FM 3-14

ARMY SPACE OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2019
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION:
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
This publication supersedes FM 3-14, dated 19 August 2014.
HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
This publication is available at the Army Publishing Directorate site
([Link] and the Central Army Registry site
([Link]
This page intentionally left blank.
 *FM 3-14
Field Manual Headquarters
No. 3-14 Department of the Army
Washington, DC, 30 October 2019

Army Space Operations

Contents

Page
PREFACE.............................................................................................................. iv
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... v
Chapter 1 ARMY SPACE OPERATIONS OVERVIEW ...................................................... 1-1
Section I – Army Space Overview................................................................... 1-2
Dependency on Space ....................................................................................... 1-2
Army Space Capabilities .................................................................................... 1-4
Contested Space Domain................................................................................. 1-11
Unified Land Operations Use of Space Capabilities ........................................ 1-11
Section II – Space Fundamentals ................................................................. 1-11
Space Segments .............................................................................................. 1-11
Orbital Characteristics ...................................................................................... 1-12
Army Space Core Competencies ..................................................................... 1-14
Chapter 2 SPACE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT ........................................................ 2-1
Space Domain Is A Warfighting Domain ............................................................ 2-1
The Space Operational Environment ................................................................. 2-2
Electromagnetic Operational Environment ......................................................... 2-7
Hazards, Threats, and Vulnerabilities .............................................................. 2-14
Risk Management ............................................................................................. 2-15
Space Policy ..................................................................................................... 2-16
Chapter 3 ARMY SPACE CAPABILITIES.......................................................................... 3-1
Section I – Space Capabilities ......................................................................... 3-1
Space Situational Awareness ............................................................................. 3-2
Positioning, Navigation, and Timing ................................................................... 3-2
Space Control ..................................................................................................... 3-3
Satellite Communications ................................................................................... 3-6
Satellite Operations .......................................................................................... 3-12
Missile Warning ................................................................................................ 3-15
Environmental Monitoring ................................................................................. 3-17
Space-Based Surveillance and Reconnaissance ............................................ 3-18

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: This publication is approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
This publication supersede FM 3-14, dated 19 August 2014.

FM 3-14 i
Contents

Section II – Space-Enabled Capabilities ....................................................... 3-19

Friendly Force Tracking .................................................................................... 3-19
Commercial Imagery ......................................................................................... 3-21
Tactical Exploitation of National Capability ....................................................... 3-21
Section III – Army Space Proponent and Contributors ............................... 3-22
Army Space Proponent Role ............................................................................ 3-22
Cyberspace Proponent Role ............................................................................. 3-23
Signal Proponent Role ...................................................................................... 3-23
Chapter 4 ARMY SPACE OPERATIONS ........................................................................... 4-1
Section I – Army Space Operations ................................................................ 4-1
Army Space Support Elements ........................................................................... 4-2
Army Space Support Teams ............................................................................... 4-3
Army Headquarters, Corps and Division............................................................. 4-3
Unified Land Operations Use of Space Capabilities ........................................... 4-9
Army-Wide Space Training Considerations ...................................................... 4-14
Section II – Joint Space Operations .............................................................. 4-15
United States Space Command........................................................................ 4-15
Space Coordinating Authority ........................................................................... 4-16
Chapter 5 PLANNING, PREPARING, EXECUTING, AND ASSESSING ........................... 5-1
Army Design Methodology .................................................................................. 5-1
Planning for Space Operations ........................................................................... 5-1
Preparing for Space Operations ....................................................................... 5-11
Executing Space Operations ............................................................................ 5-12
Assessing Space Operations ............................................................................ 5-12
Chapter 6 SPACE PRODUCTS........................................................................................... 6-1
Purpose of The Space Input ............................................................................... 6-1
Space Input to the Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Process ............... 6-2
Space Running Estimate .................................................................................... 6-7
Satellite Operational Status ................................................................................ 6-8
Appendix A ANNEX C, APPENDIX 18 TEMPLATE ............................................................. A-1
GLOSSARY .......................................................................................... Glossary-1
REFERENCES.................................................................................. References-1
INDEX ......................................................................................................... Index-1

Figures
Figure 1-1. Army space operations concept overview ........................................................... 1-3
Figure 1-2: Illustration of basic satellite orbits ...................................................................... 1-12
Figure 2-1. Space operations persistence across the joint phasing model ......................... 2-13
Figure 2-2. Space threat categories ..................................................................................... 2-15
Figure 3-1. Key satellite communications features ................................................................ 3-6
Figure 3-2. Regional satellite communications support center support assignments ......... 3-10
Figure 3-3. Regional satellite communications support center organizations ..................... 3-12
Figure 3-4. Wideband satellite communications operations centers mission overview ....... 3-14

ii FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Contents

Figure 3-5. Friendly force tracking data flow overview ......................................................... 3-20
Figure 6-1. Situation template with space area of interest ..................................................... 6-3
Figure A-1. Sample Annex C, Appendix 18–Space Operations format .................................A-2

Tables
Introductory table 1. New, modified, and rescinded Army terms...............................................vi
Table 1-1. Characteristics of satellite orbits ......................................................................... 1-13
Table 2-1. Bandwidth comparison .......................................................................................... 2-8
Table 3-1. Satellite communications attributes ....................................................................... 3-7
Table 5-1. Receipt of mission ................................................................................................. 5-3
Table 5-2. Mission analysis .................................................................................................... 5-5
Table 5-3. Course of action development .............................................................................. 5-7
Table 5-4. Course of action analysis ...................................................................................... 5-8
Table 5-5. Course of action comparison ................................................................................ 5-8
Table 5-6. Course of action approval ..................................................................................... 5-9
Table 5-7. Orders production, dissemination, and transition .................................................. 5-9
Table 6-1. Space weather impact summary ........................................................................... 6-4

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 iii

 Preface
Field manual (FM) 3-14, Army Space Operations, provides an overview of space operations in the Army and
is consistent and compatible with joint doctrine. FM 3-14 links Army space operations doctrine to joint space
operations doctrine as expressed in joint publication (JP) 3-14, Space Operations and other joint doctrinal
publications. This FM establishes guidance for employing space and space-based systems and capabilities to
support U.S. Army land warfighting dominance. It provides a general overview of overhead support to Army
operations, reviews national guidance and direction, and outlines selected unique space-related Army
capabilities. The doctrine in this FM represents the Army’s best use of its space capabilities. This manual
also contains tactics and procedures outlining how to plan, integrate, and execute Army space operations.
The principal audience for FM 3-14 encompasses all members of the Army profession, including Army
commanders and staffs, to assist in the planning and incorporation of space capabilities into operations. It
will aid Army and joint force commanders in planning and executing cohesive joint operations throughout
the entire operational environment. Commanders and staffs of Army headquarters serving as joint task force
or multinational headquarters should also refer to applicable joint or multinational doctrine concerning the
range of military operations and joint or multinational forces. Trainers and educators throughout the Army
may also use this manual.
Commanders, staffs, and subordinates ensure their decisions and actions comply with applicable U.S.,
international, and in some cases, host-nation laws and regulations. Commanders at all levels ensure their
Soldiers operate in accordance with the law of war and the rules of engagement (see FM 6-27).
FM 3-14 uses joint terms where applicable. Selected joint and Army terms and definitions appear in both the
glossary and the text. Terms for which FM 3-14 is the proponent publication (the authority) are marked with
an asterisk (*) in the glossary. Definitions for which FM 3-14 is the proponent publication are boldfaced in
the text. For other definitions shown in the text, the term is italicized and the number of the proponent
publication follows the definition.
FM 3-14 applies to the Active Army, Army National Guard/Army National Guard of the United States, and
United States Army Reserve unless otherwise stated.
The proponent of FM 3-14 is the United States Army Space and Missile Defense Command (USASMDC).
The preparing agency is the US Army Space and Missile Defense Center of Excellence. Send comments and
recommendations on a DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) to
Director, Army Space and Missile Defense School, Headquarters USASMDC ATTN: SMDC-CE-TI (FM 3-
14), 1330 Inverness Drive, Suite 440, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80910; by e-mail to
[Link]-doctrine@[Link]; or submit an electronic DA Form 2028.

iv FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Introduction
Over the last three decades, assumptions of individual domain supremacy and the break in great power
security competition drove the U.S. joint force doctrine, equipment, and readiness posture. These
assumptions have evolved when faced with recent changes to peer and near-peer nation capabilities and
approaches to warfare.
In order to win in a complex operational environment (OE), Army forces should provide the joint force with
multiple options, integrate the efforts of multiple partners, operate across multiple domains, and present threat
actors with multiple dilemmas. Army space operations provide Army and joint forces with global combat
advantage using highly technical capabilities to create multiple dilemmas for threat actors on the battlefield.
The space domain is a warfighting domain with different characteristics from air, land, maritime, and
cyberspace domains. The National Military Strategy of the United States of America identified the space
domain as a global commons—those portions of the Earth, outside national jurisdiction, all actors have
rightful access to. This FM is rooted in Army operations and consistent with joint doctrine.
Nearly every Army operation relies on the advantages provided by space capabilities and effects to enhance
the effectiveness of combat forces. Space capabilities permit enhanced situational understanding; provides
global communications; enables precise and accurate fires; supports the conduct of joint expeditionary entry,
movement, and maneuver operations; and provides a conduit for cyber electromagnetic operations supporting
Unified Land Operations. These capabilities directly support large scale combat operations by enhancing
command and control, providing secure communications over extended distances and across areas without
modern infrastructure.
Potential adversaries have identified U.S. reliance on space-based capabilities as a critical vulnerability and
will attempt to exploit it in order to deter and degrade our ability to act. Army space operations seek ways to
maintain assured access to space capabilities, and when necessary, to achieve its objectives in spite of the
adversary’s counterspace efforts.
Army space operations are conducted around the globe, but engaged regionally. Army space operations often
are an integral part of a joint team used to plan, fight, and adapt operations across the range of military
operations. Army space operations continue to evolve to meet the requirements of a complex and rapidly
changing OE.
Army space doctrine refines and expands upon joint space doctrine by defining those space tactics and
procedures relevant to unified land operations and applicable to large scale combat operations. Army space
operations applies to the tactical, operational, and strategic levels of war, but the results are often challenging
to quantify which level or levels benefit as modern conflict may not be easily divided into discrete levels. In
an internet-connected world which often exploits social media, theater-level tactical actions may have far-
reaching operational and strategic-level impacts. The space capabilities form the framework for how space
operations supports the Army warfighting functions.
The principles that successfully guide unified land operations are applicable to the space domain. The Army
uses space-based capabilities to support its dominance in unified land operations. Space operations are critical
to the range of military operations as many space capabilities are embedded in Army operations.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 v

Introduction

Summary of Changes
FM 3-14 was completely rewritten to document Army-centric space operations. The current manual aligns
Army doctrine with JP 3-14. FM 3-14 updates terminology, highlights the critical support Army space
operations play in joint operations, and links space operations with the warfighting functions. A summary of
changes is below.
 Adds an Army space operations overview diagram to chapter 1.
 Greatly expands on operational environment and clearly identifies how space capabilities
contribute to the operational environment.
 Removes unit specific battalion and below material which is inappropriate to an FM.
 Discusses capabilities such as positioning, navigation, and timing; satellite operations; satellite
communications; and space control as integrated effects and not isolated, stove-piped functions.
 Updates the operations process in chapter 5.
 Renames Annex N–Space Operations as Appendix 18–Space Operations to Annex C of the base
order.
The following terminology is deleted per Department of Defense Dictionary.
Introductory table 1. New, modified, and rescinded Army terms
Term Remarks
prevention Term rescinded.
space force application Term rescinded.
space force enhancement Term rescinded.
space mission areas Term rescinded.
space support Formal definition rescinded, used informally as a
commonly understood term
space surveillance Formal definition rescinded, used informally as a
commonly understood term
space system Formal definition rescinded, used informally as a
commonly understood term
theater event system No longer a defined term.
space domain New term.
space joint operating area New term.
defensive space control Modified definition.
negation Modified definition.
offensive space control Modified definition.
space coordinating authority Modified definition.
space forces Modified definition.
space situational awareness Modified definition.
space superiority Modified definition.

vi FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Introduction

Chapter Organization
FM 3-14 contains six chapters and one Appendix:
Chapter 1 is an overview of Army space operations. It includes a top-level operational view (known as an
OV-1) of Army operations utilizing space capabilities and serves to illustrate the dependencies upon space
operations and space-based connectivity. It categorizes and describes the functions of Army space operations
and Army space-enabled operations. It identifies and describes operations in a contested environment and
describes the space domain environment.
Chapter 2 is the space OE and how it is shaped by national and Army space policy. It includes how Army
space operations uses operational and mission variables to contribute to antiaccess and area denial operations
resulting in mission assurance. Army space operations reside in a contested space environment and the
persistence of Army space operations drives missions and space operations tempo.
Chapter 3 identifies Army space capabilities, describes Army space operations regarding those capabilities,
and identifies the various Army proponents and their roles in space operations.
Chapter 4 discusses Army space operations, roles, and responsibilities at headquarters levels, operations for
Army space elements, coordination between Army and joint forces related to space operations, and how Army
space operations supports each of the six warfighting functions, and special operations forces.
Chapter 5 discusses planning, preparing, executing, and assessing space capabilities within the operations
process.
Chapter 6 identifies space input to the intelligence preparation of the battlefield, and developing the space
running estimate.
Appendix A identifies Appendix 18–Space Operations to Annex C of the base order, its relationship to other
annexes, its content, and the considerations for preparing Appendix 18.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 vii

This page intentionally left blank.
 Chapter 1
Army Space Operations Overview
Unified land operations and Army space operations are indivisible. A typical Army Brigade Combat
Team has over 2,500 positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT)-enabled devices and over 250
satellite communications (SATCOM)-enabled devices used to conduct precision fires, movement,
maneuver, communications, protection, command and control, and other mission requirements.
This chapter provides a general overview of the depth and breadth of available space capabilities to
conduct unified land operations. It recognizes the different career specialties the Army uses to
support space operations and space-enabled operations. It identifies how the Army must plan to
operate in a contested space domain which may be exploited by threat actors to create a denied,
degraded, and disrupted space operational environment (D3SOE). It provides space fundamentals
lists the approved Army space core competencies.
1-1. The space capabilities the Army uses are dependent on both the space domain (the physical location
where space-based satellites transmit and receive signals) and Army space operations to conduct the planning,
coordination, integration, and synchronization of space capabilities across all functions within unified land
operations. While the Army is capable of completing its assigned mission in a D3SOE, it is more agile and
efficient when using space capabilities to their fullest ability.
1-2. Space operations are inherently joint and Army space forces routinely coordinate with Army, joint,
and unified action partners on the best way to employ space capabilities. U.S. Army space operations are
firmly established in national, Department of Defense (DOD), and Service level policies that guide space
operations. Army Space force personnel consist of trusted Army professionals who work diligently to assure
continuous access to space capabilities.
1-3. Assured access to space capabilities is a framework of capabilities, actions, and processes to assure
Soldiers can to shoot, move, and communicate where and when desired, to achieve the commander’s intent.
The Army invests in space capabilities and its use of the space domain is broad. Space capabilities enable
and enhance tactical operations across the range of military operations. Many aspects of space operations
have become normalized in Army operations and are routinely integrated into mission plans. However,
assured access to space capabilities is a necessity for agile and efficient mission operations.
1-4. The space domain is defined as the area above the altitude where atmospheric effects on airborne
objects become negligible (JP 3-14). The space domain is a physical location where military, civil, and
commercial space activities are conducted and the upper limit extends infinitely outward. Military activities
within the space domain are conducted to achieve U.S. national security objectives.
1-5. Space forces are the space and terrestrial systems, equipment, facilities, organizations, and personnel,
or combination thereof, necessary to conduct space operations (JP 3-14). A space asset is the equipment that
is an individual part of a space system, which is or can be placed in space or directly supports space activity
terrestrially (JP 3-14). The space forces and space assets support all warfighting functions and enable the
Army to communicate, navigate, target hostiles, protect our forces, and operate in a contested OE more
efficiently.
1-6. The space environment is the environment corresponding to the space domain, where electromagnetic
radiation, charged particles, and electric and magnetic fields are the dominant physical influences, and that
encompasses the earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere, interplanetary space, and the solar atmosphere (JP
3-59). Space operations are those operations impacting or directly utilizing space-based assets to enhance the
potential of the U.S. and unified action partners. The space joint operating area is the operational area,
bounded by the space domain, assigned to Commander, United States Strategic Command, in which space
operations are conducted (JP 3-14).

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 1-1

Chapter 1

1-7. Space capabilities provide a global perspective as space-based sensors provide support to unified land
operations. Space capabilities contribute solutions to counter theater antiaccess (A2) and area denial (AD)
strategies. Antiaccess is action, activity, or capability, usually long-range, designed to prevent an advancing
enemy force from entering an operational area (JP 3-0). Area denial is action, activity, or capability, usually
short-range, designed to limit an enemy force’s freedom of action within an operational area (JP 3-0).

SECTION I – ARMY SPACE OVERVIEW

DEPENDENCY ON SPACE
1-8. For over a half century, space capabilities have enhanced the effectiveness of joint forces during times
of peace and times of war, reinforcing the significance of space capabilities when integrated across the range
of military operations. Mission planning requires consideration of space operations across all domains,
activities, and an organization processes to ensure capabilities are available, integrated, and effects used.
1-9. JP 3-14 lays the foundation of joint space doctrine by establishing principles for the integrated
employment of space capabilities. It recognizes each Service has a unique role in providing space capabilities,
and the capabilities provided by one service are integrated into the planning and operations of all services.
As designated by the DOD, each Service component provides different space-related capabilities designed
to complement the space capabilities of the other Services, not duplicate them. The Air Force provides launch
services, the Air Force and Navy acquire military satellites, the Army and Air Force manage long-haul use
of military SATCOM, and all three operate satellites. The Army, Navy, and Air Force provide ground
hardware, and all Services benefit from space capabilities.
1-10. Space superiority is the degree of control in space of one force over any others that permits the
conduct of its operations at a given time and place without prohibitive interference from terrestrial or space-
based threats (JP 3-14). In unified land operations, space superiority enables freedom of maneuver and
accurate fires, when and where needed. Space superiority is a function of the space domain and may be
maintained for long periods of time, or obtained for short windows of time for specific operations. Space
superiority contributes decisive wins in high-intensity conflicts against any adversary, anytime, and
anywhere.
1-11. The Army leverages space capabilities to support unified land operations from large scale combat
operations to individual Soldiers at the tactical level of warfare. Space capabilities enhance the Army’s ability
to communicate, navigate, accurately target the enemy, protect and sustain our forces, and enable intelligence
preparation of the battlefield (IPB). While the Army is dependent on Army space operations, it is sometimes
difficult to observe the effects or direct impact of space operations because the desired effect may be difficult
to observe.
1-12. Allied Joint Publication (AJP)-3.3, states, “To ensure effective integration, all personnel engaged in
the planning, conduct, and supervision of joint operations must have a common and clear understanding of
how space capabilities (military, civil, commercial, national, and multinational) contribute to joint operations,
and how military space operations can be integrated in military operations to achieve alliance security
objectives. They should also be aware adversaries will increasingly seek to exploit their own access to space
products with military utility; many of these can easily be purchased from commercial sources.”
1-13. Commanders at all echelons must understand the fundamental principles and advantages space
operations bring to all Army operations, the disadvantages associated with not understanding space
capabilities, and the impact to mission operations when friendly forces are denied the use of space
capabilities. Space operations bring essential capabilities with unique tools to influence, enable, and enhance
all mission areas in unified land operations. Unit commanders must have a clear understanding of the space
capabilities available that contribute to mission operations and how best to utilize those assets.
1-14. Army space operations conceptual overview is illustrated in figure 1-1. The illustration highlights
how unified land operations and Army space operations are indivisible across the range of military options
in an OE. Without these capabilities, unified land operations as they are conducted today would be
significantly different.

1-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations Overview

Figure 1-1. Army space operations concept overview

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 1-3

Chapter 1

ARMY SPACE CAPABILITIES

1-15. All Services contribute to and use the body of knowledge residing within the ten codified space
capabilities. Some capabilities are provided by other Services and Agencies, but they are required to support
Army operations and contribute to the success of Army missions. Army space operations may receive space-
related intelligence and environmental monitoring products through Army intelligence channels, directly
from other Services, centers, or agencies.
1-16. The distinct space capabilities, effects, and products used by the Army, joint, allied forces, and partner
nations are planned, developed, prepared, and made available to the force by Soldiers conducting Army space
operations and space-enabled operations. The Soldiers conducting space operations and space-enabled
operations may be assigned to space operations, signal, cyber, electronic warfare, intelligence operations,
and other military operations specialties. Not all Army Soldiers who configure and use equipment reliant on
space capabilities are designated as space operators. However, these Soldiers are instrumental to the Army’s
critical use of space capabilities in unified land operations.
1-17. Army space-related activities include:
 Army space operations, duties, and responsibilities are centered on these eight codified joint space
capabilities: space situational awareness (SSA), PNT, space control, SATCOM, satellite
operations, missile warning, environmental monitoring, and space-based intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance. There are two other codified joint space capabilities—nuclear
detonation detection and spacelift—but the Army has no involvement with those.
 Army space-enabled operations are not specifically codified in joint doctrine as space capabilities,
but are combined, derived, or second order tasks and actions enabled by space capabilities. These
include, but are not limited to, joint friendly force tracking (FFT), network transport of
Department of Defense information network, commercial imagery, National Reconnaissance
Office overhead systems, Army tactical exploitation of national capabilities (TENCAP) program,
National-to-Theater program interfaces, geospatial intelligence, integrated broadcast service, and
common interactive broadcast.

ARMY SPACE OPERATIONS

1-18. Legal considerations are substantive to space operations and many are laid out in space policies.
Employing space capabilities brings up complex legal considerations involving international law, the law of
armed conflict, and relevant codes of conduct. Considerations of proportionality, military necessity,
discrimination, and humanity apply equally to the space domain as to operations elsewhere (AJP-3.3).
Consistent with the inherent right of self-defense, the Army must deter others from interference and attack,
defend our space assets, and contribute to the defense of multinational space assets. If deterrence fails, the
Army must defeat efforts to negate U.S. space capabilities consistent with the standing rules of engagement.
1-19. Space situational awareness is the requisite foundational, current, and predictive knowledge and
characterization of space objects and the OE upon which space operations depend (JP 3-14). SSA involves
characterizing, as completely as necessary, the space capabilities operating within the terrestrial environment
and the space domain. SSA combines the output of a wide variety of products and sources, including
intelligence and cyberspace sources, to provide insight into adversary use of space capabilities and their
potential to threaten friendly space capabilities. SSA contributes to a commander’s ability to understand
adversary intent. SSA is a key component for space control because it is the foundation for accomplishing
all space control tasks.
1-20. PNT. The space-based Global Positioning System (GPS) is a satellite-based radio navigation system
operated by the Department of Defense to provide all military, civil, and commercial users with precise PNT.
The GPS is a DOD owned and operated global navigation satellite system (GNSS)—the general term applied
to any space-based system providing PNT information across the globe. GPS provides essential, precise, and
reliable timing information which enables forces to more effectively execute unified land operations. Assured
PNT information is a mission essential element in nearly every modern weapon system.

1-4 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations Overview

 GPS enables precision attack from stand-off distances, reducing collateral damage and allowing
friendly forces to avoid threat areas. It enables FFT to avoid specific areas and aid in rescue
operations; it increases tactical operating ranges by providing specific location coordinates,
fosters precision movement and maneuver, enables unmanned aerial systems which provide
situational understanding, and many other functions. Precision timing provides the Army the
ability to synchronize tactical digital networks, wide area networking, and communications
capabilities such as frequency hopping. It enables targeting and fires with increased lethality and
reduces collateral damage to civilians and infrastructure.
 The loss of GPS may yield a decrease in the efficiency to conduct mission operations. All Soldiers
must understand the extent their forces and equipment rely on PNT information and how degraded
or denied GPS information may impacts Army operations. The impact to systems go beyond
handheld GNSS devices. The loss of GPS may impact network time protocol—which helps keeps
communications networks and computers synchronized—command and control devices,
maneuver forces, aviation platforms, precision munitions, and other systems.
1-21. Space Control is the operations to ensure freedom of action in space for the U.S. and its allies and
deny an adversary freedom of action in space (JP 3-14). The Army conducts space control by using globally
deployable units to conduct surveillance and assessment of space systems in support of military and civil
operations. Units conducting space control plan and conduct system diagnostic monitoring, vulnerability
assessments, data integrity studies, and quality control in support of U.S. military SATCOM or other
capabilities. Space control supports freedom of action in the space domain for friendly forces, and when
necessary, defeats adversary efforts to interfere with or attack U.S. or allied space systems and negates
adversary space capabilities. It consists of defensive space control (DSC), offensive space control (OSC),
and navigation warfare (NAVWAR).
 Defensive space control is active and passive measures taken to protect friendly space capabilities
from attack, interference, or unintentional hazards (JP 3-14). These actions protect friendly
SATCOM and other space capabilities from attack, interference, unauthorized intrusions, or
unintentional hazards.
 Offensive space control is offensive operations conducted for space negation (JP 3-14). Negation,
in space operations are measures to deceive, disrupt, degrade, deny, or destroy space systems (JP
3-14).
 NAVWAR is the deliberate defensive and offensive action to assure and prevent PNT information
through coordinated employment of space, cyberspace, and electronic warfare operations (JP 3-
14). The effects of a NAVWAR environment on systems are complex and ranges from limited in
scope and area to enveloping an entire area of responsibility (AOR). NAVWAR effects include
varying conditions from mildly degraded to totally disrupted GNSS signals, and may include
spoofing– an emulated signal with false and misleading information. Space operations focus on
space-based PNT signals, situational understanding, and space control operations. Cyberspace
operations protect friendly networks that leverage GNSS, while targeting similar adversary
capabilities. Electronic warfare operations—consisting of electronic support, electronic attack,
and electronic protection—conducted in support of NAVWAR denies adversary access to GNSS
information, and protects friendly capabilities within the electromagnetic spectrum (EMS).
1-22. SATCOM provides the necessary connectivity for worldwide communications and mobile forces
operating over large, dispersed areas. It provides the Army critical connectivity for tactical maneuver forces
and Soldiers whose rapid movement and geographically dispersed deployments move them away from direct
access to land lines and line of sight communication.
 Each regional satellite communications support center (RSSC) is a multi-service, multi-agency
organization providing theater communication planners with a single point of contact for satellite
access planning of military narrowband, wideband, protected band, and commercial SATCOM
support. The RSSC is the theater center of expertise for all military and commercial SATCOM
serving operating forces. The Army manages four RSSCs.
 The Army is the Consolidated SATCOM System Expert for Wideband and Narrowband
SATCOM systems, and satellite communications system expert for Defense Satellite
Communications System (DSCS), Wideband Global Satellite Communications (WGS), Mobile

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 1-5

Chapter 1

User Objective System, and the Global Broadcast Service. Duties of the Consolidated SATCOM
System Expert include providing continuous support to deconflict, assess, analyze, and integrate
SATCOM information, status, configurations, synchronization, sustainment issues, deployment
issues, and anomalies for all Services and joint operations.
1-23. Satellite Operations. Satellite Operations maneuver, configure, operate, and sustain on-orbit assets
and are characterized as spacecraft and payload operations. The Army has primary responsibility for
planning, operational management, and payload control of DOD’s wideband satellite systems. The major
elements of Army satellite operations are transmission control, satellite payload control, assured access to
SATCOM (included using wartime reserve modes, contingency plans for outages, the ability to re-route
services across all platforms, to reconstitute or augment existing capabilities, or to neutralize the source of
the disruption), and support to electromagnetic interference resolution on military narrowband and wideband
SATCOM constellations.
 The Army operates five wideband satellite communications operations centers (WSOC). A unique
satellite control battalion with specially trained Signal Soldiers conducts satellite payload
configuration management, implements satellite transmission plans, conducts link monitoring,
and controls DOD wideband military SATCOM systems. Each WSOC provides transmission
control and satellite payload control for DOD wideband military SATCOM systems enabling
wideband SATCOM for all users on these constellations. WSOCs provide support to
electromagnetic interference resolution on DSCS and WGS constellations. Strategic wideband
SATCOM is used to carry high volumes of communications around the world and is the primary
fixed and transportable means for reachback communications from in-theater headquarters to
those in continental U.S. Operating these centers enables communications for the Commander in
Chief, Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, all Services, State Department,
intelligence activities, combatant commanders, and international partners.
1-24. Theater Missile Warning.
 Missile warning is based on detecting an event. Ground-based radars detect the movement of
ballistic missiles and high energy infrared (heat) events—such as the hot exhaust of an
intercontinental ballistic missile. Theater missile warning reports these detections throughout the
depths of the battlespace.
 Provides joint forces with theater early warning to dissuade, deter, and defeat ballistic missile
attacks. Joint Tactical Ground Stations (JTAGS) provide in-theater warning of ballistic missile
launches. JTAGS units receive downlink data directly from space-based infrared sensors on
ballistic missile launches, other events of interest, and battlespace characterization—such as a
large oil refiner explosion.
 JTAGS ground stations are forward deployed and strategically located to provide warning and
threat characterization in support of the U.S. homeland defense and theater ballistic missile
defense. JTAGS units process and provide warning, alerting, and cueing information to joint
forces commanders, tier 1 command centers, forward joint forces, and other interested units.
1-25. Environmental Monitoring. Space forces provide data on meteorological, oceanographic, and space
environmental factors which might affect military operations. Space capabilities provide data for forecasts,
alerts, and warnings of the space environment which may negatively impact space assets, space operations,
and terrestrial users. Imagery capabilities can provide joint force planners with current information on sub-
surface, surface, and air conditions, such as trafficability and land use, beach conditions, vegetation, cloud
cover, and moonlight percentage. Imagery may be used by the Army Corps of Engineers to monitor civil
infrastructure during natural disasters and for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. Knowledge of these
factors allows ground forces to avoid adverse environmental conditions while taking advantage of other
conditions to enhance operations. This space-based capability supports IPB by providing the information
needed to identify and analyze potential courses of action.
1-26. Space-based intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance is a joint space capability. A space
capability is the ability of a space asset to accomplish a mission or the ability of a terrestrial-based asset to
accomplish a mission in or through space (JP 3-14). Within the Army, the deputy chief of staff, intelligence
(G-2) is the responsible agent for providing intelligence to Army forces. Refer to Army doctrine publication
(ADP) 2-0 for information on Intelligence operations.

1-6 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations Overview

ARMY SPACE ELEMENTS AND TEAMS

1-27. An Army space support element (SSE) serves as an integral part of the headquarters staff directly
involved in the staff planning and targeting process, and coordinates directly with other space staffs on
procedures for space support requests and reachback support. They are assigned to every Army, corps, and
division headquarters staff. SSEs are part of the military decisionmaking process (MDMP) to ensure space
capabilities and effects are optimized to meet the commander’s intent. They identify the utility of employing
specific space capabilities, coordinate for those capabilities which do not fall under the purview of other staff
elements, integrate them into plans, and ensure they are synchronize in operations. They develop Appendix
18–Space Operations to Annex C of a commander’s base plan or order to describe how Army space
operations are integrated into the concept of operations.
1-28. Army space brigade and battalions provide trained and ready Soldiers to conduct SATCOM, satellite
operations, missile warning, and space control directly supporting the warfighter, and provides other
capabilities for Army and joint space operations. An Army space support team (ARSST) provides space
planning expertise, capabilities, products, and SSA of space assets. The team deploys and integrates with a
host unit to provide direct support to Army brigades and higher echelons (as necessary), Army Special
Operations forces, Marine Expeditionary Forces, and may be deployed to support an SSE. An ARSST team
may be tailored in a variety of ways to fulfill a request for forces.
1-29. An Army space control planning teams provide the Army with space control planning capabilities.
The focus of the space control planning teams is to support commands exercising operational control of space
control systems and capabilities. Space control planning teams operate at the combatant commander or joint
force commander level where they integrate into the headquarters element. They provide space control
planning integration and expertise on Army space control capabilities to coordinate effects, timing, and tempo
with centralized operational space control capabilities. Planning for space control operations should be
conducted by space operations Soldiers who are subject matter expertise in space control.
1-30. An Army space coordination element has Army space operations coordination responsibilities.
Residing within an Army battlefield coordination detachment at a theater air operations center, they
coordinate land component commanders space operations requirements between air component commander
and the space coordinating authority (SCA). They assist SSEs to ensure Army space equities are recognized
and incorporated into joint space operations, assist in the joint space planning process, and assist in the
development of space priorities in support of the land component commander.

ARMY SPACE-ENABLED OPERATIONS

1-31. Network Transport. SATCOM is a key means of information transport for unified land operations.
SATCOM systems provide long-haul capability, multi-path options for tactical communications,
communications on-the-move, beyond line of sight communications, and flexibility to commanders and
warfighters. SATCOM systems are located at every echelon in the Army and support all operations. Support
to intra-theater communications and connectivity to Department of Defense information network provides
critical services routed through military narrowband and wideband SATCOM constellation. These services
include the Defense Switched Network, Defense Red Switched Network, Defense Messaging System, video
teleconferencing, Telemedicine, Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET), SECRET
Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET), and the global mission networks.
1-32. Expeditionary Signal Units. An expeditionary signal unit provides communications support for an
area of operations to establish a tactical network. An appropriately sized expeditionary signal unit—brigade,
battalion, company, or platoon—contains the necessary personnel, transmission systems, network
management systems, and mission command information systems necessary to create a correctly sized,
complete communications node.
1-33. Army tactical ground operations depend on signal Soldiers to establish satellite terminal connectivity
to use SATCOM for network transport. The tactical operations center is the center of activity behind tactical
battlefield operation where many of the SATCOM feeds terminate, the data is digested, and used to make
decisions. From headquarters at the battalion, up to corps, and often higher, the tactical operations center is
where staff sections come together to make battlefield decisions and issue orders.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 1-7

Chapter 1

1-34. Satellite terminals provide commanders and Soldiers with assured, reliable, high-speed, high-
capacity satellite terminal connectivity using military and commercial satellite constellations operating across
the ultrahigh frequency, super-high frequency, and extremely high frequency bands. The use of SATCOM
increases the operational reach and situational awareness of the entire force. The most common SATCOM
enabled equipment and terminals supporting tactical ground operations includes:
 The tactical communications node provides the principal network backbone element and support
command post operations for the mobile tactical network. The tactical communications node has
communication and networking equipment and allows Soldiers the ability to access a network at
a variety of security levels. While at-the-halt, the tactical communications node is equipped with
a variable height antenna to improve line of sight connectivity and specific satellite equipment for
high throughput.
 The command post node establishes a small to medium communications node that extends limited
NIPRNET, SIPRNET, secret and non-classified voice and video telecommunications services.
The command post node uses and a satellite transportable terminal to connect with a joint network
node via line of sight connectivity.
 Joint network node is a vehicle-mounted, satellite-based communication system. The system
provides beyond line of sight access to NIPRNET and SIPRNET capabilities with secure and non-
secure voice and video telecommunications.
 The satellite transportable terminal is a trailer-mounted SATCOM terminal that provides network
transport for the joint network node. It is designed to support tactical missions which require high
throughput communications.
 The Phoenix is a vehicle-mounted tactical satellite communications terminal. It provides a signal
battalion assured access to SATCOM and operational flexibility in a tactical environment by
providing a rapidly deployable capability. It has high capacity, inter-theater range for networked
battle command and control information.
 Global Rapid Response Information Package (known as GRRIP) provides secure, beyond-line of
sight voice and video telecommunications without the need for local network infrastructure. It
provides early entry capability and situational awareness in air-to-land missions and supports
initial entry teams that require high bandwidth network capability in austere environments.
 Transportable Tactical Command Communications (known as T2C2) are high-bandwidth satellite
terminals designed to enable initial entry forces to connect to the Army networks. It provides
voice and video telecommunications in an austere environment with limited infrastructure.
 The Secure, Mobile, Anti-Jam, Reliable, Tactical–Terminal (known as SMART-T) is a protected
band SATCOM system which enables commanders at brigade and higher to operate in a D3SOE.
 Global Broadcast Service receive suite (known as GBS-RS) provides high-speed one-way
broadcast of informative products such as video, imagery, maps, and weather data to deployed
tactical operations centers and garrisoned forces without overloading host unit command and
communication networks.
1-35. Friendly force tracking is the process of fixing, observing, and reporting the location and movement
of friendly forces (JP 3-09). FFT systems provide a commander the ability to track Army and joint units of
all sizes. It integrates SATCOM and PNT to provide continuous joint FFT to combatant commanders,
agencies, allies, and unified action partners. FFT improves situational awareness by providing the location
and movement of forces equipped with devices that transmit position location information to the theater
common operational picture (COP). Integrating the FFT information into the theater COP is of great
importance if a friendly force unit needs to be reinforced or removed from a difficult situation. FFT systems
provide the exact location information necessary to track units, and thus contribute to effective command and
control, situational understanding, personnel recovery, and fratricide avoidance.

Note: The COP is the primary tool for supporting the commander’s situational understanding. All
staff sections provide input from their area of expertise to the COP.

