Car 145 PDF
Car 145 PDF
AIRWORTHINESS REGULATIONS
Chapter 3
Including
CONTENTS – GENERAL
CAR 145
REGULATIONS
ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF COMPLIANCE
GUIDANCE MATERIAL
FOREWORD
1. The General Civil Aviation Authority known in these regulations as the ―Authority‖
has implemented CAR 145 based on the European Aviation Safety Agency EASA Part
145 with a view to harmonizing legislation.
3. Future development of the requirements of CAR 145 will be in accordance with Notice of
Proposed Amendment (NPA) procedures. These procedures allow for the amendment of
CAR 145 to be harmonized with amendments to EASA and ICAO Annexes in a timely
manner.
4. Reserved.
5. Reserved.
6. New, amended and corrected text will be highlighted by a revision bar against the amended
paragraph.
7. Regulations are presented in Times New Roman font and guidance material is presented in
Arial font.
8. This issue edition is dated ISSUE: JulySeptember, 2011 and the organization is required to
comply with this regulation by 01 January 2012. However existing UAE GCAA approved
CAR 145 organisations may continue to follow the January 2008 edition of CAR 145 until
31 December 2011.
Changes made under ISSUE September 2011:
9. Conformity with the guidance material presented in ―Section AMC‖ of this Chapter is
mandatory unless other means of compliance meet the equivalent level of safety, acceptable
to the GCAA.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Organizations involved in the maintenance of all aircraft registered in UAE in all categories of
operations (except aircraft below 5700 kg Mass take-off Weight Authorized in non commercial
air transport), and components intended for fitment thereto, shall be approved in accordance
with CAR145.
Unless maintained by CAR145 organization, non commercial air transport category aircraft
below 5700 kg MTOA shall comply with the requirement stipulated in CAR M Sub Part F.
The approved maintenance organization shall establish procedures acceptable to the authority to
comply with the requirements of CAR Part V Chapter 2 Section 9 for performing Duplicate
Inspections
This Section establishes the requirements to be met by an organization to qualify for the issue or
continuation of an approval for the maintenance of aircraft and components.
1. Line Maintenance should be understood as any maintenance that is carried out before flight
to ensure that the aircraft is fit for the intended flight.
Trouble shooting.
Defect rectification.
Component replacement with use of external test equipment, if required.
Component replacement may include components such as engines and
propellers.
Scheduled maintenance and/or checks including visual inspections that will
detect obvious unsatisfactory conditions/discrepancies but do not require
extensive in depth inspection. It may also include internal structure, systems and
powerplant items which are visible through quick opening access panels/doors.
Minor repairs and modifications which do not require extensive disassembly
and can be accomplished by simple means.
(b) For temporary or occasional cases (AD's, SB's) the Quality Manager may accept
base maintenance tasks to be performed by a line maintenance organization
provided all requirements are fulfilled as defined by the Authority.
(c) Maintenance tasks falling outside these criteria are considered to be Base
Maintenance.
2. For an organization based in the UAE and to be approved in accordance with 145.10 means
that the management as specified in 145.30 (a) and (b) should be located in the UAE.
3. Where the organization uses facilities both inside and outside the UAE such as satellite
facilities, sub-contractors, and line stations etc., such facilities may be included in the
approval without being identified on the approval certificate subject to the maintenance
organization exposition identifying the facilities and containing procedures to control such
facilities and the Authority being satisfied that they form an integral part of the approved
maintenance organization.
GM 145.10 Scope
This Guidance Material (GM) provides guidance on how the smallest organizations satisfy the
intent of CAR145:
2. It is recognized that a CAR145 approval may be required by two quite different types of
small organizations, the first being the light aircraft maintenance hangar, the second being
the component maintenance workshop, e.g. small piston engines, radio equipment, etc.
3. Where only one person is employed (in fact having the certifying function and others), these
organizations approved under CAR145 may use the alternatives provided in point 3.1 limited
to the following:
Class A2 Base and Line maintenance of aeroplanes of 5700 kg and below (piston engines
only).
Class A3 Base and Line maintenance of single-engined helicopters of less than 3175 kg.
Class A4 Aircraft other than A1, A2 and A3.
Class B2 Piston engines with maximum output of less than 450 HP.
Class C Components.
Class D1 Non destructive Testing.
Issue: July 2011 Page 8 of 100
CAR 145
3.1 145.30 (b): The minimum requirement is for one full-time person who meets the CAR66
requirements for certifying staff and holds the position of ‗accountable manager,
maintenance engineer and is also certifying staff‘. No other person may issue a certificate
of release to service and, therefore, if absent, no maintenance may be released during
such absence.
Note: Full-time for the purpose of CAR145 means not less than 35 hrs per week except
during vacation periods.
3.1.2 145.35. In the case of an approval based on one person using a subcontracted
quality monitoring arrangement, the requirement for a record of certifying staff
is satisfied by the submission to and acceptance by the authority of the GTF-
NPA-001 Form. With only one person the requirement for a separate record of
authorization is unnecessary because the AWF-AMO-007 approval schedule
defines the authorization. An appropriate statement, to reflect this situation,
should be included in the exposition.
4.1. 145.30 (b): The normal minimum requirement is for the employment on a fulltime basis
of two persons who meet the authorities‘ requirements for certifying staff, whereby one
holds the position of ‗maintenance engineer‘ and the other holds the position of ‗quality
audit engineer‘.
Either person can assume the responsibilities of the accountable manager providing that
they can comply in full with the applicable elements of 145.30(a), but the ‗maintenance
engineer‘ should be the certifying person to retain the independence of the ‗quality audit
engineer‘ to carry out audits. Nothing prevents either engineer from undertaking
maintenance tasks providing that the ‗maintenance engineer‘ issues the certificate of
release to service.
The ‗quality audit engineer‘ should have similar qualifications and status to the
‗maintenance engineer‘ for reasons of credibility, unless he/she has a proven track-record
in aircraft quality assurance, in which case some reduction in the extent of maintenance
qualifications may be permitted.
In cases where the competent authority agrees that it is not practical for the organization
to nominate a post holder for the quality monitoring function, this function may be
contracted in accordance to paragraph 3.1.1.
An application for the issue, renewal or variation of an approval shall be made to the
Authority in a form and manner established by the Authority.
In a form and in a manner established by the Authority means that the application should be
made on the appropriate GCAA application form available on the GCAA website.
The organization shall specify the scope of work deemed to constitute approval in its
exposition (Appendix ii to this Regulation contains a table of all classes and ratings)
The following table identifies the ATA specification 100 chapter for the category C
component rating.
(a) Facilities are provided appropriate for all planned work, ensuring in particular, protection
from the weather elements. Specialized workshops and bays are segregated, as appropriate,
to ensure that environmental and work area contamination is unlikely to occur.
1. For base maintenance of aircraft, aircraft hangars are both available and large enough to
accommodate aircraft on planned base maintenance;
(b) Office accommodation is provided for the management of the planned work referred to in
paragraph (a), and certifying staff so that they can carry out their designated tasks in a
manner that contributes to good aircraft maintenance standards.
(c) The working environment including aircraft hangars, component workshops and office
accommodation is appropriate for the task carried out and in particular special requirements
observed. Unless otherwise dictated by the particular task environment, the working
1. temperatures must be maintained such that personnel can carry out required tasks without
undue discomfort.
2. dust and any other airborne contamination are kept to a minimum and not be permitted to
reach a level in the work task area where visible aircraft/component surface
contamination is evident. Where dust/other airborne contamination results in visible
surface contamination, all susceptible systems are sealed until acceptable conditions are
re-established.
3. lighting is such as to ensure each inspection and maintenance task can be carried out in an
effective manner.
4. noise shall not distract personnel from carrying out inspection tasks. Where it is
impractical to control the noise source, such personnel are provided with the necessary
personal equipment to stop excessive noise causing distraction during inspection tasks.
6. the working environment for line maintenance is such that the particular maintenance or
inspection task can be carried out without undue distraction. Therefore where the
working environment deteriorates to an unacceptable level in respect of temperature,
moisture, hail, ice, snow, wind, light, dust/other airborne contamination, the particular
maintenance or inspection tasks must be suspended until satisfactory conditions are re-
established.
(d) Secure storage facilities are provided for components, equipment, tools and material. Storage
conditions ensure segregation of serviceable components and material from unserviceable
aircraft components, material, equipment and tools. The conditions of storage are in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions to prevent deterioration and damage of
stored items. Access to storage facilities is restricted to authorized personnel.
1. Where the hangar is not owned by the organization, it may be necessary to establish proof of
tenancy. In addition, sufficiency of hangar space to carry out planned base maintenance
should be demonstrated by the preparation of a projected aircraft hangar visit plan relative
to the maintenance programme. The aircraft hangar visit plan should be updated on a
regular basis.
2. Protection from the weather elements relates to the normal prevailing local weather
elements that are expected throughout any twelve month period. Aircraft hangar and
component workshop structures should prevent the ingress of rain, hail, ice, snow, wind and
dust etc. Aircraft hangar and component workshop floors should be sealed to minimize dust
generation.
Issue: July 2011 Page 12 of 100
CAR 145
3. For line maintenance of aircraft, hangars are not essential but it is recommended that access
to hangar accommodation be demonstrated for usage during inclement weather for minor
scheduled work and lengthy defect rectification.
4. Aircraft maintenance staff should be provided with an area where they may study
maintenance instructions and complete maintenance records in a proper manner.
It is acceptable to combine any or all of the office accommodation requirements into one
office subject to the staff having sufficient room to carry out assigned tasks.
In addition, as part of the office accommodation, aircraft maintenance staff should be provided
with an area where they may study maintenance instructions and complete maintenance records
in a proper manner.
Storage facilities for serviceable aircraft components should be clean, well ventilated and
maintained at a constant dry temperature to minimize the effects of condensation.
Manufacturer‘s storage recommendations should be followed for those aircraft components
identified in such published recommendations.
1. Storage racks should be strong enough to hold aircraft components and provide sufficient
support for large aircraft components such that the component is not distorted during
storage.
(a) The organization shall appoint an accountable manager who has corporate Authority
for ensuring that all maintenance required by the customer can be financed and carried out
to the standard required by this Part. The accountable manager shall:
2. establish and promote the safety and quality policy specified in CAR 145.65(a).
(b) The organization shall nominate a person or group of persons, whose responsibilities include
ensuring that the organization complies with this Part. Such person(s) shall ultimately be
responsible to the accountable manager.
1. The person or persons nominated shall represent the maintenance management structure
of the organization and be responsible for all functions specified in this Part.
2. The person or persons nominated shall be identified and their credentials submitted in a
form and manner established by the Authority.
4. Procedures shall make clear who deputizes for any particular person in the case of
lengthy absence of the said person.
(c) The accountable manager under paragraph (a) shall appoint a person with responsibility for
monitoring the quality system, including the associated feedback system as required by CAR
145.65(c). The appointed person shall have direct access to the accountable manager to
ensure that the accountable manager is kept properly informed on quality and compliance
matters.
(d) The organization shall have a maintenance man-hour plan showing that the organization has
sufficient staff to plan, perform, supervise, inspect and quality monitor the organization in
accordance with the approval. In addition the organization shall have a procedure to reassess
work intended to be carried out when actual staff availability is less than the planned staffing
level for any particular work shift or period.
(e) The organization shall establish and control the competence of personnel involved in any
maintenance, management and/or quality audits in accordance with a procedure and to a
standard agreed by the Authority. In addition to the necessary expertise related to the job
function, competence must include an understanding of the application of human factors and
human performance issues appropriate to that person's function in the organization. ‗Human
factors‘ means principles which apply to aeronautical design, certification, training,
operations and maintenance and which seek safe interface between the human and other
system components by proper consideration of human performance. ‗Human performance‘
means human capabilities and limitations which have an impact on the safety and efficiency
of aeronautical operations.
(f) The organization shall ensure that personnel who carry out and/or control a continued
airworthiness non-destructive test of aircraft structures and/or components are
appropriately qualified for the particular non-destructive test in accordance with the
European or equivalent Standard recognized by the Authority. Personnel who carry out
any other specialized task shall be appropriately qualified in accordance with officially
recognized Standards. By derogation to this paragraph those personnel specified in
paragraphs (g) and (h)(1) and (h)(2), qualified in CAR 66 category B1 may carry out
and/or control color contrast dye penetrant tests.
(g) Any organization maintaining aircraft, except where stated otherwise in paragraph (j), shall
in the case of aircraft line maintenance, have appropriate aircraft type rated certifying
staff qualified as category B1 and B2 in accordance with CAR 66 and CAR 145.35. In
addition such organizations may also use appropriately task trained certifying staff
qualified as category A in accordance with CAR 66 and CAR 145.35 to carry out minor
scheduled line maintenance and simple defect rectification. The availability of such
category A certifying staff shall not replace the need for CAR 66 category B1 and B2
certifying staff to support the category A certifying staff. However, such CAR 66 category
B1 and B2 staff need not always be present at the line station during minor scheduled
line maintenance or simple defect rectification.
(h) Any organization maintaining aircraft, except where stated otherwise in paragraph (j) shall:
1. in the case of base maintenance of large aircraft, have appropriate aircraft type rated
certifying staff qualified as category C in accordance with CAR 66 and CAR 145.35.
In addition the organization shall have sufficient aircraft type rated staff qualified
as category B1 and B2 in accordance with CAR 66 and CAR 145.35 to support
the category C certifying staff:
i. B1 and B2 support staff shall ensure that all relevant tasks or inspections
have been carried out to the required standard before the category C
certifying staff issues the certificate of release to service.
ii. The organization shall maintain a register of any such B1 and B2 support
staff.
iii. The category C certifying staff shall ensure that compliance with paragraph
(i) has been met and that all work required by the customer has been
accomplished during the particular base maintenance check or work
package, and shall also assess the impact of any work not carried out with a
view to either requiring its accomplishment or agreeing with the operator to
defer such work to another specified check or time limit.
