operated by Federal and State government
agencies and laboratories at academic institutions with active or current contracts with
the Division are exempt from these provisions. The Division may use water quality data
for screening purposes if it was collected by any person(s), ( including volunteer groups),
without an approved sampling and quality assurance plan.
( 14) Specific Water Use Classifications. Beneficial water uses assigned by the State to all
surface waters . These classifications are scientifically determined to be the best
utilization of the surface water from an environmental and economic standpoint.
Streams and stream reaches not specifically listed are classified as Fishing. The specific
classifications are as follows:
ALTAMAHA
CLASSIFICATION
RIVER BASI N
All littoral waters on the ocean
side of Sea and Sapelo Islands,
Recreation
and on the ocean and sound side
of St. Simons Island
Buttermilk Sound Reimolds Pasture Recreation
Big Creek
Foe Killer Creek to Chattahoochee . k.
0 nn mg
w t
River a er
Blue Creek Headwaters to Yel lowjacket Creek Drinking Water
Camp Creek
Headwaters to confluence with . k.
0 nn mg
w t
Hazel Creek a er
Cedar Creek Headwaters to Alexander Creek Drinking Water
Little Taylor Creek
Centralhatchee Creek to Drinking Water
Chattahoochee River
Headwaters to confluence with .
Chattahoochee River Recreation
Soque River
Recreation and
Chattahoochee River Soque River to White Creek
Drinking Water
Chattahoochee River White Creek to Mud Creek Recreation
Recreation and
Chattahoochee River/Lake Lanier Mud Creek to Buford Dam
Drinking Water
Buford Dam to Atlanta (Peachtree Recreation and
Chattahoochee River
Creek) Drinking Water
Atlanta {Peachtree Creek) to Cedar F h"
Chattahoochee River Creek is mg
Chattahoochee River Pink Creek to Harris Creek Drinking Water
~=~!tahoochee River/West Point New River to West Point Dam Recreation and
Drinking Water
Flat Creek
Turkey Creek to confluence with D . k" w t
Yellow jacket Creek nn mg a er
Hazel Creek Law Creek to Camp Creek Drinking Water
Headwaters of Unnamed Lake Franklin, F.D. Roosevelt State R t"
. ecrea ion
Tributary to Bethlehem Creek Park Beaches
Hi II ab ah ate h ee Cree k
Tolleson Branch to Chattahoochee . k.
0 nn mg
wat er
River
Little Kolomoki Creek
Lake Kolomoki, Kolomoki Mounds R r
State Park Beach ecrea ion
Sandy Creek Headwaters to Golden Creek Drinking Water
Turner Creek
Headwaters to confluence with D . k' w t
Tesnatee Creek rin ing a er
Upatoi Creek Heriot Creek to Armory Creek Drinking Water
Yahoola Creek
Bryant Creek to confluence with D . k' w t
Chestatee River nn ing a er
Cartecay River
Clear Creek to confluence with D . k' w t
Ellijay River nn ing a er
Duck Creek
Confluence with Dry Creek to D . k' w t
Dickson Creek nn ing a er
Ellijay River
Briar Creek to confluence with D . k' w t
Cartecay River nn ing a er
Etowah River Headwaters to Montgomery Creek Drinking Water
Etowah River Lily Creek to Mill Creek Drinking Water
Oostanaula River
Confluence with Wood ward Creek D . k. w t
to Coosa River rrn rng a er
Headwaters to confluence with
Pettit Creek Disharoon Creek (including Lake Drinking Water
Pettit)
Heads Creek
Headwaters to Shoal Creek D . k. w t
(including Heads Creek Reservoir) nn rng a er
Horton Creek
Headwaters to Flint River D . k ' w t
(including Horton Creek Reservoir) nn rng a er
Headwaters to Line Creek Drrn
. k.rng W at er
Keg Creek
(includ ing Hutchins Lake)
Lazer Creek Rocky Branch to Gin Creek Drinking Water
Towaliga River
Thompson Creek to Georgia Hwy. D . k.
nn mg
wat er
36
Georgia Hwy. 36 to High Falls Lake R t·
Towaliga River Dam ecrea ion
High Falls Lake, High Falls State R t"
Towaliga River Park Beaches ecrea ion
Tobesofkee Creek Reeves Creek to Rock Branch Drinking Water
Georgia Hwy. 74 to Lake .
Tobesofkee Creek Recreation
Tobesofkee Dam
Town Creek Headwaters to Ocmulgee River Drinking Water
Headwaters to confluence with
Tributary to Dried Creek Dried Indian Creek (including Drinking Water
Covington Reservoir)
Tussahaw Creek Headwaters to Baker Branch Drinking Water
Curry Creek
Headwaters to confluence with D . k. w t
Little Curry Creek nn mg a er
Headwaters to confluence with
Fort Creek Sikes Creek upstream of Lake Drinking Water
Sinclair
Hard Labor Creek Headwaters to Lake Brantley Dam Drinking Water
Lake Rutledge, Hard Labor Creek R t.
Hard Labor Creek State Park Beaches ecrea ion
Hard Labor Creek Lake Rutledge Dam to Mile Branch Drinking Water
Jacks Creek Headwaters to Grubby Creek Drinking Water
Lake Oconee to Lake Oconee Dam Recreation and
Lake Oconee
(Wallace Dam) Drinking Water
Lake Oconee Dam downstream to Recreation and
Lake Sinclair
Sinclair Dam Drinking Water
Little River Big Indian Creek to Glady Creek Drinking Water
Popes Branch
Headwaters to confluence with D . k. w
Pearson Creek nn ing ater
(15) Trout Streams . Streams designated as Primary Trout Waters are waters supporting a
self-sustaining population of Rainbow, Brown or Brook Trout. Streams designated as
Secondary Trout Streams are those with no evidence of natural trout reproduction, but
are capable of supporting trout throughout the year. Trout streams are classified in
accordance with the designations and criteria as follows:
(a) Criteria.
(i) There shall be no elevation of natural stream temperatures for Primary
Trout Waters; 2 °F or less elevation for Secondary Trout Waters.
Prima ry:
None .
Secondary:
CARROLL COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
3. Tallapoosa River.
CATOOSA COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Seconda ry :
1. Dry Creek watershed upstream from Catoosa County Road 257 (East
Chickamauga Creek Watershed).
CHATTOOGA COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
CHEROKEE COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
COBB COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
DADE COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
1. Al lison Creek watershed .
DAWSON COUNTY
Primary:
Secondary:
ELBERT COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
1. Savannah River for the ten-mile reach downstream from Hartwell Dam.
FANNIN COUNTY
Primary:
1. Conasauga River - Jacks River watershed.
Secondary:
All streams or stream sections not classified as primary in the above list.
FLOYD COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
FORSYTH COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
1. Chattahoochee River.
FULTON COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
GILMER COUNTY
Primary:
Secondary:
1. All
1. thereof except
All streams or sections thereof except the
the Coosawattee
Coosawattee River downstream
from Ga.
Ga . Hwy.
Hwy. 5 Bridge, and Talking
Talking Rock
Rock Creek
Creek(not
(not including
including tributaries)
tributaries)
and those classif
and ied as
classified as primary.
primary.
2. Ball Creek
2. Creek watershed
watershed..
3. Creek watershed.
3. Sevenmile Creek
5. Wildcat Creek
5. Creek watershed.
watershed.
GORDON COUNTY
Primary:
None .
None.
Secondary:
1. Johns Creek
1. Creek watershed.
2. Long Branch
2. Long Branch watershed.
watershed.
3. Pine
3. Pine Log
Log Creek
Creek watershed
watershed upstream
upstream from Georg ia Hwy.
from Georgia Hwy. 53.
4.
4 . Pin
Pin Hook
Hook Creek
Creek watershed
watershed upstream
upstream from Gordon
Gordon County Road
Road 275.
