Cirtoaje Vasile Can Vo Quoc Ba Ahn Tran Quoc Inequalities Wi PDF
Cirtoaje Vasile Can Vo Quoc Ba Ahn Tran Quoc Inequalities Wi PDF
pe'F (c~1),
Proof. We need to show that f(c) > 0, where
F()= cP -1—pe@(c~1)
1
We have f/(c) = 5
ni
pe‘ g(c), where
i
g(c)=2c? —(p+1)e+p-1,
sO=@0+Y(cF -1).
Since g’(c) 2 0, g(c) is strictly increasing. In the first case (namely ¢ > 1), we
have g(c) > g(1) = 0, f'(c) > 0, f(c) is strictly increasing, and hence f(c) >
£(1) = 0. In the second case (namely 0 < c < 1), we have g(c) < g(1) =0,
J) SO, f(c) is strictly decreasing, and hence fc) > f(1) = 0. Qo
Problem 1.19. Let a and b be Positive real numbers. Prove that
(@+¥8) (SS 1 ) <2,
a+3b Vb+3a
(Michael Rozenberg)
Proof. By the AM-GM Inequality, we have
and
From these two inequalities, we deduce that
vat+vb_1f a 3
Vva+3b 2(as5*3)
‘Two-variable inequalities 23
Similarly, we also have
faeVb 21/_) 3)
b+3a 2\atb 2
Therefore
1 1 1 (2 +b
et Se) 55 +
(var v5) (x 7m) 2\a+b
Equality holds if and only ifa = b. a
Problem 1.20. Let x and y be positive real numbers such that
xty + ¥2x? + Ixy +3y? =4.
Determine the largest value of x*y.
(Michael Rozenberg)
Proof. From the given condition, we see that x + y <4. Therefore, it can be
written as >
2x? +2xy t3y?=(4-x-y),
which is equivalent to
(x +4)? +2(y +2) = 40,
ar
xy? 2
a(2+5) +@+yP=20
By the AM-GM Inequality and Hélder's Inequality, we have
“ 2
(2+3)'+(2+3) +ente3 [(2+ “4 »| “33 (2+ i=)
From this, we get ;
z
a/x?y
> xy\
zoza(2+ 5
5)
2y< =-1).
wysaa( (3
we24 Vasile Girtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
5
Since we have equality for x =2y = 4 (5 - :) , this means that
3
| max{x*y} = 32 (V1) .
Oo
Problem 1.21. Let x and y be real numbers such that y > 0 and y(y +1) <
(x+1)*. Prove that
y(y-1) 1. On the other hand, from the known inequality
t, 2,2
(be +ca+ab)| —+—+—] 29,
be ca ab
we obtain a+ b-+c > 3abe. The desired inequality follows now by summing up
the following inequalities66 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
We have
ryt 2 eb) efb=0)
b?+10 +10 bet+1 (b?+1)be+1) (c2+1)(be +1)
(b= be-1)
© (BF FINE + D(be +1) -
and
1 4. 2 —be+3-3a7b atat+b+ce~3abc) |
a+1 0 be+1l 2 a?+1be+1) Aa? +1/(be+1) ~
The proof is completed. Qo
Problem 2.27. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
a b? 2
Gat byaate) * @b+clab+a) * Getalactb) = 3
(Tigran Sloyan)
Proof. Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
a a a!
(2a+ bate) 4a? +2ab+2act be (2a? 4+ bc) + Qala tb +c)
a 1 2
<2 | +
9 | 2a? + be qarets|
1 2a a
=c|— +> }-
9latbte 2a?+be
Adding this and its analogous inequalities, we get
a it a
Learers <5 (+Tax)
and thus, it suffices to prove that
Be
soa tea £1
2b? +ca © 2c? +ab~’
2a? + be
which is equivalent to
be ca
ab
rage Oy
bet 2a? * ca 2b% * ab+ 20 =
Three-variable inequalities _ 67
Using the AM-GM Inequality, we have
be br bec? _ bc?
be+2a? bc? + 2a7be — bc? +a%(b? +07) b2c? + c7a2 +a7b?
Adding this and its analogous inequalities, we get the desired result. It is easy
to see that equality holds if and only ifa = b =c. a
Problem 2.28. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers such that a+ b +c = 1. Prove
that
ab be ca
soot oo st ooo Ss
3ab+2b+e Bbe+2+a 3cat+2a+b 4
Proof. Note that
3ab+2b+c=3ab+c(at+b+c)+2b=(ab+be+ca)+(2ab+c?)+b+b.
Therefore, by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
1 é 1 1 ie 1 pig
3ab+2b+e~ 16\ab+bet+ca 2ab+e2 bb)”
It follows that
ab 4. ab ab
SS i
Deas eh (arise 2ab +2 )
31 ab 315 = é
16° 1642ab+c2 16° 32 2ab+c? J’
In addition, from the AM-GM Inequality,
a e
ss 2 a=
2ab +c? a+b? +c?
Combining this with the above inequality, we get
y ab » 3 + 13 tas:
3ab+2b+c~ 16° 32 4
as desired. Equality holds if and only if a = b68 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Problem 2.29. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
B3 Cs
@+ abe +O babe * Spal pabe 2h
(Nguyen Van Thach)
c
: . a
First proof. Setting x=, y= 5 and ==, we have xys=1, and
a 1 1 xyz ye
@B+bitabe yy ya, % l4x8+x2y xystittxty tay tye
z
So, we have to prove that
ye 2x xy
Stayt Pane a 2
xU4xy tye y?tystex "®t extxy
1,
which is true since by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
Y yz > Oztextxy?
wet xy tye” Sys? txy bys)
Equality holds if and only if x
2, ie. if and only ifa =b =c o
Second proof. Multiplying each side of the desired inequality by a3 +b? +c3 +
abc, we can rewrite it as follows
ye (a3 +b? +c? +abc)
- >a +b? 402 tabe
a+b? +abe 2a° +b? +c? tabe,
93
Larera 2
c2q?
pre tips
Lies rag 2
Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
ge 2
2a + 53 2
[= eas [Dove (a? +b3 +abc)] = (Se a).
Since
Soca? +b +abe) = (Mea)’,
the conclusion follows. oa
Three-variable inequalities
Problem 2.30. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
1 1 1 3
esata
— + :
ava+b b¥b+e cvera~ Y2abe
(Phan Thanh Nam)
First proof. Due to homogeneity, we may assume that abc = 1. Then, there
,b=7,¢=~, Making
were
exist some positive real numbers x, y, # such that a=
y
n, we can rewrite the desired inequality as
Fg EE,
Vx0+y2) Vy? +2x) Vale? +xy)
Now, using twice the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality and then the AM-GM Inequal-
ity, we get
y? . Qa)
Vey? +yz) V7 Vey? +y2)
(ay)
(Dey) [Le?+]
ava (Si2)" :
2[/2de) (Sey) Ls
and thus, it suffices to prove that
this substitu
ee
2v2(Sox)°
+3) xy
A(x ty +2)? 23x? +y? +27) +9(xy + ye +2x),
which is equivalent to the well-known inequality
eP+y +s? >xy+yetex
Equality holds if and only ifa=b =c a
si d a 2be _ 2ca _ 2ab ie 4
‘econd proof. Let x = aaa Vege = Vara fe nee
to prove that x + y +z > 3. Since (x+y +2)? > 3(xy + yz +2zx), it suffices to
prove the stronger inequality
2s 2a 2b
SS §-— ——— + ————
(a +b\b+aQ /(b+eeta) W(c+a)(at+b)
3Sxytye+ex=70
Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
By the AM-GM Inequality and the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
2a a a
Lyra Lise “Lay
At b+eP_
= Sat+3y ab +3) 7 ab"
so it is enough to check that
Aa +b +c)? > 3(a? +b? +c?) +9(ab + be +ca),
or equivalently,
a+b? +c? >ab+be+ca.
Of course, this is true and so our proof is completed Oo
Problem 2.31. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
a+b
a bree
boc a” b+e
be:
a+b
(Belarus 1998)
bt+e
2);
(atbtc)(a-c)?
First proof. Note that the inequality is equivalent to
a+b
fero+e($ +3+8-2) @+i+a(¢
and thus it can be rewritten as
cab, bc
S+S-2a+b+0)2
c (a+ b\b+e)
2 2 —by eer -ay?
ve etbteyn Oo by + Oo 2 _ feo ay a) 3
ca b ¢ a
bc +b%c— a)? +-e%a—b}?
8 gap gee Pere + be~ a)? + 2a- by =
b 2abe
it suffices to prove that
(a—b)*
—= +t
(c-a? _ (a+b+c)a-cy
a (a+bb+e)
Three-variable inequalities 71
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we get
(ab)? 4 (b-c)? _ (a-cP?
b c b+e’
and thus, it remains to show that
1 1, atb+e
bte a” (a+b)b+c)’
This is equivalent to
bla+b+c)
aE 5G)
a(a+b)(b+c) ~
which is obviously true. Equality holds if and te ifa=b=c. o
Second proof, After writing x = © ; and y = —, we get
y a+b x+1 ‘Nam_opg
ax’ be It+y’ bea xt1"
One may rewrite the inequality as
yt txty ity? > xy + 2oxy +2xry?
Now, we apply the AM-GM Inequality to obtain
xty?+x_ 4
Sytxtyi ty?
2Bxy,
2
Adding up these three inequalities, we get the desired result. o
> axy?,
x? 4y?> dxy,
Third proof. The original inequality is equivalent to
mt a(t Eft je
( b+) tle B+ (5-zen) Bag
or ,
b? ac be a+2b
+ 4
b+) bb+e) * alatb)~ atb
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
wae 4 be MOH ales
bre) * +e) * ala+b) Fe) h(a)
= (E/E y¥).72 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Thus, it suffices to prove that
b a be S| b
(2 (E+ +E) 2 [SR oro+e+n)]
b+ b
pecaize SOTO eanienre)
+(b+c)+(a+b)=
(/2+/E+
which is equivalent to
, this inequality becomes
&)'s = aaa (a+ 2b\2b +e)
ab | ac
a +4 Spe bebeze> 2a b4b-+2¢ pe =
cb b°
or
ab. be
—+—22b
Of course, this is true and our proof is thus completed, a
Fourth proof. Multiplying each side of the desired inequality by b + > 0, we
can rewrite it as
atb+e) | b(b+e) | elb-+e) (b+c)
a at ab tet ;
b a +b
which is equivalent to
b 2 2
ee oe eS pe OEP
b a ae a+b
Now, applying the AM-GM Inequality and the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we
get
ac BP? | (b+)?
