Energy Losses
• Identify the conditions under which energy losses occur in fluid flow systems.
• Identify the means by which energy can be added to a fluid flow system.
• Identify the means by which energy can be removed from a fluid flow system.
• Expand Bernoulli’s equation to form the general energy equation by considering
energy losses, energy additions, and energy removals.
• Apply the general energy equation to a variety of practical problems.
• Compute the power added to a fluid by pumps.
Lecturer: Ahmed El-Shafie
Introductory Concepts
• We use the following form of the continuity equation involving
volume flow rate most often when liquids are flowing in the system:
• Because Q = vA, we can write this as
• These relationships allow us to determine the velocity of flow at any
point in a system if we know the volume flow rate and the areas of
the pipes at the sections of interest.
Introductory Concepts
• You should also be familiar with the terms that express the energy
possessed by a fluid per unit weight of the fluid flowing in the
system:
Introductory Concepts
All of this comes together in Bernoulli’s equation,
Nomenclature of Energy Losses and Additions
• We will account for energy losses and additions in a system
in terms of energy per unit weight of fluid flowing in the
system. This is also known as “head”.
• Specifically, we will use the following terms
Nomenclature of Energy Losses and Additions
• The magnitude of energy losses produced by fluid friction, valves,
and fittings is directly proportional to the velocity head of the fluid.
• This can be expressed mathematically as
• The term K is the resistance coefficient.
General Energy Equation
• The general energy equation as used in this text is an expansion of
Bernoulli’s equation, which makes it possible to solve problems in
which energy losses and additions occur.
• Fig 7.6 shows the fluid flow system illustrating the general energy
equation.
• For such a system the expression of the principle of conservation of
energy is
Reynolds Number
• Osborne Reynolds was the first to demonstrate that laminar or
turbulent flow can be predicted if the magnitude of a dimensionless
number, now called the Reynolds number is known.
• The following equation shows the basic definition of the Reynolds
number, NR:
where fluid density ρ, fluid viscosity v, pipe diameter D, and average
velocity of flow v.
Reynolds Number
• Table 8.1 lists the required units in both the SI metric unit system
and the U.S. Customary unit system.
• Converting to these standard units prior to entering data into the
calculation for is recommended.
Reynolds Number
• We can demonstrate that the Reynolds number is dimensionless by
substituting standard SI units into Eq. (8–1):
• Because all units can be cancelled, NR is dimensionless.
Reynolds Number
• The Reynolds number is the ratio of the inertia force on an element
of fluid to the viscous force.
• The inertia force is developed from Newton’s second law of motion,
F = ma.
Critical Reynolds Number
• For practical applications in pipe flow we find that if the Reynolds
number for the flow is less than 2000, the flow will be laminar.
• If the Reynolds number is greater than 4000, the flow can be
assumed to be turbulent.
• In the range of Reynolds numbers between 2000 and 4000, it is
impossible to predict which type of flow exists; therefore this range
is called the critical region.
• We will assume the following:
Example 1
Determine whether the flow is laminar or turbulent if glycerine at
25°C flows in a pipe with a 150-mm inside diameter. The average
velocity of flow is 3.6 m/s.
We must first evaluate the Reynolds number using Eq. (8–1):
Because NR = 708, which is less than 2000, the flow is
laminar. Notice that each term was expressed in
consistent SI units before NR was evaluated.
Example 2
Determine whether the flow is laminar or turbulent if
water at 70°C flows in a 1-in Type K copper tube with a
flow rate of 285 L/min.
For a 1-in Type K copper tube, D=0.02527 m and
A=5.017 x 10–4 m2 (from Appendix H). Then we have
Because the Reynolds number is greater than 4000, the
flow is turbulent.
Example 3
Determine the range of average velocity of flow for
which the flow would be in the critical region if SAE 10
oil at 15°C is flowing in a 2-in Schedule 40 steel pipe.
The oil has a specific gravity of 0.89.
The flow would be in the critical region if 2000<NR<4000.