5. Rocky
Rocky Creek watershed upstream
Creek watershed upstream from Gordon
Gordon County Road
Road 210.
Salacoa Creek
6. Salacoa Creek watershed
watershed upstream
upstream from
from U.S.
U.S. Hwy.
Hwy. 411.
7. Snake
7. Snake Creek
Creek watershed.
GWINNETT
GWINNETT COUNTY
COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
1. Chattahoochee River.
HABERSHAM COUNTY
Primary:
2. Middle Fork Broad River watershed upstream from USFS Route 92-B.
Secondary:
3. Middle Fork Broad River tributaries entering below USFS Route 92-B.
6. Soque River watershed upstream from the mouth of Deep Creek to King's
Bridge (Georgia Hwy. 197).
HARALSON COUNTY
Primary :
None.
Secondary:
HART COUNTY
Primary :
None.
Secondary :
1. Savannah River.
LUMPKIN COUNTY
Prima ry :
Secondary:
MURRAY COUNTY
Prima ry:
2. Holly Creek watershed upstream from Murray County Rd. SR826 (U.S.
Forest Service line).
Secondary:
2. Holly Creek wat ershed (including Emory Creek watershed) upstream from
Emory Creek to Murray County Road SR826 (U .S. Forest Service line).
4. Mill Creek ( Hassler Mill Creek) watershed within the Holly Creek
watershed.
PAULDING COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Seconda ry:
3. Pumpkinvine Creek watershed upstream from Pau lding County Road 231.
PICKENS COUNTY
Pr ima ry:
2. Talking Rock Creek watershed upstream from Route 51011 (GA Highway
136).
Secondary:
10. Long Swamp Creek watershed upstream from Pickens County Road 294.
POLK COUNTY
Primary:
None.
Secondary:
RABUN COUNTY
Prima ry:
Secondary :
2. Mud Creek downstream from Sky Valley Ski Resort Lake to the Little
Tennessee River.
STEPHENS COUNTY
P r ima ry:
Secondary :
4. Middle Fork Broad River watershed upstream from SCS flood control
structure # 44 to USFS Route 92-B.
5 . North Fork Broad River watershed upstream from SCS flood control
structure # 1.
6. Panther Creek watershed downstream from the mouth of Davidson Creek.
TOWNS COUNTY
Prima ry:
4. Hiawassee River watershed - entire stream and all tribut aries classified as
primary except all streams or sections thereof classified as secondary.
Seconda ry:
UNION COUNTY
Prima ry :
9. Ivylog Creek watershed upstream from USDA Forest Service property line.
10. Nottely River watershed upstream from the mouth of Town Creek.
14. Youngcane Creek watershed upstream from the mouth of Jones Creek.
Seconda ry:
1. All streams or sections thereof except the Butternut Creek watershed and
the Nottely River downstream of Nottely Dam and those classified as
primary.
WALKER COUNTY
Primary:
Se condary :
8. East Fork Little River watershed (flows into Chattooga County; includes
Gilreath Creek).
13. Middle Fork Little River watershed (includes Cannon Branch and Hale
Branch).
14. Rock Creek watershed ( including Sawmill Branch) upstream from Sawmill
Branch .
18. West Chickamauga Creek watershed upstream from Wa lker County Road
107.
WHITE COUNTY
Prima ry:
Secondary:
WHITFIELD COUNTY
Primary:
None .
Seconda ry:
( 16) Waters Ge ne ra lly Supporting She llfish . The waters listed below are either
productive shellfish waters or have the potential to support shellfish. However, it may
not be lawful to harvest shellfish from all of the waters listed below. Shellfish may only
be harvested from waters approved for harvest by the Georgia DNR Coastal Resources
Division. For a current list of approved waters for harvesting, contact the Coastal
Resources Division.
CHATHAM COUNTY
1. Savannah River South Channel at Fort Pulaski to confluence with Lazaretto Creek.
2. Tybee River at confluence with Bates Creek and eastward, including Bates Creek.
4. Herb River at confluence with Wil mington River to Count y Road 890.
5. All waters surrounding Skidaway Island including Moon River North to Skidaway
Island Road.
7. Little Ogeechee River from Rose Dhu Island and eastward excluding Harvey Creek
on Harvey's Island.
8. Ogeechee River below Shad I sland and eastward ( north of center line).
9. All waters surrounding Ossabaw Island and Wassaw I sland to the cent er line of
the intracoastal waterway.
BRYAN COUNTY
1. Ogeechee River below Shad Island and eastward (south of center line).
2. Redbird Creek at Cottonham and eastward.
3. All waters west of main channel center line of intracoastal waterway to confluence
of Medway River.
4. Medway River at south confluence of Sunbury Channel and East Channel and
eastward (north of center line).
LIBERTY COUNTY
1. Medway River at south confluence of Sunbury Channel and East Channel and
eastward (south of center line).
3. Johns Creek at end of County Road 3 and eastward to confluence with Medway
River.
5. North Newport River System at confluence with Carrs Neck Creek and eastward,
including Cross Tide Creek .
6 . South Newport River System north of center line and eastward from confluence
with South Hampton Creek.
MCINTOSH COUNTY
1. South Newport River System south of centerline and eastward from confluence
with South Hampton Creek.
3. Sapelo River from end of County Road 127 eastwa rd excluding White Chimney
River and Savannah Cut.
8. All waters surrounding Sapelo Island to the center line of Sapelo Sound, including
New Teakettle Creek, Old Teakettle Creek and Dark Creek.
11. North River from confluence with Old Darien River to confluence with intracoastal
waterway, including Old Darien River.
12. Darien River from confluence with Three Mile Cut to intracoastalwaterway.
13. Rockdedundy River from confluence with Darien River to intracoastal waterway.
14. All waters surrounding Doboy Island, Commodore Island, Wolf Island, and
Rockdedundy Island.
16 . Altamaha River from confluence with Three Mile Cut and Mackay River and
eastward, including Buttermilk Sound, but excluding South Altamaha River.
GLYNN COUNTY
1. Mackay River water system from confluence with South Altamaha River to
confluence with Brunswick River, excluding Wally's Leg.
2. Al l waters surrounding St. Simons Island and Little St. Simons Island.
4 . Turtle River from confluence with Buffalo River to confluence with South
Brunswick River, excluding Cowpen Creek, Yellow Bluff Creek, and Gibson Creek.
6. Fancy Bluff Creek from confluence with South Brunswick River to the Little Satilla
River.
7 . Brunswick River from confluence of Turtle River and South Brunswick River to St.
Simons Sound.
8. Little Satilla River from confluence with Fancy Bluff Creek to St. Andrews Sound
(north of center line).
9. All waters surrounding Jekyll Island, Jointer Island, and Colonels Island.
CAMDEN COUNTY
1. Little Satilla River from confluence with Fancy Bluff Creek to St. Andrews Sound
(south of center line), excluding Maiden Creek.
2. Umbrella Creek from confluence with Dover Creek below Dover Bluff.
3 . Dover Creek from confluence with Umbrella Creek to confluence with Satilla River.
4. Satilla River near Floyd Basin and unnamed cut over to Dover Creek to St.
Andrews Sound.
5 . Floyd Basin at confluence with Todd Creek to confluence with Satilla River.
6. Floyd Basin at confluence with Todd Creek to confluence wit h Cumberland River.
9 . Cumberland River from confluence of St. Andrews Sound to confluence with St.
Marys River (north of center line).
10. North River from County Road 75 to confluence with St . Marys River.
12. St. Marys River (north of center line) from end of Stat e Road 40 to Cumberland
Sound .
( 17) Specific Criteria for Lakes and Major Lake Tributaries . In add it ion to t he general
criteria, the following lake specific criteria are deemed necessary and shall be required
for the specific water usage as shown:
(a) West Point Lake: Those waters impounded by West Point Dam and downstream
of U.S . 27 at Franklin.