2. in the case of base maintenance of aircraft other than large aircraft have either:
(j) By derogation to paragraphs (g) and (h), the organization may use certifying staff qualified
in accordance with the following provisions:
1. For organization facilities located outside the UAE territory, certifying staff may be
qualified in accordance with their national aviation regulation of the state in which the
organization facility is registered subject to the conditions specified in Appendix IV to
this Regulation.
2. Reserve
3. For a repetitive pre-flight airworthiness directive which specifically states that the flight
crew may carry out such airworthiness directive, the organization may issue a limited
certification authorization to the aircraft commander and/or the flight engineer on the
basis of the flight crew license held. However, the organization shall ensure that
sufficient practical training has been carried out to ensure that such aircraft commander
or flight engineer can accomplish the airworthiness directive to the required standard.
4. In the case of aircraft operating away from a supported location the organization may
issue a limited certification authorization to the commander and/or the flight engineer
on the basis of the flight crew license held subject to being satisfied that sufficient
practical training has been carried out to ensure that the commander or flight engineer
can accomplish the specified task to the required standard. The provisions of this
paragraph shall be detailed in an exposition procedure.
5. In the following unforeseen cases, where an aircraft is grounded at a location other than
the main base where no appropriate certifying staff are available, the organization
contracted to provide maintenance support may issue a one-off certification
authorization;
ii. to any person with not less than five years maintenance experience and
holding a valid ICAO aircraft maintenance license rated for the aircraft
type requiring certification provided there is no organization appropriately
approved under this Part at that location and the contracted organization
obtains and holds on file evidence of the experience and the license of that
person.
All such cases as specified in this subparagraph shall be reported to the Authority within seven
days of the issuance of such certification authorization. The organization issuing the one-off
authorization shall ensure that any such maintenance that could affect flight safety is re-checked
by an appropriately approved organization
With regard to the accountable manager, it is normally intended to mean the chief executive
officer of the approved maintenance organization, who by virtue of position has overall
(including in particular financial) responsibility for running the organization. The accountable
manager may be the accountable manager for more than one organization and is not required
to be necessarily knowledgeable on technical matters as the maintenance organization
Issue: July 2011 Page 16 of 100
CAR 145
exposition defines the maintenance standards. When the accountable manager is not the
chief executive officer the Authority will need to be assured that such an accountable manager
has direct access to chief executive officer and has a sufficiency of ‗maintenance funding‘
allocation.
1. Dependent upon the size of the organization, the CAR 145 functions may be subdivided
under individual managers or combined in any number of ways.
2. The organization should have, dependent upon the extent of approval, a base maintenance
manager, a line maintenance manager, a workshop manager and a quality manager, all of
whom should report to the accountable manager except in small CAR 145 organization
where anyone manager may also be the accountable manager, as determined by the
Authority, he/she may also be the line maintenance manager or the workshop manager.
3. The base maintenance manager is responsible for ensuring that all maintenance required to
be carried out in the hangar, plus any defect rectification carried out during base
maintenance, is carried out to the design and quality standards specified in CAR
145.65(c). The base maintenance manager is also responsible for any corrective action
resulting from the quality compliance monitoring of CAR 145.65(d).
4. The line maintenance manager is responsible for ensuring that all maintenance required to be
carried out on the line including line defect rectification is carried out to the standards
specified in CAR 145.65(b) and also responsible for any corrective action resulting from the
quality compliance monitoring of CAR 145.65(c).
5. The workshop manager is responsible for ensuring that all work on aircraft components is
carried out to the standards specified in CAR 145.65(b) and also responsible for any
corrective action resulting from the quality compliance monitoring of CAR 145.65(c).
7. Notwithstanding the example sub-paragraphs 2 - 6 titles, the organization may adopt any title
for the foregoing managerial positions but should identify to the Authority the titles and
persons chosen to carry out these functions.
8. Where an organization chooses to appoint managers for all or any combination of the
identified CAR 145 functions because of the size of the undertaking, it is necessary that these
managers report ultimately through either the base maintenance manager or line maintenance
manager or workshop manager or quality manager, as appropriate, to the accountable
manager.
NOTE: Certifying staff may report to any of the managers specified depending upon which
type of control the approved maintenance organization uses (for example licensed
engineers/independent inspection/dual function supervisors etc.) so long a the quality
compliance monitoring staff specified in CAR145.65(c)(1) remain independent.
Monitoring the quality system includes requesting remedial action as necessary by the
accountable manager and the nominated persons referred to in CAR 145.30(b).
Has sufficient staff means that the organization employs or contracts such staff of which at least
half the staff that perform maintenance in each workshop, hangar or flight line on any shift
should be employed to ensure organizational stability. Contract staff, being part time or full time
should be made aware that when working for the organization they are subjected to compliance
with the organization‘s procedures specified in the maintenance organization exposition relevant
to their duties. For the purpose of this sub-paragraph, employed means the person is directly
employed as an individual by the maintenance organization approved under CAR 145 whereas
contracted means the person is employed by another organization and contracted by that
organization to the maintenance organization approved under CAR 145.
The maintenance man-hour plan should take into account any maintenance carried out on aircraft
/aircraft components from outside the State and should also take into account all work carried out
outside the scope of the CAR 145 approval.
The maintenance man-hour plan should relate to the anticipated maintenance work load except
that when the organization cannot predict such workload, due to the short term nature of its
contracts, then such plan should be based upon the minimum maintenance workload needed for
commercial viability. Maintenance work load includes all necessary work such as, but not
limited to, planning, maintenance record checks, production of worksheets/cards in paper or
electronic form, accomplishment of maintenance, inspection and the completion of maintenance
records.
In the case of aircraft base maintenance, the maintenance man-hour plan should relate to the
aircraft hangar visit plan as specified in AMC 145.25(a).
In the case of aircraft component maintenance, the maintenance man-hour plan should relate to
the aircraft component planned maintenance as specified in CAR 145.25(a) (2).
The quality monitoring compliance function man-hours should be sufficient to meet the
requirement of CAR 145.65(c) which means taking into account AMC145.65(c). Where quality
monitoring staff perform other functions the time, allocated to such functions, needs to be taken
into account in determining quality monitoring staff numbers.
The maintenance man-hour plan should be reviewed at least every 3 months and updated when
necessary.
Significant deviation from the maintenance man-hour plan should be reported through the
departmental manager to the quality manager and the accountable manager for review.
Significant deviation means more than a 25% shortfall in available man-hours during a calendar
month for any one of the functions specified in CAR 145.30(d).
1. The referenced procedure requires amongst others that planners, mechanics, specialized
services staff, supervisors and certifying staff are assessed for competence by 'on the job'
evaluation and/or by examination relevant to their particular job role within the organization
before unsupervised work is permitted. A record of the qualification and competence
assessment should be kept.
2. Adequate initial and recurrent training should be provided and recorded to ensure continued
competence.
3. To assist in the assessment of competence, job descriptions are recommended for each job
role in the organization. Basically, the assessment should establish that:
(a) Planners are able to interpret maintenance requirements into maintenance tasks, and
have an appreciation that they have no authority to deviate from the maintenance data.
(b) Mechanics are able to carry out maintenance tasks to any standard specified in the
maintenance data and will notify supervisors of mistakes requiring rectification to re-
establish required maintenance standards.
(c) Specialized services staff are able to carry out specialized maintenance tasks to the
standard specified in the maintenance data and will both inform and await instructions
from their supervisor in any case where it is not possible to complete the specialized
maintenance in accordance with the maintenance data.
(d) Supervisors are able to ensure that all required maintenance tasks are carried out and
where not completed or where it is evident that a particular maintenance task cannot
be carried out to the maintenance data, then such problems will be reported to the
CAR145.30(c) person for appropriate action. In addition, for those supervisors who
also carry out maintenance tasks that they understand such tasks should not be
undertaken when incompatible with their management responsibilities.
(e) Certifying staff are able to determine when the aircraft or aircraft component is ready
to release to service and when it should not be released to service.
4. In the case of planners, specialized services staff, supervisors and certifying staff
acknowledge of organization procedures relevant to their particular role in the organization is
important. The aforementioned list is not exclusive and may include other categories of
personnel.
5. Quality audit staff are able to monitor compliance with CAR 145 identifying non compliance
in an effective and timely manner so that the organization may remain in compliance with
CAR 145.
6. In respect to the understanding of the application of human factors and human performance
issues, maintenance, management, and quality audit personnel should be assessed for the
need to receive Initial human factors training, but in any case all maintenance, management,
and quality audit personnel should receive human factors continuation training. This should
Issue: July 2011 Page 19 of 100
CAR 145
concern to a minimum:
7. Initial human factors training should cover all the topics of the training syllabus specified in
GM 145.30(e) either as a dedicated course or else integrated within other training. The
syllabus may be adjusted to reflect the particular nature of the organization. The syllabus
may also be adjusted to meet the particular nature of work for each function within the
organization. For example:
- small organizations not working in shifts may cover in less depth subjects related to
teamwork and communication,
- planners may cover in more depth the scheduling and planning objective of the
syllabus and in less depth the objective of developing skills for shift working.
Depending on the result of the evaluation as specified in paragraph 6, initial training should
be provided to personnel within 6 months of joining the maintenance organization, but
temporary staff may need be trained shortly after joining the organization to cope with the
duration of employment.
Personnel being recruited from another maintenance organization approved under CAR
145 and temporary staff should be assessed for the need to receive any additional Human
factors training to meet the new maintenance organization‘s approved under CAR 145
human factors training standard.
8. The purpose of human factors continuation training is primarily to ensure that staff remain
current in terms of human factors and also to collect feedback on human factors issues.
Consideration should be given to the possibility that such training has the involvement of the
quality department. There should be a procedure to ensure that feedback is formally passed
from the trainers to the quality department to initiate action where necessary.
Human factors continuation training should be of an appropriate duration in each two year
period in relation to relevant quality audit findings and other internal/external sources of
information available to the organization on human errors in maintenance.
10. The Human factors training procedures should be specified in the maintenance organization
exposition.
11. Additional training in fuel tank safety as well as associated inspection standards and
maintenance procedures should be required for maintenance organizations‘ technical
personnel, especially technical personnel involved in the compliance of CDCCL tasks.
1. Continued airworthiness non-destructive testing means such testing specified by the type
certificate holder/aircraft or engine or propeller manufacturer in accordance with the
maintenance data as specified in CAR 145.45 for in service aircraft/aircraft components for
the purpose of determining the continued fitness of the product to operate safely.
3. Notwithstanding the fact that Level 3 personnel may be qualified via EN 4179, MIL-STD-
410E, ATA Specification 105, to establish and authorize methods, techniques, etc., this
does not permit such personnel to deviate from methods and techniques published by the
type certificate holder/manufacturer in the form of continued airworthiness data, such as in
non-destructive test manuals or service bulletins, unless the manual or service bulletin
expressly permits such deviation.
5. Particular non-destructive test means any one or more of the following; Dye reentrant,
magnetic particle, eddy current, ultrasonic and radiographic methods including X ray and
gamma ray.
6. It should be noted that new methods are and will be developed, such as, but not limited to
thermography and shearography, Until such time as an agreed standard is established such
methods should be carried out in accordance with the particular equipment manufacturers‘
recommendations including any training and examination process to ensure competence of
the personnel in the process.
7. Any maintenance organization approved under CAR 145 that carries out NDT should
establish NDT specialist qualification procedures detailed in the exposition and accepted
by the Authority.
8. Boroscoping and other techniques such as de-lamination coin tapping are non-destructive
inspections rather than non-destructive testing. Notwithstanding such differentiation, the
maintenance organization should establish an exposition procedure accepted by the
Authority to ensure that personnel who carry out and interpret such inspections are
properly trained and assessed for their competence in the process. Non-destructive
inspections, not being considered as NDT by CAR 145 are not listed in Appendix 2 under
class rating D1.
9. The referenced standards, methods, training and procedures should be specified in the
maintenance organization exposition.
10. Any such personnel who intend to carry out and/or control a non-destructive test for which
they were not qualified prior to the effective date of CAR 145 should qualify for such non-
destructive test in accordance with EN 4179. MIL-STD-410E, ATA Specification 105, or
any other equivalent standard acceptable to the Authority.
11. In this context officially recognized standard means those standards established or published
by an official body whether having legal personality or not, which are widely recognized by
the air transport sector as constituting good practice.
1. For the purposes of category A minor scheduled line maintenance means any minor
scheduled inspection/check up to and including a weekly check specified in the operators
approved aircraft maintenance programme. For aircraft maintenance programmes that do
not specify a weekly check, the Authority will determine the most significant check that is
considered equivalent to a weekly check.
2. Typical tasks permitted after appropriate task training to be carried out by the category A
for the purpose of the category A issuing an aircraft certificate of release to service as
specified in CAR 145.50 as part of minor scheduled line maintenance or simple defect
rectification are contained in the following list:
NOTE: This list will be periodically updated in the light of ongoing experience and
technological changes.
The category B1 and B2 support staff need not hold a certifying authorization in accordance
with CAR 145.35 (b) but the organization may use such appropriately authorized certifying
staff to satisfy the requirement.
1. For the issue of a limited certification authorization the commander or flight engineer
should hold either a valid air transport pilots license (ATPL), commercial pilot license
(CPL) or flight engineer (F/EL) license in accordance with CAR-FCL, on the aircraft type.
In addition the limited certification authorization is subject to the maintenance organization
exposition containing procedures to address the personnel requirements of CAR 145.30 (e)
and associated AMC and guidance material.
2. (i) Typical tasks that may be certified and/or carried out by the commander holding an ATPL
or CPL are minor maintenance or simple checks included in the following list:
2. (ii) Holders of a valid CAR FCL Flight engineer license, on the aircraft type may only
exercise this limited certification authorization privilege when performing the duties of a flight
engineer.
In addition to paragraph 2(i)(a) to (e) other typical minor maintenance or simple defect
rectification tasks that may be carried out are included in the following list:
3. The authorization should have a finite life of twelve months subject to satisfactory re-current
training on the applicable aircraft type.
1. For the purposes of this sub-paragraph ―unforeseen‖ means that the aircraft grounding
could not reasonably have been predicted by the operator because the defect was
unexpected due to being part of a hitherto reliable system.