First, we use the Reynolds number and solve for
velocity:
Example 3
Then we find the values for n, D, and ρ
Substituting these values into Eq. (8–2), we get
Example 3
For NR=2000, we have
For NR=4000, we have
Therefore, if 4.3<v<8.56 m/s, the flow will be in the
critical region.
Darcy’s Equation
• In the general energy equation
the term hL is defined as the energy loss from the system.
• Darcy’s equation shows that
Friction Loss in Laminar Flow
• Because laminar flow is so regular and orderly, we can derive a
relationship between the energy loss and the measurable
parameters of the flow system.
• This relationship is known as the Hagen–Poiseuille equation:
• The Hagen–Poiseuille equation is valid only for laminar flow (NR <
2000).
Friction Loss in Laminar Flow
• If the two relationships for hL are set equal to each other, we can solve
for the value of the friction factor:
• As ,
• Since
Friction Loss in Laminar Flow
• In summary, the energy loss due to friction in laminar flow can be
calculated either from the Hagen–Poiseuille equation,
• or from Darcy’s equation,
where
Example 4
Determine the energy loss if glycerine at 25°C
flows 30 m through a 150-mm-diameter pipe with an
average velocity of 4.0 m/s.
First, we must determine whether the flow is laminar or
turbulent by evaluating the Reynolds number:
From Appendix B, we find that for glycerin at 25°C
Example 4
Because NR < 2000, the flow is laminar. Using Darcy’s
equation, we get
Notice that each term in each equation is expressed in
the units of the SI unit system. Therefore, the resulting
units for hL are m or Nm/N. This means that 13.2 Nm of
energy is lost by each newton of the glycerine as it flows
along the 30 m of pipe.
Example 4
Because NR < 2000, the flow is laminar. Using Darcy’s
equation,
Notice that each term in each equation is expressed in the
units of the SI unit system. Therefore, the resulting units
for hL are m or Nm/N. This means that 13.2 Nm of energy
is lost by each newton of the glycerin as it flows along the
30 m of pipe.
Friction Loss in Turbulent Flow
• For turbulent flow of fluids in circular pipes it is most convenient to
use Darcy’s equation to calculate the energy loss due to friction.
• Turbulent flow is rather chaotic and is constantly varying.
• For these reasons we must rely on experimental data to determine
the value of f.
• Figure 8.5 illustrates pipe wall roughness (exaggerated) as the
height of the peaks of the surface irregularities.
• Because the roughness is somewhat irregular, averaging techniques
are used to measure the overall roughness value.
Friction Loss in Turbulent Flow
Friction Loss in Turbulent Flow
• For commercially available pipe and tubing, the design value of the
average wall roughness has been determined as shown in Table
8.2.
• These are only average values for new, clean pipe. Some variation
should be expected. After a pipe has been in service for a time, the
roughness could change due to the formation of deposits on the wall
or due to corrosion.
Friction Loss in Turbulent Flow
Moody Diagram
One of the most widely used methods for evaluating the friction factor
employs the Moody diagram shown in Fig. 8.6.
Moody Diagram
• Several important observations can be made from these curves:
1. For a given Reynolds number of flow, as the relative roughness is
increased, the friction factor f decreases.
2. For a given relative roughness , the friction factor f decreases with
increasing Reynolds number until the zone of complete turbulence
is reached.
3. Within the zone of complete turbulence, the Reynolds number has
no effect on the friction factor.
4. As the relative roughness increases, the value of the Reynolds
number at which the zone of complete turbulence begins also
increases.
Moody Diagram
Figure is a simplified sketch of Moody’s diagram in which the various zones are
identified.
Moody Diagram
• The laminar zone at the left has already been discussed.
• At the right of the dashed line downward across the diagram is the
zone of complete turbulence.
• Between the smooth pipes line and the line marking the start of
the complete turbulence zone is the transition zone.