(i) Chlorophyll a: For the months of April through October, the average of
monthly photic zone composite sa mples shall not exceed the chlorophyll a
concentrations at the locations listed below more than once in a five-year
period .
1. Upstream from the Dam in the Forebay 22 µg/L
2. LaGrange Water Intake 24 µg/L
(i ii) Total Nitrogen : Not to exceed 4.0 m g/L as Nitrogen in the photic zone.
(iv) TotalPhosphorous: Total lake loading shall not exceed 2.4 pounds per
acre foot of lake volume per year.
(v) Bacteria:
1. U.S. 27 at Franklin to New River: Fecal coliform bacteria shall not
exceed the Fishing criterion as presented in 391-3 -6;:.03(6)(c)(iii) .
2. New River to West Point Dam: E. coli shall not exceed the
Recreation criterion as presented in 391 - 3-6- .03(6)(b)(i).
(vi) Dissolved Oxygen: A daily average of 5.0 mg/Land no less than 4.0
mg/Lat all times at the depth specified in 391 -3- 6-.03(5)(g).
(viii) Major Lake Tributaries: For the following tributaries, the annual total
phosphorus loading to West Point Lake shall not exceed the following:
1. Yellow Jacket Creek at Hammet Road: 11,000 pounds
2. New River at Hwy 100 : 14,000 pounds
3. Chattahoochee River at U.S. 27: 1,400,000 pounds
(b) Lake Walter F. George: Those waters impounded by Walter F. George Dam and
upstream to Georgia Highway 39 near Omaha.
(i) Chlorophyll a: For the months of April through October, the average of
monthly photic zone composite samples shall not exceed 18 µg/L at mid-
river at U.S. Highway 82 or 15 µg/L at mid-river in the dam forebay more
than once in a five-year period.
(iii) Total Nitrogen: Not to exceed 3.0 mg/Las nitrogen in the photic zone.
(iv) Total Phosphorous: Total lake loading shall not exceed 2.4 pounds per
acre-foot of lake volume per year.
(v) Bacteria:
1. Georgia Highway 39 to Cowikee Creek: Fecal coliform bacteria shall
not exceed the Fishing criterion as presented in 391-3-6-
.03(6)(c)(iii).
(vi) Dissolved Oxygen: A dally average of no less than 5.0 mg/Land no less
than 4.0 mg/Lat al l times at the depth specified in 391-3 -6-.03(5)(g).
( c) Lake Jackson: Those waters impounded by Lloyd Shoals Dam and upstream to
Georgia Highway 36 on the South and Yellow Rivers, upstream to Newton
Factory Bridge Road on the Alcovy River and upstream to Georgia Highway 36 on
Tussahaw Creek .
(i) Chlorophyll a: For the months of April through October, the average of
monthly mid-channel photic zone composite samples shall not exceed 20
µg/L at a location approximately 2 miles downstream of the confluence of
the South and Yellow Rivers at the junction of Butts, Newton and Jasper
Counties more than once in a five- year period .
(ii i) Total Nitrogen: Not to exceed 4.0 mg/Las nitrogen in the photic zone .
(iv) Total Phosphorous: Total lake loading shall not exceed 5.5 pounds per
acre-foot of lake volume per year.
(v) Bacteria: E. coli shall not exceed the Recreation criterion as presented in
391-3-6 -.03(6 )(b )(i).
(viii ) Major Lake Tributaries: For the following major tributaries, the annual
total phosphorous loading to Lake Jackson shall not exceed the
following:
1. South River at Island Shoals: 179,000 pounds
2. Yellow River at Georgia Highway 212: 116,000 pounds
3 . Alcovy River at Newton Factory Bridge Road : 55,000 pounds
4. Tussahaw Creek at Fincherville Road.: 7,000 pounds
(d) Lake Allatoona: Those waters impounded by Allatoona Dam and upstream to
State Highway 5 on the Etowah River, State Highway 5 on Little River, the Lake
Acworth Dam, and the confluence of Little Allatoona Creek and Allatoona Creek.
Other impounded tributaries to an elevation of 840 feet mean sea level
corresponding to the normal pool elevation of Lake Allatoona.
(i) Chlorophyll a: For the months of April through October, the average of
monthly mid -channel photic zone composite samples shall not exceed the
chlorophyll a concentrations at the locations listed below more than once
in a five -year period :
1. Upstream from the Dam 10 µg/L
2. Allatoona Creek upstream from 1-75 12 µg/L
3. Mid -Lake downstream from Kellogg Creek 10 µg/L
4. Little River upstream from Highway 205 15 µg/L
5. Etowah River upstream from Sweetwater Creek 14 µg/L
(iv) Total Phosphorous: Total lake loading shall not exceed 1.3 pounds per
acre- foot of lake volume per year.
(v} Bacteria:
1. Etowah River, State Highway 5 to State Highway 20: Fecal coliform
bacteria shall not exceed the Fishing Criterion as presented in 391 -
3- 6- .03(6 )( c)(iii).
(vi) Dissolved Oxygen: A dally average of 5.0 mg/Land no less than 4.0
mg/Lat all times at the depth specified in 391-3-6-.03(5)(g}.
(vii} Temperature:
1. Etowah River, State Highway 5 to State Highway 20: Water
temperature shall not exceed the Fishing criterion as presented in
391 - 3- 6- .03(6)(c)(iv}.
(viii} Major Lake Tributaries: For the following major tributaries, the annual
total phosphorous loading to Lake Allatoona shall not exceed the
following:
Etowah River at State Highway 5 spur and 140, at the 340,000
1
· USGS gage lbs/yr
2. Little River at State Highway 5 (Highway 754) 42,000 lbs/yr
3 . Noonday Creek at North Rope Mill Road 38,000 lbs/yr
4. Shoal Creek at State Highway 108 (Fincher Road) 12,500 lbs/yr
( e) Lake Sidney Lanier: Those waters impounded by Buford Dam and upstream to
Belton Bridge Road on the Chattahoochee River, 0.6 miles downstream from
State Road 400 on the Chestatee River, as well as other impounded tributaries to
an elevation of 1070 feet mean sea level corresponding to the normal pool
elevation of Lake Sidney Lanier.
(i) Chlorophyll a: For the months of April through October, the average of
monthly mid-channel photic zone composite samples shall not exceed the
chlorophyll a concentrations at the locations listed below more than once
in a five-year period:
1. Upstream from the Buford Dam forebay 5 µg/l
2. Upstream from the Flowery Branch confluence 6 µg/L
3. At Browns Bridge Road (State Road 369) 7 µg/L
4. At Bolling Bridge (State Road 53) on Chestatee River 10 µg/L
5. At Lanier Bridge (State Road 53) on Chattahoochee River 10 µg/L
(iii) Total Nitrogen: Not to exceed 4 mg/Las nitrogen in the photic zone.
(iv) Total Phosphorous : Total lake loading shall not exceed 0.25 pounds per
acre-foot of lake volume per year.
(v) Bacteria: E. coli shall not exceed the Recreation criterion as presented in
391-3-6- .03( 6 )(b )(i).
(vi) Dissolved Oxygen: A daily average of 5.0 mg/Land no less than 4.0
mg/Lat all times at the depth specified in 391-3-6-.03(5)(g).
(vii i) Major Lake Tributaries : For the following major tributaries, the annual
total phosphorous loading to Lake Sidney Lanier shall not exceed the
following:
1. Chattahoochee River at Belton Bridge Road 178,000 pounds
2. Chestatee River at Georgia Highway 400 118,000 pounds
3. Flat Creek at McEver Road 14,400 pounds
(f) Carters Lake : Those waters impounded by Carters Dam and upstream on the
Coosawattee River as well as other impounded tributaries to an elevation of 1072
feet mean sea level corresponding to the normal pool elevation of Carters Lake.