= en
b boa a+b
Adding up these three inequalities, the conclusion follows. o
Problem 2.32. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
a bie (a-c?
>+24+-234+——— _
bt eta? 3* tbe tea
(Yo Quoc Ba Can, Vasile Cirtoaje)
Three-variable inequalities __ 2B
First proof. Expanding and combining like terms, the inequality can be written
as
ab? ate be®
b? + — + — + — 3 2ab + 2be.
cb a
It is equivalent to
be?
— +ab—2be
a
which is true since by the AM-GM Inequality, we have
be?
— +ab > 2be,
a
ab? ae
ta +2 30d.
¢
The proof is completed. Equality holds if and only if a = b
Second proof. We will consider two cases
The first case is when c > 3a. In this case, we write the inequality as follows
ab c-3a (c-a?
£8 Set
bv ea ~ab+be+ca
Applying the Cauchy Schwarz Inequality, we have
a c~3a_ (c— 3a)? s 4a? ‘
b* a 4ab * (e—3aa 7 ab+be * ca
(2ate~3a)?__(e-ay?
““ab+be+ca ab+be+ca’
The second case is when 3a > c. Since ab+ be +ca > b(a +6), it suffices to
prove that
which is equivalent to
id c (
+22 (3-£)b+ ;
c a atc
By the AM-GM Inequality, we have74 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
and thus, it is enough to prove that
(a-c) _ c(3a—e)?
ate > 42 |
or equivalently,
e(3a~c) , e(3a~c?
ato ~ 4a?
This is true since, by the AM-GM Inequality, we have
4a? > (3a—c)(a+c).
Third proof. As in the first proof, we need to prove that
2, ab? ae, be?
B+ 4+ +—— 2 dab + 2be,
This inequality is equivalent to
bbe? ca?
Cad tenet (FM a pen ea) B(a-
cf a
or
oe a ee
Fla bP+(b-oP (ao OEE ar, ea. Heo
>(a—cP.
z = 2(a-cy.
This rewrites as
(a= bM(b+2c) | (b= cP e+2a) . (a e)a~2h)
b ¢ = b .
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we get
(a—b)°(b + 2c) cP(¢+2a)_ [(a—b)+(b-c)]}?
b ¢ Bb c
b42¢ * o42a
_ (a~cP(b+2c)(e+2a)
~— Qab+2be+2c2—”
and thus it is sufficient to show that
(b+2c)(c + 2a) 5 222d
2ab+2be+2c7~ a ”
Three-variable inequalities
or equivalently,
A(ab? + bc? + ca” — abc) +4b7c + 1labe > 0.
This is true since, by the AM-GM Inequality,
ab? + be? +ca® > 3abe.
Remark. This inequality is stronger than Belarus 1998, which states that
(a-c?
a
b b?+ab+be+ca™
bic
+a4- 2334+
bic'a
Problem 2.33. Let a, b,c be positive real numbers such that abe = 1. Prove that
81(a? +1)(b? + 1)(c? +1) <8(a+b+c)*.
(Pham Kim Hung)
First proof. Since
a+)
+ Vewa = Ve (Vas Ve),
we can write the inequality in the homogeneous form
81 (Var +¥V vet) (Vor Vera?) (e+ V0?) <8(a+b+e)*.
Since the constraint abe = 1 became superfluous, we can now assume that
a+b+c=3. Then, we may write our inequality as
(Var+ Ve) ( bet
By the AM-GM Inequality, it suffices to show that
x (Vai+ Vee) <6.
Applying the AM-GM Inequality again, we have
D (ves Vee) <> (Se)
_ (Se) +2a+3
3
This is what we want to prove. Note that equality holds if and only if a =6 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Second proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that c = minfa, b, ¢},
and hence ab > 1 > c > 0. Using the AM-GM Inequality, we have
(a? + 1)(b? +1) = (a? + abe)(b? + abc) = abla + be)(b +ca)
< zoote +be+b+ca)*= aC +b) (e417.
‘Thus, it suffices to prove that
gg | arbre * by ae
aap | Z8tabee? +e +,
or equivalently,
2
c
a+b
2
32 («++ +2) > 8lab(c? +1)(c +1)
Since ab > 1>c > 0, it follows that
atet oS -avab- = (va- vo)" [:-
In addition, the AM-GM Inequality gives
| 20.
2Vab(a +b)
1 2 A 2
@+1=s 241s Fy
From these two inequalities, we see that it is enough to check the following
inequality
2 2 (c2 +3)? 2
32( 2Vab+ +2c}) >8lab-———— -(c +1)”.
(avai sp) eetar 28 tery
‘Taking square root of each side, this can be written as
2
4v3( 2Vab+ —— 4. 2¢ ) > 2 fable? +3 + D,
( a aan t* zy pyvae Me
or equivalently,
8 (400 +4cVab+ a) > 9ab(c? + 3)c+ 1).
i, 1
Setting t = Vab > 1, we have c = =, and the last inequality becomes
v
4 1 1 \ 1 \
o(ar+ts >or? (+3 (a+1)-
t ¢ oe eh
Three-variable inequalities
Since t > 1, we get
41 1 1 s+ 15t?+3¢+1)(t-1)%
8(4+-+— }-9 | >+3){ 541 = GEIS SET UET WY 9,
tet e t
and the proof is completed. Note that equality holds if and only if a = b
L
Problem 2.34. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers satisfying a+b +¢
Prove that
(a? +ab+b?)(b? + be +e7)(c? +ca +a?) <3.
(Murray Klamkin)
Proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that a = max{a, b, c}. For
b =c =0, the inequality is trivial, and so it suffices to consider that b +c > 0
In this case, we may write our inequality as E(a, 6, c) <0, where
3
E(a, b, c)=(a? +ab + b*)(a? +.ac +c?) - = ——.,..
( =O mt b?+be +c?
We shall prove that
Ea, b, c)S E(a, b+c, 0) <0.
The left hand side inequality is equivalent to
(a?+ab+b?)(a?-+ac+c?)—a"[a?-+a(b+c)+(b+c)"] <
or
3be
be(ab + be +ea— a) < ——~___.
(b? + be +¢7)(b +c)?
Because be > 0, it suffices to prove that
(ab + be +ca—a")(b? + be +07)(b +c)? <3.
We have
(a+b+c? (aoe 8
3 L 3 ~
(at+tb+cP? 4
ab+be+ca-a?<
b+be+c? abV 202+ b2) +03 + seta? +b), 2a5 + 2b3 +.2c3 + babe > a3 +c3 +3b%(a +c) -+2abe + a
or equivalently, or equivalently,
20° +265 — 2ab/2(a? + b2) > 3c(a — by? . ent? de)
a +03 +269 + dabe > 36% +c) +———.
We have b
2a° + 2b? - 2ab (a? +b?) = After some simple computations, we can rewrite this inequality as
2 a? +b? > 24. gd
= 2(a° +69) —(a + b)(a? + b2) + 5 [Cat 6) V2(a2 + 6%) - 4a] (a b)(b-c) (= = ~ab+a+0) >0,
b =
a? +b? ——_ 4
=(a+b\Xa-bP +4 . 23 by -
2 2 [e+ yas 4ab | which is true because (a — b)(b—c) > 0, and
Since (a+ b)(a~b)? = 2c(a—b)*, (a+b) /2(a2 + b2)—4ab > (a-+b)?—4ab = a +c?
a? +b?
(a—b)? >0, and 7 26 it follows that °
2 + b? 4
(a+bya-byr+ 4/5 5 [e+ bv20@? 05 ~4ab] > Bea ~ by,
as desired. Note that equality holds if
or b=Oandc=a,orc=Oanda
aw
abtatez — +a-2b20.
The proof is completed. a
Third proof. As in the previous proof, we see that it suffices to consider the
and only ifa=b =c, ora =O and b=c, inequality in the nontrivial case when two of a, b, c are nonzero. Without loss
b. o of generality, we may assume that a > b > c. Then, by the AM-GM Inequality,S 2ab(a+ b)+ blab)’,
ae coi
be (20? +e) < be [ores 2 =2be(b +c) + Aor
bte +e
S2be(b +c) +c(b—c),
2
cay 2(c* +a?) 2a9. Prove that
(Sn —1)(a? +a} +++ +42) > 5(ay +a, +++: + aq)”
5.22. Let a), a, ..., dy be positive real numbers belonging to the interval [a,
b]. Prove that
ay tate tan — (M ae
“G, ~\2 =
ny/Gay
a b
where M = 4/—+4/—.
b a
5.23. If a,, ap ..., a, ate positive real numbers, then
oye
eee218 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
5.2 Solutions
Problem 5.1. If ay, 2, ..., dy (n> 3) are positive real numbers, then
where a = ay and dyi1 = ay.
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
8 i, a ij
(Moldova 2007)
Proof. For every 1 1a, +32 3(a, +a, +++ +4,).
a iv
Therefore
a, q,
an+1+S—
Now, adding up the n inequalities for i
ity. Equality holds if and only if a, =a) =
ay tag+- +a,
3 2,
1
a
3
,m, we get the desired inequal-
=1. a
n-variable inequalities 219
Problem 5.3. If x}, x2, ..., X, are positive real numbers such that x} + x3-++++
x? =n, then
(Tran Tuan Anh)
Proof. For all i=1, 2, ..., n, we have
@- 1?
1 (x; - 1?
+—=24-0 Tt .
*t Xp txt tx
Xi xi
22+
Therefore
a
from which the desired inequality follows. Equality holds if and only if x; —
X= x, = 1 o
Problem 5.4. Let x, xp, ..., Xp be positive real numbers such that xX)+*-Xq=
1. Prove that
8 a
Dtd+xd2 sal Jats.
fa =I
(Arkady Alt)
a’+1_a+1
7
Using this result, as well as the AM-GM
Proof. By the Power Mean Inequality, for any a > 0 we have }
(a+1)"
Qe
which is equivalent to a" +1 >220 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
| Inequality and the given condition x4, = 1, we obtain
Dd+xd= ote tt Dot tag] [at
S =| f a ist
a i lo
=) xptn= 7 +1) >—— "
x T4n= Dor +> 5 Die +1)
27] []oi+ay = ral fe +x).
This is what we want to prove, and so our proof is completed, Note that equality
holds if and only if x, =x =-+-= x, =1. o
Problem 5.5. Prove that, for all real numbers ay, a3, -.., a, €[1, 2], we have
“3
a; + 20:41
where the subscripts are taken modulo n.