2. A one-off authorization should only be considered for issue by the quality department of
the contracted organization after it has made a reasoned judgment that such a requirement
is appropriate under the circumstances and at the same time maintaining the required
airworthiness standards. The organization‘s quality department will need to assess each
situation individually prior to the issuance of a one-off authorization.
3. A one-off authorization should not be issued where the level of certification required could
Issue: July 2011 Page 24 of 100
CAR 145
exceed the knowledge and experience level of the person it is issued to. In all cases, due
consideration should be given to the complexity of the work involved and the availability
of required tooling and/or test equipment needed to complete the work.
In those situations where the requirement for a one off authorization to issue a CRS for a task
on an aircraft type for which certifying staff does not hold a type-rated authorization has been
identified, the following procedure is recommended:
1. Flight crew should communicate full details of the defect to the operator‘s supporting
maintenance organization. If necessary the supporting maintenance organization will then
request the use of a one off authorization from the quality department.
2. When issuing a one off authorization, the quality department of the organization
should verify that:
(a) Full technical details relating to the work required to be carried out have been
established and passed to the certifying staff.
(b) The organization has an approved procedure in place for coordinating and
controlling the total maintenance activity undertaken at the location under the
Authority of the one off authorization.
(c) The person to whom a one-off Authorization is issued has been provided all the
necessary information and guidance relating to maintenance data and any
special technical instructions associated with the specific task undertaken. A
detailed step by step worksheet has been defined by the organization,
communicated to the one off authorization holder.
(d) The person holds authorizations of equivalent level and scope on other aircraft
type of similar technology, construction and systems.
3. The one off authorization holder should sign off the detailed step by step worksheet when
completing the work steps. The completed tasks should be verified by visual examination
and/or normal system operation upon return to an appropriately approved CAR 145
maintenance facility.
This paragraph addresses staff not employed by the maintenance organization who meet the
requirements of CAR 145.30(j) (5). In addition to the items listed in AMC 145.30(j) (5)
(i), paragraph 1, 2(a), (b) and (c) and 3 the quality department of the organization may issue
such one off authorization providing full qualification details relating to the proposed certifying
personnel are verified by the quality department and made available at the location.
The training syllabus below identifies the topics and subtopics to be addressed during the
human factors training.
The maintenance organization may combine, divide, change the order of any subject of the
syllabus to suit its own needs, so long as all subjects are covered to a level of detail appropriate
to the organization and its personnel.
Some of the topics may be covered in separate training (health and safety, management,
supervisory skills, etc.) in which case duplication of training is not necessary.
Where possible, practical illustrations and examples should be used, especially accident and
incident reports.
Topics should be related to existing legislation, where relevant. Topics should be related to
existing guidance/advisory material, where relevant (e.g. ICAO HF Digests and Training
Manual).
Topics should be related to maintenance engineering where possible; too much unrelated
theory should be avoided.
3. Human Error
4.1. Vision
4.2. Hearing
4.3. Information-processing
4.4. Attention and perception
4.5. Situational awareness
4.6. Memory
4.7. Claustrophobia and physical access
4.8. Motivation
4.9. Fitness/Health
4.10. Stress
Issue: July 2011 Page 26 of 100
CAR 145
5. Environment
7. Communication
8. Teamwork
8.1. Responsibility
8.2. Management, supervision and leadership
8.3. Decision making
- Air law
- Airframe/systems/power plant
- Instruments/electronics
- Mass and balance
- Performance
- Flight planning and monitoring
- Human performance and limitations
- Meteorology
- General navigation
- Radio Navigation
- Operational Procedures
- Principles of Flight
- VFR Communications
- IFR Communications
2. For the holder of a CAR FCL F/EL, CAR FCL 4 subpart D gives details on the theoretical
and practical knowledge and skill requirements from which appendix 1 to CAR FCL
4.160 Technical Training Course (TTC) must include details of the following subjects:
(See CAR- FCL 4.160(b)(1))
The theoretical knowledge instruction consists of 100 hours and includes the
following elements:
Practical skills training provided by an organization approved under CAR 145 is given
which includes 35 hours practical experience in the following subjects:
Following successful completion of the technical training, the training organization carrying
out the theoretical knowledge instruction and/or the practical skill training, should provide
the applicant with a certificate of satisfactory completion of the course, or part thereof.
(a) In addition to the appropriate requirements of CAR 145.30(g) and (h), the organization
shall ensure that certifying staff and category B1 and B2 support staff have an
adequate understanding of the relevant aircraft and/or components to be maintained
together with the associated organization procedures. In the case of certifying staff, this
must be accomplished before the issue or re-issue of the certification authorization.
‗Category B1 and B2 support staff‘ means those category B1 and B2 staff in the base
maintenance environment who do not hold necessarily certification privileges. ‗Relevant
aircraft and/or components‘ mean those aircraft or components specified in the particular
certification authorization. ‗Certification authorization‘ means the authorization issued to
certifying staff by the organization and which specifies the fact that they may sign
certificates of release to service within the limitations stated in such authorization on
behalf of the approved organization.
(b) Excepting those cases listed in CAR 145.30(j) the organization may only issue a certification
authorization to certifying staff in relation to the basic categories or subcategories and any
type rating listed on the aircraft maintenance license as required by CAR 66, subject to the
license remaining valid throughout the validity period of the authorization and the certifying
staff remaining in compliance with CAR 66.
(c) The organization shall ensure that all certifying staff and category B1 and B2 support staff
are involved in at least six months of actual relevant aircraft or component maintenance
experience in any consecutive two year period. For the purpose of this paragraph ‗involved
in actual relevant aircraft or component maintenance‘ means that the person has worked in
an aircraft or component maintenance environment and has either exercised the privileges of
the certification authorization and/or has actually carried out maintenance on at least some
of the aircraft type systems specified in the particular certification authorization.
(d) The organization shall ensure that all certifying staff and category B1 and B2 support
staff receive sufficient continuation training in each two year period to ensure that such
staff have up-to-date knowledge of relevant technology, organization procedures and human
factor issues.
(e) The organization shall establish a programme for continuation training for certifying staff
and category B1 and B2 support staff, including a procedure to ensure compliance with
the relevant paragraphs of CAR 145.35 as the basis for issuing certification authorizations
under this Part to certifying staff, and a procedure to ensure compliance with CAR 66.
(f) Except where any of the unforeseen cases of CAR 145.30(j)(5) apply, the organization
shall assess all prospective certifying staff for their competence, qualification and
capability to carry out their intended certifying duties in accordance with a procedure as
specified in the exposition prior to the issue or re-issue of a certification authorization under
this Part.
(g) When the conditions of paragraphs (a), (b), (d), (f) and, where applicable, paragraph (c)
have been fulfilled by the certifying staff, the organization shall issue a certification
authorization that clearly specifies the scope and limits of such authorization. Continued
validity of the certification authorization is dependent upon continued compliance with
paragraphs (a), (b), (d), and where applicable, paragraph (c).
(h) The certification authorization must be in a style that makes its scope clear to the
certifying staff and any authorized person who may require examining the authorization.
Where codes are used to define scope, the organization shall make a code translation
readily available.
‗Authorized person‘ means the officials of the Authority who has responsibility for the
oversight of the maintained aircraft or component.
(i) The person responsible for the quality system shall also remain responsible on behalf of the
organization for issuing certification authorizations to certifying staff. Such person may
nominate other persons to actually issue or revoke the certification authorizations in
accordance with a procedure as specified in the exposition.
(j) The organization shall maintain a record of all certifying staff and category B1 and B2
support staff.
1) the details of any aircraft maintenance license held under CAR 66; and
2) all relevant training completed; and
3) the scope of the certification authorizations issued, where relevant, and
4) particulars of staff with limited or one-off certification authorizations.
The organization shall retain the record for at least three years after the staff
referred in this paragraph have ceased employment with the organization or as soon
as the authorization has been withdrawn. In addition, upon request, the
maintenance organization shall furnish staff referred to in this paragraph with a
copy of their personal record on leaving the organization.
The staff referred to in this paragraph shall be given access on request to their
personal records as detailed above.
(k) The organization shall provide certifying staff with a copy of their certification authorization
in either a documented or electronic format.
Issue: July 2011 Page 30 of 100
CAR 145
(l) Certifying staff shall produce their certification authorization to any authorized person
within 24 hours.
(m) The minimum age for certifying staff and category B1 and B2 support staff is 21 years.
2. The organization should hold copies of all documents that attest to qualification, and to
recent experience.
The organization issues the certification authorization when satisfied that compliance has been
established with the appropriate paragraphs of CAR 145 and CAR 66. In granting the
certification authorization the maintenance organization approved under CAR 145 needs to be
satisfied that the person holds a valid aircraft maintenance license and may need to confirm
such fact with the Authority.
1. Continuation training is a two way process to ensure that certifying staff remain current in
terms of procedures, human factors and technical knowledge and that the organization
receives feedback on the adequacy of its procedures and maintenance instructions. Due to
the interactive nature of this training, consideration should be given to the possibility that
such training has the involvement of the quality department to ensure that feedback is
actioned. Alternatively, there should be a procedure to ensure that feedback is formally
passed from the training department to the quality department to initiate action.
2. Continuation training should cover changes in relevant requirements such as CAR 145,
changes in organization procedures and the modification standard of the products being
maintained plus human factor issues identified from any internal or external analysis of
incidents. It should also address instances where staff failed to follow procedures and the
reasons why particular procedures are not always followed. In many cases the continuation
training will reinforce the need to follow procedures and ensure that incomplete or incorrect
procedures are identified to the company in order that they can be corrected. This does not
preclude the possible need to carry out a quality audit of such procedures.
3. Continuation training should be of sufficient duration in each 2 year period to meet the intent
of CAR 145.35(d) and may be split into a number of separate elements. CAR 145.35(d)
Issue: July 2011 Page 31 of 100
CAR 145
The programme for continuation training should list all certifying staff and support staff and
when training will take place, the elements of such training and an indication that it was carried
out reasonably on time as planned. Such information should subsequently be transferred to the
certifying staff and support staff record as required by 145.35 (j).
1. As stated in 145.35 (f), with one exception, all prospective certifying staff are required to be
assessed for competence, qualification and capability related to intended certifying duties.
There are a number of ways in which such assessment may be carried out but the following
points need to be considered to establish an assessment procedure that fits the particular
organization.
2. Competence and capability can be assessed by working the person under the supervision of
either another certifying person or a quality auditor for sufficient time to arrive at a
conclusion. Sufficient time could be as little as a few weeks if the person is fully exposed to
relevant work. It is not required to assess against the complete spectrum of intended duties.
When the person has been recruited from another approved maintenance organization and
was a certifying person in that organization than the organization should accept a written
confirmation from the person responsible for running the quality system about the person.
3. Qualification assessment means collecting copies of all documents that attest to qualification,
such as the license and/or any authorization held. This should be followed by a confirmation
check with the organization(s) that issued such document(s) and finally a comparison check
for differences between the product type ratings on the qualification documents and the
relevant product types maintained by the organization. This latter point may reveal a need for
product type differences training
(a) Name
(b) Date of Birth
(c) Basic Training
(d) Type Training
(e) Continuation Training
(f) Experience
(g) Qualifications relevant to the authorization
(h) Scope of the authorization
(i) Date of first issue of the authorization
(j) If appropriate - expiry date of the authorization
(k) Identification Number of the authorization
2. The record may be kept in any format but should be controlled by the organization‘s quality
department. This does not mean that the quality department should run the record system.
3. Persons authorized to access the system should be maintained at a minimum to ensure that
records cannot be altered in an unauthorized manner or that such confidential records become
accessible to unauthorized persons.
4. The Authority is an authorized person when investigating the records system for initial and
continued approval or when the Authority has cause to doubt the competence of a particular
person.
(a) The organization shall have available and use the necessary equipment, tools and material
to perform the approved scope of work:
1. Where the manufacturer specifies a particular tool or equipment, the organization shall
use that tool or equipment, unless the use of alternative tooling or equipment is agreed
by the Authority via procedures specified in the exposition.
2. Equipment and tools must be permanently available, except in the case of any tool or
equipment that is so infrequently used that its permanent availability is not necessary.
Such cases shall be detailed in an exposition procedure.
3. An organization approved for base maintenance shall have sufficient aircraft access
equipment and inspection platforms/docking such that the aircraft can be properly
inspected.
(b) The organization shall ensure that all tools, equipment and particularly test equipment, as
appropriate, are controlled and calibrated according to an officially recognized standard at a
frequency to ensure serviceability and accuracy. Records of such calibrations and traceability
to the standard used shall be kept by the organization.
Once the applicant for approval has determined the intended scope of approval for consideration
by the Authority, it will be necessary to show that all tools and equipment as specified in the
maintenance data can be made available when needed. All such tools and equipment that require
to be controlled in terms of servicing or calibration by virtue of being necessary to measure
specified dimensions and torque figures etc, should be clearly identified and listed in a control
register including any personal tools and equipment that the organization agrees can be used.
1. The control of these tools and equipment requires that the organization has a procedure to
inspect/service and, where appropriate, calibrate such items on a regular basis and
indicate to users that the item is within any inspection or service or calibration time-limit. A
clear system of labeling all tooling, equipment and test equipment is therefore necessary
giving information on when the next inspection or service or calibration is due and if the
item is unserviceable for any other reason where it may not be obvious. A register should
be maintained for all precision tooling and equipment together with a record of calibrations
and standards used.
3. In this context officially recognized standard means those standards established or published
by an official body whether having legal personality or not, which are widely recognized by
the air transport sector as constituting good practice or any other standard accepted by the
Authority.
(a) All components shall be classified and appropriately segregated into the following
categories:
4. Standard parts used on an aircraft, engine, propeller or other aircraft component when
specified in the manufacturer's illustrated parts catalogue and/or the maintenance data.