(i) Chlorophyll a: For the months of April through October, the average of
monthly mid-channel photic zone composite samples shall not exceed the
chlorophyll a concentrations at the locations listed below more than once
in a five-year period:
1. Carters Lake upstream from Woodring Branch 10 µg/L
2. Carters Lake at Coosawattee River embayment mouth 10 µg/L
(iii) Total Nitrogen: Not to exceed 4.0 mg/Las nitrogen in the photic zone.
(iv) Total Phosphorous: Total lake loading shall not exceed 172,500 pounds or
0.46 pounds per acre-foot of lake volume per year.
(v) Bacteria: E. coli shall not exceed the Recreation criterion as presented in
391-3 - 6- .03( 6)(b )(i).
(vi) Dissolved Oxygen: A daily average of 5.0 mg/Land no less than 4.0
mg/Lat all times at the depth specified in 391 -3-6- .03(5)(9).
(viii) Major Lake Tributaries: For the following major tributaries, the annual
total phosphorous loading at the compliance monitoring location shal l
not exceed the following:
1. Coosawattee River at Old Highway 5 151,500 pounds
2 . Mountaintown Creek at U.S. Highway 76 16,000 pounds
(18) Effective Date. This rule shall become effective twenty days after filing with the
Secretary of State's office.
Cite as Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 391-3-6-. 03
Authority: O.C.G.A. Sec. 12-5-20 et seq.
History. Original Rule entitled "Water Use Classifications and Water Qua lity Standa rds"
adopted. F. June 10, 1974; eff. June 30, 1974.
Amended: F. May 30, 1985; eff. June 19, 1985.
Amended: F. Dec. 9, 1988; eff. Dec. 29, 1988.
Amended: F. May 31, 1989; eff. June 20, 1989.
Amended: ER . 391-3-6-0 . 16-.03 adopted. F. July 6, 1989; eff. June 30, 1989, the date of
adoption .
Amended: ER. 391-3-6-0.17-.03 adopted. F. Aug. 25, 1989, eff. Aug. 23, 1989, the date of
adoption.
Amended: ER. 391-3-6-0.19-.03 adopted. F. Dec. 8, 1989, eff. Dec. 6, 1989, the date of
adoption .
Amended: F. Dec. 8, 1989 ; eff. Dec. 28, 1989.
Amended: F. Apr. 3, 1990; eff. Apr. 23, 1990.
Amended: F. Feb. 15, 1991; eff. Mar. 7, 1991.
Amended: F. Apr. 8, 1993; eff. Apr. 28, 1993.
Amended: F. Aug. 9, 1993; eff. Aug . 29, 1993.
Amended: F. Aug. 30, 1995; eff. Sept. 19, 1995.
Amended: ER. 391-3-6-0 .32-.03 adopted. F. May 1, 1996; eff. Apr. 25, 1996, the date of
adoption.
Amended: Permanent Rule adopted. F. July 10, 1996; eff. July 30, 1996.
Amended: F. Oct. 17, 1996; eff. Nov. 6, 1996.
Amended: F. May 2, 1997; eff. May 22, 1997.
Amended: F. Nov. 3, 1998; eff. Nov. 23, 1998 .
Amended: F. Feb. 7, 2000; eff. Feb . 27, 2000 .
Amended: F. Apr. 12, 2000; eff. May 2, 2000.
Amended: F. Oct. 26, 2001; eff. Nov. 15, 2001.
Amended: F. May 10, 2002; eff. May 30, 2002.
Amended: F. July 2, 2002; eff. July 22, 2002.
Amended: F. Dec. 9, 2002; eff. Dec. 29, 2002.
Amended: F. Nov. 7, 2005; eff. Nov. 27, 2005.
Amended : F. Dec. 14, 2007; eff. Jan. 3, 2008.
Amended: F. Jan. 29, 2009; eff. Feb. 18, 2009.
Amended: F. May 16, 2011; eff. June 5, 2011.
Amended: F. Oct. 2, 2013; eff. Oct. 22, 2013 .
Amended: New t itle "Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards." F. Oct. 2,
2015; eff. Oct. 22, 2015.
Rule 391-3-6-.06. Waste Treatment and Permit
Requirements. Amended
(1) Purpose. The purpose of this Paragraph 391 -3- 6- .06 is to provide for the degree of
waste treatment required and the uniform procedures and practices to be followed
relating to the application for issuance, modification, revocation and reissuance, and
termination of permits for the discharge of any pol lutant into the waters of the State.
Requirements applicable to general NPDES permits are provided in subparagraphs 391- 3-
§::.J..5. and 391- 3-6- .16.
(2) Definitions. All terms used in this Paragraph shall be interpreted In accordance with the
definitions as set forth in the Act unless otherwise defined in this Paragraph or in any
other Paragraph of these Rules:
(a) "Annua l average stream flow" means that flow measured dai ly at the nearest
listed U.S. Geologic Survey stream gauge, averaged for the entire period of
record, and adjusted by comparison to the size of the drainage area in which the
discharge is located.
{b) " Aquaculture project" means any point source which meets the criteria set forth in
the Federal Regu lations, 40 C.F.R. 122.25;
(c) "Concentrated anima I feeding operation" means any point source which meets
the criteria set forth in the Federal Regulations, 40 C. F.R. 122.23;
(d) "Concentrat ed aquatic animal production facility" means any point source which
meets the criteria set forth in the Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.24;
(f) "Dilution factor" means a numerical representation of the dilution of the permitted
effluent from the wastewater treatment facili t y in the receiving stream. It shall be
used to calculate lnstream concentrations of priority pollutants when the effluent
concentration is known and to ca lculate effluent limitations from the instream
criteria concentration listed in 391 - 3-6-. 03(5)(e).
1. For constituents and their criteria listed in 391- 3-6- .03(S)(e}Ci) and (iii) and
for constituents and their chronic criteria in 391-3-6-.03(5)( e)(ii) , the
dilution factor equals:
For constituents and their acute criteria listed in 391 - 3-6-. 03(S)(e)(ii), the
dilution factor for the calculation of effluent limitations equals:
2. The dilution factor equations assume a relatively rapid and complex mix. In
situations where this does not occur, the Permittee or EPD may perform field
studies to document and describe the mixing zone. The dilution factor in
such situations, for the purpose of calculating effluent limitations for
chemical constitutents, wi ll be determined based on the studies. If a mixing
zone is granted, all criteria and requirements of subsection 391-3- 6- .03(10)
must also be met.
(g) "Effluent Limitation" means any restriction or prohibition established under the Act
on quantities, rates, or concentrations, or a combination thereof, of chemical,
physical, biological, or other constituents which are discharged from point sources
into the waters of the State, including, but not limited to, schedules of compliance
and whole effluent biological monitoring requirements;
(h) " EPD" means the Environmental Protection Division of the Georgia Department of
Natural Resources;
(j) "Major discharger" as defined in EPA annual operating guidance for the EPA
Regional Offices and the States and specifically listed in the annual State program
plan;
(k) "New discharger" means any point source that meets the criteria set forth in the
Federa l Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.29;
( I) "New Source" means any point source that meets the criteria set forth in the
Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.29;
(m) "NPDES Permit Application" means the application filed by any person with the
Director for an NPDES Permit;
(n) "NPDES Permit" means the permit issued by the Division to regulate the discharge
of pollutants from any point source into the waters of the State;
(o) "Segment" means a portion of a water quality planning area, the surface waters of
which have common hydrologic characteristics (or flow regulation patterns);
common natural physical, chemical and biological characteristics and processes;
and common reactions to external stresses, such as the discharge of pollutants.
