KSPH&IDCL IMS Procedure IMSP 17
Performance measurement and monitoring
1.0 Purpose
The purpose of this procedure is to define a system for monitoring and measurement of key
elements of IMS to facilitate management for determining opportunities for improvement,
through the management review process.
2.0 Application
This procedure is applicable to all the processes of KSPH&IDCL’s integrated management
system established and documented in the IMS manual and other system documents
referred therein.
2.0 Responsibility
Concerned HODs as defined in the procedure
3.0 Terms and definitions
None
4.0 Procedures
The performance of quality and the environmental management systems are critical to the
achievement of organization/s policy, mission and vision. The top management of
KSPH&IDCL recognizes the fact that:
a) People perform the process
b) Process produce a product / service
c) Product / service produce profit (both tangible and intangible)
Hence, the following are critical to determine the performance level of IMS:
1) Product conformity
2) Process measures
3) Project performance
Revision: 1 Revision Date: 01.07.2015 Page 1 of 5
KSPH&IDCL IMS Procedure IMSP 17
Performance measurement and monitoring
Concerned HODs / personnel as described in Table 1 through Table 3, shall collate data,
analyze and determine the performance level at prescribed periodicity. They shall submit the
summary of these data / data analysis in the MRM to facilitate the top management to
provide further direction to achieve improvement.
Table 1 – Product conformity
Sl. Responsibility to
Product parameter Details required Frequency
No provide details
Deviation from EE and AEE of
specifications, its concerned
Adherence to design
1 reasons, acceptance division(s) Quarterly
specifications
obtained / authorized executing the
by -details project
Adherence to design Inspection reports of
2 CE, SE and EE(QC) Quarterly
specifications CE, SE and EE(QC)
Time and cost involved EE and AEE of
in resolving concerned
3 Cost of nonconformity nonconformities related division(s) Quarterly
to product executing the
(construction activity) project
Table 2 – Process performance
Sl. Process performance Responsibility to
Process Frequency
No indicators provide details
Management Number of actions pending
1 MR and CC-QMS Half yearly
responsibility crossing target date
Number of improvement
MR and CC-QMS Half yearly
recommendations
Progress made in objective
MR and CC-QMS Half yearly
achievement
Number of trainings
2 Training AAO Half yearly
conducted
Number of topics covered AAO Half yearly
Revision: 1 Revision Date: 01.07.2015 Page 2 of 5
KSPH&IDCL IMS Procedure IMSP 17
Performance measurement and monitoring
Sl. Process performance Responsibility to
Process Frequency
No indicators provide details
Number of personnel
AAO Half yearly
benefited
Summary of effectiveness
AAO Half yearly
of training, if available
Number of payments not
3 Finance management made on time (for CAO Quarterly
accepted bills)
Number of noncompliance
related to statutory CAO Half yearly
requirements
Number of concessions
requested in relation to
Customer related initially proposed and SE-Designs and EE
4 Half yearly
processes agreed layout and product of concerned project
features (Project-concept
development stage)
Incorporation of technical
Design and advances in construction,
5 SE-Designs Half yearly
development eco-friendly measures
adopted
Comparative statement on
cost-effectiveness SE-Designs / EE of
Half yearly
achieved (in relations to concerned project
previous similar projects)
Supplier performance with
6 Purchasing –General regard to quality and timely AAO Half-yearly
delivery
Purchasing – Supplier performance with EE(QC) / EE in
7 Construction regard to quality and timely charge of respective Half yearly
contracts delivery projects
Number of deviations
EE, AEE and AE
Construction identified after completion
8 and JE of respective Half yearly
Management of an activity / stage of
projects
construction
Nonconformities identified
EE (QC)and
by QC – related to Half yearly
AEE-QC
constructions
System down time
9 Project monitoring (monitored on weekly AEE-PM Half yearly
basis)
Revision: 1 Revision Date: 01.07.2015 Page 3 of 5
KSPH&IDCL IMS Procedure IMSP 17
Performance measurement and monitoring
Sl. Process performance Responsibility to
Process Frequency
No indicators provide details
Delay in communication of
monthly Project-status
10 summary to the top EE-PM Half yearly
th
management (target – 5
of every month)
Number of valid customer PRO / EE (QC) /
11 Customer satisfaction Half yearly
complaints EE (Division)
Number of complaints PRO / EE (QC) /EE
Half yearly
pending for resolution (Division)
Number of positive
PRO Half yearly
feedbacks received
Number of negative
feedbacks received and PRO / EE (QC) / EE
Half yearly
accepted for initiating (Division)
actions
Quality management
Number of nonconformities
system (assessed
12 – Clause wise and function MR and CC-QMS Half yearly
through internal
wise
audits)
Management of
Number of environmental
13 environmental Site In-charge Quarterly
incidents
aspects
Degree to which
Improvements in
environmental objectives
14 environmental Site In-charge Quarterly
adopted in construction
management
projects
Table 3 – Progress evaluation of project objectives
Responsibility to
Sl.No Project name Project objectives Frequency
provide details
(Mention the objective set
for the project with regard
(Mention the Designated project
1 to cost, time, features and Half Yearly
project name) personnel
others along with details
required for review)
Revision: 1 Revision Date: 01.07.2015 Page 4 of 5
KSPH&IDCL IMS Procedure IMSP 17
Performance measurement and monitoring
5.0 Records
Concerned HODs shall maintain records / data as described in procedural part and submit
during MRM. These data / records shall be retained by respective HODs at least for a
minimum period of one year.
6.0 Reference
a) ISO 9001: 2008 Clause Number 8.2.3
b) ISO 14001: 2004 Clause number 4.5.1
c) IMS Manual Clause Number 9
7.0 Associated Documents
1) Procedure for control of records IMSP 02
2) Procedure for management review IMSP 28
Approved by : Managing Director
Revision: 1 Revision Date: 01.07.2015 Page 5 of 5