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. Rewrite the inequality as
x i= A441
AG Fa. Ma + 2anp = °
Denote the left hand side of this inequality by L. Then, since x
a
GjQjny
we have
(4: — ai41)
ina; + 2a;41)
G = 41 P2ai41 ~ a;)
SF iGi41 (a; + a4 (a; + 2a;41)
= Gist
Aging
Since 1 < a; < 2, we have 2a; ~ a; > 0 for all i=1, 2, ..., n. Hence, L > 0,
and equality holds if and only if all a; are equal. Qo
n-variable inequalities 221
Problem 5.6. Let a, a5...» dy be positive real numbers such that «343
Prove that
1 1 ai
+ pret ay
1+ f144n(n—Da, 145/14 4n(n—1)az 1+ f1+4n(n—- 1a,
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. We write the inequality as follows
2, ¥1+4n(n—1)aj-1
x
2 2n(n—-1),
=D 1
u ET Ss Stns mr
By squaring, the inequality becomes
1 | 4n(n—1)] | 1 | 4n(n—-1)
[+8] [5 | 2280—o+ ys
Y a yj ij istejen UY
isi 2a.
Prove that
(Sn = 1)(a} +a} +++: +02) > 5S(ay tay +++ $4,)
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. Let a; = kay, k = 2. By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
3 k+ Lay +43 +++++a_]?
@iadde bata Ql 4 tial dal gp. f ges Met Dae tart tan)?
Gta i pas x
(k+1)?
‘er tt?
_ (tay te tay)?
-Ope tay
mate?
Therefore, it suffices to show that
Sn- 2k
= tn-1
Sei."
‘This inequality is equivalent to (k — 2)(2k — 1) > 0, which is obviously true for
3a, +a. +a,)"
k > 2. Equality holds if and only if Sa} +02 +----+a2 = Sess ay
24n-
6a3 _
that is, if and only if ay = 2ay = =
Problem 5.22. Let a1, az, ..., a, be positive real numbers belonging to the interval
[a, b]. Prove that
ay+ag+ M\2-=
zy
ns/@ay
[a 6
i
where M =
(Vasile Cirtoaje)238 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Proof. By Lemma below, it suffices to prove the desired inequality for a, = a2 =
= ay =a and y44 = Ogyy = ++ =a, = b, where k € {1, 2, ...,n—1}. The
inequality becomes
atb\2 2 na pit kat (n= Wb
; ate —.
k-1
n
k-1 ka+(n—k)b
— id ¢ = ———
patqb+e
p+q+1
Setting p = , We see that p 2 0,
1s P P
n
2
q20,ptq=1- i anda+b= . Therefore, we can rewrite the
inequality in the form
+qb+c\Ptatt
ao zaPbtc,
ptaq+l
which immediately follows by the weighted AM-GM Inequality. Thus, the proof
is completed. For n = 2, equality holds when a; = a and a = b.
Lemma. Let a), az, ..., dy be positive real numbers belonging to the interval [a,
b). The expression
is maximal when aj, dy, ..., dn € {a, b}.
Proof, For the sake of contradiction, assume that E is maximal when one of a1,
dy, ..., @y is different from a and b. Consider a < a; < b, and let
_ ay tagte tay
Fla) =" :
From hypothesis, we have f(a,) > f(a) and f (a,) > f(b). Since f(a,) 2 f(a)
is equivalent to
a
(vq - Ya) (F- a2 ~+++—a,) 20,
where
F = yams [( ya)" (vai)? (a) +--+ (va) ],
we get
Fa, tetany.
Similarly, from f (a;) = f(b), we get
ag +++ +a,26,
where
-
6 = Vbay | (ym) "2+ (ym)"™ (Vo) ++ (Ve) |:
It follows that F > G, which is clearly false. Thus, Lemma is proved. oa
n-variable inequalities 239
Problem 5.23. If a1, a... dy are positive real numbers, then
” (ne?
} (32) sear
at S aa;
isiab+be+ca,
which is a well-known inequality. Equality holds if and only if a = b =
Problem 2.8. Let a, b,c be nonnegative real numbers such that
(a+ b)(b +ele+a)=2.
Prove that
(a? + be)(b? + ca)(c? +ab) <1.
(Wasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that a > b > c. Then, we
have
4(a? + be)(b? + ca)(c? +ab) < 4(a? +.ac)(b? +ca)(be + ab)
= 4ab(b? + ca)(atc}?
<(b? +ca+ab)(a+c)?
<(b? +ca+ab+ be(a+c)?*
(a+ bP(b+e)*(a +c)
From this inequality, the conclusion follows immediately. Equality holds if and
only if (a, b, c) equals (1, 1, 0), or (0, 1, 1), or (1, 0, 1). a
Problem 2.9. Let a, b,c be nonnegative real numbers such that
a+b? +c? =a+bte
Prove that
a?b? + bc? +.c2a? < ab + be +a,
(Wasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. By squaring, from the hypothesis condition, we get
2 2
at+bt4ct— = 2(ab + be +a — ab? — b°c? — ca).
Therefore, the required inequality is equivalent to
at+bttct za? +b te?
This is true, since its homogeneous form,
(a+b+c)(a4 + bt +e4) > (a? +b? +07),
follows immediately from Hélder’s Inequality. Equality occurs for (a, b, ¢) =
(1, 1, 1), for (a, b, ¢) = (@, 0, 0), for (a, b, c) = (0, 1, 1) or any cyclic
permutation, and also for (a, b, c)=(1, 0, 0) or any cyclic permutation.Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Problem 2.10. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
ae
mu ato *
Applying the AM-GM Inequality, we have
b(a+b)+e(e +a) b(a +b)
a= 3) a(b+c) x -
peta pyran a
DuneEE) aera = Re
Thus, the proof is completed. Note that equality holds if and only if a = b
c.
Problem 2.11. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
2(ab + be +ca +1)*
(a+b) +e +a)"
(Tran Quoc Anh)
Proof. Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
1 4
(arbres a) (ab44+be-+e0" babe) > (ab-+ boca 1
1
(arbrer J tact +ba*+cb? +abe)>(ca+ab+be+1
Tt follows that
(ab+be+ca+1)?*
= ab? + be + ca Fabe’
» lab be+eat 1?
a?b+b?c-+c2a-+abc
Three-variable inequalities 51
Adding these two inequalities, we get
1
a(ars+e + =) = (ab+bet+ca+1)?
abe
zt
Diab? +abe
4(ab + be +ca +1)?
(a+b\b+ceeo+a
1
Mab +abe
. 4{ab+betca+1y?
© Sa?b + abe + Dab? +abc
Dividing each side by 2, the conclusion follows. Equality holds if and only if
1.
a=b
Problem 2.12. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that
be
a+b+c
ps ear
2a+b
4
ile Cirtoaje)
Proof. Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
be be 1 1 1
ee 1 +
ae Lqentera =e =)
1 be be 1 ca
-{(Sasth =a) vss Us)
1 cat+b) at+tbt+e
au atb 40
Equality holds for a = b =c, and fora = O and b=c, b=Oandc=a,c=0
and a=b Qo
Problem 2.13. Let a, b, ¢ be positive real numbers satisfying a+ b-+c = 3. Prove
that
B+” aby 2
Proof. From the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
1
PY
9 _ (a+b+eP < a? ‘ b? ee
4a2 +b? +c2 a2 +(a? +b2)+(a2 +02) ~ 2a? a? +b? a? +c?
Therefore,
be
+ (= mt
from which the desired result follows. Note that equality holds if and only if
a=b 1. o52 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh Three-variable inequalities -
Problem 2.14. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers such that The first inequality can be written as
Prove that
2 a
:
Lasers
ste bya Do.
a? +2be ~
Under the assumption that a > b > c, it suffices to prove that
be | ca, ab
a?+1 b?41 C241
a? + 2be
(Pham Kim Hung)
Proof. We apply first the AM-GM Inequality and then the Cauchy-Schwarz In-
equality to get
be (b+c)* (b+c)*
Pal 4+) Mer) +@+2)]
a*(a— bya —c)
a? + 2be
2(b — e)(b —
B(b- b= a) ,
b?4+2ca
Similarly, we have
ca 1 (_ 2 @ e af @ which is equivalent to the obvious inequality
P41 4 e+e ate)’ &+1~4\ e+e
(a — b)?[a2b? + 2a°c + 2c(b — ca? + ab + b?)] 20.
Adding up these three inequalities gives us the desired result. It is easy to see rhe eeenad inequality: equivilenten
that equality holds if and only ifa = b =c a
a atabtee -
he)
ab+be+ca a+2b~
Problem 2.15. Let a, b, ¢ be positive real numbers. Prove that Applying again the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we get
Po pR ee 2 2
a +b? +c @ b (b+c+a)*
hacen areeemnare: b
: _* eter
Paheaarad Liaame 2 Kara) +b p20) Fale
(Tran Quoc Anh)
> HH >
ab+be+ca~ a+abt+be b? +be+ca
Thus, it is enough to prove that
Proof. Using the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
a? +b? +0? 2(a+b+c)
2 2 4 ee
ab+be+ca" 2(a?+b? +c?) +(ab+be+ca)
@ 2a? a @
= <
Faabtbe ~ G+ abe) + (a+ ab) ~ Da? + abc) | Aa?+2ab)
. . a ‘ which is equivalent to the obvious inequality
Using this inequality and the two similar ones, it suffices to prove that a quality
2 3 (a? +b? +c? — ab — be - ca)(2a? + 2b? + 2c? — ab — be — ca) 2 0.
= +>
x 2 + 2be Lage
2(a? + b? +c?)
ab+be+ca
The proof is completed. Equality holds for a =
Moreover, it suffices to prove that
2
a? +b? +c? yr @
ab+be+ca a?+2bc’ Problem 2.16. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers such that ab+be+ca =3.
Prove that
1 it 1
a?+2 0 b?+2
a 2
ch 42
24. p24 (2
a+b +c Tr a
ab+be+ca a+2bVasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can
Proof. The desired inequality can be written as
G 1 : 1 1 ' 1 1
2 a?+2 2 +2)” x aa)
| or equivalently,
a + ef + ; 1
i >is
a?4+2° b?4+2 0° c24+27~
This is true since by the Cauchy-Schwarz, Inequality, we have
ee 2 (at+b+c?
@+2 b+2 +2 (a2 +2) +(b? +2) +(e +2)
(a+b+cyP
1, 1).
