Beyond-Profit Business Models: Third-Party Funded Models
Beyond-Profit Business Models: Third-Party Funded Models
The application of the Canvas is in no way limited to for-profit cor- donors to Oxfam, a large U.K. non-profit organization, help finance
porations. You can easily apply the technique to non-profit organiza- its efforts to end poverty and social injustice. Third parties rarely
tions, charities, public sector entities, and for-profit social ventures. expect to receive direct economic benefits from the exchange, unlike
Every organization has a business model, even if the word “busi- advertisers—who are players in for-profit business models which
ness” is not used as a descriptor. To survive, every organization that also feature third party financing.
creates and delivers value must generate enough revenue to cover its One risk of the third-party enterprise model is that value creation
expenses. Hence it has a business model. The difference is merely a incentives can become misaligned. The third-party financer becomes
matter of focus: the for-profit business’s goal is to maximize earnings, the main “customer,” so to speak, while the recipient becomes a
while the organizations discussed in the following pages have strong mere receiver. Since the very existence of the enterprise depends on
non-financial missions focused on ecology, social causes, and public contributions, the incentive to create value for donors may be stron-
service mandates. We find useful entrepreneur Tim Clark's suggestion ger than the incentive to create value for recipients.
that the term “enterprise model” be applied to such organizations. All this is not to say that third-party funded enterprise models
We distinguish between two categories of beyond-profit models: are bad and recipient-funded business models are good. Conven-
third-party funded enterprise models (e.g. philanthropy, charities, tional businesslike selling of products and services doesn’t always
264 government) and so-called triple bottom line business models with a work: education, healthcare, and utility services are clear examples.
strong ecological and/or social mission (“triple bottom line” refers to There are no simple answers to the questions raised by third-party
the practice of accounting for environmental and social, as well as finan- financed enterprise models and the resulting risks of misaligned
cial, costs). It is mainly the source of revenue that distinguishes these incentives. We must explore which models make sense, then strive
two, but as a direct consequence they have two very different business to design optimal solutions.
model patterns and drivers. Many organizations are experimenting
with blending the two models in order to exploit the best of both.
which might be a donor or the public sector. The third party pays the product or “recipient”
grameen bank income village phone provide universal access to telecommunications services in remote,
opportunity ladies
network
consortium
KR CH rural areas of his home country of Bangladesh. He achieved his aim
(telenor) mobile villagers
communication grameen bank
network
with a for-profit model that had a profound, positive impact on rural
village phone
ladies
Bangladesh. Grameenphone eventually provided over 200,000
women in rural areas with income-earning opportunities, raised their
C$ R$
network communication income social status, connected 60,000 villages to a mobile phone network, 265
reached 100 million people, turned a profit, and became the Bangla-
social and environmental costs social and environmental benefits
“universal access”
deshi government’s biggest taxpayer.
income for women and To accommodate triple bottom line business models, we can
better social status
extend the Canvas with Blocks illustrating two outcomes: (1) the
social and environmental costs of a business model (i.e. its negative
impact), and (2) the social and environmental benefits of a business
model (i.e. its positive impact). Just as earnings are increased by
minimizing financial costs and maximizing income, the triple bottom
Grameenphone went beyond establishing line model seeks to minimize negative social and environmental
near universal access to telephone service
and earning a profit. It also had substan- impacts and maximize the positive.
tial social impact by providing “village
phone ladies” with earning opportunities
and improved social status.
Mike, a senior business analyst with a large financial group, wraps up support could make creating, storing, manipulating, tracking, and
the first of a two-day workshop he is facilitating with a group of 24 communicating business models far easier. Such support would
executives. He collects the business model prototypes and ideas that seem to be almost a requirement for collaboratively working on busi-
participants sketched on large Canvas posters and hurries to his office. ness models with geographically disparate teams.
There, Mike and his team enter the ideas into a collaborative Doesn’t it seem strange that we can design, simulate, and
computer-aided business model design program to further develop build airplanes or develop software across continents, yet we can’t
the prototypes. Other business analysts working overseas add manipulate highly valuable business models outside of the board-
resource and activity cost estimates, as well as calculations of room and without paper and pencil? It’s time to bring the speed and
potential Revenue Streams. The software then spits out four dif- power of microprocessors to the development and management of
ferent financial scenarios, with business model data and prototype new business models. Inventing innovative business models certainly
diagrams for each plotted on large posters. The following morning requires human creativity, but computer-aided systems could help us
Mike presents the results to the executives, who have gathered for manipulate business models in more sophisticated and complex ways.
the second day of their workshop to discuss the potential risks and An example from the field of architecture is helpful in illustrat-
rewards of each prototype. ing the power of computer-aided design. In the 1980s so-called
266 This scenario doesn’t yet describe reality, but it soon will. A Computer-Aided Design (CAD) systems started becoming more
Business Model Canvas printed on a large poster and a big box of affordable and slowly were adopted by architectural firms. CAD
Post-it™ notes are still the best tools for triggering creativity and made it much easier and cheaper for architects to create three-
generating innovative business model ideas. But this paper-based dimensional models and prototypes. They brought speed, integration,
approach could be extended with the help of computers. improved collaboration, simulation, and better planning to architec-
Turning a prototype business model into a spreadsheet is time- ture practices, Cumbersome manual tasks, such as constant redraw-
consuming, and each change to the prototype usually requires a ing and blueprint sharing, were eliminated, and a whole new world
manual modification of the spreadsheet. A computer-aided system of opportunity, such as rapid visual 3D exploration and prototyping,
could do this automatically and make possible lightning-quick, opened up. Today paper-based sketching and CAD happily co-exist,
comprehensive business model simulations. Furthermore, computer each method retaining its own strengths and weaknesses.
