Scribd
Upload
117 views2 pages

People Vs Germina

Appellant arrived at Raymund's residence looking for him regarding a previous quarrel between appellant's brother and Raymund. When Raymund arrived, appellant drew his gun, prompting Raymund and his relatives to flee. Raymund stumbled and fell, and appellant shot him in the back of the neck, killing him. Appellant claimed self-defense, saying Raymund threatened him with a bladed weapon. The court found voluntary surrender and passion could be considered mitigating circumstances, as appellant undisputedly surrendered to police right after the shooting, and the crime was committed due to anger over Raymund injuring appellant's mentally disabled brother.

Uploaded by

TaJheng Barde
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
117 views2 pages

People Vs Germina

Appellant arrived at Raymund's residence looking for him regarding a previous quarrel between appellant's brother and Raymund. When Raymund arrived, appellant drew his gun, prompting Raymund and his relatives to flee. Raymund stumbled and fell, and appellant shot him in the back of the neck, killing him. Appellant claimed self-defense, saying Raymund threatened him with a bladed weapon. The court found voluntary surrender and passion could be considered mitigating circumstances, as appellant undisputedly surrendered to police right after the shooting, and the crime was committed due to anger over Raymund injuring appellant's mentally disabled brother.

Uploaded by

TaJheng Barde
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Passion cannot co-exist with treachery

G.R. No. 120881 May 19, 1998


PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee,
vs.
ELPIDIO GERMINA y MALDO, accused-appellant,

MARTINEZ, J.:
appellant, armed with a revolver, arrived at the Angeles residence looking for Raymund
who was no there at that time. A heated conversation took place between Raymund's
relatives (parent, brothers and sisters) and appellant concerning a quarrel that
transpired earlier between appellant's brother and Raymund. Moments later, Raymund
arrived. Appellant, upon spotting him, drew his gun which prompted Raymund and his
relatives to scamper for safety. Hardly had Raymund gained momentum in his retreat
when he stumbled on a street hump and fell on the ground face down. Appellant easily
caught up with and then fired at his defenselessly positioned prey — the single bullet
finding its mark on the back of Raymund's neck. The victim died in the hospital.
The autopsy report and testimony of prosecution revealed that Raymund succumbed to
a gunshot wound found at the back right side of his buttock.

Accused, for his part, did not deny having shot Raymund, but said that it was for self
defense. According to appellant, he sought Raymund to verify news that the latter
mauled and stabbed his mentally retarded brother, Rafael. At the Angeles residence,
appellant, together with his wife Nida and Rafael, talked to Raymund's relatives about
the mauling/stabbing incident. Shortly thereafter, Raymund appeared, joined the group
and with a double-bladed weapon in his right hand, cursed appellant: "Putang ina mo,
papatayin ko kayo!"The relatives of the victim tried to hold him at bay but to no avail.
Accused then attempted to run away but as he found himself cornered against a wall
and when Raymund was about to strike him with the bladed weapon, he fired at
Raymund. Accused left the place immediately thereafter and voluntarily gave himself up
to the police.

ISSUE
WoN voluntary surrender and passion and obfuscation can be raised as mitigating
circumstances (YES)

RULING:
But while the trial court may have erred on this issue, its findings as to the presence of
the mitigating circumstances of voluntary surrender and passion, nonetheless, deserve
affirmance. Voluntary surrender was correctly appreciated because it appeared
spontaneous and unconditional, 19 as appellant's claim that he voluntarily gave himself
up to SPO2 Marteja right after shooting Raymund remains undisputed. Passion also
existed as it clearly arose from lawful sentiments or legitimate feelings. 20 The trial
court's observation on this point is worth reiterating:
. . . he [appellant] committed the serious crime due to the
maltreatment/physical injuries inflicted by the victim on his mentally
retarded brother, that triggered his anger which diminish (sic)/weaken (sic)
the exercise of his power, . . .

You might also like