5. Material both raw and consumable used in the course of maintenance when the
organization is satisfied that the material meets the required specification and has
appropriate traceability. All material must be accompanied by documentation clearly
Issue: July 2011 Page 34 of 100
CAR 145
(b) Prior to installation of a component, the organization shall ensure that the particular
component is eligible to be fitted when different modification and/or airworthiness directive
standards may be applicable.
(c) The organization may fabricate a restricted range of parts to be used in the course of
undergoing work within its own facilities provided procedures are identified in the
exposition.
(d) Components which have reached their certified life limit or contain a non-repairable defect
shall be classified as unsalvageable and shall not be permitted to re-enter the component
supply system unless certified life limits have been extended or a repair solution has been
approved according to CAR 21.
(e) The organization shall ensure that it is in compliance with GCAA Airworthiness Notice No.
22.
(a) a release document issued by an organization under the terms of a bilateral agreement
signed by the Authority; or
(b) an EASA Form 1 issued by a Part 145 organization approved by an EASA Member
State;
(c) a JAA Form 1 issued prior to September 28, 2003; or
(d) a JAA Form One issued prior to 28 September 2005 by a production organization
approved by a competent authority in accordance with its national regulations;
(e) FAA Form 8130-3; or
(f) Transport Canada Form 24-0078; or
(g) Form issued by Type Certificate holder under Authority of the State of Design; or
(h) Any other equivalent certification acceptable to the Authority.
2. For acceptance of standard parts, raw material and consumable material, refer to AMC
M.501(c) and AMC M.501(d)
The AW form 1 or equivalent identifies the status of an aircraft component. Block 12 "Remarks"
of the AW form1 in some cases contain vital airworthiness related information which may need
appropriate and necessary actions.
The receiving organization should be satisfied that the component in question is in satisfactory
condition and has been appropriately released to service. In addition, the organization should
ensure that the component meets the approved data/standard, such as the required design and
Issue: July 2011 Page 35 of 100
CAR 145
1. The agreement by the Authority for the fabrication of parts by the approved maintenance
organization should be formalized through the approval of a detailed procedure in the
Maintenance Organization Exposition. This AMC contains principles and conditions to be
taken into account for the preparation of an acceptable procedure.
2. Fabrication, inspection assembly and test should be clearly within the technical and
procedural capability of the organization;
3. All necessary data to fabricate the part should be approved either by the Authority or the type
certificate (TC) holder or CAR 21 design organization approval holder, or supplemental type
certificate (STC) holder;
4. Items fabricated by an organization approved under CAR 145 may only be used by that
organization in the course of overhaul, maintenance, modifications, or repair of aircraft or
components undergoing work within its own facility. The permission to fabricate does not
constitute approval for manufacture, or to supply externally and the parts do not qualify for
certification on AW Form 1. This prohibition also applies to the bulk transfer of surplus
inventory, in that locally fabricated parts are physically segregated and excluded from any
delivery certification.
5. Fabrication of parts, modification kits etc. for onward supply and/or sale may not be
conducted by an organization approved under CAR 145.
6. The data specified in paragraph 3 may include repair procedures involving the fabrication
of parts. Where the data on such parts is sufficient to facilitate fabrication, the parts may
be fabricated by an organization approved under CAR 145. Care should be taken to
ensure that the data include details of part numbering, dimensions, materials, processes,
and any special manufacturing techniques, special raw material specification or/and
incoming inspection requirement and that the approved organization has the necessary
capability. That capability should be defined by way of exposition content. Where special
processes or inspection procedures are defined in the approved data which are not available
at the organization the organization cannot fabricate the part unless the TC/STC-holder gives
an approved alternative.
7. Examples of fabrication under the scope of a CAR 145 approval can include but are not
limited to the following:
All the above fabricated parts, should be in accordance with data provided in overhaul or repair
manuals, modification schemes and service bulletins, drawings or otherwise approved by the
Authority.
NOTE: It is not acceptable to fabricate any item to pattern unless an engineering drawing
of the item is produced which includes any necessary fabrication processes and which is
acceptable to the Authority.
(a) Components with non-repairable defects, whether visible or not to the naked eye;
(b) Components that do not meet design specifications, and cannot be brought into
conformity with such specifications;
(c) Components subjected to unacceptable modification or rework that is irreversible;
(d) Certified life-limited parts that have reached or exceeded their certified life limits, or
have missing or incomplete records;
(e) Components that cannot be returned to airworthy condition due to exposure to extreme
forces, heat or adverse environment;
(f) Components for which conformity with an applicable airworthiness directive cannot
be accomplished;
(g) Components for which maintenance records and/or traceability to the manufacturer
cannot be retrieved.
Misrepresentation of the status of components and the practice of making such items appear
serviceable have resulted in the use of unsalvageable nonconforming Components. Therefore
Organizations disposing of unsalvageable aircraft components should consider the possibility
of such components later being misrepresented and sold as serviceable components. Caution
should be exercised to ensure that unsalvageable components are disposed of in a manner
that does not allow them to be returned to service.
(a) The organization shall hold and use applicable current maintenance data in the performance
of maintenance, including modifications and repairs. ‗Applicable‘ means relevant to any
aircraft, component or process specified in the organization's approval class rating schedule
and in any associated capability list.
(b) For the purposes of this Part, applicable maintenance data shall be any of the following:
(c) The organization shall establish procedures to ensure that if found, any inaccurate,
incomplete or ambiguous procedure, practice, information or maintenance instruction
contained in the maintenance data used by maintenance personnel is recorded and notified to
the author of the maintenance data.
(d) The organization may only modify maintenance instructions in accordance with a procedure
specified in the maintenance organization's exposition. With respect to those changes, the
organization shall demonstrate that they result in equivalent or improved maintenance
standards and shall inform the type-certificate holder of such changes. Maintenance
instructions for the purposes of this paragraph means instructions on how to carry out the
particular maintenance task: they exclude the engineering design of repairs and
modifications.
(e) The organization shall provide a common work card or worksheet system to be used
throughout relevant parts of the organization. In addition, the organization shall either
Issue: July 2011 Page 38 of 100
CAR 145
transcribe accurately the maintenance data contained in paragraphs (b) and (d) onto such
work cards or worksheets or make precise reference to the particular maintenance task or
tasks contained in such maintenance data. Work cards and worksheets may be computer
generated and held on an electronic database subject to both adequate safeguards against
unauthorized alteration and a back-up electronic database which shall be updated within 24
hours of any entry made to the main electronic database. Complex maintenance tasks shall be
transcribed onto the work cards or worksheets and subdivided into clear stages to ensure a
record of the accomplishment of the complete maintenance task.
(f) The organization shall ensure that all applicable maintenance data is readily available for use
when required by maintenance personnel.
(g) The organization shall establish a procedure to ensure that maintenance data it controls is
kept up to date. In the case of operator/customer controlled and provided maintenance data,
the organization shall be able to show that it has written confirmation from the
operator/customer that all such maintenance data is up to date and it has work orders
specifying the amendment status of the maintenance data to be used.
1. The referenced procedure should ensure that when maintenance personnel discover
inaccurate, incomplete or ambiguous information in the maintenance data they should
record the details. The procedure should then ensure that the CAR 145 approved
maintenance organization notifies the problem to the author of the maintenance data in a
timely manner. A record of such communications to the author of the maintenance data
should be retained by the CAR 145 approved organization until such time as the type
certificate holder has clarified the issue by e.g. amending the maintenance data.
The referenced procedure should address the need for a practical demonstration by the
mechanic to the quality personnel of the proposed modified maintenance instruction. When
satisfied the quality personnel should approve the modified maintenance instruction and ensure
that the type certificate or supplementary type certificate holder is informed of the modified
maintenance instruction. The procedure should include a paper/electronic traceability of the
complete process from start to finish and ensure that the relevant maintenance instruction
clearly identifies the modification. Modified maintenance instructions should only be used in
the following circumstances:
(a) Where the type certificate/supplementary type certificate holders original intent can be
carried out in a more practical or more efficient manner.
(b) Where the type certificate/supplementary type certificate holders original intent cannot
be achieved by following the maintenance instructions. For example, where a
component cannot be replaced following the original maintenance instructions.
- transcribe accurately the maintenance data onto such work cards or worksheets, or
- make precise reference to the particular maintenance task(s) contained in such
maintenance data, which already identifies the task as a CDCCL where applicable.
2. Relevant parts of the organization means with regard to aircraft base maintenance, aircraft
line workshops. Therefore, engine workshops for example should have a common system
throughout such engine workshops that may be different to that in the aircraft base
maintenance.
3. The workcards should differentiate and specify, when relevant, disassembly, accomplishment
of task, reassembly and testing. In the case of a lengthy maintenance task involving a
succession of personnel to complete such a task, it may be necessary to use supplementary
workcards or worksheets to indicate what was actually accomplished by each individual
person.
1. Data being made available to personnel maintaining aircraft means that the data should be
available in close proximity to the aircraft being maintained for supervisors mechanics and
certifying staff to study.
2. Where computer systems are used, the number of computer terminals should be sufficient in
relation to the size of the work programme to enable easy access, unless the computer system
can produce paper copies. Where microfilm or microfiche readers/printers are used, a similar
requirement is applicable.
1. To keep data up to date a procedure should be set up to monitor the amendment status of all
data and maintain a check that all amendments are being received by being a
subscriber to any document amendment scheme. Special attention should be given to TC
related data such as certification life-limited parts, airworthiness limitation and
Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALI), etc.
2. Data being made available to personnel maintaining aircraft means that the data should be
Issue: July 2011 Page 41 of 100
CAR 145
available in close proximity to the aircraft being maintained, for supervisors, mechanics and
certifying staff to study.
3. Where computer systems are used, the number of computer terminals should be sufficient in
relation to the size of the work programme to enable easy access, unless the computer
system can produce paper copies. Where microfilm or microfiche readers/printers are used, a
similar requirement is applicable.
(a) The organization shall have a system appropriate to the amount and complexity of work
to plan the availability of all necessary personnel, tools, equipment, material, maintenance
data and facilities in order to ensure the safe completion of the maintenance work.
(b) The planning of maintenance tasks, and the organizing of shifts, shall take into account
human performance limitations.
(c) When it is required to hand over the continuation or completion of maintenance tasks for
reasons of a shift or personnel changeover, relevant information shall be adequately
communicated between outgoing and incoming personnel.
1. Depending on the amount and complexity of work generally performed by the maintenance
organization, the planning system may range from a very simple procedure to a complex
organizational set-up including a dedicated planning function in support of the production
function.
2. For the purpose of CAR 145, the production planning function includes two complementary
elements:
- scheduling the maintenance work ahead, to ensure that it will not adversely
interfere with other work as regards the availability of all necessary personnel,
tools, equipment, material, maintenance data and facilities.
- during maintenance work, organizing maintenance teams and shifts and provide
all necessary support to ensure the completion of maintenance without undue
time pressure.
3. When establishing the production planning procedure, consideration should be given to the
following:
- logistics,
- inventory control,
- square meters of accommodation,
- man-hours estimation,
- man-hours availability,
Issue: July 2011 Page 42 of 100
CAR 145
- preparation of work,
- hangar availability,
- environmental conditions (access, lighting standards and cleanliness),
- co-ordination with internal and external suppliers, etc.
- scheduling of safety-critical tasks during periods when staff are likely to be most
alert.
Limitations of human performance, in the context of planning safety related tasks, refers to
the upper and lower limits, and variations, of certain aspects of human performance
(Circadian rhythm/24 hours body cycle) which personnel should be aware of when planning
work and shifts.
(a) A certificate of release to service shall be issued by appropriately authorized certifying staff
on behalf of the organization when it has been verified that all maintenance ordered has been
properly carried out by the organization in accordance with the procedures specified in
CAR145.70, taking into account the availability and use of the maintenance data specified in
CAR 145.45 and that there are no non-compliances which are known to endanger the flight
safety.
(b) A certificate of release to service shall be issued before flight at the completion of any
maintenance.
(b)(c) New defects or incomplete maintenance work orders identified during the above
maintenance shall be brought to the attention of the aircraft operator for the specific purpose
of obtaining agreement to rectify such defects or completing the missing elements of the
maintenance work order. In the case where the aircraft operator declines to have such
Issue: July 2011 Page 43 of 100
CAR 145
(c)(d) A certificate of release to service shall be issued at the completion of any maintenance on
a component whilst off the aircraft. The authorized release certificate ―AW Form1‖ referred
to in Appendix I to CAR 145 constitutes the component certificate of release to service.
When an organization maintains a component for its own use, an AW Form 1 may not be
necessary depending upon the organization‘s internal release procedures defined in the
exposition.
(d)(e) By derogation to paragraph (a), when the organization is unable to complete all
maintenance ordered, it may issue a certificate of release to service within the approved
aircraft limitations. The organization shall enter such fact in the aircraft certificate of release
to service before the issue of such certificate.
(e)(f) By derogation to paragraph (a) and CAR 145.42, when an aircraft is grounded at a
location other than the main line station or main maintenance base due to the non-
availability of a component with the appropriate release certificate, it is permissible to
temporarily fit a component without the appropriate release certificate for a maximum of
30 flight hours or until the aircraft first returns to the main line station or main maintenance
base, whichever is the sooner, subject to the aircraft operator agreement and said
component having a suitable release certificate but otherwise in compliance with all
applicable maintenance and operational requirements. Such components shall be removed
by the above prescribed time limit unless an appropriate release certificate has been
obtained in the meantime under paragraph (a) and CAR 145.42.
‗Endangers the flight safety‘ means any instances where safe operation could not be assured or
which could lead to an unsafe condition. It typically includes, but is not limited to, significant
cracking, deformation, corrosion or failure of primary structure, any evidence of burning,
electrical arcing, significant hydraulic fluid or fuel leakage and any emergency system or total
system failure. An airworthiness directive overdue for compliance is also considered a hazard to
flight safety.
'Certifies that the work specified except as otherwise specified was carried out in
accordance with CAR 145 and in respect to that work the aircraft/aircraft component is
considered fit for release to service'.
used, the introductory section of the technical log should include an example of the full
certification statement from paragraph 1.
3. The certificate of release to service should relate to the task specified in the (S)TC holder‘s or
operator‘s instructions or the aircraft maintenance program which itself may cross-refer to
maintenance data.
