Journal of Solar Energy Research (JSER) Journal of Solar Energy Research (JSER)
Journal of Solar Energy Research (JSER) Journal of Solar Energy Research (JSER)
Archive of SID
Journal of Solar Energy Research Vol 4 No 1 (2019) 73-83
ClickPerformance
here, type the
Analysis
title of your
of Solar
paper,
Air Capitalize
Heater Having
first letter
Absorber
of each
Plate
words
Artificially Roughened by Chamfered-Square Elements
First Authora, Second Authorb,*
M. S. Azada*, A. Layekb
a
First affiliation, Address, City and Postcode, Country
b
a Second affiliation,
CSIR-Central Address,
Mechanical CityResearch
Engineering and Postcode, CountryIndia; *Email: [email protected]
Institute, Durgapur,
b
Mechanical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, India
ARTICLE
ARTICLEINFO
INFO A B S T R A C T
Received:
Received
Received:in 20
revised
Marchform:
2019 A very common technique to improve the thermo hydraulic performance of solar air heater is
Accepted:
Received in revised form: Click hereartificial
providing and insert roughness
your abstract
on absorber
text. Click
plate.here
Diagonally
and insertchamfered
your abstract
cuboids
text.hasClick
beenhere
usedand
Available
20 April online:
2019 to generate
insert your roughness and Click
abstract text. applied on and
here the absorber
insert yoursurface. A numerical
abstract text. Click study
hereisand
performed to
insert your
Accepted: 25 April 2019 study thetext.
abstract enhancement
Click hereofand theinsert
thermo yourhydraulic
abstract performance of the
text. Click here andheater
insert for
yourthoroughness
abstract text.
Available online: 10 May
parameters
Click here andof relative roughness
insert your pitch
abstract (transverse
text. Click hereand andlongitudinal)
insert your of 6 to 14,
abstract cross
text. section
Click here of
and
2019
Keywords: insert your
cuboids fromabstract
8 mm text.
to 14Click
mm and hererelative
and insert
roughness
your abstract
height oftext.
0.44Click
to 0.088.
here The
and Reynolds
insert your
2
Type 3-6 keywords abstract is
number text.
keptClick
in thehere
range
andofinsert
5000yourto 22500
abstract
withtext.
a constant
Click here
heatandfluxinsert
of 1000yourW/m
abstract
on the
text.
here, Click hereplate.
absorber and The
insertnumerical
your abstract
computation
text. Click
is conducted
here and insert
by using
yourtheabstract
ANSYS text.FLUENT
Click hereCFD and
Keywords: insert yourThe
software. abstract
standard turbulence
text.k-εClick here and model with
insert yourenhanced
abstractwall
text.treatment
Click herehasandbeeninsert
used your
to
separated by
Solar air heater;
semicolons ; abstractthe
handle text.
flow
Click
turbulence.
here and TheinsertNusselt
your abstract
numbertext.
andClick
the average
here andfriction
insert factor
your abstract
are determined
text Click
Artificial roughness; for
heredifferent
and insertvalues
yourofabstract
relativetext
roughness
Click here pitch
and(transverse
insert yourand longitudinal),
abstract text Click cross
heresection of
and insert
ANSYS-FLUENT; cuboids and relative
your abstract text Click roughness
here andheight. The abstract
insert your values of textNusselt number
Click here and and
insertfriction factor of
your abstract text
CFD; Overall roughened solarinsert
Click here and air heater is compared with smooth duct at similar flow condition to find out
your abst
enhancement ratio; the enhanced performance.
Thermal performance
© 2019 Published byby
© 2013Published University ofof
University Tehran Press.
Tehran AllAll
Press. rights reserved.
rights reserved.
74 www.SID.ir
Author name / JHMTR 00 (2013) 000–000 75
Archive of SID
The system of governing equation consists of absorber plate are adiabatic and the
the continuity, momentum and energy equations. working fluid air is incompressible for the
The governing equations for 3-D domain are
shown below:
test range of SAH. These assumptions
Continuity equation: were made based on the previous
investigations done by the researchers in
u v w their experiments. Table.1 shows the
0 (1)
x y z thermophysical properties of air and
aluminum plate which are working fluid
Momentum equation: and absorber plate respectively.
75 www.SID.ir
Author name / JHMTR 00 (2013) 000–000 76
Archive of SID
Figure 2. Variation of Nusselt number for different predicted turbulence models with the Dittus-Boelter relation for smooth
duct
Amongst the all predicted values the STD k-ε results which have been compared with various
turbulence model have been found best fitted with turbulence models for friction factor varying with
the Dittus-Boelter empirical correlation and the Reynolds number. The values found for STD k-ε
modified Blasius equation results. It is very clearly turbulence model are within 5% deviation from the
shown in, Fig.2 where Dittus-Boelter correlation predicted value from the Dittus-Boelter correlation
results have been compared with various and modified Blasius equation for the Nusselt
turbulence models for Nusselt number varying with number and friction factors respectively are within
Reynolds number for smooth duct. Similarly it is acceptable limit. Based on the validation results
shown in, Fig.3 for modified Blasius correlation STD k-ε turbulent model is selected for CFD
analysis of SAH duct to get best result.
Figure 3. Variation of friction factor for different predicted turbulence models with the modified Blasius relation for smooth
duct.