1-36. Commercial imagery. Unclassified commercial satellite imagery is used by joint and Army forces,
other government agencies, and multinational partners in the combatant commander’s area of responsibility

1-8 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations Overview

to enhance knowledge of the environment within the operational area. Unclassified commercial satellite
imagery is especially useful during coalition operations since it is more easily approved for release to share
with foreign militaries for enhanced mission operations.
1-37. National Reconnaissance Office overhead systems (known as NOS)—formerly referred to as national
technical means—are spaced-based sensors designed to collect data in order to support intelligence analysis.
National Reconnaissance Office overhead systems provides timely and accurate geospatial intelligence and
signals intelligence to national, strategic, operational, and tactical level requirements. Current and future
planning, nodal placement, and capability development is led by the National Reconnaissance Office,
intelligence community functional managers, and coordinated through the G-2 as the Army’s intelligence
community element lead.
1-38. Army TENCAP program. The Army TENCAP is a congressional mandate program responsible for
understanding, influencing, and integrating current and emerging space-based national systems data into the
tactical decision making process. It delivers unique capability as the Army’s lead activity to influence,
leverage, and integrate the national intelligence enterprise to benefit the Army through various ground, air,
and space capabilities.
1-39. Geospatial Intelligence and Geospatial Engineering. Geospatial intelligence is a discipline that
exploits and analyzes imagery and geospatial information to describe, assess, and visually depict physical
features and geographically referenced locations on the Earth. Geospatial intelligence consists of imagery,
imagery intelligence, and geospatial information. Geospatial engineers provide the capabilities and activities
that contribute to a clear understanding of the physical environment by providing geospatial information and
services to commanders and staffs. Both disciplines utilize remote sensing capabilities from space-based
capabilities to perform their duties.
1-40. At echelons above corps, geospatial intelligence reside at Military Intelligence Brigade–Theater and
at reach back centers such as National Ground Intelligence Center. The Army’s National-to-Theater program
leverages remote sensing data and imagery from ground, airborne, and spaced-based assets to provide timely,
tailored ground-related geospatial intelligence data. These products, and services support the DOD, Army
Service component commanders, their supported unified commands, subcomponent command, and the
intelligence community. Geospatial engineering capabilities reside in the engineer brigade, or geospatial
planning cell, with reach-back to the Army Geospatial Center. For more information on geospatial
intelligence see ATP 2-22.7.
1-41. At corps and below, local geospatial intelligence cells reside at the corps, divisions, brigade, special
operations forces, special mission units, security force assistance brigades, and military intelligence brigades.
The geospatial intelligence cells are co-located military intelligence and engineer personnel to synchronize
efforts and improve support to the commander and staff.
1-42. Signals intelligence is intelligence derived from communications, electronic, and foreign
instrumentation signals (JP 2-0). Signals intelligence leverages spaced-based capabilities to provide unique
intelligence information. It complements intelligence derived from other sources and is often used for cueing
other sensors to potential targets of interest.
1-43. Integrated broadcast service and common interactive broadcast. The integrated broadcast service and
common interactive broadcast capabilities occur within Army Military Intelligence channels with mission
partners.
 Integrated broadcast service and common interactive broadcast are integrated dissemination
systems which allow producers the means to disseminate strategic, operational, and tactical-level
information to the warfighter via multiple transmission paths in accordance with consumer-
generated dissemination priorities. These broadcast services are the DOD worldwide standard
networks for transmitting time-sensitive tactical to strategic intelligence and targeting data to all
echelons of Joint Service operational users. Users capture the valuable and unique characteristics
of the broadcasts, update their situational awareness, and integrate their capabilities. The
operational architecture promotes the integration and interoperability of joint, allied, and unified
action forces and systems.
 Common interactive broadcast is a robust multi-sensor, multi-source intelligence exploitation
capability. It is a set of approved ultrahigh frequency SATCOM military standards which support

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 1-9

Chapter 1

the requirements of a single broadcast using a single common message format for integrated
broadcast service. The common interactive broadcast is a theater-based ultrahigh frequency
SATCOM broadcast used to connect the producer community with deployed Soldiers. The
primary focus of the common interactive broadcast is to facilitate the reporting and dissemination
of threat warning and situation awareness data to combat forces in near real time.
1-44. Expeditionary Army space operations. Used to disrupt and deny enemy A2 and AD capabilities. The
primary design is to protect the joint force by targeting critical enemy assets such as integrated air defense
systems, cruise and ballistic missiles, aerial attack capabilities, and surveillance capabilities. Fires are
employed to open windows of advantage across the battlefield. Joint forces are supported throughout all
phases of the joint operation.
1-45. The forward-deployed units operates in theater as part of the counter-A2 and AD force in support of
a geographic combatant command and assigned to an Army Service component command. Units integrate
space operations with intelligence, information operation cyberspace, electronic warfare operations, and
signal assets to support force protection, target development, and information operations as required. Units
deliver offensive and defensive cyber effects, leverage joint and Army space capabilities, and employ
electronic warfare to support mission objectives. Units provide 24-hour command and control, and
continuous mission analysis to ensure synchronized operations. The four detachment subordinate teams are
intelligence, cyberspace electromagnetic activities, space operations, and signal.
1-46. Space teams consist of two entities, a space control planning team on the headquarters staff and a
space crew to provide effects.
 The space control planning team provides an organic space support planning capability, and
consist of space control personnel. The space control planning team characterizes adversary,
neutral, and friendly space capabilities operating within the terrestrial environment and the space
domains. They integrate space control and SSA into operations and serve as an advisor to the staff
members on space control capabilities and limitations. They are the conduit between the staff,
higher headquarters, and external space support agencies for all space-related activities.
 The space crew delivers space-related effects. They characterize space capabilities operating
within the battlespace, support freedom of action within the space domain for friendly forces, and
defeat enemy efforts that interfere with or attack joint or allied space systems. The space crew
denies windows of opportunity for the enemy to exploit operations through the space domain.
They conduct assessment of space systems to support military operations, plan and conduct
vulnerability assessments, conduct data integrity studies, and quality control to support U.S.
military SATCOM.

HIGH ALTITUDE OPERATIONS

1-47. High altitude air operations are not considered space assets. However, they are so closely aligned
with space capabilities they belong to the same Force Modernization Proponent. High altitude platforms are
designed to augment capabilities provided by space-based satellites and provide additional capabilities not
readily available from space-based sensors in a rapidly changing environment. High altitude operations are
conducted utilizing the joint aerial layer network between 60,000 and 100,000 feet above mean sea level.
1-48. High altitude platforms provide rapidly deployed capabilities to tactical forces. Platforms include
super-pressure balloons, zero-pressure balloons, long endurance fixed-wing aircraft, and dirigibles. Payloads
may be configured to accommodate one or multiple missions and may be configured as requirements change.
Payloads may include pseudolites—ground or high altitude-based satellite imitators—synthetic aperture
radar, wide-area motion sensors, bi-static radar, peer-to-peer data links, and re-transmission or extension
payloads such as very high frequency, ultrahigh frequency, Ka-band, and other radio band signals.
1-49. A few advantages of high altitude operations over space-based platforms are persistence over an area,
extended operating distances for line of sight communications, and being physically closer to the AOR which
may provide better imagery. One of the disadvantages of high altitude operations compared to space-based
platforms is the necessity to have air superiority.

1-10 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations Overview

CONTESTED SPACE DOMAIN

1-50. Operations in the space domain are increasingly contested, degraded, and operationally limited. The
Army and joint forces must plan to operate in a contested space domain. The threat to Army and joint
operations from a contested, degraded, and operationally limited space domain may create critical
vulnerabilities for threat actors to exploit against unified land operations. These perceived vulnerabilities
make contesting the space domain attractive to threat actors. Threat actors may take A2 and AD actions in
an attempt to create multiple effects against U.S. and allied forces. Army forces must be prepared to conduct
operations against A2 and AD actions.
1-51. Denied, degraded, and disrupted space operational environment is a composite of those conditions
and influences in which space-enabled capabilities have been impaired by hostile threats or non-hostile
means. Army space operations must remain flexible to commanders’ needs and stay agile in response to
threat actor exploitation efforts to place Army and joint forces into a D3SOE, which is the results of a threat
actor implementation of A2 and AD strategies. D3SOE is the most recognizable impact to space operations
from threat actors. The difference between D3SOE and OSC is that D3SOE is an enemy AD strategy to
negate U.S. capabilities and OSC is used to negate enemy capabilities.
1-52. Maneuver in the space domain is similar to maneuver conducted in the physical domains, but more
complex. For instance, maneuver in a physical domain requires three-dimensional positioning and time.
Maneuver in the space domain can be physical or virtual. It requires the ability of Soldiers to adapt or adjust
operating parameters such as frequency, power, or modulation to gain a relative advantage over the enemy.
Maneuver in the space domain puts the Army and joint force in a position of relative advantage over the
enemy and may help counter the effects of a D3SOE.

UNIFIED LAND OPERATIONS USE OF SPACE CAPABILITIES

1-53. Operations conducted in the space domain are a significant force multiplier because of their cross
domain connectivity and the asymmetric advantage provided. Space operations are integral to successfully
conducting large scale combat operations as part of unified land operations.
The Army’s warfighting functions, weapons, and battle systems are vitally dependent on
space. We must fully leverage allied, national, and joint space capabilities to enable our
warfighting functions and provide space support to all ground component forces.
2013 Army Strategic Planning Guidance
1-54. It is within the warfighting functions framework many space operations dependencies are identified.

SECTION II – SPACE FUNDAMENTALS

SPACE SEGMENTS
1-55. The space domain is the ultimate high ground and gives users the advantage of a global, persistent
perspective of the strategic, operational, and tactical situation. Satellites are well suited for communications,
PNT, weather, reconnaissance and surveillance, imagery, mapping, and intelligence operations because of
the access and perspectives they provide. They provide freedom of action, global reach, responsiveness, and
insights to A2 and AD, and are not constrained by geographic borders or denied regions. However, space
operations are bound by constraints such as physics, international law, and policies. Each has a unique set of
challenges and vulnerabilities. The space domain is divided into three segments.
1-56. The three discrete, but related space domain segments are:
 The ground segment—consists of ground-based facilities and equipment supporting command
and control of space assets, ground-based processing equipment, Earth terminals, user equipment,
SSA sensors, and the interconnectivity between the facilities in which this equipment is housed.
 The space segment—the operating area corresponding with the physical space domain.
 The link segment—consists of signals connecting ground and space segments through the EMS.
This normally includes telemetry, tracking, and signals necessary for controlling the spacecraft

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 1-11

Chapter 1

and may also include satellite payload signals such as the SATCOM signal enabling
communication between points on the ground, or the PNT signal enabling navigation.
1-57. Military activities are conducted in the space domain to achieve national security objectives. Space
operations are generally supported in some way by satellites in orbit around the Earth. The space domain is
interrelated with the other domains and properly integrating these complex functions with the other military
activities is critical for successful operations.

ORBITAL CHARACTERISTICS
1-58. The unique operating parameters of sensors on space-based assets are a function of orbital
characteristics, not the sensors. A space-based asset may have frequent revisit rates or long dwell times, but
never both. Different orbits are conducive to different missions and support different operations. Inclination
is the degrees an orbital plane is angled relative to the equatorial plane—an orbit with zero inclination orbits
over the equator. Higher inclinations provide more northern/southern ground coverage. Satellite orbits are
grouped into general categories defined by their altitude above the Earth and the shape of the orbit. The four
primary orbit types are briefly discussed and illustrated in figure 1-2.
 Low Earth orbit (LEO)—up to 1,600 kilometers (km) (1,000 miles) above the surface of the Earth.
Satellites in this orbit are close to the Earth and move quickly relative to the ground.
 Medium Earth orbit (known as MEO)—any orbital asset above LEO and below geosynchronous
Earth orbit (GEO). This orbit is most frequently associated with GPS, which operates at
approximately 19,300 km (12,000 miles) above Earth’s surface. Satellites in this orbit can provide
SATCOM with less signal delay, higher capacities, and may support resilient operations.
 GEO—an orbit approximately 37,000 km (22,300 miles) above the Earth where a satellite circles
the Earth once every 24 hours, keeping pace with the Earth’s rotation. A geosynchronous orbit
with inclination other than zero will trace a figure 8 over to the surface of the Earth, centered on
the equator. A geosynchronous orbit with inclination equal to zero is called a geostationary orbit.
This orbit hovers over one point on the surface of the Earth, directly over the equator.
 Highly elliptical orbit. These orbits are oval-shaped with the Earth offset to one end. A satellite’s
altitude typically ranges from 1,000 km (600 miles) above the Earth at perigee (point closest to
Earth), to about 40,000 km (25,000 miles) at apogee (point farthest from Earth) where it has a
long dwell time over a large area. The highly elliptical orbit is inclined from the equatorial plane
so a satellite may dwell for long periods over latitudes where GEO do not have coverage.

Figure 1-2: Illustration of basic satellite orbits

1-12 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations Overview

1-59. As an example, if the Earth were represented by a basketball, most LEO would be within one inch of
the ball. A medium Earth orbit would be centered approximately 14.5 inches above the ball, and GEO would
be 27 inches above the ball.
1-60. While unfettered access to satellites in Earth orbit provides a tremendous advantage for information
dissemination and collection, there are limitations. Spacecraft follow strict motion and orbital mechanic laws
of physics. Revisit rates, coverage area, and dwell time over areas targeted for observation are functions of
spacecraft orbits. For example, a highly elliptical orbit yields a long dwell time over large areas but is
designed for only partial hemisphere access, while a LEO provides global access but a short access time.
Generally, only minor changes to orbits are made after initial orbit insertion due to finite fuels onboard.
1-61. Space-based sensors are vital to all phases of operations, and particularly in non-contiguous areas.
Theater downlink and direct downlink are fundamental to timely, assured, and responsive support to the
ground maneuver force. Space-based collection assets operate within established orbital paths. Changing the
orbit requires time and the use of a limited propellant supply. Space-based assets are susceptible to threat
denial and deception practices. Table 1-1 lists the characteristics or each orbit type.
Table 1-1. Characteristics of satellite orbits
Type Description Advantages Disadvantages Uses
Low Earth • Circular shaped • Near Earth – high • Small coverage • Surveillance
Orbit • Earth’s surface up resolution and area over Earth • Reconnaissance
to ~1,600 km signal strength surface
• Weather collection
(1,000 miles) above • Limited time over
• Human space flight
Earth Earth’s surface
(moves quickly)
Medium • Circular shaped • Stable orbit • Highest radiation • Positioning,
Earth • Between ~1,600- • Less signal level environment navigation, and
Orbit 35,400 km (1,000- latency • Higher capacity timing
22,000 miles) • Communication
above Earth
• GPS ~19,300 km
(12,000 miles)
above Earth
Geo- • Circular shaped • Continuous • Far from Earth – • Communication
synchrono • ~37,000 km coverage over resolution and • Surveillance
us Earth (23,000 miles) specific area signal limitations
• Reconnaissance
Orbit above Earth • Coverage nearly • Easier to jam
• Weather collection
hemispheric • Signal latency
• Missile warning
Highly • Oval shaped • Long dwell time • Continuous • Communication
Elliptical • Perigee: ~ 1000 km over a large area coverage requires over high latitudes
Orbit (600 miles) • Coverage of high multiple satellites • Scientific
• Apogee:~40,000 North or South • Surveillance
km (25,000 miles) latitudes
• Reconnaissance
GPS - Global Positioning System km – kilometers
1-62. A related limitation is predictability. The position of satellites in LEO may be accurately predicted.
Predictions of satellite locations based on current orbit characteristics can be made weeks in advance. This
predictability makes space-based information collection susceptible to camouflage, denial, and deception.
Soldiers can use this information to their benefit when dealing with enemy capabilities—not considering
such limitations could lead to unanticipated results. In addition to these limitations, many spacecraft are high-
demand, low-density assets and may not be able to satisfy all demands. It is the responsibility of the space
operations officer to ensure this information is known by the staff during mission planning.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 1-13

Chapter 1

ARMY SPACE CORE COMPETENCIES

1-63. A core competency is an essential and enduring capability that a branch or an organization provides
to Army operations (ADP 1-01). An organization may have multiple core competencies, the purpose of
which, is to provide a clear statement of what an organization does in broad, easily understood terms.
1-64. The Army core competencies for space-forces are the attributes that bring strengths, advantages, and
contributions to the Army. Army space core competencies serve as a frame of reference by articulating the
responsibilities of all Army space forces and their overarching roles. The core competencies provide the
foundation for Army space tasks related to those functions. Army space forces must understand and excel at
the Army space core competencies. They are used to organize and develop training, assist in managing the
Army space force, and are an integral part of space doctrine. The three Army space core competencies are:
 Integrate space capabilities;
 Deliver space effects; and
 Employ space enablers.

1-65. Integrate space capabilities. To operate in complex environments, the Army depends greatly on
assuring its forces have access to vital space capabilities. To assure this access, Army space forces will:
 Plan, develop, acquire, and integrate Army, joint, coalition, and commercial space required
capabilities (excluding intelligence capabilities) across the warfighting functions to enable the full
range of military operations.
 Synchronize space control operations, NAVWAR operations, and integrated joint special
technical operations with lethal and non-lethal operations such as electronic warfare and
cyberspace operations to achieve desired operational effects.
 Ensure the space architecture is integrated in a manner that provides resiliency in a D3SOE.
 Prepare and train all echelons of Army forces to work through a D3SOE.
 Plan and integrate Army space capabilities to support homeland operations.
 Integrate space capabilities with cyberspace networks to deliver and defend critical mission data.
 Examples include SSE operation planning, ARSST integration, NAVWAR planning, and fusion
of space operations, cyberspace, and electronic warfare.
1-66. Deliver space effects. To generate and deliver effects that achieve overmatch across the warfighting
functions, Army space forces will:
 Conduct space control operations to deny adversaries assured access to space capabilities.
 Conduct coordinated NAVWAR operations to deny PNT advantages to adversaries.
 Coordinate with integrated joint special technical operations to ensure all non-lethal effects
supporting joint operations are synchronized.
 Conduct DSC to protect assured access to space capabilities.
 Create effects across multiple domains by leveraging all space capabilities.
 Examples include: pace control and NAVWAR operations.

1-67. Employ space enablers. To support Army and joint forces with space capabilities, Army space
forces employ space-enabler capabilities to:
 Exercise operational and technical control of space assets and high altitude payloads.
 Launch and provide platform control of Army space assets and high altitude systems which
employ tactically focused payloads.
 Exploit space architectures to provide space-enabled operations for mission-essential systems.
 Examples include: JTAGS, WSOCs, and joint FFT.

1-14 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Chapter 2
Space Operational Environment
The Army uses space-based capabilities to support its dominance in decisive actions. Space
capabilities are critical elements of Army operations. Moreover, the need for the U.S. Army to
accomplish space operations is firmly established in policy and practice. Many space capabilities
are well integrated into Army operations. Army space operations supports critical components of
offensive, defensive, and stability or defense support of civil authorities operations. Army space
operations enable all Army warfighting functions.

This chapter describes how Army space operations directly support and contribute to joint
operations and the unified land operations. It also describes how Army space operations help enable
the tenets of unified land operations.

SPACE DOMAIN IS A WARFIGHTING DOMAIN

2-1. The space domain supports and enables all other domains—it is interdependent with the air, land, and
maritime domains, and interconnected with the cyberspace domain. Space operations are fundamental to all
domains. Army space operations are heavily influenced by understanding the constraints, limitations, and
operational needs of the land component users. Army space operations includes all aspects of planning,
preparation, integration, and execution.
2-2. The execution of Army space operations contributes to, supports, and enables Army operations.
Modern warfare has forced the transition of space operations from merely an enabler to a warfighting domain
prepared to assure space operations through all phases of conflict. Space operations enable force
responsiveness and create potential opportunities for the Army, joint, and multinational partners. Space
operations defends our space capabilities against aggressive counterspace operations of others.
2-3. Army thinking about space operations has evolved. The Army no longer regards the space domain as
a permissive environment where it only considers natural factors during mission planning. When operating
in the space domain, the space planner has to consider hazards (conditions), threats (hostile actions), and
vulnerabilities (system characteristics) which may impact the mission. Army space operations are focused
on ensuring hazards, threats, and vulnerabilities are mitigated as much as possible.
2-4. The space domain optimizes the use of functions such as PNT, beyond line of sight communications,
information collection and dissemination, early warning, and environmental monitoring. Activities in the
space domain enable freedom of action for operations in all other domains. Operations in the other domains
may create effects in and through the space domain. Operating in the space domain grants significant
operational advantage such as beyond line of sight communications, increased situational understanding, and
increased navigational and targeting accuracy. Operations in all domains are positively impacted by access
to the space domain.
2-5. As with other operational areas, when deliberate fires (such as electromagnetic or directed energy) are
directed into or out of the space domain, the fires should be coordinated between the affected combatant
commands if time permits. By honoring the boundaries of the space domain, combatant commanders help to
preserve SSA, spacecraft life span, and space system performance. This facilitates freedom of action in the
space domain and improves support to terrestrial operations. It is important to note missile defense operations
transiting though the space domain are not pre-coordinated due to the short-notice self-defense actions
required to defeat enemy missile attacks. Refer to FM 3-27 for more information on ballistic missile warning
and defense.
2-6. The Army executes space operations and contributes to establishing and maintaining space superiority
consistent with the needs of unified land operations. The Army continually incorporates existing and

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-1

Chapter 2

emerging space domain capabilities and effects to further improve the effectiveness of its operations. The
Army’s ability to protect space forces through space control and countering enemy capabilities being used
for purposes hostile to U.S. national interests yields military power and contributes to space superiority.
2-7. The Army is more lethal when enabled by space capabilities and it endeavors to preserve its combat
power. The Army leverages the advantages of space capabilities and counterspace effects to accomplish a
wide variety of missions.
2-8. Information operations are the integrated employment, during military operations, of information-
related capabilities in concert with other lines of operation to influence, disrupt, corrupt, or usurp the decision-
making of adversaries and potential adversaries while protecting our own (JP 3-13). Space operations support
information operations by using the space capabilities. Space-enable information operations uses capabilities
such as SATCOM, PNT, space-based surveillance and reconnaissance, missile warning, and environmental
monitoring.
2-9. Space capabilities are a significant force multiplier when integrated with joint operations. Space
operations enhance many areas including situational understanding, fires, movement, cyberspace
electromagnetic activities, electronic warfare, information operations, protection, and many other
capabilities. Space operations aid high-tempo, noncontiguous, dispersed, and decentralized operations across
the range of military operations.

THE SPACE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

2-10. An OE is a composite of the conditions, circumstances, and influences that affect the employment of
capabilities and bear on the decisions of the commander (JP 3-0). An OE includes and encompasses physical
areas and factors of the air, land, maritime, space, and cyberspace domains. An OE for any specific operation
not only includes isolated conditions of interacting variables that exist within a specific area of operations,
but also interconnected influences from a global or regional perspective, such as the political and economic
influences that impact conditions and operations. Defining the OE results in the identification of significant
threat characteristics which may affect friendly and enemy operations.
2-11. An OE is neither domain specific nor a Service component; however, there are domain-centric
considerations that contribute to an overall OE understanding. While Army space operations are most
effective when integrated into operations, it is necessary to isolate elements of a space OE to determine what
the variables are and how they may be integrated into the larger battlefield OE.
2-12. A critical challenge for commanders, staffs, and unified action partners is creating shared
understanding of their OE, an operation’s purpose, problems, and approaches to solving problems (ADP 6-
0). A Space operations officers’ insights and understanding of how space operations enables joint and Army
operations across the range of military operations are critical to developing a comprehensive space OE that
contributes to a shared understanding of the overall OE. Space operations officers provide a foundation for
developing shared situational understanding of the overall OE across all domains, improving awareness and
understanding of friendly forces’ dependency on space capabilities, improving understanding of capabilities
and limitations for friendly forces and the adversaries, and highlighting other conditions of the OE. The
resulting understanding of the OE should be linked to the commander’s common understanding through the
warfighting functions.
2-13. Analysis of the broad aspects of the space OE in terms of the operational variables provides relevant
information senior commanders and their staff’s use to understand, visualize, and describe the OE.
Operational variables are a comprehensive set of information categories used to describe an operational
environment. The operational variables are political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure,
physical environment, and time (known as PMESII-PT).
2-14. Upon receipt of a warning order or mission, Army commanders filter relevant information from the
operational variables and narrow their focus using the six mission variables. Mission variables are the
categories of specific information needed to conduct operations. The mission variables are mission, enemy,
terrain and weather, troops and support available, time available, and civil considerations (known as
METT-TC). These variables are used by space planners during analysis to facilitate understanding.

2-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Operational Environment

2-15. When viewing an OE, it is important to take a holistic approach and identify friendly, neutral, and
hostile actors. An OE includes the interacting variables within a specific area of operations as well as
connected regional or global influences, such as politics and economics. Each commander’s OE is a sub-set
of a higher commander’s OE. This is particularly important to space operations due to its global reach and
tactical impact.
2-16. Understanding an OE is an on-going, iterative process that continues throughout an operation. The
iterative steps are critical for a constantly evolving discipline like space operations. An OE consists of many
interrelated variables and sub-variables, as well as the relationships and interactions among those variables
and sub-variables. The space OE during planning will be different from the space OE at the start of operations,
and will likely be significantly different from the space OE at the end of operations.

CHANGING NATURE OF AN OPERATING ENVIRONMENT

2-17. An OE is not static but continually evolves. This evolution results from opposing forces and actors—
organizations and individuals—interacting and their ability to learn and adapt. As actors take action within
an OE, the OE changes. It is critically important commanders and staff should not view actors as static; they
constantly change over time. Actors may become less or more hostile over time. Commanders, staffs, and
Soldiers must continuously reassess an OE for changing conditions. The complex and dynamic nature of an
OE may make attribution and determining the relationship between cause and effect difficult.
2-18. Fundamental to mission success is the ability for space operations officers to anticipate and analyze
potential space-related problems and develop solutions. Based on their understanding and analysis of a
problem, space operations officers select and apply the right solutions to perform required tasks. Further
adding to the challenge, the space OE remains dynamic throughout all phases of conflict.
2-19. Army space operators understand unified land operations to provide a space-focus to planning and
analysis applicable to unified land operations. It is up to Army space operations officers on the staff to make
sure the space OE is understood by the staff and space capabilities are planned and integrated into unified
land operations in support of joint combined arms operations.
2-20. Commanders must seek opportunities for exploiting success. As the environment changes,
continuous analysis of the operational variables help reveal opportunities, such as greater cooperation among
the local population of a town or the ability to advance forces along a previously unsecured route. To exploit
opportunities successfully, commanders and staffs should thoroughly understand and appreciate the
application of the operational variables.

OPERATIONAL VARIABLES
2-21. The OE is described in terms of eight operational variables. The framework for analysis conducted
for any OE should always consist of all eight variables. The operational variables are fundamental to
developing a comprehensive understanding of an OE. Operational variables are those aspects of the OE which
differ from one operational area to another and affect operations. Operational variables describe both the
military aspects of an OE and the population’s influence on it—they help improve situational understanding.
2-22. Analysis of each variable, applied through the lens of space operations, contributes to a
comprehensive understanding of the OE and how the OE may affect mission operations. By applying the
operational variables to a specific OE, the space planner, in coordination with other planners, gains a holistic
and detailed understanding of the OE. Analysis continues systemically to identify existing and potential
relationships among aspects of each of the operational variables. A brief description, along with space-related
considerations for each operational variable follows.

Political
2-23. Describes the distribution of responsibility and power at all levels of governance – may be formally
constituted authorities, informal, or covert political powers. Covers everything from recognized state leader
to the tribal leader in a local village. Conducting analysis using the space capabilities framework may reveal
significant insights and understanding of the leaders, population, and OE.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-3

Chapter 2

 SSA
o Attribution of actions and liability of incidents.
o Reentering objects and notifications - understanding size of the reentering object (is it likely
to survive) and where it will likely impact.
 PNT—interruption of GPS or other GNSS signals may have an impact on political stability due
to its wide use, including:
o Timing signals are used by allied and threat nations’ militaries and commercial sectors such
as banking, stock markets, power grids, and computer networks.
o Positioning information supports targeting accuracy, troop movement and maneuver, and
other operations supported by tagging, tracking, and location.
o Navigation information keeps logistics and supply chain management aware of resources,
fosters agile decision-making to rerouting supplies when interrupted by inclement weather or
attacks. Secondary and tertiary routes are more quickly developed to help facilitate deliveries
with minimal delays. Used by shipping to improve location accuracy for shipping lanes.
 Space control—helps political considerations by providing attribution of related actions and
activities.
 SATCOM—interruptions of SATCOM may have an impact on political stability.
o Political restraints placed on Army or joint operations regarding use of specific frequencies
which might impact space capabilities and overall mission.
o Information operations.
o Internet availability for computer networks for military (NIPRNET and SIPRNET), business,
and commercial or social use.
 Missile warning and defense—provides protection and warning indications for political
considerations.
o Attribution of actions from foreign missile launches and state involvement which drives
public opinion and political authorities.
o Confirmation of events and battle damage assessments.
 Environmental monitoring information is used by space operations to provide potential impacts
to SATCOM and PNT-dependent operations as well as SSA and missile warning indications
which could have wide-ranging political implications.
 Space-based surveillance and reconnaissance provides information which may have significant
impact on political decisions.

Military
2-24. Explores the military and or paramilitary capabilities of all actors, including friendly, neutral, and
enemy in a given OE. Space planners should consider how unified action partners use space capabilities and
how proficient or knowledgeable other forces are at integrating space capabilities into the mission. Space
operations should consider the ability of enemy military to affect mission operations by placing Army, joint,
and unified action partners in a D3SOE. They should consider the dependency of enemy military on
SATCOM, PNT, space control, and missile warning capabilities.
 SSA—operations within the space domain are continuously being contested. The Army and joint
forces require on-going awareness and assessment of the changing space environment, the
changing threats, and the impacts to the forces. Attribution of actions drives military operations
and assures responses are focused against the actual threats.
 PNT—interruption of GPS or other GNSS signals may have an impact on mission operations:
o Timing signals are used to synchronize mission operations, radios, computer networks, and
many other information technology equipment.
o Positioning information supports targeting accuracy, troop movement and maneuver, and
other operations supported by tagging, tracking, and location.
o Navigation information keeps troop movement and maneuver precise and accurate.

2-4 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Operational Environment

 Space control—used to protect joint and allied space capabilities while denying space capabilities
to the adversary, as situations require. The DOD employ a variety of measures to help assure the
use of the space domain for all responsible parties. Consistent with the inherent right of self-
defense, deters others from interference and attack, and defends our space systems. NAVWAR
allows the Army to take deliberate defensive and offensive actions to assure Army and joint forces
have access to PNT.
 SATCOM—interruption of SATCOM will have a direct and immediate impact on all military
operations. Interruption of a signal can cause significant degradation to all mission operations.
 Satellite operations—access to military satellites is dependent upon transmission control and
payload control so military operations get a reliable satellite signal, and know the data is verified
legitimate.
 Missile warning and defense—provides warning indications, protection for troops, and
confirmation of events for battle damage assessment. Enables attribution of actions of state
involvement and specific missile launches which provides additional characteristics of threat
actors’ capabilities.
 Environmental monitoring information can provide significant, wide-ranging impacts due to
actual or possible interruptions to SATCOM, PNT, SSA, missile warning indications, force
protection, and overall on mission operations.
 Space-based surveillance and reconnaissance supports information which may have significant
impact on military, commercial, and civil space sectors.

Economic
2-25. Encompasses individual and group behaviors related to producing, distributing, and consuming
resources. Does the village have a high unemployment rate that makes it easy for the enemy to coerce
villagers to perform tasks for pay or other benefits? Space operations should consider financial means
available to purchase space capabilities from a third party that may provide asymmetric advantages. Space
capabilities may be helpful by increasing interaction with locals or harmful as may be the case with AD
capabilities.
 SSA—understanding adversary intent and the stability of the host nation’s economic community
contributes to the joint force commander’s situational understanding of natural resources and
likelihood host nation citizens support friendly actions. Strong economies foster strong citizenship
and help deter insurgent actors.
 PNT—the global economy has numerous dependencies on reliable GPS signals. Interruption of
GPS or other GNSS signals may have an impact on economic stability. Timing signals are used
by many nations’ commercial sectors—for banking, stock markets, power grids, news media and
telecommunications capabilities including cellular networks, computer networks and cloud
computing, agricultural sectors for large-scale farming, construction sectors for precise survey,
and transportation sectors for navigation and accurate delivery forecasts.
 SATCOM—interruptions of SATCOM may have an impact on political stability, economic
stability,
o Interruptions to SATCOM may have economic impacts on commercial sector from lack of
economic news and transfer of monetary funds.
o Internet availability for computer networks for military (NIPRNET and SIPRNET), business,
and commercial or social use.
 Missile warning and defense—provides warning indications and protection opportunities. A
missile impact could cause large scale destruction of critical infrastructure which could cripple
portions or an entire economic structure.

Social
2-26. Describes the cultural, religious, and ethnic makeup within an OE and the beliefs, values, customs,
and behaviors of society members. Consider who the influential people are in the village—for example, are
they religious leaders, tribal leaders, warlords, criminal bosses, prominent families, or even teenagers with

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-5

Chapter 2

smart phones. Space operations should consider access to social media and world-wide influences which may
garner support or drive civil unrest.
 SSA
o Attribution of actions and liability of incidents, such as with the Iridium 33 and Kosmos-
2251 collision.
o Reentering objects and notifications - understanding size of the reentering object (is it likely
to survive) and where it will likely impact.
 PNT—interruption of GPS or other GNSS signals may have an impact on social stability due to
its wide use, including:
o Disruption to timing signals used for banking, power grids, and computer networks may have
unforeseen or negative consequences on social network used by unified action partners.
o Navigation capabilities keeps traffic moving smoothly. Disruption to these capabilities may
have negative consequences—including traffic jams, deadly accidents, and high incidents of
missed work—when attributed to the specific actions of a military may be used to support or
erode social attitudes.
 SATCOM—interruptions of SATCOM may have an impact on political stability.
o Political restraints placed on Army or joint operations regarding use of specific frequencies
which might impact space capabilities and overall mission.
o Political restraints placed on civilian population regarding specific frequencies for military
use—including television, radio, internet, and wireless device access—which might impact
public opinion of the local population and support for military action.
o Information operations.
o Internet availability for computer networks for military (NIPRNET and SIPRNET), business,
and commercial or social use.
 Missile warning and defense—provides protection and warning indications for political
considerations.
o Attribution of actions from foreign missile launches and state involvement which drives
public opinion and political authorities.
o Confirmation of events and battle damage assessments.

Information
2-27. Describes the nature, scope, characteristics, and effects of individuals, organizations, and systems
that collect, process, disseminate, or act on information. How much access to news media or the internet do
the local leaders, influential persona, and general population have? Space operations should consider how
access to internet and world-wide influences may be increased or decreased using SATCOM.
 SSA
o Attribution of actions and liability of incidents such as with the Iridium 33 and Kosmos-2251
collision.
o Reentering objects and notifications—understanding size of the reentering object (is it likely
to survive) and where it will likely impact.
 SATCOM—interruptions of SATCOM may have an impact on political stability.
o Political restraints placed on Army or joint operations regarding use of specific frequencies
which might impact space capabilities and overall mission.
o Information operations.
o Internet availability for computer networks for military (NIPRNET and SIPRNET), business,
and commercial or social use.

Infrastructure
2-28. Composed of the basic facilities, services, and installations needed for the functioning of a
community or society. This may include the functionality of electrical generators and similar utility systems.

2-6 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Operational Environment

 SSA— intelligence outputs such as maps and knowledge of specific critical infrastructure builds
a picture of critical assets to protect and likely targets.
 PNT—interruption of GPS or other GNSS signals may have an impact on the infrastructure
stability due to timing signals which are used by commercial sectors such as banking, stock
markets, power grids, computer networks, and many other commercial endeavors.
 Space operations should consider how commercial unclassified maps may help determine
remaining infrastructure or how GPS may be able to help guide displaced people through the
rubble of destroyed neighborhoods.

Physical Environment
2-29. Includes the geography, man-made structures, climate, weather, and hazards in the area of operations.
What types of terrain or weather conditions in the area of operations favor enemy operations?
 Space operations should consider the possibility of GPS interference and SATCOM obscurra due
to tall buildings and mountains, as well as the impact to missile warning indications and reporting.

Time
2-30. Describes the timing and duration of activities, events, or conditions within an OE, as well as how
the timing and duration are perceived by various actors in the OE. At what times are people likely to congest
roads or conduct activities that provide a cover for hostile operations?
 Space operations help commanders and staffs understand their dependencies on GPS. It enables
precision targeting with reduced collateral damage. GPS enables FFT, increased tactical operating
ranges, rapid maneuver, unmanned aerial system, surveillance and reconnaissance support for
situational understanding, and many other functions. Precision timing enhances synchronized
tactical digital networks, communications, and wide area networking capabilities.

MISSION VARIABLES
2-31. Commanders and staffs require a mission analysis focused on their specific situation. The tactical
echelons translate the operational variables identified by the operational headquarters into the mission
variables. Mission variables are the categories of relevant military information used for planning operations
as part of the MDMP. Mission analysis uses the six Army mission variables of mission, enemy, terrain and
weather, troops and support available, time available, and civil consideration.
2-32. Commanders and staffs use the mission variables to filter the broader scope of operational variables
into information that directly affects a specific mission—the information staffs need to conduct an operation
and commanders need to exercise command and control. Mission variables refine the understanding of a
situation and describe the characteristics of a specific area of operation within the OE. Space planners use
the mission variables to identify critical space-related information applicable to mission planning. These
provide the baseline for selecting the right capabilities to be used. Knowing the mission, threat, and OE
allows commanders to identify and plan for the optimal capability package.
2-33. An effective mission analysis considers the potential impact space capabilities have within an OE.
The Army space planners participates in planning actions to help form the problem statement, mission
statement, planning guidance, initial commander’s critical information requirements, and essential elements
of friendly information. Failure to identify or misidentify the effect mission variables might have on
operations can hinder decision making and result in the development of an ineffective battle plan.

ELECTROMAGNETIC OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

2-34. Military operations are complicated by operations dependent on the EMS. The EMS is congested and
military operations are contested which creates both opportunities and vulnerabilities requiring diligence to
ensure operations are not compromised. The electromagnetic operational environment (EMOE) is the
background electromagnetic environment and the friendly, neutral, and adversarial electromagnetic order of
battle within the electromagnetic area of influence associated with a given operational area (JP 6-01). The
need for military forces to have assured access to, and use of the EMS drives the conditions of the EMOE.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-7

Chapter 2

2-35. All mission operations, military support functions, civil sectors, and private organizations are
dependent upon the EMS. Some of the functions and operations dependent on the EMS include but are not
limited to:
 Space operations, intelligence, cyberspace, electronic warfare, signal, and information operations;
 Command and control;
 Maneuvering forces;
 Targeting and attack;
 Communications and data transmission;
 Civil infrastructure control.

2-36. The increase in portability and affordability of sophisticated electronic equipment guarantees the
EMOE will continue to expand, change, and influence how wars are fought. Commanders must shape the
EMOE to ensure friendly forces can operate while denying the same privilege to the adversary, when
necessary. Commanders should understand the EMOE is a sebset of the overall OE—it permeates all
environments, and it drives mission operations more intrinsically than tanks, mortars, and bullets.
2-37. Maneuver in the EMS is similar to the physical domains, but more complex. For instance, maneuver
in the air domain requires three-dimensional positioning and time, while EMS maneuver requires the ability
of military forces to adapt or adjust EMS operating parameters (e.g., frequency, power, modulation) to gain
an advantage over the enemyo (JP 6-01).
2-38. EMOE is a unique maneuver environment upon which all five warfighting domains depend.
Commanders must focus achieving control of, and freedom of maneuver within the EMS. The military’s
dependency on the EMS is a reality of the modern battlefield. The electromagnetic environment (EME) is
the resulting product of the power and time distribution, in various frequency ranges, of the radiated or
conducted electromagnetic emission levels encountered by a military force, system, or platform when
performing its assigned mission in its intended operational environment (JP 3-13.1).

FREQUENCIES
2-39. The EMS is the range of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation from zero to infinity. It is divided
into 26 bands, each designated by an alphabetically designate bands (JP 3-13.1). The EMS crosses all
domains, and it provides a vital link between the cyberspace and space domains.
2-40. Frequency band designation are often confusing as the military, the International Telecommunication
Union, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and traditional bands use the same designation
to represent different frequency ranges. These differences cause confusion as bands often overlap the
boundaries between two frequency segments. Refer to table 2-1 for a comparison of bandwidth frequencies.
Table 2-1. Bandwidth comparison
ITU Traditional IEEE
Designation
ITU Frequency Traditional Frequency IEEE Frequency
Used in
Band Range Band Range Band Range
FM 3-14
(gigahertz) (gigahertz) (gigahertz)
Narrowband UHF 0.3 – 3 UHF .3 – 3 UHF 0.3-1
L 0.39-1.55 L 1-2
S 1.55-4.20 S 2-4
Wideband SHF 3 – 30 SHF 3 – 30
C 4.20-5.75 C 4-8
X 5.75-10.90 X 8-12
Ku 10.90-22.0 Ku 12-18
K 10.90-36.0 K 18-26.5
Protected band EHF 30 - 300 EHF 30 – 300
Ka 22.0-36.0 Ka 26.5-40
EHF – extremely high frequency IEEE – Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
SHF – super-high frequency ITU – International Telecommunication Union
UHF – ultrahigh frequency NOTE: Band letter designations are not abbreviations.

2-8 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Operational Environment

2-41. The frequency band influences the throughput capacity and amount of protection provided to the
communications system, such as interference, anti-jam capability, probability of interception, and probability
of detection capabilities. Military SATCOM uses a range of frequencies to meet user requirements at all
levels of conflict. Ultrahigh frequency and super-high frequency bands lend themselves to supporting
SATCOM in benign and degraded environments, whereas, extremely high frequency lends itself to providing
greater protection in highly contested or nuclear environments.