Segments will be classified as either a water quality segment or an effluent
limitation segment as follows:
1. Water quality segment. Any segment where it is known that water quality
does not meet applicable water qual ity standards and/ or is not expected to
meet applicable water quality standards even after the application of the
effluent limitations required by sections 301(b)(l)(B) and 301(b)(2)(A) of
the Act;
(p) "Separate storm sewer" means any point source which meets the criteria set forth
in the Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.26 .
(q) "Silvicultural point source" means any point source which meets the criteria set
forth in the Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.27;
(b) Any person discharging or proposing to discharge any pollutant from a non -point
source into the waters of the State, under the circumstances described in
O.C.G.A . Section 12-5-30(b), shall obtain written approval from the EPD and shall
be required to use best management practices to minimize to the extent feasible
as determ ined by the EPD the introduction of the pollutant into the waters of the
State. The best management practices shall be included in a permit, if the
Director has issued one to the same person for a point source discharge.
(c) Any person owning or operating a treatment works, from which a discharge into
the waters of the State could possibly occur, excluding discharges which could
result from Acts of God, shall apply to the EPD for a permit.
6. Criteria and standards for imposing conditions for the disposal of sewage
sludge established by EPA pursuant to Section 405 of the Federal Act;
11. With regard to any non-point source required to obtain a permit, such best
management practices as are required to ensure compliance with
applicable State water quality standards.
(b) Calculations and specification of effluent limits and standards shall be made in
accordance with the provisions of Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.44 and
122.45.
(c) The foregoing requirements shall be applied in considering all applications made
pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section 12- 5-30, and no such application will be approved
unless the waste treatment faci lities contemplated thereby will achieve such
limitations and standards upon completion thereof or within such reasonable time
thereafter as the EPD may provide, consistent with subparagraph 391 -3 -6-
.06(10).
(d) Until such time as such criteria, standards, limitations, and prohibitions are
promulgated pursuant to Sections 301, 302, 303, 304(e), 306, 307 and 405 of the
Federal Act, the EPD shall apply such standards, limitations and prohibitions
necessary to achieve the purposes of said sections of the Federal Act. With
respect to individual point sources, such limitations, standards, or prohibitions
shall be based upon an assessment of technology and processes, towit:
1. To existing point sources, other than publicly owned treatment works,
effluent limitations based on application of the best practicable control
technology currently available;
2. To publicly owned treatment works, effluent limitations based upon the
application of secondary treatment or treatment equivalent to secondary
treatment in accordance with Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 133.102 and
.105;
3. To any point source, other than publicly owned treatment works, whose
construction commences after the initial effective date of this Paragraph,
and for which there are not new source performance standards, effluent
limitations which reflect the greatest degree of effluent reduction which the
EPD determines to be achievable through application of the best available
demonstrated control technology, processes, operating methods, or other
alternatives, including, where practicable, a standard permitting no
discharge of pollutants, consistent with 40 C.F.R . 125 .3(c)(2) .
CHEMICAL CONSTITUENT
1. Methoxychlor
4. Antimony
5. Arsenic
6 . Beryllium
7. Cadmium
8. Chromium (III)
9. Chromium (VI)
10. Copper
11. Lead
12. Mercury
13. Nickel
14. Selenium
15. Silver
16. Thallium
17. Zinc
18. Cyanide
19. Acrolein
21. Benzene
24. Chlorobenzene
26 . Chloroethane
29. Dichlorobromomethane
31. 1,2-Dichloroethane
33. 1,2-Dichloropane
34
34.. 1,3-Dichloropropylene
38
38.. Methyl Chloride
Chloride (Chloromethane)
39. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
40. Tetrachloroethylene
4 1.
41. Toluene
42 .
42. Dichloroethylene
1,2-Trans- Dichloroethylene
43
43.. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
44 .
44. 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
45. Trichloroethylene
47. 2-Chlorophenol
48. 2,4-Dichlorophenol
49
49.. 2,4-Dimethylphenol
52. 2-Nitrophenol
53. 4-Nitrophenol
54
54.. 3-Methyl-4-Chlorophenol
3-Methyl -4-Chlorophenol
55
55.. Pentachlorophenol
Penta ch lorophenol
56.
56. Phenol
57. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
58
58.. Acenaphthene
59. Acenaphthylene
60. Anthracene
61. Benzidine
62. Benzo(a)Anthracene
66 . Benzo( k) Fl uoranthene
73 . 2-Chloronaphthalene
75. Chrysene
78 . 1, 3-Dich lorobenzene
79. 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,6-Dinitroto luene
85. . 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
85
86.
86. Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
87.
87. 1,2-Dipheny lhydrazine
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
88.
88. Fluoranthen
Fluoranthenee
89.
89. Fluorene
90.
90. Hexachlorob enzene
Hexachlorobenzene
91.
91. Hexachlorob utadiene
Hexachlorobutadiene
92.
92. Hexachloro- cyclopentad
Hexachloro- iene
cyclopentadiene
93.
93. Hexachloroe thane
Hexachloroethane
94. . Indeno(
94 Indeno(1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
95.
95. Isophorone
96.
96. Naphthalene
97.
97. Nitrobenzen
Nitrobenzenee
98.
98. N-Nitrosodim ethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
99.
99. N-Nitrosod
N-Nitrosodi-n- Propylamine
i- n- Propylamine
100.
100. N-Nitrosodip henylamlne
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
101.
101. Phenanthren
Phenanthrenee
102.
102. Pyrene
103.
103. 1,2,4-Trichlo robenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
104. Aldrin
104.
105. a-BHC-Alpha
105.
106. b-BHC-Beta
106.
107.
107. Lindane
Undane [Hexachlorocyclohexane (g-BHC-Gam ma)]
[ Hexachloroc yclohexane (g-BHC-Gamma)]
108.
108. d-BHC- Delta
d-BHC-Delta
109. Chlordane
113. Dieldrin
114. a-Endosulfan
11 5. b-Endosulfan
117. Endrin
119. Heptachlor
121. PCBs
122 . Toxaphene
(f) For any metals monitored during any portion of the limits
determination process, measurement will be by the most
appropriate analytical technique approved by the U.S. EPA
which provides a measurement of the portion of the metal
present which may cause toxicity to aquatic life in the
receiving stream.
(b) 1, 1-Dichloroethane
( c) 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
(d ) 2- Nitrophenol
(e) 4-Nitrophenol
(f ) Bis{2-Chloroethoxy) Methane
(i) 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
(k) Naphthalene
(I) d-BHC-Delta
(m) Silver
(n) Beryllium
(q) 3-Methyl-4-Chlorophenol
( r) Acena phthylene
(iv) The criteria concentration may be more stringent under either one
of the following situations:
(a) If the chemical constituent exists in the upstream reaches of
the receiving stream at any level greater than zero due to
the presence of other direct dischargers. For this situation,
the criteria concentration for computation of the effluent
limit will be the net value after subtracting out this initial
concentration. Unless actual water quality studies and
monitoring or calculations indicate otherwise, it will be
assumed that the upstream levels of each constituent are
zero; or
(vii) Permits issued or reissued after the adoption of this paragraph may
include site specific temporary exceptions to the applicable water
quality standards under Chapter 391-3-6-.03(5)(e) when the
requirements of this paragraph are met and the temporary
exception is specifically authorized herein. Where a discharger
cannot meet applicable limits for whole effluent toxicity because of
a water quality based whole effluent toxicity criteria, site- specific
temporary exceptions may be allowed on effluent dominated
receiving streams under 7-day, 10-year minimum stream flow
(7Q10) conditions provided that it has been demonstrated that the
permitted discharge will comply with all chemical specific and other
applicable water quality criteria, that the receiving stream will
support a balanced indigenous population of aquatic life, and that
controls more stringent than those required by Section 30 l(b) and
306 of the Federal Act for achieving whole effluent toxicity criteria
would result in substantial and widespread adverse economic and
social impacts to the affected communities. These site- specific
exceptions shall be applicable only to the wastewater discharge as
permitted at the time the exception is authorized with no changes
in process or wastewater characteristics that would adversely affect
water quality in the receiving stream or adversely affect the ability
of potential new pollution abatement technologies to attain
compliance with the whole effluent toxicity criteria. These site-
specific exceptions shall be reviewed consistent with 40 CFR 13 1.20
at least once in every 3- year period. If it is determined that
feasible new pollution abat ement technologies or alternatives have
become avai lable to allow compliance with whole effluent toxicity
criteria, these site-specific exceptions may be revoked and the
NPDES permits mod ified to require implementation of such
pollution abatement technologies or alternatives as soon as
reasonably practicable. Along with this permit modification will be a
requirement for the permittee to comp ly with the water quality
based whole effluent toxicity criteria after installation of these
technologies .
