Scribd
Upload
215 views1 page

Tuason vs. Mariano: Land Title Dispute

This case involves a land dispute over a parcel of land covered by Original Certificate of Title No. 735. Manuela Aquial and Maria Aquial filed a complaint to be declared owners, alleging the land was fraudulently included in OCT No. 735. JM Tuason & Co, holders of transfer certificates from OCT No. 735, sought dismissal. The court held that under the principle of stare decisis, the validity of OCT No. 735 had long been settled and respondents could not relitigate the matter without disturbing what had been decided. The trial court was directed to dismiss the case with prejudice.

Uploaded by

Nico Nico
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
215 views1 page

Tuason vs. Mariano: Land Title Dispute

This case involves a land dispute over a parcel of land covered by Original Certificate of Title No. 735. Manuela Aquial and Maria Aquial filed a complaint to be declared owners, alleging the land was fraudulently included in OCT No. 735. JM Tuason & Co, holders of transfer certificates from OCT No. 735, sought dismissal. The court held that under the principle of stare decisis, the validity of OCT No. 735 had long been settled and respondents could not relitigate the matter without disturbing what had been decided. The trial court was directed to dismiss the case with prejudice.

Uploaded by

Nico Nico
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

JM Tuason and Co. Inc. et. al. vs. Mariano et. al.

G. R. No. L-33140. October 23, 1978

FACTS:

On October 1, 1965, Manuela Aquial and Maria Aquial filed a complaint in forma
pauperis in the Court of First Instance of Rizal Pasig Branch X, wherein they prayedto
be declared the owners of a parcel of land located at Balara, Marikina, Rizal, docketed as
Civil Case No. 8943. They alleged that sometime in 1960, or after J. M. Tuason & Co.,
Inc. had illegally entered upon that land, they discovered that it had been fraudulently or
erroneously included in the Original Certificate of Title No. 735 of the Registry of Deeds
of Rizal. They further alleged that transfer certificates of title, derived from OCT No.
735, were issued to J. M. Tuason & Co., Inc., et.al.

J.M. Tuason & Co., Inc. filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds of lack of
jurisdiction, improper venue, prescription, laches and prior judgment. The plaintiffs
opposed that motion. The lower court denied it. The grounds of the motion to dismiss
were pleaded as affirmative defenses in the answer of Tuason and J. M. Tuason & Co.,
Inc. They insisted that a preliminary hearing be held on those defenses. The Tuason and
J. M. Tuason & Co., Inc. filed the instant civil actions of certiorari and prohibition
praying, inter alia, that the trial court be ordered to dismiss the complaint and enjoined
from proceeding in the said case, and a writ of preliminary injunction was issued.

ISSUE:

Whether OCT No. 735 and the titles derived therefrom can be questioned at this late
hour by respondents Aquial and Cordova.

HELD:

NO. The trial court was directed to dismiss Civil Case 8943 with prejudice and
without costs.

Considering the governing principle of stare decisis et non quieta movere (follow
past precedents and do not disturb what has been settled), respondents Aquial and
Cordova cannot maintain their action in Civil Case No. 8943 without eroding the long
settled holding of the courts that OCT No. 735 is valid and no longer open to attack.It is
against public policy that matters already decided on the merits be relitigated again and
again, consuming the court’s time and energies at the expense of other litigants.

You might also like