Moody Diagram
• Check your ability to read the Moody diagram correctly by
verifying the following values for friction factors for the given
values of Reynolds number and relative roughness, using Fig. 8.6:
Use of the Moody Diagram
• The Moody diagram is used to help determine the value of the
friction factor f for turbulent flow.
• The value of the Reynolds number and the relative roughness
must be known.
• Therefore, the basic data required are the pipe inside diameter,
the pipe material, the flow velocity, and the kind of fluid and its
temperature, from which the viscosity can be found.
Example 5
Determine the friction factor f if water at 70°C is flowing
at 9.14 m/s in an uncoated ductile iron pipe having an
inside diameter of 25 mm.
The Reynolds number must first be evaluated to
determine whether the flow is laminar or turbulent:
Here D=0.025 m and v=4.11x10–7 m2/s. We now have
Example 5
Thus, the flow is turbulent. Now the relative roughness
must be evaluated. From Table 8.2 we find
ε = 2.4 x 10–4 m. Then, the relative roughness is
The final steps in the procedure are as follows:
1. Locate the Reynolds number on the abscissa of the
Moody diagram:
Example 5
2. Project vertically until the curve for D/ε = 104 is
reached. Because 104 is so close to 100, that curve
can be used.
3. Project horizontally to the left, and read f = 0.038.
Example 6
If the flow velocity of water in Problem 8.5 was 0.14 m/s
with all other conditions being the same, determine the
friction factor f. Write
Then, from Fig. 8.6, f = 0.044. Notice that this is on the
curved portion of the curve D/ε and that there is a
significant increase in the friction factor over that in
Example Problem 8.5.
Example 7
Determine the friction factor f if ethyl alcohol at 25°C is
flowing at 5.3 m/s in a standard 1.5-in Schedule 80 steel
pipe.
Evaluating the Reynolds number, we use the equation
From Appendix B, ρ = 787 kg/m3 and μ =1.00 x 10–3
Pa•s. Also, for a 11.2-in Schedule 80 pipe, D = 0.0381
m. Then we have
Example 7
From Fig. 8.6, f = 0.0225. You must interpolate on both
NR and D/ε to determine this value, and you should
expect some variation. However, you should be able to
read the value of the friction factor f within 0.0005
in this portion of the graph.
Example 8
See Fig. 8.8. In a chemical processing plant, benzene at
50°C (sg = 0.86) must be delivered to point B with a
pressure of 550 kPa. A pump is located at point A 21 m
below point B, and the two points are connected by 240
m of plastic pipe having an inside diameter of 50 mm. If
the volume flow rate is 110 L/min, calculate the required
pressure at the outlet of the pump.
Example 8
The relation is
We find that because point B is higher than point A.
zB - zA = +21 m. The evaluation of the Reynolds number
is the first step. The type of flow, laminar or turbulent,
must be determined.
Example 8
For a 50-mm pipe, D = 0.050 m and A = 1.963 x 10-3 m2.
Then, we have
We find that
Thus
Example 8
For turbulent flow, Darcy’s equation should be used:
From Table 8.2, roughness is 3.0 x 10-7 m. Then
Thus,
Example 8
You should have the pressure as follows:
Equation for the Friction Factor
• In the laminar flow zone, for values below 2000, f can be found
from Eq. (8–5),
• The following equation, which allows the direct calculation of the
value of the friction factor for turbulent flow,
• To calculate the value of the friction factor f when the Reynolds
number and relative roughness are known, use Eq. (8–5) for
laminar flow and Eq. (8–7) for turbulent flow.
Hazen-Williams Formula for Water Flow
• The Hazen–Williams formula is one of the most popular formulas for the
design and analysis of water systems. Its use is limited to the flow of water
in pipes larger than 2.0 in and smaller than 6.0 ft in diameter.
• The Hazen–Williams formula is unit-specific. In the U.S. Customary unit
system it takes the form
Hazen-Williams Formula for Water Flow
where
• The coefficient Ch is dependent only on the condition of the
surface of the pipe or conduit. Table 8.3 gives typical values.