4. The date such maintenance was carried out should include when the maintenance took place
relative to any life or overhaul limitation in terms of date/flying hours cycles/landings etc., as
appropriate.
5. When extensive maintenance has been carried out, it is acceptable for the certificate of
release to service to summarize the maintenance as long as there is a unique cross reference
to the work package containing full details of maintenance carried out. Dimensional
information should be retained in the work-pack record.
The certificate is to be used for export/import purposes, as well as for domestic purposes, and
serves as an official certificate for items from the manufacturer/maintenance organization to
users.
It can only be issued by organizations approved by the particular competent authority within the
scope of the approval.
The certificate may be used as a rotable tag by utilising the available space on the reverse side of
the certificate for any additional information and dispatching the item with two copies of the
certificate so that one copy may be eventually returned with the item to the maintenance
organization. The alternative solution is to use existing rotable tags and also supply a copy of the
certificate.
A certificate should not be issued for any item when it is known that the item is unserviceable
except in the case of an item undergoing a series of maintenance processes at several
maintenance organizations approved under CAR145 and the item needs a certificate for the
previous maintenance process carried out for the next maintenance organization approved under
CAR145 to accept the item for subsequent maintenance processes. In such a case, a clear
statement of limitation should be endorsed in Block 12.
1. A component which has been maintained off the aircraft needs the issuance of a certificate of
release to service for such maintenance and another certificate of release to service in regard
to being installed properly on the aircraft when such action occurs.
2. In the case of the issue of AW FORM 1 for components in storage before Part-CAR 145 and
CAR 21 became effective and not released on an AW FORM 1 or equivalent in accordance
with 145.A.42(a) or removed serviceable from a serviceable aircraft or an aircraft which has
been withdrawn from service the following applies:
2.1 An AW FORM 1 may be issued for an aircraft component which has been:
Removed from aircraft which have been withdrawn from service, or from aircraft
which have been involved in abnormal occurrences such as accidents, incidents,
heavy landings or lightning strikes.
2.3 For the purposes of this AMC No 2 only, appropriately rated means an organization
with an approval class rating for the type of component or for the product in which it
may be installed.
2.4.1 When the last maintenance was carried out and by whom.
2.4.2 If the component is unused, when the component was manufactured and
by whom with a cross-reference to any original documentation which
should be included with the Form.
2.4.4 Detail of life used for service life-limited parts being any combination of
fatigue, overhaul or storage life.
2.4.5 For any aircraft component having its own maintenance history record,
reference to the particular maintenance history record as long as the record
contains the details that would otherwise be required in block 12. The
maintenance history record and acceptance test report or statement, if
applicable, should be attached to the AW FORM 1.
NOTE 1: It should be understood that the release of a stored but unused aircraft
component in accordance with this paragraph represents a maintenance release under
CAR145 and not a production release under CAR21. It is not intended to bypass the
production release procedure agreed by the GCAA for parts and subassemblies intended
for fitment on the manufacturers‟ own production line.
(a) An acceptance test report or statement should be available for all used and unused aircraft
components that are subjected to acceptance testing after manufacturing or maintenance
as appropriate.
(b) The aircraft component should be inspected for compliance with the manufacturer‘s
instructions and limitations for storage and condition including any requirement for
limited storage life, inhibitors, controlled climate and special storage containers. In
addition or in the absence of specific storage instructions the aircraft component should
be inspected for damage, corrosion and leakage to ensure good condition.
(c) The storage life used of any storage life-limited parts should be established.
2.6.1 Serviceable aircraft components removed from a UAE registered aircraft may
be issued with an AW FORM 1 by an appropriately rated organization subject
to compliance with this subparagraph.
(a) The organization should ensure that the component was removed from the
aircraft by an appropriately qualified person.
(b) The aircraft component may only be deemed serviceable if the last flight
operation with the component fitted revealed no faults on that component/
related system.
(d) The aircraft record should be researched for any unusual events that could
affect the serviceability of the aircraft component such as involvement in
accidents, incidents, heavy landings or lightning strikes. Under no
circumstances may an AW FORM 1 be issued in accordance with this
paragraph 2.6 if it is suspected that the aircraft component has been
subjected to extremes of stress, temperatures or immersion which could
effect its operation.
(e) A maintenance history record should be available for all used serialized
aircraft components.
2.6.2 Serviceable aircraft components removed from a foreign registered aircraft may
only be issued with an AW FORM 1 if the components are leased or loaned
Issue: July 2011 Page 48 of 100
CAR 145
from the maintenance organization approved under CAR 145 who retains
control of the airworthiness status of the components. An AW FORM 1 may be
issued and should contain the information as specified in paragraph 2.4
including the aircraft from which the aircraft components was removed.
2.7 Used aircraft components removed from an aircraft withdrawn from service.
Serviceable aircraft components removed from a UAE registered aircraft withdrawn
from service may be issued with an AW FORM 1 by a maintenance organization
approved under CAR145 subject to compliance with this subparagraph.
(a) Aircraft withdrawn from service are sometimes dismantled for spares.
This is considered to be a maintenance activity and should be
accomplished under the control of an organization approved under
CAR145, employing procedures approved by the competent authority.
(c) As a minimum, the assessment will need to satisfy the standards set out in
paragraphs 2.5 and 2.6 as appropriate. This should, where known, include
the possible need for the alignment of scheduled maintenance that may be
necessary to comply with the maintenance programme applicable to the
aircraft on which the component is to be installed.
(f) All recorded aircraft defects should be reviewed and the possible effects
these may have on both normal and standby functions of removed
components are to be considered.
(h) Suitable CAR145 facilities for the removal and storage of removed
components are to be used which include suitable environmental
conditions, lighting, access equipment, aircraft tooling and storage
facilities for the work to be undertaken. While it may be acceptable for
components to be removed, given local environmental conditions, without
the benefit of an enclosed facility, subsequent disassembly (if required)
and storage of the components should be in accordance with the
manufacturer‘s recommendations.
(a) dismantling the component for sufficient inspection in accordance with the
appropriate maintenance data;
1. Being unable to establish full compliance with sub-paragraph CAR 145.50(a) means that
the maintenance required by the aircraft operator could not be completed due either to
running out of available aircraft maintenance downtime for the scheduled check or by
virtue of the condition of the aircraft requiring additional maintenance downtime.
2. The aircraft operator is responsible for ensuring that all required maintenance has been
carried out before flight and therefore CAR 145.50(e) requires such operator to be informed
in the case where full compliance with CAR 145.50(a) cannot be achieved within the
operators limitations. If the operator agrees to the deferment of full compliance, then the
certificate of release to service may be issued subject to details of the deferment, including
the operator‘s authority being endorsed on the certificate.
NOTE: Whether or not the aircraft operator does have the authority to defer
maintenance is an issue between the aircraft operator and its Authority. In case of doubt
concerning such a decision of the operator, the approved maintenance organization should
inform the Operator Authority of such doubt, before issue of the certificate of release to
service. This will allow the Operator Authority to investigate the matter as appropriate
3. The procedure should draw attention to the fact that CAR 145.50 (a) does not normally
permit the issue of a certificate of release to service in the case of non-compliance and should
state what action the mechanic, supervisor and certifying staff should take to bring the matter
to the attention of the relevant department or person responsible for technical co-ordination
with the aircraft operator so that the issue may be discussed and resolved with the aircraft
operator. In addition, the appropriate person(s) as specified in CAR145.30(b) should be kept
informed in writing of such possible non-compliance situations and this should be included
in the procedure.
1. Suitable release certificate means a certificate which clearly states that the aircraft
component is serviceable; that clearly specifies the organization releasing said component
together with details of the Authority under whose approval the organization works
including the approval or authorization reference.
2. Compliance with all other CAR 145 and operator requirements means making an appropriate
entry in the aircraft technical log, checking for compliance with type design standards,
modifications, repairs, airworthiness directives, life limitations and condition of the aircraft
component plus information on where, when and why the aircraft was grounded.
Maintenance documentation used, including the revision status, for all work performed and not
limited to the entry made in block 11.
(a) The organization shall record all details of maintenance work carried out. As a minimum,
the organization shall retain records necessary to prove that all requirements have been
met for issuance of the certificate of release to service, including subcontractor's release
documents.
(b) The organization shall provide a copy of each certificate of release to service to the
aircraft operator, together with a copy of any specific approved repair/modification data
used for repairs/modifications carried out.
(c) The organization shall retain a copy of all detailed maintenance records and any
associated maintenance data for three years from the date the aircraft or component to
which the work relates was released from the organization.
1. Records under this paragraph shall be stored in a manner that ensures protection
from damage, alteration, and theft.
2. Computer backup discs, tapes etc. shall be stored in a different location from
that containing the working discs, tapes etc., in an environment that ensures they
remain in good condition.
3. Where an organization approved under this Part terminates its operation, all
retained maintenance records covering the last two years shall be distributed to the
last owner or customer of the respective aircraft or component or shall be stored as
specified by the Authority.
Associated maintenance data is specific information such as repair and modification data. This
does not necessarily require the retention of all Aircraft Maintenance Manual, Component
Maintenance Manual, IPC etc issued by the TC holder or STC holder. Maintenance records
should refer to the revision status of the data used.
1. Properly executed and retained records provide owners, operators and maintenance
personnel with information essential in controlling unscheduled and scheduled maintenance,
and troubleshooting to eliminate the need for re-inspection and rework to establish
airworthiness. The prime objective is to have secure and easily retrievable records with
comprehensive and legible contents. The aircraft record should contain basic details of all
serialized aircraft components and all other significant aircraft components installed, to
ensure traceability to such installed aircraft component documentation and associated
2. Some gas turbine engines are assembled from modules and a true total time in service for a
total engine is not kept. When owners and operators wish to take advantage of the
modular design, then total time in service and maintenance records for each module is to
be maintained. The maintenance records as specified are to be kept with the module and
should show compliance with any mandatory requirements pertaining to that module.
4. The maintenance record can be either a paper or computer system or any combination of
both.
5. Paper systems should use robust material which can withstand normal handling and filing.
The record should remain legible throughout the required retention period. Computer
systems may be used to control maintenance and/or record details of maintenance work
carried out. Computer systems used for maintenance should have at least one backup
system which should be updated at least within 24 hours of any maintenance. Each
terminal is required to contain programme safeguards against the ability of unauthorized
personnel to alter the database.
(a) The organization shall report to the Authority, the state of registry and the organization
responsible for the design of the aircraft or component any condition of the aircraft
or component identified by the organization that has resulted or may result in an
unsafe condition that hazards seriously the flight safety.
(b) The organization shall establish an internal occurrence reporting system as detailed in the
exposition to enable the collection and evaluation of such reports, including the
assessment and extraction of those occurrences to be reported under paragraph (a). This
procedure shall identify adverse trends, corrective actions taken or to be taken by the
organization to address deficiencies and include evaluation of all known relevant
information relating to such occurrences and a method to circulate the information as
necessary.
(c) The organization shall make such reports in a form and manner established by the
Authority and ensure that they contain all pertinent information about the condition and
evaluation results known to the organization.
Issue: July 2011 Page 53 of 100
CAR 145
(d) Where the organization is contracted by a commercial operator to carry out maintenance,
the organization shall also report to the operator any such condition affecting the
operator's aircraft or component.
(e) The organization shall produce and submit such reports as soon as practicable but in any
case within 72 hours of the organization identifying the condition to which the report relates.
1. The aim of occurrence reporting is to identify the factors contributing to incidents, and to
make the system resistant to similar errors.
2. An occurrence reporting system should enable and encourage free and frank reporting of
any (potentially) safety related occurrence. This will be facilitated by the establishment of a
just culture. An organization should ensure that personnel are not inappropriately punished
for reporting or co-operating with occurrence investigations.
3. The internal reporting process should be closed-loop, ensuring that actions are taken
internally to address safety hazards.
The organization responsible for the design is normally the TC holder of the aircraft, engine
or propeller and/or if known the STC holder.
CAR 145.65 Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
(a) The organization shall establish a safety and quality policy for the organization to be
included in the exposition under CAR 145.70.
NOTE: As of 31 December 2010, the organization‟s safety policy required by paragraph (a)
shall be submitted to the Authority in compliance with the requirements of Safety
Management System established and implementation as specified in CAR PART X.
(b) The organization shall establish procedures agreed by the Authority taking into account
human factors and human performance to ensure good maintenance practices and compliance
with this Part which shall include a clear work order or contract such that aircraft and
components may be released to service in accordance with CAR 145.50.
1. The maintenance procedures under this paragraph apply to CAR 145.25 to CAR145.95.
3. With regard to aircraft line and base maintenance, the organization shall establish
procedures to minimize the risk of multiple errors and capture errors on critical systems,
and to ensure that no person is required to carry out and inspect in relation to a
maintenance task involving some element of disassembly/reassembly of several
components of the same type fitted to more than one system on the same aircraft during a
particular maintenance check. However, when only one person is available to carry out
these tasks then the organization's work card or worksheet shall include an additional
stage for re-inspection of the work by this person after completion of all the same tasks.
Maintenance organization must also establish procedures for duplicate inspections as per
CAR Part V, Chapter 2, Section 9.
(c) The organization shall establish a quality system that includes the following:
2. A quality feedback reporting system to the person or group of persons specified in CAR
145.30(b) and ultimately to the accountable manager that ensures proper and timely
corrective action is taken in response to reports resulting from the independent audits
Issue: July 2011 Page 55 of 100
CAR 145
AMC 145.65(a) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
The safety and quality policy should as a minimum include a statement committing the
organization to:
AMC 145.65(b) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. Maintenance procedures should be held current such that they reflect best practice within
the organization. It is the responsibility of all organization‘s employees to report any
differences via their organization‘s internal occurrence reporting mechanisms.
2. All procedures, and changes to those procedures, should be verified and validated before
use where practicable.
3. All technical procedures should be designed and presented in accordance with good
human factors principles.
