100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views2 pages

Senior High School Research Presentation Rubric

This document provides a rubric for evaluating senior high school research presentations with criteria in several areas. It outlines standards in organization, content, quality of conclusion, delivery, use of media, and response to questions. Presentations are scored on a scale of 0-5 for each standard and assigned a weight depending on the standard's importance. The total scores across all standards are calculated to determine the overall presentation grade.

Uploaded by

Aldrin Dela Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views2 pages

Senior High School Research Presentation Rubric

This document provides a rubric for evaluating senior high school research presentations with criteria in several areas. It outlines standards in organization, content, quality of conclusion, delivery, use of media, and response to questions. Presentations are scored on a scale of 0-5 for each standard and assigned a weight depending on the standard's importance. The total scores across all standards are calculated to determine the overall presentation grade.

Uploaded by

Aldrin Dela Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region VIII (Eastern Visayas)
Division of Leyte
LIM-AO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Kananga, Leyte

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL RESEARCH PRESENTATION RUBRIC


(OCTOBER 14, 2019)
RESEARCH TITLE: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

4-5 2-3 0-1 Total


Standards Score Weight
Exemplary Satisfactory Unacceptable Score
Has a clear opening Has opening statement Has no opening
statement that catches relevant to topic and gives statement or has an
audience’s interest; outline of speech; is mostly irrelevant statement;
Organization maintains focus throughout; organized; provides adequate gives listener no focus or X2
summarizes main points “road map” for the listener outline of the
presentation

Demonstrates substance Covers topic; uses appropriate Does not give adequate
and depth; is sources; is objective coverage of topic; lacks
Content comprehensive; shows sources X2
mastery of material

Delivers a conclusion that is Summarizes presentation‘s Has missing or poor


well documented and main points; draws conclusions conclusion; is not tied to
Quality of persuasive based upon these points analysis; does not
X2
Conclusion summarize points that
support the conclusion
Has natural delivery; Has appropriate pace; has no Is often hard to
modulates voice; is distracting mannerisms; is easily
understand; has voice
articulate; projects understood; that is too soft or too loud;
enthusiasm, interest, and has a pace that is
Delivery X1.5
confidence; uses too quick or too slow;
body language effectively demonstrates one or
more distracting
mannerisms
Uses slides effortlessly to Looks at slides to keep on track; Relies heavily on slides
enhance presentation; has uses an appropriate number of and notes; makes little
Use of
an effective presentation slides eye contact; uses slides X1.5
media
without media with too much text

Demonstrates full Shows ease in answering Demonstrates little grasp


knowledge of topic; questions but does not of information; has
Response to
explains and elaborates on elaborate undeveloped or unclear X1
Questions
all questions answers to questions

Grand total: _____________________________

Rater: _______________________________________________

You might also like