Problem 2.17. Let a, b, ¢ be positive real numbers. Prove that
@-be | bemca -ab
4a? 44b2 402 | 4b? 442402 | 4c2 4402 +P
Proof. Since
4(@?—be) (2b +e)
4a? +4b? +02 402+ 4b? +c?’
we can write the inequality in the form
(b+ (2¢-+a)? (2a+ by?
| 4a? +4b2 +c? © 4b?4+ 4c? +07 4c2+ 4a? +b? ~
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
- Tran Quoc Anh
(2b+¢)2 (2b +c? 2b2
| aa tab +e 2a? +20) +2420) ~ +2 A
and, similarly,
(2e+a)* 2c? a
Bo 4 a? = B22 * POD?
@a+bP 2a? be?
4c? +4a? +b? ~ c?+2a? b?+2c%
“(+b +e) 4 2ab + beta)
The proof is completed. It is easy to see that equality holds when (a, b, ¢) =
ao
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
+
Three-variable inequalities 55
‘Adding these inequalities, the desired inequality follows. Equality occurs if and
only if : ,
a(b? +2c?) = b(c? + 2a”) = c(a? + 2b?).
It is easy to show that these conditions are equivalent to a = b = c, or da =
2b =c, or 4b = 2c =a, or 4c = 2a=b. Oo
Remark 1. Using the identities associated to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities
above, we have
5 (2b+cP
4024 4b? +2
2 2(a? — be)?(2b —c}*
2b? ¢
= lz $abe Fa ea® PFI + 2a \(4a? + 402 +
325 (a= be}*(2b=eF_
(a? + 2b?)(c? + 2a)(4a? + 4b? +c?
and
(a? = bc)*(2b — )?
a —be yr
(a? + 2b?)(c? + 2a2)(4a? + 4b? +c?)
Ligeaee
Thus, the original inequality is equivalent to
(b? + 2c2)(a? — be)?(2b — c)?
yee
4a? + 4b? +c? ~
Remark 2. Similarly, we can prove that
a*—be b? -ca 4 c?—ab So
2ka2 + kb? +c? " 2kb?+k2c2 +a? © 2ke? + k2a*+ b? ~
for any positive real number k. Indeed, this inequality is equivalently to
ys (kb +c)? a
2ka? + kb? +c? ~~”
and, by the Cauchy-Schwarz, Inequality,
Ee (kb +c}? zy (kb +c)?
2ka? + k*b? +c! k(a? + kb?) + (c? + ka”)
kb? 2
ab(a? + b*) + be(b? +c?) + calc? +42),
and thus, in terms of q, we get
abe > =A ~a)
6
Therefore,
+4abe — ab — be -ca= + q+ 4abe
T6(ab + be +ca) 16q
> 44 2(4q- 0-0)
= 164 qd 3 q @
eae
_ G=8a)0~40?
48q -
Equality holds if and only if a= b =0or any cyclic permutation. 0
2
Remark. Actually, the slighly more general inequality
{apna 2 1
aVEP +E + VK +a eV Bat 4 bP < max | VE t1 R+T
3 4
holds for all positive reals a, b, ¢ satisfying the condition a+b +c = 1. However,
the proof is quite similar to the above one we presented. We shall leave it as an
exercise for the readers.
Problem 2.43. Let a, b, ¢ be nonnegative real numbers satisfying a+ b-+¢ =
Prove that
1
oe
ab +8” be +8 cal +8
>
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
Three-variable inequalities 87
Proof. Expanding and combining like terms, the inequality turns into
64> 13 +(16-SrJA+5r(A+B),
where
r=abe, A=ab?+be?+ca®, B=a"b+b’c+c7a.
From AM-GM inequality, we get r < 1. Also, by Schur’s Inequality
(a+b+c)? > 3abe + 4ab(a + b) + 4be(b +0) + 4eale+a),
we get
3099-1)
A+B
0,A<4-randA+B<
39 —
ets , it suffices to show that
5r(o—
64> Pe a6—sya—n+ Oo
This inequality is equivalent to
r(r—1)(4r +9) $0,
which is clearly true. Equality occurs for (a, b, c) = (1, 1, 1), and also for
(a, b, c)=(0, 1, 2) or any cyclic permutation thereof. a
Remark. We can prove the inequality ab? + be? + ca? + abe < 4 using the
rearrangement inequality, Let (x, y, z) be a permutation of (a, b, c) such that
x2 y >z, Since xy > zx > yz, by the rearrangement inequality, we have
ab? + be? +ca? =b-ab+e-be+a-casx-xy+y-2xtz-yz
= y(x +2) —xyz=y(x +2)? —abe.
Consequently, it suffices to show that
Warts? <4,
which follows immediately by the AM-GM Inequality
priest ctessi
2y(x+z)P < [ z88 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoe Anh ‘Three-variable inequalities 89
Problem 2.44. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that Second proof. The case (a + b)(b + ¢)(¢ + a) = 0 is trivial, so let us condider
j _ now that (a + b)(b +c)(c +a) > 0. Due to symmetry, we may assume that
a? +b? +c3 + Babe > aby 2a? + b) + be 2b? +2) + caV/2 +a). a> b>c, From the AM-GM Inequality, we have
(Nguyen Anh Cuong, MOSP 2004) 2abV2(a? + b?) < aa? + b*) + 2ab?,
First proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that c= min{a, b, ¢}
Then, by the AM-GM Inequality, we have
: 2b? 4 bee? oa? eo® ec?
bVAP+A +aVAera < eee eet £
2
2bey 2(b? +c?) < c(b? +c?) + 2cb?,
ED Cale? +a?
2eay 2(c? +a?) < —, it becomes as follows
abe
BP +c cb +a*—b* a+b? <8
yz | —~—— +2 | tex | ———— +2 ] +xy | ———— +2] <0,
be ca ab
2yzcosA+ 2zx cosB + 2xy cosC + Axy +yz+2x) <0,
x? +y" +2? — 2yzcosA— 2zx cosB — 2xy cosC > 0,
(x — y cos ~zcosB)’ +(y sinc —zsinB)? > 0.
The last inequality is obviously true. Equality occurs if and only if x + y +
= ¥
2
Sind = dab = gags thats ifand only ifx = y =z =0 Q
Second proof. Substituting x = —y — 2, the desired inequality becomes as fol-
lows
a(y +2)b(c +a-b)+y(y +2)c(a +b —c) > yza(b +e—a),
¥7c(a + b—c)+2"b(e+a—b) > yz[a(b+e—a)—cla+b—c)— b(e+a—b)],
y*c(a+ bc) +2*b(c +a—b) > —yz(c +a—b)a+b—c).
Since —yz(c +a— b)(a+b—c) < |yz|(c +a — b)(a+b—c) and
yrcla+ b—c)+2*b(c +a—b) > 2lyz|be(c +a — ba +b—c),
it suffices to prove that
Abe > (c +a-b)(a+b—c).
This inequality is equivalent to
(b+c—a)(b+c+a)>0,
which is obviously true. The proof is completed o
Remark. For x
-c,y=b-aandz
b, we get the known inequality
7h? + bc? +070? Sab + b8e+C8a.
Panat i210 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Problem 4.23. Let a, b, ¢ be the side-lengths of a triangle. If x, y, z are real
numbers, then
(ya? +2b? + xc?)(za? + xb? + ye?) > (xy + yz +2x)(a2b? + b?c? + ¢7a),
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. We write the inequality as follows
Ye? > yza?(b? +c? —a”) +2xb"(c? +a? — b*) + xyc*(a? + b? —c?),
zx(c?+a?—b?) __ xy(a?+b?—c?)
y2(b? +c? — a?
Pa? ab?
2yzcosA 2excosB 2xycosC
Beer oa eb
* z 2 2
G -Xeosc- Fcoss) f. (Fsinc ~Esinz) =o
a8 ¢ b ¢
Since the ls nequllry ig leary tre, the proofs completed. Equality occu
if and only ce a
1
= and = =, we get again the well-known inequality
ve
Remark 1. For x = 5
Bb +b8c+c8a > ab? + b7c? +070?
i i,
Remark 2. For x=, y = = and = 55, we obtain the elegant asymmetric
inequality of Walker (Math. whe. 43, iy
2 2
a(S+ s+ S) esse)
¢
Problem 4.24. Let a, b, c and x, y, be positive real numbers such that
(atb+clxt+y+z)=(a? +b? +07)(x? +y? +27) = 4.
Prove that
1
bi <=
abexyz <
(Vasile Cirtoaje, Mircea Lascu)
Five and six-variable inequalities 211
Proof. Using the given relations and the AM-GM Inequality, we have
A(ab + be+ca)(xy + yz+2zx)=
=[(atb+cP—(a? +b? +0) [(x+y +2? -(CP+y? +27)]
=20—(atb+ cP ty? +2%)—(xty +2? +b? +07)
S20-2atbtelxty+z)V (a+b? +c2)(x2 + y2 +22) =4,
and hence
(ab + be +ca)(xy + yz+2x) <1.
On the other hand, multiplying the well-known inequalities
(ab+be+ca)? > 3abc(a+b+c),
and
(xy + yz +2x) > 3xy2(x+y +2),
we get
(ab + be +ca}*(xy + yz +2x)* > 36abexyz.
Therefore, we get
12 (ab+be +ca)*(xy + yz +2x)* > 36xyz,
1
which implies abexys < 32. To have equality, its necessary to have (ab-+ be +
ca)? = 3abc(a + b +c) and (xy + yz + 2x)? = 3xyz(x + y +2). But these
relations imply a = b = c and x = y =z, which contradict the hypothesis
(a+b+elxtytz)=(a? +b? +07)(x? +y? +27
1
Consequently, we have abexya < 3.
Problem 4.25. If x1, Xp,.+.,X6€[0, 1], then
xf x
x8 +8438 + x8 42845 tah txh+xd+xb+5
(Ukraine 1999)212 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Proof. We have
xh tah tohtadtaf+52 x8 tah tah toh + bt t 4.
Using this and its analogous inequalities, it suffices to show that
Since
6 6 i
3 (oe ¥) = axe +2)25>)7x?,
a fi
the conclusion follows. Equality holds if and only if all x; are equalto1.
Chapter 5
n-variable inequalities
“Tris not enough to have a good mind, the main thing és to use it well.”