AMC 145.65(b)(2) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
Specialized services include any specialized activity, such as, but not limited to non-destructive
testing requiring particular skills and/or qualification. 145.30(f) covers the qualification of
personnel but, in addition, there is a need to establish maintenance procedures that cover the
control of any specialized process.
AMC 145.65(b)(3) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. The purpose of this procedure is to minimize the rare possibility of an error being repeated
whereby the identical aircraft components are not reassembled thereby compromising more
than one system. One example is the remote possibility of failure to reinstall engine gearbox
access covers or oil filler caps on all engines of a multiengine aircraft resulting in major oil
loss from all engines.
Another example is the case of removal and re-fitment of oil filler caps, which should require
a re-inspection of all oil filler caps after the last oil filler cap has supposedly been refitted.
2. Procedures should be established to detect and rectify maintenance errors that could, as a
Issue: July 2011 Page 56 of 100
CAR 145
minimum, result in a failure, malfunction, or defect endangering the safe operation of the
aircraft if not performed properly. The procedure should identify the method for capturing
errors, and the maintenance tasks or processes concerned.
In order to determine the work items to be considered, the following maintenance tasks
should primarily be reviewed to assess their impact on safety:
3. In order to prevent omissions, every maintenance task or group of tasks should be signed-
off. To ensure the task or group of tasks is completed it should only be signed-off after
completion. Work by unauthorized personnel (i.e. temporary staff, trainee) should be
checked by authorized personnel before they sign-off. The grouping of tasks for the purpose
of signing-off should allow critical steps to be clearly identified.
4. The maintenance organization should ensure that when carrying out a modification, repair or
maintenance, Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations are not compromised; this
will require the development of appropriate procedures where necessary by the maintenance
organization. The maintenance organization should pay particular attention to possible
adverse effects of any wiring change to the aircraft, even a change not specifically associated
with the fuel tank system. For example, it should be common practice to identify segregation
of fuel gauging system wiring as a Critical Design Configuration Control Limitation.
Maintenance organizations can prevent adverse effects associated with wiring changes by
standardizing maintenance practices through training, rather than by periodic inspection.
Training should be provided to end indiscriminate routing and splicing of wire and to provide
comprehensive knowledge of critical design features of fuel tank systems that would be
controlled by a Critical Design Configuration Control Limitation. Current guidance is
provided for training to maintenance organization personnel in an Appendix IV to AMC
CAR 145.30e.
The maintenance of ignition prevention features is necessary for the inherent safety and
Issue: July 2011 Page 57 of 100
CAR 145
reliability of an aircraft‘s fuel tank system. The aircraft cannot be operated indefinitely with
the failure of an ignition prevention feature. The failure will have a direct adverse effect on
operational safety. It could prevent the continued safe flight and landing of the aircraft or
cause serious or fatal injury to the occupants. The fuel system revie required will identify
ignition prevention features of the design. The failure of any of these features may not
immediately result in an unsafe condition, but it may warrant certain maintenance to support
continued airworthiness. (refer to appendix to AMC 706 (f))
AMC 145.65(c)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. The primary objectives of the quality system are to enable the organization to ensure that it
can deliver a safe product and that organization remains in compliance with the
requirements.
3. The independent audit is an objective process of routine sample checks of all aspects of
the organization‘s ability to carry out all maintenance to the required standards and
includes some product sampling as this is the end result of the maintenance process. It
represents an objective overview of the complete maintenance related activities and is
intended to complement the CAR 145.50(a) requirement for certifying staff to be satisfied
that all required maintenance has been properly carried out before issue of the certificate of
release to service. Independent audits should include a percentage of random audits
carried out on a sample basis when maintenance is being carried out. This means some
audits during the night for those organizations that work at night.
4. Except as specified in sub-paragraphs 7 and 9, the independent audit should ensure that all
aspects of CAR 145 compliance are checked every 12 months and may be carried out as a
complete single exercise or subdivided over the 12 month period in accordance with a
scheduled plan. The independent audit does not require each procedure to be checked
against each product line when it can be shown that the particular procedure is common to
more than one product line and the procedure has-been checked every 12 months without
resultant findings. Where findings have been identified, the particular procedure should be
rechecked against other product lines until the findings have been rectified after which the
independent audit procedure may revert back to 12 monthly for the particular procedure.
For the purpose of the independent audit a product line includes any product under an
Appendix 2 approval class rating as specified in the approval schedule issued to the
particular organization. It therefore follows for example that a maintenance organization
approved under CAR 145 with a capability to maintain aircraft, repair engines, brakes and
Issue: July 2011 Page 58 of 100
CAR 145
autopilots would need to carry out 4 complete audit sample checks each year except as
specified otherwise in subparagraphs 5, 7 or 9.
6. The sample check of a product means to witness any relevant testing and visually inspect the
product and associated documentation. The sample check should not involve repeat
disassembly or testing unless the sample check identifies findings requiring such action.
8. Except as specified otherwise in sub-paragraph 9, where the organization has line stations
listed as per CAR 145.75 (d) the quality system should describe how these are integrated
into the system and include a plan to audit each listed line station at a frequency consistent
with the extent of flight activity at the particular line station. Except as specified otherwise
in sub-paragraph 9 the maximum period between audits of a particular line station
should not exceed 24 months.
9. Except as specified otherwise in sub-paragraph 5, the Authority may agree to increase any of
the audit time periods specified in this AMC 145.65 (c)(1) by up to 100% provided that
there are no safety related findings and subject to being satisfied that the organization has a
good record of rectifying findings in a timely manner.
10. A report should be raised each time an audit is carried out describing what was checked
and the resulting findings against applicable requirements, procedures and products.
11. The independence of the audit should be established by always ensuring that audits are
carried out by personnel not responsible for the function, procedure or products being
checked. It therefore follows that a large maintenance organization approved under CAR
145, being an organization with more than about 500 maintenance staff should have a
dedicated quality audit group whose sole function is to conduct audits, raise finding reports
and follow up to check that findings are being rectified. For the medium sized maintenance
organization approved under CAR 145, being an organization with less than about 500
maintenance staff, it is acceptable to use competent personnel in accordance with CAR
145.30(e from one section/department not responsible for the production function, procedure
or product to audit the section/department that is responsible subject to the overall planning
and implementation being under the control of the quality manager. Organizations with a
maximum of 10 maintenance staff actively engaged in carrying out maintenance may
contract the independent audit element of the quality system to another organization or a
qualified and person approved by the Authority.
AMC 145.65(c)(2) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
2. The quality feedback system may not be contracted to outside persons. The principal
function of the quality feedback system is to ensure that all findings resulting from the
independent quality audits of the organization are properly investigated and corrected in a
timely manner and to enable the accountable manager to be kept informed of any safety
issues and the extent of compliance with CAR 145.
4. The accountable manager should hold regular meetings with staff to check progress on
rectification except that in the large organizations such meetings may be delegated on a
day to day basis to the quality manager subject to the accountable manager meeting at
least twice per year with the senior staff involved to review the overall performance and
receiving at least a half yearly summary report on findings of non-compliance.
5. All records pertaining to the independent quality audit and the quality feedback system
should be retained for at least 2 years after the date of clearance of the finding to which
they refer or for such periods as to support changes to the AMC145.65(c)(1) sub- paragraph
9 audit time periods, whichever is the longer.
GM 145.65(c)(1) Safety and quality policy, maintenance procedures and quality system
1. The purpose of this GM is to give guidance on just one acceptable working audit plan to
meet part of the needs of 145.65 (c)1. There is any number of other acceptable working audit
plans.
2. The proposed plan lists the subject matter that should be covered by the audit and attempts to
indicate applicability in the various types of workshops and aircraft facilities. The list should
therefore be tailored for the particular situation and more than one list may be necessary.
Each list should be shown against a timetable to indicate when the particular item is
scheduled for audit and when the audit was completed
(a) ‗Maintenance organization exposition‘ means the document or documents that contain the
material specifying the scope of work deemed to constitute approval and showing how the
organization intends to comply with this Part. The organization shall provide the Authority
with a maintenance organization exposition, containing the following information:
3. the title(s) and name(s) of the persons nominated under CAR 145.30(b);
4. the duties and responsibilities of the persons nominated under CAR 145.30(b), including
matters on which they may deal directly with the Authority on behalf of the
organization;
12. the procedures and quality system established by the organization under CAR 145.25 to
CAR 145.90;
13. a list of commercial operators, where applicable, to which the organization provides an
aircraft maintenance service;
(b) The exposition shall be amended as necessary to remain an up-to-date description of the
organization. The exposition and any subsequent amendment shall be approved by the
Authority.
(c) Reserved
The information specified in CAR 145.70 (a) sub - paragraphs (6) and (12) to (16) inclusive,
whilst a part of the maintenance organization exposition, may be kept as separate documents
or on separate electronic data files subject to the management part of said exposition
containing a clear cross reference to such documents or electronic data files.
The exposition should contain the information, as applicable, specified in this AMC. The
information may be presented in any subject order so long as all applicable subjects are
covered. Where an organization uses a different format, for example, to allow the exposition to
serve for more than one approval, then the exposition should contain a cross reference Annex
using this list as an index with an explanation as to where in the exposition the subject matter
can be found in the exposition.
The exposition should contain information, as applicable, on how the maintenance organization
complies with Critical Design Configuration Control Limitation (CDCCL) instructions.
Small maintenance organizations may combine the various items to form a simple exposition
more relevant to their needs.
The operator may use electronic data processing (EDP) for publication of the maintenance
Issue: July 2011 Page 63 of 100
CAR 145
PART 1 MANAGEMENT
PART 4
PART 5
This section is reserved for those maintenance organizations approved under CAR 145 who are
also operators.
PART 7 Reserved
PART 8 Reserved
1. The purpose of the maintenance organization exposition (MOE) is to set forth the
procedures, means and methods of the organization.
2. Compliance with its contents will assure compliance with the requirements of CAR 145,
which is a pre-requisite to obtaining and retaining an approved maintenance organization
approval certificate.
3. CAR 145.70 (a)(1) to (a)(11) constitutes the 'management' part of the MOE and therefore
could be produced as one document and made available to the person(s) specified under
CAR 145.30 (b) who should be reasonably familiar with its contents. CAR 145.70(a)(6) list
of certifying staff and B1 and B2 support staff may be produced as a separate document.
4. CAR 145.70 (a)(12) constitutes the working procedures of the organization and therefore
as stated in the requirement may be produced as any number of separate procedures
manuals. It should be remembered that these documents should be cross referenced from the
management MOE.
5. Personnel are expected to be familiar with those parts of the manuals that are relevant to
the maintenance work they carry out.
6. The organization should specify in the MOE who should amend the manual particularly in
the case where there are several parts.
7. The quality manager should be responsible for monitoring the amendment of the MOE,
unless otherwise agreed by the Authority, including associated procedures manuals and
submission of the proposed amendments to the Authority. However the Authority may agree
via a procedure stated in the amendment section of the MOE that some defined class of
amendments may be incorporated without prior approval by the Authority.
9. The accountable manager‘s exposition statement as specified under CAR 145.70(a)(1) should
embrace the intent of the following paragraph and in fact this statement may be used without
amendment. Any modification to the statement should not alter the intent.
'This exposition and any associated referenced manuals define the organization and
procedures upon which the (Authority) CAR 145 approval is based as required by
CAR145.70. These procedures are approved by the undersigned and should be complied
with, as applicable, when work orders are being progressed under the terms of the CAR
145 approval.
It is accepted that these procedures do not override the necessity of complying with any
new or amended regulation published by the (Authority) from time to time where these new
or amended regulations are in conflict with these procedures.
It is understood that the (Authority) will approve this organization whilst the (Authority) is
satisfied that the procedures are being followed and work standards maintained. It is further
understood that the (Authority) reserves the right to suspend, limit or revoke the approval of
the organization if the (Authority) has evidence that procedures are not followed or standards
not upheld.
Signed........................................
Dated..........................................
NOTE: Whenever the accountable manager changes it is important to ensure that the
new accountable manager signs the paragraph 9 statement at the earliest opportunity.
Failure to carry out this action could invalidate the CAR 145 approval.
When an organization is approved against any other Part containing a requirement for
an exposition, a supplement covering the differences will suffice to meet the
requirements except that the supplement should have an index showing where those parts
missing from the supplement are covered.
In accordance with the approved exposition, the organization and the GCAA approval shall be
entitled to carry out the following tasks:
(a) Maintain any aircraft and/or component for which it is approved at the locations identified
in the approval certificate and in the exposition;
(b) Arrange for maintenance of any aircraft or component for which it is approved at another
organization that is working under the quality system of the organization. This refers to
work being carried out by an organization not itself appropriately approved to carry out
such maintenance under this Part and is limited to the work scope permitted under CAR
145.65(b) procedures. This work scope shall not include a base maintenance check of an
aircraft or a complete workshop maintenance check or overhaul of an engine or engine
module;
(c) Maintain any aircraft or any component for which it is approved at any location subject to
the need for such maintenance arising either from the unserviceability of the aircraft or
from the necessity of supporting occasional line maintenance, subject to the conditions
specified in the exposition;
(d) Maintain any aircraft and/or component for which it is approved at a location identified as
a line maintenance location capable of supporting minor maintenance and only if the
organization exposition both permits such activity and lists such locations;
1. Working under the quality system of an organization appropriately approved under CAR 145
(sub contracting) refers to the case of one organization, not itself appropriately approved to
CAR 145 that carries out aircraft line maintenance or minor engine maintenance or
maintenance of other aircraft components or a specialized service as a subcontractor for an
organization appropriately approved under CAR 145. To be properly approved to subcontract
the organization should have a procedure for the control of such subcontractors as described
below. Any approved maintenance organization that carries out maintenance for another
approved maintenance organization within its own approval scope is not considered to be
subcontracting for the purpose of this paragraph.
NOTE: For those organizations approved under CAR 145 that are also certificated by
the FAA under FAR Part 145 it should be noted that FAR Part 145 is more restrictive in
respect of maintenance activities that can be contracted or sub-contracted to another
maintenance organization. It is therefore recommended that any listing of contracted or
sub-contracted maintenance organizations should identify which meet the CAR 145
criteria and which meet the FAR Part 145 criteria.
