Scribd
Upload
64 views1 page

Rubric To Assess The Oral Competence

The rubric assesses written work on five criteria from unacceptable to excellent: 1) Relevance and content, evaluating how fully the task requirements are addressed. 2) Organization, examining introduction, body, conclusion, paragraphing and transitions. 3) Vocabulary and word choice, considering accuracy and appropriateness for audience and purpose. 4) Grammar, spelling and punctuation, noting sentence structures, spelling errors and punctuation. 5) Presentation, evaluating readability, neatness and errors.

Uploaded by

ssalcedo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
64 views1 page

Rubric To Assess The Oral Competence

The rubric assesses written work on five criteria from unacceptable to excellent: 1) Relevance and content, evaluating how fully the task requirements are addressed. 2) Organization, examining introduction, body, conclusion, paragraphing and transitions. 3) Vocabulary and word choice, considering accuracy and appropriateness for audience and purpose. 4) Grammar, spelling and punctuation, noting sentence structures, spelling errors and punctuation. 5) Presentation, evaluating readability, neatness and errors.

Uploaded by

ssalcedo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

RUBRIC TO ASSESS THE WRITTEN COMPETENCE

UNANCCEPTABLE MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE NOTABLE EXCELLENT


0 1-4 5-6 7-8 9-10
Relevance Does not attempt the Attempts to address the Addresses some of the Mostly covers the Fully satisfies the
and task/ the answer is topic but few relevant requirements. Includes requirements of the given requirements of the given
Content completely irrelevant. information. Digresses some relevant task. Includes most of the task. Includes all relevant
often from the topic. information but not relevant information. information.
clearly focused.

Organisation No clear message is Begins abruptly. No Attempts to include an Includes an introduction, Includes an inviting
communicated. paragraphing or introduction, body and body and conclusion. Uses introduction and a
inappropriate conclusion. Main idea is paragraphing successfully. satisfactory conclusion.
paragraphing. No attempt not clearly supported with Uses a range of cohesive Skillfully manages
to maintain logical details. Less attention devices but may look paragraphing. Logical
arrangement of ideas. given to organization. mechanical. arrangement of ideas.
Rare use of transitions. Manages all aspects of
cohesion well
Vocabulary and Inappropriate and Uses a limited range of Uses a fair range of Uses a fair range of Uses accurate vocabulary
Word inaccurate vocabulary vocabulary. Mostly vocabulary to express vocabulary to express which suits the audience
Choice inaccurate for the ideas. May be ideas. May be and purpose with a
purpose and audience. inappropriate for the inappropriate for the mixture of precise and
audience and purpose at audience and purpose at general words. Occasional
some occasions. some occasions. errors in word choice.

Grammar, Writing Uses mostly sentence Uses basic sentence Uses mostly correct Uses a variety of
Spelling incomprehensible. fragments with frequent structures with some sentence structures with grammatically correct
and errors. Frequent errors in errors. Uses spelling and 1-2 mistakes. Correct sophisticated sentence
Punctuation spelling and punctuation. punctuation with some spelling and appropriate structures. Perfect
errors punctuation with spelling and accurate
occasional errors. punctuation

Presentation Illegible. Not clear. Considerable Fairly readable. Some Mostly readable, neat, Neat, easy to read, error
strain on the reader. strain on the reader. minimum errors. free.

You might also like