Rene Descartes
5.1 Statements
5.1. If ay, aa, ..., dy (n 2 3) are positive real numbers, then
4; n
——_- <3,
1+ 2a; +i, 4
where ag =
5.2. Let ay, a2, -.., 4, € [0, 1] and S =a? +a} +--+: +a. Prove that
a ay a, 1
—— + 9 +. cs
Qn+1+S$—as In+1+S—a} 2n+1+S-a:
5.3. If x), Xg, ++ Xp ate positive real numbers such that x2+.x} +--+
then
1/< 1
i(Bae Ez} ee
213214 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
5.4. Let x, Xp, ..., X, be positive real numbers such that x, x2 = 1. Prove
that a
n
Sxra4x= = []a+x.
i=
5.5. Prove that, for all real numbers aj, @,..., 4, €[1, 2], we have
x 3
Gai + ais
where the subscripts are taken modulo n.
5.6. Let a), da, ..., a, be positive real numbers such that a;a---a, = 1. Prove
that
1 1 1
+ she
1+ Y1+4n(n=Da, 1+ f1+4n(n= Day 1+ Y1+4n(n- 1a,
5.7. Let a), dg, ..., a, be positive real numbers. Prove that
@ (ay tay +++ + aq)”
“ (aj +143 +1)---(a2 +1)
ry a, tay te tay
(a2 + 1a} +1) (2 +1)
5.8. Let x1, xp, ..., Xq be positive real numbers such that xy +.) +--++%p
Prove that
n
2
=n)
5.9. Let a, 2, ..., dy be positive real numbers such that a,43-+-a,, = 1. Prove
| that
| - 1 1 1 ajtate-+a,+n
+ Speed aA
Hi T+q, 1+a) +a, 4
n-variable inequalities 215
5.10. Let n > 2 be a fixed integer. Find the least constant C such that the
inequality
DY xxi? +37) $ Clr ty t+ x,)*
astsjen
holds for every x1, ..., x, 2 0. For this constant C, when does equality hold?
5.11, Let n be a positive integer and let x, < xp <+++
3abe. Therefore,
4—27q(1 —2q + 3abc) = 4- 27q(1 — 29 +q*) =(4-3q)(1 - 34)? = 0,
which proves our inequality, Note that equality holds if and only if a = b =
c. Oo
Problem 6.7. Prove that for any positive real numbers a, b, c, the following in-
equality holds
(a? — be) Va? + 4be + (b? — ca) Vb? +.4ca + (c? — ab) Vc? + 4ab > 0.
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
ee258 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Proof. Without loss of generality, assume that a > b > c. We have
(=) (o5-)- NE
and
Va3 +4abe > V b3 + 4abe.
Since
— be) Va? + 4be + (b? — ca) Vb? + 4ca =
) Va +4abe + (° b -=) V8 +4abe,
vb
we can apply Chebyshev’s Inequality to get
(a? — bc) Va? +.4bc + (b? — ca) Vb? +.4ca >
be ca
(avarnve-% =) (Va 4abe + V0? +4abe
(aya+bvb) (Vab—c) ( 3 +4abc + Vb? + 4abc)
2Vab
Since aVa+bvb > 2VabVab, Vab—c =O and Va? +4abe+ Vb? +4abe >
2VabVab + 4cVab, it follows that
(a?— be) Va? + 4b +(b2—ca) VB? +4ca > 2V/ab ( Vab—c) Vab+acVab,
and hence, it is enough to check the following inequality
avab (Vasc) yab+4cVab + (c?- ab) Vc? +4ab > 0,
which is equivalent to
(vab-e) [avo +4abe ab — (c+ Vab) Vera >0.
This is true because
4 («8 +4abeVab) 7 (< + vee) (e +4ab) =
=c (Vab ~c) (2ab + 2¢Vab +e? Jee
Our proof is completed. Note that equality holds if and only if a=
More difficult inequalities 259
Problem 6.8. Prove that if x, y, 2 are positive real numbers, then
F z
Sy -322/ Ny -3).
2x ytz
1
y= and Y=
[arbi re" 2b4c4
DY oe 3242) abr *|"
or equivalently,
Ya Vea WEY ER —9(2- vA are
bite
For any positive real numbers m, n, we have
(Vasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. Setting the inequality becomes
Ss
23459 LR 2 =
Vm@an_™ +2(V2-1)mn+n _2(2 A) (mn- Vn ve)
mtn m+n
_ 2(2-Vv2)mn 2mn
m+n m+n+ ym? +n?
2(2- v2) mn 2mn
a aS 7)
m+n 7
mtn+
v2
=0.
According to this inequality, we obtain
x sores re Let 42 (Y=) whe te!)
bP +c?
= D1 2c*(b? +c) - 2 (2- v2) abc?
On the other hand, the AM-GM Inequality gives us
22>)
Thus, we only need to prove that
7e7(b?-+c)-2 (2- V2) abc?)
b? +c
b*c*
Vote
Pre 22>) b%c9—3 (2 - v2) a?b%e?,260 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
which is equivalent to
2
2.27.2 Pi: 3.3 ‘pei 2 R262 @
Did?e2(b? +2) 29 b%c? > (2- v2) a?b?e (Sate
Because | bc?(b? +c?) 2) b%c3 = )b%e(b —c)* and
s @ yee (b? 02)? x (a? +b? +02)(b? 2)?
b? +c? (a? + b?)(a? + c2) (a? + b7)(b? +c? )(c? +a?)
it is sufficient to check that
Sqb?c*(b —c)? + S,c7a?(c — a)? +S.ab*(a — b)? > 0,
where
(2— v2) a2(a? +b? +.07)(b +e
(a? + B2)(b? + c2)(c? +a)
and $), S, are similar, Without loss of generality, we may assume that a > b >.
Then, it is easy to check that S, < S,
= it suffices to prove that
iF
+b? +c*)laX(b+cP+b%(c+a)?] _
PO EFI ENE +a) z
Applying the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have (b+¢)? < 2 (0 (+ +3¢ 2) and
3
(atcP< 3 3(« + 3°) . Therefore
5(a? + b? +c?) [# (+ 3.2) +52 (a24 32
gg A Nh)
~ 3(a? + b?)(b? + c7)(c2 + a?)
_ 10 Sc? [(a? — 6?) +c*(a? + b?)]
3 6a? + BAG FCA +02) ~ 3
From S, +5, > 0 and S, > Sz, we have S, > Sy > 0. Using this and the obvious
inequality a2c*(a ~c)? > b*c?(b —c)?, we get
Yis.07e2(b-c)? > 54b2c*(b—cP°+8yc2a%(c—a}? = (S, +5, )b2c2(b—c)? = 0,
as desired. Note that equality holds if and only if x = a
More difficult inequalities 261
Problem 6.9. Prove that if a, b, ¢ are positive real numbers such that abc = 1,
et 1 1 1 1 14
+ + = + + a
T+bt+e *Iteta1T+atb~ 24a 246 246
(Bulgaria 1997)
First proof. From
2 b 1 a(b 1)?
a+2 ab+b+1 a+b+1 = @saab+b+ arb”
1 b 1
2igea Daeaei* Uae
b
since 7 Spa bai 7 b this inequality yields
1 1 1
ate aS | SS
ae Dares? Dare
and thus, it suffices to prove that
1 1 1
12 be hay
-at2 b+2 ct2
or equivalently,
flay ss
a+2° b+2°>c+2~ ~
By the AM-GM Inequality, we have
a @2l3 a3
a
a+2> at2abe}— a2/3 + 2(be)V3 ~ a2/3 + BAF
Adding this and the two analogous inequalities, we get the desired result. It is
easy to see that equality holds if and only ifa=b =¢=1 o
Second proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that a > b > c, From
the hypothesis abc = 1, we have a > 1. Now, we write the inequality as
1 1) (2 1 i, 1
c+2 atb+l b+2 atc+1) at2~ btc+1
or equivalently,
1
b+c4+1"
a+b-c-1 . atc—b-1
(c+2)a+b+1) (b+2)ate+1)
Iv
4
2262 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Since a2 6 2c anda>1,wehavea+b—c—1>a+c—b—1, and
1 1 2 (a~-1)b~0) Oe
(c+2)a+b+1) (b+2)a+e+1) FAct2H@+b+iNates] =?)
From this, applying Chebyshev’s Inequality together with the Cauchy-Schwarz
Inequality, we get
at+b-c-1 atc—b-1
(c+2)a+b+1) (b+2)ate+1)~
1 1
= (a-1) | ———___,____4
=a fem (b eexsau|
5 4(a-1)
* (c+ 2Ma+b+1)+(b+2\ate+1)
: 4(a-1)
© (a+3\b+e41)+3a42be+1
Thus, it suffices to prove that
Aa 1)(b+e+1)
(a+3)(b+e+41)+3a+2be+1
or equivalently,
4(a-1) btetl
3a+2b =
a+34 c+] a+2
b+e41
Since b+c +13 2Vbce+1 anda > 1, it is enough to show that
4(a-1) 4 2vbE+1 ,
3 =
ag 4 et 2be+T "a F2
2Vbe+1
. 1
Setting t = Vbe <1, then a = — and it becomes
1
4(5-1
(3 Jaren 2t+1
2
1 3 1
(ara)ens Sear at
> 1.
This can be written as
20-241) | e(2e4+1)
(28 FFE At GAG
i) i
More difficult inequalities 263
or
(1-02? +241)
241
(t+2)(c3 + e241)
Since 1 > t > 0, it is equivalent to
21 + fet 1(2e? +1) > (e+ 2 +02 + 122 +04 DY.
This is true because 2t?+12> 3+ t? +1, and
21 + e)(2e+ 1) -—(¢ +2)(2e? +e 41) = e(1 - t)(2t +3) >0.
The proof is completed a
Problem 6.10. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that
(atb+e) (44442) 594 ar?
ee OT OTT ETS 2arb+ oe
3 2
(Vo Quoc Ba Can)
Proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that a > b > c. Then, we
have two cases
Case I. a+c 2 2b, Since (ac)? = (a +c}? — 4ac and
1 :) (a+ b+oate) | a+btc
1
+b+e)(—+— —,
(a+b o(z+z+t ae D
we can write the inequality as
(a+b+cYa+c) 54ac ate. 27(a +c)?
ac (atb+eh” b * Xatbtae”
By the AM-GM Inequality, we have
(atb+eate) | S4ac > 6,/ Sat)
ac (a+b+c? ~ Va+b+c’
and then, it suffices to prove that
é CG CsLerw 27(a +c)?
atb+c b ~" * 2(a+b+c)?"
ate
Setting +7 2t (¢ 2 1), it becomes
3t 277
6 +t244——
2t+1 (2e+1)?264 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
3t 3t 6t
Since = —————— > ——, it is enough to check that
2+1 °° f3e(arz1) Stl
36 ayy 2707
ekg a
5St+1 ~ (2e+1)’
which is equivalent to
(2007 = 7t —4)le
(Se + 1)(2t +1)?