76 www.SID.ir
Author name / JHMTR 00 (2013) 000–000 77
Archive of SID
of Nusselt number with respect to Reynolds
4. Results & Discussion number for different relative roughness pitch
(longitudinal pitch, Pa/e = 6, 7, 8 and transverse
All simulation results found for the roughened pitch, Pt/e = 4, 6, 7, 8), fixed element size and fixed
absorber plate are presented and compared with the relative roughness height of the roughness element
smooth plate result. The improvement in is shown in Fig.4. The variation of Nusselt number
thermohydraulic performance of the SAH for with respect to Reynolds number for different
variable flow rate is discussed below. element size having fixed longitudinal and
transverse relative roughness pitch (Pa/e = 7, Pt/e =
7) and fixed Relative roughness height is shown in
4.1. Heat Transfer
Fig.5. Similarly, The variation of Nusselt number
with respect to Reynolds number for different
Nusselt number is function of heat transfer and
relative roughness height having fixed element size
shows the thermal behaviour of the SAH. Fig.4, 5
and fixed longitudinal and transverse relative
and 6, shows that the Nusselt number is directly
roughness pitch (Pa/e = 6, Pt/e = 6) is shown in Fig.
dependent on Reynolds number as Nusselt number
6.
increases with increase in is Reynolds number for
roughened as well as smooth plate . The variation
Figure 4. Variation of Nusselt Number for different relative roughness pitches having fixed element size and fixed relative
roughness height.
It can be clearly observed from the above plots Friction factor affects the thermohydraulic
that increase in the relative roughness pitch, cross performance of SAH. The effect of roughness on
sectional area and relative roughness height, friction factor studied is shown in Fig.7, 8 and 9.
increases the value of Nusselt number. It can be The variation of friction factor with respect to
also observed that the Nusselt number increases Reynolds number for different relative roughness
substantially for the roughened plate in comparison pitch (longitudinal pitch, Pa/e = 6, 7, 8 and
to the smooth plate. Hence, the SAH embedded transverse pitch, Pt/e = 4, 6, 7, 8) fixed cross
with the artificial roughness element is found to be section of the roughness element (8×4: arm×height)
more effective in a sense that it provides enhanced and fixed relative roughness height is shown in
thermal performance. The highest Nusselt number Fig.7. The variation of friction factor with respect
is found as 84.3 at Pa/e = 7, Pt/e = 7 (with element to Reynolds number for different element size
cross section of 12×4). having fixed longitudinal and transverse relative
roughness pitch (Pa/e = 7, Pt/e = 7) and fixed
4.2. Friction Factor Relative roughness height is shown in Fig.8.
77 www.SID.ir
Author name / JHMTR 00 (2013) 000–000 78
Archive of SID
Figure 5. Variation of Nusselt Number for different element size having fixed relative roughness pitch and fixed relative
roughness height.
Nusselt Number
Figure 6. Variation of Nusselt Number for different relative roughness height having fixed element size and fixed relative
roughness pitch.
Similarly, The variation of friction factor with friction factor decreases. This happens due to the
respect to Reynolds number for different relative suppression of laminar sub-layer for fully
roughness height having fixed element size and developed turbulent flow in the SAH duct. The
fixed longitudinal and transverse relative roughness maximum and minimum friction factor for the
pitch (Pa/e = 6, Pt/e = 6) is shown in Fig. 9. roughened absorber plate found is 0.0149 at Re =
It can be clearly observed from the above plots that 5000 for Pa/e = 7, Pt/e = 7 (with cross section 14×4)
with increase in Reynolds number the value of the and 0.00702 at Re = 22,500 for Pa/e = 7 and Pt/e =
7 (with cross section 8×2) respectively.
78 www.SID.ir
Author name / JHMTR 00 (2013) 000–000 79
Archive of SID
Friction factor
Figure 7. Variation of friction factor for different relative roughness pitch having fixed element size and fixed relative
roughness height.
Friction factor
Reynolds Number
Figure 8. Variation of friction factor for different element size having fixed relative roughness pitch and fixed relative
roughness height.
4.2. Nusselt number enhancement ratio of the roughened absorber plate to that of the
The enhancement ratio of the Nusselt number is smooth absorber plate [13]and can be calculated as;
defined as the ratio of the Nusselt number obtained
79 www.SID.ir
Author name / JHMTR 00 (2013) 000–000 80
Archive of SID
Friction factor
Reynolds Number
Figure 9. Variation of friction factor for different relative roughness height having fixed element size and fixed relative
roughness pitch
Nur/Nus
Reynolds Number
Figure 10. Variation of Enhancement ratio with respect to Reynolds number
80 www.SID.ir
Archive of SID
Similar to the enhancement ratio of the Nusselt cut square element as roughness element an
number, the friction factor ratio also gives greater increase in 40% in friction factor is found.
The maximum value of friction factor ratio is found
value for entire configurations i, e ˃1 for the
at least Reynolds number. The value of friction
range of Reynolds number studied. Fig. 11 shows factor ratio decreases with increase in Reynolds
that highest friction factor ratio is 1.4 at Pa/e=7, number for all sets of configurations studied.
Pt/e=7, cross section of 14x4. Using the diagonally
Frr/Frs
Reynolds Number
Figure 11. Variation of Friction factor ratio with respect to Reynolds number
81 www.SID.ir
Author name / JHMTR 00 (2013) 000–000 82
Archive of SID
Performance parameter, ɳ
Reynolds Number
Figure 12. Variation of performance parameter with Reynolds number