Hazen-Williams Formula for Water Flow
• The Hazen–Williams formula for SI units is
Example 9
For what velocity of flow of water in a new, clean, 6-in
Schedule 40 steel pipe would an energy loss of 6.1 m of
head occur over a length of 304.8 m? Compute the
volume flow rate at that velocity. Then refigure the
velocity using the design value of Ch for steel pipe.
We can use Equation (8–8). Write
Example 9
Then
Note that the velocity and volume flow rate are both
directly proportional to the value of Ch. If the pipe
degrades after use so the value of Ch = 100, the
allowable volume flow rate to limit the energy loss to the
same value of 6.1 m per 304.8 m of pipe length would
be
Other Forms of Hazen-Williams Formula
• Other types of calculations that are often desired are:
1. To determine the required size of pipe to carry a given flow rate
while limiting the energy loss to some specified value.
2. To determine the energy loss for a given flow rate through a given
type and size of pipe of a known length.
• Table 8.4 shows several forms of the Hazen–Williams formula that
facilitate such calculations.
8.9 Other Forms of Hazen-Williams Formula
Minor Losses
• Recognize the sources of minor losses.
• Define resistance coefficient.
• Determine the energy loss for flow through the following types of minor losses:
a. Sudden enlargement of the flow path.
b. Exit loss when fluid leaves a pipe and enters a static reservoir.
c. Gradual enlargement of the flow path.
d. Sudden contraction of the flow path.
e. Gradual contraction of the flow path.
f. Entrance loss when fluid enters a pipe from a static reservoir.
Introductory Concepts
• In Chapter 7, you developed the general energy equation, which
extended Bernoulli’s equation to account for energy losses and
additions that typically occur in real flow systems.
Resistant Coefficient
• Energy losses are proportional to the velocity head of the fluid as it
flows around an elbow, through an enlargement or contraction of
the flow section, or through a valve.
• Experimental values for energy losses are usually reported in terms
of a resistance coefficient K as follows:
where hL is the minor loss, K is the resistance coefficient, and is the
average velocity of flow in the pipe in the vicinity where the minor
loss occurs.
Resistant Coefficient
• The resistance coefficient is dimensionless because it represents a
constant of proportionality between the energy loss and the velocity
head.
• The magnitude of the resistance coefficient depends on the
geometry of the device that causes the loss and sometimes on the
velocity of flow.
Sudden Enlargement
• As a fluid flows from a smaller pipe into a larger pipe through a
sudden enlargement, its velocity abruptly decreases, causing
turbulence, which generates an energy loss.
• Fig 10.1 shows the sudden enlargement.
Sudden Enlargement
• The minor loss is calculated from the equation
where v1 is the average velocity of flow in the smaller pipe ahead of
the enlargement.
• By making some simplifying assumptions about the character of the
flow stream as it expands through the sudden enlargement, it is
possible to analytically predict the value of K from the following
equation:
Sudden Enlargement
• shows the resistance coefficient—sudden enlargement.
Sudden Enlargement
• Table 10.1 shows the resistance coefficient—sudden enlargement
Example 1
Determine the energy loss that will occur as 100 L/min of
water flows through a sudden enlargement from a 1-in
copper tube (Type K) to a 3-in tube (Type K). See
Appendix H for tube dimensions.
Example 1
Using the subscript 1 for the section just ahead of the
enlargement and 2 for the section downstream from the
enlargement, we get
Example 1
To find a value for K, the diameter ratio is needed. We
find that
From Fig. , K = 10.2. Then we have
This result indicates that 0.40 Nm of energy is dissipated
from each newton of water that flows through the
sudden enlargement.
Example 2
Determine the difference between the pressure ahead of
a sudden enlargement and the pressure downstream
from the enlargement. Use the data from Example
Problem 1.