Because t > 1, we have 20t? — 7t — 4 > 0 and hence, the above inequality is
true,
Case 2. 2b > a +c. In this case, applying the AM-GM Inequality, we get
atbso(Z+542)-9=
“el +2) e405 = a -8
2a+o/( a+) +2 +0
°( 2(va~ ve)? _(a- oe) a= oF
ac vac ac Vac (fat fc)”
5 Ma=cF , a~c? 6(a—c)?
2 are? te? ate
On the other hand, it is clear that
27(a-c)* 2xa-cP —_6(a~c)*
Aatb+cr— ate 2 (ater
2(at—-te
Combining these results, the conclusion follows. Equality holds if and only if
a=b=c. ao
Problem 6.11. Let a, b,c be nonnegative real numbers, no two of which are zero.
Prove that
1 1 1 1
—— + + Ss 2
(a+2b)? © (b+2c)? © (c+2a)? ~ ab+be+ca
(Pham Kim Hung)
More difficult inequalities 265
First proof. ‘To prove this hard inequality, we need to consider the following
two cases
Case 1. 4(ab+be+ca) > a?+b? +c. In this case, applying the Cauchy-Schwarz
Inequality, we get
9(S9)"
x (a+2b)? ~ di@+20"a +2)?’
and henee, it suffices to prove that
9 (Xa)? (Sav) = Vat 26y%(a +207
Since Sa + 2b)%(a +20)? = (Xe)" +18 (Xav)’, this inequality can be
™“ 9 (Xa) (Sas) = (Xa)'+ 18 (Ma),
(Xe? Yad) (4 Diab - Yee’) zo
which is true according to the hypothesis 4(ab + be +ca) > a? +b? +c? and the
well-known inequality a? + b? +c? > ab+be+ca.
Case 2. a? +b?+c? > 4(ab+be+ca). Without loss of generality, we may assume
that a=max{a, b, c}. Since
or
a(a—2b— 2c) =a? +b? +c? —4(ab + be +ca) + b(a—b)+c(a—c)+4be > 0,
we get a > 2(b +c). Now, using the AM-GM Inequality, we have
1 1 2
aos too 2 oo’
(a+2b) ” (b+ 2c)? ~ (a +2b)(b + 2c)
and thus, we see that it is enough to prove that the stronger inequality holds
2 1
ee
(a+2b)(b+2c) ~ ab+be+ca’
or equivalently,
b(a— 2b — 2c)
(a+2b)\(b + 2c\ab + be tea) ="
Because a > 2(b +c), this is clearly true. The proof is completed. Note that
equality holds if and only ifa=b =c. a
RB266 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Second proof. Assume that a = max{a, b, c} and consider two cases
Case 1. a < 3b +c. Settinga+2b=x+y,b+2c=y+zande+2a=zt+x
yields
gen tbe. iy yal ttere og :
2 ° 2 ° 2 a
and
Sxoyt22 4, Symz+2x
9° 9?
Then, the inequality may be expressed as
1 1 1 27
— + SS + SS SS.
(e+yP? "te? "Gtx? > x24 y2 4224 (xy t+ yetzx)
Using the well-known Iran Inequality, along with the usual inequality x2 + y?-+
2? >xy +yz+2x, we get
roy ya, 9
(ety? (ytzP (@4+x)? 7 4xy t+ ys +sx)
27
—
x? + y? +224 11 (xy + yz +2x)
Case 2. a > 3b +c. Since c+ 2a < 3a < 3(2b +a), we have
1 1
—
(c+2a)*~ 9a+2b)*
Therefore, it suffices to show that
10 i 1
pa apnea a oliage ne
Oa+2b)? (b+2c)* ~ ab+be+ca
By the AM-GM Inequality, we get
woo, 2v10 2.1
—~ +> Fe SO oS
9a+2b)* (b+2c)? ~ 3(a+2b)(b+2c) ~ (a+2b)(b + 2c)
Thus, it is enough to prove that
2a s 1
(a+2b)(b+2c) ~ ab+be+ca’
that is, in succession,
2.1(ab + be +ca) 2 (a + 2b)(b + 2c),
More difficult inequalities 267
a(1.1b+0.1c) > 2b? + 1.9be
‘We have
a(1.1b + 0.1c) — 2b? - 1.9be > (3b + c)(1.1b + 0.1c) — 2b? — 2be
13b?—6be+c? _ 4b? +(3b—c)? |
~ 10 - 10
which completes the proof. a
Problem 6.12. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers, no two of which are zero.
Prove that
»[a2+be gan se 1
Vere Veta Vere" 72
(Vo Quoc Ba Can, Crux Mathematicorum)
Proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that a > b > c. Then, we will
consider two cases
Case 1. 4a2b? > (a? + b?)(a — b)’. We claim that
c+ab (a? +02)(b? +07)
a+b? at +b? +22”
This inequality is equivalent to
a2 +b? +2c?\? 5 tet y(bt +c?
a+b? (ab +2
or ;
2 +b? + 2
2c?
a+b? \ a+b?
a? +b? +2?
a+b?
44 | (a —b)?
= @btey
Because +12>2and (ab +c?)? > ab, it suffices to prove that
42 %Xa-by
ere abe
which is true according to the hypothesis 4a?b? > (a — b)*(a? +b).
Using the claim above, the original inequality holds if268 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
where x = a? +c? and y = {/b? +2. To prove this, applying the AM-GM
Inequality, we have
ey fp 1 2 2 4 aye
g++ a= (1- 5 5+% te eye
yt” xP ty! 272) \y? ° x? + ae xo+4 y6
1 xityé
2a(i-ae)+2 fr
292 2YBx2y? | xo 4H ys
1 es) (tty4)8
=2(1-—~ }+2{/—+
( mm) 16x3 y3(x® + y®)"
On the other hand, the Power Mean Inequality and the AM-GM Inequality gives
us that
1
Qty P= BOP +t 2 4x8y3 (x8 + 9),
Combining this with the above inequality, we get
2 33
| of ey 1 [4
St 4 2 2(1--— —=
Vattee ( wa)? 6?
as desired.
Case 2. (a? + ba —b)? > 4a*b*. In this case, we can find that a? > 8b, and
hence a? +? > =| 507422), Therefore,
4/9 2
[5+ =
s[eabe |» bP+ea sfaete2 fh? +2
be +2 c2+a? ~ V¥ p24 ae
Because {2+ +(e >2+ # we see that our inequality is proved if the
following inequality is valid
1
af_ab
a+b ¥6
For the sake i contradiction, assume that a > (3+2v2) b, Then, a? > 3367,
and hence a? +c? > 17(b? +c?). Thus
» de. a<(3+2V2)d.
z
af@+be 3/b?+ca_ g/a2+c2 4/2 +02
epee Iq = V T+
b+ eta’ B+ ere
Our proof is completed. Equality holds if and only if a = b and c = 0, or any
cyclic permutation. a
More difficult inequalities 269
Remark. In the same manner, we can prove that the following inequality is valid
for any nonnegative real numbers a, b, c,
+ «/[b? [2 +ab
a Be the ae ab 5
Bre Vere a+b?
Problem 6.13. Let a, b, ¢ be positive real numbers. Prove that
a Be 3
sooo tt ooo NV 2}
a? +7abe +b? 3 + Zabe + c3 8+ 7abe +09
(Nguyen Van Thach)
Proof. Multiplying each side of the original inequality by ‘a? + b? +c? + 7abc,
we can write it as
a’
32
= 3+ 7abe.
+B +7abe de ae
By applying Minkowski’s Inequality, we have
(Zve)'+ +(x =
Bue
a+ ——.—__ >
+b +7abe
and thus, it suffices to prove that
,
(26)'+ (SV aeptae) Demo
or equivalently,
2
a3
2 byab+ = YS OZ Zarb.
Darve (x @+b+7abe
Now, using the AM-GM Inequality and the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
= a2b? a fi ab ?
In addition, Hélder’s Inequality gives us that
(= ae (Se)2 (Ta)*,
J t——“i RBA270 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
a+b +7abe} ~ (Sa) (Se) (Stab) + 6abe Sa]
According to the well-known inequality 3xy2z(x + y +z) < (xy tyz+zx)’, we
have
(Ze) (Tat) ete Les (Le) (Tet) +2 (Tat)
-(S9)(E9)
and hence, it follows that
2 3
(Xe)
(x a8 aS
(Xe)
Combining (1) and (2), we see that it is enough to check that
ae)" (eo)
he Oey
Multiplying each side of this inequality by —"*?*" we get
RHE LY ab be bealt
Q)
= 7abe.
ab+be+ca _ 7abc(a+b+c)
(at+b+c}* ~ (ab+be+ca)?"
Because
7 Tabclatb+e) 7 ,aXb-c)?
3 (ab+bet+cay 6(ab+be+cay”
and
abt+be+ca 1 Yb-c)
(atb+cP 3 Oatbt+c)”’
the inequality becomes $,(b —¢)’ + $,(c — a)? + S,(a — b)? = 0, where
7a? 1
(ab+be+caP (a+b+c)?”
A) a,
More difficult inequalities 271
and S}, S, are similar. Due to symmetry, we may of course assume that a > b >
c, and then S, > S, = S,. On the other hand, we have
7(b* +c?) 1 > __(b+e? 1
(abt+be+ca? (atb+cP~ (abt+be+eaP (atb+c}?
_ bte 1 bee
“\ab+be+ca atbt+c) \abt+bet+ca at+b+e
be +be+c? bte
~ (ab+be+caya+b+c) \ab+bet+ca ' a+bt+e
Sy+5,
>0.
So, it is clear that S, 2 S, > 0. Now, because S,(b —c)* > 0 and S,(a —c)*
2 S,(a— b)*, we deduce that
Sa(b —c)? + Sy(c — a)? +S,(a — b)? = S,(a — b)? + S,(a — b)?
=(S,+S)a- bP 20,
as desired. This ends our proof. It is easy to see that equality holds if and only
ifa=
Problem 6.14. Let a, b, ¢ be positive real numbers such that abe = 1. Prove that,
for any k > 0, we have
be_ ca ab 3
O+k B+k +k k+l
(Wo Quoc Ba Can)
Proof. Since a, b, c > 0 and abc = 1, there exist some positive real numbers x,
v zr XY seas a
y, 5 such that a= 4/72, b= #/—, c= */>. Making these substitutions, the
xe y z
desired inequality becomes
yr x ead
Ga) 4 kx? + (ya 4] ~ KFT
Using the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
: .