CONTESTED SPACE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

2-42. It is understood all warfare is contested. As warfare has evolved, the OE has expanded into all
domains. Battles are waged in an OE where physical forces, capabilities, and effects are dependent on the
EMS and characterized by a contested EME.
2-43. A contested EME applies to a wide variety of operations, including, but not limited to space
operations, cyberspace, electronic warfare, missile warning, terrestrial and space weather, lethal and non-
lethal fires, intelligence, and information operations. A contested EME may affect operations in one or
multiple domains. Operating within a contested EME has the potential to severely impact operations across
all missions.
2-44. A permissive environment is an OE in which host country military and law enforcement agencies
have control, as well as the intent and capability to assist operations that a unit intends to conduct (JP 3-0).
Permissive environments identify circumstances where adversaries show negligible domain influence and
minimal effects to friendly operations. The U.S. has been operating almost exclusively in a permissive space
domain for most of the last half century. Today, conducting space operations entirely in a permissive
environment is rare.
2-45. A hostile environment is an OE in which host government forces, whether opposed to or receptive to
operations that a unit intends to conduct, do not have control of the territory and population in the intended
operational area (JP 3-0). Hostile environments describe circumstances where threat actors deliberately
exhibit unfavorable influence upon one or more domains producing effects which impact friendly operations.
2-46. A contested space domain creates a hostile environment where threat actors exert persistent,
successful influence on the space domain or EMS producing pronounced effects on space operations. Like
other domains, operations within the space domain are constantly being contested. A contested EME may
affect operations across all domains, and impact active and passive measures.
2-47. Threat actors have developed capabilities which can contest the space domain and attack the ground,
link, and space segments of SATCOM, PNT, missile warning, space-based surveillance and reconnaissance,
environmental monitoring and other electromagnetic envrionment efforts. These attacks can have significant
impact on all mission operations, and can significantly disrupt timelines and resources required to accomplish
the mission. When operating in a contested space environment, commanders must consider defensive efforts
and planning for when to request the use of offensive space operations. It is likely the enemy will use
counterspace capabilities regularly and often as they are inexpensive to obtain, easy to produce, and often
difficult to locate. Thus, an enemy can contest the space environment to degrade a window of opportunity
during an attempt to penetrate enemy defense.
2-48. The space planner must understand the system strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of joint and
partner nations when considering the usage and integration of their space capabilities. They must have a
knowledge of the threats to those systems and understanding what steps can be taken to prevent or limit an
adversary’s access to those vulnerabilities. This understanding assists in the assessment of the operational
risk and potential mitigation measures for the joint force if space capabilities are degraded or lost.

ANTIACCESS AND AREA DENIAL STRATEGY

2-49. A contested environment is often characterized by an impaired ability to conduct operations due to
the employment of A2 and AD strategies. Generally, A2 affects movement to a theater while AD affects
movement within a theater.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-9

Chapter 2

2-50. Space operations may contribute solutions to counter theater A2 and AD threats to allow freedom of
maneuver through enemy defenses to gain, maintain, and dominate control across all domains. Examples of
how space operations help counter A2 and AD strategies include:
 Space-based assets usually provide initial notification of short range ballistic and cruise missiles
fired from distant naval and air platforms which give Soldiers sufficient time to don protective
gear and take cover.
 Space-based assets help identify long-range enemy air defenses used to challenge airspace for
both tactical operations and strategic airlift, thereby contesting air superiority.
2-51. The Army has taken an increased role in suppressing enemy air defenses as it becomes increasingly
tougher for air operations to gain air superiority against peer competitors when trying to gain entry to a hostile
environment. Army space operations are a piece of the multifunction approach to countering A2 and AD.
The U.S. military dominance in all domains will be contested by peer and regional powers and the Army may
not enjoy the permissive advantages of forward basing it enjoyed in the past.
2-52. A2 is the effects of systems employed by a threat actor which challenge the employment of joint
forces during expeditionary and sustained operations to gain access close to enemy terrain. The adversaries
intent is to make liberation of these areas too costly in terms of military and political resources, and erode
influence, regional and global will, and influence public opinion. AD describes a threat actor’s strategy to
deny friendly forces superiority in one or more domain, which is essential to effectively conducting rapid
and decisive tactical maneuver on land.
2-53. An A2 and AD strategy implemented in one domain or location may have little or no effect on other
domains or other locations. Threat efforts may cause one component to operate in a hostile environment,
while another component is able to operate in a permissive environment. Conversely, an A2 and AD strategy
implemented in one domain may have detrimental effect on operations across all domains and in other
locations. Commanders should be aware of hostile EME actions which may only have limited effects.
2-54. The Army will face opponents who have developed strategies by learning from past conflicts. The
most prominent anticipated strategy expected from an enemy is A2 and AD. These strategies focus on
denying unified action partners the use of traditional staging and force development models by restricting
access to key geographical areas and force-generating assets. In many instances, the use of ballistic missiles,
cruise missiles, and unmanned aerial systems are a key component of an enemies’ strategy.
2-55. Contested access to and use of the global commons—those portions of the Earth outside national
jurisdiction all state actors have rightful access to—will significantly complicate military plans and
operations. A threat actor may employ conventional or hybrid capabilities as part of an AD strategy, including
the use of conventional integrated air-defense systems, long range rockets, and cruise missiles.
2-56. Adversaries may attempt to create one or multiple effects against joint and unified action partners.
Army forces must be prepared to conduct operations against A2 and AD actions. D3SOE is the result of a
threat actor implementing A2 and AD strategies against U.S. and unified action partners and it is the most
recognizable impact to space operations from threat actors.

DENIED, DEGRADED, AND DISRUPTED SPACE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

2-57. Army and joint operations use space-based capabilities delivered to all domains via the EMS. The
threat to Army and joint operations from a contested EME may create vulnerabilities which makes contesting
space capabilities attractive to threat actors. Army space operations must remain responsive and flexible to
commanders’ needs and stay agile in response to the efforts of threat actors to place joint forces in a D3SOE.
2-58. D3SOE is the Army space operations portion of the larger contested EME. A D3SOE may affect
operations in any one or more domains, and may impact active and passive measures. Mission critical systems
operate in the radio, microwave, infrared, ultraviolet, and x-ray portions of the spectrum, all of which are
subject to interferrence.
2-59. Army forces must be prepared to conduct operations in and through a D3SOE. Denied, degraded,
and disrupted are used in a different context than they are for OSC, but the definitions are consistent with the
usage in JP 3-14 and described below.

2-10 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Operational Environment

 Deny—temporary total elimination of the use of space capabilities, effects, or associated linkages.
 Degrade—permanent impairment (either partial or total) of the use of space capabilities, effects,
or associated linkages usually with physical damage.
 Disrupt—a temporary impairment that weakens or diminishes the use of space capabilities,
effects, or associated linkages upon which the Army, joint forces, and allies depend.
2-60. The space operating environment is harsh. Interference may come from hazards or threat actors.
 Threat actors may attempt to create one or multiple effects against joint and unified action
partners. They include individuals, groups of individuals, paramilitary or military forces, nation-
states, or national alliances and their actions. Possible impacts to mission from D3SOE should be
taken into account during all phases of planning cycles.
 Hazards are not threats. They are usually predictable and preventable, and may be reduced through
effective risk management efforts. Natural phenomena may create hazardous conditions which
cause damage, destroy life and vital resources, or prevent mission accomplishment. Naturally
occurring environmental factors are hazards which may negatively impact the proper function of
a satellite, an associated ground-system, or the EMS and must be considered during the planning
process.
2-61. D3SOE applies to both physical and electromagnetic conditions, circumstances, and influences
which affect the employment of space capabilities. Operating in D3SOE requires identifying threat actors’
actions to deny, degrade, or disrupt space capabilities, effects, or associated linkages necessary to protect
against those actions. Some threats which may contribute to D3SOE include physical damage to satellites or
ground equipment; signal jamming; signal spoofing; electronic interference with space-related assets, ground
control nodes, control link, or on-orbit assets; and disabling or deceiving user equipment. The most likely
risk to tactical operations is jamming and spoofing directed against SATCOM and PNT links.
2-62. A D3SOE should not be allowed to prevail as the dominant environment within a combat scenario.
Ground force commanders should make every effort to detect, prioritize, and elimate enemy threats that
propagate a D3SOE. Commanders and staffs must understand how current and potential threats and hazards
affect their forces. Threats and hazards must be analyzed during the initial planning phase. They must be
continually identified, monitored, assessed, and revised to identify vulnerabilities throughout mission
operations as they adapt and change over time. Understand both threats and hazards helps the commander
visualize potential impacts on operations.
2-63. Adversaries are constantly seeking ways to create D3SOE effects and use them to their advantage.
The Army depends on Soldiers to understand unit equipment, capabilities, limitations, vulnerabilities, tactics,
techniques, and procedures to fight through a D3SOE. Army space capabilities and effects contribute to
successful unified land operations.

ARMY AVIATION CHALLENGE OF NEGOTIATING A CONTESTED OPERATIONAL

ENVIRONMENT
2-64. Army Aviation operations, intelligence, and command and control functions interact continuously
with products and capabilities available through, or enhanced by, space assets. These assets empower manned
and unmanned aviation capabilities to be lethal and informed, or potentially ineffective if those space assets
are compromised from D3SOE. Ground force commanders must be able to operate with or without such
space assets and understand the criticality of re-establishing disrupted or denied capabilities as soon as
possible. Temporary capabilities may be provided by Army Aviation manned or unmanned platforms.
2-65. Army aviation may provide limited capabilities typically associated with space-based assets such as
communications, navigation, or reconnaissance to the ground force commander in the D3SOE. Army
Aviation is affected by the environment and line of sight range restrictions. Unmanned aircraft systems
dependent on PNT will need to maximize sensor stand-off distance to support in a D3SOE. Army Aviation
has limited ability to augment certain capabilities, including
 Communications retransmission;
 Additional means of reconnaissance and information collection (including Synthetic Aperture
Radar and Ground Moving Target Indicator);

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-11

Chapter 2

 Enhancement of precision fires; and

 Reliable targeting resource for non-GPS reliant precision munitions such as inertial navigations
systems.

SPACE OPERATIONS PERSISTENCE ACROSS THE JOINT PHASING MODEL

2-66. There is usually a difference between the phase the ground operations are in and the phase space
operations are in—or any EMS-dependent elements are in—particularly when ground forces are in the
shaping phase. For example, space operations may be in the deter, seize the initiative, or even entering the
dominate phase of an operation while ground operations are firmly rooted in the shape phase. In EMS-
dependent operations the threat is rarely destroyed. The threat rarely acquiesces when U.S. forces win a
campaign and troop redeployment occurs. The threat to space operations are continuous.
2-67. A major characterization defining space operations are persistence—persistence of threats and
persistence of operations. For mission areas reliant on the EMS, the operations are never-ending, the
capabilities are never cased, and space forces never stand-down in completion of their mission to redeploy
because operations are constantly being contested.
2-68. Persistence of threats and hazards applies to both ground-based and space-based assets. Whether in
battle or in reset, Soldiers are always impacted by persistent counterspace threats. The space threat directly
impacts Soldiers and may be applied against space-based assets, or against the ground assets by disrupting a
satellite communications or navigation signal. Even during peacetime operations, a threat actor could easily
disrupt worldwide SATCOM, PNT, missile warning, and other critical space-based capabilities which may
have significant military, commercial, and civil impacts.
2-69. Traditionally, Army forces conduct training in preparation for deployment, deploy forces to an area
of responsibility, win in a complex environment, redeploy forces, and reset. Sometimes a campaign is
complete in a few months, sometimes it requires constant rotation of forces over a decade or more, but the
campaign ends and troops redeploy. Troops stop deploying for that campaign and the force has the
opportunity to reset; they conduct an end-to-end review of the mission, evaluate doctrine, update tactics,
techniques, and procedures, and conduct training for the next mission.
2-70. EMS-dependent operations are never complete. They must constantly meet combatant commander
needs worldwide–even when there is no campaign to fight. Persistence of space operations is akin to
performing maintenance on a car while driving down the road—space operations are constant, and are being
contested by threat actors every day. There is never a reset—only a persistence barrage of attack must be
defended.
2-71. The six activity phases—shape, deter, seize initiative, dominate, stabilize, and enable civil
authorities—provide a framework for understanding a joint operation. A phase is a planning and execution
tool used to divide an operation in duration or activity (JP 5-0). Phasing helps commanders and staffs
visualize, plan, and execute an entire operation and define requirements in terms of forces, resources, time,
area, and purpose. Phasing helps in planning and controlling operations during execution. Within a phase, a
large portion of the force executes similar or mutually supporting activities.
2-72. Phases are rarely discrete. They often overlap and some phases may occur multiple times, while
others may not occur. Commanders may compress, expand, or omit a phase entirely. Phases may or may not
be conducted sequentially and many activities from a phase may begin in a previous phase and continue well
into subsequent phases.
2-73. While the phasing model is a planning and execution tool, it is important to recognize it is more
applicable to traditional operations than it is for those areas reliant upon the EMS. There are several reasons
for this, including: lack of definition of what electromagnetic actions constitute an act of aggression, and the
reluctance of commanders to initiate an operation plan (OPLAN) when a threat actor only executes
electromagnetic actions against U.S. forces. It is fairly straight forward to identify an act of aggression if a
company of tanks start moving and firing on friendly forces. However, it is more challenging to identify
intentional jamming of a limited frequency range of the EMS or orchestrating a distributed denial of service
attack as an act of aggression.

2-12 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Operational Environment

2-74. Army space forces are engaged in high tempo operations while traditional ground forces are firmly
rooted in the shape phase. Army space operations focus on preventing and deterring conflict by constantly
conducting shaping, deterrence, and stabilization activities. Synchronized space operations with unified
action partners contribute to partnership building, which aids in stability, deterrence, and civil authority.
2-75. When enemy troops are on-the-move and bullets, mortars, and missiles start to fly, the need to initiate
an OPLAN becomes clear. Shaping is ongoing and the effort to deter, seize the initiative, and dominate the
battlefield begins. Generally speaking, in the absence of direct combat there is no need to implement an
OPLAN—troops shape the environment—but are not in battle.
2-76. EMS-dependent operations are different because of their persistent nature—space operations
activities and the level of effort in the shaping phase may not be significantly different from those in the
dominate phase. These operations are definitely out of phase when ground forces are not in battle and will
likely be out of phase with ground operation phases when an OPLAN is implemented. Actions like
intentionally jamming specific frequencies of the EMS or helping orchestrate a distributed denial of service
attack against friendly networks are not viewed as triggers to initiate an OPLAN. What would likely be
viewed as a seize initiative phase for traditional battle is often viewed simply as daily harassment in the EMS.
Once an OPLAN is implemented, response to these actions are viewed as dominate phase activities. This
clearly illustrates why traditional battle and battle between EMS-dependent operations must be viewed
differently by commanders and staffs within the framework of war.
2-77. The battle framework was originally developed to conduct battle in the close and deep areas so we
could engage the enemy across the depth of their formation. The deep fight was conducted with uncommitted
forces used to disrupt the uncommitted echelons of the enemy. While the objective was to disrupt those forces
by the time they got to the close fight, disrupting the uncommitted echelons of the deep fight had no
immediate impact on the close fight.
2-78. With space operations, the reach is worldwide and nearly instantaneous; there is no such thing as a
deep area with uncommitted echelons. From a space domain perspective, space operations are always
engaged in all phases simultaneously across the entire battlefield, without regard to whether the battle occurs
in the close area, deep area, or EME (see figure 2-1). In space operations, the different phases of battle are
compressed; occur rapidly, and phases are often indistinguishable from each other. Army space operations
support all phases of an operation. As operations progress over time, the capacity and intensity of space
operations increase to counter enemy efforts.

Figure 2-1. Space operations persistence across the joint phasing model
2-79. The effects generated against opposing forces using the EMS may be felt nearly instantaneously.
Effects delivered with precision and simultaneity, compress the amount of time the enemy has to respond—

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-13

Chapter 2

it causes confusion to the enemy and gives joint and unified action partners the advantage. The results are a
convergence of effects, synchronized across all domains, where effects in the deep area may immediately
influence the close fight, where the dominate phase influences the shape phase and the battlefield shrinks
immensely for both time and battlespace Creating and exploiting short windows of advantage is essential for
success on the modern battlefield.

HAZARDS, THREATS, AND VULNERABILITIES

2-80. A hazard is a condition with the potential to cause injury, illness, or death of personnel; damage to
or loss of equipment or property; or mission degradation (JP 3-33). Hazards are different from threats—they
are usually predictable and preventable, and may be reduced through effective risk management efforts.
Hazardous conditions are able to destroy life, damage vital resources, and prevent mission accomplishment.
Understanding hazards and their effects on space operations allows the commander to better understand the
terrain, weather, and other factors that support the mission. Understanding hazards also helps the commander
visualize potential impacts on operations, if they occur. Successful interpretation of the environment aids in
correctly opposing threat courses of action within a given geographical region.
2-81. Naturally occuring hazards in the space environment are the result of electromagnetic interference,
which is the result of complex interactions between the Sun’s electromagnetic energy and the Earth’s
magnetic field. Electromagnetic interference can create hazards on a variety of a spacecrafts’ subsystems.
Geomagnetic storms and energetic particle events cause ionospheric scintillation, coronal mass ejections and
solar flares which cause radio bursts, x-rays, and electronic ultraviolet radiation; all are sources of naturally
occuring electromagnetic interference. These can result in a variety of impacts.
 Interference to SATCOM signals which results in distorted and intermittent signals.
 Distorted or interrupted high frequency ground and aircraft radio communications, which includes
radio propagation errors, short wave fade, and blackout.
 Radar interference which leads to false returns, inaccurate ranging, and observation of reflected
objects outside system characteristics.
 Induced accuracy errors on GNSS.
 Drag, excess charging, and damage on a spacecraft which shortens the spacecraft life.
 Trajectory errors on satellite launches.
 False readings from spacecraft sensor payloads.

2-82. A threat is any combination of actors, entities, or forces that have the capability and intent to harm
U.S. forces, U.S. national interests, or the homeland (ADP 3-0). A threat is a fundamental part of an overall
OE for any operation. Threats actors may include individuals, groups of individuals (organized or not
organized), paramilitary or military forces, nation-states, or national alliances.
2-83. When assessing a threat, it is helpful to sort the possible threat types into the four distinct categories,
summarized in figure 2-2:
 Lethal physical weapons attempt to strike directly or create a detonation near a satellite or ground
station. These include—
o Direct ascent anti-satellite weapons—a sub-orbital missile launched directly at a satellite.
o Co-orbital anti-satellite weapons—a weapon launched into orbit and maneuvered to the target
at a time chosen by the owner.
o Attack on a satellite ground station using a variety of weapons such as guided missile, rocket,
artillery, or improvised explosive device.
 Non-lethal physical weapons such as electromagnetic emitters may have physical effects on space
systems without making physical contact.
o Lasers—may be used to temporarily dazzle or permanently blind mission-critical sensors on
a satellite.
o High powered microwave weapons—may be used to disrupt a satellites’ electronics or cause
permanent damage to electrical circuits and processors.
o Electromagnetic pulse weapons—may be used to create high radiation levels in the space
domain used to damage unshielded satellites in the affected and nearby orbits.

2-14 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Operational Environment

 Directed energy attacks target the means by which space systems transmit and receive data by
electromagnetic jamming or spoofing radio frequency signals.
o Electromagnetic jamming is the deliberate radiation, reradiation, or reflection of
electromagnetic energy for the purpose of preventing or reducing an enemy’s effective use
of the EMS, and with the intent of degrading or neutralizing the enemy’s combat capability
(JP 3-13.1). an emulated signal with false and misleading information
o Spoofing is a technique of broadcasting an emulated signal with false or misleading
information in an attempt to deceive a receiver or system into processing the fake data.
Spoofing is designed to provide incorrect results to mislead users, discredit the receiver, or
corrupt the data.
 Cyberspace attack targets the data and the systems dependent upon the data rather than the radio
frequency band in which the information is transmitted. Cyberattacks may target the ground
stations, end-user equipment, or the satellites.

Figure 2-2. Space threat categories

2-84. Commanders and staffs should understand how current and potential threat actors organize, equip,
train, employ, and control their forces. They must continually identify, monitor, and assess threats as they
adapt and change over time. The techniques for evaluating the threat (as described in ATP 2-01.3) provide a
standardized model to articulate various threat capabilities, analyze a threat actor's intent to determine
possible enemy courses of action, and identify threat vulnerabilities to support mission analysis and
operations. When a commander understands the threat, they can visualize, describe, direct, and assess
operations to seize, exploit, and retain the initiative.
2-85. A vulnerability is the characteristics of a system that cause it to suffer a definite degradation
(incapability to perform the designated mission) as a result of having been subjected to a certain level of
effects in an unnatural (man-made) hostile environment (JP 3-60). Space control measures help mitigate risks
and defend against threat actors taking advantage of the vulnerabilities. A few of the possible system
vulnerabilities to space operations include:
 Making required ground station or stations unusable by means such as using a bomb to destroy
all or part of the facility, or cutting the power supply.
 Jamming a ground station, link, or user’s equipment.
 Cyberspace attack.

RISK MANAGEMENT
2-86. Risk management is all about mission assurance and success—it is the logic behind identifying,
assessing, and controlling risks arising from operational factors and making decisions that balance risk cost
with mission benefits. The Army uses risk management to help maintain combat power while ensuring
mission accomplishment in current and future operations. Risk management applies to operational and
nonoperational activities. Army leaders must take prudent risks and make decisions based on informed

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-15

Chapter 2

judgment, risk management principles, and intuition. Failure to include space capabilities, limitations, and
vulnerabilities during mission assessment may lead to an inaccurate risk assessment for the overall mission.
Risk management is a function of the probability of an event occurring and the severity of the event expressed
in terms of the degree to which the incident affects combat power or mission capability.
2-87. Risk management does not eliminate a risk, but will reduce or offset risks when applied properly.
Using risk management processes increases operational effectiveness and the probability of mission
accomplishment. It is a systematic way of identifying threats and vulnerabilities, assessing them, and
managing the associated risks. Commanders, staffs, Army leaders, Soldiers, and Army Civilians are all
responsible to conduct risk management.
2-88. Risk management is a continuous process. Risks should be monitored throughout an operation to
assess the likelihood of occurrence for each risk and develop new risks as the OE changes. Risk management
practices are applied across all Army space operations, day-to-day activities, events, and training functions.
Space operations Soldiers use this continuous process to identify vulnerabilities and assess threats; develop
and recommend controls to minimize the impacts to operations; and continuously evaluate risks as conditions
change.
2-89. Some space-related items to consider during a mission execution risk assessment should include, but
not be limited to, SATCOM availability and security; PNT accuracy for fires, movement, and maneuver;
NAVWAR implications; and identification of terrestrial and space weather with the impacts on unified land
operations. In addition to identifying hazards, threats, and vulnerabilities, general categories for risk
management associated with space operations include policy, planning, operational, and technical.
2-90. Policy risk. This pertains to adherence to the many levels of National, DOD, and Service policy,
appropriate authorities, legal guidance, and international law. Policies address space boundaries, authorities,
and responsibilities. Commanders and staffs should conduct risk assessments and consider potential
cascading and collateral effects due to the military’s distributed use of national, military, and commercial
SATCOM systems, PNT use, and NAVWAR effects.
2-91. Increased risk occurs where policy fails to address operational necessity. If policy fails to keep pace
with peer capabilities, our Soldiers may not be able to conduct the appropriate responses in a timely manner.
For example, using the space domain for only peaceful purposes may prompt concerns for our ability to
thoroughly protect ourselves, our space capabilities, and deliver necessary capabilities and effects.
2-92. Planning risk. This risk pertains to the consequences of not fully integrating space capabilities and
effects into all aspects of mission plans. Examples include failure to integrate space capabilities and effects
across all mission areas, over-stating the expectation of a space capability, and over-classification which may
prohibit key players from actively participating in space planning.
2-93. Operational risk. This pertains to the consequences threat actors pose to space operations which may
impact mission effectiveness. Operational consequences may result in joint forces and unified action partners
operating in a D3SOE. An attack on space forces may be targeted toward a ground facility or an on-orbit
asset and may damage equipment which could cause impacts from degraded capabilities to mission failure.
2-94. Technical risks are exploitable weaknesses in systems. Many weapon system within the Army is
enabled or enhanced in some way by space capabilities, creating potential vulnerabilities. These potential
vulnerabilities may directly impact the Army's ability to project military power to support missions. Space
operations Soldiers examine the technical risk when planning mission operations to ensure risks are properly
assessed and minimized in operations. Refer to ATP 5-19, Risk Management for more information.

SPACE POLICY
2-95. All levels of the U.S. space policy–national, DOD, and Service–have direct and influential impacts
on defining the space OE. Army space operations derives its authorities from these policies. It draws a clear
linkage from strategic national policies to the Army’s operational space forces. As part of the ‘Preserve Peace
Through Strength’ pillar, the National Security Strategy identifies access to the space environment as a vital
interest and clearly identifies the U.S. must maintain our leadership and freedom of action in the space
domain.

2-16 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Operational Environment

“The United States considers unfettered access to and freedom to operate in space to be a
vital interest. Any harmful interference with or an attack upon critical components of our
space architecture that directly affects this vital U.S. interest will be met with a deliberate
response at a time, place, manner, and domain of our choosing.”
National Security Strategy
2-96. The National Space Policy clearly articulates the policy of the U.S. is to conducts space operations
deemed necessary for national security. Space operations are used for peaceful purposes while developing
civil and commercial use of the space environment. National, DOD, and Army space policies embrace the
prudent use of the space environment for security purposes. These policies make it clear space operations are
a critical element of defense capabilities and should be carefully and purposefully developed by each Service,
as appropriate, to help provide a balanced overall capability for the range of military operations. The national-
level policies and joint directives have a direct bearing on Army space operations in support of unified land
operations.

NATIONAL SPACE POLICY

2-97. The National Space Policy commits the U.S. space program to a leadership role in the world. The
U.S. will use the space domain to preserve peace and protect national security, civil, and commercial interests.
The National Space Policy has specific guidelines for DOD and are directly applicable to DOD and Army
space operations. The Army should:
 Be responsible, with support from the Director of National Intelligence, for the development,
acquisition, operation, maintenance, and modernization of SSA capabilities;
 Develop capabilities, plans, and options to deter, defend against, and, if necessary, defeat efforts
to interfere with or attack U.S. or allied space systems;
 Maintain the ability to execute space capabilities; and

2-98. The policy identifies a set of guidelines that apply to all federal departments, agencies, and activities
conducted in the three distinct but independent sectors of commercial, civil, and national security space
capabilities. Some prominent national security space activities Army operations supports are identified in the
‘National Security Space Guidelines’ section of the document.
 Develop, acquire, and operate space systems and supporting information systems and networks
to support national security, and enable defense and intelligence operations during times of peace,
crisis, and conflict.
 Ensure cost-effective survivability of space capabilities, including supporting information
systems and networks, commensurate with their planned use, the consequences of lost or degraded
capability, the threat, and the availability of other means to perform the mission.
 Develop and implement plans, procedures, techniques, and capabilities necessary to ensure
critical national security missions. Options for mission assurance may include rapid restoration of
space assets and leveraging allied, foreign, and or commercial space and non-space capabilities
to help perform the mission.
 Maintain and integrate space surveillance, reconnaissance, and other information to develop
accurate and timely SSA. SSA information should be used to support national and homeland
security, civil space agencies, human space flight activities, and commercial and foreign space
operations.
 Develop and apply advanced technologies and capabilities that respond to changes to the threat
environment.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SPACE POLICY

2-99. DOD directive (DODD) 3100.10, Space Policy implements the National Space Policy, establishes
DOD space policy, and assigns DOD responsibilities for space capabilities. It addresses the need to deter
aggression, promote stability and responsible use of the space domain, integrate space capabilities, and
improve mission assurance. The National Military Strategy recognizes space domain as one of the global
commons and notes our ability to project power from this global commons may be at risk. The space domain

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 2-17

Chapter 2

is critical for Army operations, yet it is becoming increasingly more vulnerable to malicious actions. Space
capabilities and applications will be integrated into the strategy, doctrine, concepts of operations, education,
exercises, operations, and contingency plans of joint forces. DOD space capabilities will be sufficiently
robust, ready, secure, survivable, resilient, and interoperable.
2-100. The Services should act in accordance with DODD 3100.10.
 Integrate space capabilities and applications into all facets of their strategy, doctrine, education,
training, exercises, wargames, experiments, and operations.
 Organize, train, equip, and provide forces for space operations, including operating in a D3SOE.
D3SOE is a composite of the conditions, circumstances, and influences which affect the
employment of space capabilities and effects. D3SOE applies to physical assets and the EMS, and
an impact to either may seriously test the limits of adaptability for all mission operations.
2-101. DOD space capabilities, effects, and activities contribute to national security by:
 Providing support for the inherent right of self-defense and defense commitments to allies and
partners;
 Deterring, warning, and, if necessary, defending against enemy attack;
 Ensuring hostile forces cannot prevent U.S. use of space capabilities;
 Countering, if necessary, space systems and services used for hostile purposes;
 Enhancing operations of U.S. and allied forces;
 Ensuring U.S. ability to conduct military and intelligence space capabilities;
 Satisfying military and intelligence requirements during peace and crisis as well as through all
levels of conflict; and
 Supporting the activities of national policy makers, the intelligence community, the President of
the U.S., Secretary of Defense, combatant commander, military Services, other federal officials,
other government agencies, and continuity of government operations.

ARMY SPACE POLICY

2-102. The Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff of the Army approved AR 900-1, Department of
the Army Space Policy in April 2017.
Space capabilities are critical enablers to projecting land power and winning in close combat.
The Army’s warfighting functions (mission command, intelligence, movement and maneuver,
fires, protection, and sustainment) are all enhanced by incorporating space capabilities.
Army Space Policy
2-103. The Army’s space policy clearly recognizes the Army’s dependency on space capabilities and
continuing commitment to space operations. Army strategic space goals are explicitly echoed in AR 900-1.
The Army’s has four broad space-related objectives.
 Maximize the effectiveness of current space capabilities in support of operational and tactical land
warfighting needs.
 Influence the design, development, acquisition, and concepts of operation of future space systems
that enable and enhance future land forces.
 Advance the development and effective use of responsive, timely, and assured joint interoperable
space capabilities.
 Seamlessly integrate relevant space capabilities into the operating force.

2-104. The Army space policy confirms access to, and use of space capabilities are essential to operational
success. Army space capabilities provide effects on the battlefield, enhance operational support to operating
forces, and contribute to successful execution of Army missions.
2-105. The National Space Policy, DOD Space Policy, and Army space policy reflect the critical aspect
space capabilities serves for current and future military operations. Space capabilities are an integral part of
Army operations and necessary to achieve and maintain Army and joint land warfighting dominance.

2-18 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Chapter 3
Army Space Capabilities
The Army maintains deployable elements, capabilities, and provides effects to Army and
joint forces. These capabilities and effects are available continuously for planned
operations, contingencies, and other surge requirements and operations. They are intended
to support planned, crisis, contingencies, and other surge requirements. Section I discusses
the Army space capabilities, and how they are used to support mission operations. Section
II provides an understanding of the space enabled capabilities used within the Army.
Section III addresses the unique responsibilities of those Army Proponents who have
specified roles in space operations.
3-1. The Army relies on space capabilities and systems to provide global positioning, SATCOM, weather
and related environmental conditions, and intelligence collection platforms. These systems are critical
enablers used by the Army to plan, communicate, navigate, maneuver, engage the enemy, provide missile
warning, maintain situational understanding, protect, and sustain forces. Space capabilities are ubiquitous,
and regularly used by every element of the Army and the joint force. Planning and coordination with national,
Service, joint, and theater resources takes place through liaison with space operations officers.
3-2. Space capabilities increase force effectiveness across the range of military operations through
improved SSA, increased efficiency with which units employ fires, maneuver, and other capabilities. The
space domain affords commanders near-persistent access to A2 and AD, which is an important characteristic
not always afforded to air, land, or maritime operations.
3-3. Space capabilities may be provided to Soldiers by the Army, other Services, civil agencies, and
commercial entities. Units plan, coordinate, and integrate space capabilities into their operations through
organic coordinating staffs. SSEs or other attached Army space forces provide space operations expertise to
organizational staff and units as directed by the unit commander.
3-4. Many command and control systems rely heavily upon space operations, and that reliance carries with
it an inherent vulnerability when conducting operations. Units train to maximize the capabilities space assets
provide in a permissive environment; they also train to operate in the hostile environment of a D3SOE. All
Soldiers receive training to recognize when they are operating in a D3SOE and the tactics, techniques and
procedures to apply to work through the conditions and successfully complete their mission.

SECTION I – SPACE CAPABILITIES

3-5. Space capabilities enable the Army and joint
force to operate across the range of military
Army Space Capabilities
operations. Each Service has specific responsibilities
• SSA
assigned regarding space operations. Two or more
• PNT
Services may have responsibilities within the same
capability, but the Services focus on different aspects • Space control (DSC, OSC, NAVWAR)
of the capability, complementing each other without • SATCOM
duplicating the efforts. The Army has significant • Satellite operations
responsibilities focused on capabilities uniquely • Missile warning
conducted by or directly applicable to Army space • Environmental monitoring
operations. SSA is a key component for space • Space-based surveillance and reconnaissance
operations because it builds the foundation for
accomplishing all other space operations.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-1

Chapter 3

SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS

3-6. SSA is fundamental to conducting space operations. It integrates space-based surveillance, collection,
and processing; environmental monitoring; status of U.S. and cooperative nations satellite systems; status of
U.S. and multinational space readiness; and analysis of the space domain. SSA must incorporate
understanding of the space capabilities and intent of those who pose a threat to Army space operations and
capabilities. SSA includes physical, virtual, information, and human dimensions; and the factors, activities,
and events of all entities conducting, or preparing to conduct space operations. Simply stated, SSA includes
detection, characterization, and assessment of the capabilities and intent of our adversaries.
3-7. SSA requires in-depth knowledge of the space domain, understanding of the OE, intelligence on all
foreign space systems, correlation of effects to a cause, and proper distribution and sharing of SSA
information. SSA supports these four key objectives.
 Ensure space operations and spaceflight safety. SSA provides the infrastructure to ensure space
operators understand the conditions which could adversely impact successful space operations
and spaceflight safety, such as collision avoidance of on-orbit assets.
 Implement international treaties and agreements. SSA is a means by which compliance can be
verified and by which violations can be detected.
 Protect space capabilities. The ability to monitor all space activity enables protection of space
capabilities, helps deter others from initiating attacks against terrestrial and space capabilities, and
assures allies of continuing support during peace, crisis, and conflict.
 Protect military operations and national interests. SSA supports and enhances military operations.

3-8. SSA operations are continuous to ensure the current and future locations of terrestrial and space
systems are known with reliable accuracy. SSA is fundamental to unified land operations because it
characterizes space capabilities and integrates information collection analysis which contribute to the Army’s
ability to understand and react to enemy intent.
3-9. Characterization of friendly assets is necessary to support friendly system anomaly resolution,
establish baselines for evaluating enemy space object identification and surveillance capabilities, and
supports indications and warning development.
3-10. SSA provides the commander the ability to identify the space capabilities available and impacts to
operations in the area of operations. It provides insight into enemy space capabilities and threats to U.S. space
capabilities. Understanding enemy intent is critical to every operation. SSA operations are continually
ongoing to ensure the current and future locations of all satellites are known. Friendly forces may be warned
when enemy space-based information collection assets will be in position to view and record friendly force
activities. SSA supports assured communications which are critical for friendly PNT, FFT, and SATCOM
capabilities to assess unwanted intrusions, attacks, interference, or unintentional hazards. SSA safeguards
targeting and fires assets from unintentional hazards such as radio frequency interference and other naturally
occurring phenomenon.

POSITIONING, NAVIGATION, AND TIMING

3-11. The GPS is a constellation of Earth orbiting satellites and associated ground control stations
providing timing data to military and civilian users all over the world. Public law and national policy
mandates GPS is designated for both military and civilian use.
3-12. The GPS system is operated by the Air Force. Each GPS satellite broadcasts a continuous timing
signal so properly equipped users with direct line of sight access to the satellites can receive and use the
signals simultaneously. When signals from at least four satellites are being received, a GPS receiver can
calculate three-dimensional position. With the proper equipment users obtain the timing signal and can
calculate current position and velocity. GPS is a passive system; therefore, a Soldier can receive and use the
signal without emitting a signal that might compromise their location.
3-13. GPS provides a continuous, precise, all-weather timing signal accurate to a few nanoseconds (ten-
billionths of a second). This signal is used to support navigation services, including:

3-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

 Three-dimension position information (latitude, longitude, and altitude) accurate up to 5 meters;

 Velocity within a fraction of a mile per hour;
 Support to an unlimited number of users and areas.
3-14. Only DOD-approved GPS receivers must be used for Army or joint operations. All DOD combatant
users must use GPS precise positioning service systems. Users must be aware commercial GPS receivers do
not offer the same performance or protection that military receivers provide. In order to provide the best anti-
jam protection, military receivers must be loaded with the latest communications security key.
3-15. GPS signals enable precision targeting and fires from stand-off distances with increased lethality and
reduced collateral damage, precise troop movement and maneuver, and communication. It fosters extended
operational reach, control of the operational tempo, and enhanced command and control. GPS data is a
mission essential element in many weapon systems and combat operations. It enables FFT, unmanned aerial
systems, space-based surveillance and reconnaissance support for situational understanding, and many other
functions. Precision timing enhances the Army’s the ability to synchronize tactical digital networks,
communications, and wide area networking capabilities.
3-16. GPS systems is particularly useful in featureless or obscured terrain. It allow precise maneuver
without sighting specific geographic features. Soldiers can rendezvous to join or support other troops using
waypoints.
3-17. The use of GPS is prolific for determining personnel location and for weapon system applications.
GPS signals can be received and the calculations made in a highly dynamic environment, so the GPS receiver
and processing equipment can be used in precision-guided munitions as a means to increase their accuracy.
GPS is integrated in equipment such as field artillery cannon and rocket systems and munitions that
significantly increase delivery accuracy. A few examples of munitions which use GPS for guidance include
the Army Tactical Missile System, the Multiple Launch Rocket System, and Excalibur 155 millimeter
artillery ammunition. The GPS components in missiles and projectiles enable in-flight corrections that
significantly improve accuracy over ballistic projectiles or munitions using only inertial guidance.
3-18. Precision munitions require greater accuracy. Therefore, GPS receiver equipment is sometimes
coupled with a terrain matching system, terminal homing device, or automatic target recognition capability
to increase accuracy. This facilitates target destruction with smaller or fewer munitions while reducing
collateral damage. It also enables strikes in direct support of combat action executed closer to friendly
positions. Employment of GPS-aided munitions can assist in reducing fratricide and collateral damage. GPS-
aided delivery allows for smaller warheads, thus increasing the range of the weapon.
3-19. Offensive and defensive operations are enhanced with precision navigation aids. The GPS signal can
be used in stability operations to maintain a distance buffer between opposing forces in a truce or stand-down
situation. Marking the coordinates for a demarcation line makes it easier for forces on both sides to remain
on their own side of the demarcation line. Surveying demarcation lines and marking them with GPS-surveyed
locations help forces with GPS receivers to avoid inadvertently crossing these lines.
3-20. The GPS signal is susceptible to electromagnetic interference because the EMS is congested, and
GPS operates on specified frequencies which cannot be changed.

SPACE CONTROL
3-21. Space control enables freedom of action in the space domain for the U.S. and its allies, defeats efforts
to interfere with U.S. and multinational space systems, and denies a threat actor freedom of action in the
space domain. Space control can be used to deny communications and propaganda tools (such as satellite
television and satellite radio) to enemy leadership. The three components of space control are DSC, OSC,
and NAVWAR.