First, we write the energy equation:
Example 2
If the enlargement is horizontal, z2 – z1 = 0. Even if it
were vertical, the distance between points 1 and 2 is
typically so small that it is considered negligible. Now,
calculating the velocity in the larger pipe, we get
Example 2
Using γ = 9.81 kN/m3 for water and hL = 0.40m from
Example Problem 10.1, we have
Therefore, p2 is 1.51 kPa greater than p1.
Exit Loss
• As a fluid flows from a pipe into a large reservoir or tank, as shown in
Fig. , its velocity is decreased to very nearly zero.
• Therefore, the energy loss for this condition is
• This is called the exit loss.
Example 3
Determine the energy loss that will occur as 100 L/min of
water flows from a 1-in copper tube (Type K) into a large
tank.
Using Eq. (10–4), we have
From the calculations in Example Problem 1, we know
that
Gradual Enlargement
• If the transition from a smaller to a larger pipe can be made
less abrupt than the square-edged sudden enlargement, the
energy loss is reduced.
• This is normally done by placing a conical section between
the two pipes as shown in Fig. 4.
Gradual Enlargement
• Fig shows the resistance coefficient—gradual enlargement.
Gradual Enlargement
• The energy loss for a gradual enlargement is calculated from
• Data for various values are given below
Gradual Enlargement
• The energy loss calculated from Eq. (10–5) does not include the loss
due to friction at the walls of the transition.
• For relatively steep cone angles, the length of the transition is short
and therefore the wall friction loss is negligible.
Example 4
Determine the energy loss that will occur as 100 L/min of
water flows from a 1-in copper tube (Type K) into a 3-in
copper tube (Type K) through a gradual enlargement
having an included cone angle of 30 degrees.
Using data from Appendix H and the results of some
calculations in preceding example problems, we know
that
Example 4
From Fig. 10.5, we find that K = 0.48. Then we have
Compared with the sudden enlargement described in
Example Problem 1, the energy loss decreases by 33
percent when 30 degrees the gradual enlargement is
used.
Diffuser
• Another term for an enlargement is a diffuser.
• The function of a diffuser is to convert kinetic energy (represented
by velocity head) to pressure energy (represented by the pressure
head) by decelerating the fluid as it flows from the smaller to the
larger pipe.
• The theoretical maximum pressure after the expansion could be
computed from Bernoulli’s equation,
Diffuser
• If the diffuser is in a horizontal plane, the elevation terms can be
cancelled out.
• Then the pressure increase across the ideal diffuser is
• This is often called pressure recovery.
• In a real diffuser, energy losses do occur and the general energy
equation must be used:
Sudden Contraction
• The energy loss due to a sudden contraction, is calculated from
where v2 is the velocity in the small pipe downstream from the
contraction.
• Fig shows the resistance coefficient—sudden contraction.
• Figure illustrates what happens as the flow stream converges. The
lines in the figure represent the paths of various parts of the flow
stream called streamlines.
10.6 Sudden Contraction
10.6 Sudden Contraction
Sudden Contraction
• Table shows the resistance coefficient—sudden contraction
Example 5
Determine the energy loss that will occur as 100 L/min of
water flows from a 3-in copper tube (Type K) into a 1-in
copper tube (Type K) through a sudden contraction.
From Eq. (10–6), we have
For the copper tube,
Example 5
From Fig. 10.7 we can find K = 0.42. Then we have
Gradual Contraction
• The energy loss in a contraction can be decreased substantially by
making the contraction more gradual.
• Figure 10.9 shows such a gradual contraction, formed by a conical
section between the two diameters with sharp breaks at the
junctions.
10.7 Gradual Contraction
• Figure 10.10 shows the data (from Reference 8) for the resistance
coefficient versus the diameter ratio for several values of the cone
angle.
Gradual Contraction
• As the cone angle of the contraction decreases below the resistance
coefficient actually increases, as shown in Fig. 10.11.
• The reason is that the data include the effects of both the local
turbulence caused by flow separation and pipe friction.
• For the smaller cone angles, the transition between the two
diameters is very long, which increases the friction losses.