Paper-based Computer-aided
• Paper or poster-based Canvases can be easily created Easy to create, store, manipulate, and track business models 267
and used just about anywhere • Enable remote collaboration
Advantages
• Paper and poster-based Canvases impose few barriers: • Quick, comprehensive financial, other simulations
no need to learn a specific computer application • Provide business model design guidance (critiquing
• Very intuitive and engaging in group settings systems, business model database, pattern ideas,
• Fosters creativity, spurs ideation when used on large surfaces control mechanisms)
• Napkin sketches to draw, understand, or explain • Collaborative business model design with remote teams
Applications
executive summary
KP KA VP CR CS the team
• Management Profile
• Why We Are a Winning Team
KR Ch the business model
• Vision, Mission, and Values
• How Our Business Model Works
• Value Proposition
C$ R$ • Target Markets
• Marketing Plan
• Key Resources and Activities
financial analysis
• Breakeven Analysis
• Sales Scenarios and Projections
financial spreadsheets
• Capital Spending
• Operating Costs
• Funding Requirements 269
external environment
• The Economy
environmental analysis • Market Analysis and Key Trends
• Competitor Analysis
• Competitive Advantages of Our Business Model
implementation roadmap
implementation roadmap • Projects
• Milestones
• Roadmap
risk analysis
SWOT and uncertainty analysis • Limiting Factors and Obstacles
• Critical Success Factors
• Specific Risks and Countermeasures
conclusion
annexes
Structure
The characteristics of a business model determine the optimal
organizational structure for its execution. Does your business model
call for a highly centralized or decentralized organizational structure?
If you will implement the model in an established business, should
the new operation be integrated or spun off (see p. 233)?
KP KA VP
strategy CR CS
KR
people Ch structure
C$ R$
271
rewards processes
Motivation Information
What reward system does your business What information flows, processes,
model require? How can you motivate and workflows does your business
your people? model require?
Aligning information systems and business goals is fundamental Authors Weill and Vitale propose another interesting way to
to the success of an enterprise. Chief executives officers ask their explore IT alignment. They pair categories of IT infrastructure service
chief information officers (CIOs), Do we have the right IT? How do with business models. Weill and Vitale propose aligning business
we know? How can we best align our business with our technology models with application infrastructure, communications manage-
systems? ment, data management, IT management, security, IT architecture,
Information technology research and advisory firm Gartner channel management, IT research and development, and IT training
highlights this issue in a report called “Getting the Right IT: Using and education.
Business Models.” Gartner asserts that the Business Model Canvas On the opposite page we’ve brought these elements together in
is a powerful tool that helps CIOs quickly grasp how a business a graphic to help you pose some fundamental questions regarding
works without getting bogged down in operational details. Gartner business and IT alignment.
recommends that CIOs use the Business Model Canvas to align IT
and key business processes. This helps them align business and IT
decisions without diving too deeply into tactical issues.
We find it useful to pair the Canvas with an Enterprise Archi-
272 tecture approach. Many of the various Enterprise Architecture
concepts describe the enterprise from three perspectives: the busi-
ness perspective, the applications perspective, and the technology
perspective. We recommend using the Canvas to guide the business
perspective, then align the business with the applications and tech-
nology perspectives.
In the application perspective, you describe the portfolio of
applications that leverage aspects of your business model (e.g.
recommendation systems, supply chain management applications,
etc.) and you describe all the business model’s information require-
ments (e.g. customer profiles, warehousing, etc.). In the technology
perspective you describe the technology infrastructure that drives
your business model (e.g. server farms, data storage systems, etc.).
KR Ch
C$ R$
strategy
business model Business
operational models
Applications
How can IT support the processes and Where in my business model does 273
workflows required by my business security play an important role and
models? how does that influence my IT?
Technology
What information do I need to capture, Do I need to invest in IT training
store, share, and manage to improve my and education to leverage my business
business model? model?
WhERE
visionary and
2004: Alexander Osterwalder com-
the model
pletes a Ph.D. dissertation on the topic Alexander and Yves decide they can’t game changing . . .
of business model innovation with credibly write a book about entrepreneurs /
Professor Yves Pigneur at hEC Lausanne, business model innovation with-
consultants /
onsultants /
DID ThIS
Switzerland. Fast forward. 2006: The out an innovative business model.
approach outlined in the dissertation They ditch publishers and launch the executives
ecutives
hub, an online platform to share their
starts being applied around the world
writings from day one. Anybody with
based on Alexander’s business model an interest in the topic can join the
BOOK
blog, notably in companies such as 3M, platform for a fee (initially u.S. $24,
Ericsson, Deloitte, and Telenor. During which is gradually raised to u.S. $243 to
a workshop in the Netherlands Patrick keep the platform exclusive). That this
van der Pijl asks “why is there no and other innovative Revenue Streams
finance the book production in advance
book accompanying the method?”
COME
itself is an innovation as well. It breaks
Alexander and Yves take up the chal- the format of conventional strategy and nd
lenge. But how does one stand management books in order to create
out in a market where countless more value for readers: it is co-created
274 strategy and management books highly visual, and complemented by
FROM?
are published every year? exercises and workshop tips.