( ii) Ten years from the date the source begins to discharge process or
other nonconstruction related wastewater; or
(b) Engineering reports, plans, specifications, and other material submitted to the
EPD shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision or review of, and bear
the seal of, a Professional Engineer competent in the field of sewage and industrial
waste treatment. At no time shall this requirement be in conflict with O.C.G.A.
Section 43-15 governing the practices of professional engineering and surveying.
(d) Any State or NPDES Permit Application form submitted to the EPD shall be signed
as follows in accordance with the Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.22:
1. For a corporation, by a responsible corporate officer. For this subparagraph
a responsible corporate officer means:
(i) a president , secretary, treasurer, or vice president of the corporation
in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who
performs similar policy- or decision making functions for the
corporation, or
3 . For a municipa lity, State, Federal, or other public facil ity, by either a
principal executive officer or ranking elected official.
(e) All other reports or requests for information required by the permit issuing
authority shall be signed by a person designated in (d) above or a duly authorized
representative of such person, if:
1. The representative so authorized is responsible for the overall operation of
the facility from which the discharge originates, e.g ., a plant manager,
superintendent or person of equivalent responsibility;
(g) Any person signing any document under (d) or (e) above shall make the following
certification: I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments
were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted . Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage
the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,
the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete . I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for
knowing violations.
(h) All municipal discharges with permitted flows equal to or greater than one million
gallons per day, or with an approved pretreatment program, or that are required
to develop a pretreatment program, must submit with the application results of
valid whole effluent toxicity testing .
1. This testing must be conducted using EPA's methods or other established
protocols which are scientifically defensible and sufficiently sensitive to
detect aquatic toxicity. Such testing must have been conducted since the
last NPDES permit reissuance or major modification.
2. In addition to the dischargers listed above, the Director may require other
municipa l dischargers to submit the results of toxicity tests with their
permit applications, based on considerations which the Director determines
could cause or contribute to adverse water qua lity impacts.
(b) Copies of the complete NPDES Permit Application received by the EPD shall be
transmitted to the Regional Administrator for any comment in such manner as the
Director and the Regional Administrator shall agree.
(c) The EPD shall receive any relevant data collected by the Regional Administrator
prior to the EPD's participation in the NPDES in such manner as the Director and
the Regional Administrator shall agree.
(ii) A copy of the public notice shall be mailed to the permit applicant
and a copy shall be available at the EPD office in Atlanta;
(ii i) Mailing of the public notice to any person or group upon written
request including persons solicited from area lists from past permit
proceedings. The EPD shall maintain a mailing list for distribution of
public notices and fact sheet. Any person or group may request that
their names be added to the mailing list. The request should be in
writing to the EPD office in Atlanta and shall be renewed in
December of each year. Failure to renew the request shall result in
the removal of such name from the mailing list;
(iv) The EPD shall provide a period of not less than thirty (30) days
following the date of the public notice in which interested persons
may submit their written views on the tentative determination with
respect to the NPDES Permit Application. All written comment
submitted during the thirty (30) day comment period will be
retained by the EPD and considered in the final determination with
respect to the permit application and shall be responded to in
accordance with Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 124.17. The
comment period may be extended at the discretion of the Director;
(v) The contents of the public notice will be in accordance with Federal
Regulations, 40 C.F.B. 124.lO(d);
(vi) The EPD will prepare and distribute a fact sheet in accordance with
Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 124.8 and 124.56 and applicable
State laws. A copy of the fact sheet will be available for public
inspection at the EPD office in Atlanta . Any person may request in
writing a copy of the fact sheet and it will be provided. The EPD
shall add the name of any person or group upon request to the
mailing list to receive copies of fact sheet;
(viii) The Director will mail a copy of the public notice to the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Federal and State agencies with jurisdiction
over fish, shellfish and wildlife resources and to other appropriate
governmental authorities and will provide such agencies an
opportunity to submit their written views and recommendations in
accordance with Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 124.10 and
applicable State laws. The comments of the District Engineer of the
Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National
Marine Fisheries Service, or any State or Federal Agency with
jurisdiction over fish, wildlife, or public health shall be considered
in accordance with Federal Regulations . 40 C.F.R. 122.59;
(ix) Copies of the proposed permits shall be transmitted to the Regional
Administrator for review and comments in such manner as the
Director and Regional Administrator shall agree;
(x) The EPD shall transmit to the Regional Administrator a copy of every
issued NPDES Permit, immediately following issuance, along with
any and all terms, conditions, requirements or documents which are
part of such permit or which affect the authorization by the permit
of the discharge of pollutants.
2. Any public hearing held pursuant to this subparagraph shall be held in the
geographical area of the proposed discharge or other appropriate location at
the discretion of the Director;
3. The Director may hold one public hearing on related groups of permit
applications;
(b) No NPDES Permit shall be issued authorizing any of the following discharges:
1. The discharge of any radiological, chemical, or biological warfare agent or
high- level radioactive waste into navigable waters;
2. Any discharge which in the judgment of the Secretary of the Army would
substantially impair anchorage and navigation in or on any of the waters of
the United States;
5. Any discharge to the territorial sea, the waters of the contiguous zone, or
the oceans in the following circumstances:
(i) Prior to the promulgation of the guidelines under section 403( c) of
the Act, unless the Director determines permit issuance to be in the
public interest; or
(c) The terms and conditions specified on the permit issued shall be in accordance
with Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.41, 122.42 and 122.44 and applicable
State laws and regulations promulgated thereunder.
(d) The issuance of a permit does not:
1. Convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges;
2. Any new introduction of poll utants into such a treatment works from an
indirect discharger subject to Section 301 of the Federal Act if it were
directly discharging those pollutants;
{b) If the permit is for a discharge from a publicly owned treatment works, the
permittee shall require any indirect discharger to such treatment works to comply
with the requirements of Sections 204(b ), 307, and 308 of the Federal Act,
including any requirement established under 40 C.F.R . 403. As a means of
ensuring compliance with Section 307 of the Federal Act, the permittee shall
require each indirect discharger subject to the requirements of said Section 307 to
forward to the Director periodic notice of progress (over intervals not to exceed 9
months) toward full compliance with Section 307 requirements.
(c) If the permit is for a discharge from a publicly owned treatment works, the
permittee shall identify, in terms of character and volume of pollutant, any
significant ind irect dischargers into such treatment works subject to pretreatment
standards under Section 307(b) of the Federal Act and 40 C.F.R. 403.
(b) In any case where the period of time for compliance specified in subparagraph
391 - 3- 6- .06(10)(a) of these Rules exceeds 9 months, a schedule of compliance
shall be specified which will set forth interim requirements and the dates for their
achievement. In no event sha ll more than 9 months elapse between interim
dates, and, to the extent practicable, the interim dates shall fall on the last day
of the months of March, June, September, and December.
(c) Within fourteen (14) days after an interim date of compliance of the fi nal date of
compliance, the permittee shall provide the Director with written notice of its
compliance or non-compliance wit h the requirements or conditions specified to
be complet ed by such date. Failure to submit the written notice is just cause for
the EPD to pursue enforcement action pursuant to the Act.