Gradual Contraction
Gradual Contraction
• In Fig. 10.12, which shows a contraction with a 120° included angle
and D1/D2 = 2.0, the value of K decreases from approximately 0.27 to
0.10 with a radius of only 0.05(D2) where D2 is the inside diameter of
the smaller pipe.
Entrance Loss
• A special case of a contraction occurs when a fluid flows from a
relatively large reservoir or tank into a pipe.
• The fluid must accelerate from a negligible velocity to the flow
velocity in the pipe.
• The ease with which the acceleration is accomplished determines
the amount of energy loss, and therefore the value of the entrance
resistance coefficient is dependent on the geometry of the entrance.
• Figure 10.13 shows four different configurations and the suggested
value of K for each.
10.8 Entrance Loss
Entrance Loss
• In summary, after selecting a value for the resistance coefficient
from Fig. , we can calculate the energy loss at an entrance from
where v2 is the velocity of flow in the pipe.
Example 6
Determine the energy loss that will occur as 100 L /min
of water flows from a reservoir into a 1-in copper tube
(Type K) (a) through an inward-projecting tube and (b)
through a well rounded inlet.
Part (a): For the tube,
Example 6
For an inward-projecting entrance, K = 1.0. Then we
have
For well rounded entrance, K = 0.04. Then we have
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Valves are used to control the amount of flow and may be globe
valves, angle valves, gate valves, butterfly valves, any of several
types of check valves, and many more.
• Fig 10.14 shows the globe value.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Fig 10.15 shows the angle valve.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Fig 10.16 shows the gate valve.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Fig 10.17 shows the check valve.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Fig 10.18 shows the check valve – ball type.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Fig 10.19 shows the butterfly valve.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Fig 10.20 shows the foot valve with strainer—poppet disc type.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Fig 10.22 shows the pipe elbows.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Fig 10.23 shows the standard tees.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• However, the method of determining the resistance coefficient K is
different. The value of K is reported in the form
• The term fT is the friction factor in the pipe to which the valve or
fitting is connected, taken to be in the zone of complete turbulence.
10.9 Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Some system designers prefer to compute the equivalent length of
pipe for a valve and combine that value with the actual length of
pipe.
• Equation (10–8) can be solved for Le
• Table 10.4 shows the resistance in valves and fittings expressed as
equivalent length in pipe diameters, Le>D.
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
• Table 10.5 shows the friction factor in zone of complete turbulence
for new, clean, commercial steel pipe
Resistance Coefficients for Valves and Fittings
Example 7
Determine the resistance coefficient K for a fully open
globe valve placed in a 6-in Schedule 40 steel pipe.
From Table 10.4 we find that the equivalent-length ratio
for a fully open globe valve is 340. From Table 10.5 we
find fT = 0.016 for a 6-in pipe. Then,
Example 7
Using D=0.154 m for the pipe, we find the equivalent
length
Example 8
Calculate the pressure drop across a fully open globe
valve placed in a 4-in Schedule 40 steel pipe carrying
0.0252 m3/s of oil (sg = 0.87)
A sketch of the installation is shown in Fig. 10.24. To
determine the pressure drop, the energy equation
should be written for the flow between points 1 and 2:
Example 8
The energy loss hL is the minor loss due to the valve
only. The pressure drop is the difference between p1 and
p2. Solving the energy equation for this difference gives
But z1 = z2 and v1 = v2. Then we have
Example 8
For the pipe,
From Table 10.5 we find fT = 0.017 and for global valve,
Le/D = 340.
Example 8
For the oil,
Therefore, the pressure in the oil drops by 23.9 kPa as it
flows through the valve. Also, an energy loss of 2.802 m
is dissipated as heat from each pound of oil that flows
through the valve.
Example 9
Calculate the energy loss for the flow of 500 m3/h of
water through a standard tee connected to a 6-in
uncoated ductile iron pipe. The flow is through the
branch.
Use the Procedure for Computing the Energy Loss.