0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views1 page

PIIS0022391304004056

dental

Uploaded by

Najeeb Ullah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
64 views1 page

PIIS0022391304004056

dental

Uploaded by

Najeeb Ullah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

WAGHORN AND KUZMANOVIC THE JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY

(Metaux Precieux, Neuchatel, Switzerland) and 5. Krol AJ. RPI (rest, proximal plate, I bar) clasp retainer and its
modifications. Dent Clin North Am 1973;17:631-49.
a tungsten carbide fissure bur (HM460 FX; Mei- 6. Kratochvil FJ. Influence of occlusal rest position and clasp design on
singer, Düsseldorf, Germany) (Fig. 1). movement of abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:114-24.
5. Place the previously made thermoformed matrix 7. Stern WJ. Guiding planes in clasp reciprocation and retention. J Prosthet
Dent 1975;34:408-14.
onto the prepared diagnostic cast. With a hot 8. The glossary of prosthodontics terms. 7th ed. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:
scalpel, remove areas of the thermoformed matrix 39-110.
which overlay the prepared guiding planes. 9. Krikos AA. Preparing guiding planes for removable partial dentures.
J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:152-5.
6. Place the prepared thermoformed matrix intraorally. 10. McCarthy MF. An intraoral surveyor. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:462-4.
With marking sticks, highlight the mesial and distal 11. Jochen DG. Achieving planned parallel guiding planes for removable
regions of abutments that are visible as they bulge partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:654-61.
12. Owen P. Fundamentals of removable partial dentures. 2nd ed. Cape Town
through the matrix (Dr Thomson’s Sanitary Color (South Africa): University of Cape Town Press; 2000. p. 41-4.
Applicators; Great Plains Dental Products Co,
Kingman, Kan) (Fig. 2). Retain the matrix intra- Reprint request to:
DR DUSAN KUZMANOVIC
orally and prepare parallel guiding planes by DEPARTMENT OF ORAL DIAGNOSTIC AND SURGICAL SCIENCE
recontouring marked proximal surfaces of the SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY
abutment tooth using a diamond bur (837-014; 280 GT KING ST.
UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO DUNEDIN
SS White, Piscataway, NJ). NEW ZEALAND
FAX: +64 3 479 6530
REFERENCES E-MAIL: [email protected]
1. Rudd RW, Bange AA, Rudd KD, Montalvo R. Preparing teeth to receive
a removable partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:536-49. 0022-3913/$30.00
2. Ahmad I, Waters NE. Value of guide planes in partial denture retention. Copyright ª 2004 by The Editorial Council of The Journal of Prosthetic
J Dent 1992;20:59-64. Dentistry
3. Bezzon OL, Mattos MG, Ribero RF. Surveying removable partial dentures:
the importance of guiding planes and path of insertion for stability.
J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:412-8.
4. McCracken WL. Contemporary partial denture designs. J Prosthet Dent
1958;8:71-84. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.011

A survey of the use of mandibular implant overdentures in 10 countries


Noteworthy Abstracts Carlsson GE, Kronström M, de Baat C, Cune M, Davis D, Garefis P, Heo SJ,
of the Jokstad A, Matsuura M, Närhi T, Ow R, Pissiotis A, Sato H, Zarb GA. Int J
Current Literature Prosthodont 2004;17:211-7

Purpose. This preliminary international survey compared provision of implant-retained overdentures to fixed
implant-supported prostheses for edentulous mandibles.
Materials and Methods. Questionnaires based on a 2001 Swedish study were sent to prosthodontists and
specialist clinics in nine additional countries.
Results. Response rate varied from 53% to 100% in 10 national surveys and should allow careful comparison of
results. The relationship between implant overdentures and fixed implant-supported prostheses in treatment of
edentulous mandibles varied much; in Sweden, the proportion of overdentures was 12%, whereas it was 93% in
the Netherlands. In all countries, the most common reason for choice of the overdenture was reduced cost. In
all but two countries, the majority of respondents thought that patients with implant overdentures were equally
or more satisfied with overdentures as those with fixed implant-supported prostheses.
Conclusion. There were great differences among the 10 countries in choice of implant treatment of the
edentulous mandible. The relative proportion of mandibular overdentures to fixed prostheses was low in
Sweden and Greece and varied from one to two thirds in the other countries, except the
Netherlands.—Reprinted with permission of Quintessence Publishing.

AUGUST 2004 201

You might also like