Governing Equations of Fluid Dynamics AND An Aerodynamic Application: "Coanda Effect"
Governing Equations of Fluid Dynamics AND An Aerodynamic Application: "Coanda Effect"
DYNAMICS
AND
AN AERODYNAMIC APPLICATION:
“COANDA EFFECT”
1.1 Introduction
We are all familiar with fluids and we have all been fascinated at some time by fluid
behavior: pouring, flowing, splashing and so on. At some level we have all built an intuitive
understanding on how fluids behave.
Understanding fluid dynamics has been one of the major advances of physics, applied
mathematics and engineering over the last hundred years. Starting with the explanations of
aerofoil theory (i.e., why aircraft wings work), the study of fluids continues today with
looking at how internal and surface waves, shock waves, turbulent fluid flow and the
occurrence of chaos can be described mathematically. At the same time, it is important to
realize how much of engineering depends on a proper understanding of fluids: from flow of
water through pipes, to studying effluent discharge into the sea; from motions of the
atmosphere, to the flow of lubricants in a car engine.
Fluid dynamics is also the key to our understanding of some of the most important
phenomena in our physical world: ocean currents and weather systems, convection currents such as
the motions of molten rock inside the Earth and the motions in the outer layers of the Sun, the
explosions of supernovae and the swirling of gases in galaxies.
Like many fascinating subjects, understanding is not always easy. In particular, for
fluid dynamics there are many terms and mathematical methods which will probably be
unfamiliar. Although the basic concepts of velocity, mass, linear momentum, forces, etc., are the
building blocks, the slippery nature of fluids means that applying those basic concepts sometimes
takes some work.
Fluids can fascinate us exactly because they sometimes do unexpected things, which means
we have to work harder at their mathematical explanation.
There are basically two ways of deriving the equations which governs the motion of a
fluid. One of these methods approaches the question from the molecular point of view. The
alternative method which is used to derive the equations which govern the motion of a fluid
uses the continuum concept.
The continuity assumption considers fluids to be continuos. That is, properties such as
density, pressure, temperature, and velocity are taken to be well-defined at infinitely small
points, and are assumed to vary continuously from one point to another. The discrete,
molecular nature of a fluid is ignored.
Those problems for which the continuity assumption does not give answers of desired
accuracy are solved using statistical mechanics. In order to determine whether to use
conventional fluid dynamics (a subdiscipline of continuum mechanics) or statistical
mechanics, the Knudsen number:
where
T, temperature (K)
kB, Boltzmann's constant
P, total pressure (Pa)
is evaluated for the problem. Problems with Knudsen numbers at or above unity must be
evaluated using statistical mechanics for reliable solutions.
The vast majority of phenomena encoutered in fluid mechanics fall well within
the continuum domain and may involve liquids as well as gases. The continuum method is
generaly used to describe fluid dynamics.
When it comes to deducing the equations that govern fluid motion, there are two
fundamentally different approaches: the Eulerian description and the Lagrangian
description. The two viewpoints have been named in honor of the Swiss mathematician
Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) and the French mathematician and mathematical physicist
Joseph-Louis Lagrange (1736-1813), respectively.
The method used to derive the basic equations of motion from the conservation
laws is to use the continuum concept and to follow an arbitrarily shaped control volume in a
lagrangian frame of reference. The combination of the arbitrary control volume and the
lagrangian coordinate system means that material derivative of volume integrals will be
encountered. Though it is necessary to transform such terms into equivalent expressions
involving volume integrals of eulerian derivatives. The theorem which permits such
transformation is called Reynolds’ transport theorem.
D �
� �
Dt � �
dV = + ѷ ( u ) dV
V ��t �
V
� �
It is conventional in fluid mechanics to use D instead of d in time derivatives if it is the
derivative of a Lagrangian quantity.
Having established the method to be used to derive the basic conservation
equations it remains actually to invoke the various conservation principles.
Constitutive equations are relating the stresses in the fluid to the deformation
history.
Consider a specific mass of fluid whose volume V is arbitrarily chosen. If this given
mass is followed as it flows, its size and shape will be observed to change but the mass will
remain unchanged. This is the principle of mass conservation which applies to fluids in
which no nuclear reactions are taking place.
The equation which express conservation of mass is:
r �
�
+ ( r uk ) = 0
�t �xk
The above equation express more than the fact that mass is conserved. Since it is a
partial differential equation, the implication is that the velocity is continuous. For this reason
is usually called the continuity equation.
In many practical cases of fluid flow the variation of density of the fluid may be
ignored, for example in most cases of the flow of liquids. In such cases the fluid is said to be
incompressible, which means that as a given mass of fluid is followed, not only will its mass
be observed to remain constant but it’s volume and hence its density.
