spgp536 PDF
spgp536 PDF
Summary
The Ravva Field is a mature oil field in the shallow offshore KG Basin, Andhra Pradesh, which has been
producing from Middle Miocene reservoirs since 1993. Pressure support by water injection was provided in the early
stages of production life (1997). Water injection sustained a plateau production of 50000 bopd for ~ 9 years. The field is
currently on decline with increasing water cut. Reservoir simulation and history matching data suggest additional recovery
from the unswept zones in the crestal part of the structure are present, together with by-passed zones of commercial
value contained within the assumed swept zone up-dip of the original oil-water contact (OWC). A feasibility study was
carried out to model the expected seismic response resulting from oil production and water injection between 2000 and
2010. From the modeling it is estimated that an acoustic impedance change of 3 – 12% in the reservoir occurs due to
saturation changes and expansion of solution gas. This is observed to be sufficient to map the advancing water front in
the reservoir sands. An OBC survey was acquired in 2000 (the Base survey) with a Monitor survey being
subsequently acquired in 2010. Base and Monitor data sets were processed in a 4D sense to map time lapse seismic
effects caused by production and water injection. Initial 4D interpretation studies reveal areas of reservoir sweep,
potential unswept areas and probable intra-reservoir heterogeneities. Hydrocarbon saturations were confirmed at the
crestal part of the structure. An infill drilling campaign was executed during 2010 -11 and the drilling results are in line
with 4D interpretations. Several potential unswept areas have been identified in the Ravva Field and further work is on-
going to assess their value. 4D seismic has provided key data which is being used to optimize well plac ement
and generate additional value by way of extracting increased recovery from this mature field.
Keywords: 4D seismic, Acoustic Impedance changes (AIC), Water injection (WI), Reservoir modeling, unswept areas,
oil water contacts (OWC), Base and Monitor surveys, by-pass zones.
2
Conclusions
Figure 2: Synthetic seismic amplitudes from the feasibility study. Figures on the left show the modeled seismic amplitudes at the production period
2003 (T1) & 2005 (T2). Figures on the right show the seismic amplitudes between 2000 (T0) & 2003 (T1) and 2000 (T0) & 2005 (T2). 4D signal is
observed at both T1 & T2 time-stamps with increasing production (shown in ellipse).
3
Figure 3: Far angle mimimum amplitude attribute showing the movement of OWC between 2000 & 2010. Areas marked in circle shows
the undrained areas in the crestal part of the structure.
Figure 4: Far angle mimimum amplitude attribute showing the movement of injected water (white arrows) in REFB block. Area
marked in black circle shows the undrained areas which were proved by drilling..
References Acknowledgements
Ghosh, B., K. N. Raju, S. S. Pandian, N. Krishnaiah, 2007, The authors gratefully acknowledge the full support of the
Time- Lapse Seismic (4D) Feasibility Study in Ravva Ravva Field Joint Venture partners Oil and Natural Gas
Field, Seventh International Petroleum Conference Corporation, Videocon limited and Ravva Singapore in the
PETROTECH, India planning and execution of the 4D studies and for their
permission to publish this work.