Scribd
Upload
66 views1 page

Laguna Catv Network, Inc. vs. Maraan G.R. NO. 139492, NOVEMBER 19, 2002

Several employees filed complaints against Laguna CATV Network for unpaid wages and benefits. The DOLE regional director ordered Laguna to pay after an investigation and issued a writ of execution when Laguna did not comply. Laguna filed a motion to quash and a motion for extension with the Court of Appeals instead of appealing to the Secretary of Labor first. The Court of Appeals denied the motion, finding that Laguna failed to exhaust administrative remedies by skipping the appeal to the Secretary of Labor. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Laguna should have appealed to the Secretary of Labor as required before going to the Court of Appeals.

Uploaded by

Aldrin Barallas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
66 views1 page

Laguna Catv Network, Inc. vs. Maraan G.R. NO. 139492, NOVEMBER 19, 2002

Several employees filed complaints against Laguna CATV Network for unpaid wages and benefits. The DOLE regional director ordered Laguna to pay after an investigation and issued a writ of execution when Laguna did not comply. Laguna filed a motion to quash and a motion for extension with the Court of Appeals instead of appealing to the Secretary of Labor first. The Court of Appeals denied the motion, finding that Laguna failed to exhaust administrative remedies by skipping the appeal to the Secretary of Labor. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Laguna should have appealed to the Secretary of Labor as required before going to the Court of Appeals.

Uploaded by

Aldrin Barallas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

LAGUNA CATV NETWORK, INC. VS.

MARAAN
G.R. NO. 139492, NOVEMBER 19, 2002

FACTS:

Private respondents filed with the Department of Labor and Employment,


Regional Office No. IV (DOLE Region IV), separate complaints for underpayment of
wages and non-payment of other employee benefits against their employer, Laguna
CATV Network, Inc., petitioner herein.

DOLE Regional Director Maraan, after a summary investigation, issued an Order


directing petitioner to pay the concerned employees their unpaid claims. Petitioner filed
a motion for reconsideration. Petitioner failed to comply with said Order so DOLE
Regional Director issued a writ of execution. Petitioner filed a motion to quash but the
same was denied.

Instead of appealing to the Secretary of Labor, petitioner filed with the Court of
Appeals a motion for extension of time to file a petition for review. Petitioner was of the
view that an appeal to the Secretary of Labor ‘would be an exercise in futility
considering that the said appeal will be filed with the Regional Office and it will surely be
disapproved.’ The Court of Appeals denied said motion ruling, among others, that
petitioner failed to exhaust administrative remedies.

ISSUE:

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in denying its motion for extension and in
dismissing the case on the ground that petitioner failed to exhaust administrative
remedies.

RULING:

No. The Court of Appeals was correct in holding that petitioner failed to exhaust
all administrative remedies.
As provided under Article 128 of the Labor Code, as amended, an order issued
by the duly authorized representative of the Secretary of Labor may be appealed to the
latter. Thus, petitioner should have first appealed to the Secretary of Labor instead of
filing with the Court of Appeals a motion for extension of time to file a petition for review.

You might also like