Sets
Sets
Select Language▼
Introduction to Sets
Instead of math with numbers, we will now think about math with "things".
Definition
First we specify a common property among "things" (we define this word later) and then we gather up
all the "things" that have this common property.
set of clothes
For example, the items you wear: hat, shirt, jacket, pants, and so on.
set of fingers
So it is just things grouped together with a certain property in common.
Notation
There is a fairly simple notation for sets. We simply list each element (or "member") separated by a
comma, and then put some curly brackets around the whole thing:
Set Notation
Notice how the first example has the "..." (three dots together).
The three dots ... are called an ellipsis, and mean "continue on".
(OK, there isn't really an infinite amount of things you could wear, but I'm not entirely sure about that!
After an hour of thinking of different things, I'm still not sure. So let's just say it is infinite for this
example.)
So:
The first set {socks, shoes, watches, shirts, ...} we call an infinite set,
the second set {index, middle, ring, pinky} we call a finite set.
But sometimes the "..." can be used in the middle to save writing long lists:
{a, b, c, ..., x, y, z}
Numerical Sets
So what does this have to do with mathematics? When we define a set, all we have to specify is a
common characteristic. Who says we can't do so with numbers?
And the list goes on. We can come up with all different types of sets.
There can also be sets of numbers that have no common property, they are just defined that way. For
example:
Sets are the fundamental property of mathematics. Now as a word of warning, sets, by themselves,
seem pretty pointless. But it's only when we apply sets in different situations do they become the
powerful building block of mathematics that they are.
Math can get amazingly complicated quite fast. Graph Theory, Abstract Algebra, Real Analysis, Complex
Analysis, Linear Algebra, Number Theory, and the list goes on. But there is one thing that all of these
share in common: Sets.
Universal Set
star
We call this the universal set. It's a set that contains everything. Well, not exactly everything. Everything
that is relevant to our question.
various integers
In Number Theory the universal set is all the integers, as Number Theory is simply the study of integers.
various reals
But in Calculus (also known as real analysis), the universal set is almost always the real numbers.
various complex numbers And in complex analysis, you guessed it, the universal set is the
complex numbers.
So for example, A is a set, and a is an element in A. Same with B and b, and C and c.
Now you don't have to listen to the standard, you can use something like m to represent a set without
breaking any mathematical laws (watch out, you can get π years in math jail for dividing by 0), but this
notation is pretty nice and easy to follow, so why not?
Also, when we say an element a is in a set A, we use the symbol element symbol to show it.
Example: Set A is {1,2,3}. We can see that 1 element symbol A, but 5 not element symbol A
Equality
Two sets are equal if they have precisely the same members. Now, at first glance they may not seem
equal, so we may have to examine them closely!
A is the set whose members are the first four positive whole numbers
B = {4, 2, 1, 3}
Let's check. They both contain 1. They both contain 2. And 3, And 4. And we have checked every element
of both sets, so: Yes, they are equal!
A=B
Example: Are these sets equal?
A is {1, 2, 3}
B is {3, 1, 2}
subset
Subsets
When we define a set, if we take pieces of that set, we can form what is called a subset.
A subset of this is {1, 2, 3}. Another subset is {3, 4} or even another is {1}, etc.
But {1, 6} is not a subset, since it has an element (6) which is not in the parent set.
In general:
3 is in A and 3 is also in B.
4 is in A, and 4 is in B.
That's all the elements of A, and every single one is in B, so we're done.
Yes, A is a subset of B
Note that 2 is in B, but 2 is not in A. But remember, that doesn't matter, we only look at the elements in
A.
Well, we can't check every element in these sets, because they have an infinite number of elements. So
we need to get an idea of what the elements look like in each, and then compare them.
By pairing off members of the two sets, we can see that every member of A is also a member of B, but
not every member of B is a member of A:
pairing off A and B
So:
Proper Subsets
If we look at the defintion of subsets and let our mind wander a bit, we come to a weird conclusion.
This doesn't seem very proper, does it? We want our subsets to be proper. So we introduce (what else
but) proper subsets.
A is a proper subset of B if and only if every element in A is also in B, and there exists at least one
element in B that is not in A.
This little piece at the end is only there to make sure that A is not a proper subset of itself. Otherwise, a
proper subset is exactly the same as a normal subset.
Example:
{1, 2, 3} is a subset of {1, 2, 3}, but is not a proper subset of {1, 2, 3}.
Example:
{1, 2, 3} is a proper subset of {1, 2, 3, 4} because the element 4 is not in the first set.
Or we can say that A is not a subset of B by A not subset symbol B ("A is not a subset of B")
When we talk about proper subsets, we take out the line underneath and so it becomes A proper subset
symbol B or if we want to say the opposite, A not proper subset symbol B.
keys on guitar
Some other examples of the empty set are the set of countries south of the south pole.
So what's so weird about the empty set? Well, that part comes next.
So let's go back to our definition of subsets. We have a set A. We won't define it any more than that, it
could be any set. Is the empty set a subset of A?
Going back to our definition of subsets, if every element in the empty set is also in A, then the empty set
is a subset of A. But what if we have no elements?
It takes an introduction to logic to understand this, but this statement is one that is "vacuously" or
"trivially" true.
A good way to think about it is: we can't find any elements in the empty set that aren't in A, so it must be
that all elements in the empty set are in A.
The empty set is a subset of every set, including the empty set itself.
Order
No, not the order of the elements. In sets it does not matter what order the elements are in.
A finite set has finite order (or cardinality). An infinite set has infinite order (or cardinality).
For finite sets the order (or cardinality) is the number of elements.
For infinite sets, all we can say is that the order is infinite. Oddly enough, we can say with sets that some
infinities are larger than others, but this is a more advanced topic in sets.
by
Ricky Shadrach
Activity: Subsets
Venn Diagrams
Introduction to Groups
Sets Index