[Scammer] Loomure ron] (Zs)
and thus, it suffices to prove that
ce Kip, ; > kCxyz)* P84 Soy.CO
272 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Gan - Tran Quoc Anh
Due to homogeneity, we may assume that x + y +% = 3. Then, the inequality
becomes
k(xyz)4 31x94 + Dixy 53k +.
Using the well-known inequality 3xyz(x +y +z) < (xy +yz+zx)*, we deduce
that
fag 4] BD RET
(xyz)4s ; 2
From this, applying the AM-GM Inequality, we get
oot Des Hoe) le)
2 (Sees)
a S42 +3)
2
81
IA
=3.
Furthermore, it is clear that
+yt2?
Combining these two inequalities, we get
Kecyz)/4 Sx + Yi xy sak +0), |
as desired. Equality holds if and only ifa =b=c=1 of
Remark. In the same manner, one can prove that the inequality
be ca ab 3 |
G4k Bak Hk RT |
holds for any positive real numbers a, b,c such that abe = 1 and for any positive |
real number k.
Problem 6.15. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers such that a+b +¢ =6.
Prove that
—4
b¢
= = 2 pasB sg
6=a+b+c=at2 +3 3 z
ab2c3
y <1
mae
Using this inequality and the AM-GM Inequality, we get
and hence, it follows that
a°b + b*c-+4ca*—Sabe+4>
abe?
23
=2 ab 6 ie 46 a \ abr Sab
~ 2 12 3 22.38 men
6 6 2
bc ca? ab?c3
=) (=) - | yas} — Sate
12 3 atog8
[abil
=30' ge
as desired. Note that equality holds if and only if a= 1, b= 2 andc=3,
2 a?b+b*c+4ca®—Sabe +4:
2b
>2-15%/2".
5abc = 0,
Next, we will prove the right hand side inequality. In order to prove it, we need
to consider two cases
‘The first case is when 3a” + Sac > be. In this case, we have b*c — Sabc < 3a*b,
and hence
ab + b?c +.4ca? — Sabe < a*b +3a7b + 4ca? = 4a*(b +c)
aoa
=i6- 2.2. (pace 6 grater
meng gS 3
3 ‘ be
The second case is when bc > 3a? + Sac. In this case, we have a2 < gt andCC es— 3
274 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
hence
b
a?b + bc +4ca? — Sabe = a2(b + 4c) + b2c — Sabe < S +4c) + be Sabe
be 4 1
SZlbtacj+bee= gbelb +c) < 3b +c)
< 1 +b+ch= . 7
syle tefas= 2 < 128.
So, in both cases, we always have
a?b + bc + 4ca? — Sabe < 128,
as desired. It is easy to see that equality holds if and only if a = 4, b = 0 and
Problem 6.16. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers satisfying ab? + be? +
ca? +abe= 44, Prove that
(Tran Quoc Anh)
Proof. The original inequality is equivalent to
(al + ot 4ct)"= St (an? + be? +ca? +abe)
7 4V4
Setting a= x3, b= y3 and c =23, it becomes
81 5 ,
(xty+z)t> ai (\ x48 + Vyte8 + Votn8 + xiv).
By applying the well-known inequality (see Remark from the proof of problem
2.43)
27
(x+y +2) > (xy? 4 yz? +2x? + xyz),
we get
27
(xty+e Oy? tye? tax? + xyelix ty +2)
= 2 [Mety? +94) 42272 P x] .
More difficult inequalities 275
Furthermore, from the AM-GM Inequality, we have
and
Therefore
3 3
BE ey Yaya Yxtyet,
xty? +xy3)+2xyz ) x > xtys+ xty tet.
Dixty? + xy?) +2xy2) aD y
Combining this with the above inequality, the conclusion follows. Equality holds
if and only if (x, y, 2) = (0, 1, 2/2), or any cyclic permutation. Oo
Problem 6.17. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers. Prove that for any k > 2, we
have
Dive? +kab +b? < 4a? +(3k +2) Pad.
(Michael Rozenberg)
Proof. By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
(SverKst) <[Tlorn] (Te)
=2(X9)(pe*),
and henee, it suffices to prove that
a +kab +b? 49 07 +(3k+2) > ab
ra eee
Since a? + kab + b? = (a+b)? + (k—2)ab and
Met + Gkt+2) ab =4 (Xa) +3(k-2) Drab,
this inequality can be written as
3(k-2) ab
2Yfetn+2K-aY <4 at y276 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Since k 2 2, it is true when
ab 3yiab
2 <=.
> atb™ die
Multiplying each side by a + b +, we may write this inequality as
ab(at+b+c)
2a S38
or equivalently,
1
2ab aes 4
abe ap Sate
Now, using the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we get
1 1f1 1
2abe ) —— <2 =(-+-]= is
Sage <2 Dg (G45) = Dee
‘This is what we want to prove. It is easy to see that equality holds if and only if
k=2,ora=b=c oO
Problem 6.18. Let x, y, z be positive real numbers such that xyz = 8. Prove that
Pe yw? A
pg
J +0634) VO3+D@+D VeF+DG+) 3
(APMO 2005)
First proof. By the AM-GM Inequality, we have
= 2
1 1
+1 Vat Det—x4l) &FDFGI—xF1) xP+2"
Using this result and the similar inequalities for y and z, we get
m x? y 4x?
VEEDGF+412) AO? +2)? +2)"
Therefore, it suffices to prove that
4x? 4
au (x? +2)(y?+2) 3"
rr
More difficult inequalities
or equivalently,
3x2? +2) > (x? +2)? + 2)? +2)
After expanding, we can write it as
Dix?y? +2) x72 72.
This is true, since by the AM-GM Inequality,
Sixty? 23 Vxtytet = 48, and 23x? 2 6 x2y22? = 24.
‘The proof is completed. Note that equality holds if and only if x = y
a
Second proof. We will use the following result.
Lemma. If a, b, ¢ are positive real numbers, then
(a? +b? 407)9 > 2c*(ab + be +ea)*.
eer
, we have
Proof Putting ¢= yf
a+b?
+c 2(a? + b?) = 1? + 2tc.
ab+be+cas
Thus, it is enough to prove that
(20? +0?)3 > 2c?(t? + 2tc),
which is true because
(20? +.c)3 — 2c?(¢? + 2tc}* =
= 06 —2c4e? — 8c5r9 + 10074 +88
> c& — 2c4t? — 20742(c? + 4?) + 10c7e* + Br®
= co 481? +2074 + 84°
oo 6 4y2 é 254 4,2
= (24+ 5 +805 -2ctt! = +2c?t4 — 2c4t? | > 0.
(S Zt et'— 20 Ja (G42 c )
‘Turning back to our problem, since xyz = 8 and x, y, z > 0, we see that there
2a 2c 2b
exist some positive real numbers a, b, ¢ such that x = —=, y = a
Using these substitutions, the desired inequality becomes
B a s
b(8a" + b3)(8c* + a3) ~ 3Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Now, using Hélder’s Inequality, we get
:
[= TT [Diteer+ aFx6e°+0%] (Lad) = (Yet) |
So it suffices to prove that
9(Le)" = (Mav) [Teea? + o%y(609 + «)).
Since S7(8a° + b3)(8c3 +43) = 8yia® +7351 05b3 < 9308 +72) 03°,
2 (Sav) (Mek+s are’),
it is enough to check that
Because )a?— "ab = XG — by, and
Det +800? — (Sa?) =8 Ya2b? 3 Y a2 (a2 +b?) — 602622
= Seas +be+ca)—3ab?](a — bY
< Ve (ab + be + cay(a—b)*,
it suffices to show that
Va- oy? 7 Ser(ab + be + cayia ~ bY
2) fab ee y
But this is true since from the above lemma, we have
20d es Ye)” ae ay
The proof is completed.
aye (Se ay
More difficult inequalities
Problem 6.19. Let a, b,c be nonnegative real numbers. Prove that
atbtc
a? +b? +07"
a,b |e
2a?+be | 2b?+ca © 2c? +ab
Wasile Cirtoaje)
First proof. Due to symmetry, we may assume that a > b > c. Multiplying by
a+b +c, the inequality becomes in succession as follows
soe) (at+b+c)?
2a*+be ~ a? +b? +c?’
(atb+cP a(a+bt+c)
es eee
Paha 2 1 2a2+be |’
23a wae) 2 (et rHr+ey ELMER 9
3a*-(b~c}?
ae b\(a-c)20,
9 VEO 5 a yv- exe TB
2a? + be
We see that it suffices to show that
arm
a%(a-b)la-<)
x 2a2+bo
c—b
Larne 2°
Since (c — a)(c — b) > 0, the first inequality is true if
b%(b—c)(b—a) .
2b? +ca
a(a—b)la-c)
2a? + be
Indeed,
a*(a — b)(a—c) b= c)b-a) , a(a-bYb-o) b*(b—c)(b—a)
2a? + be 2b°+ca 2a + be 2b? +ca
_ (a? = DY = bb =e)
~~ (2a? + be)(2b? +ea) =280 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
The second inequality is also true because
x e=b __em~b | (a@=b)t(b=e) ,_b~a
2a? + be 2a? + be 2b? + ca 2c? +ab
1 1 1 1
=0-0(sS-ae +0-0(sya- are)
_(a=b\b=c) (2a4+2b-c 2b+2-a
~~ 26? 4a Gar EES)
_ 2a = b)(b = cla = c)a? +b? +c? x ab~ be~ca).,
(2a? + be)(2b? + ca)(2c? + ab)
Equality holds for @ = b = c, and again for a = 0 and b =c, b= Oande =a,
c=Oanda=b. a
Second proof. On the assumption that ¢ = min{a, b, c}, we can get the desired
inequality by summing the following inequalities
@ b
4 2(a+b)
2a? +be 2b? +ca
(2a? + be) + (2? + cay’
and
2(a+ b) ¢ atb+e
2(a? + b?)+c(a+b) © 2c? tab ~ a? +b? +07"
Using the identity (x + y)(u+ v) — 2(xu+yv) =(y — x)(u—v), we get
(2a? + be) + (20? +a) eq) Meth
a
a+ be * BPE
_ 2 a 2 ie: a b
U(2b"+ en) — (2a +-be)] (= tbe 2b + =)
_ (a= bP a +2b ~e)(2ab ~ac~ be)
(2a? + be)(2b? + ca) =
and the first inequality is proved
As to the second inequality, we write it as
2(a+b)
2(a2 +b) + c(a +B)"
2c? +ab a? +b? +c? ~
which is equivalent to
c(a?+b?-ab—c?)_ c(a+b)(a+b—2c)
ab + 2c? ~ 2(a? + b?)+c(a +b)”
More difficult inequalities 281
Since a+b — 2c > 0 and 2(a? +b?) + cla +b) = (a+b)? +c(a +b) = (a+
b)(a+b +c), it suffices to prove that
a’ +b? —ab— atb—2c
ab + 2c? a+bte
+b)
since a? +b? —ab> @ a > picivenough wo check that
(a+ bP 4c? | ala tb = 2c)
ab+2c2 ~ atb+ce
This is true because
(a+b) ~4c? 4(atb~2c) (at b~20)[(a= bP +3c(a+b—2)] 4
ab+22 atbtc (ab + 2c2)(a +b +c) =
The proof is completed. a
Problem 6.20. Let a, b, ¢ be nonnegative real numbers, no two of them are zero.
