SCM With Examples
SCM With Examples
Management (SCM)
SUBMITTED BY:-
NAME – Mohit Jain
COURSE – B-TECH 6TH SEM.
BRANCH – Industrial Engineering & Management
ROLL NO. – 1120278
SUBJECT – SEMINAR
What is a Supply Chain?
A supply chain is the system of organizations, people,
activities, information and resources involved in moving a
product or service from supplier to customer. Supply chain
activities transform raw materials and components into a
finished product that is delivered to the end customer.
Supplier
Supplier
A Supply Chain Example…
V. Highlands
Kroger
Peachtree
Publix
GA
Coke Ocean Drive
End customer
Ft. Laud.
JNJ FL
Kellog
AL
P&G
TX
Tier 1
suppliers
State Local stores
distributors Super market
chains
A Example Of A Supply Chain
Say we get an order from a European retailer to produce 10,000
garments. For this customer we might decide to buy yarn from a
Korean producer but have it woven and dyed in Taiwan. So we pick the
yarn and ship it to Taiwan. The Japanese have the best zippers … so we
go to YKK, a big Japanese zipper manufacturer, and we order the right
zippers from their Chinese plants. …the best place to make the
garments is Thailand. So we ship everything there. …the customer
needs quick delivery, we may divide the order across five factories in
Thailand. Effectively, we are customizing the value chain to best meet
the customer’s needs. (Interview of Victor Fung of Li & Fung in HBR,
Sept-Oct 1998.)
In the interview example, it can be seen that Li & Fung has created a
supply chain for the purpose of meeting a customer’s needs. In
general, this case is more the exception than the rule, but serves to
illustrate some of the pieces of a supply chain.
Supply Chain Management
Supply chain management deals with linking the
organizations within the supply chain in order to meet
demand across the chain as efficiently as possible.
Supply Demand
Customer value
How is customer value created by the supply chain?
Retailer Orders
Customer
Demand
Time
Source: Tom Mc Guffry, Electronic Commerce and Value Chain Management, 1998
Inventory Management Disaster-Apple Misses Power Mac Demand
Many forget than even through the mid-1990s, Apple was often the leader in market share
in the then still deeply fragmented PC market. That position took a permanent hit in the
last half of 1995 due to supply chain foibles.
Apple was introducing its new line of Power Mac PCs, to be launched just before the
Christmas season in 1995. Just two years before, however, the company had been burned by
excess inventories and production capacity during a similar launch for its Power Book
laptops. At one point, Apple
So this time, it played things very conservatively. That turned had an order
out to be the expensive option. backlog of $1 billion.
When demand for Power Macs exploded, Apple was caught short for the critical
Christmas season. Forecasts were too low, there wasn’t enough flex in the
supply chain, and some parts suppliers developed additional delivery issues. At
one point, Apple has $1 billion dollars in unfilled orders in its system. Unable to
capitalize on the market opportunity it had been handed, the stock price was
soon cut in half, the CEO was shown the door, shareholder lawsuits came
pouring in, and Apple’s market position in PCs took a permanent hit such that it
took the IPOD years later to lead a recovery in the company.
Some of the causes of variability that leads to the bullwhip effect includes:
•Demand forecasting Many firms use the min-max inventory policy. This means that
when the inventory level falls to the reorder point (min) an order is placed to bring the level
back to the max , or the order-up-to-level. This leads to variability.
•Lead time As lead time increases, safety stocks are increased, and order quantities are
increased. More variability.
•Batch ordering. Many firms use batch ordering such as with a min-max inventory
policy. Their suppliers then see a large order followed by periods of no orders followed by
another large order. This pattern is repeated such that suppliers see a highly variable
pattern of orders.
•Price fluctuation. If prices to retailers fluctuate, then they may try to stock up when
prices are lower, again leading to variability.
•Inflated orders. When retailers expect that a product will be in short supply, they will
tend to inflate orders to insure that they will have ample supply to meet customer demand.
When the shortage period comes to an end, the retailer goes back to the smaller orders,
thus causing more variability.
Methods for coping with the bullwhip effect include:
Centralizing. Centralizing demand information occurs when customer demand
information is available to all members of the supply chain. This information can be
used to better predict what products and volumes are needed and when they are
needed such that manufacturers can better plan for production. However, even
though centralizing demand information can reduce the bullwhip effect, it will not
eliminate it.
Reducing uncertainty. This can be accomplished by centralizing demand
information.
Reducing variability. This can be accomplished by using a technique made
popular by Wal-Mart and then Home Depot called everyday low pricing (EDLP).
EDLP eliminates promotions as well as the shifts in demand that accompany them.
Reducing lead time. Order times can be reduced by using EDI (electronic data
interchange).
Strategic partnerships. The use of strategic partnerships can change how
information is shared and how inventory is managed within the supply chain. These
will be discussed later.
General Motor’s Robot Mania
General Motor’s CEO in the 1980s was Roger Smith, Smith was fascinated with technology.
Among other projects, such as the purchase of IT firm EDS, Smith embarked on a very aggressive
effort to implement robots in GM factories. When Smith was appointed, GM had approximately
300
robots of one kind of another. He soon created a joint venture with Japan’s robot designer Fujitsu-
Fanuc, and said he planned to deploy 14,000 new robots in GM plants by 1990.
Bad move.
Costing billions of dollars, the robots never really worked. As one observer wrote, “The robots
accidentally painted themselves and dropped windshields on to front seats.”
In the late 1970s, with about 200 stores, Wal-Mart was a relatively small retailer.
At that time, Sears and Kmart dominated the retail market. Since then, Wal-
Mart gained significant market share from these retailers and became the
largest and most profitable retailer in the world. Today, Wal-Mart is admired for
its collaboration and technology driven supply chain practices and is leading the
retailing industry with its innovative supply chain practices.
"People think we got big by putting big stores in small
towns. Really, we got big by replacing inventory with
information.”
Sam Walton, Founder of Wal-Mart
Traditional
Supply Chain
?
Dell Supply
Chain
On April 20, 2001 Dell toppled Compaq as the world’s largest PC maker*
Dell’s market share was 12.8% as opposed to Compaq’s market share 12.1%
Compaq and HP could not get into a price war with Dell because
Dell’s profit margin was 18%
Compaq and HP’s profit margins were in single digits SUPPLIERS For DELL
MICROSOFT - for Windows
INTEL- for micro processors
NVIDIA - for Graphic chips
*Source: Forbes.com, April 24, 2001 SONY- for monitors
DELL DIRECT SELLING
New Value Chain: Dell had no in-house stock of finished goods inventories unlike
competitors using the traditional value chain model
Pull Mechanism: It did not have to wait for resellers to clear out their own
inventories before it could push new models into the marketplace (typically
operated with 60-70 days stock)