3.1 The fundamental reasons for allowing an organization approved under CAR 145 to
sub-contract certain maintenance tasks are:
Issue: July 2011 Page 69 of 100
CAR 145
(a) To permit the acceptance of specialized maintenance services, such as, but not
limited to, plating, heat treatment, plasma spray, fabrication of specified parts
for minor repairs/modifications, etc., without the need for direct approval by the
Authority in such cases.
(b) To permit the acceptance of aircraft maintenance up to but not including a base
maintenance check as specified in CAR 145.75(b) by organizations not
appropriately approved under CAR 145 when it is unrealistic to expect direct
approval by the Authority. The Authority will determine when it is unrealistic.
3.2 When maintenance is carried out under the sub-contract control system it means that for
the duration of such maintenance, the CAR 145 approval has been temporarily extended
to include the sub-contractor. It therefore follows that those parts of the sub-contractor‘s
facilities personnel and procedures involved with the maintenance organization‘s
products undergoing maintenance should meet CAR 145 requirements for the duration of
that maintenance and it remains the organization‘s responsibility to ensure such
requirements are satisfied.
3.3 For the criteria specified in sub-paragraph 3.1 the organization is not required to
have complete facilities for maintenance that it needs to sub-contract but it should have
its own expertise to determine that the sub-contractor meets the necessary standards.
However an organization cannot be approved unless it has the in-house facilities,
procedures and expertise to carry out the majority of maintenance for which it wishes
to be approved in terms of the number of class ratings.
3.4 The organization may find it necessary to include several specialist subcontractors
to enable it to be approved to completely certify the release to service of a particular
product. Examples could be specialist welding, electro-plating, painting etc. To
authorize the use of such subcontractors, the Authority will need to be satisfied that
the organization has the necessary expertise and procedures to control such sub-
contractors.
3.5 An organization working outside the scope of its approval schedule is deemed to be
not approved. Such an organization may in this circumstance operate only under the
sub-contract control of another organization approved under CAR 145.
4.2 The organization approved under CAR 145 needs to assess to what extent it will use
the sub-contractor‘s facilities. As a general rule the organization should require its own
paperwork, approved data and material/spare parts to be used, but it could permit the
use of tools, equipment and personnel from the sub-contractor as long as such tools,
equipment and personnel meet the requirement of CAR 145. In the case of sub-
contractors who provide specialized services it may for practical reasons be necessary
to use their specialized services personnel, approved data and material subject to
acceptance by the organization approved under CAR 145.
4.3 Unless the sub-contracted maintenance work can be fully inspected on receipt by
the organization approved under CAR 145 it will be necessary for such organization to
supervise the inspection and release from the sub-contractor. Such activities should be
fully described in the organization procedure. The organization will need to consider
whether to use its own staff or authorize the sub-contractor's staff.
4.4 The certificate of release to service may be issued either at the sub-contractor or at
the organization facility by staff issued a certification authorization in accordance with
CAR 145.30 as appropriate, by the organization approved under CAR 145. Such staff
would normally come from the organization approved under CAR 145 but may
otherwise be a person from the sub-contractor who meets the approved maintenance
organization certifying staff standard which itself is approved by the Authority via
the maintenance organization exposition. The certificate of release to service and the
A/W Form 1 will always be issued under the maintenance organization approval
reference.
4.5 The sub-contract control procedure will need to record audits of the subcontractor, to
have a corrective action follow up plan and to know when subcontractors are being
used. The procedure should include a clear revocation process for sub-contractors who
do not meet the CAR 145 approved maintenance organization‘s requirements.
4.6 The CAR 145 quality audit staff will need to audit the sub-contract control section
and sample audit sub-contractors unless this task is already carried out by the quality
audit staff as stated in sub-paragraph 4.1.
4.7 The contract between the CAR 145 approved maintenance organization and the sub-
contractor should contain a provision for the Authority team staff to have right of access
to the sub-contractor.
The organization shall only maintain an aircraft or component for which it is approved when
all the necessary facilities, equipment, tooling, material, maintenance data and certifying staff
are available.
This paragraph is intended to cover the situation where the larger organization may temporarily
not hold all the necessary tools, equipment etc., for an aircraft type or variant specified in the
organization's approval. This paragraph means that the Authority need not amend the approval
to delete the aircraft type or variants on the basis that it is a temporary situation and there is a
commitment from the organization to re-acquire tools, equipment etc. before maintenance on
the type may recommence.
The organization shall notify the Authority of any proposal to carry out any of the following
changes before such changes take place to enable the Authority to determine continued
compliance with this Part and to amend, if necessary, the approval certificate, except that in
the case of proposed changes in personnel not known to the management beforehand, these
changes must be notified at the earliest opportunity:
The primary purpose of this paragraph is to enable the organization to remain approved if
agreed by the Authority during negotiations about any of the specified changes. Without this
paragraph the approval would automatically be suspended in all cases.
(a) An approval once issued shall be valid for the period specified in the approval certificate
and shall remain valid subject to:
(b) Upon surrender or revocation, the approval shall be returned to the authority.
(a) A level 1 finding is any significant non-compliance with CAR 145 requirements which
lowers the safety standard and hazards seriously the flight safety.
(b) A level 2 finding is any non-compliance with the CAR 145 requirements which could
lower the safety standard and possibly hazard the flight safety.
(c) After receipt of notification of findings from the authority, the holder of the
maintenance organization approval shall define a corrective action plan and demonstrate
corrective action to the satisfaction of the Authority within a period agreed with this
Authority.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
to CAR 145
1. General Civil Aviation Authority 2. AUTHORISED RELEASE CERTIFICATE 3. Form Tracking Number
United Arab Emirates
AW FORM 1
4. Organisation Name and Address 5. Work Order/Contract/Invoice
6. Item 7. Description 8. Part Number 9. Qty. 10. Serial Number 11. Status/Work
12. Remarks
13a. Certifies that the items identified above were manufactured in 14a. CAR 145.50 Release to Service Other regulation, specified in block 12
conformity to: Certifies that unless otherwise specified in block 12, the work identified in block
Approved design data and are in condition for safe operation 11 and described in block 12, was accomplished in accordance with CAR 145 and
Non-approved design data specified in block 12 in respect to that work the items are considered ready for release to service.
13b. Authorised Signature 13c. Approved/Authorised Number 14b. Authorised Signature 14c. Certified/Approved Ref. Number
13d. Name 13e. Date (dd mmm yyyy) 14d. Name 14e. Date (dd mmm yyyy)
USER/INSTALLER RESPONSIBILITIES
This certificate does not automatically constitute authority to install the item(s).
Where the user/installer performs work in accordance with regulations of an airworthiness authority different than the airworthiness authority specified in
block 1, it is essential that the user/installer ensures his/her airworthiness authority accepts items from the airworthiness authority specified in block 1.
Statements in blocks 13a and 14a do not constitute installation certification. In all cases aircraft maintenance records must contain an installation certification
issued in accordance with the national regulations by the user/installer before the aircraft may be flown.
Issue: 01 July 2011 Issue: 2
GENERAL
The certificate shall comply with the format attached including block numbers in that each block
must be located as per the layout. The size of each block may however be varied to suit the
individual application, but not to the extent that would make the certificate unrecognizable.
The overall size of the certificate may be significantly increased or decreased so long as the
certificate remains recognizable and legible. If in doubt consult the Authority.
The certificate shall either be pre-printed or computer generated but in either case the
printing of lines and characters must be clear and legible. Pre-printed wording is permitted in
accordance with the attached model but no other certification statements are permitted.
The space remaining on the reverse side of the certificate may be used by the originator for any
additional information but must not include any certification statement.
The original certificate must accompany the items and correlation must be established
between the certificate and the items. A copy of the certificate must be retained by the
organization that manufactured or maintained the item. Where the certificate format and data is
entirely computer generated, it is permissible to retain the certificate format and data on a
secure database.
Where a single certificate was used to release a number of items and those items are
subsequently separated out from each other, such as through a parts distributor, then a copy of
the original certificate must accompany such items and the original certificate must be retained
by the organization that received the batch of items. Failure to retain the original certificate could
invalidate the release status of the items.
NOTE: There is no restriction in the number of copies of the certificate sent to the
customer or retained by the originator.
The certificate that accompanies the item may be attached to the item by being placed in an
envelope for durability.
These instructions relate only to the use of the AW Form 1 for production purposes.
Attention is drawn to Appendix I to CAR145 and Appendix II to CAR M which cover the use
of the AW Form 1 for maintenance purposes.
A primary purpose of the Certificate is to declare the airworthiness of new aviation maintenance
work undertaken on products, parts and appliances (hereafter referred to as ‗item(s)‘).
Correlation must be established between the Certificate and the item(s). The originator must
retain a Certificate in a form that allows verification of the original data.
The Certificate does not constitute approval to install the item on a particular aircraft, engine, or
propeller but helps the end user determine its airworthiness approval status.
A mixture of production released and maintenance released items is not permitted on the
same Certificate.
A mixture of items certified in conformity with ‗approved data‘ and to ‗non-approved data‘ is
not permitted on the same Certificate.
2. GENERAL FORMAT
The Certificate must comply with the format attached including block numbers and the location
of each block. The size of each block may however be varied to suit the individual application,
but not to the extent that would make the Certificate unrecognizable.
The Certificate must be in ‗landscape‘ format but the overall size may be significantly increased
or decreased so long as the Certificate remains recognizable and legible. If in doubt consult the
GCAA Competent Authority.
The User/Installer responsibility statement can be placed on reverse side or on the front by
reducing the depth of the Certificateeither side of the form.
The Certificate may either be pre-printed or computer generated but in either case the printing of
lines and characters must be clear and legible and in accordance with the defined format.
The Certificate should be in English, and if appropriate, in one or more other languages.
The details to be entered on the Certificate may be either machine/computer printed or hand-
written using block letters and must permit easy reading.
The space remaining on the reverse side of the Certificate may be used by the originator for
any additional information but must not include any certification statement. Any use of the
reverse side of the Certificate must be referenced in the appropriate block on the front side of the
Certificate.
3. COPIES
The originator must retain the Certificate in athed form that allows verification of the original
data
There is no restriction in the number of copies of the Certificate sent to the customer or retained
by the originator.
4. ERROR(S) ON A CERTIFICATE
The new Certificate must have a new tracking number, signature and date.
The request for a new Certificate may be honoured without re-verification of the item(s)
condition. The new Certificate is not a statement of current condition and should refer to the
previous Certificate in block 12 by the following statement; ―This Certificate corrects the
error(s) in block(s) [enter block(s) corrected] of the Certificate [enter original tracking number]
dated [enter original issuance date] and does not cover conformity/condition/release to service‖.
Both Certificates should be retained according to the retention period associated with the first.
Except as otherwise stated, there must be an entry in all blocks to make the document a valid
certificate.
Enter the unique number established by the numbering system/procedure of the organization
identified in block 4; this may include alpha/numeric characters.
Enter the full name and address of the production organization releasing the item(s) covered by
this Certificate. Logos, etc., of the organization are permitted if they can be contained within the
block.
To facilitate customer traceability of the item(s), enter the work order number, contract number,
invoice number, or similar reference number.
Block 6 Item
Enter line item numbers when there is more than one line item. This block permits easy cross-
referencing to the Remarks block 12.
Block 7 Description
Enter the name or description of the item. Preference should be given to the term used in the
instructions for continued airworthiness or maintenance data (e.g. Illustrated Parts Catalogue,
Aircraft Maintenance Manual, Service Bulletin, Component Maintenance manual).
Enter the part number as it appears on the item or tag/packaging. In case of an engine or
propeller the type designation may be used.
Block 9 Quantity
If the item is required by regulation to be identified with a serial number, enter it here.
Additionally, any other serial number not required by regulation may also be entered. If there is
no serial number identified on the item, enter ―N/A‖.
Issue: July 2011 Page 79 of 100
CAR 145
Block 11 Status/Work
Entry Meaning
Overhauled Means a process that ensures the item is in complete conformity with the
applicable service tolerance specified in the type certificate holder‘s or
equipment manufacturer‘s instructions for continued airworthiness or in the
data which is approved or accepted by the GCAA. The item will be at least
disassembled, cleaned, inspected, repaired as necessary, reassembled and
tested in accordance with the above specified data.
Repaired Rectification of defect(s) using an applicable standards*
Inspected/Tested Examination, measurement, etc. in accordance with an applicable standard*
(e.g. by visual inspection, functional texsting, bench testing and operational
checks). The results shall bde described or referenced in Block 12
Modified Alteration of an item to conform to an applicable standards*
1. The production of a new item in conformity with the approved design data.
The box ―approved design data and are in a condition for safe operation‖ should be marked in
block 13a.
4. The examination of a previously released new item prior to entry into service:
When a new Certificate is issued to correct error(s) the following statement must be entered
in block 12:
If printing the data from an electronic AW Form 1 any data not appropriate in other blocks
should be entered in this block.
Block 12 Remarks
State any information in this block, either directly or by reference to supporting documentation,
necessary for the user or installer todetermine the airworthiness of the item in relation of the
works being certified. If necessary a saperate sheet may be used and referenced from the main
certificate. Each statement must be clearly identified as to which item in Block 6 it relates. If
there is no statement, state ‗None‘.
Not used for maintenance release. shade, darken, or othewrwise mark to preclude in adevertent
or unauthorized used.
1. Mark the ―approved design data and are in a condition for safe operation‖ box if the
item(s) were manufactured using approved design data and found to be in a condition for
safe operation.
2. Mark the ―non-approved design data specified in block 12‖ box if the item(s) were
manufactured using applicable non-approved design data. Identify the data in block 12 (e.g.,
pending type-certificate, for test only, pending approved data).
Mixtures of items released against approved and non-approved design data are not permitted on
the same Certificate.
This space shall be completed with the signature of the authorized person. Only persons
specifically authorized under the rules and policies of the Authority are permitted to sign this
block. To aid recognition, a unique number identifying the authorized person may be added.
Enter the name of the person signing block 13b in a legible form.