Prove that
be ca
Veet cea Vato + ae +oroF * cra
(Tran Quoc Anh)
Proof. From Hélder’s Inequality, we have
(SG) (Heo ro]= (He)
and hence, it follows that282 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Combining (1) and (2), we deduce that
Eire Date Re RE
and thus, it suffices to prove the stronger inequality
atbte ws (atb+c)?
vab+be+ca 2(a? +b? +c?) ~
Denote by L the left hand side of this inequality. By the AM-GM Inequality, we
get
a+b+c | atbte pat bbe?
2vab+betca 2Vab+be+ca Aa? +b? +c")
(a+b+c)4
(a+b+c)*
\ a(ab + bc + calla? +b? +c GY Tey
So, the proof is completed. Equality holds if and only if a = b and c = 0, or
b=canda=0, ore =a and b=0. a
Problem 6.21. Let a, b, ¢ be positive real numbers. Prove that
f bf if B+ +03
a? +b? 407"
po ng
PtabctO Ptabete | Otabeta
(Nguyen Van Thach)
Proof. Multiplying each side of the desired inequality by a3 + b3 +c +abe, we
can write it as
at (Me 8) (Sia + abc)
Le Lape
Now, by the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, we have
Sat (dee)!
¢
a
Lastaer® Sica? +abe +63)
(Dev)
More difficult inequalities 283
ee)
Lea)
or equivalently,
| Thus, it suffices to prove that
+ (ue) vy
Be). (Ee) Leen)
(Xe*) (Xie
This inequality can be written as
242)?
er) > 4) ab? +2abe Da.
a
since ))a‘(b? te) 2abe a? =D ya%(b-c)’, SY a26?(a?+b?)— 2 0b? =
Sia?b?(a— by and
2(e) sayays
va - 23 )09b3 =—
we can rewrite the inequality in the form
Ve-oF (« +b8c? —
which is true because
Dato? +c) + Da b(a? + 67) +
2abe ¥a°(b—c)?
Sev
4
2a*be >0,
ab+bc+ca
2a* 4 4
@este 2 og hep
ab+bet+ca 5 ab+be+ca
2a*be
4
PR
(5) aes
The proof is completed. Note that equality holds if and only if a= b284 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Problem 6.22. Let a, b,c be positive real numbers. Prove that
abc. Hab i.
eb ae (al +be+ca)_ 17
boc a at+b? +c?
(Vo Quoe Ba Can)
Proof. First we prove the following statement
Lemma, If a, b, ¢ ate positive real numbers, then
ai bec 28(ab + be +ca) |
bic a’ (@tbece =”
boca
Proof. Expanding and combining like terms, the inequality turns into
3
xS 5 vaya, ab > 10a,
or, equivalently,
(af+Ee-
2b
ab? ab?
2S) e(4 =
Notice that
a a?h ab? B8 a*b — 2ab? b(a— b)?
+) —-2) —= _ =) —.
LPL S ET LF) re
and
ab? 4ca? c(2a — 3b)?
4D -aeb=¥ (F-20498) =p
Applying the AM-GM Inequality, we get
a a’b ab? ab?
(= hs ES) (e-s a=
blab? ‘2a — 3b)?
->| (aby? | e(2a~3b)
c b
22) (a -b)(2a-3b)
=10))a?-10 Vad.
The lemma is proved.
Lee) 210} a?-10 ab.
EEE
More difficult inequalities _ 285
Returning to our problem, we see that it suffices to show that
28(ab+be+ca) 7ab+be+ca)_ 17
(atb+cP a? +b? +c? .
This can be written in succession as follows
7 4 7(ab+be+ca) > 28(ab + be +ca)
2° a+b? +c? (at+b+cP
7atb+c)? _ 28(ab+be+ca)
2a? +b? +c?) (a+b+c)*
(a+b +c) > 8(a? + b? +c7)(ab + be + ca).
By the AM-GM Inequality, we have
8(a? + b* +c*)(ab + be +ca) = 4+ (a? + b? +c”) - 2(ab + be +ca)
< [(a? +b? +c?) + 2(ab + be +ca)}? =(at+b+c)*
So, the last inequality is true and our proof is completed. Equality holds if and
b
2n
v7 ~ tan
tan =
¢
= ——— = or any cyclic permutation.
V7 tan
¥
a
only if —“— =
7—tan>
V7 ~ tans
a
Problem 6.23. Let a, b, c be nonnegative real numbers satisfying ab+be-+ca = 1
Prove that
to dig bead
22+—=:
vote veta Vvat+b v2
(Le Trung Kien)
Proof. Without loss of generality, we may assume that a > b > c. First we will
prove that
1 1 1
rere pin eceeetcin Wifes ®)
Vbe+1 vctt1 V(b+c}?+1
This inequality is equivalent to
1 1, 2 ed 1 1 2
+l +l Ys iyet1) (b+) +1 (b+cP+1
Notice that
(b+ c)? +1—(b? +.1)(c? +1) = be(2 — be) 0.More difficult inequalities 287
286 Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
Therefore Since
2 % 2 a
7 av2 1 2v2
(b+1Kc? +1) Vb+cp t+ + -2 pt+—— 5
. a) 2va Jeag Va='*34e-3
and hence, it suffices to prove that
2v2 yl (¢=2)(v2e?-r=2) |
=t+— -2-— = ——* 20,
>14—_1 a v2 vat?
~) (b+c +1 . 5 P
the last inequality is true and our proof is thus completed. Equality holds if and
only ifa = b = 1 and c =0, or any cyclic permutation. oO
This is equivalent to.
bel2~ 2be—belb+e}2]
@+ Nero +erriy =>
which is true because
2— abe ~ be(b +e}? = Zab +e)— be(b +c)? =(b +e)[2a— be(b +e)]
2 (b +c)[2a—a(b +c)] = ab +)(2-ab—ac)>0.
Now, using the inequality (+), we get
1 1
+ =¥,
vatb Vate mel
i
1
+
V(b+clbt+a) VS(c+aye+b)
= 1 1 — bre
=Vbt+e +——— | > Vose4,f—7*
(& =) Wine (b+cP +1
Thus, the original inequality is true if
14 Jones BE soph
vb+e (tera te
+ Vb +c > 2, we have
bte 1 1 I
O+Ps1 1 Bo
@+cP+1 Beko oe
bte
and the inequality becomes
Problem 6.24. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers such that ab + be +ca = 3.
Prove that, for any nonnegative real number k, the following inequality holds
— _¢_—_1 41 5 3
(a+kbe (b+ke> (C+kay ~ (k+1
(iran Quoc Anh)
Proof. By Hilder’s Inequality, we have
1 3 3/4) 4
[Saves] [Maw +ke)] > (Ne ) .
It follows that
4
(Ste) (a3/4 4 3/4 4 9/494
x
ee kee = [Zee +ke)] ~ (k+ 13 (ab + be + cae
(03/4 + 3/4 $4)
© WIE Dab be + cay”
and so, it is sufficient to prove that
(a9/* + B94 + 63/4)* > oV3(ab + be +ca)*?
Let a’/# = x, b9/4 = y and c¥/4 =z. This inequality is equivalent to
(x+y +2)* > 9V3[(xy)*4 + (y2)3 + ex BP,
Because it is a homogeneous inequality, we may assume that x + y +z
Then, we have to prove that
(ey)? + (yz) +(ex)¥3 <3288
‘Vasile Cirtoaje - Vo Quoc Ba Can - Tran Quoc Anh
for x + y +2 =3. Applying the AM-GM Inequality, we have
@y)8s
xty+1 4-2 wae ¥te+1 4-x
epee (3, gE
3 +» Gays 3
3
(ax) g FERHI
3
Therefore,
(xy) + (ya) + ex)? = xy-(xy)!8 tye (ye)!3 dex (ox)
s zits —2) + y2(4—x)+2x(4-y)]
= jlaxy +yz+sx)—3xyz].
To complete the proof, we need to show that
Alxy + yz +2x) —3xyz <9,
which is equivalent to the third degree Schur’s Inequality
A(xy + yzt+ex\(x+y +2) <9xyzt (x+y +2).
Equality holds if and only if a = b
Problem 6.25. Let a, b, c be positive real numbers such that abe = 1. If k > 0,
then
is, a 1
lta+bk 14+b+e
(Wasile Cirtoaje)
Proof. We have two cases to consider.
Case 1. k > 1. By expanding, we can write the inequality as
Meto+ Yates Vak+ Ya.
By the Weighted AM-GM Inequality, we get
kab + Sako = Dako+e)2 k+ Na k+l ott
=(k+1) atta,
More difficult inequalities
and
R+k+1
Yiaty ek ab = Sst (a0-+5 et — )
enta 244) FT
a(k+p ye fe pea? cM)
Peeey) an2snen)) BT
=e! (Wt )
=G4+D aa es =D Yaa |
Summing up these two inequalities, it follows that
Srattb+ Watt > Yaa at + Sattar
Moreover, by Chebyshev’s Inequality we have |
ade 2 (Le) (Lat) asemae (Ze)
and
ayiatat =a alter > (Sa) (Sat)
> x(abe}*8°5 (Sa) =3 0a, |
and hence a |
Yet + Valter > Yate Va. |
Therefore, |
Matty + Vath > Pat+ a,
which is what we want to prove.
1
Case 2.0