(d) On the last working day of February, May, August, and November t he Director
shall submit to EPA information concerning noncompliance with NPDES Permit
requirements by major dischargers in the State.
(e) Any discharger who fails or refuses to comply with an interim or final date of
compliance specified in a permit may be deemed by the Director to be in
v iolation of the permit and may be subject to enforcement action pursuant to the
Act.
Any discharge authorized by a permit issued pursuant to the Act may be subject to such
monitoring, recording and reporting requirements as may be reasonably required by the
Director including the installation, use and maintenance of monitoring equipment or
methods; specific requirements for recording of monitoring activities and results; and
periodic reporting of monitoring results. The monitoring, recording and reporting
requirements shall be specified in a permit when issued, provided, however, the Director
may require additional monitoring, recording and reporting by written notification to the
permittee.
(a) The monitoring requirements of any discharge authorized by any such permit
shall be consistent with Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.41, 122.42, and
122.44 and applicable State laws.
( b) Any permit which requires monitoring of the author ized discharge shall comply
with the recording requirement specified by Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R.
122.41 and applicable State laws . The permittee shall be required to retain any
records of monitoring activities and results for a minimum of th ree (3) years,
unless otherwise required or extended by the Director upon written notification .
(c) Any holder of a permit which requires monitoring of the authorized discharge
shall report periodicall y to the EPD the results of all required monitoring activities
on appropriate forms supplied by the EPD. The Director shall notify the permittee
of the frequency of reporting but in no case sha ll the reporting frequency be less
than once per year.
(c) In the case of a POTW which has received a grant under Section 202(a)(3) of the
Federal Act to fund 100% of the costs to modify or replace facilities construct ion
with a grant for innovative and alternative wastewater technology under Section
202(a)(2), the schedu le of compliance may be modified to reflect the amount of
time lost during construction of the innovative or alternative facility. In no case
shall the compliance schedule be modified or extend beyond an applicable
statutory deadline for compliance.
(d) New sources, new dischargers, sources which recommence discharging after
terminating operations and those sources which had been indirect dischargers
which commence discharging directly into navigable waters do not qualify for
compliance schedules under this paragraph and are subject of Federal
Regulations, 40 C.F.R. 122.29(d){4).
(14) Control of Disposal of Pollutants into Wells. If the permit proposes to discharge to
a well or subsurface water, the Director shall specify additiona l terms and conditions
which sha ll (a) prohibit the proposed disposa l, or (b) control the proposed disposal in
order to prevent pollution of ground and surface water resources and to protect the
public health and welfare . Any perm it issued for the disposal of pollutants into wells
shall comply with Federal Regulations, and applicable State laws.
3. The Director within thirty (30) days does not notify the current permittee
and the new permittee of the EPD's intent to modify, revoke and re issue,
or terminate the permit and to require that a new application be filed
rather than agreeing to the transfer of the permit.
(c) When the permittee has submitted a timely and sufficient application for a new
NPDES permit and the Director is unable, through no fault of the permittee, to
issue the new permit before the expiration date of the existing permit, then the
Director shall extend the existing permit until a new permit is issued.
( d) For those industrial categories for which EPA will establish effluent limitations
based on best available technology, permits will be issued to ensure compliance
with the effluent limit by the statutory deadline. This will be accomplished by
utilizing short-term permits and/or reopener clauses that will allow the permit to
be modified, revoked, reissued to comply with limitations promulgated pursuant
to the Act and subsequent regulations.
( 16) Enforcement. Any person who violates any provision of the Act, any rule promulgated
and adopted pursuant thereto, or any term, condition, schedule or compliance or other
requirements contained in a permit issued pursuant to the Act shall be subject to
enforcement proceedings pursuant to the Act.
( 17) Outfall Identification. In order to provide the public with information as to the
location of permitted outfalls in State waters and to provide the public with a way to
contact appropriate persons regarding questions and concerns about these outfalls, the
following persons or entitles are required to identify their permitted outfall(s) to the
waters of the State:
1) any person or entity that has been issued an NPDES permit by the Division for a
point source discharge of treated process wastewater or treated domestic sewage
to waters of the State
2) any person or entity that has an NPDES permit for the discharge of cooling water
and that discharges one million gallons or more of cooling water per day. The
outfalls are to be identified by attaching a sign to the outfall or by posting a sign
adjacent to the outfall in such a way that the sign shall be visible from the
receiving water. Should the outfall be submerged, then the sign shall be posted
on the bank as close to the outfall as possible . The sign shall be made of
materials that are durable to typical weather conditions . At a minimum, the sign
shall be 15 inches square. For facilities that discharge sanitary wastewater, the
sign shall include the following information:
2) the facility name including the name of the government body if owned by a local
government
3) the words "Permit # " followed by the last five digits of the facility's NPDES Permit
number
6) EPD's name and phone number. For facilities that discharge treated process
wastewater or cooling water, the sign shall include the following information :
2) the words "Permit # " followed by the last five digits of the facility's NPDES Permit
Number
4) EPD's name and phone number. In the case of permittees who have been issued
a general permit instead of an individual permit, EPD will provide the permittee
with a unique 5 digit number to use as a permit number on the sign . The sign is
to be posted no later than 12 months after the effective date of this rule and it is
to be properly maintained from that point forward. Provided that a good faith
effort is made and documented by the person or entity to maintain such sign, the
person or entity shall be deemed in compliance with this Rule and the Georgia
Water Quality Control Act. The requirement to identify an outfall will not apply if
any of the following conditions apply :
1) If the posting of the sign would be inconsistent with any other State or Federal
Statute
( 18) Effective dat e. This Ru le shall become effective twenty days after fi ling with the
Secretary of State's office.
Cite as Ga . Comp. R. & Regs. R. 391- 3-6-.06
Authority: O.C.G.A. Sec. 12- 5-20 et seq.
History. Or igina l Rule entitled "Waste Treatment and Permit Requirements" adopted. F.
June 10, 1974; eff. June 30, 1974.
Repealed: New Ru le of the same title adopted . F. June 24, 1980; eff. July 14, 1980.
Amended: F. Dec. 9, 1988; eff. Dec. 29, 1988.
Amended : ER 391-3-6-0.18-.06 adopted . F. Aug . 25, 1989; eff. Aug. 23 1 1989, the date of
adoption.
Amended: F. Dec. 8, 1989; eff. Dec. 28, 1989.
Amend ed : F. Apr. 3, 1990; eff. Apr. 23, 1990.
Amended : F. July 6, 1990; eff. July 26, 1990.
Amended: F. Feb. 15, 1991; eff. Mar. 7, 1991.
Ame nded: F. Apr. 8, 1993; eff. Apr. 28, 1993.
Amended: F. May 9, 1994; eff. May 29, 1994.
Amended: F. Aug. 30, 1995; eff. Sept.19, 1995.
Am ende d : ER. 391-3-6-0 .32- .06 adopted. F. May 1, 1996; eff. Apr. 25, 1996, the date of
adoption.
Amended: Permanent Ru le adopted. F. July 10, 1996; eff. July 30, 1996.
Amended: F. May 2, 1997; eff. May 22, 1997 .
Ame nd ed: F. Nov. 3, 1998; eff. Nov. 23, 1998.
Amend ed: F. June 26, 2000; eff. July 16, 2000.
Amended : F. Oct . 26, 2001; eff. Nov. 15, 2001 .
Amended: F. Oct. 2, 2015; eff. Oct. 22, 2015.