DEFENSIVE SPACE CONTROL

3-22. DSC is the actions taken to protect friendly SATCOM and other space capabilities from attack,
interference, unauthorized intrusions, and hazards. DSC is focused on responding to man-made threats which
may affect the terrestrial and space systems. DSC actions safeguard assets from hazards such as space debris,

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-3

Chapter 3

radio frequency interference, and other naturally occurring phenomenon such as radiation and space weather.
A robust DSC capability influences enemies’ perceptions of space capabilities and makes them less confident
in successfully interfering with those capabilities. Friendly forces may be warned when enemy space-based
reconnaissance and surveillance assets will be in a position to view and record activity. An example of DSC
enabled by SSA is forces using camouflage, concealment, and deception techniques to protect themselves
when notified of potential space-based observations.
3-23. DSC operations protect our capabilities from deliberate interference and threat actor’ attacks. DSC
preserves access to, and use of, space capabilities by reacting to events affecting U.S. and multinational space
capabilities. DSC is built on the capabilities to detect and characterize interference, locate the source of
interference, and defeat the interference, all of which support deterring deliberate interference. DSC is
consistent with the inherent right of self-defense, deters others from deliberate interference and attack,
defends our space systems, contributes to the defense of multinational space systems, and if deterrence fails,
supports efforts to attack them.
3-24. DSC provides encryption and protection of vital communications and information collection links
necessary to support the force in permissive operations and D3SOE. Protection of assets from adversarial
exploitation ensures the commander’s ability to communicate and navigate in a D3SOE. Passive DSC
protection measures such as encryption and electronic hardening of GPS receivers increases the likelihood
Soldiers will receive GPS information in a D3SOE. Active DSC protection actions such as geo-locating
jamming sources assist Soldiers to find, fix, and destroy jammers.

OFFENSIVE SPACE CONTROL

3-25. OSC is offensive actions taken to negate attacks against U.S. and friendly space assets. The
importance of space capabilities in military operations makes it crucial to be capable to negate enemy efforts
interfering with or attacking U.S. and multinational space capabilities. OSC actions employ both reversible
and nonreversible effects. Measures include actions against ground, data link, and space segments or user to
deceive, disrupt, deny, degrade, or destroy enemy’s space systems, or to thwart hostile interference on U.S.
and multinational space systems.
 Deceive—measures designed to mislead an adversary by manipulation, distortion, or falsification
of evidence or information into a system to induce the adversary to react in a manner prejudicial
to their interests.
 Disrupt—measures designed to temporarily impair an adversary’s use or access of a system for a
period, usually without physical damage to the affected system.
 Deny—measures designed to temporarily eliminate an adversary’s use, access, or operation of a
system for a period, usually without physical damage to the affected system.
 Degrade—measures designed to permanently impair (either partially or totally) the adversary’s
use of a system, usually with some physical damage to the affected system.
 Destroy—measures designed to permanently eliminate the adversary’s use of a system, usually
with physical damage to the affected system.

NAVIGATION WARFARE
3-26. The intent of NAVWAR is to ensure unimpeded access to GNSS for joint forces and multinational
partners while denying the same to the enemy. It encompasses various offensive, defensive, and support
activities (such as surveillance, reconnaissance, and EMS management) to ensure unimpeded availability and
integrity of PNT information. NAVWAR may be implemented in a localized area or across all domains and
mission areas. NAVWAR should be a consideration in all joint planning efforts. As it has strategic
implications, it is incumbent upon the Army and joint forces to minimize unintended disruption to civil PNT
services for non-combatants outside the military area or operations.
3-27. The effects of NAVWAR on many systems are complex and may be limited in scope to a few miles
or cover an entire AOR. It includes varying conditions from mild degradation to total GNSS denial, and may
include GNSS signal spoofing. The loss of GNSS signal may yield a significant decrease in the ability to
conduct mission operations. The impact due to GNSS interference—intentional or otherwise—goes far

3-4 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

beyond handheld receiver devices. Loss of signal may impact command and control, precision munitions,
maneuver forces, aviation platforms, network timing protocol, civil and commercial activities.
3-28. The approach to successful NAVWAR operations are through characterization, assured PNT, and
NAVWAR attack. Army forces execute NAVWAR operations by integrating Army capabilities and effects
into joint operations to create a leveraged force multiplier. Army NAVWAR includes operations that
characterize the GNSS environment to gain situational understanding of friendly and threat actors’ intent,
capabilities, and actions.
 Characterization is the ability to understand, visualize, and describe the local PNT environment.
It includes accurate and timely assessments of the OE, including terrestrial, aerial, and space
environments, and the potential impact to these areas and mission in order to plan and conduct
unified land operations. Characterization of the environment provides an assessment of PNT
availability throughout the duration of a mission. Characterization requires a persistent and
integrated network of surveillance and reconnaissance systems and information processing to fuse
the data into a cohesive picture. It includes the capability to determine the effects of the
environment on sensors, weapons, and munitions to deliver fires. It includes obscurants, enemy
capabilities, and intent.
 Assured PNT is reliable, secure, and resilient GNSS data delivered with data integrity to friendly
forces to conduct decisive maneuver and employ precision fires. Assured PNT includes GNSS
augmentation such as using multi-sensor PNT devices to take advantage of other GNSS and non-
GPS signals. Passive measures include the use of anti-jam antennas to null jammers and improved
military GPS receivers used to assure access to PNT. Defensive protection measures include
shielding the receiver—if possible—to block the interference and using proven tactics,
techniques, and procedures. Conducting realistic training in a D3SOE provides Soldiers the ability
to experience these conditions during Home Station and Combat Training Center training
exercises. Training provides Soldiers at all echelons the opportunity to exercises PNT mitigation
techniques in a D3SOE.
 NAVWAR attack is the ability to deny threat actors the use of GNSS through a variety of methods
including offensive cyber operations, space operations, and electronic attack. NAVWAR attack
exploits threat actor’s dependencies and vulnerabilities. NAVWAR effectiveness requires the
application of space operations, cyberspace operations, and electronic attack capabilities to be
synchronized with lethal and nonlethal effects to deliver the desired effects. NAVWAR can be
used to support entry operation, contribute to defeating A2 and AD strategies, enable deep shaping
and strike, and allow local area dominance while preserving access for friendly forces and civil
use. NAVWAR requires multi-domain approach and must be synchronized with kinetic attacks.
Space operations focus on PNT signals, situational understanding, and space control operations.
Cyberspace operations protect friendly networks that leverage GNSS, while targeting similar
adversary capabilities. Electronic warfare combines electronic support, electronic attack, and
electronic protection to understand the impacts of NAVWAR operations, deny adversary access
to GNSS information, and protect friendly capabilities using specific frequencies.
3-29. GNSS disruptions should be anticipated so NAVWAR capabilities should be integrated into the
operations process. Planners must understand how the enemy may attempt to negate the use of GNSS using
NAVWAR techniques and be able to characterize the NAVWAR landscape to identify threats to friendly
GNSS capabilities. GNSS characterization requires a comprehensive awareness and synchronized approach
from space operations, cyberspace, and electronic warfare to be effectively integrated into battle plans.
3-30. Commanders and staffs should understand the extent to which their forces and equipment rely on
GNSS data and how degraded or denied GNSS data impacts operations. They should have situational
understanding of the GNSS landscape. They should understand the impact NAVWAR will have on their
operations, and must recognize the risk to Soldiers and mission in a NAVWAR environment. Soldiers should
be able to recognize the indications of NAVWAR on their equipment, be prepared to employ basic techniques
to mitigate the effects, and notify higher echelons when indications are present. If basic techniques are not
successful, Soldiers should be prepared to implement actions into a primary, alternate, contingency,
emergency (PACE) plans. A PACE plan should include steps, processes, and considerations associated with
operating in a D3SOE.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-5

Chapter 3

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
3-31. SATCOM is a general term used to describe all satellite-based communications—it includes
commercial, military, allied, and civil SATCOM providers. Commercial SATCOM are leased SATCOM
assets provided by commercial entities encompassing DOD bandwidth, DOD-owned or leased commercial-
band terminals and gateways landing DOD mission, and commercial SATCOM used by the DOD but
provided by commercial entities using commercial terminals. Military SATCOM are the SATCOM assets
owned and operated by the DOD in the frequency bands reserved for use by the U.S. government. It includes
those systems owned and operated by the DOD. Military SATCOM also includes Enterprise Gateways (to
include DOD Gateways) and Service gateways.
3-32. The Army employs a combination of military and commercial systems to support its SATCOM
requirements. Army forces require a mixture of narrowband, wideband, commercial and protected SATCOM
for rapid transport of voice, video, and data between the lowest tactical level and headquarters at all echelons.
The capability to move operational information provides increased situational awareness, enables
commanders the opportunity to conduct decentralized operations, and extends joint capabilities to the tactical
level.
3-33. SATCOM offers many unique features to the operating forces as illustrated in figure 3-1. Using a
global network of military and commercial communication satellites, operating forces at all levels of
command can overcome limited infrastructure, execute reachback operations, enable two-way flow of data
to critical nodes, provide support to special users, and increase overall command and control effectiveness.
Further, SATCOM provides critical connectivity for maneuvering forces whose rapid movement and
deployments in non-contiguous areas take them beyond available line of sight communication networks.

Figure 3-1. Key satellite communications features

3-34. SATCOM collectively provides an essential element of national and DOD communications
worldwide. It allows information transfer from the highest levels of government to tactical level for all
matters. SATCOM supports a variety of media, including voice, video, and data services. The satellites’
functionality is generally transparent to the user; SATCOM does not create information, but serves as a
transport medium.
3-35. SATCOM provides updated targeting information and intelligence updates in near real time. Sensor-
to-shooter links enable improved situational awareness, allowing Soldiers to assess fire control techniques
and effectiveness. SATCOM capabilities transmit data such as position, operational status, equipment,
aircraft conditions, transit data, maintenance diagnostics, and prognostics. Table 3-1 summarizes the general
SATCOM attributes.

3-6 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

Table 3-1. Satellite communications attributes

Frequency
Advantages Limitations
Band
• Small terminals, low power • Vulnerable to nuclear events
• Economical • Susceptible to jamming, interference,
Narrowband • Highly mobile scintillation
• Penetrates foliage • Low capacity, crowded spectrum
• Access is limited
• More bandwidth and channels • Limited frequency allocation
• Global connectivity • Susceptible to jamming
• Flexibility in routing • Ground terminals are larger and expensive
Wideband
• Greater protection features
• Less vulnerability to nuclear
blackout or scintillation
• Extensive bandwidth • Technologically complex
• Uncrowded spectrum • Susceptible to rain and atmospheric
• Jam resistant attenuation
Protected band
• Small equipment • Expensive to outfit
• Least vulnerability to nuclear • Ground terminals are large, complex, and
blackout or scintillation expensive

3-36. Systems operating in the ultrahigh frequency range are referred to as narrowband SATCOM systems.
Systems operating in the super-high frequency bands where the bandwidth is primarily used for larger
capacity are referred to as wideband SATCOM systems. Satellite systems operating in the extremely high
frequency bands are referred to as protected band SATCOM systems. These systems are specifically designed
to use the bandwidth to counter electromagnetic interference events and work through nuclear scintillated
environments. The frequency band influences the throughput capacity and degree of protection naturally
provided to the communications system.
3-37. All SATCOM operate on specific electromagnetic frequencies a spacecraft is designed to use. Link
segment signals enable communication between two or more points on the ground and the PNT signal used
for navigation.

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS AND TRANSPORT

3-38. SATCOM provide significant advantages across the range of military operations, from Army-level
strategic operations down to a tactical-level, expeditionary force. These SATCOM capabilities and transport
services support the Army.
 Global reach from the national command authority to the deployed forces.
 Connection to Defense Information Systems Agency services in austere environments.
 Near real time information from sensor to shooter.
 Missile warning indications provided ground and space-based sensors to support an area of
operations.
 Direct downlink of space-based reconnaissance and surveillance sensors into Army TENCAP
systems in support of both situational understanding and targeting.
 Advanced geospatial intelligence to enable operations and defeat enemy camouflage,
concealment and deception.
 Commercial space imagery which supplements national sources to support planning, theater
security cooperation, combat assessment, situational understanding, and cartography.
 Immediate access to tactical networks.
 Access for isolated special operations forces without terrain or distance limitations.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-7

Chapter 3

 Long-haul backbone data transport and reachback to home station.

 Transmission capabilities that span beyond line of sight distances, terrain obstructions, or hostile
forces.

Department of Defense Narrowband Satellite Communications Systems

3-39. The narrowband SATCOM systems support secure voice and data transmission at relatively low data
rates for mobile and fixed users. These systems are primarily designated to support highly mobile, tactical
users. Compact terminal equipment and omnidirectional antennas allow deployed forces to conduct tactical
command and control and quickly exchange both voice and data communications.
3-40. Some Narrowband SATCOM systems have cellular-like capabilities which increases DOD
narrowband capacity and access. These system provide worldwide, point-to-point communication to multi-
Service organizations with fixed and mobile terminal users and allows Soldiers to connect directly to Defense
Information Systems Network services such as to Defense Switched Network, NIPRNET, and SIPRNET.

Department of Defense Wideband Satellite Communications Systems

3-41. The wideband SATCOM systems support multichannel, secure voice, and high data-rate
communications for command and control, crisis management, and intelligence data transfer services. The
heaviest use of wideband communications is multiplexed, wideband, switched networks. Many wideband
users employ large, fixed ground terminals to support DOD enterprise-wide voice, data, and video wideband
networks. Small mobile and relocatable terminals support operations for high-capacity, multichannel
communications aboard ships, aircraft, and ground forces.

Department of Defense Protected Satellite Communications Systems

3-42. The protected SATCOM systems support survivable voice and data communications not normally
found on other systems. Its unique characteristics give it attributes such as anti-jam and scintillation-
resistance along with low probability of interception or detection. Use of the protected SATCOM system has
often been associated with strategic forces and command and control systems. Protected band capabilities
are in demand by tactical and special forces who require anti-jam and low probability of radio transmission
interception or detection. Systems typically operate in the extremely high frequency range.

Commercial Satellite Communications Systems

3-43. Commercial SATCOM might offer greater capacity which can be used to meet and augment the
Army’s rapidly growing information needs. Some wideband services and personal communications services
such as fixed satellite service and mobile satellite service are examples of current commercial SATCOM
support to strategic and tactical mobile users.
 Fixed satellite service provides invaluable support to current military operations.
 Mobile satellite service uses Iridium and Inmarsat services to complement military SATCOM
narrowband services to provide highly mobile communications.
3-44. Commercial SATCOM systems are advantageous to support much of the Army’s predictable,
wideband fixed SATCOM needs. Leasing commercial services affords the Army faster access to advanced
commercial technologies than traditional government programs. In an environment where both the DOD and
adversaries have similar access to advanced technologies and commercial services, sustaining military
advantage likely rest on the DODs ability to integrate those technologies and commercial services into its
force structure faster and more effectively than an adversary.
3-45. Army units seeking to employ commercial SATCOM must follow all specified procedures, satellite
access requests, appropriate reports, and satellite database numbers for each commercial satellite network.
Army units obtain commercial SATCOM services through the Army Network Enterprise Technology
Command and the U.S. Air Force, and must report their arrangements and expenditures for commercial
satellite services to the headquarters, Department of the Army chief information officer or assistant chief of
staff, signal (G-6) office. Satellite provisions obtained through the U.S. Air Force include terms and
conditions for resolution and mitigation of electromagnetic interference and other anomalies.

3-8 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

3-46. To ensure DOD receives ready assured access to commercial services when and where needed, leases
for those services must be procured in the early stages of a contested EME or before the spectrum becomes
too congested. Access and availability to commercial services are based on the terms of the lease or contract.
Experience shows that commercial satellite services may sometimes become unreliable during periods of
political tension or open hostilities. Commercial SATCOM is an important component of DOD
communications and requirements are thoroughly reviewed before employing these communications.

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT SYSTEMS

3-47. The Joint Staff administers the military SATCOM requirements process, which formally documents
users’ needs for SATCOM as a precondition for satellite access. The DOD SATCOM operational manager
has responsibility for validating combatant command and agency requirements for SATCOM resources. The
access process is supported by satellite operations.
3-48. Military SATCOM requires a lot of interaction and planning to ensure users’ needs are validated,
required resources are available, and proper support is offered when problems are experienced. Elements of
the SATCOM support system include SATCOM System Experts, Consolidated SATCOM System Experts,
RSSCs, and the Global Network Operations and Security Center.

SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM EXPERTS

3-49. SATCOM System Experts and Consolidated SATCOM System Experts have detailed knowledge of
assigned system(s) and spectrum. They provide technical, operational, and engineering support as required.
Specific military SATCOM System Expert duties include:
 Provide continuous, 24 hour per day operational support;
 Provide RSSC manning;
 Ensure integrated spectrum operations;
 Advocate user requirements;
 Develop policy and procedures;
 Operationally advise program managers; and
 Assist transition planning.

3-50. A Consolidated SATCOM System Expert is assigned for each SATCOM spectrum (band) and a
SATCOM System Experts is assigned for each system used in the delivery of military SATCOM. The
mission of the Consolidated SATCOM System Expert and SATCOM System Expert is to provide the military
with SATCOM management, planning, control, and protection resources. Consolidated SATCOM System
Experts coordinate and integrate cross-system inputs with support from SATCOM System Experts.
Consolidated SATCOM System Experts provide continuous support to deconflict, assess, analyze, and
integrate SATCOM information, status, configurations, synchronization, sustainment issues, deployment
issues, and anomalies.
3-51. The military narrowband Consolidated SATCOM System Expert and the specific SATCOM System
Expert responsibilities include the manning the RSSCs for narrowband planning, managing the increased
resources for payload operations management and transmission control, and certifying all terminals used
across the narrowband satellite payload.
3-52. The military wideband Consolidated SATCOM System Expert and the specific SATCOM System
Expert responsibilities include the operational payload management and development and sustainment for
specific SATCOM control architecture.

REGIONAL SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT CENTER

3-53. The Army operates four RSSCs responsible to plan and manage regional SATCOM support to the
operating forces. They provide theater communication planners with a single point of contact for narrowband,
wideband, protected band, and commercial SATCOM support. RSSCs provide joint forces with global
SATCOM system status, maintain situational awareness for current and planned SATCOM operations, and

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-9

Chapter 3

support satellite anomaly and electromagnetic interference resolution and management. They are the theater
center of expertise for all military and commercial SATCOM serving the operating forces.
3-54. RSSCs are a multi-Service organization staffed by representatives from Department of the Army,
Department of the Air Force, and Department of the Navy. RSSCs direct and coordinate SATCOM resource
configuration changes with transmission control facilities such as WSOCs, Milstar satellite operations center,
and the naval computer and telecommunications area master station. The RSSCs work with customers,
government agencies, and other Services for commercial SATCOM service.

Capabilities
3-55. RSSCs are the day-to-day operational interface with the user. All users are assigned to an RSSC as
their focal point for SATCOM planning, management, and access support. General locations of the four fixed
RSSCs and current combatant command support assignments are depicted in figure 3-2. In general, the
RSSCs support combatant commanders and their forces in routine, deliberate, and crisis action planning of
SATCOM resources. RSSC personnel participate in planning conferences and appropriate workgroups to
identify and plan theater SATCOM support requirements for mission operations. RSSCs process user satellite
access requests and publish satellite access authorizations for approved missions.

Figure 3-2. Regional satellite communications support center support assignments

3-56. RSSCs perform the following day-to-day management functions for SATCOM resources in direct
support of combatant commander assigned theater forces and other users:
 Accept and analyze validated satellite access requests and develop solutions;
 Plan resource assignments, coordinate resource sharing and borrowing, and publish satellite
access authorizations;
 Assist combatant commander and planners to implement networks and adjudicate usage conflicts;
 Monitor SATCOM systems status (readiness) and outage information; and
 Coordinate user response to satellite anomalies.

3-10 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

3-57. RSSCs support combatant commanders with deliberate and crisis action planning:
 Provide SATCOM support assessments in defining requirements and developing OPLANs,
contingency plans, and communication annexes, theater policy, and procedures;
 Perform battle drills, analyze scenarios, and provide assessments; and
 Track resource utilization and recommend changes for optimizing resources.

3-58. RSSCs support to theater spectrum management activities:

 Assist in SATCOM restoral actions in response to electromagnetic interference or anomalous
conditions; and
 Assist in the joint frequency management office with spectrum allocations and frequency
assignments.
3-59. RSSCs coordinate planning for SATCOM interfaces to the Department of Defense information
networks:
 Facilitate interfaces to the gateways; and
 Coordinate planning with Defense Information Systems Agency field offices contingency and
exercises branch for Department of Defense information networks access.
3-60. RSSCs support and United States Space Command (USSPACECOM) in maintaining global
situational understanding:
 Monitor on-going SATCOM support and assess impact of system changes and anomalies on
current, planned, and future operations;
 Provide data updates on SATCOM resources allocated to specific users;
 Coordinate allocation and resource sharing with other RSSCs; and
 Develop contingency plans for catastrophic failure.

Staffing
3-61. The RSSCs provide direct support to the combatant command and theater forces as the focal point
for all SATCOM planning matters. RSSCs interact with each other, consolidated SATCOM systems experts,
spectrum specific global watch officers, USSPACECOM, and Service unique satellite command and control
centers to coordinate and facilitate the implementation of their plans.
3-62. The Army Service component command provides management responsibilities for day-to-day
operations and key personnel for each RSSC. Each RSSC consists of individual SATCOM spectrum planning
cells staffed with planners by respective Service component. Each designated Consolidated SATCOM
System Expert has administrative control responsibilities for their respective assigned personnel. The RSSCs
conduct continuous, 24-hour operations.
3-63. The planners are proficient in dealing with management and control issues for their particular
systems. Current RSSC staffing responsibilities are listed below and illustrated in figure 3-3 (on page 3-12).
 Army:
o Wideband and super-high frequency SATCOM.
o Narrowband and ultrahigh frequency SATCOM.
 Navy: Narrowband and legacy ultrahigh frequency SATCOM.
 Air Force:
o Protected band.
o Commercial SATCOM fixed and mobile satellite services.
 Defense Information Systems Agency: Consolidated SATCOM System Expert for military
gateways supporting both military and commercial SATCOM.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-11

Chapter 3

Figure 3-3. Regional satellite communications support center organizations

Standard Tasking Process

3-64. Request for support and products are made via the combatant commander or directly to the RSSC.
RSSCs continually analyze resource assignments to make optimization recommendations to combatant
commanders and users. Personnel at each RSSC liaise with combatant commanders, Consolidated SATCOM
System Experts, users, and control centers to maintain situational awareness and respond to changing
demands and requirements.
3-65. A unit requiring satellite access submits a satellite access request via its theater chain of command—
making sure the theater Service component is included—to the combatant commander communications
directorate, Service, or Agency for review and validation. A validated satellite access request is sent to the
appropriate RSSC for analysis and planning. If sufficient system resources are available, the RSSC develops
a satellite access authorization, coordinates pertinent terrestrial interfaces, provides data for satellite
configuration and control, and reports its status. If system resources are unavailable, the request is denied
and sent to the combatant commander’s communications directorate to determine if resources can be
borrowed or preempted from other users.
3-66. Approved satellite access authorizations are sent to the originating unit authorizing operational
access. Additionally, RSSCs direct and coordinate resource configuration directives with satellite operations
centers to implement and monitor communication plans. Individual satellite operations centers have primary
responsibility for monitoring and troubleshooting active networks.

GLOBAL NETWORK OPERATIONS AND SECURITY CENTER

3-67. Global Network Operations and Security Center. The Army global network operations and security
center provides situational awareness and reporting for the Army LandWarNet. It includes the SATCOM
transport layer which provides end-to-end communication services for applications within a layered
architecture of network components. In this capacity, the Army global network operations and security center
monitors the performance and operation of SATCOM ground terminals in support of the Army’s regional
communications requirements. By assessing bandwidth, utilization, environmental factors, throughput,
performance, and outages (planned and unplanned), they provide on-demand operational situational
understanding of Army SATCOM communications in order to determine system availability and integrity.

SATELLITE OPERATIONS
3-68. Satellite operations maneuver, configure, operate, and sustain on-orbit assets and are characterized
as either spacecraft or payload operations. Payload operations includes monitoring and commanding of the
satellite payload to collect data or provide capability in the OE. They are designed to deploy, operate, and

3-12 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

sustain systems in the space environment. Payload operations are critical to the communications, command
and control, movement, maneuver, protection, and sustainment of space assets.
3-69. Soldiers at Army satellite operation centers have responsibility to monitor, sustain, and conduct
payload operations of DODs wideband and narrowband satellite systems. Army wideband satellite operations
maintains a backup control capability through its WSOCs for the SSA and network common user equipment
for some constellations.
3-70. Globally dispersed operations centers such as the WSOCs and strategic Earth terminal sites, provide
vital links between the satellite and controllers to execute spacecraft and payload operations. Satellite
operations contribute to unified land operations through payload operations that ensure secure SATCOM is
available for use when needed. Large scale combat operations are possible because of the enhanced
communications enabled by transmission control and active payload management.
3-71. Satellite operations are characterized as spacecraft and payload operations. Payload operations
include monitoring and commanding of the satellite payload to collect data or provide capability in the OE.
As a critical and essential link between the satellite operator and the operational force, satellite operations
include protection mechanisms to ensure access to space assets. Satellite operations provide significant
contributions to SSA.

SATELLITE CONTROL BATTALION

3-72. A Satellite Control Battalion operates the payloads on satellites in military wideband constellations.
The battalion operates the five WSOCs to manage SATCOM networks, conduct transmissions, controls
satellite payloads, and supports electromagnetic interference resolution on military wideband constellations.
Signal Soldiers with specialized satellite control training perform these missions. These operations centers
enable SATCOM in support of strategic level communications and planning.
3-73. The WSOCs support Army operations through—
 The use, control, and monitoring of military wideband satellites.
 Established satellite links.
 Monitoring and maintaining the satellite link quality.
 Satellite link power management.
 SATCOM Earth terminal monitoring.
 Terminal positive control and subnetwork control.
 Transmission control and communications payload control of military wideband satellites.
 Payload command and telemetry.
 Support to electromagnetic interference resolution.

WIDEBAND SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS CENTER

3-74. WSOCs provide satellite payload and transmission control for DOD communications satellites
providing wideband SATCOM for military forces. Strategic wideband SATCOM is used to carry high
volumes of communications through large terminals located around the world. The primary means for
reachback communications from in-theater headquarters to those in continental U.S. is via military wideband
SATCOM.
3-75. The WSOCs are the focal point for:
 Conducting payload command and telemetry functions;
 Transmissions monitoring functions; and
 Strategic and tactical terminal control functions for military wideband satellites.

3-76. WSOC responsibilities include:

 Controlling terminal access;
 Maintaining operational databases;
 Responding to transmission anomalies and alarms;

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-13

Chapter 3

 Monitoring the health and status of the spacecraft;

 Monitoring for unauthorized users and electromagnetic interference;
 Evaluating the quality of communication links;
 Implementation of restoral plans on a 24-hour basis; and
 Reporting SSA information.

Command
3-77. Through the satellite control battalion, the Army exercises operational control responsibilities for the
WSOCs. The Wideband Consolidated SATCOM System Expert provides technical direction and the RSSCs
develop configuration plans for the communications payloads executed by the WSOCs.
3-78. The WSOCs are geographically dispersed and provide continuous, 24-hour coverage of all assigned
satellites through local and remote monitoring and control equipment. Each company of the satellite control
battalion is strategically positioned and has access to remote monitoring and control equipment at select
gateway sites to provide command and control for military wideband satellites. Figure 3-4 provides an
illustration of the battalion’s mission, which includes transmission control, payload control, and assured
access to resources.

Figure 3-4. Wideband satellite communications operations centers mission overview

3-14 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

Capabilities
3-79. All WSOCs constantly conduct spectrum monitoring of assigned satellites to detect interference,
observe random anomalies, and identify problematic trends, such as declining power output from solar arrays
or unexpected buildup of heat in electronic components on the spacecraft. All WSOCs perform spectrum
monitoring and provide support to electromagnetic interference resolution.
3-80. Transmission control. The WSOCs ensure users do not exceed their allocated share of power and
bandwidth resources. WSOC personnel manage satellite resources and monitor user’s compliance with
established directives and resource allocations. The WSOCs implement the rules of access, bandwidth, and
frequency allocations. They provide continuous worldwide communications in support of strategic level
communications and planning.
3-81. Tasking Process. The WSOCs are tasked by the appropriate RSSC to execute satellite payload
configuration changes, thereby implementing payload and transmission control. Upon detailed allocation
planning for SATCOM resources, the RSSCs task the appropriate WSOC in accordance with configuration
management requirements levied by the wideband Consolidated SATCOM System Expert. The wideband
Consolidated SATCOM System Expert take into consideration combatant commander, communications
requirements from around the world, and direction from Joint Staff.

MISSILE WARNING
3-82. Theater missile warning provides joint forces with early warning to dissuade, deter, and defeat
ballistic missile attacks via theater ballistic missile warning from deployed JTAGS. Space-based missile
detection capabilities assist the commander by providing early warning of enemy ballistic missile launches
to theater forces via theater event system reporting. The theater event system elements receive data from
space-based sensors; they process ballistic missile warning information and disseminate to forward joint
forces and units. The air and missile defense section or element receiving the data coordinates warning
distribution to subordinate units and allies. The theater event system supports the missile defense elements
of active defense, passive defense, and attack operations and directly support all warfighting functions.
3-83. Missile warning is comprised of launch detection and missile tracking components. Missile warning
sensors are hosted on platforms on orbit, in the air, and on the ground. Both launch detection and missile
tracking require space and ground systems to process raw sensor data into reports.
 Launch detection sensors provide real time and post-launch analysis to determine orbital
characteristics and potential conjunctions with other objects on orbit. Launch detection data is
used to evaluate events which could directly or indirectly threaten the U.S. or multinational space
assets. Launch detection data is analyzed to determine potential impacts on assets so timely
warnings and recommendations for suitable countermeasures may be considered.
 Missile warning is the ability to detect missile launch events, track launch-related objects,
discriminate specific objects as a threat, and have a high degree of certainty the trajectory or
impact location is a threat to U.S. homeland, territories, and other designated areas.
3-84. Missile warning reports are transmitted to combatant commanders, and air and missile defense assets;
they contain detection and predicted impact location to facilitate a response to the attack. Missile warning
provides decision makers with pertinent information and operations centers the data for creating awareness
via a COP.
3-85. Missile warning tracking uses all available space and ground system data to provide senior leaders
and allies the requisite timely warning and characterization of ballistic missile events. Missile Tracking
includes launch detection, mid-course tracking, terminal phase re-entry, impact prediction, nuclear
detonations detection (to support threat and non-threat determination), and follow-on decision making.
3-86. Air and missile defense command and control nodes use missile warning to cue active and passive
defenses against incoming enemy ballistic missiles.
 Passive defenses include warning affected troops and populations to take protective measures.
 Active defense includes use of Army missiles to destroy enemy ballistic missiles before they

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-15

Chapter 3

impact their targets as well as cueing other land, air, sea-based missile defense sensors, and
weapon systems.
3-87. The Space-Based Infrared System, and the legacy Defense Support Program satellites make up the
Space-Based Infrared System constellation which provides space-based missile warning. The Space-Based
Infrared System constellation host sensors which detect infrared energy (heat) from sources such as a missiles
booster exhaust. Data is transmitted to the Space-Based Infrared System Mission Control Station and the
theater event system elements of missile warning.
3-88. The theater event system provides assured missile warning to the geographic combatant commands.
Army space operations are responsible to provide in-theater missile warning. The theater missile warning
detachments, which operate the JTAGS, are strategically positioned worldwide to receive data directly from
Space-Based Infrared System satellites in their fields of view. The theater missile warning detachments
process the data to identify missile launch points, trajectory, and locations where warheads are likely to
impact. The detachments disseminate ballistic missile warning information to theater command centers.
Theater missile warning detachments are located to optimize data receipt and theater dissemination.
3-89. Space-based missile warning detection capabilities assist commanders by providing early warning of
enemy ballistic missile launches via the theater event system reporting. The theater event system supports
the missile defense operational elements of active defense, passive defense, attack operations, command and
control, and intelligence architectures. The theater event system broadcasts data to forward units where the
air and missile defense section or element coordinates warning distribution to subordinate units and allies.
The theater event system warning element directly supports command and control, fires, intelligence, and
maneuver operations.
 Identification of missile type supporting passive defense. This may help determine the appropriate
chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear protection measures, if the missile is capable of
carrying such warhead and if maneuver units need to go to a higher mission-oriented protective
posture level.
 Predicted impact point and time supporting passive defense. The theater event system warns units
near the impact point to take protective action. A significant implication is maneuver units
confirmed to be not in danger can continue normal operations.
 Estimated launch point supporting attack operations. This provides target intelligence in support
of deep attack operations and active defense. The commander may employ combat maneuver
forces and fires to attack mobile launch systems, their support areas, and installations. The
commander may also employ fires to attack incoming missiles.
3-90. Information provided by space-based sensors support strategic and theater missile warning activities.
Space-based sensors support technical intelligence provided to combatant commands, force planners, and
policy makers. It contributes to scientific and technical intelligence on foreign threat systems, selected space
programs or systems, and supports materiel acquisition. This information supports commanders in executing
their intelligence warfighting function in a near real time manner, and influences their decision making
process through the provision of a more complete COP.
3-91. To help influence theater activity, space-based missile detection capabilities assist the unit
commander by providing early warning of enemy launches. The scope and capabilities of the missile warning
systems aids in deterring the enemy from conducting threat missile launch activities. This helps unit
commanders assess current and future risk, and gives commanders the ability to shape and influence current
engagements. Missile detection helps develop joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational
partner capacity.
3-92. Shared Early Warning. The U.S. participates in the shared early warning construct to exchanges
launch detection and missile warning information with specific unified action partners and some treaty
participating nations. Shared early warning permits joint forces to provide missile warning to allied nations,
civilian populations of foreign partners, and neutral parties. The objective of shared early warning is the
continuous exchange of missile early warning notifications. Information derived from missile warning
sensors allows recipients to take protective measures to help protect noncombatants. This helps stabilize
political and military situations. Information on missile launches is provided in near real-time and is the same

3-16 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

quality and timeliness as would be provided to joint and allied forces. Shared early warning information also
has the added benefits of building trust between nations and establishing partnerships.

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
3-93. Adverse space weather can impact satellites, communications links, and ground stations which have
a cascading effect on Army ground operations. Knowledge of these factors allows forces to mitigate adverse
environmental conditions while taking advantage of favorable conditions to enhance operations. Such
monitoring also supports IPB by providing the commander with information needed to identify and analyze
a potential enemies courses of action (COA).
3-94. Weather influences military planners and is accounted for during the planning, preparation,
execution, and assessment of operations. Weather data is part of the information required by commanders
and staffs when planning, preparing, executing, and assessing combat operations. The results from analyzing
weather data, identifying potential weather effects, and assessing the impact of weather on systems, tactics,
and operations provide vital information for commanders to optimally employ their forces.
3-95. Knowledge and understanding of operational effects presented by the space environment are
increasingly more relevant within the IPB process. Historically, analysis of the space environment focused
on solar and lunar predictions and their effects on tides and illumination. As our understanding of space
weather has increased, military considerations for space weather conditions and the implications on
operations have increased as well. Space weather events may adversely affect PNT, surveillance and
reconnaissance missions, as well as terrestrial and space communications capabilities. Net-centric operations
rely extensively on continuously available SATCOM; understanding the influences of space weather events
on all communication requirements allow commanders to work mitigation efforts for predicted periods of
reduced availability.
3-96. Space capabilities provide data that forms the basis for forecasts, alerts, and warnings for the space
environment that may negatively impact space assets and space operations. These space-based environmental
monitoring capabilities provide the ability to forecast and warn operating forces of degraded SATCOM and
GPS signals due to ionospheric disturbances from space weather.
3-97. Operational planners must focus mission analysis over widespread, geographically diverse areas. For
military applications, weather forecast information should be tailored to support operations that range from
small surgical strikes to theater-wide operations. Terrestrial weather, space weather, or both may significantly
impact both friendly and threat operations.
3-98. Space weather has become an important facet in SATCOM, which is a common means of
communication. Although it is impossible to prevent phenomena produced by the sun from affecting
communications and navigation systems, forecasting adverse effects on terrestrial and space assets gives
commanders increased SSA during planning, preparation, and execution of missions or operations. For
example, the Joint Battle Command-Platform provides brigade combat teams with enhanced communications
capabilities by utilizing SATCOM, PNT, reporting, and friendly identification. Any space weather impacts
on SATCOM may have an adverse effect on brigade combat team operations and mission success. Different
types of solar events may have different impacts on equipment, and the impact may be forecast to occur in
2-3 minutes, 1-2 hours, or the next day.
3-99. Space-based meteorological systems provide timely and accurate terrestrial weather, details on
environmental conditions, and space environment data. These systems provide the commander a clear
understanding of the environmental impacts on operations throughout the depth of the operational area. The
Army uses space-based environmental monitoring benefits for planning support to operations. Space-based
meteorological payloads:
 Detect terrestrial weather throughout the area of responsibility;
 Provide timely receipt and access of weather observations from remote locations;
 Detect space weather to forecast potential effects and understand actual effects on
communications and space assets;
 Detect soil moisture content which can support assessments of trafficability such as unrestricted,
restricted, and severely restricted terrain based on recent precipitation and analysis of soil type;

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-17

Chapter 3

 Vegetation and materials analysis has important benefits to counterinsurgency and law
enforcement operations, as well as effects on crop yield and production;
 Detect obscurants and differentiate between types, such as dust, smoke, fog, and oil mist;
 Detect ionospheric disturbances, such as scintillation, which can impact ultrahigh frequency
space-based sensor reliability;
 Detect changes in activity in a given area which can be especially beneficial supporting
counterdrug, law enforcement, detecting and monitoring environmental damage, and disaster
relief; and
 Increase overall understanding of the area of responsibility by using multispectral imagery.
3-100. Terrestrial weather can impact space-based surveillance and reconnaissance. Clouds, heavy rain,
and sand storms all have an impact on imagery. Time of day and lighting conditions may affect electro-
optical imagery quality. Severe weather around a mission ground station can impact data reception. JP 3-14
further identifies impacts of weather on space capabilities.
 Weather. The terrestrial and space environment can adversely impact a wide range of space
systems and missions. Meteorological information is crucial to understanding and reacting to the
effects of the environment on both terrestrial and space operations. The environment affects
almost all aspects of operations. A few examples are: mission timing, route selection, target and
weapon selection, mode of weapon delivery, communications, reconnaissance, and surveillance.
 Space environment. Space capabilities provide data that forms the basis for forecasts, alerts, and
warning for space environment that may negatively impact space assets, space operations and
their terrestrial users.
 Oceanography. Knowledge of the location and characteristics of oceanographic features, such as
sea heights, sea surface ice, currents, fronts, and eddies, is essential to all maritime forces. It is
especially critical for undersea warfare operations and may be used by commanders to avoid
submarine or maritime mine threats. This knowledge can also be used to concentrate forces in an
area where an adversary is most likely to be operating to optimize search and rescue operations
at sea, and to help determine optimum locations for amphibious landings.
3-101. The Army receives weather support from the Air Force. Data received from systems such as the
Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites and Defense Meteorological Satellite Program, can
provide information on environmental factors that may affect military operations.
3-102. The Army receives geospatial information and services support through National Geospatial-
Intelligence Agency and organic Army assets. Imagery capabilities such as multispectral and hyperspectral
imagery can provide planners with current information on sub-surface, surface, and air conditions such as
trafficability, beach conditions, vegetation, and land use.