Mathematically this special simplification of the continuity equation can be written
as:
Dr r
� �
uk
=0 or +r =0
Dt �t �xk
Equation of continuity, either in the general form or the incompressible form is the
first condition which has to be satisfied by the velocity and the density of the fluid.
d
� r uidV + �r ui �dA = �s ijdAj + �fidV
dt V �V �V V
The basic conservation laws discussed in the previous section represent five scalar
equations which the fluid properties must satisfy as the fluid flows. The continuity and the
energy equation are scalar equations while the momentum equation is a vector which
represents three scalar equations. But our basic conservation laws have introduced seventeen
unknowns: the scalars r and e, the density and internal energy respectively, the vectors uj and
qj, the velocity and heat flux respectively, each vector having three components and the stress
tensor sij, which has in general nine independent components.
In order to obtain a complete set of equations the stress tensor sij and the heat-flux
vector qj must be further specified. This leads to so-called “constitutive equations” in which
the stress tensor is related to the deformation tensor and the heat-flux vector is related to the
temperature gradients.
In order to achieve this end the postulates for a newtonian fluid are used. It should
pointed out that some fluid do not behave in a newtonian manner and their special
characteristic are among the topics of current research. One example is the class of fluids
called viscoelastic fluids whose properties may be used to reduce the drag of a body.
The stress tensor is supposed to satisfy the following condition: when the fluid is
at rest the stress is hydrostatic and the pressure exerted by the fluid is the thermodynamic
pressure.
The above figure represents stress acting on a small cube, where ij are the
components of the shear-stress tensor which depends upon the motion of the fluid only.
Using that condition the constitutive relation for stress in a newtonian fluid
becomes:
�
uk ��
uj �ui �
s ij = - pd ij + ld ij +m� + �
�xk ��xi �
xj �
The nine elements of the stress tensor have now been expressed in terms of the
pressure and the velocity gradients and two coefficients l and m. These coefficients cannot be
determined analytically and must be determined empirically. They are the viscosity
coefficients of the fluid.
The second constitutive relation is Fourier’s Law for heat conduction:
�
T
qj = - k
�
xj
where qj is the heat-flux vector, k is the thermal conductivity of the fluid and T is the
temperature.
1.4.5 Navier-Stokes Equations
The equation of momentum conservation together with the constitutive relation for a
Newtonian fluid yield the famous Navier-Stokes equations, which are the principal
conditions to be satisfied by a fluid as it flows:
������涶
uj uj p � uk � � ui uj ��
r + r uk =- + l
� �+ m
� + �+ r f
�
�t �
xk �
xj � xj � �
xk � �xi � �
��xj �
x i �
�
The Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible fluid of constant density is:
�
uj �uj �p �2uj
r + r uk =- + m 2 + r fi
�t �
xk �
xj �xi
In the special case of negligible viscous effects, Navier-Stokes equations become:
�
uj �
uj �p
r + r uk =- + r fi
�t �
xk �
xj
known as Euler equations.
1.4.6 In conclusion
For an inviscid fluid in which any body forces are conservative and either the flow is
steady or it is irrotational the equations of momentum conservation may be integrated to
yield a single scalar equation which is called the Bernoulli equation:
dp 1
� + u�u - G = constant along each streamline
r 2
This result is referred to as the Bernoulli integral or the Bernoulli equation. It should be
recalled that is valid only for the steady flow of a fluid in which viscous effects are negligible
and in which any body forces are conservative.
"That we have written an equation does not remove from the flow of fluids its charm
or mystery or its surprise." --Richard Feynman [1964]
Coanda effect was used by Jeff Raskin to explain how a wing generate lift and drag.
Henri Coanda attended high-school in Bucharest and in Iasi. After this he joined the
Bucharest Military School where he graduated as an artillery officer. Fond of technical
problems, especially of flight technics, in 1905 he built a 'missile-airplane' in Bucharest for
the Army. Then he went up to Berlin to attend studies at Technische Hochschule in
Charlottenburg, after which he followed with studies at the Science University in Liege, part
of the Electrical Institute in Montefiore. He registered at the Superior Aeronautical School in
Paris where he graduated in 1909.
The most known, studied, and applied discovery of Henri Coanda is the 'Coanda Effect'.
Henri stated that the first time he realized something about what would become known as the
Coanda Effect was while he was testing what he termed was his reactive airplane, Coanda-
1910. After the plane took off, Coanda observed that the flames and burned gases exhausted
from the engine tended to remain very close to the fuselage. For a long time this phenomenon
of the burned gases and flames hugging the fuselage remained a great mystery which he
explored by exchanging opinions with specialists in aerodynamics around the world. After
studies which lasted more than 20 years, (carried out by Coanda and other scientists) it was
recognized as a new aeronautical effect. Prof. Albert Metral named the phenomenon for
Coanda.
In 1970, Coanda returned to Romania and settled for the last years of his life in Bucharest. In
1971, he and Prof. Elie Carafoli reorganized the Aeronaurical Engineering discipline at
Bucharest Polytechnic Institute, splitting the Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering
Department into two departments of study -- Mechanical Engineering and Aircraft
Engineering.