Appendix C
C (Buffalo Creek Affected by Site Specific BLM)
c
Del orme Topo USA® 7.0
Biotic Ligand Model Report for Site-Specific Copper Water Quality Standard, Buffalo Creek, Carroll County, GA •
Figu re 1: Buffa lo Creek Watershed Topography, Drainage Area and EPD Sampling Locations
1· =1.18 m1 Data Zoom 11 -4
Appendix 0 (Ema il from Pete Pattavina Regarding Buffalo C r eek and Listed Bats)
D
Poe, Jason
Hi, Jason. Nice talking to you on the telephone today. I don't see much issue with your not likely to adversely
affect listed bat species with the new designation for Buffalo Creek. I've copied and pasted two abstracts that I
recently saw at the last Southeastern Bat Diversity Network Meeting. Not s ure if these will be helpful at all , but
just wanted to close the loop on what we discussed.
Pete
Pete Pattavina
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
I 05 West Park Dri ve, Suite D
Athens, GA 30606
706-6 13-9493, ext. 236
2
Literature Cited
Best et al. I 997. Diet of Myotis Grisescens. Journal of Mammo logy. 78(2): 569-583.
Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. D. Tuttle, and D. Wilson. 1982. Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish
Wildlife Service 140 pp.
Brady, J., R. L. Clawson, R. K. La Val, T. Kunz, M. D. Tuttle, and D. Wilson. 1983. Recovery
plan for the Indiana Bat. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service, Rockvi lle, Maryland. 94 pp.
Barbour, R. W., and W. H. Davis. 1969. Bats of America. The Un iversity of Kentucky Press,
Lexington, Kentucky.
Caire, W., J. D. Tyler, B. P. Glass, and M . A. Mares. 1989. Mammals of Oklahoma. University
of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Oklahoma. 567 pp.
Center for Biological Diversity. 2010. Petition to list the Eastern Small-footed Bat Myotis leibii
and Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis as threatened or endangered under the
Endangered Species Act. Center for Biological Diversity, P.O. Box 188, Richmond, VT
Clark, D.R., R. K. LaVal, and A. J. Krynitsky. 1980. Dieldrin and heptachlor residue in dead
Gray Bats, Franklin County, Missouri, USA: 1976 vs 1977. Pesticide Monitoring Journal
13:137-
40.
Decher, J., and J. R. Choate. 1995. MYOTIS GRISESCENS. Mammalian Species (510): 1-7.
Fenton, M. B. 1982. Echolocation, insect hearing, and feed ing ecology of insectivorous bats.
Pages 261 -85 in T. H. Kunz (editor). Ecology of Bats. Plenum Press, New York, New York.
Gangloff, M. M. , and Feminella, J. W., in press, Distribution and status of freshwater mussel s
(Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Upper Alabama (Coosa and Lower Tallapoosa) drainage, Alabama:
Auburn University, Alabama, Department of Biological Sciences, 121 p.
Hall, J. S. 1962. A life history and taxonomic study of the Indiana Bat, Myotis sodalis. Reading
Publication Museum Art Ga llery, Science Publicat ion 12. 68 pp.
Hal I. E. R. 1981. The Mammals of North America. 2nd. Ed., 2 Vols. John Wiley and Sons, Nevv
York 1181 pp.
Hamilton. W. J .. Jr. , and J. 0. Whitaker, Jr. 1979. Mammals of the eastern United States. Cornell
Univ. Press, Ithaca. New York. 346 pp.
Harvey. M. J. 1992. Bats of the eastern United Sates. Arkansas Game and l'ish Commission in
cooperation with the U. S. fi sh and Wildlife Service and Tennessee Technological University.
Little Rock, AR.
Harvey. M. J .. J. R. MacGregor. and R.R. Currie. 1991. Distribution and status ofChiroptera in
Kentucky and Tennessee. J. of Tenn. Acad. of Sci. 66( 4): 191-193.
Herkert, J. R.. editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of lll inois: status and distribution.
Vol. 2: Animals. Ill inois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
Jackson, L-l. H. 1961. Mammals of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 504 pp.
Kunz. T. H. 197 1. Reproduction of some vespertilionid bats of central Iowa. Amer. Midi.
Nat.86(2):477-86.
Kunz. T. H. 1973. Resource utiUzation: Temporal and spatial components of bat activity in
central Iowa. Journal of Mammalogy 54( l ): I 4-32
Kurta. A. 1982. A rev iew of Michigan Bats: Seasonal and geographic distribution. Mich. Acad.
14(3 ):295-3 12.
Langw1g. K.. A. Hicks, R. von Linden. C. Herzog, S. Darling, T. French, and J. Armstrong.
2009. White nose syndrome related declines of hibernating bat species in the Northeast.
Presentation at 2009 North American Society for Bat Research symposium. Portland, Oregon.
La Val, R. K., R. L. Clawson, M. L. LaVal and W. Caire. 1977. Foraging !3ehavior and Nocturnal
Activity Patterns of Missouri Bats, with Emphasis on the endangered spec ies Myotis grisescens
and Myotis sodalis. Journal of Mammalogy 58(4):592-599
La Val. R. K., and M. L. La Val. 1980. Ecological studies and management. of Missouri bats. with
emphasis on cave dwelling species. Terrestrial Series 8, Missouri Department or Conservation.
Layne, J. N. , editor. 1978. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. 1. Mammals. State of
Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. xx + 52 pp.
Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to
Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp.
appendix + 6 pp. glossary+ 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes,
Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1 180. Beachan1
Publications, Inc. , Washington, D.C.
Mohr, C. E. 1972. The status of threatened species of cave-dwelling bats. Bull. Nat. Speleol. Soc.
34(2):33-4 7
Mumford, R.E. and J.B. Cope. 1964. Distribution and status of the Chiroptera of Indiana.
American Midland Naturalist 72(2):473-489.
Nagorsen, D. W. and R. M. Brigham. 1993. Bats of British Columbia. Vol. I. The Mammals of
British Columbia. UBC Press, Vancouver, 164 pp.
Richter, A. R., et al. 1993. Modified cave entrances: thermal effect on body mass and resulting
decline of endangered Indiana Bats (MYOTIS SO DALIS). Conservation Biology 7:407
Sparks, D. W. , C. M. Ritzi, J.E. Duchamp, and J. 0. Whitaker, Jr. 2005. Foraging habitat of the
Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) at an urban-rural interface. Journal ofMammalogy 86:713-718.
Thomas, D. W. 1995. Hibernating bats are sensitive to nontactile human disturbance. Journal of
Mammalogy 76:940-946 Organisms and Their Uses. EPA 822-R85-100, Office of Research and
Development, Washington, D.C.
Tuttle, M. D . 1977. Gating as a means of protecting cave dwelling bats. Pages 77-82 in T. A ley
and D. Rhodes, editors. National cave management symposi um proceedings.
Tuttle, M. D., and D. E. Stevenson. 1977. An analysis of migration as a mortality factor in the
Gray Bat based on public recoveries of banded bats. Am. Midi. Nat. 97:235-40.
Tuttle, M. D. 1979. Status, causes of decline, and management of endangered Gray Bats. Journal
of Wildlire Management 43: 1-17.
Tuttle. M. D. 1979. T\;vilight for the Gray Bat. Nat. Parks Conserv. Mag. 53:12-15.
Twente, J. W. 1955. Some aspects of habitat se lection and other behavior of cavern-dwelling
bats. Eco logy 36:706-32.
USEPA. 2007. Aquatic Life Ambient Freshwater Quality Criteria - Copper (EPA-822-R-07-00 1.
February 2007), Office of Water, Washington. D.C.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. Agency draft Indiana Bat (Myotis sodali s) revised
recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildl ife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. 53 pp.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser ice. 29 June 20 11. 90-day finding on a petition to list the Easrem
Small-footed Bat and the orthem Long-eared Bat as threatened or endangered. Federal Register
76(125):38095-381 06.
van Zy ll de Jong, C. G. 1985. Handbook of Canad ian Mamma ls, Volume 2. Bats. National
Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Canada. 2 12 pp.
Whitaker. J. 0. Jr. 1972. food habits of bats from Indiana. Can. J. Zoology. 50:877-83.