SPACE-BASED SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE

3-103. Space-based information collection systems are a crucial enabler supporting all Army operations.
Space capabilities are well suited for information collection missions. Satellite systems is well suited for
imaging and information collection missions as they allow access to otherwise denied areas. The Army
Intelligence Center of Excellence is responsible for space-based reconnaissance and surveillance force
integration and life-cycle management of Army-related user equipment. Army access to overhead
information collection is provided through established intelligence channels.
3-104. Space-based information collection complements air and ground based information collection.
Surveillance from the space domain enables the forces to overcome terrestrial line of sight restrictions and
affords coverage of large area of interest. In some cases, such as forced entry, the only early surveillance
available will likely be from space assets. Space sensors can provide multispectral, hyperspectral, and
synthetic aperture radar imagery, geospatial and signals intelligence, and other various capabilities of value
to the supported Army commander. The Army leverages space-based collection through the submission of
requests for collection through the joint collection management process.

3-18 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

3-105. When a requirement is designated for collection, a tasking is sent to the appropriate resource through
a ground station. Once collected, data is disseminated to the original requester. As with any information
collection resource, the capabilities and limitations must be understood.
3-106. Space-based surveillance and reconnaissance activities enable the commander to plan for troop
placement and maintain an understanding of enemy activities that may negatively or otherwise impact
operations. The information gathered through space capabilities contributes to the development of
intelligence and other actions influencing the commander’s current and future operational decisions. In-
theater, direct downlink capabilities provide timely access to information collection products and responsive
support to the ground maneuver force requests for information. Imagery products may be used to assess a
unit’s movement and maneuver capabilities. Space assets are used for battle damage assessment, strategic
warning, monitoring for force buildups, and precision location of enemy forces.

SECTION II – SPACE-ENABLED CAPABILITIES

FRIENDLY FORCE TRACKING

3-107. The mission is to responsively deliver FFT capabilities to provide authorized users with secure,
accurate, timely, and actionable information is provided to a COP to improve situational awareness. FFT data
services are provided to all combatant commanders, agencies, allies, and multinational partners. The joint,
interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational nature of the mission is unique and requires integration
across the broad community of interest to execute responsibilities, address user needs, accomplish essential
tasks to enable data sharing, and integrate operations.
3-108. FFT systems provide the commander the ability to track small unit patrols and teams intermingled
with the local populace. Integrating the FFT information into the theater COP is of great importance if a
friendly force unit needs to be reinforced or removed from a difficult situation. FFT systems provide the
exact location information necessary to track units, and thus contribute to effective command and control,
situational understanding, personnel recovery, and fratricide avoidance.

CAPABILITIES
3-109. FFT capabilities meet data sharing and dissemination needs to enable FFT systems to interoperate
with other systems and feed common command and control systems and COP.
3-110. FFT capabilities help avoid fratricide incidents while maintaining a high operations tempo. The
majority of FFT devices rely on space assets to maintain critical links associated with tactical navigation
operations. The primary information technology application for situational understanding and command and
control at tactical command posts is Joint Battle Command-Platform, which uses FFT to share GPS-enabled
situational awareness information among command posts at tactical echelons. FFT tagging, tracking and
locating devices and personnel recovery devices use GPS and supports tracking of vehicles and personnel;
enabling accurate area of operations situational awareness and enhancing awareness of deployed and on-the-
move forces.
3-111. As FFT continues to evolve and more systems and devices are deployed globally, the critical need
for data interoperability across security and command and control systems continues to increase. FFT roles
include:
 Dissemination of information services such as tagging, tracking, and locating and personnel
recovery support;
 System expertise for advice in planning, information assurance, device procurement and
management, data owner guidance, and COP integration;
 Deliberate planning assistance in support of operational plans and concept plans for FFT
activities;
 Data integration consistent with network enabled command and control modernization;
 Emergency message alerting and notification;

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-19

Chapter 3

 Operations and limited exercise support to include troubleshooting, subject matter expert support,
testing, and limited training; and
 Analyzing and developing solutions to satisfy requests for FFT support.

SUPPORT AND DISSEMINATION

3-112. The Army satisfies the FFT mission responsibilities by operating the force tracking mission
management center. The force tracking mission management center has global reach and leverages the
Department of Defense information networks to provide tailored FFT data translation, cross-domain data
transfer, and data dissemination services for authorized users. The force tracking mission management center
is a critical link in the FFT architecture between operating forces, national agencies, and the many
dissemination architectures. They are the central point for FFT implementation, troubleshooting, and
coordination.
3-113. The Army determines the priority of user support requests and endeavors to support all valid
operational needs. FFT data is transmitted between devices and systems using line of sight or beyond line of
sight SATCOM. The FFT device transmits data to a processing node. The information is routed from the data
processing node directly to a COP or through the force tracking mission management center for further
processing and dissemination. A graphic illustration of the FFT data flow is in figure 3-5.

Figure 3-5. Friendly force tracking data flow overview

3-114. Line of sight communications. The receiving platform collects and passes position location
information to a central gathering point. The line of sight system is limited to relatively local use and may
experience outages as individual platforms lose line of sight access to one another.
3-115. A variety of military and commercial SATCOM have transceivers that receives and transmits the
signal to a ground site where a command and control system manager gathers individual platform location
information. This information is sent to the user’s pre-designated location and incorporated into thee COP.
In most cases the data is provided to Global Command Control System via SIPRNET or through a designated
Integrated Broadcast Service satellite for broadcast over all or part of the area of operations.

3-20 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

COMMERCIAL IMAGERY
3-116. Unclassified commercial satellite imagery is used by U.S. forces, other government agencies, and
multinational partners in the combatant commander’s area of responsibility to enhance knowledge of the
environment within the operational area. All Army organizations and units requiring collection from national
or commercial remote sensing capabilities go through local or regional G-2 (or unit equivalent) Collection
Management sections. A tasking request for remote sensing data is process, validated, prioritized, and
submitted for collection. When located at an organization that does not have a local or regional G-2 Collection
Management section, Army personnel shall contact the Army Departmental Requirements Office at:
armydro@[Link].
3-117. The NRO serves as the DOD lead for all acquisition or exchange of commercial imagery. Army
personnel are required to acquire commercial imagery through existing DOD or intelligence community
imagery libraries to the greatest extent possible. When required imagery is unavailable from an approved
imagery library, Army personnel are permitted to request a new tasking from space-based sensors following
established procedures through the Army Geospatial Center Imagery Office. When new tasks are not satisfied
through established processes, Army units may acquire commercial imagery direct from vendors who have
a pre-established contract with the U.S. government. The Army Geospatial Center Imagery Office (available
at dll-agc-aio@[Link]) collaborates directly with U.S. agencies, services, commercial satellite, and
aerial digital imagery vendors to provide requested imagery.
3-118. The SSEs, ARSSTs, and Army space control planning teams rely on unclassified commercial space-
based imagery for planning and real-time operations. Commercial imagery is used in support of defense
support of civil authorities’ missions.

TACTICAL EXPLOITATION OF NATIONAL CAPABILITY

3-119. The Army TENCAP program delivers unique capability as the Army’s lead activity to influence,
leverage, and integrate the national intelligence enterprise to benefit the Army through the space capabilities.
The Army TENCAP program is vital to understanding, influencing, and integrating current and emerging
national overhead systems data into the tactical decision making process.
3-120. Army TENCAP evolved from the Army recognition that national overhead systems developed for
the National Command Authorities had potential to support Army forces with space capabilities at the tactical
level. Throughout the early and mid-1970s the Army explored the tactical applicability of national systems
to corps level operations and began developing and fielding tools needed to leverage those systems. The
office created to do this, under the auspices of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations (now the Army
assistant chief of staff, operations), became the Army TENCAP Program.
3-121. The Army’s TENCAP Program is managed by Program Executive Office for Intelligence,
Electronic Warfare, and Sensors and is directed by a general officer steering group chaired by the Assistant
Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Technology, Military Deputy, Army G-2. Selected
Department of the Army headquarters principal staff, the Army Capabilities Integration Center, and the U.S.
Army Intelligence Center of Excellence round-out a general officer steering group membership.
3-122. The TENCAP mission is fivefold:
 Conduct cross-agency systems engineering to leverage national capabilities for Army purposes;
 Understand and influence national technologies and architectures;
 Be the Army’s technical interface to the National Reconnaissance Office and the National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency;
 Provide core engineering expertise across the national and theater intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance layers to integrate national capabilities within Army terrestrial, space, and
foundation layers; and
 Leverage the intelligence community’s investment in overhead technologies, and transition
applicable technologies to the Army to satisfy validated Army requirements.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-21

Chapter 3

SECTION III – ARMY SPACE PROPONENT AND CONTRIBUTORS

3-123. AR 5-22 establishes policies, duties, responsibilities, and relationships applicable to the Army Force
Modernization Proponent System. The force modernization proponent is the Headquarters, Department of
the Army principal official or the commander, commandant, director, or chief of a center, school, institution,
or agency with primary duties and responsibilities relative to doctrine, organization, training, materiel,
leadership and education, personnel, and facilities, and policy (known as DOTMLPF-P) requirements for a
particular function.

ARMY SPACE PROPONENT ROLE

3-124. The USASMDC Space and Missile Defense Center of Excellence is the force modernization
proponent designated by the Secretary of the Army as—
 The Army Service component command for space operations.
 The Army Proponent for space operations.

3-125. The Proponent is responsible to—

 Provide existing and emerging Army space capabilities to joint and allied forces to deliver
decisive combat power in the area of operations. They
 Plan and execute continuous military space operations and sustain assigned units supporting the
combatant command.
 Support all space operational mission areas.
 Employ and integrate Army space forces into global, national, and military operations.
3-126. The Commanding General—
 Exercises administrative, tactical, and or operational control authority and responsibilities over
Army space forces for those authorities a combatant command does not exercise.
 Is the personnel developer for space operations officers per AR 600-3, and
 Is the lead agent for implementation of Army space cadre efforts and are executed by the Army
Space Personnel Development Office.
3-127. The space Proponent contributions include—
 Provide SSA to Army and joint forces;
 Provide assured PNT;
 Conducts space control operations (to include designated NAVWAR responsibilities);
 Provides missile warning direct to theater command centers via JTAGS;
 Provide space support via ARSSTs;
 Conduct satellite operations at five WSOCs;
 Conduct network integration at four RSSCs as part of the DOD SATCOM.
 Provide day-to-day management for operations at all four RSSCs which provides a single point
of contact for narrowband, wideband, protected band, and commercial SATCOM support.
 Consolidated SATCOM Systems Expert for:
o Military narrowband SATCOM.
o Military wideband SATCOM.
 SATCOM Systems Expert for:
o DSCS.
o Global Broadcast Service.
o Mobile User Objective System.
o WGS.
 FFT mission equipping, staffing, and operating the FFT mission management center.

3-22 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Capabilities

CYBERSPACE PROPONENT ROLE

3-128. The Army Cyber Center of Excellence is the force modernization proponent and performs proponent
responsibility for signal, communications networks, information services, cyberspace operations, electronic
warfare, and the branch proponent for Signal and Cyber. The Cyber Center of Excellence defines integration
tasks for Army operations, with oversight and policy guidance from the G-6. They develop and conduct
resident, distributed, and continuing education training in signal and cyberspace specialties.

CYBERSPACE CONTRIBUTIONS
3-129. Cyberspace is a global domain within the information environment consisting of interdependent
networks of information technology infrastructures, and resident data, including the Internet,
telecommunications networks, computer systems, and embedded processors and controllers. Friendly,
enemy, adversary, and host-nation networks, communications systems, computers, cellular phone systems,
social media, and technical infrastructures are all part of cyberspace.
3-130. Cyberspace continues to become increasingly congested and contested. Army forces must be able
to effectively operate in cyberspace, while controlling the ability of others to operate in that domain. Rapid
developments in cyberspace will challenge friendly advantages in cyberspace. While Army forces cannot
defend against every kind of intrusion, commanders and staffs should take steps to identify, prioritize, and
defend their most important networks and data. Commanders and cyberspace operations experts should also
adapt quickly and effectively to enemy and adversary presence inside cyberspace systems.

ELECTRONIC WARFARE CONTRIBUTIONS

3-131. One third of NAVWAR is electronic warfare operations. Electronic warfare combines electronic
support, electronic attack, and electronic protection to understand the impacts NAVWAR has on mission
operations, deny adversary access to GNSS information, and protect friendly capabilities within the EMS.

SIGNAL PROPONENT ROLE

3-132. The Army Cyber Center of Excellence is the force modernization proponent for Signal. The Cyber
Center of Excellence exercises proponent responsibilities for Department of Defense information network
operations, network transport and information services, spectrum management, and visual information. The
Commanding General, Army Cyber Center of Excellence performs force modernization functions for the
Signal Corps and the Commandant, Army Signal School is the Signal branch proponent.
3-133. Army tactical ground operations depend on Signal Soldiers to establish and use SATCOM for inter-
and intra-theater, beyond line of sight communications. The tactical operations center is the center of activity
where many SATCOM feeds terminate and much of the data is digested and used to make decisions. The
satellite terminals provide commanders and Soldiers with assured, reliable high-speed, high-capacity satellite
terminal connectivity using both commercial and military satellite constellations operating on and across the
military ultrahigh, super-high, and extremely high frequency bands. The use of SATCOM increases the
operational reach and situational awareness of the entire force.
3-134. SATCOM is a key means of information transport for unified land operations. Each of the five
WSOC’s have uniquely trained Signal Soldiers who perform satellite operations of select DOD SATCOM
resources. SATCOM systems provide long-haul capability, redundant paths for tactical communications,
communications on-the-move, beyond line of sight communications, and flexibility to commanders and
warfighters. Support to intra-theater communications and connectivity to Department of Defense information
network provides critical services that route through military SATCOM constellations.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 3-23

This page intentionally left blank.
 Chapter 4
Army Space Operations
Section I discusses Army space operations, roles, and responsibilities at Army, corps and
division headquarters levels. It provides an understanding of the specific roles and
functions of Army space elements, which includes SSEs, ARSSTs, and other elements
providing support to operations. The SSE is the commander’s primary advisor on Army
space operations at the Army, corps, and division level. The SSE plans, integrates, and
coordinates space support to operations across all warfighting functions. The final part of
this section identifies how Army space operations supports each of the six warfighting
functions, and special operations forces Section II addresses the unique space operations
coordination requirements of joint space operations.

SECTION I – ARMY SPACE OPERATIONS

4-1. Army space operations are founded on the depth and breadth of knowledge of the Army space cadre.
Army space cadre members are professionals serving in a multitude of positions across the Army bringing
space capabilities to Army operations. The Soldiers and Army Civilians may be assigned to space operations,
signal, cyber, electronic warfare, intelligence operations, and other areas supporting all aspects of the
operations process. The Army space cadre develops, plans, acquires, and operates space systems and
capabilities to fulfill mission requirements. The space cadre is instrumental to the Army’s critical use of space
capabilities in large scale combat operations. The Army space operations are structured around Active Army,
Army National Guard, and United States Army Reserve.
4-2. Space cadre members establishes the conditions that strengthen the mutual trust, esprit de corps, and
cohesive teamwork by setting the example and motivating the team to enable professional organizational
climates. The space operations officer develops and trusts their team to take disciplined initiative, consistent
with leader’s intent and bounded by the Army Ethic. The space operations officer delegates the authority for
subordinates to take prudent risk, overcome adversity, and accomplish the mission, in the right way.
4-3. The Army functional area 40 is space operations. Space operations officers form the core of Army
space operations and are accessed from nearly every military occupational specialty and career field within
the Army. This diversity gives the space operations community a broad level of understanding of Army
operations. Every space operations officer brings detailed knowledge of space operations, including detailed
understanding of space capabilities, D3SOE, using space operations to create a position of relative advantage,
and maneuver applied to space operations.

The Army space planners ensures space capabilities and effects are fully integrated
into all mission operations and advises the supported commander of the current space
assessment.

4-4. A space operations officer is responsible for providing space-related planning, operational support,
and expertise on space capabilities. A space operations officer is an honorable servant, Army expert, and
steward of the profession who ethically, effectively, and efficiently integrates space capabilities into
operations, provides general support to staff operations, and supports both deliberate and crisis action
planning.
4-5. The space operations officer’s primary analytical tool is the distributed common ground system-Army
workstation with Army approved space-unique and common space-related applications, which are approved
to connect to the host units distributed common ground system-Army server via SIPRNET. The analytical

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-1

Chapter 4

tools on the workstations provide the SSEs and ARSSTs with the necessary equipment to accomplish their
required tasks.
4-6. Space operations officer responsibilities are below. Refer to FM 6-0 for a list of common staff duties,
responsibilities, characteristics, and relationships.
 Advise commanders and staff on the capabilities, limitations, considerations, and effects of space
operations specific to the commander’s intent, concept of operations, unit mission, and space
threat.
 In conjunction with legal counsel, advise commanders on space-related legal authority, and rules
of engagement.
 Provide space knowledge, develop the space operations requirements, and prepare the space
running estimate as part of the MDMP.
 Ensure active collaboration across the staff, unified action partners, and external entities such as
staff counterparts at higher and lower echelons, adjacent units, and the intelligence community to
enable shared understanding of the space OE and employ space operations.
 Develop and provide space-related courses of action to support the scheme of maneuver.
 Ensure space operations are integrated into all staff processes.
 Account for space effects, capabilities, constraints, limitations, and second and third order effects.
 Ensure possible effects of a D3SOE are integrated into mission planning.
 Ensure staff awareness of space domain-related electromagnetic interference.
 Maintain the space portion of the COP.
 Ensure space-related capabilities support development of critical asset list and defended asset list.
 Execute assigned tasks, maintain awareness of the challenges facing the unit, and offer space
capabilities as solutions.
 Support and perform Army-related integrated joint special technical operations duties and
responsibilities, as required.

ARMY SPACE SUPPORT ELEMENTS

4-7. All theater Armies, field armies, corps, and division headquarters have organic SSE for planning,
integration, and coordination of space capabilities. The Army SSE is responsible to plan for space
capabilities, effects, and support to headquarters and staffs, and support Army space operations personnel
deployed in their area of operations. The SSE is the space operations subject matter expert on the staff and
provides SSA for the unit. The SSE is assigned to the assistant chief of staff, operations (G-3) staff to provide
organic space operation planning and assessment for the commander, staff, assigned, and attached
subordinate units.
4-8. The SSE supports all combatant commander operational missions by planning and coordinating joint
space assets supporting the theater commander. They provide recommendations for space operations support,
additional space operations personnel, and additional equipment required to support Army operations. The
SSE coordinates space augmentation requirements in support of OPLAN or the commander’s requirement.
They also provide assistance with targeting of space-based assets and those reliant on the ground segment.
4-9. The primary role of the SSE is to synchronize space capabilities and effects throughout the operations
process to maximizing the positive impact of space capabilities for the commander’s needs. They are
responsible for maintaining SSA and updating the space portion of the COP. SSE members coordinate space
operations objectives and tasks with their counterparts at higher and lower echelons. The SSE serves as the
primary command and control element within the staff for space operations.
4-10. The SSE develops the space operations mission statement and concept of space operations,
emphasizing aspects of the base plan which require space support and may benefit from the use of space
capabilities. They identify space capabilities required to support mission operations or impacts to them, and
the risks of enemy counterspace operations. Some space assets and related capabilities require a long lead
time for planning and preparation. Adequate support to the mission must account for phasing: the SSE must
incorporate effects into shaping operations as well as deter, and seize the initiative as part of decisive

4-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations

operation. Some space operations are executed before other aspects of the overall operation. Defined, but
flexible processes are used to structure space operation planning.
4-11. The SSE focuses on integration of the wide range of space capabilities across all warfighting
functions. The SSE educates members of the staff to ensure they are fully aware of space capabilities,
limitations, and vulnerabilities. They routinely work with members of the coordinating and special staffs.
4-12. When the number of subordinate echelons exceeds the capacity of the SSE to provide effective
support, the SSE should request augmentation from an ARSST. At echelons below division, where no space
operations officers are assigned, brigade and battalion staffs receive support from their higher command’s
SSE in the form of space running estimates and other planning products. Requests for space support, space-
related information, or personnel augmentation follow unit standard operating procedures.
4-13. The SSE senior space operations officer may be designated as the command’s special technical
operations chief if one is not organically assigned. When directed to fill the special technical operations
position, the chief will manage the billets for the command, have oversight of special technical operation
planning, requests, exercises, operations, and inspections. The chief ensures all special technical operations
informational security requirements are met. The details of these operations are largely classified and specific
training is required prior to assumption of duties.

ARMY SPACE SUPPORT TEAMS

4-14. An ARSST provides space planning expertise, capabilities, products, and SSA of space assets. When
serving as a part of an ARSST, the space operations officer leads a specialized operations team which
provides space operations-related support to staff and products in support of the SSE. In the absence of an
SSE, the ARSST assumes all roles and responsibilities of the SSE in addition to retaining the duties of an
ARSST. ARSST may augment the staff space operations officer at echelon. The ARSSTs are a low-density,
high-demand deployable team.
4-15. An ARSST’s primary function is to deploy and integrate with a unit’s staff to provide direct support.
The team provides the commander and staff with situational understanding of the space domain. An ARSST
acts in direct support to Army divisions, corps, joint task force, Marine Expeditionary Forces, theater
sustainment command, and Army service component command headquarters, and may be deployed to
support an SSE. The ARSST’s expertise of space capabilities and the ability to produce products significantly
contribute to current and future operations. An ARSST team may be tailored in a variety of ways to fulfill a
request for forces.

ARMY HEADQUARTERS, CORPS AND DIVISION

CORPS AND DIVISION
4-16. The corps is the focal point for the planning and execution of space operations. The corps is the
principal integrator of space capabilities in support of unified land operations. Each corps contains an organic
SSE, usually assigned to the movement and maneuver cell. The SSE plans, coordinates, integrates, and
synchronizes space capabilities into operations for corps, division, and subordinate units. For space planning,
all land component coordination runs up to the corps headquarters. The SSE coordinates directly with other
space staffs and SCA for support to meet corps requirements.
4-17. The primary tactical warfighting headquarters is the division. The primary task of the division
headquarters is to direct the operations of its subordinate brigade combat teams and supporting brigades.
Each division contains an organic SSE, usually assigned to the movement and maneuver cell in the current
operations section. The SSE plans, coordinates, and integrates space capabilities into operations for division
and subordinate units.
4-18. Division SSEs contain the resources necessary to be an Army forces headquarters during the conduct
of a crisis response or limited contingency operations without additional Army augmentation.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-3

Chapter 4

RESPONSIBILITIES AND COORDINATION

4-19. The coordination responsibilities at the corps includes all staff sections and workgroups formed ad-
hoc. The SSE avoids providing unilateral answers about space capabilities pertaining to other command staffs
who have complementary expertise, such as answering a SATCOM-specific question when the answer is
clearly an Army G-6 responsibility. In all cases, the SSE coordinates space operations with the appropriate
command and staff.
4-20. The SSE maintains awareness of the total space picture and has in-depth understanding of space
operational elements, such as the joint force commander with SCA and supporting staff. The SSE maintains
contact with other space teams, such as the higher, adjacent, and subordinate unit SSEs, ARSSTs, Army
space coordinating elements, theater missile warning detachments, and other teams such as national
intelligence support teams and sister Service space capabilities. The SSE pursues direct liaison authority
communications as needed, but not already directed. Gaining necessary SSA requires the SSE to network
actively within the space community which is dynamic and different from theater to theater. SSEs and
ARSSTs routinely coordinate with the Combined Space Operations Center (known as the CSpOC) and the
National Space Defense Center.
4-21. To properly execute assigned tasks, the SSE must understand the mission, maintains situational
understanding of the mission, and challenges the unit faces. The SSE must be prepared to offer space-related
solutions as situations change.
4-22. The SSE conducts planning to integrate space capabilities, support the MDMP, and develops
Appendix 18–Space Operations to Annex C of the base order. Commanders and staffs use Appendix 18–
Space Operations to Annex C to describe how space operations support the concept of operations described
in the base plan or order. The SSE is fully involved in the process, flow of information, and decisions in the
headquarters. The SSE works closely with the entire staff to ensure space capabilities and effects are
optimized to all warfighting functions. However, the majority of the SSE’s time is focused on the intelligence
cell, fires cell, movement and maneuver cell, the cyberspace electromagnetic activity workgroup, electronic
warfare cell, and the G-6 section at the Theater Army level (or equivalent staff sections at corps and division)
because these staffs rely most heavily on space capabilities. The enemy space assessment portion is included
in Annex B –Intelligence. This is the responsibility of the G-2 and is developed with input from the space
planner.
4-23. Commanders leverage space capabilities and effects as part of combined arms operations to achieve
objectives in all domains, through lethal and nonlethal means. Commanders must be aware of impacts from
space operations at all times. Commanders’ staff should:
 Include space operations within the operations process and MDMP.
 Understand and consider the legal implications, operational authorities, opportunities, and risks
presented for space operations. Legal counsel participates during all stages of space operation
planning and execution, assessing compliance with applicable legal requirements and providing
guidance as required.
 Understand the implications of space operations on the mission and scheme of maneuver.
 Understand how the selected COA may affect the prioritization of space assets.
 Identify critical missions or tasks by phase to enable identification of key space capabilities and
vulnerabilities.
 Approve high-priority target lists, target nominations, collection priorities, and risk mitigation
measures for operation in the space domain.
 Create massed effects by synchronizing space operations with lethal and nonlethal actions to
support the concept of operations.

BOARDS, BUREAUS, CENTERS, CELLS, AND WORKGROUPS

4-24. A unit’s battle rhythm should consider space operations and activities, especially when the focus area
of the meeting involves reliance on space capabilities. Within division and higher headquarters, the space
operations officer supports a variety of standing and ah-hoc workgroups, including the following:

4-4 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations

 Lethal and nonlethal targeting workgroup;

 Intelligence cell;
 Movement and maneuver cell;
 Fires cell;
 Air and missile defense section;
 Signal operations;
 Network operations;
 Cyberspace electromagnetic activities workgroup;
 Information operations workgroup;
 Special technical operations workgroup;
 Electronic warfare cell; and
 Staff weather officer
4-25. For all boards, workgroups, planning teams, staff planning, and staff estimates efforts, there should
be a synchronized working relationship to ensure all offensive and defensive space operations are addressed,
assessed, and included in all operations.

CONSIDERATIONS
4-26. Commanders ethically, effectively, and efficiently employ space capabilities to shape the
environment and support offensive and defensive operations. Commanders plan, integrate, and synchronize
space capabilities as a unified effort to project power.
4-27. Army space operations officers provide and integrate SSA throughout the supported staff, and
incorporates available space capabilities from planning through mission execution. Space operations officers
use their expertise to integrate space capabilities, support staff efforts, and utilize software applications to
provide relevant plans. Space planners integrate SSA across the staff to enhance the commander’s
understanding and to shape operations. SSA allows for predictive information in the space OE.
4-28. Not all unified action partners have the same degree of dependencies on space operations; therefore,
not all unified action partners share the same level of proficiency conducting space operations. Partner
nation’s dependencies on the space operations varies widely and some militaries may have limited experience
conducting space operations. At the least integrated scale, some forces may only own and use handheld GNSS
devices. It is imperative for Army space operations officer to understand they will likely interact with some
Soldiers from allied and partner nations who require a basic level of training to effectively communicate
plans which have integrated space capabilities.
4-29. Expectation management of space capabilities is vital. Over-selling space capabilities may lead to
mission failure. For example, space asset limitations are mostly physics driven. Products from space assets
in a LEO are based upon revisit times and asset allocation considerations. Some allied militaries may not be
well versed in space fundamentals. It is important to emphasize to commanders and their staff they may not
have priority for a desired capability, because the space assets are often national systems or commercially
owned and priorities are set by other bodies. Space operations officers may be more informative if they advise
commanders and their staff obtaining satellite resources is similar to the procedures used for prioritizing
artillery fires and intelligence collection requests.
4-30. Space planners must focus mission analysis over a widespread, geographically diverse area. Space
operation planning must provide tailored information which supports operations ranging from small surgical
strikes to theater-wide operations.
4-31. Space planners must be aware of how space capabilities support the commander’s intent to help
facilitate a successful end state. While conducting operational planning, staff sections focus on how their
section may influence the battle. Assessed into space operations only after being branch qualified, space
planners have a unique perspective how space capabilities affect each function area and overall mission. They
support the staff sections by advising each section on the best use of space capabilities and effects. They
should attend all applicable planning workgroups to provide expertise on how space operations may support
other functions. Space planners must be proactive and adaptive to find solutions to mitigate gaps. They

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-5

Chapter 4

provide expertise in all space capabilities and should be involved in all aspects of current and future
operations.
4-32. The decentralized nature of space operations, combined with multi-use resources drives a wide span
of coordination for space planners. Successful space operations rely on collaboration and the rapid exchange
of information with all staff sections.
4-33. Decision-making during operations includes executing space operations as planned, adjusting space
operations to an unexpected enemy actions. The space planner challenge is to assess how changes in space
operations activities affect the overall mission and to determine necessary follow-on actions.
4-34. Monitoring space operations focuses principally on maintaining the effectiveness of space
capabilities. Space planners use the critical assets list to monitor the status of critical friendly space
capabilities and the status of critical terrestrial, aerial, and space systems. As mission operations unfold, space
capabilities and tasks are modified to provide effective support.
4-35. Space effects may require proximity to a target to implement. If commanders determine there is a
need for space effects, the space planner determines where the capability reside. The space planner uses the
space support request to request space effects if the resource does not exist in the unit or its supporting forces.
4-36. Some space capabilities, effects, and related activities require a long lead-time for planning and
preparation. Proper space planning for the mission must account for long lead times so the space planner can
ensure the desired capability or effects are available to be incorporate into mission operations.
4-37. The space planner develops the space operations mission statement and concept of space operations.
The space mission statement and space concept of operation emphasizes aspects of the base plan that require
space capabilities and effects. The space planner identifies space capabilities required to support operations
and risks to the mission without them.
4-38. The space operations officer provides the Appendix 18–Space Operations to Annex C of the base
order for all operational plans within the supported unit’s area of operations. Appendix 18 is the space
appendix to the OPLAN or operation order (OPORD) that directs and notifies units on the conduct of space
operations for specific missions. Commanders and staffs may use Appendix 18 to identify how space
operations support the base plan or order. The enemy space assessment portion is included in Annex B–
Intelligence. This is the responsibility of the G-2 and is developed with input from the space planner.
4-39. Space planners must consider the impact of space operations on each warfighting function. This
includes an assessment of current and predicted statuses and availability of all space capabilities and effects.
Assessments include counterspace tactics employed and targeting options planned on both sides of the battle.
Failure to include space capabilities, limitations, and the expectation of D3SOE during mission assessment
may lead to an inaccurate risk assessment for the mission.
4-40. The relationship between the space domain and the cyber domain is unique. Many cyberspace
operations depend on space—a critical portion of cyberspace can only be provided via space operations—as
cyberspace operations are enabled by the space domain and the space operations. Cyberspace provides the
means by which space control and transmission of space sensor data are conducted. Some space capabilities
such as NAVWAR are dependent upon operations from both domains. This interrelationship is critical and
the linkages must be addressed during all phases of planning and operations to ensure synergy between space
operations and cyberspace operations.

FUTURE OPERATIONS CONSIDERATIONS

4-41. The future operations cell monitors current operations and determines implications for operations
within the mid-range planning horizon. In addition, it focuses on adjustments to the current operation,
including the maneuvering of forces in depth to facilitate continuation of the current operation. All staff
sections assist with planning future operations. Future operations serve as a bridge between the plans and
current operations integration cells. In coordination with the current operations integration cell, the future
operations cell assesses whether it must modify planned operation to achieve the current phase’s objectives.
Future operations participates in the targeting workgroup. The future operations cell updates and adds details

4-6 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations

to the branch plans foreseen in the current operation and prepares orders necessary to implement a sequel to
the operation.
4-42. A running estimate is the continuous assessment of the current situation used to determine if the
current operation is proceeding according to the commander’s intent and if planned future operations are
supportable (ADP 5-0). Failure to maintain accurate running estimates may lead to errors or omissions by
future operations which may result in flawed plans and bad decisions during execution. Running estimates
always include recommendations for current and anticipated decisions affecting friendly and enemy forces.
It is the responsibility of the space operations officer to maintain a space running estimate.
4-43. The space running estimate provides the means to conduct space effects tracking and assessment
throughout the battle. The space running estimate provides plans and tactics for the protection of space
capabilities and enemy countermeasures. This includes new facts and assumptions, as the situation changes
and the operation proceeds. New facts and assumptions generate conclusions, and recommendations for the
commander in terms of how space capabilities influence and impact the mission.
4-44. Space operations officers develop and maintain the space running estimate. For echelons below
division, units may rely on the higher command’s space operations officers to provide the space running
estimate. The space running estimate describes how space influences and impacts mission at echelons of
brigade and below. The space running estimate is not a standalone staff estimate, but rather a series of
estimates, which support, and is integrated into the staff estimates of other staff elements.
4-45. The information maintained within the space running estimate supports the unit’s ability to perform
command and control, information collection, target development, targeting, movement and maneuver, and
battle damage assessment. Examples of information tracked within the space running estimate includes but
is not be limited to:
 Type, quantity, status, intentions, tactics, and known or suspected locations of threat GPS and
SATCOM jammers (active and inactive). This information supports the G-2’s ability to develop
and maintain, the enemy electronic order of battle which sets the conditions for the development,
refinement, and assessment of the information collection plan and the development of lethal and
non-lethal targeting options for the commander.
 Ongoing or anticipated areas impacted by GPS jammers and the corresponding effects on GPS-
enabled equipment such as:
o FFT devices, radios, and unmanned aircraft systems;
o GPS-aided precision guided munitions;
o GPS-aided target acquisition systems;
 Ongoing or anticipated areas impacted by SATCOM jammers and the corresponding effects on
SATCOM and SATCOM-enabled equipment such as:
o Warfighter information network–tactical;
o Joint Battle Command-Platform;
o Command post of the future;
o Force XXI battle command, brigade and below; and
o U.S. Marine Corps joint capabilities release.
 Ongoing or predicted impacts of terrestrial and space weather effects on GPS; SATCOM; space-
based surveillance and reconnaissance; and missile warning systems, platforms, and architectures.
 Satellite reconnaissance advanced notice reports provide predicted overflights of enemy satellites
by type/sensor and associated surveillance and reconnaissance tasking over friendly area of
operations to the staff.
 Predicted periods when GPS is degraded and the impacts on GPS guidance accuracies and
employment times/locations of GPS aided munitions. This information is assessed using
positional dilution of precision values in charts and graphs, and directly supports fires by assessing
the proper employment of precision guided munitions at specific times and locations.
 Assessments of the adversary’s reliance on organic, commercial, or third-party space capabilities
such as SATCOM; space surveillance and reconnaissance; GNSS; and environmental monitoring.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-7

Chapter 4

 Availability and status of known enemy’s GPS and SATCOM jamming capability and the impacts
from these capabilities.
 Battle damage assessment from lethal and non-lethal attacks against threat use of space domain.
This supports follow-on requirements for target reengagement options for the commander, and
ongoing staff assessment efforts.
 Friendly, neutral, and enemy space order of battle (in coordination with staff G-2).
 Critical asset list and defended asset list.
4-46. Examples of how portions of the space running estimate may support other warfighting functions and
their respective staff estimates include, but are not limited to:
 The G-2’s intelligence estimate for space intelligence, threat electronic order of battle (type,
quantity, vulnerabilities, disposition/ location, tactics, intent of jammers), information collection
issues, current and predicted enemy actions against U.S. space capabilities (such as threat
jamming operations), ongoing impacts (manmade or naturally occurring) on GPS and SATCOM-
enabled information collection and or national surveillance and reconnaissance platforms.
 The G-2’s weather estimate/staff weather officer for terrestrial and or space weather and its
impacts on operations, especially those relying on space capabilities such as SATCOM, GPS,
missile warning, or space surveillance and reconnaissance.
 The G-3’s operations estimate. The G-3 is the staff proponent for several information related
capabilities to include, but not limited to cyberspace, electronic warfare, and space operations.
The G-3 maintains cyberspace effects. They addresses threat activities designed to deny, degrade,
or disrupt space-enabled command and control systems.
 The G-3’s protection estimate, air and missile defense cell for missile warning, space-based
infrared sensor information, and how degradation of space capabilities influence or impact
protection efforts.
 The G-3’s fires estimate. Use of GPS-aided munitions, employment of unmanned aerial systems
for reconnaissance, surveillance, and or attack missions, employment of GPS-enabled field
artillery firing platforms, and impacts on GPS-enabled target acquisition systems. This estimate
supports input to the attack guidance matrix and or the target synchronization matrix.
 The G-6’s signal estimate also includes SATCOM, GPS, and the way in which degradation of
these capabilities influences or impacts command and control efforts. In addition, the signal
estimate includes D3SOE effects and equities as they pertain to spectrum management operations,
NAVWAR considerations, space domain equities represented within the joint restricted frequency
list, and the status and trends noted from joint spectrum interference resolution reporting.

CURRENT OPERATIONS CONSIDERATIONS

4-47. The current operations integration cell is the focal point for controlling the execution of operations.
This involves assessing the current situation while regulating forces in accordance with commander’s intent,
the mission, and concept of operations. The chief of operations or assistant G-3 leads this cell. Elements or
watch officers from each staff section and liaison officers from subordinate and adjacent units form this cell.
All staff sections have representation within the current operations integration cell either permanently, or as
required. The current operations integration cell displays the COP and conducts shift changes, assessments,
and other briefings as required. It provides information on the status of operations to all staff members and
to higher, subordinate, and adjacent units. The current operations integration cell conducts short-range
planning and conducts the operations synchronization meeting.
4-48. The current operations integration cell typically tracks ongoing and upcoming operations out to 24
hours. They rely on their tactical standard operating procedures to guide operations and the accomplishment
of tasks. Some standard operating procedure items include PACE plans and battle drills. Both PACE plans
and battle drills should include steps, processes, and considerations associated with operating in a D3SOE.
4-49. PACE plans are a key requirement for SATCOM planning. A PACE plan establishes the primary,
secondary, tertiary, and emergency methods of communications for each warfighting function, typically from
higher to lower echelons. Establishing a PACE plan requires care to ensure a secondary or tertiary method
of communications does not rely on the primary equipment. PACE plan should be as simple as possible, yet

4-8 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations

it should maintain flexibility to provide communications support as reliably as possible during dynamic
operations.
4-50. Some unit PACE plans, especially with regard to operating in D3SOE conditions, may include but
are not limited to:
 Communications. The Army relies heavily on SATCOM as the primary means to move large
volumes of data securely and over great distances. When select SATCOM systems are denied,
degraded, or disrupted, alternate systems such as other line of sight systems, land-lines, and
manual methods (such as runners) should be employed.
 FFT. Units should consider and train on how to maintain situational understanding of units using
beyond line of sight SATCOM, line of sight communications, and analog methods of unit location
and status tracking.
 Battle damage assessment. A unit’s ability to conduct battle damage assessment often relies on
unmanned aircraft system or National Reconnaissance Office overhead systems to collect post-
strike information. Units should consider other means such as manned aircraft, ground forces
using local drones, and multiple communication means to report data back to higher headquarters.
An emergency method for battle damage assessment might be pre-positioned troops—equipped
with radios—able to observe a deliberate strike and report back to higher headquarters.
 Precision engagement. In a D3SOE, the fires should be prepared to support and employ multiple
types of munitions providing the greatest accuracies available. Commanders and staffs should
have PACE plans to achieve the best precision under less-than-optimal tactical conditions.
 Target acquisition. Primary target acquisition often involves the use of unmanned aerial systems,
National Reconnaissance Office overhead systems, radars, laser designation systems, and forward
observers using SATCOM reporting means. Commanders and staffs should develop PACE plans
with the expectation friendly forces will operate in a D3SOE.
 Information collection. Many joint information collection assets rely on GPS, SATCOM, and
National Reconnaissance Office overhead systems capabilities. As GPS, SATCOM, and National
Reconnaissance Office overhead systems become denied, degraded, and disrupted, commanders
and staffs should develop PACE plans on how best to develop and execute their information
collection plans to support the commander’s priority intelligence requirements in support of
decision points, high-value target lists, and high-payoff target lists.
 Manned and unmanned aerial systems rely, in part, on both GPS and SATCOM for data sharing,
platform tracking, target acquisition, and command and control. Commanders and staffs should
have PACE plans developed and ready to implement to continue flights, operations, target
acquisition, reconnaissance and surveillance, and command and control for when GPS and or
SATCOM systems become denied, degraded, or disrupted.
 Total asset visibility. Many Army sustainment units primarily rely upon both GPS and SATCOM
systems to conduct command and control, and share logistical information between units. As GPS
or SATCOM systems become denied, degraded, or disrupted, commanders and staffs should
develop PACE plans on how best to continually share logistical information by means other than
SATCOM thus using other means such as alternate SATCOM systems, line of sight radios, or
runners.
 Missile warning and space-based infrared sensors. Force protection requirements against peer
forces who are likely to employ a wide variety and large quantity of ballistic missiles require
Army forces to develop PACE plans. These PACE plans should cover the detection of missile
launches and static infrared activity, warning to downrange forces, characterization, and geo-
location for each detected event when GPS, SATCOM, space surveillance and reconnaissance
sensors, and select warning systems and architectures are denied, degraded, or disrupted.