Block 14a-14e
Mark the box indicating which regulations apply to the completed work. If the other box ―other
regulation specified in block 12‖ is marked, then the regulations of the other airworthiness
authority(ies) must be identified in block 12. At lease one box must be marked, or both boxes
must be marked, as appropriate.If the other box ―other regulation in specified in block 12‖ is
marked, then the regulations of the other airworthiness authority(ies) must be identified in block
12. At lease one box must be marked, or both boxes m.
The space shall be completed with the signature of the authorized person. Only person
specifically authorized under the rules and policies of the GCAA are permitted to sign this block.
To aid recognition, a unique number identifying the authorized person may be added.
Enter the name of the person signing Block 14b in a legible form
User/Installer Responsibilities
Place the following statement on the Certificate to notify end users that they are not relieved of
their responsibilities concerning installation and use of any item accompanied by the form:
Statements in blocks 13a and 14a do not constitute installation certification. In all cases aircraft
maintenance records must contain an installation certification issued in accordance with the
national GCAA regulations by the user/installer before the aircraft may be flown.‖
APPENDIX II
to CAR 145
1. Except as stated otherwise for the smallest organization in paragraph 12, Table 1 outlines
the full extent of approval possible under CAR 145 in a standardized form. An organization
must be granted an approval ranging from a single class and rating with limitations to all
classes and ratings with limitations.
2. In addition to Table 1 the CAR 145 approved maintenance organization is required by CAR
145.20 to indicate scope of work in the maintenance organization exposition. See also
paragraph 11.
3. Within the approval class(es) and rating(s) granted by the Authority, the scope of work
specified in the maintenance organization exposition defines the exact limits of approval. It is
therefore essential that the approval class(es) and rating(s) and the organization's scope of
work are compatible.
4. A category A class rating means that the CAR 145 approved maintenance organization
may carry out maintenance on the aircraft and any component (including engines/APUs)
only whilst such components are fitted to the aircraft except that such components can be
temporarily removed for maintenance when such removal is expressly permitted by the
aircraft maintenance manual to improve access for maintenance subject to a control
procedure in the maintenance organization exposition. The limitation section will specify
the scope of such maintenance thereby indicating the extent of approval.
5. A category B class rating means that the CAR 145 approved maintenance organization
may carry out maintenance on the uninstalled engine/APU (‗Auxiliary Power Unit‘) and
engine/APU components only whilst such components are fitted to the engine/APU except
that such components can be temporarily removed for maintenance when such removal is
expressly permitted by the engine/APU manual to improve access for maintenance. The
limitation section will specify the scope of such maintenance thereby indicating the
extent of approval. A CAR 145 approved maintenance organization with a category B
class rating may also carry out maintenance on an installed engine during ‗base‘ and ‗line‘
maintenance subject to a control procedure in the maintenance organization exposition. The
maintenance organization exposition scope of work shall reflect such activity where
permitted by the Authority.
6. A category C class rating means that the CAR 145 approved maintenance organization
may carry out maintenance on uninstalled components (excluding engines and APUs)
intended for fitment to the aircraft or engine/APU. The limitation section will specify the
scope of such maintenance thereby indicating the extent of approval. A CAR 145
approved maintenance organization with a category C class rating may also carry out
maintenance on an installed component during base and line maintenance or at an
engine/APU maintenance facility subject to a control procedure in the maintenance
Issue: July 2011 Page 84 of 100
CAR 145
7. A category D class rating is a self contained class rating not necessarily related to a specific
aircraft, engine or other component. The D1 — Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) rating is
only necessary for a CAR 145 approved maintenance organization that carries out NDT as a
particular task for another organization. A CAR 145 approved maintenance organization
with a class rating in A or B or C category may carry out NDT on products it is
maintaining subject to the maintenance organization exposition containing NDT procedures,
without the need for a D1 class rating.
8. Category A class ratings are subdivided into ‗Base‘ or ‗Line‘ maintenance, a CAR 145
approved maintenance organization may be approved for either ‗Base‘ or ‗Line‘
maintenance or both. It should be noted that a ‗Line‘ facility located at a main base
facility requires a ‗Line‘ maintenance approval.
10. Table 1 makes reference to series, type and group in the limitation section of class A and B.
Series means a specific type series such as Airbus 300 or 310 or 319 or Boeing 737-300
series or RB211-524 series etc. Type means a specific type or model such as Airbus 310-240
type or RB 211-524 B4 type etc. Any number of series or types may be quoted. Group
means for example Cessna single piston engined aircraft or Lycoming non-supercharged
piston engines etc.
11. When a lengthy capability list is used which could be subject to frequent amendment,
then such amendment shall be in accordance with a procedure acceptable to the Authority
and included in the maintenance organization exposition. The procedure shall address the
issues of who is responsible for capability list amendment control and the actions that
need to be taken for amendment. Such actions include ensuring compliance with CAR 145
for products or services added to the list.
12. A CAR 145 approved maintenance organization which employs only one person to both
plan and carry out all maintenance can only hold a limited scope of approval rating.
The maximum permissible limits are:
It should be noted that such an organization may be further limited by the Authority in the
scope of approval dependent upon the capability of the particular organization.
Table 1
B1 Turbine Will state engine series or type and/or the maintenance task(s)
ENGINES
APPENDIX III
to CAR 145
1. Certifying staff in compliance with the following conditions will meet the intent of
145.30(j)(1) and (2):
(a) The person shall hold a license or a certifying staff authorization issued under the
country‘s National regulations in compliance with ICAO Annex 1.
(b) The scope of work of the person shall not exceed the scope of work defined by the
National license/certifying staff authorization.
(c) The person shall demonstrate he has received training on human factors and
airworthiness regulations as detailed in CAR 66.
(d) The person shall demonstrate five years maintenance experience for line maintenance
certifying staff and eight years for base maintenance certifying staff. However, those
persons whose authorized tasks do not exceed those of a CAR 66 category A certifying
staff, need to demonstrate three years maintenance experience only.
(e) Line maintenance certifying staff and base maintenance support staff shall receive type
training at a level corresponding to CAR 66 Appendix III level 3 for every aircraft on
which they are authorized to make certification. However those persons whose authorized
tasks do not exceed those of a CAR 66 category A certifying staff may receive task
training in lieu of complete type training.
(f) Base maintenance certifying staff must receive type training at a level corresponding to at
least CAR 66 Appendix III level 1 for every aircraft on which they are authorized to
make certification.
2. Protected rights
(a) 145.30(j) personnel before the entry into force of CAR 66 may continue to exercise their
privileges without the need to comply with paragraph 1(c) to 1(f).
(b) However after that date any certifying staff willing to extend the scope of their
authorization to include additional privileges shall comply with paragraph 1 above.
(c) Notwithstanding subparagraph 2(b) above, in the case of additional type training,
compliance with paragraph 1(c) and 1(d) is not required.
1. APPLICABILITY
(a) This Appendix prescribes requirements for the approval of a Maintenance Organization
Certificate to include approval of suppliers of aeronautical components, assemblies and
items of equipment that have been manufactured, inspected and tested in conformity with
acceptable specifications/standards and to GCAA satisfaction.
(b) Approval of suppliers as outlined above does not necessarily have to be made a part of
Maintenance Organization approval and can be realized separately.
2. ELIGIBILITY
The GCAA will only accept an application for the inclusion of a supplier of aeronautical
components to the maintenance organization certificate of approval if:
(a) all aeronautical parts/components/products are procured directly from the manufacturer by
the Organization, or from an agent who is duly approved by the State of manufacture of the
parts and/or the manufacturer itself. In case the agent is located in the territory of United
Arab Emirates, the distributor shall obtain the approval from the GCAA;
(b) the organization shall, in the opinion of the GCAA, be capable of handling this activity;
(c) the qualifications and experience of the organization staff shall be adequate to conduct the
work involved;
(d) the organization is equipped with the necessary means to determine the origin as well as the
authenticity of the aeronautical products or components distributed by the suppliers;
(e) adequate methods for record keeping of all aeronautical products and component exist;
(g) details of compliance requirements are listed Airworthiness Notice No. 22.
3.1 The application shall be made in a form and in a manner prescribed in this chapter.
3.2 Among other maintenance capabilities, suppliers‘ approval can be added to the application
form.
3.3 The application shall include a brief description of the type of aeronautical products and
components that will be handled by the organization.
3.4 The exposition document of the maintenance organization should include a section
explaining the relevant procedures for handling the aeronautical product suppliers‘ activities.
3.5 The GCAA will review the application as well as the submitted technical documents and,
if acceptable, terms of approval shall be issued as part of the maintenance approval
certificate. The certificate will show, among the other maintenance capabilities,
aeronautical products suppliers‘ approval.
3.6 Required fees for a maintenance organization approval certificate with aeronautical
product suppliers‘ capability will be collected by the GCAA before the issuance of the
certificate.
4. PRIVILEGES
4.1 The holder of the GCAA supplier certificates will be authorized to use the privileges of
his certificate within the UAE and he will have the right to advertise and solicit customers
to supply airworthy aeronautical products and components.
APPENDICES TO
APPENDIX I
to AMC
APPENDIX II
to AMC
RESERVED
APPENDIX III
to AMC
APPENDIX IV
to AMC 145.30(e)
This appendix includes general instructions for providing training on Fuel Tank Safety issues.
A) Effectivity
B) Affected organisations
Phase 1 only:
Phase 1 – Awareness
The training should be carried out before the person starts to work without supervision but not
later than 6 months after joining the organisation.
Type: Should be an awareness course with the principal elements of the subject. It may take the
form of a training bulletin, or other self study or informative session. Signature of the reader is
required to ensure that the person has passed the training.
Level: It should be a course at the level of familiarisation with the principal elements of the
subject.
Objectives:
1. Be familiar with the basic elements of the fuel tank safety issues.
2. Be able to give a simple description of the historical background and the elements
requiring a safety consideration, using common words and showing examples of non
conformities.
3. Be able to use typical terms.
The persons who have already attended the Level 2 Detailed training course from a CAR145
maintenance organisation or from a CAR147 training organisation are already in compliance
with Phase 2 with the exception of continuation training.
Staff should have received Phase 2 training by January 2012 or within 12 months of joining the
organization, whichever comes later.
Type: Should be a more in-depth internal or external course. It should not take the form of a
training bulletin, or other self study. An examination should be required at the end, which should
be in the form of a multi choice question, and the pass mark of the examination should be 75%.
Level: It should be a detailed course on the theoretical and practical elements of the subject.
A continuous evaluation process should ensure the effectiveness of the training and its
relevance;
Some questions at intermediate steps of the training should be proposed to ensure that the
trainee is authorized to move to the next step;
The content and results of examinations should be recorded;
Access to an instructor in person or at distance should be possible in case support is
needed.
When the course is provided in a classroom, the instructor should be very familiar with the data
in Objectives and Guidelines. To be familiar, an instructor should have attended himself a similar
course in a classroom and made additionally some lecture of related subjects.
Objectives:
- Have knowledge of the history of events related to fuel tank safety issues and the theoretical
and practical elements of the subject, have an overview of the FAA regulations known as
SFAR (Special FAR) 88 of the FAA and of JAA Temporary Guidance Leaflet TGL 47, be
able to give a detailed description of the concept of fuel tank system ALI (including Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations CDCCL, and using theoretical fundamentals and
specific examples;
- Have the capacity to combine and apply the separate elements of knowledge in a logical and
comprehensive manner;
- Be able to identify the components or parts or the aircraft subject to FTS from the
manufacturer‘s documentation,
- Be able to plan the action or apply a Service Bulletin and an Airworthiness Directive.
Continuation training
The organisation should ensure that the continuation training is required in each two years
period. The syllabus of the training programme referred to in 3.4 of the Maintenance
Organisation Exposition (MOE) should include the additional syllabus for this continuation
training.
The continuation training may be combined with the phase 2 training in a classroom or at
distance.
The continuing training should be updated when new instruction are issued which are related to
the material, tools, documentation and manufacturer‘s or authority‘s directives.
The following guidelines should be taken into consideration when the phase 2 training
programme are being established:
(a) understanding of the background and the concept of fuel tank safety,
(b) how the mechanics can recognise, interpret and handle the improvements in the
instruction for continuing airworthiness that have been made or are being made regarding
the fuel tank system maintenance,
(c) awareness of any hazards especially when working on the fuel system, and when the
Flammability Reduction System using nitrogen is installed.
Paragraphs a) b) and c) above should be introduced in the training programme addressing the
following issues:
i. The theoretical background behind the risk of fuel tank safety: the explosions of
mixtures of fuel and air, the behaviour of those mixtures in an aviation environment,
the effects of temperature and pressure, energy needed for ignition etc, the ‗fire
triangle‘, Explain 2 concepts to prevent explosions:
ii. The major accidents related to fuel tank systems, the accident investigations and their
conclusions,
iii. SFAR 88 of the FAA and JAA Interim Policy INT POL 25/12: ignition prevention
program initiatives and goals, to identify unsafe conditions and to correct them, to
systematically improve fuel tank maintenance),
iv. Explain briefly the concepts that are being used: the results of SFAR 88 of the FAA
and JAA INT/POL 25/12: modifications, airworthiness limitations items and
CDCCL,
v. Where relevant information can be found and how to use and interpret this
information in the instructions for continuing airworthiness (aircraft maintenance
manuals, component maintenance manuals, Service Bulletins…)
vi. Fuel Tank Safety during maintenance: fuel tank entry and exit procedures, clean
working environment, what is meant by configuration control, wire separation,
bonding of components etc,
vii. Flammability reduction systems when installed: reason for their presence, their
effects, the hazards of an FRS using nitrogen for maintenance, safety precautions in
maintenance/working with an FRS,
The training should include a representative number of examples of defects and the associated
repairs as required by the TC/STC holders maintenance data.
F) Approval of training
For CAR145 approved organisations, the approval of the initial and continuation training
programme and the content of the examination can be achieved by the change to the MOE
exposition. The necessary changes to the MOE to meet the content of this decision should be
made and implemented at the time requested by the GCAA.