CFT
CFT
Dr. C. Haldar
Department of Chemistry, IIT (ISM)
1. A purely ionic model for transition metal complexes. In its simplest treatment CFT
does not consider covalent bonding in complexes.
2. Ligands are considered as point charge.
3. The CFT does not provide for electrons to enter the metal orbitals, i.e. it does not
consider any orbital overlap.
4. Predicts the pattern of splitting of d-orbitals.
5. Used to rationalize spectroscopic and magnetic properties.
Octahedral complex (Oh) Tetrahedral complex (Td) Square planer complex (Sp)
d-orbitals: look attentively along the axis
• We assume an octahedral array of negative charges placed
around the metal ion (which is positive).
• The ligand and orbitals lie on the same axes as negative
charges.
– Therefore, there is a large, unfavorable interaction between
ligand (-) and these orbitals.
– These orbitals form the degenerate high energy pair of
energy levels.
• The dxy, dyz, and dxz orbitals bisect the negative charges.
– Therefore, there is a smaller repulsion between ligand and
metal for these orbitals.
– These orbitals form the degenerate low energy set of energy
levels.
Octahedral Field
In Octahedral Field
dyz
dz2
dxz
dx2-y2
dxy
Distortions of Octahedral Complexes
Distortions of Octahedral Complexes: Jahn-Teller effect
‘Any non-linear molecule having an orbitally degenerate electronic
configuration is unstable, and the system undergo distortion to remove
the degeneracy.’
t< o
t= 0.45 o
For the same metal and ligands and the same
internuclear distances
BEYOND d3
• In weak field: O P, => t2g3eg1
• In strong field O P, => t2g4
• P - pairing energy
Ground-state Electronic Configuration,
Magnetic Properties and Colour
d2 Ti2+, V3+
d3 Cr3+, Mn4+,V2+
When the 4th electron is assigned it will either go into the higher
energy eg orbital at an energy cost of o or be paired at an energy cost
of P, the pairing energy.
d4
P < o P > o
Coulombic repulsion energy and exchange energy
Ground-state Electronic Configuration,
Magnetic Properties
[Mn(H2O)6]3+
Weak Field Complex
the total spin (S) is 4 ½ = 2
High Spin Complex
Weak field d4
[Mn(CN)6]3-
Strong field Complex
total spin (S) is 2 ½ = 1
Low Spin Complex
Strong field d4
Placing electrons in d orbitals
d5 d6 d7
d8 d9 d10
2+ eg eg
OH2
+ 0.6 oct
OH2
H 2O
Co - 0.4 oct
H 2O
OH2
t2g t2g
OH2
• = {n(n+2)}1/2 B
• In d4, d5, d6, and d7 octahedral complexes, magnetic
measurements can very easily predict weak versus strong field.
• Tetrahedral complexes - only high spin complexes result,
for t O.
n = no. of unpaired electrons
= {n(n+2)}1/2 B
Ion n S /B Experimental
Calculated
E h
E1
E = E2 – E1 = h
As Cr3+ goes from being attached to a weak field ligand to a strong field ligand,
increases and the color of the complex changes from green to yellow.
Limitations of CFT
Considers Ligand as Point charge/dipole only
Does not take into account of the overlap of ligand and
metal orbitals
Consequence
e.g. Fails to explain why CO is stronger ligand than CN- in
complexes having metal in low oxidation state
Ligand Field Theory: Concepts
p-orbitals
Ligand Orbitals(LGO)are
obtained by Linear
Combination of Atomic
Orbitals (LCAO)
LGOs overlap with
symmetry related Metal
Orbitals
M L
MO diagram of an Octahedral complex
Metals in Low Oxidation States
• In low oxidation states, the electron density on the metal ion is very high.
• To stabilize low oxidation states, we require ligands, which can simultaneously bind
the metal center and also withdraw electron density from it.
Stabilizing Low Oxidation State: CO Can Do the Job
*
π*
nb
nb
*
MO of π-complex
Stabilizing Low Oxidation State: CO Can Do the Job