UNIFIED LAND OPERATIONS USE OF SPACE CAPABILITIES

4-51. Commanders apply combat power through one or a combination of warfighting functions using
leadership and information to fulfill the mission. According to ADP 3-0, the definition of a warfighting
function is, “a group of tasks and systems united by a common purpose that commanders use to accomplish
missions and training objectives.” Army warfighting functions provide a framework for commanders to

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-9

Chapter 4

visualize how grouped tasks and systems will be used to accomplish the mission. All Army warfighting
functions are enabled and enhanced by space capabilities. It is within the framework of the warfighting
functions many space operations dependencies are identified.
4-52. Within the Army, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and environmental monitoring are
areas conducted by intelligence and are executed with the authority and oversight of the headquarters,
Department of the Army G-2. Space operations enable intelligence operations, but are also dependent upon
intelligence to provide space reconnaissance, surveillance, and intelligence products.

COMMAND AND CONTROL

4-53. Command and control depends on space capabilities and effects to command forces, control
operations, drive the operations process, and establish the command and control system. Army space
operations support the command and control warfighting function and enables a commander to command the
force. A large percentage of the information required to drive the operations process for employment of
ground forces are obtained from space assets. The COP supports control of forces by empowering subordinate
leaders to be granted greater freedom of action and independence to facilitate initiative and agility to
accomplish the commander’s overall intent. The SSEs ensure space capabilities are integrated into plans at
all echelons during the operations process and space systems vulnerabilities are assessed for risks to mission
execution. Refer to ADP 6-0 for discussions on the command and control warfighting function.
4-54. Army space operations are integrated throughout the command and control warfighting function to
complement and reinforce the other five warfighting functions. Various space capabilities and effects are
used to facilitate the decision making process for command and control.
 SSA is critical to controlling operations and driving the operations process. SSA characterizes the
space OE, identifies adversary likely use of space capabilities, adversary threats to friendly space
capabilities, and provides insight to understand adversary intent. Space assets enable the MDMP
through analysis (supported by space surveillance and reconnaissance) and COA development.
 PNT provides extremely accurate timing critical to tactical and theater networks. FFT information
feeds the COP with current unit position data, to help ensure planners have the most up to date
location information, and helps avoid fratricide by ensuring adjacent friendly force formations
have accurate positional data on each other.
 Space control provides assurance to commanders they will be able to communicate with their staff
over extended distances, control operations, and drive the operations process. Thorough space
control integration during the planning process helps make certain that friendly forces have
assured access to space capabilities, and that offensive space control planning is considered in
order to deny adversaries access to space.
 SATCOM enables inter-theater and intra-theater communications while satellite operations help
commanders to establish command and control systems and drive the operations process.
SATCOM provides secure, integrated communications to all echelons to ensure mission orders
and commander’s intent are clearly and securely conveyed to all Soldiers. SATCOM on-the-move
allows a commander to maintain connectivity during rapidly evolving operations, while the space
enabled COP provides a clear picture of the operational situation. Space enabled command and
control systems provide a clear COP of the battle to a commander who can move to the best
position to assess, direct, and lead. SATCOM is the backbone of the global information grid,
which enables command and control and supports mission operations. Warning orders, OPORD,
and graphics are often provided through space enabled automated systems and displayed on
multiple COP displays.
 Missile Warning and space-based infrared sensors contribute to effective command and control,
and support to the planning process. Missile warning enables commanders to know when they are
under direct missile attack and to maintain command of their forces.
 Environmental monitoring provides commanders with information that may affect military
operations, enabling forces to take advantage of adverse environmental conditions or avoid
situations negatively impacting their ability to maneuver.
 Space-based surveillance and reconnaissance enables command and control by providing satellite
collections of enemy forces throughout the depth of the battlespace. Space-based surveillance and

4-10 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations

reconnaissance is critical in an area of operations where manned aircraft, unmanned aerial

systems, and terrestrial intelligence collection are limited by enemy A2 and AD efforts.

MOVEMENT AND MANEUVER

4-55. Space capabilities are a critical facilitator of movement and maneuver operations. All echelons—
from theater to company level and below are dependent on space capabilities when executing movement and
maneuver. A loss of space capabilities during large scale combat operations means the Army would revert to
more conventional operate style. Communications, battle tracking, precise navigation, timely intelligence
and many other modern warfare expectations are disrupted.
4-56. Army space operations support the movement and maneuver warfighting function and provides the
units with the capabilities to enable rapid movement thereby providing an advantage to friendly forces.
Various space capabilities are used to facilitate the decision making process for movement and maneuver.
Refer to ADP 3-0 for discussions on movement and maneuver warfighting function.
 SSA provides insight to understanding adversary intent and movement, which allows U.S. and
joint forces more time to place joint forces in a position of advantage.
 PNT provides enhanced navigational accuracy in featureless or obscured environments, supports
high speed maneuver for positional advantage, and provides accurate location and timing critical
to tactical missions. It helps set accurate air corridors and allows aircraft greater ability to follow
established corridors. FFT adds a level of fidelity useful to a commander gaining situational
understanding when making decisions impacting movement and maneuver of friendly unit
positions and fosters timely adjustments to operational plans. FFT capabilities helps mitigate
fratricide due to unprecedented knowledge of all joint and allied forces via the COP.
 Space Control. DSC and NAVWAR fosters assured, uninterrupted PNT and take measures to
protect friendly force access to space capabilities. DSC can help locate enemy electronic warfare
and counterspace capabilities. OSC can assist in operations to deny the enemy use of space
capabilities, and protect friendly access to the same.
 SATCOM enables communications on-the-move in areas of limited line of sight communications
and allows commanders to communicate beyond line of sight to subordinate elements regardless
of the distance from the commander’s location. SATCOM allows for commanders and their staff
to have current information on subordinate units locations, status, disposition, and provide
operational planning guidance to adjust to rapidly evolving tactical situations. Systems such as
the Soldier Network Extension and Point of Presence provide tactical commanders with
SATCOM capability while stationary or on-the-move.
 Missile warning provides known launch locations with kinematic access and predicted impact
points when specific launches are detected. Missile Warning provides timely threat warning of
inbound missile and other high energy enemy capabilities and assists in planning for how
maneuver formations, command posts, sustainment facilities, and other friendly forces will be
positioned on the battlefield. Well-positioned forces helps increase timely warning so troops have
sufficient time to take reactive measures to a threat missile event.
 Environmental monitoring provides the commander with information that may affect military
operations, enabling forces to take advantage of adverse environmental conditions, or avoid
situations negatively impacting their ability to maneuver.
 Space-based imagery and geospatial information provide visualization of terrain for actual and
planned missions, and helps identify obstacles and the most likely movement corridors.

INTELLIGENCE
4-57. Intelligence depends on space capabilities and effects to provide intelligence support to force
generation, provide support to situational understanding, conduct information collection, and provide
intelligence support to targeting and information operations.
4-58. Space-based sensors providing critical input for the production of intelligence. Space-based sensors
gather information concerning relevant OE, as well as provide positional relationship of threat forces during

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-11

Chapter 4

operations. Refer to ADP 3-0 for discussions on the intelligence warfighting function and ADP 2-0 for
information about intelligence.
 Geospatial intelligence provides imagery to support planning, combat assessment, situational
awareness, and cartography. The various geospatial intelligence remote sensing phenomenology
such as synthetic aperture radar, infrared, electro-optical, and multispectral provides planners with
current information on surface, subsurface and air conditions such as trafficability, port
accessibility, beach conditions, vegetation, change detection, land use, and foundational military
intelligence such as detailed knowledge of enemy forces, facilities, disposition, capabilities, and
support to target material development.
 PNT is necessary for intelligence sensors to work optimally. PNT provides the precision for ortho-
rectified imagery, report enemy locations accurately, and provide a variety of necessary terrestrial
and space weather data. Both manned and unmanned aerial intelligence sensors utilize PNT to
navigate autonomously and to focus the sensors.
 SATCOM provides the link for direct communications and dissemination of intelligence products.
 Missile warning and space-based infrared sensors may provide indicators of enemy unit locations
and intentions.
 Space surveillance and reconnaissance provides detailed knowledge of enemy forces, locations,
capabilities, activity, and battle damage assessment, throughout the depths of the battlespace.

FIRES
4-59. Fires depends on all space capabilities to deliver and integrate all forms of Army, joint, and
multinational fires, and conduct targeting. Refer to ADP 3-0 for discussions on the fires warfighting function
and ADP 3-19 for information about fires.
4-60. Army space operations are integrated throughout the fires warfighting function and include space
capabilities which provide robust and reliable geolocation and communications capabilities. PNT supports
precision targeting and precision munitions. SATCOM enables real time communications between
commanders and forces to enable immediate redirection of fires over extended distances to shape the
operations. Weather satellites provide a variety of data points necessary for targeting impacts.
 PNT provides precise positioning data to firing units and feeds the COP so firing units are aware
of friendly unit locations. PNT enables accuracy reports for precision guided munitions, Army
battle command system, near real-time situational awareness for lethal and nonlethal fires, proper
application of fires for proportionality, and reduced collateral damage and FFT fratricide. PNT
supports the targeting of enemy forces in contact, integration into fires planning, and the use of
precision guided munitions against high value targets.
 SATCOM provides timely BLOS communications between different echelons of firing elements.
Command and Control, Intelligence, and Sustainment functions support to fires all rely on
SATCOM. SATCOM and PNT supports fires targeting through interfaces on systems like the
Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System.
 Space assets foster access to deep attack with GPS aided systems such as Army Tactical Missile
System by confirming and geolocating target in denied areas
 Missile warning indications can provide a possible footprint of adversary indirect fire activity
which may include integrated air defense and multiple rocket launcher systems.
 Environmental monitoring provides data on surface and sub-surface conditions, which provides
important mission planning data in support of fires operations.
 Space-based surveillance and reconnaissance contributes to developing the deep picture of enemy
unit locations and dispositions—supporting fires deep targeting efforts. In large scale combat
operations, Space-based surveillance and reconnaissance may be in position to collect against
enemy tactical level targets.

SUSTAINMENT
4-61. Sustainment depends on space capabilities and effects for logistics (maintenance, transportation,
supply, field services, distribution, general engineering), personnel services (human resources, financial

4-12 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations

management, legal, religious), and health service support mission sets of casually care, medical evacuation,
and logistics. Army space operations support the sustainment warfighting function include facilitating real-
time data transfer and visibility for an expeditionary Army. Refer to ADP 3-0 for discussions on the
sustainment warfighting function and ADP 4-0 for information about sustainment.
4-62. Various space capabilities are used to facilitate the implementation and decision making process for
sustainment.
 SSA helps clarify threat actor intent to foster protection of critical sustainment efforts.
 PNT provides precise location of in-transit vessels enabling hyper-accurate delivery forecasts of
resupply efforts shipped to theater. Enables precision engineer operations and infrastructure
construction such as airfields, ports, landing zone identification, operating bases, petroleum
pipelines, bridges, and minefields. The combat survivor/evader locator radio has en embedded
PNT receiver device to facilitate location finding and search and rescue operations. PNT data is
critical in providing the Sustainment COP with a clear picture of all friendly force locations and
status. The efficient movement of Sustainment forces over large distances of the air, land, and sea
lines of communications is most often dependent upon PNT to ensure elements arrive on schedule,
with minimum time in transit.
 SATCOM provides important beyond line of sight communications for real time connectivity to
the Sustainment COP, allowing for a clear and complete picture of the location and disposition of
Sustainment forces across large geographic areas. SATCOM provides reachback for condition-
based maintenance, minimizing down time and reducing both maintenance and labor costs.
SATCOM linking theaters is fundamental to timely, assured, and responsive support to the
sustainment force. SATCOM enables reachback to technical centers and libraries, and provides
beyond line of sight network extension. It allows tactical level G4 staffs to coordinate logistic
requirements from deployed locations to anywhere in the world and for Sustainment planning
staffs to receive timely battlefield updates, and update their operational plans as appropriate.
 SATCOM and PNT are critical to beyond line of sight control and information transfer from
unmanned aerial systems reliant on near-continuous data exchange from controllers. They enable
engineering tools such as Tele-engineering Communications Equipment for reachback,
Automated Route Reconnaissance Kit for route reconnaissance information, and Geospatial
Assessment Tool for Engineering Reachback for field data collection and geographic mapping.
Topographic engineers and geospatial planning cells require access to the space-enabled global
information grid to update and disseminate geospatial information and products. Medical records
can be tracked and shared through the continuum of a deployment—from point of injury to the
sustaining base. Casualty location can be accurately identified and tracked for trends.
 GPS, SATCOM, and imagery enable the collection and sharing of information on geography,
supplies, services, facilities, and transportation activities.
 Space control helps to counter adversaries from jamming communications and PNT signals.
 Missile warning supports early warning and force protection for Sustainment units operating
through the depth of the battlespace. Well-positioned forces helps increase timely warning so
sustainment troops have sufficient time to take reactive measures to a threat missile event.
 Weather and terrain data helps determine scatter patterns for chemical, biological, and
radiological agents, and modeling of hazard predictions to support medical services or health
services.
 Space surveillance and reconnaissance can provide information on movement corridors, convoy
monitoring, supply routes, and assists force protection by providing warning of enemy activity.
They help identify weapon stockpiles, target identification, delivery systems, and dual use
facilities. It identifies natural obstacles and provides detailed terrain information such as digital
terrain elevation data. Combined with GPS, the information can be used for assessment of local
utilities, land use, reservoirs, roads and bridges.

PROTECTION
4-63. The protection warfighting function is a continuous process executed by all commanders, regardless
of mission, location, or threat. It consists of a broad set of unit specific, coordinated actions conducted to

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-13

Chapter 4

protect the force. Protection depends on space capabilities and effects for survivability operations; air and
missile defense support; physical security; anti-terrorism; personnel recovery operations; explosive ordnance
disposal; risk management; chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear defense; cyberspace security and
defense; and electromagnetic protection. Army space operations support the protection warfighting function
supporting freedom of action in all domains preserving the commander’s freedom of action and protecting
the forces. With situational understanding, commanders have information necessary to respond to given
situations such as personnel recovery operations. Refer to ADP 3-0 for discussions on the protection
warfighting function and ADP 3-37 for information about protection.
4-64. Space capabilities are used for the implementation and decision making process for protection.
 SSA can inform friendly forces of adversary satellites when they are in position to view and record
ground activity.
 PNT is important to protection to accurately identifying threats such as minefields, obstacles, and
other potential hazards to friendly forces. PNT enables FFT, assists in personnel recovery
operations, helps troops by reducing fratricide, and enables protection through situational
awareness.
 SATCOM provides the ability to transport data to all levels of command, expands the area of
operations beyond line of sight, and improves situational understanding for all as SATCOM feeds
the COP to ensure situational awareness is available for all components. It provides timely
dissemination of friendly force unit locations and dispositions, which greatly assists in fratricide
avoidance, and dissemination of information related to all types of threats. The SATCOM
 DSC and NAVWAR fosters assured, uninterrupted PNT.
 Space-based missile warning provides launch locations, predicted missile impact points, and
warning to forces within the footprint of the predicted impact area to take protective actions.
 Environmental monitoring provides information on surface and sub-surface conditions and
environmental data. Weather and terrain data helps determine scatter patterns for chemical,
biological, and radiological agents, and modeling of hazard predictions to support force
protection. It can help provide potential decontamination sites, water sources, drainage, routes,
cover and concealment, and imagery of environmental disasters.
 Intelligence gathered from space-based surveillance and reconnaissance assists force protection
by providing known launch locations, likely launch vehicles and associated kinematic ranges, and
likely warheads. Surveillance and reconnaissance enables access to denied areas to help detect
enemy camouflage and obscurants. It can be used to help determine likelihood of adversary
attacks using airborne agents and help determine friendly and enemy use of obscurants.

SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES

4-65. The joint special operations task force has a space operation cell with Army space operations officers
assigned who are trained to plan, coordinate, and integrate space capabilities in their respective missions
operations.

ARMY-WIDE SPACE TRAINING CONSIDERATIONS

4-66. An enemy who is able to contest the space domain and force D3SOE conditions will be able to
provide some level of disruption to every mission. Enemy forces may be equipped to employ theater-wide
D3SOE effects which are part of an A2 and AD strategy. Even small factions and individual threat actors
could cause enough D3SOE to have significant impacts on mission accomplishment.
4-67. Experiencing D3SOE effects may hamper mission operations and information operations. Unit
training and staff exercises must regularly include a D3SOE. Repetitive training in D3SOE conditions is
essential for all units to become competent while operating with reduced space capabilities.
4-68. Training prepares Soldiers to conduct operations according to doctrine, standard operating
procedures, and the unit’s mission. Training develops the teamwork, trust, and mutual understanding
commanders need to exercise command and control to achieve unity of effort. Training must be presented in

4-14 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations

realistic environments, including a D3SOE so Soldiers can practice the techniques necessary to adapt and
overcome enemies in large scale combat operations.
4-69. The Army space training strategy covers both operational and institutional aspects of training. The
operational piece focuses on providing real-world conditions during unit training to counter D3SOE during
multi-echelon home station training and combat training centers. Training efforts are focused on ensuring
operational units can initiate and maintain access to space capabilities and tactics to apply when operating in
contested conditions. Using training devices to replicate D3SOE conditions is critical to providing realistic
operational training, especially for PNT and SATCOM. Direct injection devices allow a large maneuver,
fires, or other audience to experience D3SOE effects on their space-enabled systems during training and
exercises. These training devices realistically replicate the effects of D3SOE, and they are critical for
implementing this training.

SECTION II – JOINT SPACE OPERATIONS

4-70. JP 3-14 lays the foundation of joint space doctrine by establishing principles for the integrated
employment of space capabilities. It also recognizes the Service components have both complementary but
distinct space responsibilities. Each Service component contributes to an integrated whole synchronized by
the joint force headquarters. Space forces employ principles of joint operations and enable the application of
the principles by other joint forces. Army space operations support the joint force commander’s campaign
plan. Army space operations support joint force missions and receive support from joint forces and other
Service, government, civil, and commercial space assets. Based on unit mission, space operations are
integrated throughout the land component forces and other components of the joint force to maximize the
space contribution to the joint fight.
4-71. Common responsibilities of each of the Service components are:
 Advocate for space requirements within their respective Services;
 Provide a single service point of contact for access to Service resources and capabilities;
 Make recommendations to combatant commanders on appropriate employment of Service forces;
 Provide space forces to combatant commanders as directed;
 Support planning of space operations and assigned tasking; and
 Support all combatant commanders with expertise in space capabilities and advocacy of desired
capabilities as requested.
4-72. Service components have distinctly unique roles to play in providing space capabilities. The distinctly
Army space-specific, roles are identified in JP 3-14, but are summarized below:
 Conduct space operations and provides planning, integration, control and coordination of Army
forces and capabilities in support of combatant command missions;
 Provides FFT;
 Provide ballistic missile warning from deployed JTAGS;
 Provide space expertise with ARSSTs;
 Conduct SATCOM planning by RSSC;
 Conduct communication transmissions and satellite payload control of the wideband satellite
constellations, and support to SSA; and
 The Consolidated SATCOM System Expert for military wideband, military narrowband
SATCOM, and the specific SATCOM System Expert for the DSCS, WGS, Global Broadcast
Service, and Mobile User Objective System.

UNITED STATES SPACE COMMAND

4-73. The Unified Command Plan establishes USSPACECOM as a geographical combatant command with
overall responsibility for military space operations within their assigned AOR. The USSPACECOM AOR
and the space domain are closely related, but not identical. The lower limit of the space domain remains
undefined while the USSPACECOM AOR starts at 100 km per the Unified Command Plan.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-15

Chapter 4

4-74. USSPACECOM is responsible for executing day-to-day, integrated space operations to deliver
theater and global effects in support of national and combatant commander objectives. They coordinate space
operational-level planning, integration, and coordination to ensure unity of effort in support of military and
national security operations and support to civil authorities. Commander, USSPACECOM executes tasking’s
for space operations through the Combined Space Operations Center. Army space teams and elements
coordinate on a daily basis with Combined Space Operations Center.
4-75. Army space forces are normally provided to Commander, USSPACECOM when not organic to a
unit. The joint force commander may submit a request for forces requesting Army space operations expertise.
Upon validation of the request for forces, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff deployment execution
order will be sent to unified combatant command, who will task the Army Service component command to
provide the forces. If tasked, the Army Service component command will provide Army space operations
expertise, capabilities, effects, and coordination support.
4-76. The commander has operational authority for all DOD SATCOM on-orbit assets, control systems,
and SATCOM terminal infrastructure. Commander, USSPACECOM, as the supported commander for
SATCOM, performs functions and activities of the SATCOM operational manager, including oversight,
management, and control of SATCOM resources.
4-77. Due to the nature of space assets, changes to satellite tasking to support one theater can affect other
theaters. Therefore, day-to-day command and control and satellite control is accomplished from a strategic
perspective rather than a theater perspective. The commander is responsible for conducting joint space
operations, and coordinating and conducting space planning through the joint planning process in support of
the national military strategy. They assigns appropriate command relationships for space operations to the
component commanders; components maintain this strategic perspective in their space planning and
operations. Together with the SCA, Army space operations officers ensure space operations are coordinated,
deconflicted, integrated, and synchronized at the theater level.

SPACE COORDINATING AUTHORITY

4-78. In space operations, space coordinating authority is the responsibility to plan, integrate, and
coordinate space operations (JP 3-14)—it is the single most important authority an Army space operations
officer must understand. The SCA is responsible for coordinating joint space operations and integrating
theater and global space capabilities and effects in an operational area. SCA within a joint force helps
coordinate joint space operations and integrates space capabilities and effects that support the combatant
commanders. The SCA coordinates space-related support with established objectives and acts on behalf of
the combatant commander, with primary responsibility for joint space operation planning. SCA is not a
position, but rather an authority imparted upon a commander or individual to coordinate space efforts within
the area of responsibility. The SCA within a joint force helps coordinate joint space operations and integrates
space capabilities and effects that support the combatant commander.
4-79. The joint force commander may retain SCA, but normally delegates SCA to the component command
with the preponderance of space forces. It is important to limit the possibility of interference or redundancy
between various space operations, and to deconflict responsibilities. The joint force commander considers
the mission, OE, duration of the operation, preponderance of space forces, capabilities made available, and
resident command and control capabilities (including reachback) in selecting the appropriate option.
4-80. If SCA is delegated, the director of space forces is normally tasked to execute the daily actions
associated with SCA. The SSE assigned to the joint force land component commander advocates for land
component space forces and space capabilities. It may be necessary for the SSE to assign a space operations
officer to augment the organization with SCA.
4-81. If SCA is delegated to the corps commander, the SSE within the corps supports the joint force land
component commander with planning and operations in the role as the SCA and performs the day-to-day
staff functions required to execute SCA. When the requirements of serving as the SCA exceed the capabilities
of the corps, the corps SSE requests augmentation from an ARSST.

4-16 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Army Space Operations

4-82. The SCA gathers operational requirements which may be satisfied by space capabilities and
facilitates the use of established processes by joint force staffs to plan and conduct space operations. The
SCA’s roles and responsibilities include:
 Coordinating space capabilities in the operational area to support joint functions;
 Planning, coordinating, integrating, and synchronizing space operations in the operational area
and ensures inputs from the joint force commander’s organizations are incorporated;
 Leading coordination for space nominated target development, vetting, and validation to the joint
force commander’s target nomination list;
 Submitting requests for space forces (such as deployed space forces), requests for space
capabilities (such as support to personnel recovery operations), and requests for implementation
of specific command relationship; and
 Providing consolidated space requirements through the joint force commander to
USSPACECOM.
4-83. The director of space forces is an Air Force construct. Each combatant command normally has a
designated director of space forces with a staff. When the Commander, Air Force forces is designated as the
SCA, the director of space forces deputy commander is typically an Army space operations officer. When an
Army space operations officer is serving in this capacity, the individual is normally responsible for:
 Overseeing day-to-day functions of the staff and accomplish SCA duties;
 Integrating space capabilities, space control operations, and planning into joint operations;
 Providing advice on space capabilities and employment;
 Providing the key staff counsel and training in space operations;
 Assisting with planning and executing theater space operations and applying space capabilities
throughout the joint targeting cycle;
 Assisting in coordinating tailored space capabilities throughout the area of responsibility;
 Representing specific land component space operations-related needs and issues;
 Acting as an intermediary between director of space forces staff and all Army space elements;
 Providing reachback support for forward deployed space forces from all Services in area of
responsibility; and
 Interacting with multinational space operations personnel within the Combined Space Operations
Center.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 4-17

This page intentionally left blank.
 Chapter 5
Planning, Preparing, Executing, and Assessing
The operations process describes the activities performed by any military unit to
accomplish a mission. This chapter discusses how space operations are incorporated into
the operations process. It provides the processes and outputs of the seven MDMP steps
with corresponding Army space specific examples. Space planners and space operations
play a substantive role in targeting activities, which are one of the several integrating
processes to synchronize specific functions throughout the operations process. Finally, the
space planner’s role in preparing, executing and assessing space operations is provided.

Note: There are no space planner positions identified on Army, corps, or division staffs. The
SSE or assigned space operations officers have responsibility for integrating space operations
into mission planning. Reference to a space planner refers to the organic SSE or space
operations officer conducting staff planning responsibilities.

ARMY DESIGN METHODOLOGY

5-1. The two primary methods planners use for collaboration on space operations are the Army design
methodology and the MDMP. The Army’s design methodology and the MDMP do not address the full scope
of space operation planning. Both may determine times and locations space operations are integrated to
support the concept of operations.
5-2. The Army design methodology is a method for applying critical and creative thinking to understand,
visualize, and describe unfamiliar problems and approaches to solving them. The Army design methodology
is used to assist commanders and staffs with planning. Given the unique and complex nature of space
operations, commanders and staffs benefit from implementing the Army design methodology to guide more
detailed planning during the MDMP. This entails framing an OE, framing a problem, and developing an
operational approach to solve the problem. See ADP 5-0 for additional information on the operations process.
5-3. Framing an OE involves critical and creative thinking by a group to build a model that represent both
the current state of the OE and the desired end state the OE should resemble at the conclusion of an operation.
A planning team designated by the commander will define, analyze, and synthesize characteristics of the
operational and mission variables to develop desired future end states. During the framing process, the staff
considers opportunities and support provided by space operations.
5-4. Framing a problem involves understanding and isolating the root causes of conflict discussed. Actors
may represent obstacles for commanders as they seek to achieve desired end states. Creating and employing
space capabilities shapes conditions in the OE supporting the commander’s objectives.
5-5. Collaboration is much more than coordination. Collaboration occurs between multiple people or
organizations working together towards a common goal by sharing knowledge and actively building
consensus. Throughout the operations process, the space planner must actively and continuously collaborate
with commanders, subordinate commanders, staffs, and unified action partners to ensure space capabilities
and effects are being efficiently integrated into all aspects of operations.

PLANNING FOR SPACE OPERATIONS

5-6. Planning is the art and science of understanding a situation, envisioning a desired future, and laying
out effective ways of bringing that future about (ADP 5-0). Planning is one of the four major activities of
command and control that occurs during the operations process (plan, prepare, execute, and assess).

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 5-1

Chapter 5

Commanders apply the art of command and the science of control to ensure space operations support the
concept of operations.
5-7. The space planner is the subject matter expert on capabilities and creating effects from the space
domain. The space planner ensures all COA meets the requirements for suitability, feasibility, and
acceptability regarding the integration of space capabilities and effects. The space planner should understand
the level of knowledge partner nations’ Soldiers have regarding the use space products and services.
5-8. Involving space planners early in development of the commander’s vision and planning allows for
collaboration and integration with missions, functions, and tasks. A consideration of space operations is the
lead-time required for capabilities and effects. Space planners should be involved early in the OPORD
preparation and effects approval process to enhance the integration of space capabilities and effects.
5-9. The space planners develop Appendix 18–Space Operations to Annex C of the base order. They use
Appendix 18 to describe in detail how space operations will support the concept of operations outlined in the
base order.
5-10. Space planners utilize a variety of working groups when conducting planning for operations,
including the cyberspace electromagnetic activity. The cyberspace electromagnetic activity working group
is accountable for integrating space operations, cyberspace, and electronic warfare operations and related
actions into the concept of operations. The cyberspace electromagnetic activity working group is a critical
component of space operation planning and integrates within the staff’s battle rhythm. Conducting space
planning separately from cyberspace and electronic warfare operations may diminish efficient employment
of all three. If uncoordinated, these activities may result in conflicts, mutual interference internally, inability
to communicate, loss of intelligence, the degradation of systems capabilities, and other EMS-related
anomalies. The cyberspace electromagnetic activity working group will primarily deconflict detection and
delivery assets through the planning and targeting processes.
5-11. Space planners participate in all aspects of COA development, analysis, and comparisons. The
principle focus a space planner has in the COA process is:
 Determine how space operations can best support commanders intent;
 Determine how space operations can be integrated into mission operations; and
 Provide input on which COA is most supportable and effective.

SPACE PLANNING IN THE MILITARY DECISIONMAKING PROCESS

5-12. MDMP is an iterative planning methodology to understand the situation and mission, develop a COA,
and produce an OPLAN or OPORD (ADP 5-0). Space planners and staff are responsible for integrating space
operations throughout the MDMP. Members of the SSE are responsible for planning by recommending
specific tasks, actions, and methods to integrate space operations into the plan.
5-13. The MDMP consists of seven steps:
 Step 1: Receipt of mission.
 Step 2: Mission analysis.
 Step 3: COA development.
 Step 4: COA analysis (war game).
 Step 5: COA comparison.
 Step 6: COA approval.
 Step 7: Orders production, dissemination, and transition.

Receipt of Mission
5-14. Commanders initiate the MDMP upon receipt or in anticipation of a mission. Space planners and
staff members responsible for planning and integrating space operations initiate coordination with higher
headquarters staff counterparts to obtain information on current and future space operations, running
estimates, and other space planning products.

5-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Planning, Preparing, Executing, and Assessing

5-15. The space planners proceed with analysis and assessment of the relevant aspects of the space OE
within the area of operations, emphasizing the space environment and friendly, neutral, and enemy space
capabilities. Based on the commander’s guidance, planning includes formulating one or more supportable
space operations COAs to accomplish the mission. Space-specific planning considerations for the receipt of
mission steps are in table 5-1 (below and page 5-4).
Table 5-1. Receipt of mission
Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
1. Supported/supporting space Synchronize space operations with the staff and workgroups:
staffs and liaisons alerted, • Cyber electromagnetic activities workgroup.
organized, and synchronized. • Special technical operations workgroup.
Coordinate with applicable higher • Operational protection workgroup.
and adjacent staff elements. • Future operations workgroup.
• Plans workgroup.
Contact, organize and synchronize • Fires and effects coordination workgroup.
with supported/supporting space • Information operations workgroup.
staffs and liaisons.
• Intelligence synchronization board.
Determine outside space related • Collection management workgroup.
agencies to contact and incorporate • Missile warning and air defense artillery workgroup.
into the planning process. • Missile defense workgroup.
• Knowledge management workgroup.
• Personnel recovery workgroup.
Coordinate space operational requirements with:
• United States Space Command and the Combined Space
Operations Center.
• Global Positioning System operations center.
• Commander delegated space control authority staff.
• Higher, adjacent, and lower echelon space support elements.
• Army components and adjacent Service components with
space operations expertise.
• Army space support teams.
Integrate unique capabilities of space control; positioning,
navigation, and timing; satellite communications; missile warning;
and environmental monitoring capabilities into staff planning.
2. Tools gathered and prepared for Review base operation order and all annexes.
mission analysis.
Review the space operations Appendix from past operations.
Tools include, but not limited to
Develop space support requests.
the higher headquarters order or
plan and operational graphics; Review space, electronic warfare, cyberspace, and integrated joint
maps and terrain products of the special technical operations standard operating procedures.
area of operations; standard
operating procedures; appropriate Determine if the command has the tools and processes to employ
provided terrain visualization using space-based imagery and data,
field manuals; current running
such as positioning, navigation, and timing signal blockage
estimates; any design products;
visualization or aircraft fly-through.
and other materials and products
required.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 5-3

Chapter 5

Table 5-1. Receipt of mission (continued)

Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
3. Updated space running estimate Provide the space running estimate with other staff sections for
and space-related limitations to the incorporation into the mission analysis effort.
mission.
Impacts of space operations on subordinate elements who do not
Determine pertinent facts,
have embedded space operation planners.
assumptions, friendly force status,
enemy activities and capabilities,
and civil considerations.
4. Conduct Initial assessment. Examine how space operations support the type of operation
(offensive, defensive, stability, support).
Understand the staff planning
time-line that outlines how long Determine general location of the operation and how it is enabled
the staff should spend on each and or constrained by space operations.
military decisionmaking process
Determine initial timeline of operation and its impacts to space
step.
operations.
Recognize which outside agencies
Provide space operations input to formulate commander’s initial
and organizations to contact and
guidance and initial warning order.
incorporate into the space planning
process.
Evaluate the staff’s space
understanding and experience
regarding the operation.

Mission Analysis
5-16. Commanders and staffs perform mission analysis to better understand the situation and problem,
identify what the command must accomplish, when and where it must be done, and why. Space planners and
staff members responsible for planning and integrating space capabilities gather, analyze, and synthesize
information on current conditions of the OE with an emphasis on the space domain.
5-17. In addition to the four major activities of the operations process, commanders and staffs use several
integrating processes to synchronize specific functions throughout the operations process. The integrating
processes—IPB, targeting, and risk management—provide an avenue to obtain the space-related threats and
hazards to be reviewed and refined. Threat and hazard assessments are continuously reviewed and updated
as the OE changes.
5-18. The space planners conduct threat and hazard analysis of space-based resources at Army, corps, and
division echelons. This analysis comprises a thorough, in-depth compilation and examination of information
and intelligence that address potential threats and hazards in the area of operations.
5-19. The space planner begins mission analysis with the systematic process of analyzing the mission
variables in an area of interest to determine the effect on operations. Space planners coordinate with the
intelligence staff to identify enemy and adversary capabilities and their use of the space domain to assist in
the development of models, situation templates, event templates, high-value targets, named areas of interest,
and other intelligence products. Space specific mission analysis planning considerations are in table 5-2
(pages 5-5 and 5-6).

5-4 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Planning, Preparing, Executing, and Assessing

Table 5-2. Mission analysis

Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
1. Conduct space operations Understanding higher headquarters space operations and
analysis of the base operation order capabilities.
and Annexes.
Understand space operations of adjacent, supporting, and supported
units and their relationship to the higher headquarters’ plan.
Understand joint, interagency, multinational, and non-government
organizations space operations in the operational areas.
2. Develop the initial space Identify key aspects of the space operational environment and make
assessment. assumptions about how friendly and threat forces will interact in the
space operational environment.
Identify critical gaps in commander’s knowledge of the space
operational environment.
Describe how the space operational environment effects potential
friendly courses of action.
3. Determine specified, implied, Determines essential space tasks for inclusion in the recommended
and essential space tasks mission statement. Identify any ‘be-prepared-to’ or ‘on-order’
space operations missions.
Implied task are for all friendly force elements to operate in an
autonomous manner during all phases of operations.
4. Review available space assets. Determine if the organization has the assets needed to accomplish
all space operations tasks. If planners identify shortages, request
additional resources needed for mission success to the higher
headquarters.
Identify any deviations from the normal space operations task
organization.
5. Determine constraints to space Identify and understand constraints the commander has placed on
operations. space operations. Considerations include use of frequencies and
bandwidth, space control capabilities, and sharing space
capabilities with partners and allies.
6. Identify critical facts and Determine facts concerning space operational and mission
develop assumptions concerning variables that can serve as the basis for developing situational
space operations. understanding for continued planning.
Determine assumptions necessary to complete an estimate of the
space operations situation and make a course of action decision.
7. Begin risk management of space Identify threats and hazards to space operations to determine risk.
operations.
Develop and document risk mitigation actions.
8. Develop initial space operations Identify and nominate space-related commander’s critical
requirements. information requirements and friendly force information
requirements to the commander and staff.
9. Assist the G-2 with developing Identify space requirements and any gaps.
the initial space reconnaissance
Evaluate available space assets to collect information and
and surveillance synchronization
determine gaps in the use of those space assets.
tools.
Submit requests for information for adjacent and higher collection
support.
10. Assist the G-2 to develop an Develop space reconnaissance and surveillance scheme of support,
initial space reconnaissance and tasking matrix, and overlays.
surveillance plan.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 5-5

Chapter 5

Table 5-2. Mission analysis (continued)

Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
11. Update plan Determine commander’s requirements for space briefing.
Determine times of collaborative planning sessions and the means
by which they will take place.
12. Develop initial themes and Identify and engage those actors who may have a part within space
messages of space operations. operations.
Develop a space operations theme that conveys a unifying or
dominant idea or image.
13. Develop proposed problem Compare the current space operational environment to the desired
statement concerning space end state.
operations.
List primary issues or obstacles within the space operational
environment that may impede the command from achieving the
desired end state.
14. Develop proposed space Determine the unit’s essential space operations tasks and who has
operations mission statement. responsibility to execute those tasks.
Determine when space operation will start (by time or event),
duration of the operation, and where the space effect is needed
(area of operations, objective, grid coordinates).
15. Present the space portion of the Provide the staff with space operations inputs to helps the
mission analysis briefing. commander understand, visualize, and describe the operations.
16. Develop and integrate initial Describes what constitutes success for the operation in terms of
commander’s intent in terms of space and the conditions defining the end state.
space operations.
17. Develop and issue initial space Describe when, where, and how the commander intends to employ
operation planning guidance. space to accomplish the mission.
18. Develop space course of action Develop criteria to address factors affecting success and failure of
evaluation criteria. space operations.
19. Assist the staff in issuing a Ensure subordinate and supporting space assets receive the
warning order. warning order.

