Scribd
Upload
163 views5 pages

Law of Torts Course Overview

The document provides an overview of the Law of Torts, Consumer Protection and Motor Vehicle Act course. It discusses key topics that will be covered, including the nature and evolution of tort law in India, general defenses, vicarious liability, specific torts like negligence and defamation, consumer protection laws, and the Motor Vehicles Act. The course will employ various pedagogical methods like class discussions, presentations and case studies. Students will be evaluated based on projects, seminars, assignments and an end-semester exam.

Uploaded by

Vikas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
163 views5 pages

Law of Torts Course Overview

The document provides an overview of the Law of Torts, Consumer Protection and Motor Vehicle Act course. It discusses key topics that will be covered, including the nature and evolution of tort law in India, general defenses, vicarious liability, specific torts like negligence and defamation, consumer protection laws, and the Motor Vehicles Act. The course will employ various pedagogical methods like class discussions, presentations and case studies. Students will be evaluated based on projects, seminars, assignments and an end-semester exam.

Uploaded by

Vikas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

BA.LL.B & BSc.LL.

B LAW OF TORTS, CONSUMER L T P C


(102) PROTECTION AND MOTOR VEHICLE
ACT
Version1.1 4 0 0 4
Pre-requisites//Exposure
co-requisites

Course Description

The Law of Torts is primarily concerned with redressal of wrongful civil actions
by awarding compensation. In a society where men live together, conflicts of
interests are bound to occur and they may from time to time cause damage to one
or the other. In addition, with the rapid industrialization, tortious liability has come
to be applied against manufacturers and industrial units. The Law of Torts had
originated from Common Law and by and large this branch of law continues to be
uncodified. Tortious liability has been codified only to a very limited extent such
as workmen’s compensation, motor vehicle accidents, consumer protection and
many more.
As the Law of Torts is basically a judge made law, students are required to study it
in the light of judicial pronouncements. They are required to equip themselves with
the latest developments extending to the entire course. Keeping in mind all these
aspects, the syllabus has been framed and it will surely fulfill the changing legal
perspective in the post liberalized era.
Pedagogy
A various learning methods will be used which will emphasize a cooperative learning format.
Student led discussions and presentations will be combined with instructor facilitated
experiences and lectures. Specific methods include:

 Class Room Discussion


 Teaching Assignment
 Presentations
 Case Studies
 Projects
 Seminar
 Panel Discussion
Evaluation Scheme:

Sl. Components Weightage


No. (Max. Marks)
1 Project Submission 20
2 Project Presentation 10
3 Seminar 10
4. Teaching Assignment 10
5. Semester End Examination 50
6 Total 100

COURSE OUTLINE

Module 1: Introduction

 Nature, Definition and Evolution of Law of Torts


 Reasons for slow development of Law of Torts in India
 Law of Tort or Law of Torts
 Ubi Remedium Ibi Jus- Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium
 Injuria sine Damno- Damnum sine Injuria
 Tort, Contract, Crime and Breach of Trust distinguished
 Mental Element and Causation in Torts

Readings Material:

 Winfield & Jolowicz on Torts, Sweet & Maxwell (2002)


 WVH Rogers, Winfield & Jolowicz on Torts (Sweet & Maxwell 2002) 16th Ed
 Ratanlal & Dhirajlal, The Law of Torts, Revised by G.P. Singh (Wadhwa and Co.
Nagpur, 2004) p. (1-21)
 Clerk and Lindsell, Clerk and Lindsell on Torts, Margaret R. Brazier, Daniel Alexander
(ed.), (Sweet & Maxwell, 17th Ed., 19995) p. (1-01 – 1-56)

Cases:

 Ashby v. White (1703) 2 Ld. Raym. 938


 Rookes v. Barnard (1964) AC 1027
 White v. John Warwick & Co. Ltd. (1953) 2 WLR 1285
 Acton v. Blundell (1843) 12 M & W 324
 The Municipal Board of Agra v. Asharfial AIR 1922 All 1
 Dr. Mohammed v. Dr. Mehfooz Ali 1991 MPLJ 559
 Haynes v. Harwood (1935) 1 KB 146

Module 2: General Defenses

 Volenti non fit injuria


 Inevitable accident
 Private defense
 Necessity
 Statutory Authority
 Plaintiff’s Default
 Vis Major
Reading Material:

 Winfield & Jolowicz on Torts, Sweet & Maxwell (2002)