Course of Action Development

5-20. COA development generates options for subsequent analysis and comparison satisfying the
commander’s intent and planning guidance. Space planners responsible for planning and integrating space
operations apply knowledge gained from the mission analysis step to help with overall COA development.
During COA development, space planners identify space capabilities likely to support an initial scheme of
operations. The scheme of operations for space describes how the commander intends to use space operations
to support the concept of operations with an emphasis on the scheme of maneuver.
5-21. The space planners begin COA development by estimating the relative combat power of friendly and
enemy space capabilities, including commercially contracted assets, if applicable. Space planners should
integrate their assessment of force ratio into the overall estimate. As the staff develops COA options, the
space planners explore friendly space-related activities required to support the operation.
5-22. Upon completion of COA development, space planners update mission analysis outputs, such as the
space operations-related input for the commander’s critical information requirements and essential elements
of friendly information. In addition, the staff updates their portions of the OPORD, including Appendix 18–
Space Operations to Annex C of the base order. Space specific COA development considerations are in table
5-3.

5-6 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Planning, Preparing, Executing, and Assessing

Table 5-3. Course of action development

Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
1. Assist the staff with assessing Analyze force ratios to determine and compare each force’s
relative combat power. strengths and weaknesses as a function of space operations.
2. Assist the staff to generate Determine the doctrinal requirements for each type of space
options. operation being considered, including doctrinal tasks for
subordinate units.
3. Assist the staff to array forces. Determine the relative space superiority required to accomplish
each task using historical planning ratios as a starting point.
Determine relative space superiority with regard to civilian
requirements and conditions that require attention.
Determine forces and capabilities for stability tasks.
4. Assist the staff to develop a Describe how space forces will help accomplish the mission
broad concept. within the commander’s intent. Summarize the contributions that
space forces will make in order to accomplish the mission.
5. Assist the staff in assigning Assist the staff planners to create a task organization by assigning
headquarters. headquarters to groupings of forces. Consider the types of space
assets assigned to a headquarters and the ability of that
headquarters to control those units.
6. Assist the staff in preparing Assist the staff in portraying how the unit will accomplish its
course of action statements and missions using the space domain. Assist the staff with developing
sketches. a sketch of the space aspects supporting the concept, including the
positioning of forces. Together, the statement and sketch cover
who (generic task organization), what (tasks), when, where, and
why for each subordinate unit.
7. Assist the staff with conducting Ensure the staff is provided space operations input for each course
course of action briefing. of action, to include:
• Enemy courses of action in the space domain
• Space operations considerations that might affect enemy
courses of action.
• Critical space operations events for each course of action.
• Why space assets are arrayed as shown on the course of action
sketch.
• Why the staff used the selected control measures.
• The impact of space operations on civilians.
• Updated space operations facts and assumptions.
• Refined space operations course of action evaluation criteria.
8. Select or modify course of Commander selects or modifies those courses of action for
action for continued analysis. continued analysis and issues planning guidance.

Course of Action Analysis

5-23. COA analysis enables commanders and staffs to identify difficulties, coordination problems, and
probable consequences of planned actions for each COA under consideration. Staff members responsible for
planning and integrating space operations use the draft products from COA development to participate in
COA analysis. During COA analysis, they refine their scheme of space operations, ensuring that it nests with
the scheme of maneuver. Space specific COA analysis considerations are in table 5-4 (page 5-8).
5-24. Upon completion of COA analysis, operational planning continues with drafting and submitting the
space support request and then updating these requests when the COA is later refined. Development and
submission of the space support request is the primary method by which Army forces request, coordinate,
and integrate effects to support space operations.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 5-7

Chapter 5

Table 5-4. Course of action analysis

Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
1. Assist the staff to gather tools. Gather the tools, materials, and data for the wargame. Assist the
staff with maps, computer simulations, and other tools that
accurately reflect the space operations environment. These
materials may include:
• Space running estimate.
• Space operations event templates.
• Completed space operations courses of action, including
graphics.
2. List all friendly space forces. Consider all space elements which may be committed to the
operation, paying special attention to support relationships and
constraints. This list remains constant for all courses of action.
3. List assumptions concerning Review previous space operations assumptions for continued
space operations. validity and necessity. During the course of mission analysis and
course of action development, space planners may have obtained
updated or additional information that confirms or denies initial
assumptions.
4. List known space operations List points when the commander or staff anticipates making key
critical events and decision points. decisions concerning a specific space operations course of action.
5. Assist the staff in conducting the Assess the results of the war game in terms of space operations.
wargame. Assist the staff in foreseeing actions, reactions, and counteractions
of all participants operating in the space domain.

Course of Action Comparison

5-25. COA comparison is an objective process to evaluate each COA independently and against set
evaluation criteria approved by the commander and staff. Space planners and staff members responsible for
space operations may not have direct involvement in this process, but will provide recommendations for
consideration. Upon completion of the COA comparison, output products, and the base OPORD, become the
final draft.
5-26. Space planners analyze and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each COA from the space
operations perspective, considering all space capabilities. Depending on the degree of space capabilities
affecting the mission, space planners may use their own matrix to compare COAs, or may integrate space
operations input along the elements of combat power or other decision matrix system the staff uses. Space
specific COA comparison considerations are in table 5-5.
Table 5-5. Course of action comparison
Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
1. Conduct advantages and Analyze the courses of action and determine the advantages and
disadvantages analysis. disadvantages to space operations in terms of:
• Minimizing risk to the force and mission accomplishment.
• Placing the force in the best posture for future operations.
• Providing maximum latitude for initiative by subordinate
space elements.
• Providing the most flexibility to meet unexpected threats and
opportunities.
2. Compare course of action. Analyze and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each
course of action from a space operations perspective. Present
findings for consideration by the other staff members.

Course of Action Approval

5-27. During COA approval the commander selects the COA that best accomplishes the mission legally,
ethically, effectively, efficiently, and in the right way. Considerations of proportionality, military necessity,

5-8 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Planning, Preparing, Executing, and Assessing

humanity, and discrimination must be applied equally. The commander will issue final planning guidance
including refined commander’s intent, commander’s critical information requirements, and any additional
guidance on priorities for the warfighting functions.
5-28. If the commander modifies a proposed COA or gives the staff an entirely different one, the space
operation planner must incorporate those modifications and ensure all staff members understand the changes
prior to war-gaming. Space specific COA approval considerations are in table 5-6.
Table 5-6. Course of action approval
Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
Incorporate course of action and Develop new commander’s critical information requirements for
any modifications space operations to support execution.
Determine space provided priorities.
React to additional guidance provided by the commander

Orders Production, Dissemination, and Transition

5-29. The final step of the MDMP is orders production, dissemination, and transition. The staff will finalize
all planning products, including the space operations running estimate. As time permits, the staff may conduct
a more detailed war game of the selected COA. The commander will approve the COA after all outputs are
internally reconciled.
5-30. Space planners should conduct confirmation briefings with subordinate space elements immediately
after orders production. Space specific dissemination considerations are in table 5-7.
Table 5-7. Orders production, dissemination, and transition
Processes and Outputs Space Considerations and Inputs
Produce and disseminate approved Disseminate the order to subordinate space support elements,
order to subordinate space Army space support teams, and other supporting space
elements. organizations and elements.
Conduct confirmation briefing with subordinate and supporting
Appendix 18–Space Operations to
space elements.
Annex C

TARGETING ACTIVITIES
5-31. Space planners and space operations play a substantive role in targeting activities. Targeting begins
in planning, and it is an iterative process that continues through preparation and execution. The functions of
decide, detect, deliver, and assess define the targeting process and occur simultaneously and sequentially
during the operations process. Targeting activities for space operations involving the employment of space
capabilities and effects closely follow standard targeting processes.
5-32. Targets identified through the operations process appear on the integrated target list. Organic space
capabilities, with the proper authority, may be tasked to create the desired effect on the target. Time,
synchronization, legal, and operational authorities’ issues may affect the decision to use organic assets. The
ability to affect targets may require proximity of capabilities and operational reach access.
5-33. If the unit’s organic abilities or authorities do not fulfill the targeting requirements to support the
commander’s intent, they request support from the next higher echelon. As requests pass from echelon to
echelon, each unit processes the target packet or request to use organic capabilities and authorities to support
the subordinate unit’s requirement. The requirement elevates until it reaches an echelon which can support
the requirement with the appropriate capabilities and authorities, or the echelon denies the targeting request.
Fulfilling space support requests on targets may not be possible due to prioritization, timing, capabilities,
authorization, or conflict with other requirements.
5-34. Identifying targets early in the planning process is key to approval, integration, and synchronization.
Integrating the targets into the normal targeting process identifies if the capabilities can achieve the desired

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 5-9

Chapter 5

effects. Due to their impact, some space capabilities and effects require synchronization and coordination
across the entire staff. Some effects may prohibit friendly use of the space domain—knowingly or
inadvertently—and the situational awareness of the space operation will enable the staff in taking the
appropriate remediation actions and decisions.
5-35. Targets not available for space effects through Army means may continue to joint echelons for
processing. The targets may require additional joint force space assets or authorities to support the Army
commander’s mission. This could result in the corps and below targets being included on the joint integrated
prioritized target list.
5-36. Targets described as systems with components and subcomponents that enable the determination of
aimpoints for designated friendly force capabilities. An aimpoint is a point associated with a target and
assigned for a specific weapon impact (JP 3-60). Developing targets suitable for space effects requires a
concerted staff effort. Ultimately, commanders, with the assistance of their staffs decide to employ space
capabilities alone or with other capabilities.

Decide
5-37. Decide is the first step in the targeting process. It begins with the MDMP. It does not end when the
plan is completed; the decide function continues throughout the operation. Using the outputs from the
planning process, commanders and staffs determine where and when space effects will support the concept
of operations.
5-38. Due to the nature of space operations, commanders should allow as much planning time as possible
when requesting effects through the space domain. Army commanders are encouraged to consider space
effects during the targeting process.
5-39. An important part of this step in the targeting process is identifying potential adverse impacts and
mitigating them. This requires coordination and synchronization on the part of the staff executing space
operations. Any action in space domain, cyberspace, and the EME, either offensive or defensive, must be
coordinated and balanced with potential degradation inflicted on friendly systems.
5-40. During the decide step, the staff develops information regarding the space domain and targets by
asking:
 What targets can be affected?
 What targets should be affected?
 When and where are the targets likely to be identified, accessed, or otherwise engaged to create
desired effects?
 How long will the targets remain accessible?
 What are the related information collection requirements essential to the targeting effort; and how
and when must the information be collected, processed, and disseminated?
 When, where, how, why, and in what priority should the targets be affected?
 What are the measure of performance and measure of effectiveness?
 What or who will obtain assessment or other information required for determining the success or
failure of each engagement of target nodes?
 Who must receive and process that information, how rapidly, and in what format?

Detect
5-41. Detect is the next critical function in targeting. The information collection plan is a critical component
of the detect function. The staff must consider space operations requirements throughout the intelligence
process. The G-2 serves a key role in developing and managing the information collection plan specific to
space operations.
5-42. The detailed analysis of enemy and friendly space systems provides information on enemy and
adversary actions. During the detect step units gather the information needed to gain access, pair a capability,
and develop the necessary intelligence to vet and validate nominated targets. After analysis, it may be
possible to determine enemy intentions, when combined with other information. Planners attain situational

5-10 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Planning, Preparing, Executing, and Assessing

understanding of space systems through data, such as orbit, geospatial location, signal strength, system type,
and frequency of target to focus effects on the intended target.
5-43. The detect function includes tasks in and through specific portions of space domain and cyberspace
or the EME to locate, track, and validate targets or follow on action by friendly forces. Planners implement
target development, vetting, and validation in parallel with the information collection plan.

Deliver
5-44. Space planners in coordination with the cyberspace electromagnetic activity section, through the
targeting process ensure the full synchronization, integration, deconfliction, and employment of space
operations, cyberspace, and electronic warfare effects according to the commander’s scheme of maneuver.
Close coordination between collection assets and delivery assets is critical during the engagement to avoid
unintended effects and enable the assessment phase.
5-45. The detect function initiates the guidance and the target is attacked as planned. Close coordination is
required between those engaged in detecting targets and those engaged in delivering effects upon targets.
Integration and synchronization is vitally important during the deliver step.

Assess
5-46. Assessment occurs throughout the operations process. Targeting of space systems is continually
refined and adjusted between the commander and staff during the operation. Assessment provides
information on the effectiveness of decide and detect functions and whether the targets need reengaging.

PREPARING FOR SPACE OPERATIONS

5-47. Preparation consists of those activities performed by units and Soldiers to improve their ability to
execute an operation (ADP 5-0). Preparation creates conditions that improve friendly forces’ opportunities
for success. It requires commander, staff, unit, and Soldier actions to ensure the force is trained, equipped,
and ready to execute operations. Preparation activities help commanders, staffs, and Soldiers understand a
situation and their roles in upcoming operations.
5-48. Mission success depends as much on preparation as on planning. Higher headquarters may develop
the best of plans; however, plans serve little purpose if subordinates do not receive them in time. Subordinates
need enough time to understand plans well enough to execute them. Subordinates develop their own plans
and preparations for an operation. After they fully comprehend the plan, subordinate leaders rehearse key
portions of it and ensure Soldiers and equipment are positioned and ready to execute the operation. Space
operations officers routinely work with other members of the coordinating and special staffs such as the
intelligence cell, signal operations, network operations, movement and maneuver cell, air and missile defense
section, fires cell, and staff weather office element.
5-49. Peacetime preparation by units involves building contingency planning databases about the
anticipated area of operations. These databases can be used for space operations input to the space running
estimate and to plan initial space operations.
5-50. An important element of preparation is developing and implementing the ability to coordinate among
relevant units and agencies. The SSE initiates the coordinating activities with other staff sections. Much of
this coordination occurs during meetings and workgroups, but SSE members are monitoring other activities
which might relate to space operations.
5-51. External coordination—subordinate units, higher headquarters, and other agencies—concerns space
assets, resources, or forces which are not under unit control during planning. External coordination also
includes coordinating with adjacent units and agencies. In space operations, adjacent refers to any
organization affecting a unit’s operations. Liaising is an important coordination means. Effective liaising is
through command liaison officers, and a member of the SSE may be part of a liaison team. Establishing
liaison early in planning supports effective coordination. Practical liaising can be achieved through personal
contacts between space organizations.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 5-11

Chapter 5

5-52. Protection consists of a broad set of unit specific, coordinated actions conducted to protect the force.
The SSE develops and initiates protection actions during planning, but executes them mainly during
preparation and execution. Threat assessment begins during planning and continues throughout preparation.
Protection measures may explicitly include space operations elements.
5-53. Resupplying, maintaining, and issuing special supplies or equipment to space operations unit’s takes
place during preparation. Repositioning logistic assets for units assigned space operations tasks also occurs
during preparation. The SSE coordinates with the assistant chief of staff, logistics sustainment section to
ensure units assigned space operations tasks receive the necessary support.

EXECUTING SPACE OPERATIONS

5-54. Successful space operations execution relies on mutual trust and cohesive teamwork with rapid
information exchange among them. As operations unfold, space operations objectives and tasks are modified
to provide effective support.
5-55. Monitoring space operations execution focuses principally on maintaining the effectiveness of space
operations. The SSE uses the critical asset list and defended asset list to monitor the status of friendly space
operations activities and the status of terrestrial, aerial, and space systems.
5-56. During execution, the SSE assesses space operations execution and how to adjust space operations
as the operation unfolds. The need for responsive staff coordination among the SSEs, headquarters, and units
participating in space operations intensifies during execution as mission operations progress and vary from
the OPORD. The decentralized nature of space operations execution, combined with the multiple command
levels involved, entail a wide span of coordination for the SSE.
5-57. Decision making during execution includes executing space operations as planned, adjusting space
operations to a changing friendly situation, and adjusting space operations to react to unexpected enemy
actions. Space operations may not be executed exactly as planned for a variety of reasons. The SSE’s
challenge under adverse circumstances is to rapidly assess how changes in space operations execution affect
the overall operation and to determine necessary follow-on actions.

ASSESSING SPACE OPERATIONS

5-58. Commanders and staffs continually assess operations by using measure of performance and measure
of effectiveness. A measure of performance is an indicator used to measure a friendly action that is tied to
measuring task accomplishment (JP 5-0). A measure of effectiveness is an indicator used to measure a current
system state, with change indicated by comparing multiple observations over time (JP 5-0). A measure of
effectiveness is an identifiable and measureable event or action, which tells the commander whether the
action taken had the desired effect.
5-59. Effects produced on and through space systems, are often not easy to assess. Rarely is damage
physically visible or readily apparent. Assessment occurs throughout the operations process. Although
assessment is a final step in the operations process, it also informs and guides other activities of the operations
process. Assessment involves deliberately comparing forecasted outcomes with actual events to determine
the overall effectiveness of force employment. Measure of performance and measure of effectiveness are key
activities during assessment.

5-12 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Planning, Preparing, Executing, and Assessing

5-60. SSEs continually assess operations. A measure of performance helps answer questions such as: “Was
the action taken?” or “Were the tasks completed to standard?” A measure of performance confirms or denies
a task has been properly performed.
 Examples of measure of performance include the following:
o Success or failure of FFT infrastructure to enable the COP;
o Have mitigation measures enable uninterrupted operations;
o Have precision munitions remained within acceptable limits.
o Have the missile warning alerts provided sufficient accuracy and time to take protective
measures; and
o Have friendly forces been able to maintain communications or GPS lock.
 Examples of measure of effectiveness may include the following:
o Has solar activity impacted GPS and precision navigation;
o Ability of electromagnetic interference resolution processes to resolve SATCOM or GPS
electromagnetic interference in a timely manner;
o Timeliness of receipt of commercial satellite imagery products; and
o Has the enemy’s decision cycle been disrupted due to loss or degraded communications.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 5-13

This page intentionally left blank.
 Chapter 6
Space Products
The three separate products a space operations officer prepares are the space-unique inputs
to the IPB, the space running estimate, and Appendix 18–Space Operations to Annex C of
the base order. The space running estimate is prepared as a tab to the Appendix 18 to the
OPLAN, while the SSE provides space input to the intelligence cell’s IPB activity. Both
the space running estimate and space input to IPB process are systematic, continuous
methods of analyzing and documenting factors affecting space capabilities that affect the
OE. These space products present the supported commander and staff with information
about the space situation that pertains to accomplishing the unit mission. These products
are designed to support other estimates and the MDMP. The purpose of the space running
estimate is to systematically consider the space dimension of the area of operation. This
chapter outlines the necessary content of space analysis as a tool to identify how space
capabilities influence the operations.

PURPOSE OF THE SPACE INPUT

6-1. The purpose of space input to the IPB process is to provide the intelligence cell and other staff
elements, with a highly detailed analysis of the space domain and its capabilities and effects within the OE.
IPB is an analytical methodology to reduce uncertainties about the enemy and the OE, and fuses the air and
space domain, terrain, and weather into a consolidated, coordinated assessment. IPB is the key to preparing
for the next engagement and, during peacetime, builds the foundational data that will be updated and
enhanced continuously and simultaneously during operations.
6-2. An enemy’s access to space domain or space control capabilities can generate effects with impact
across all levels of war. Space-related inputs to the IPB are conducted at the tactical level to support combat
operations. It needs to be a focused effort directly impacting the mission or operations that leverage the results
of the USSPACECOM space IPB program. This multi-agency intelligence production effort is designed to
augment a combatant command’s joint IPB tailored to assessing enemy usage of the space domain with
predictive courses of action. The USSPACECOM IPB process is a continuous all-source intelligence
production effort tailored to support combatant commander contingency plans and OPLAN in existence.
6-3. The SSE should coordinate through the intelligence cell for access to existing USSPACECOM IPB
products during mission analysis. If the SSE’s area of responsibility doesn’t have an available space input to
the IPB product, or if further tailoring is necessary, the SSE should submit an intelligence requirement
through the collections manager to USSPACECOM. The SSE and intelligence cell should review the joint
space IPB to understand the enemy’s use of the space domain, space order of battle, and space control courses
of action to integrate into the unit IPB process. Based on the intelligence cell’s limited capacity to focus on
the space domain, the SSE should lead the space threat analysis effort, which will eventually be incorporated
into the overall intelligence estimate.
6-4. Based on mission variables, staffs down to brigade level need to determine how best to integrate space
capabilities and vulnerabilities into their mission analysis process. This effort supports all facets of MDMP
and is the key space situation analysis tool used during the operation. The use of space systems may
significantly affect operations involving communications, navigation, threat warning, weather monitoring,
reconnaissance, and surveillance. Throughout all phases of an operation (from pre-deployment to mission
completion), the space domain impact on military operations is a key factor for which the commander must
plan. The SSE, in coordination with the rest of the staff, conducts the space running estimate process and
space input to IPB, and makes the products available to the staff and the commander.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 6-1

Chapter 6

SPACE INPUT TO THE INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION OF THE

BATTLEFIELD PROCESS
6-5. The SSE provides all space unique IPB products for integration to the intelligence cell. These space
products are incorporated into the IPB products generated by the intelligence cell for use in the planning,
preparing, and executing of all operations. The SSE coordinates closely with the intelligence cell to reduce
the potential for redundant analysis.
6-6. The four steps of IPB (per ATP 2-01.3) adequately describe the process required for the SSE to provide
the space operations input to IPB. However, as part of the overall mission analysis effort, step 4 also supports
the space running estimate with linkage to the army warfighting functions. This is done because the SSE
must evaluate the overall capability of the threat to attack or degrade space operations, and this needs to be
reflected in graphic format as part of the space input to the IPB. The four IPB steps are:
 Define the OE;
 Describe environmental effects on operations;
 Evaluate the threat; and
 Determine threat courses of action.

STEP 1—DEFINE THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Identification of Space Area of Interest

6-7. Step 1 begins with identification of the supported unit area of operations. Once the area of operations
is identified, the area of interest is coordinated with the intelligence cell. Based on a clear understanding of
the operational commander’s area of operations, the intelligence cell specified area of interest, and the
supported unit mission, the SSE determines a separate and distinct space area of interest. The space portion
of the area of interest supports and complements the total intelligence cell and movement and maneuver cell
effort and is designed to depict the relevance of space to the maneuver commander’s engagement.
6-8. The space portion of the area of interest includes the region above and adjacent to the ground portion
of the area of operations as illustrated in figure 6-1. The SSE may further subdivide the space area of interest
in named area of interests that roughly correspond to low, medium, geosynchronous, and highly elliptical
orbits. It starts at ground level, continues through LEO, and terminates with the GEO and above. Satellites
moving through the identified space area of interest, space weather, and key terrestrial space-related locations
(and associated terrestrial weather) are all considered in the space input to IPB. Space-related activity
occurring anywhere outside of the designated space area of interest (such as space weather, space launches,
and ground station activity) needs to be considered in this effort only if it directly impacts the operational
mission. Identification of the space area of interest should help answer questions, such as:
 What is the status and capabilities of U.S. satellites to support the mission?
 Is the satellite orbit conducive to support operations within the area of operations?

Initial Examination
6-9. Once the space area of interest is identified, the SSE begins an initial examination, in conjunction with
the other staff elements, of available information and knowledge gaps that need to be addressed. During the
initial examination, the following issues may help determine the information and knowledge gaps and areas
where space assets may be requested:
 The operational status of friendly space systems, availability, and importance to mission
accomplishment.
 Initial assessment of commercial space, and how it may impact both enemy and friendly
operations;
 Impact of terrestrial and space weather on mission operations; and
 Initial assessment of enemy space capabilities;

6-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Products

Figure 6-1. Situation template with space area of interest

STEP 2—DESCRIBE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON OPERATIONS

6-10. Step 2 includes terrestrial and space weather and terrain analysis relevant to space capabilities. Care
is taken during this step to limit the focus to the weather and terrain impacts on space operations; otherwise
there is duplication with the intelligence cell effort. In fact, this step is conducted in close coordination with
the intelligence cell staff weather officer and terrain team to ensure a complementary effort.

Impact of Space Weather

6-11. The first task of step 2 is to examine the impact of space weather on mission operations. The space
environment consists of the full range of electromagnetic radiation and charged particles (electrons and
protons, which constitute solar wind) that continually flow from the sun at varying intensities. Several types
of solar activity cause energetic particle streams to intensify the normal (or background) levels of solar
wind. These changes in solar wind speed and density disturb the Earth’s magnetic field as they sweep by,
creating geomagnetic and ionospheric storms. The fundamental drivers of space weather activity include
solar flares (a rapid, intense variation in solar brightness, including a release of radiation across the EMS)
and coronal mass ejections (huge bubbles of plasma ejected from the sun which may reach Earth in as little
as 15 hours). These space weather disturbances may potentially degrade both commercial and military
capabilities for periods ranging from several minutes to a few hours. More extreme impacts such as loss of
system performance are less likely. The potential for space weather to disrupt friendly, civil, commercial,
and enemy space systems needs to be integrated early during step 2. Impacts may include space-to-space,
space-to-ground, and ground-to-ground communications, radar, and optical sensors across all portions of
the EMS. Table 6-1 (page 6-4) is a summary of a space running estimate product reflecting the space
weather effects in an area of operation, and may not be all inclusive.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 6-3

Chapter 6

Table 6-1. Space weather impact summary

Space Weather
Impacted systems Effects Available support
Hazards
Solar flare (X-rays) • High frequency • Shortwave fade • Shortwave fade
communications advisory
Solar radio bursts • Radars • Frequency interface • Solar radio burst
• Ultrahigh frequency • Target mask advisory
satellite communications
Ionospheric • Ultrahigh frequency • Signal fade • Scintillation forecast
scintillation satellite communications • Loss of signal lock • Post event
• Global Positioning System assessment
6-12. The specific phenomena that need to be included in the space weather analysis effort include:
 Electromagnetic radiation that may interfere with communications and radar systems during
daylight hours;
 Energetic charged particles that degrade the performance of high-latitude, ground-based
communications and radar systems and that disrupt or damage satellites; and
 Solar wind events causing ionospheric scintillation in the polar and equatorial areas impair or
disrupt SATCOM and GPS signals.

Impact of Terrestrial Weather

6-13. The second task of step 2 is determining the impact terrestrial weather will have on space operations.
The staff weather officer has access to the 557th Weather Wing and to the theater specific weather support
element databases of terrestrial weather information for the area of operations. The SSE tailors the staff
weather officer product to the space analysis effort. For example, the impact on space capabilities will be
considerably different during monsoon season in parts of the United States Indo-Pacific Command area of
responsibility when compared to the stable, high pressure weather conditions which are common over much
of the United States Central Command area of responsibility. The SSE develops a thorough understanding
of the mission and effectively analyzes the linkage between terrestrial weather and space capabilities. The
Staff Weather Officer tailors space weather information into a product that provides space weather effects on
Army operations for the Army Component’s area of responsibility for each COCOM.
6-14. Some factors related to weather analysis include, but are not limited to:
 Terrestrial weather, such as heavy precipitation, can interfere with SATCOM reception;
particularly when operating in frequencies above 10 gigahertz, which includes higher portions of
the super-high frequency band, as well as X-, Ku-, K-, Ka-, and extremely high frequency bands;
 Cloud cover impacting collection of electro-optical imagery and data;
o Interference with electro-optical, multispectral imagery, and infrared collection;
o The high moisture content in cloud cover may hinder the infrared detection capability of
missile warning sensors; and
 Degradation of space-based infrared sensors due to cloud cover. If there is a missile threat, the
SSE determines if cloud cover may inhibit detecting and reporting on threat missile launches.

Relation Between Terrain and Space Capabilities and Effects

6-15. The third task of the area of operation effects analysis effort focuses on the relation between terrain
and space capabilities and effects. It must be understood that while terrestrial impacts are typically addressed
in other sections of the IPB, the SSE must consider terrain impacts on the information chain. For example,
in restrictive terrain, line of sight issues may restrict access to space systems and result in degraded
operations. Analysis for space capabilities may be evaluated automatically or through observation and fields
of fire, avenues of approach, key terrain, obstacles, cover, and concealment. Some examples of how terrain
impacts space capabilities and effects are identified below.

6-4 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Products

 Mountainous terrain may impede the basic line of sight between a satellite and a ground terminal
or receiver (primarily SATCOM and GPS). Communication satellites in a geosynchronous orbit
with high inclinations may move the satellite in and out of the line of site of a receiver due to their
ground trace. Mountains and buildings may also affect GPS accuracy. GPS signals,
communications, and radar from a satellite may experience multi-pathing, which occurs when the
signal is reflected off a mountains or buildings on the way to a receiver. The timing of the GPS
signal is impaired which affects the accuracy of the receiver. Though this should only be a minor
problem for navigation, it has the potential for a greater impact on GPS guided munitions.
 Information collections systems may also be impacted by terrain as off-center imagery collection
may be blocked by mountains and tall buildings. If this happens, the satellite cannot take an image
to complete its mission until another revisit provides a better angle.
 Vegetation may also be a consideration when conducting the space related terrain analysis. Dense
jungles may require a higher reliance on ultrahigh frequency communications, GPS signal
reception may be impeded, and panchromatic imagery will only provide a black and white image
of the top of the forests with no penetration. However, multispectral imagery may be able to detect
changes in vegetation (destroying, modifying, and camouflage) that indicate enemy activity.

STEP 3–EVALUATE THE THREAT

6-16. Step 3 transitions from an orientation on the environment as a whole to a detailed focus on enemy
capabilities. The SSE coordinates with the intelligence cell staff for this information. The desired end effect
is knowledge of adversarial space forces, the doctrinal principles that indicate how these space forces are
employed, recommended space high-value targets, and an initial assessment of adversarial space courses of
action.
6-17. In step 3 of the IPB process, the SSE will coordinate with the intelligence cell for an examination of
key enemy space capabilities including use of civil and commercial space assets. The SSE needs to ensure
the intelligence cell understands the resulting intelligence products are important and will provide support to
the intelligence cell as requested. Important factors to include in step are below.
 Assist the intelligence cell in developing information requirements for intelligence support to
space operations.
 A detailed review of the adversarial space threat characteristics and the potential commercial
space threat characteristics available to support enemy operations. Knowledge of the space threat
characteristics is the necessary first step to understanding the threat. As part of this initial analysis,
the SSE needs to consider enemy counterspace capabilities.
 An identification of space capabilities that will probably be employed by the enemy in the specific
operation the SSE is analyzing. These enemy space capabilities include organic space systems,
third-party space capabilities, enemy access to space capabilities via consortia, and direct enemy
use of commercial space assets.
 An analysis of the following factors, regarding enemy force enhancement operations:
o Reconnaissance and surveillance. What are the near-space and space reconnaissance and
surveillance systems (organic, commercial, third-party) available to support military
operations? Does the enemy use space reconnaissance and surveillance for strategic or
tactical operations? What are enemy tasking, collection, processing, exploitation, and
dissemination capabilities for space reconnaissance and surveillance? Does the enemy have
the ability to receive and disseminate information in a timely manner to support the targeting
process?
o Missile warning. Most potential adversaries have no space-based missile warning capability.
However, the SSE should consider what threat ballistic and cruise missile assets are available,
and the capability of friendly space-based warning systems to collect and accurately identify
potential threat missile systems. The SSE does not need to analyze threat missile targeting
strategies (intelligence cell role) nor attempt to duplicate the air defense role in warning and
dissemination.
o Environmental monitoring. What space weather and remote sensing assets are available to
support the enemy? Determine the doctrinal employment of these systems.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 6-5

Chapter 6

o PNT. To what degree does the enemy rely on PNT? What are the key adversarial capabilities
that rely on PNT? How is it incorporated into critical operations? What are other PNT
alternate capabilities?
o SATCOM. What key military and commercial SATCOM systems does the enemy employ?
What is the reliance of the enemy on SATCOM to perform effective mission control?
 A review of the enemy’s space control capabilities, which includes:
o Jammers, ground-based electronic warfare, direct ascent weapons, or directed energy
capabilities that may be directed against friendly space assets;
o Friendly force space capabilities that may be targeted as part of the enemy space control
strategy to include satellites, data links, and ground control segments; and
o Analysis of potential enemy space-related vulnerabilities. Examples are enemy reliance on a
single ground station, a single satellite for weather support, poor resolution, or slow tasking,
collection, processing, exploitation, and dissemination process for space surveillance and
reconnaissance.
 A recommendation of space-related high-value targets. These high-value targets could be
vulnerabilities uncovered by analysis or those used to support a specific friendly force mission
objective. The SSE should assist the movement and maneuver cell in developing the targeting
strategy for nominating high-value targets as part of the targeting process to provide space
targeting focus to the Intelligence Cell staff. The high-value targets should be considered for
potential negation operations.
 An analysis of general space-related COAs based on enemy doctrine, situation template,
accessibility to space assets, and the enemy’s operational objectives. Examples include:
o What type of space capabilities will be most relied upon, such as information collection,
SATCOM, and or PNT; and
o How the enemy will attempt to attack friendly space assets and or protect their forces from
U.S. space operations.

STEP 4—DETERMINE THREAT COURSES OF ACTION

6-18. Step 4 of the IPB incorporates efforts from steps 1 through 3. The key tool and most important product
of step 4 is the space situation template—refer back to figure 6-1 on page 6-3. The space situation template
is a depiction of the space situation: the who, what, where, when, and why of the space operations in support
of the plan. It is an assessment and should be presented as such.
6-19. The situation template depicts how the staff believes space impacts the supported command
operations. The SSE coordinates with the intelligence cell or staff for this information. Because it includes a
detailed threat analysis, the space situation template is coordinated with the staff prior to being briefed or
disseminated to the commander and staff. This template is an excellent tool to depict graphically the enemy’s
most probable COA as it relates to the space aspects of the fight, to include the enemy’s perception of how
civil, commercial, and friendly satellites are employed. The space situation template can be an important
contribution to both the intelligence and the space running estimates. The space situation template is tailored
to reflect the impact that enemy, civil, and commercial space systems have on the operational mission. The
space situation template is the culminating piece of the space running estimate developed to support the
mission analysis phase of MDMP. The following component pieces can be included in development of the
space situation template. Each of these component pieces is briefed as the space capabilities analysis to help
the staff clearly understand the impact of space environment on the tactical operation. When building the
space situation template, consider the following:
 It is a snapshot in time (for example, 301200Z), and must be continually updated;
 It focuses on the space portion of the area of interest to show the direct relation of the space area
of interest to the terrestrial maneuver area of operations;
 It depicts the general disposition of friendly and enemy maneuver forces to show the relevance of
space capabilities to operations; and
 It reflects key enemy space capabilities; space related targets the enemy may attack, and other
actions the enemy may take related to space environment.

6-6 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Space Products

6-20. The space situation template depicts friendly satellite systems that may be targeted by the enemy
through uses such as SATCOM jamming or the use of camouflage, concealment and deception to deceive
friendly space assets. The intelligence cell is a key contributor to this process to ensure enemy intent and
space capabilities are accurately assessed in relation to the overall enemy operational objectives. The
assessment includes when and where the enemy may conduct counterspace operations to degrade friendly
satellites effectiveness, and whether the enemy understands the reliance the Army places on key space
capabilities like SATCOM to support extended range operations. The template reflects appropriate
symbology to depict this activity, such as a line from the enemy’s electronic warfare system to the targeted
SATCOM. The SSE will assist the intelligence cell with technical knowledge of enemy space systems and
capabilities as required.
6-21. The situation template enables staff to project the most probable enemy space COA for organic, third-
party, civil, and commercial space assets, such as:
 Attempts to deceive information collections during satellite over-flight through the use of
deceptive activity such as troop movement, muster, decoys, and mock ups;
 Threatened use of weapons of mass destruction;
 The probable targets for enemy collection, the means by which data is collected (geospatial
intelligence and signals intelligence), and the expected time delay for tasking, collecting,
processing, exploiting, and disseminating data to enemy units. An example might be to anticipate
the enemy will use electro-optical against a headquarters because it is a high-value target. The
enemy’s dissemination timelines support targeting fixed or semi-fixed facilities only;
 Attempt to jam SATCOM, or GPS to protect from precision guided munitions;
 Use commercial SATCOM for regime survival, propaganda, or command and control; and
 Critical enemy space and associated terrestrial nodes to recommend for friendly targeting of high
payoff targets. If the enemy has a single point of failure for receipt of satellite imagery, this could
be a high payoff target. A key part of the space running estimate effort during step 4 is the
identification of enemy space-related high payoff targets.
6-22. The desired end state is, on completion of step 4, the supported commander and staffs have a thorough
understanding of how space capabilities influence the pending mission, and the ability to be proactive. The
completed space input to IPB will:
 Set the stage for development of Appendix 18–Space Operations to Annex C of the base order;
 Contribute to the development of the intelligence cells’ Annex B–Intelligence, collection
priorities, and intelligence estimates;
 Provide valid high-value target recommendations;
 Contribute to information superiority over the enemy; and
 Influence COA development and mission execution.

6-23. The space input to the IPB remains valid throughout the operation and should be updated and included
in staff updates, as the situation dictates. Although it is an extensive undertaking, the intelligence cell, in
coordination with the SSE, will produce tailored and effective mission variable focused space input to the
IPB in a reasonable time.

SPACE RUNNING ESTIMATE

6-24. The space running estimate is a complementary product of the space input to the IPB and is provided
by the SSE. It is used to recommend the best use of available space capabilities and must be accomplished in
close coordination with the commander and staff elements as part of the overall planning process. The space
running estimate must be regularly updated to stay current with ongoing operations.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 6-7

Chapter 6

6-25. The space running estimate should not address space reconnaissance and surveillance capabilities.
The SSE should coordinate all intelligence requirements through the G-2. The format and content of the
space running estimate includes the following:
 Describe the area of operation environment or space area of interest. This can be derived from the
information compiled during steps one and two of space IPB;
 Assess enemy space capabilities may be derived from steps three and four of space aspects of IPB
and is conducted in close coordination with the intelligence cell;
 Evaluate friendly space force capabilities;
o Define essential, specified, and implied space tasks;
o Define space capabilities strengths and vulnerabilities;
o Identify operational status and relative importance of each space capability to operations
function;
o Identify space control capabilities status, relevance, and possible employment options;
o Compare current mission requirements versus existing space capabilities’ ability to support
the operation; and
o Identify additional space forces which may be necessary for the operation.
 The SSE, in coordination with the staff elements, conducts COA analysis;
o Describe how space capabilities can support each of the identified friendly force COAs in
terms such as suitability, feasibility, and completeness;
o Identify how space capabilities will affect each COA;
o Identify the space control strategy for each COA; and
o The SSE recommends which COA is most supportable from a space capabilities perspective.
The most supportable COA is the one where the space architecture is most capable and best
suited to support. It is not necessarily the COA with the most dependencies on space
capabilities.
 Identify space assumptions;
 Key members of the staff the SSE must coordinate with are:
o G-2 for space-related intelligence, threat; and information collection issues;
o G-3 for support to operations, commander’s intent, and FFT;
o G-6 for SATCOM and GPS;
o Air defense cell for missile warning; and
o Staff weather officer for terrestrial and space weather.

SATELLITE OPERATIONAL STATUS

6-26. The satellite operational status describes the status of satellites that support (or affect) the
commander’s area of operations. This includes analysis of key commercial satellites affecting operations to
the maximum extent possible. Commercial satellite operators are obligated to provide responsive satellite
capabilities to the Army or DOD users who pay for the services, and provide relevant status information
through the appropriate channels. Satellites may be partially operational or nonoperational for a variety of
reasons that include, but is not limited to:
 Satellite sensor malfunction;
 Satellite maintenance, maneuvering, or repositioning;
 Space environment; and
 Ground station control updating communications software or installing upgrades to satellite
systems.