 W.V.H Rogers, Winfield & Jolowicz on Torts (Sweet & Maxwell Publication, London, 2002) p.
(845 - 877)
 Ratanlal and Dhirajlal, The Law of Torts, Revised by G.P Singh (Wadhwa and
 Co. Nagpur, 2004) p. (1-21)
 Clerk and Lindsel, Clerk and Lindsell on Torts, Margaret R. Brazier, Daniel Alexander(ed.),
(Sweet & Maxwell, 17th edn., 1995) p. (3-01 – 3-57)
Cases:
 Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club (1932) 1 KB 205
 Smith v. Baker and Sons (1891) AC 325
 South Indian Industrial Ltd. Madras v. Alamulu Anmal (1923) MWN 344
 Haynes v. Harwood (1935) 1 KB 146
 Ramchand Ram Nagaram Rice & Oil Mills Ltd. v. Municipal Commissioner of Purilla
Municipality (1943) ILR 22 Pat 359
 Gillick v. West Norfolk & Wiseback Area Health Authority (1985) 3 All E R 402

Module 3: Vicarious Liability, Strict and Absolute Liability

 Qui Facit Per Alium Facit Per Se


 Master and Servant
 Independent Contractor
 Vicarious Liability of State
 Rule in Rylands v. Fletcher – evolution and other aspects for understanding
 Rule in M C Mehta v. Union of India – evolution and other aspects for understanding
Difference between Absolute and Strict Liability
Cases:

 Lloyd v. Grace Smith & Co. (1912) AC 716


 State Bank of India v. Shyama Devi AIR 1978 SC 1263
 State Bank of Rajasthan v. Vidyawati AIR 1962 SC 933
 Kasturilal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of UP AIR 1965 SC 1039
 N Nagendra Rao & Co. v. State of A.P. AIR 1994 SC 2663
 Chairman Railway Road v. Chandrina Das AIR 2000 SC 988
 Peninsular and Oriental Navigation Company v. Secretary of State for India (1861) 5
Bom. HCR App. 1, p. 1
 Mersery Docks and Harbour Board v. Coggins & Griffith (Liverpool) Ltd. (1947) AC 1,
17
 Lister v. Hesley Hall (1856) 1 D & B 118
 Tarry v. Ashton (1876) 1 QBD 314
 M C Mehta v. Union of India (Olium Oil Case) AIR 1978 SC 1086
 UCC v. Union of India (Bhopal Gas Leak) AIR 1990 SC 273Nemi Chand v. Wallace (1907)
ILR 34 Cal.
 Tushar Kanthi Ghosh v. Bina Bhowmick (1952) 57 CWN 3778
 R K Karanjia v. K M D Thakersey AIR 1970 Bom 424

Module 4: Specific Torts

 Negligence

 Nervous Shock

 Product Liability
 Defamation

 Trespass
 Nuisance

Cases:
 Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932) AC 562
 Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Sushil Devi AIR 1999 SC 1929
 Association of Victims of Upahar Tragedy v. Union of India 86 (2000) DLT 246
 Lucknow Development Authority v. M K Gupta AIR 1994 SC 787
 Indian Medical Association v. V P Shantha AIR 1996 SC 550
 Nemi Chand v. Wallace (1907) ILR 34 Cal.
 Tushar Kanthi Ghosh v. Bina Bhowmick (1952) 57 CWN 3778
 R K Karanjia v. K M D Thakersey AIR 1970 Bom 424

Module 5: Consumer Protection Act, 1986

 Objective and the Legislative History


 Nature of Liability
 Key Concepts- Consumer, Goods, Services, Unfair Trade Practice Restrictive Trade
Practice Defect and Deficiencies
 Protection of Consumer Interest before enactment of Consumer Protection Act, 1986;
 Consumer interest under Law of Torts
 Consumer interest under Law of Contract
 Consumer interest and Criminal Law
 Medical Negligence
 Real Estate Buyer Protection
 Consumer Protection Councils and Dispute Redressal Machineries

Reading Material:

 SK Verma and M Afzal Wani - A Treatise on Consumer Protection Laws, Indian Law
Institute 2004.
 Krishnamurthi S – Consumer and Law-Redressal of Grievances (Vinoc Law
Publications, Lucknow, 2002)
 Avtar Singh, Law Relating to Consumer Protection (Eastern Book Co, 2005)
 DN Saraf – Law of Consumer Protection in India’, Tripath, Bombay (1990)

Cases:
 Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) ac 562
 Dr Laxman Balakrishna Joshi v Dr Trimbak Bapu Godbole AIR 1969 SC 128
 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) 1 QB 256
 While v John Warrick and Co Ltd (1953) 1 WLR 1285
 Indian Medical Association v VP Santha AIR 1996 SC 550
 M/s India Photographic Co Ltd v HD shourie AIR 1999 SC 2453

Module-6: Motor Vehicles Act 1988 and Motor vehicle (Amendment) Act 2012

 Objectives and legislative history,

 Definitions;

 licensing of drivers of Motor Vehicles:

 Necessity for driving license;

 Age limit in connection with motor vehicles;

 Responsibilities of the owners of Motor Vehicles for contravention of Section 3 &4;

 Restriction on holding of driving licenses ;

 Grant of driving license;

 Renewal, Revocation and Suspension of driving license;

You might also like