6-8 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Appendix A
Annex C, Appendix 18 Template
The space operations officer is responsible to prepare Annex C, Appendix 18–Space
Operations to of the base order. This appendix provides a format for Appendix 18 in
Army plans and orders. The format for the annex can be modified to meet the
requirements of the base order and operations. This chapter also includes an example
information collection plan.
A-1. Appendix 18–Space Operations provides fundamental considerations, detailed information, and
instructions on space forces and capabilities to Annex C of the base OPLAN or order the supported
commander can use throughout the operation. Appendix 18 is used to coordinate early with the staff, to
include the G-2, G-6, air defense artillery officer, and the special technical operations cell to synchronize
efforts and avoid duplication of information.
A-2. Appendix 18 is the primary location for space operations, but space operations information may be
found in other annexes and appendices. Complete Appendix 18 as required for amplifying details. For
example, SATCOM requirements would normally be covered in Annex K by the J6 and Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance requirements would normally be covered in Annex B by the J2. While the
G-2 is responsible for producing a space threat portion in the intelligence estimate to Annex B, the SSE may
contribute to this product such as providing impacts of space weather on operations. The SSE is responsible
for preparing Appendix 18 to the OPLAN or OPORD. Commanders and staffs use Appendix 18 to describe
how space operations support the concept of operations described in the base plan or order.
A-3. Appendix 18 uses the standard five-paragraph OPORD format and contains the information indicated
in figure A-1 on pages A-2 thru A-5. All references in the content, such as Appendix 2–Operation Overlay
to Annex C–Operations refer to the base plan or order. Italicized text is recommendations or amplifying
information.

Note: CJCSM 3130.03A is the source document for Appendix 18 material—it takes precedence
over this template if any discrepancies exist. Refer to source for additional guidance.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 A-1

Appendix A

[CLASSIFICATION]
Place the classification at the top and bottom of every page of the attachments. Place the classification
marking at the front of each paragraph and subparagraph in parentheses. Refer to AR 380-5 for
classification and release marking instructions.
Copy ## of ## copies
Issuing headquarters
Place of issue
Date-time group of signature
Message reference number
Include heading if attachment is distributed separately from the base order or higher-level attachment.
APPENDIX 18–SPACE OPERATIONS TO ANNEX C OPERATION PLAN (OPLAN)/OPERATION
ORDER (OPORD) [number] [(code name)]—[issuing headquarters] [(classification of title)]
(U) References: List documents essential to understanding the attachment.
a. List maps and charts first. Map entries include series number, country, sheet names, or numbers,
edition, and scale.
b. List other references in subparagraphs labeled as shown.
c. Doctrinal references for space operations include FM 3-14, JP 3-14, and U.S. National Space
Policy.
(U) Time zone used throughout the Order: Write the time zone established in the base plan or order.
1. (U) Situation. Include information affecting space operations that paragraph 1 of the OPLAN or
OPORD does not cover or that needs expansion.
a. (U) General. Describe the overall general approach Army space operations will use to support
mission requirement, the likelihood of operating in a denied, degraded, and disrupted space operational
environment, the impact on equipment and to the mission, risk mitigation actions, and how to counter enemy
actions to place friendly forces in this environment.
(1) (U) Area of Interest. Describe the area of interest as it relates to space operations. Refer to
Annex B–Intelligence as required.
(2) (U) Area of Operations. Refer to Appendix 2–Operation Overlay to Annex C–Operations.
(3) (U) Terrain. Describe the aspects of terrain that impact space operations such as terrain
masking. Refer to Annex B–Intelligence as required.
(4) (U) Weather. Describe the aspects of terrestrial and space weather that impact space
operations. Refer to Annex B–Intelligence as required.
b. (U) Enemy Forces. List known locations and activities of enemy space capable assets and units. List
enemy space capabilities that can impact friendly operations. State expected enemy courses of action and
employment of enemy and commercial space assets. Refer to Annex B–Intelligence as required.
c. (U) Friendly Forces. Outline the higher headquarters’ plan for space operations and space support
teams including but not limited to space support elements, Army space support teams, and an organic space
weapons officer. List designation, location, and outline of plans of higher, adjacent, and other space
operations-related assets that support or impact the issuing headquarters or require coordination and
additional support. For example, the space coordinating authority and specified processes established for
the area of responsibility.

[page number]
[CLASSIFICATION]
Figure A-1. Sample Annex C, Appendix 18–Space Operations format

A-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Annex C, Appendix 18 Template

[CLASSIFICATION]
APPENDIX 18–SPACE OPERATIONS TO ANNEX C OPLAN/OPORD [number] [(code name)]—
[issuing headquarters] [(classification of title)]
(1) (U) Interagency, Intergovernmental, and Nongovernmental Organizations. Identify and
describe other organizations in the area of operations that may impact the conduct of space operations or
implementation of space-specific equipment, tactics, and capabilities. Consider all multinational, civil, and
nongovernmental organizations such as civilian relief agencies and other customers and providers of space-
based capabilities. Refer to Annex V–Interagency Coordination as required.
(2) (U) Civil Considerations. Describe the aspects of the civil situation that impact space
operations. Refer to Annex B–Intelligence and Annex K–Civil Affairs Operations as required.
(3) (U) Attachments and Detachments. List units attached or detached only as necessary to clarify
task organization. Refer to Annex A–Task Organization as required.
d. (U) Assumptions. List space operations-specific assumptions that support the annex development.
2. (U) Mission. State the mission of space operations in support of the base plan or order.
3. (U) Execution.
a. (U) Concept of Space Operations. Describe how space capabilities support the commander’s intent
and concept of operations. Establish the priorities of space support to units for each phase of the operation.
For example, electromagnetic interference resolution and defended asset list. Also address unique space
reliances or vulnerabilities related to unit systems and capabilities. Refer to Annex C–Operations as
required.
(1) (U) Description. Describe how space capabilities and services support the operations.
Emphasize the aspects of the Base plan that will require/affect space capabilities and services. Consider
deployment timelines when on-orbit assets must be moved or deployed into the AOR.
(2) (U) Employment. If operations are phased, discuss the employment of space assets during each
phase. Include discussion of priorities of access, usage, and capabilities in each phase.
b. (U) Tasks. Identify space tasks assigned to specific subordinate units, supporting command, or
agency that provides support to the plan. Refer to any tasks in base order. Provide a concise statement of the
task with sufficient detail to ensure that all elements essential to the operational concept are described
properly. If the operation is phased, discuss the tasks of both supported and supporting commands/agencies
during each phase. Identify space capabilities required to support the OPLAN, including the following specific
areas as applicable:
(1) (U) Space Situational Awareness. Address all capabilities and effects related to space situational
awareness [understanding] requirements.
(2) (U) Positioning, Navigation, and Timing. Provide navigational capabilities that would aid the
transit of ships, aircraft, personnel, or ground vehicles and determine the course and distance traveled or
position location. Provide Global Positioning System (GPS) accuracy to support GPS-aided munitions.
(3) (U) Space Control. Provide information on space capabilities performed by space forces, air
assets, or surface assets that ensure friendly forces and deny enemy forces the unrestricted use of space and
space capabilities. Identify targetable enemy assets and limitations of targeting. Address all capabilities,
effects, and limitations, related to offensive or defensive space control and navigation warfare requirements.
Coordinate all plans and activities with cyberspace and electronic warfare to ensure complimentary, not
redundant operations, including:
(a) (U) Defensive Space Control. Capabilities and effects related to defensive space control.

[page number]
[CLASSIFICATION]
Figure A-1. Sample Annex C, Appendix 18–Space Operations format (continued)

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 A-3

Appendix A

[CLASSIFICATION]
APPENDIX 18–SPACE OPERATIONS TO ANNEX C OPLAN/OPORD [number] [(code name)]—
[issuing headquarters] [(classification of title)]
(b) (U) Offensive Space Control. Capabilities and effects related to offensive space control.
(c) (U) Navigation Warfare. Capabilities and effects related to navigation warfare.
(4) (U) Satellite Communication and Satellite Operations. Describe the space operations
communications plan. Ensure defensive space priorities for satellite communication links are established and
coordinated based on operational priorities. Refer to Annex H–Signal as required.
(5) (U) Theater Missile Warning. Provide information on the notification of enemy ballistic missile
or space-weapon attacks evaluated from available sensor and sources and the possible effect on the
operational area. Provide notification of friendly ballistic missile launches and the impacts on the operational
areas that would require early warning of affected friendly forces and an estimated point of impact for each
launch. Establish provisions, in coordination with the air defense artillery officer, to disseminate information
quickly throughout the operational areas. Refer to Annex B–Intelligence, Annex D–Fires, and Annex E–
Protection as required.
(6) (U) Remote Sensing/Environmental Monitoring. Identify and list meteorological,
oceanographic, geodetic, and other environmental support information provided by space capabilities which
affect space, air, surface, or subsurface activities and assets. Refer to Annex G–Engineer as required.
(7) (U) Information Collection. Provide information pertaining to friendly and enemy forces in or
external to the operational areas that would aid in operations and force positioning. Refer to Annex L–
Information Collection as required.
(8) (U) Special Technical Operations. Provide information on the organization and synchronization
of the integrated Army and integrated joint special technical operations and alternate compensatory control
measures plans in support of the commander’s objectives. Refer to Annex S–Special Technical Operations as
required.
(9) (U) Nuclear Detonation. Provide information on the notification of detected nuclear detonations
that might affect the operation and require evaluation as to yield and location. Refer to Annex B–Intelligence
as required.
(10) (U) Command and Control. Provide information and an assessment on friendly space reliance
upon satellite communications, missile warning, and network architectures. Determine how organic unit
systems and equipment rely upon these communications paths (architectures)
(11) (U) Cyberspace Electromagnetic Activities. Integrate cyberspace electromagnetic activities to
optimally synchronize their effects. Refer to Annex C–Operations as required.
c. (U) Coordinating Instructions. List only instructions applicable to two or more subordinate units not
covered in the base plan or order. Document coordination and reachback support requests in accordance
with space coordinating authority guidance such as “Space Coordinating Plans” and other directives for the
area of responsibility; include unique equipment sustainment and technical points of contact.
4. (U) Sustainment. Identify priorities of sustainment for space operations key tasks and specify additional
instructions as required. Refer to Annex F–Sustainment as required.
a. (U) Logistics. Identify unique sustainment requirements, procedures, and guidance to support space
operations teams and operations. Specify procedures for specialized technical logistics support from external
organizations as necessary. Use subparagraphs to identify priorities and specific instructions for space
operations logistic support. Refer to Annex F–Sustainment and Annex P–Host-Nation Support as required.

[page number]
[CLASSIFICATION]
Figure A-1. Sample Annex C, Appendix 18–Space Operations format (continued)

A-4 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Annex C, Appendix 18 Template

[CLASSIFICATION]
APPENDIX 18–SPACE OPERATIONS TO ANNEX C OPLAN/OPORD [number] [(code name)]—
[issuing headquarters] [(classification of title)]
b. (U) Personnel. Use subparagraphs to identify priorities and specific instructions for human resources
support, financial management, legal support, and religious support. Refer to Annex F–Sustainment as
required.
c. (U) Health System Support. Identify availability, priorities, and instructions for medical care. Refer
to Annex F–Sustainment as required.
5. (U) Command and Signal.
a. (U) Command.
(1) (U) Location of the Commander and Key Leaders. State the location of the commander and key
space leaders such as the space coordinating authority, Combined Space Operations Center, electronic
warfare officers, and other key reachback leaders.
(2) (U) Succession of Command. State the succession of command if not covered in the unit’s
standard operating procedures.
(3) (U) Liaison Requirements. State the space liaison requirements not covered in the unit’s
standard operating procedures, such as air component coordination element or multinational space officers.
b. (U) Control.
(1) (U) Command Posts. Describe the employment of space command, control, and functional
chains including their location and contact information.
(2) (U) Reports. List space related reports not covered in standard operating procedures. Refer to
any space coordinating authority concept of operations or guidance and Annex R–Reports as required.
c. (U) Signal. Address any space-specific communications requirements such as secure chat
communications applications. These often require a lengthy approval process to tunnel through existing
networks and should be specified well in advance. Refer to Annex H–Signal as required.
ACKNOWLEDGE: Include only if attachment is distributed separately from the base order.
[Commander’s last name]
[Commander’s rank]
The commander or authorized representative signs the original copy. If the representative signs the original,
add the phrase “For the Commander.” The signed copy is the historical copy and remains in the
headquarters’ files.
OFFICIAL:
[Authenticator’s name]
[Authenticator’s position]
Use only if the commander does not sign the original attachment. If the commander signs the original, no
further authentication is required. If the commander does not sign, the signature of the preparing staff officer
requires authentication, and only the last name and rank of the commander appear in the signature block.
TABS: List lower-level attachments (tabs, and exhibits).
DISTRIBUTION: ONLY if distributed separately from the base order, Annex C, or higher-level attachment.

[page number]
[CLASSIFICATION]
Figure A-1. Sample Annex C, Appendix 18–Space Operations format (continued)

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 A-5

This page intentionally left blank.
 Glossary
The glossary lists acronyms and abbreviations and terms with Army or joint definitions,
and other selected terms. Where Army and joint definitions are different, (Army) follows
the term. Terms for which FM 3-14 is the proponent (authority) manual are marked with
an asterisk (*). The proponent manual for other terms is listed in parentheses after the
definition.

SECTION I – ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

A2 antiaccess
AD area denial
AOR area of responsibility
ARSST Army space support team
COA course of action
COP common operational picture
D3SOE denied, degraded, and disrupted space operational environment
DOD Department of Defense
DSC defensive space control
DSCS Defense Satellite Communications System
EME electromagnetic environment
EMOE electromagnetic operational environment
EMS electromagnetic spectrum
FFT friendly force tracking
G-2 assistant chief of staff, intelligence
G-3 assistant chief of staff, operations
G-6 assistant chief of staff, signal
GEO geosynchronous Earth orbit
GNSS global navigation satellite system
GPS Global Positioning System
IPB intelligence preparation of the battlefield
JTAGS joint tactical ground station (Army)
KM kilometers
LEO low Earth orbit
MDMP military decisionmaking process
NAVWAR navigation warfare
NIPRNET Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network
OE operational environment
OPLAN operation plan
OPORD operation order

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 Glossary-1

Glossary

OSC offensive space control

PACE primary, alternate, contingency, emergency
PNT positioning, navigation, and timing
RSSC regional satellite communications support center
SATCOM satellite communications
SCA space coordinating authority
SIPRNET SECRET Internet Protocol Router Network
SSA space situational awareness
SSE space support element
TENCAP tactical exploitation of national capabilities program
USASMDC United States Army Space and Missile Defense Command
USSPACECOM United States Space Command
WGS Wideband Global Satellite Communications
WSOC wideband satellite communications operations center

SECTION II – TERMS

aimpoint
(DOD) A point associated with a target and assigned for a specific weapon impact. (JP 3-60).
antiaccess
(DOD) Action, activity, or capability, usually long-range, designed to prevent an advancing enemy force
from entering an operational area. Also called A2. (JP 3-0)
area denial
(DOD) Action, activity, or capability, usually short-range, designed to limit an enemy force’s freedom
of action within an operational area. Also called AD. (JP 3-0)
core competency
(Army) An essential and enduring capability that a branch or an organization provides to Army
operations. (ADP 1-01)
defensive space control
(DOD) Active and passive measures taken to protect friendly space capabilities from attack, interference,
or unintentional hazards. Also called DSC. (JP 3-14)
*denied, degraded, and disrupted space operational environment
(Army) A composite of those conditions and influences in which space-enabled capabilities have been
impaired by hostile threats or non-hostile means. Also called D3SOE.
electromagnetic environment
(DOD). The resulting product of the power and time distribution, in various frequency ranges, of the
radiated or conducted electromagnetic emission levels encountered by a military force, system, or
platform when performing its assigned mission in its intended operational environment. (JP 3-13.1)
electromagnetic jamming
(DOD) The deliberate radiation, reradiation, or reflection of electromagnetic energy for the purpose of
preventing or reducing an enemy’s effective use of the electromagnetic spectrum, and with the intent of
degrading or neutralizing the enemy’s combat capability. (JP 3-13.1)
Electromagnetic operational environment
(DOD). The background electromagnetic environment and the friendly, neutral, and adversarial
electromagnetic order of battle within the electromagnetic area of influence associated with a given
operational area. (JP 6-01)

Glossary-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Glossary

electromagnetic spectrum
(DOD). The range of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation from zero to infinity. It is divided into 26
alphabetically designated bands. (JP 3-13.1)
friendly force tracking
(DOD) The process of fixing, observing, and reporting the location and movement of friendly forces.
Also called FFT. (JP 3-09)
Global Positioning System
(DOD) A satellite-based radio navigation system operated by the Department of Defense to provide all
military, civil, and commercial users with precise positioning, navigation, and timing. Also called GPS.
(JP 3-14)
hazard
(DOD) A condition with the potential to cause injury, illness, or death of personnel; damage to or loss
of equipment or property; or mission degradation. (JP 3-33)
hostile environment
(DOD) Operational environment in which host government forces, whether opposed to or receptive to
operations that a unit intends to conduct, do not have control of the territory and population in the
intended operational area. (JP 3-0)
information operations
(DOD) The integrated employment, during military operations, of information-related capabilities in
concert with other lines of operation to influence, disrupt, corrupt, or usurp the decision-making of
adversaries and potential adversaries while protecting our own. Also called IO. (JP 3-13)
measure of effectiveness
(DOD) An indicator used to measure a current system state, with change indicated by comparing multiple
observations over time. Also called MOE. See also combat assessment; mission. (JP 5-0)
measure of performance
(DOD) An indicator used to measure a friendly action that is tied to measuring task accomplishment.
Also called MOP. (JP 5-0)
mission variables
(Army) The categories of specific information needed to conduct operations. (ADP 1-01)
navigation warfare
(DOD) Deliberate defensive and offensive action to assure and prevent positioning, navigation, and
timing information through coordinated employment of space, cyberspace, and electronic warfare
operations. Also called NAVWAR. (JP 3-14)
negation
(DOD) In space operations, measures to deceive, disrupt, degrade, deny, or destroy space systems. (JP
3-14)
offensive space control
(DOD) Offensive operations conducted for space negation. Also called OSC. (JP 3-14)
operational variables
(Army) A comprehensive set of information categories used to define an operational environment. (ADP
1-01)
permissive environment
(DOD) Operational environment in which host country military and law enforcement agencies have
control, as well as the intent and capability to assist operations that a unit intends to conduct. (JP 3-0)
planning
(Army) The art and science of understanding a situation, envisioning a desired future, and laying out
effective ways of bringing that future about. (ADP 5-0)
running estimate

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 Glossary-3

Glossary

(Army) The continuous assessment of the current situation used to determine if the current operation is
proceeding according to the commander’s intent and if planned future operations are supportable. (ADP
5-0)
space asset
(DOD) Equipment that is an individual part of a space system, which is or can be placed in space or
directly supports space activity terrestrially. (JP 3-14)
space capability
(DOD) 1. The ability of a space asset to accomplish a mission. 2. The ability of a terrestrial-based asset
to accomplish a mission in or through space. (JP 3-14)
space control
(DOD) Operations to ensure freedom of action in space for the United States and its allies and deny an
adversary freedom of action in space. (JP 3-14)
space coordinating authority
(DOD) The responsibility to plan, integrate, and coordinate space operations. Also called SCA. (JP 3-14)
space domain
(DOD) The area above the altitude where atmospheric effects on airborne objects become negligible.
(JP 3-14)
space environment
(DOD) The environment corresponding to the space domain, where electromagnetic radiation, charged
particles, and electric and magnetic fields are the dominant physical influences, and that encompasses
the Earth’s ionosphere and magnetosphere, interplanetary space, and the solar atmosphere. (JP 3-59)
space forces
(DOD) The space and terrestrial systems, equipment, facilities, organizations, and personnel, or
combination thereof, necessary to conduct space operations. (JP 3-14)
space joint operating area
(DOD) The operational area, bounded by the space domain, assigned to Commander, United States
Strategic Command, in which space operations are conducted. Also called SJOA. (JP 3-14)

Note. It is expected SJOA will eventually be modified to reference USSPACECOM.

space situational awareness

(DOD) The requisite foundational, current, and predictive knowledge and characterization of space
objects and the operational environment upon which space operations depend. Also called SSA. (JP 3-
14)
space superiority
(DOD) The degree of control in space of one force over any others that permits the conduct of its
operations at a given time and place without prohibitive interference from terrestrial or space-based
threats. (JP 3-14)
space weather
(DOD) The conditions and phenomena in space and specifically in the near-Earth environment that may
affect space assets or space operations. (JP 3-59)
threat
(Army) Any combination of actors, entities, or forces that have the capability and intent to harm United
States forces, United States national interests, or the homeland. (ADP 3-0)
vulnerability
(DOD) 2. The characteristics of a system that can cause it to be degraded (incapability to perform the
designated function or mission) as a result of being subjected to a certain level of effects in an unnatural
(man-made) hostile environment. (JP 3-60)

Glossary-4 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 References
All Web sites were accessed on 7 October 2019.

REQUIRED PUBLICATIONS
These documents must be available to the intended users of this publication.
DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, July 2019.
ADP 1-02, Terms and Military Symbols, 14 August 2018.

RELATED PUBLICATIONS
These documents contain relevant supplemental information.
National Security Strategy, December 2017. Documents is available at
[Link]
National Space Policy, 28 June 2010. Documents is available at:
[Link]
2013 Army Strategic Planning Guidance, 2013. Documents is available at:
[Link]

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PUBLICATIONS

CJCSM 3130.03A, Planning and Execution Planning Formats and Guidance, 4 February 2019.
[Link]
[Link]
DODD 3100.10, Space Policy, 18 October 2012.
[Link]

JOINT PUBLICATIONS
Most joint publications are available online from the Joint Doctrine Education and Training Electronic
Information System (JDEIS) webpage at: [Link]
JP 2-0, Joint Intelligence, 22 October 2013.
JP 3-0, Joint Operations, 17 January 2017.
JP 3-09, Joint Fire Support, 10 April 2019.
JP 3-13, Information operations, 27 November 2012.
JP 3-13.1, Electronic Warfare, 8 February 2012.
JP 3-14, Space Operations, 10 April 2018.
JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters, 31 January 2018.
JP 3-59, Meteorological and Oceanographic Operations, 10 January 2018.
JP 3-60, Joint Targeting, 28 September 2018.
JP 5-0, Joint Planning, 16 June 2017.
JP 6-01, Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations, 20 March 2012.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PUBLICATIONS

Most Army doctrinal publications are available online: [Link]
ADP 1-01, Doctrine Primer, 31 July 2019.

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 References-1

References

ADP 2-0, Intelligence, 31 July 2019.

ADP 3-0, Operations, 31 July 2019.
ADP 3-19, Fires, 31 July 2019.
ADP 3-37, Protection, 31 July 2019.
ADP 4-0, Sustainment, 31 July 2019.
ADP 5-0, The Operations Process, 31 July 2019.
ADP 6-0, Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces, 31 July 2019.
AR 5-22, The Army Force Modernization Proponent System, 28 October 2015.
AR 380-5, Department of the Army Information Security Program, 29 September 2000.
AR 600-3, The Army Personnel Development System, 16 September 2019.
AR 900-1, Department of the Army Space Policy, 21 April 2017.
ATP 2-01.3, Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield, 1 March 2019.
ATP 2-22.7, Geospatial Intelligence, 26 March 2015.
ATP 5-19, Risk Management, 14 April 2014.
FM 3-27, Army Global Ballistic Missile Defense Operations, 31 March 2014.
FM 6-0, Commander and Staff Organization and Operations, 5 May 2014.
FM 6-27/MCTP 11-10C, The Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Land Warfare, 7 August 2019.

OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Most NATO document is available on the NATO Standardization Office website:
[Link]
AJP-3.3, Allied Joint Doctrine for Air and Space Operations, 8 April 2016.

PRESCRIBED FORMS
No Forms Entries.

REFERENCE FORMS
Forms are available online: [Link]
DA Form 2028, Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms.

References-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Index
Entries are by paragraph number, unless otherwise indicated.

A Denied, degraded, and disrupted Integrated broadcast service, 1-16, 1-

space operational environment, 1- 38, 3-117
Administrative control, 3-63, 3-127 45, 1-59, 2-25, 2-55 thru 2-64, 2-89, Intelligence, Information operations,
Advanced extremely high frequency, 2-98, 3-4, 3-23, 3-26, 3-30, 4-3, 4- cyber, electronic warfare, and
3-35, 3-64 6, 4-40, 4-46, 4-48, 4-50, 4-66 thru space, 1-41 thru 1-43
Air and missile defense, 1-38, 3-84, 3- 4-69 Intelligence preparation of the
89, 3-91, 4-10, 4-46, 4-63, 5-47 battlefield, pg. vii, 1-9, 1-23, 3-29,
Antiaccess, pg. vii, 1-5, 1-38, 1-39, 1- 3-96, 3-97, 5-17, 5-35, 6-1 thru 6-6,
44, 1-45, 1-48, 2-48 thru 2-55, 3-2,
E 6-8, 6-15, 6-17, 6-18, 6-22 thru 6-
3-26, 4-66 Electromagnetic environment, 1-32, 25
Appendix 18 to Annex C, pg. vi, pg. 2-37, 2-38, 2-42, 2-45, 2-56, 2-57,
vii, 1-25, 4-23, 4-39, 5-9, 5-21, pg. 2-75, 3-47, 5-38, 5-72.
5-9, pg. 6-1, 6-22, A-1 thru A-3,
J
Electromagnetic spectrum, 1-20, 1-
pgs. A-2 thru A-5 36, 1-50, 2-35, 2-37, 2-39, 2-42, 2- Joint friendly force tracking, 1-31, 1-
Area denial, 1-5, 1-38, 1-39, 1-44, 1- 56, 2-57, 2-59, 2-65, 2-66, 2-68, 2- 61
45, 1-48, 2-26, 2-48 thru 2-55, 3-2, 71, 2-74, 2-76, 2-79, 2-97, 3-19, 3- Joint Tactical Ground Stations, 1-22,
3-26, 4-66 25, 3-131, 3-135, 5-10, 6-11 1-61, 3-84, 3-90, 3-129, 4-72
Army design methodology, 5-1, 5-4
Army space core competencies, 1-58
Army space coordination element, 1- F L
29, 4-21 Frequencies, 2-39 thru 2-41, 2-74 Legal considerations, 1-16, 2-86, 4-6,
Army Space proponent contribution, Friendly force tracking, 1-15, 1-18, 1- 4-24, 4-61, 5-26, 5-31, pg. A-5
3-129 31, 1-61, 2-31, 3-10, 3-14, 3-108 Low Earth orbit, 1-52 thru 1-54, 1-56,
Army space support team, 1-26, 1-59, thru 3-115, 1-29, 3-129, 4-45, 4-50, pg.1-13, 4-30, 6-8
3-120, 3-129, 4-5, 4-11, 4-13, 4-14, 4-56, 4-64, 4-72, 5-59, 6-25
4-21, 4-72, 4-80, pg. 5-9
M
G
B Medium Earth orbit, 1-52, 1-53, pg. 1-
Geosynchronous Earth orbit, 1-52, 1- 13
Bandwidth comparison, pg. 2-8 53, pg. 1-13, 4-30, 6-8 Military decisionmaking process, 1-
Global Broadcast Service, 1-20, 1-30, 23, 2-32, 4-5, 4-22, 5-1, 5-4, 5-12
C 3-64, 3-129, 4-72 thru 5-14, 5-28, pg. 5-4, pgs. 5-6
Global navigation satellite system, 1- thru 5-9, 5-36, 6-4, 6-19
Combined space operations center, 4- 18, 1-19, 1-45, 3-25 thru 3-30, 3- Missile warning, 1-15, 1-26, pg. 1-13,
21, 4-73, pg. 5-3 132, 3-135, 4-29, 4-45 2-5, 2-7, 2-8, 2-24 thru 2-27, 2-30,
Common interactive broadcast, 1-16, Global Positioning System, 1-18, 1- 2-38, 2-46, 2-67, 3-1, 3-38, 3-84
1-38, 3-35 52, pg. 1-13, 2-24 thru 2-31, 2-64, thru 3-94, 3-129, 4-21, 4-45, 4-46,
Common operational picture, 1-31, 3- 2-77, 3-11 thru 3-19, 3-21, 3-23, 3- 4-50, 4-54, 4-56, 4-64, 4-72, pg. 5-
86, 3-92, 3-109 thru 3-117, 4-6, 4- 26, 3-98, 3-101, 3-111, 4-45, 4-46, 3, 5-59, 6-14, 6-17, 6-25, pg. A-3,
8, 4-47, 4-53, 5-54, 3-59 4-50, 4-60, 4-62, pg. 5-3, 5-59, 6- pg. A-4
Consolidated SATCOM System 12, 6-15, 6-21, 6-25, pg. A-3 Mission variables, pg. vii, 2-13, 2-32
Expert, 1-20, 3-49 thru 3-53, 3-63, thru 2-34, 5-2, 5-18, pg. 5-5, 6-4
3-65, 3-79, 3-83, 4-72 Mobile User Objective System, 1-21,
H 3-35, 3-39 thru 3-41, 4-44, 3-64, 3-
D Hazard, 2-3, 2-59, 2-61, 2-67 2-77 129, 4-72
High altitude operations, 1-41 thru 1-
Defense Satellite Communications 43, 1-61
System, 1-20, 1-21, 3-35, 3-42, 3-
N
64, 3-70, 3-74 thru 3-77, 3-80, 3-81, Navigation warfare, 1-19, 1-59, 1-60,
3-129 I 2-25, 2-85, 2-86, pg.3-1, 3-20, 3-25

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 Index-1

Index

thru 3-30, 3-129, 3-131, 3-132, 3- 15, 6-17, 6-20, 6-21, 6-25, A-2, pg. 28, 4-54, 4-56, 4-62, 4-64, 4-72, pg.
135, 4-46, 4-56, 4-64, pg. A-4 A-4 A-3, pg. A-4
Commercial satellite Space situation template, pg. 6-3
O communications, 1-20, 1-30, 2-24, Space superiority, pg. vi, 1-8, 2-6
2-26, 2-27, 2-28, 3-31, 3-32, 3-37, Space support element, 1-25, 1-26, 1-
On-orbit assets, 1-21, 2-60, 2-89, 3-7, 3-44 thru 3-47, 3-54, 3-55, 3-64, 3- 59, pg. 4-1, 4-7 thru 4-14, 4-17 thru
3-69, 4-29, 4-75, pg. A-3 129, 6-17, 6-21, pg. A-2 4-23, 4-79, 4-80, 5-12, pg. 5-3, pg.
Operation order, 4-39, 5-24, A-2, pg. Narrowband satellite 5-9, 5-49 thru 5-56, 6-3 thru 6-9, 6-
A-2 communications, 1-20, 1-21, 1-29, 13 thru 6-20, 6-23 thru 6-25, A-2,
Operation plan/planning, 1-59, 2-71, pg. 2-8, 3-35, 3-37, 3-39 thru 3-41, pg. A-2
2-73, 2-74, 3-58, 3-126, 4-7, 4-9, 4- 3-44, 3-52, 3-54, 3-56, 3-70, 3-129 Special Operations Forces, 1-26, 4-65
12, 4-24, 4-31, 4-77, 5-4, 5-10, 5- Protected band satellite
12, 5-27, pg. 5-4, pg. 5-6, 5-27, 6-2, communications, 1-20, 1-30, pg.2-
8, 3-35, 3-37, 3-43, 3-54, 3-64, 3-
T
A-1, A-3, pg. A-3
Operational control, 1-27, 3-79, 3- 129 Tactical control, 3-126
126, 3-127 Wideband satellite Tactical exploitation of national
Operational variables, pg. vii, 2-13, 2- communications, 1-20, 1-21, 1-29, capability program, 1-15, 1-33, 1-
19 thru 2-22, 2-32, 2-33 pg. 2-8, 3-35, 3-37, 3-42, 3-44, 3- 34, 3-38, 3-121 thru 3-124
Orbital characteristics, 1-52, pg. 1-13, 45, 3-53, 3-54, 3-64, 3-70, 3-76, 3- Targeting 1-18, 1-19, 1-25, 1-37, 2-
3-88 129, 4-72 24, 2-25, 2-31, 2-35, 2-64, 3-10, 3-
Orbits, 1-51 thru 1-56, pg, 1-13, 2-79, Satellite reconnaissance advanced 14, 3-28, 3-34, 3-38, 3-132, 4-6, 4-
2-93, 3-11, 3-88, 4-30, 5-41, 6-8, 6- notice, 4-45 10, 4-25, 4-26, 4-40, 4-41, 4-45, 4-
15 Satellite operations, 1-15, 1-21, 1-26, 57, 4-59, 4-60, 4-82, 5-10, 5-17, 5-
Overhead persistent infrared, 1-22, 1- 2-25, pg. 3-1, 3-48, 3-55, 3-67, 3-69 30 thru 5-40, 5-43, 5-45, 6-17, 6-21,
36, 1-38, 3-84, 3-89, 3-92, 4-46, 4- thru 3-73, 3-129, 3-138, 4-54 pg. A-4
50 Space capabilities, 1-15 Target activities, 5-30
Space control, vi, 1-15, 1-17, 1-19, 1- Theater event system, 3-84, 3-89 thru
26, 1-27, 1-10, 1-45, 1-59, 1-60, 2- 3-91
P 6, 2-7, 2-24, 2-25, 2-58, 2-81, pg. 3- Theater missile warning, 1-22, 3-84,
Positioning, navigation, and timing, 1- 1, 3-20 thru 3-24, 3-26, 3-28, 3-120, 3-90, 3-92, 4-21, pg. A-3
1, 1-15, 1-18, 1-19, 1-31, 1-49, 3-129, 3-132, 4-54, 4-56, 4-62, 4- Threat, 1-8, 1-44, 1-45, 2-3, 2-44 thru
pg.1-13, 1-60, 2-4, 2-7, 2-8, 2-24 64, 4-82, pg. 5-3, pg. 5-5, 6-2, 6-3, 2-47, 2-49 thru 2-56, 2-59 thru 2-
thru 2-27, 2-29, 2-46, 2-60, 2-64, 2- 6-17, 6-25, pg. A-4 61, 2-65 thru 2-67, 2-77 thru 2-81,
67, 2-85, 2-86, 3-10, 3-25, 3-26, 3- Space control planning team, 1-27, 1- 2-83 thru 2-85, 5-17, 6-6, 6-17 thru
28, 3-36, 3-96, 3-100, 3-111, 3-129, 40, 3-120 6-19, 6-21
4-4, 4-54, 4-56, 4-58, 4-60, 4-62, 4- Space coordinating authority, pg. vi, Training considerations, 4-66 thru 4-
64, 4-69, pg. 5-3, 6-17, pg. A-3 1-28, 4-16, 4-21, 4-77 thru 4-82, pg. 69
A-2, pg. A-4, pg.A-5
Space operational environment, 1-45,
R pg. 2-2, pg. 5-5, pg. 5-6
U
Regional satellite communications Contested, pg. 2-9 Unified command plan, 4-73
support center, 1-20, 3-49, 3-50, 3- Space operations across the joint Unified Land Operations, pg. v, 1-1,
52, 3-54 thru 3-79, 3-83,3-129, 4- model, 2-65 thru 2-76 1-5, 1-8, 1-12, 1-14, 1-18, 1-29, 1-
72 Space planner, 2-3, 2-22, 2-47, 4-23, 46, pg. 2-1, 2-6, 2-18, 2-37, 2-62, 2-
Risk management, 2-59, 2-77, 2-82 4-28, 4-31 thru 4-40, 5-7 thru 5-12, 85, 2-92, 2-103, 2-104, 3-8, 3-26, 3-
thru 2-85, 4-63, 5-17, pg. 5-5 5-14 thru 5-25, 5-29, 5-30, 5-43 138, 4-17, 4-51
Space planning, 1-26, 1-28, 2-83, 2- United States Space Command, 3-58,
88, 4-13, 4-17, 4-37, 4-76, pg. 5-2, 3-61, 3-62, 3-83, 4-73, 4-75, 4-81,
S 5-14, pg. 5-4 pg. 5-3, 6-2, 6-3
Satellite communications System Space Policy, 2-91
Army, vii, 2-91, 2-92, 2-99 thru 2-
Expert, 3-49 thru 3-53, 4-72, 4-75
101, 2-102 V
Satellite communications, 1-1, 1-7, 1-
15, 1-19 thru 1-21, 1-25, 1-29 thru Department of Defense, 2-91, 2-92, Vulnerability, 1-19, 1-40, 2-81, 3-4,
1-31, 1-37, 1-39, 1-49, 1-52, 2-8, 2- 2-97, 2-102 pg. 3-7
24 thru 2-28, 2-30, 2-41, 2-46, 2-60, National, vii, 2-91, 2-92, 2-93, 2-
2-67, 2-85, 2-86, pg. 3-1 3-10, 3-21, 95, 2-102, pg. A-2
Space segments, 1-49, 2-46, 3-24 W
3-31 thru 3-65, 3-68, 3-72, 3-74
thru 3-76, 3-79, 3-83, 3-96, 3-98. 3- Space situational awareness, pg. vi, 1- Warfighting functions, 1-3, 1-11, 1-
100, 3-1021 3-115, 3-129, 3-137, 3- 15, 1-17, 1-26, 1-40, 1-49, 2-5, 2-24 14, 1-47, 1-59, 4-5
138, 4-20, 4-45, 4-46, 4-49, 4-50, 4- thru 2-29, 2-94, 2-95, 3-2, 3-5 thru Fires, 4-59, 4-60
54, 4-56, 4-58, 4-60, 4-62, 4-64, 4- 3-9, 3-21, 3-70, 3-73, 3-78, 3-100, Intelligence, 4-57, 4-58
69, 4-72, 4-75, 5-59, 6-12, 6-14, 6- 3-129, 4-7, 4-8, 4-13, 4-21, 4-27, 4- Command and control, 4-53, 4-54

Index-2 FM 3-14 30 October 2019

 Index

Movement and maneuver, 4-55, 4- 6-8 thru 6-10, 6-13, 6-14, 6-25, pg. 3-42, 3-64, 3-70, 3-74 thru 3-78, 3-
56 A-2 80, 3-81, 3-129, 4-72
Protection, 4-63, 4-64 Staff weather officer, 4-10, 4-46, 5- Wideband Satellite Communications
Sustainment, 4-61, 4-62 47, 6-10, 6-13, 6-25 operations center, 1-21, 1-61, 3-55,
Weather, 1-30, pg. 1-13, 2-13, 2-24, Space, 2-38, 2-77, 2-85, 2-93, 3-21, 3-67, 3-70, 3-71, 3-74 thru 3-83, 3-
2-30, 2-32, 2-77, 2-85, 2-93, 3-1, 3- 3-96 thru 3-102, 4-58, 6-8 thru 6- 129, 3-138
95, 3-99, 3-101 thru 3-103, 4-45, 4- 14, 6-17, 6-25, 6-45, A-2, pg. A-2
46, 4-58, 4-60, 4-62, 4-64, 6-1, 6-4, Wideband Global Satellite
Communications, 1-20, 1-21, 3-35,

30 October 2019 FM 3-14 Index-3

This page intentionally left blank.
 FM 3-14
30 October 2019

By Order of the Secretary of the Army:

JAMES C. MCCONVILLE
General, United States Army
Chief of Staff

Official:

KATHLEEN S. MILLER
Administrative Assistant
to the Secretary of the Army
1929601

DISTRIBUTION:
Distributed in electronic media only (EMO).
 -•
... �·
•

PIN: 082461-000